unherd | Not very long ago, the fear of being denounced as a transphobe meant
that doubts about extreme gender ideology were confined to private
WhatsApp groups and quiet conversations among friends. This is very much
no longer the case. Two weeks ago, the Times’s chief sports writer,
Matt Dickinson, wrote on Twitter, “Are we really talking about fairness in sport in the transgender debate – or fear and prejudice?”
Gender ideologues complain that this shift in public tolerance is
merely a conservative backlash against trans rights, but they are wrong.
What we are seeing is the inevitable result of trans activists – and,
most of all, Stonewall – pushing far beyond civil rights for trans
people and insisting instead on unpopular and unworkable policies, such
as trans women in sport, child transition and any open acknowledgement
of female biology.
The Tories have certainly not been spared from all this. On 30 March, at 2:48am, the Tory MP Jamie Wallis posted on Twitter to say that he’d been diagnosed with gender dysphoria
and would like to be trans. Suddenly, his long history of dodginess –
from running companies that attracted more than 800 complaints, to being
affiliated with a sugar daddy website, to fleeing the site of a car
crash – was instantly forgotten and his honesty and courage were
trumpeted to parliament’s rafters by, among others, the Prime Minister.
It was strikingly reminiscent of that time, in 2015, when Glamour
magazine named Caitlyn Jenner Woman of the Year, two months after she
was involved in a car accident in which a woman, Kim Howe, died. The
district attorney ruled there wasn’t enough evidence to convict Jenner,
but Glamour decided they had all the evidence they needed to
cite her as the year’s best woman. At least Caitlyn bothered to make an
effort: in the sobering light of day, Wallis tweeted, “I remain the same
person I was yesterday, and so will continue to use he/him/his
pronouns.” So no change at all, then, other than the identity of being
trans. Or wanting to be, anyway.
WaPo | Pregnant people who are vaccinated against the coronavirus are nearly twice as likely to get covid-19 as those who are not pregnant, according to a new study
that offers the broadest evidence to date of the odds of infections
among vaccinated patients with different medical circumstances.
The
analysis, based on medical records of nearly 14 million U.S. patients
since coronavirus immunization became available, found that pregnant
people who are vaccinated have the greatest risk of developing covid
among a dozen medical states, including being an organ transplant
recipient and having cancer.
The findings come on top of research showing that people who are pregnant or gave birth recently and became infected are especially prone to getting seriously ill from covid-19. And covid has been found to increase the risk of pregnancy complications, such as premature births.
The
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has been urging people to
get coronavirus shots before or during pregnancy, seeking to dispel fear
— widespread in some communities, without scientific basis — that those
vaccinations could be harmful. As of March, nearly 70 percent of people who werepregnant
had been vaccinated before or during their pregnancy, according to
federal data, though disparities persist among racial and ethnic groups.
The
new study goes beyond what has previously been understood, suggesting
that even pregnant people who are fully vaccinated tend to have less
protection from the virus than many other patients with significant
medical problems.
“If
you are fully vaccinated, that’s magnificent,” said a lead author of
the study, David R. Little, a physician who is a researcher at Epic, a
Wisconsin company that maintains electronic patient records for nearly
1,000 hospitals and more than 20,000 clinics across the country. “But if
you are fully vaccinated and become pregnant, you remain at higher risk
of acquiring covid.”
Little
said the findings buttress CDC recommendations that additional
precautions against the virus should be taken during pregnancy, such as
wearing masks and maintaining safe distances. He said the study also
suggests that health-care workers should “be on the lookout” for
symptoms and encourage testing to detect the virus early, when it is
easier to treat.
The
data also raises scientific questions that warrant further research
into how best to protect pregnant individuals and their babies from
infection, according to public health leaders and specialists in
pregnancy.
The
cauldron has already been formed. It is already complete: Russia has
destroyed all rail lines into Donbass, and now has full fire control
(artillery and air
power–especially drones) over all roads leading into the fortified
regions where the Ukrainian government had amassed its forces for the
planned ethnic cleansing of DPR and LPR. Nothing can get into
Donbass–nor can anything get out of it–without Russian consent.
