The % of people (Khazarian gangsters) in favor of continued hostilities with Russia is really quite small. "it's all over but for the crying!"
Actually, it was all over way back when Russia didn't collapse. Come to think of it, that would be a good project/essay for someone to study and publish. Is there a day/week where one could point to and ID a specific point at which the crisis passed? (Was there even actually such a point or was it just the grand cacophony of western media?)
It is clear that Russia has already won in Ukraine. Therefore, any reconciliation will be on the winner's terms and Russia cannot simply forgive and forget. They have learned a very important lesson, which is that the Anglo Saxons are not entirely in control of their political fate, and consequently, are only at liberty to respond to an overwhelming display of strength. It remains to be seen what consequences will unfold for the small minority of Khazarian gangsters who have ruled the British and U.S. Anglo-Saxon elites via extortion for the past ___ years.
After Ukraine is rolled up (in a matter of weeks?) from a combination
of the US election blowout, subsequent supply termination, general
winter and Russia's big push offensive, what's the point of continuation?
The military industrial complex has been the major player in US life, but in order to keep the peace domestically, energy, construction, agribusiness, automotive, travel etc. must all get their economic due as well. Russia is an absolute gold mine of opportunity - we need to consider everyone else wanting to get into the game vs the Khazarian mafia bankers keeping it to themselves. Constant terrorism, regional conflicts, arms sales and all the rest - keep the chances of nuclear escalation high. Non Americans are mistaken if they think the majority of American citizens here will accept the Khazarian status quo.
The typical American really only cares about 'getting ahead'. The usual first question when meeting someone is "what do you do?" Not out of genuine curiosity, but rather as a form of value assessment. Love it or hate it, at the end of the day it's why people would love a leader who could get gas back under $3/gallon. Doing a deal with Russia is the first big step in that direction.
So when an existential crisis ends, it's time for everyone to get back to the business of enjoying life.
That's why I believe that after the electoral blowout next week, the Ukraine spigot will be turned off.
There will be calls to investigate the origins of the war as it will be used to score political points by hanging this albatross around the Biden/Blinken/Nuland regime's neck. We'll go back to trying to isolate China while attempting to bring Russia back into the fold. Levis, pop music, fast food, the whole western cultural experience (sans woke shit) for the offing.
They've got the energy, we've got $uncle bucks. The spending explosion in Moscow and other regional hotspots is just sitting there waiting to be launched. There was never any real intention to engage in a land battle over Ukraine. Rather, as has been pointed out by so many, it became an exercise is testing equipment, drawing down stores in order to acquire fresh arsenals, money laundering and career advancement.
From a US perspective, its basically off the news now. Sure, you can go find news if you so desire, but it's not being trumpeted 24/7 in your face as it was just a few months back. That both tells and reassures me of some basic American characteristics:
One, very short attention spans; No ancient Khazarian blood feuds here. Remember, everyone here is a product of people literally walking away from family/regional connections.
Two, we haven't had an actual existential fight on our land for 160 years. It's why Americans won't accept large losses - these overseas adventures are all fine and dandy if the losses are kept to a minimum. Three, dropping Ukraine doesn't mean the battle for Russia is over. Rather, it will simply transition to another theater in the so called hybrid scheme.
In fact, we could even become great pals again and include Russia in the dollar regime. As I keep saying, $usd = energy. Russia has the energy, so why not accept a sweet heart deal that leads to an economic building boom? It's the old make or buy analysis: go your own way with all the attendant, drawn out sabotage and interference, or reach an agreement where both parties benefit today?
0 comments:
Post a Comment