If the title hasn’t already piqued your interest, its thesis surely
will. The thesis is wild, bold, and original, but makes an eerie amount
of sense. If true, it would be a revolution — and I don’t use the term
lightly — in how we understand the evolution of cooperation, warfare,
and religion, not to mention music and maybe even language.
I have my reservations about Jordania’s theory (and his book), but
I’ll save them for a later time. As Daniel Dennett once wrote about
another remarkable theory:
I think first it is very important to understand [the]
project, to see a little bit more about what the whole shape of it is,
and delay the barrage of nitpicking objections and criticisms until we
have seen what the edifice as a whole is. After all, on the face of it,
[the project] is preposterous… [but] I take it very seriously.
These are exactly my feelings about Jordania’s project. Seemingly preposterous, but worth taking very seriously.