abcnews | Fury is an inadequate description for the former-CIA director's wife,
Holly Petraeus' reaction after she learned that her husband had an
affair with Broadwell, a former spokesman for David Petraeus told ABC
News.
"Well, as you can imagine, she's not exactly pleased right now," retired
U.S. Army Col. Steve Boylan said. "In a conversation with David
Petraeus this weekend, he said that, 'Furious would be an
understatement.' And I think anyone that's been put in that situation
would probably agree. He deeply hurt the family."
As for Petraeus, the retired Army general who resigned as CIA director
last week after admitting the extramarital relationship, he, "first of
all, deeply regrets and knows how much pain this has caused his family,"
Boylan added.
"He had a huge job and he felt he was doing great work and that is all gone now."
Petraeus knows "this was poor judgment on his part. It was a colossal mistake. ... He's acknowledged that," Boylan said.
One result is that Petraeus could possibly face military prosecution
for adultery if officials turn up any evidence to counter his apparent
claims that the affair began after he left the military.
But Boylan says the affair between Petraeus and his biographer, Paula
Broadwell, both of whom are married, began several months after his
retirement from the Army in August 2011 and ended four months ago.
Broadwell, 40, had extraordinary access to the 60-year-old general
during six trips she took to Afghanistan as his official biographer, a
plum assignment for a novice writer.
"For him to allow the very first biography to be written about him, to
be written by someone who had never written a book before, seemed very
odd to me," former Petraeus aide Peter Mansoor told ABC News.
The timeline of the relationship, according to Petraeus, would mean that
he was carrying on the affair for the majority of his tenure at the
CIA, where he began as director Sept. 6, 2011. If he carried on the
affair while serving in the Army, however, Petraeus could face charges,
according to Article 134 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice, which
reprimands conduct "of a nature to bring discredit upon the armed
forces."
Whether the military would pursue such action, whatever evidence it accumulates, is unclear.
0 comments:
Post a Comment