rollingstone | This is why her shifting explanations and flippant attitude
about the email scandal are almost more unnerving than the ostensible
offense. She seems confident that just because her detractors are
politically motivated, as they always have been, that they must be
wrong, as they often were.
But that's faulty thinking. My worry is that Democrats like Hillary
have been saying, "The Republicans are worse!" for so long that they've
begun to believe it excuses everything. It makes me nervous to see
Hillary supporters like law professor Stephen Vladeck arguing in the New York Times that the real problem wasn't anything Hillary did, but that the Espionage Act isn't "practical."
If you're willing to extend the "purity" argument to the Espionage Act, it's only a matter of time before you get in real trouble. And even if it doesn't happen this summer,
Democrats may soon wish they'd picked the frumpy senator from Vermont
who probably checks his restaurant bills to make sure he hasn't been undercharged.
But in the age of Trump, winning is the only thing that matters,
right? In that case, there's plenty of evidence suggesting Sanders would
perform better against a reality TV free-coverage machine like Trump than would Hillary Clinton. This would largely be due to the passion and energy of young voters.
Young people don't see the Sanders-Clinton race as a choice between
idealism and incremental progress. The choice they see is between an
honest politician, and one who is so profoundly a part of the problem
that she can't even see it anymore.
They've seen in the last decades that politicians who promise they
can deliver change while also taking the money, mostly just end up
taking the money.
And they're voting for Sanders because his idea of an entirely
voter-funded electoral "revolution" that bars corporate money is, no
matter what its objective chances of success, the only practical road
left to break what they perceive to be an inexorable pattern of
corruption.
Young people aren't dreaming. They're thinking. And we should listen to them.
0 comments:
Post a Comment