“Renewable”
energy kingpin Elon Musk practically takes credit for the Bolivian
lithium coup just months after planning a meeting with Bolsonaro ahead
of a Tesla factory in lithium rich Brazil https://t.co/PcizH4pLfQ
https://t.co/7kTrA7fPsV
pic.twitter.com/zaVqte1KHW
—
Max Blumenthal (@MaxBlumenthal) July
25, 2020
strategic-culture | A recent off-hand remark by one of America’s oligarchs points toward a
new methodology for undermining what is left of international law and
order. Speaking in earnest or in jest, nobody really knows, but smart
money would certainly bet on the former, when admonished that the
Bolivian coup that toppled President Evo Morales last year “wasn’t in
the best interests of the Bolivian people,” Elon Musk, the Tesla electric car magnate, brazenly tweeted: “We will coup whoever we want. Deal with it!”
There is, of course, room for plausible deniability here because Musk
was responding to another tweet calling the U.S. government, not Musk
directly, to account for “organizing a coup against Evo Morales in
Bolivia so you could obtain the lithium there.” Musk’s “we” response
could theoretically be interpreted as not a personal confession of
responsibility for the dastardly deed but, rather, a good citizen’s
loyal expression of support for his country’s foreign policy. Charitably
speaking such a reading is possible. But speaking more realistically
Musk, although associated in the public mind with a pioneering electric
car design, did in fact have a very vital interest in the Bolivian
regime change operation. Electric cars, to put it very simply, run on
lithium batteries, and Bolivia just happens to be a major supplier of
that ore. No lithium, no Tesla or any other electric vehicles.
To fill in some more blanks, it also happens that just weeks before
the coup in November of 2019, President Morales issued a decree
essentially nationalizing Bolivia’s mineral wealth, including lithium
deposits. Bolivia watchers, of course, could see it coming for some
time. The politically artless President disclosed his audacious
game-plan to empower the Bolivian people to enjoy the benefits of their
country’s wealth two years before. Just read and weep at his naiveté:
“Bolivian President Evo Morales sees a prosperous future for his
currently impoverished South American nation, pinning his hopes on the
rapid rise in the global price of this valuable resource. ‘We
will develop a huge lithium industry, over $800 million have already
been made available,’ Morales told the German DPA news agency.”
So the jackals were put on notice as early as 2017. Morales’ “sins”
were numerous enough and he would have been targeted for removal anyway
even if he had not antagonized the lithium cartel by announcing the
ambitious project to extract a fair price from it. But now we have at
least established that Elon Musk and his local agents “highly likely”
were not neutral observers while preparations for the coup were being
conducted. Musk may have made his “we can coup whoever we want” remark
as a loyal citizen who supports his country’s hemispheric interests, but
clearly he also had significant financial interests of his own in this
controversy.
Indeed, the contest between the individual by the name of Elon Musk
and the country of Bolivia was anything but the “level playing field”
that noble U.S. diplomacy insisted on in Bosnia while their local team
was losing. Musk’s personal worth of $68 billion contrasts rather conspicuously with Bolivia’s GNP of $40.58 billion in 2019.
Quite simply, the American oligarch could buy Bolivia and have plenty
of change left over. But why buy it if you can far more cheaply organize
a coup, put your people in charge, and then own it, including the
lithium? That is a much more sensible business plan.
0 comments:
Post a Comment