Friday, June 01, 2012

capitol as power...,

bnarchives | Conventional theories of capitalism are mired in a deep crisis: after centuries of debate, they are still unable to tell us what capital is. Liberals and Marxists think of capital as an economic entity that they count in universal units of utils and abstract labor, respectively. But these units are totally fictitious: they can be neither observed nor measured. They don’t exist. And since liberalism and Marxism depend on these non-existing units, their theories hang in suspension. They cannot explain the process that matters most – the accumulation of capital.

This breakdown is no accident. Every mode of power evolves together with its dominant theories and ideologies. In capitalism, these theories and ideologies originally belonged to the study of political economy – the first mechanical science of society. But the capitalist mode of power kept changing, and as the power underpinnings of capital became increasingly visible, the science of political economy disintegrated. By the late nineteenth century, with dominant capital having taken command, political economy was bifurcated into two distinct spheres: economics and politics. And in the twentieth century, when the power logic of capital had already penetrated every corner of society, the remnants of political economy were further fractured into mutually distinct social sciences. Nowadays, capital reigns supreme – yet social scientists have been left with no coherent framework to account for it.

The theory of Capital as Power offers a unified alternative to this fracture. It argues that capital is not a narrow economic entity, but a symbolic quantification of power. Capital has little to do with utility or abstract labor, and it extends far beyond machines and production lines. Most broadly, it represents the organized power of dominant capital groups to reshape – or creorder – their society.

This view leads to a different cosmology of capitalism. It offers a new theoretical framework for capital based on the twin notions of dominant capital and differential accumulation, a new conception of the state of capital and a new history of the capitalist mode of power. It also introduces new empirical research methods – including new categories; new ways of thinking about, relating and presenting data; new estimates and measurements; and, finally, the beginning of a new, disaggregate accounting that reveals the conflictual dynamics of society.

4 comments:

Dale Asberry said...

Lol, I thought this article looked familiar... I sent it to you 2 years ago!

arnach said...

blog post title:  typo or freudian (or intentional) reference to the power of politics?

CNu said...

intentional..., been argering with CDV about the Obamamandian imperative for a minute now yonder http://wearerespectablenegroes.blogspot.com/2012/05/racial-aikido-genius-of-mitt-romneys.html

CNu said...

FROM THE REVIEW: "Amidst the social sciences scholarship that is
dominated by either neoclassical economics or Marxist views, Capital as
Power presents a thought-provoking and erudite argumentation of an
alternative understanding of the nature of capital. . . . The
quintessential strength of this volume is its extensive historicisation
of the major problems that haunt political economy, followed by a clear
presentation of key paradigms in understanding capital; before
eventually presenting their ambitious goal of reintroducing power
dynamics as the ultimate working principle behind capital and its
accompanying processes. . . . I suspect that this work will be an
eventual classic in political economy for its deeply impressive
challenge to the orthodoxy of the discipline, as well as its remarkable
survey of the state of the scholarship on capital."  http://bnarchives.yorku.ca/334/
 

The MSM Is Accidentally On-Purpose Throwing In The Towel On Biden

kunstler  |    “Biden’s most important achievements may be that he rescued the presidency from Trump, resumed a more traditional style of...