pbs | Upper class men built and curated the U.S. Tennis and Lawn
Association, now the USTA, toward the end of the Victorian era. Even
though women played, men led the association for more than 100 years,
wrote its rules — what players wore, when women played, how many sets in
a match and more — and enforced them.
One of the first examples of this appears as an asterisk in its rules
from 1903, clarifying that, “it was (officially) decided that ‘all
matches in which ladies take part in tournaments … shall be the best two
in three sets.’” Men continued playing five.
Historian Warren Kimball, a former volunteer for the association who
spent years curating the association’s history for his book, “Raising
the Game,” said he never found a documented explanation for this rule,
but feels certain that men just decided that “women were not strong
enough.”
That rule persisted for the better part of tennis’ history and still
exists today for the biggest championship under the association’s
governance: the U.S. Open. Except now, Thompson said, some
traditionalists use this disparity as an argument to push against equal
pay.
The association was also ignoring if not rejecting black players,
even though Tuskegee Institute, an all-black college, held tournaments
as early as the 1890s, according to the book.
While it had black players on its Ivy League teams, it declined
Howard University’s application for membership in 1922, according to
minutes published in the book, because “southern clubs would ‘see red’
on that … there would be no chance in the world of a club of negros
[sic] getting membership in the Association.”
By the late 1940s, white women were struggling with rules policing
their femininity and how they should look on the court. American
Gertrude Augusta Moran, known as “Gussie,” wanted to feel more feminine,
and reached out to a top designer ahead of her Wimbledon tournament to
ask for a colorful ensemble.
The designer, knowing Wimbledon’s strict, all-white rules that are
almost the same today, instead designed a short skirt and lace-trimmed
underwear, which she wore for the first time at a pre-match tea party.
“Gorgeous Gussie’s Lace-Fringed Panties No. 1 Attraction on Wimbledon’s
Courts,” was the headline that ran in The New York Times reviewing the
party.
By the time she had to compete, she walked onto the court with the
racket in front of her face, while photographers pushed for space on the
floor to get a shot of the lace. She was eliminated from Wimbledon
early and the designer was banned from hosting and dressing other
players.
Even though she ranked fourth in the nation at her peak, because of
the reaction to her lace, her legacy as a sex symbol consumed her
reputation for talent.
“I really couldn’t handle the pressure,” she told the Orlando Sentinel nearly 40 years later.
0 comments:
Post a Comment