resourceinsights | Jeremy Rifkin announced the end of work in a book by that title in 1995. Today, we are once again being told that the end of work is nigh. The Atlantic Monthly tells us so in a piece entitled, "A World Without Work."
Automation and computer technology will bring unimaginable change and
prosperity--and result in the loss of millions of jobs that will not be
replaced.
I heard this before when I was young. In the 1960s there
was talk of a three-day workweek for similar reasons. Obviously, it
didn't work out.
My purpose here is not to provide a detailed
critique of such prognostications. Rather, I ask the same question I ask
when I see a science-fiction film depicting widespread space travel and
planetary colonization. Where are they getting all the energy to do
these things?
In the Atlantic piece--a clever and rather
more subtle discussion of the post-work world than I've seen
elsewhere--the word "energy" appears exactly zero times. It is assumed
that humans will somehow extract enough energy to run all the new
machines that will serve (or run?) us. It is assumed that climate change
will not be so disruptive as to make our current technical civilization
crumble or at least falter significantly. It is assumed that the
modeled effects of climate change on the world's major grain growing
areas--lots of drought--won't change our priorities drastically toward
growing more food in more places. In short, the future is just the past
with a lot more energy-guzzling gadgets and apparently a lot more
playtime.
Victorian culture repressed sex, not the act
itself--population rose briskly in 19th century Britain--but discussion
of sex, examination of it. Today, one can walk into any decent-sized
bookstore and get an illustrated manual on sexual positions. Today,
people get therapy to improve their sex lives, brag openly about their
sexual conquests, and have frank discussions with one another about each
other's sexual preferences. That repression is over--to the dismay of
some and to the delight of others.
Today, a new psychological
repression hides in plain sight. It is the servant of a modern ideology,
a religion really, that says the material world is soulless and merely
fodder for economic growth. This repression prevents most from seeing
our ecological predicament and therefore from understanding it or acting
in response to it. This repression is of the very physical world about
us and the vast and complex interconnections which govern our lives and
the life of the planet.
Our psyche is now programmed to register
the physical world as a substrate for our fantasies of dominion and
mastery, but rarely as a master to us. The fantasy is that humans are in
one category and nature in another, a nature that is very much
subservient to our wishes.
A subset of this repression is the
difficulty in talking about the vulnerability of an energy system that
relies for more than 80 percent of its energy on finite fossil fuels. A
friend of mine related a conversation with an engineer who disputed that
oil is a finite resource. My friend being clever and patient got the
engineer to agree that the Earth is a sphere and that it has a
calculable volume. He then got the engineer to agree that that volume is
finite, and that oil, being a subset of the Earth's volume, must also
be finite.
0 comments:
Post a Comment