I
don't think I have ever had a conversation that long with anyone.
Seriously -- think about that. We sat in a windowless podcast booth with
two sets of headphones and microphones, and a few feet between us. Not a
single interruption. No cellphones. No distractions. No bathroom
breaks.
At
a time when there is a desire for shorter, crisper content --
responding to abbreviated human attention spans -- one of the most
popular podcasts in the country features conversations that last
exceptionally long and go particularly deep.
Many
friends cautioned me against accepting Joe's invitation. "There is
little room for reasonable conversations anymore," one person told me.
"He is a brawler and doesn't play fair," another warned. In fact, when I
told Joe early in the podcast that I didn't agree with
his apparent views on vaccines against Covid,
ivermectin and many things in between, part of me thought the MMA,
former Taekwondo champion might hurtle himself across the table and
throttle my neck. But, instead he smiled, and off we went.
OK, I am embellishing here, but Joe Rogan is the one guy in the country I
wanted to exchange views with in a real dialogue -- one that could
potentially be among the most important conversations of this entire
pandemic. After listening to his podcasts for a while now, I wanted to
know: Was Joe simply a sower of doubt, a creator of chaos? Or was there
something more? Was he asking questions that begged to be asked, fueled
by necessary suspicion and skepticism?
It wasn't what Joe Rogan thinks that most interested me, it was how he thinks. That is what I really wanted to understand.
Truth
is, I have always been a naturally skeptical person myself. One of my
personal heroes, the physicist Edwin Hubble, said a scientist has a
"healthy skepticism, suspended judgment and disciplined imagination, not
only about other people's ideas but also about their own."
0 comments:
Post a Comment