thearchdruidreport | If
by some combination of sheer luck and hard campaigning, Bernie Sanders becomes
the next president of the United States, it’s a safe bet that the starry-eyed
leftists who helped put him into office will once again get to spend four or
eight years trying to pretend that their candidate isn’t busy betraying all of
the overheated expectations that helped put him into office. As Karl Marx
suggested in one of his essays, if history repeats itself, the first time is
tragedy but the second is generally farce; he didn’t mention what the third
time around was like, but we may just get to find out.
The fact that this particular fantasy has so tight a grip on
the imagination of the Democratic party’s leftward wing is also worth studying.
There are many ways that a faction whose interests are being ignored by the
rest of its party, and by the political system in general, can change that
state of affairs. Unquestioning faith that this or that leader will do the job
for them is not generally a useful strategy under such conditions, though,
especially when that faith takes the place of any more practical activity.
History has some very unwelcome things to say, for that matter, about the dream
of political salvation by some great leader; so far it seems limited to certain
groups on the notional left of the electorate, but if it spreads more widely,
we could be looking at the first stirrings of the passions and fantasies that
could bring about a new American fascism.
Meanwhile, just as the Democratic party in recent decades
has morphed into America’s conservative party, the Republicans have become its
progressive party. That’s another thing you’re not supposed to say in today’s
America, because of the bizarre paralogic that surrounds the concept of
progress in our collective discourse. What the word “progress” means, as I hope
at least some of my readers happen to remember, is continuing further in the
direction we’re already going—and that’s all it means. To most Americans today,
though, the actual meaning of the word has long since been obscured behind a
burden of vague emotion that treats “progressive” as a synonym for “good.”
Notice that this implies the very odd belief that the direction in which we’re
going is good, and can never be anything other than good.
For the last forty years, mind you, America has been moving
steadily along an easily defined trajectory. We’ve moved step by step toward
more political and economic inequality, more political corruption, more
impoverishment for those outside the narrowing circles of wealth and privilege,
more malign neglect toward the national infrastructure, and more environmental
disruption, along with a steady decline in literacy and a rolling collapse in
public health, among other grim trends. These are the ways in which we’ve been
progressing, and that’s the sense in which the GOP counts as America’s current
progressive party: the policies being proposed by GOP candidates will push
those same changes even further than they’ve already gone, resulting in more
inequality, corruption, impoverishment, and so on.
So the 2016 election is shaping up to be a contest between
one set of candidates who basically want to maintain the wretchedly
unsatisfactory conditions facing the American people today, and another set who
want to make those conditions worse, with one outlier on the Democratic side
who says he wants to turn the clock back to 1976 or so, and one outlier on the
Republican side who apparently wants to fast forward things to the era of
charismatic dictators we can probably expect in the not too distant future.
It’s not too hard to see why so many people looking at this spectacle aren’t
exactly seized with enthusiasm for any of the options being presented to them
by the existing political order.
0 comments:
Post a Comment