theintercept | Our rulers did demonstrate a spasm of rationality with the passage of
the CARES Act in March. It was partly a cash-grab by big business but
did get lots of people a $1,200 check and provided an extra $600 per
week in federal unemployment benefits on top of state benefits.
Without these benefits, the 30 million people who lost their jobs in
March and April would have already plummeted into the void. And because
everyone’s spending is someone else’s income, as they fell they would
have grabbed onto tens of millions more and taken them down as well.
And in fact, this downward spiral began to happen
in mid-March. As the danger of Covid-19 became clear, consumer spending
dropped by an astonishing 30 percent in a matter of days. But as soon
as the government cash started flowing, spending began to recover, and
it’s now more than 90 percent of normal. In poorer zip codes, it’s
returned to almost 100 percent.
This has kept the lives of tens of millions of Americans merely bad,
rather than totally impossible. But the supplemental unemployment
benefits expire at the end of July. The GOP opening bid is to extend
them but to cut the amount from $600 to $200. The reason, Treasury
Secretary Steve Mnuchin explained in the Oval Office,
is to prevent malingering: “We’re going to make sure that we don’t pay
people more money to stay home than go to work.” In addition, Senate
Majority Leader Mitch McConnell has said that the Republican “red line”
in negotiations is making it essentially impossible for employees to sue employers on the grounds that their workplace is failing to protect them
from Covid-19. Furthermore, under the proposed new rules,
employers and even the Trump Justice Department would find it easy to
countersue workers for bringing a coronavirus lawsuit.
Rationally, of course, this makes no sense. For most of the
unemployed, there aren’t any jobs to go back to, and won’t be until the
pandemic is under control. If their unemployment benefits are cut,
people without jobs will desperately cut back on spending, leading to
more unemployment, which will lead to less spending, and so on. The
process will be accelerated as states and cities, which until now have attempted to avoid slashing payrolls in hopes that the federal government would rescue them, finally do so.
This may plausibly lead to basic material deprivation — true hunger
and homelessness — on a scale few alive today have ever seen. According
to the Census Bureau, the number of America’s 249 million households
reporting that they sometimes or often do not have enough to eat has
already jumped from 22.5 million earlier this year to 29.3 million in
July. With Republicans opposing
an expansion of food stamp funding, as well as the renewal of the CARES
Act supplemental food program for children, that is likely just the
beginning.
Then there’s housing. The CARES Act contained a federal ban on
evictions that covered about 30 percent of U.S. rental units. That ban
just ended, as have most state-level bans. Forty million people could potentially lose their homes in the next several months. In states like Florida, Texas, and New York, half of the tenants will shortly be unable to make the rent.
0 comments:
Post a Comment