Rather, they either become consumed by tactical battlefield analyses, or start to fixate on Russia's existential position. Case in point, once the Khazarian bio-labs in
Izyium an
But who here is considering the USA's rationale? As the lion, shark or spider must kill to eat, so too must an empire based on debt money consume all available resources. And who has the globe's last great stores?
What happens to the $USD if we can't access/control these resources to ensure that the dollar power lives on?
This is why Ukraine is really the OK corral. - we're all in. But how do we ensure success? The same way we always have - by establishing the "victims" moral authority to engage in total war. In this case, total war can be rationalized that a desperate Russia used the first battlefield nuke. Why would they do that? Because they were losing so badly as to be on verge of system wide collapse.
How do we "know" Russia is losing across a collapsing front? Because the massed social media (troll army flooding all platforms) repeats the claim as virtual shock troops while the broader audience is bombarded by the MSM.
What is your take away? Patreaus, et al are telling anybody
paying attention that we will escalate and retaliate with nuclear weapons as
justification for Russia's "first strike".
The Nordstream false flag was just a dry run.
"Russia will attack other Russian pipelines soon" says John Brennan.
— Rosie's Social Media Madhouse! (@DarnelSugarfoo) October 3, 2022
Translation: The US will blow up Turkstream. https://t.co/riSbbyhtg9
Perhaps the global social conversation should move away from passive topical discussion to more actively sounding world-wide alarm:
Whereas,
1. The $US dollar system requires constant expansionary growth to survive;
2. Credit expansion demands energy inputs along the entire cycle of production, delivery, use and service;
3. The world's last great stores of critical natural resources reside within Russia's geographic boundaries and remain under Russia's political control;
4. Ukraine is being used as a fulcrum to advance the collapse of the Russian state to facilitate resource expropriation for the West;
5. The USA lacks any feasible way forward to achieving victory in Ukraine by limiting itself to the use of conventional force of arms;
6. US failure in Ukraine will lead to a collapse of dollar dependent Western political and socio-economic institutions, including the MIC, Federal Reserve and perhaps the U.S. government itself;
7. Failure vis-a-vis Russia in the Ukraine theater therefore threatens the USA with a direct, critical existentional crisis;
8. US policy and decision makers may have already concluded that a Sampson option via escalation represents the most logical option if the USA as it currently exists were to fail anyway.
Therefore,
It is concluded that global and worldwide political leaders, influential persons and other interested voices should appeal to more rationale minds within the U.S. government to reconsider contemplating this course of action.
The Sampson option.
Let's review basic game theory: if the USA (by that i mean the $USD) is guaranteed to lose under existing, conventional circumstances - then why not gamble that your 1 or 2 reply may be defeated/prevented and/or forestalled?
If they too fail, where's the net incremental loss?
You're an American - you know that a failure of the
$USD brings down the entire socio political edifice and functioning
economy that supports the MIC, FIRE, and those of us peasants not eke-ing out paycheck-to-paycheck survival.
In other words, Russia represents an existential threat to our very way of life.
And what is our takeaway from all the above?
Russia is losing so badly that in a final desperate act to forestall a total government collapse, madman Putin WILL resort to utilizing nuclear weapons.
At that point the collective west will be fully justified in retaliating in like manner and possible escalating in order to defeat the threat of an evil Putin/Russia.
Since the west ($USD) must have Russia’s resources in order to survive, a drawn out, protracted settlement, truce, stalemate in Ukraine doesn't do us any good.
Time is on Russia’s side, not ours. We must collapse, divide & plunder NOW in order to prevail. We can't do that via conventional means, so we must use nuclear weapons.
Finally, we MUST BE ABLE TO blame Russia in order to assert a "victims" moral authority.
0 comments:
Post a Comment