All
Russia needs to do is wait, as the Ukronazis in the Donbass run out of
food and ammunition and are forced to surrender. If they refuse to
surrender, then
it’s simply a charge up the middle, pushing the massed Ukrainian forces
back to the Dnieper, all the while killing them in their bunkers with
“smart weaponry” and artillery, or along the roads as they try and flee.
Also,
that map Moulitsos is using is both spectacularly incomplete and just
as spectacularly inaccurate regarding the current deployment of Russian
forces. It
looks to be about a week old, maybe older (and it was incomplete even
then). For instance, the Russians as of mid-yesterday had already
advanced well beyond the fronts laid out on his map.
Finally,
his reasoning simply isn’t sound. The Ukrainian forces C3 systems have
been entirely wiped out, so there will be no means of coordinating
maneuvers of
any kind, much less flank maneuvers that will require a great deal of
detailed minute-by-minute intelligence–as well as a lack of ranking
officers to coordinate them. The fuel reserves of all of Ukraine have
been mostly destroyed, military transport has been
mostly wiped out, and there are two sustained and increasingly rapid
advances taking place from the east and north-east which are tying down
the vast majority of the troops that would be needed for the flanking
maneuvers he envisions (which are impossible,
now, for reasons stated above).
Now
that Mariupol has been taken, the troops there will likely be
redeployed and advance into Zaporzhzhia, parts of which are already held
by Russian forces.
Those freed up troops may also be deployed into Donestk. For the last
two days we’ve been seeing video coming out of Ukraine showing Russia
deploying fresh, top-tier weaponry (tanks, artillery, rocket/missile
systems, troop transports) into place for a sustained
attack from the east, north-east, and south-east.
Frankly,
Moulitsos’ assertion that Russian troops have been “shredded” is as
laughable a fantasy as is his assertion that Russian troops were
“defeated” at Kiev.
The Russian troops at Kiev were sent there to hold the Ukrainian troops
in place while Russia destroyed any means they might have to redeploy
to Donbass and relieve or resupply the troops in the east. Once Russia
had degraded Ukrainian transport, C3 capabilities,
anti-aircraft/artillery power, and armor to such a level that those
troops were no longer a credible means of relief or resupply, they were
withdrawn and redeployed in the east, in preparation for a full run to
the Dnieper.
The
Russian air force now has full control of the skies over all of
Ukraine, so I really have no idea where Moulitsos is getting this idea
that Russian forces
are “shredded.” Russia is clearly doing the shredding–or rather,
grinding–here, and doing it in a methodical, determined way with an
attention to detail that indicates iot will not end until their stated
political objectives are achieved.
From
the videos I’ve seen (50 or so, over the last three days) coming out of
Mariupol, the Russian forces seem to have excellent morale and are
conducting themselves
in a highly disciplined, professional fashion. There are lots of videos
coming out of mopping up operations by Russian forces–Kadyrov’s Chechen
urban warfare commandos particularly like to post videos–and Russian
morale appears quite high and determined. There
are also lots of videos of long lines and big crowds of civilians
welcoming the Russian forces in as liberators, thanking them for their
work and celebrating their arrival.
What
we see of the Ukrainian forces, they seem extremely demoralized. The
Ukrainians, in contrast to the Russians, have posted videos of the
torture and execution
of Russian POWs, with at least one high ranking commander bragging
about these executions in social media. The position of the Tochka
rocket booster that detached during flight just before it landed on the
train station certainly and undeniably demonstrates
the direction the missile arrived from: the Ukrainian side (false flag
to gain NATO sympathy, 50 dead ethnically Russian civilians).
Timelines, body decomposition, and photographic evidence of the massacre
in Bucha firmly determines those deaths as
having occurred well after the Russian withdrawal, reprisals by the
Azov battalion against Russian “collaborators” (apparently, anyone who
accepted food from the “occupiers”). The “mass graves” of which there is
so much talk were casualties–both civilian and
military–which occurred in the sustained fighting in that suburb over
the last two months, most likely from Ukrainian artillery, since the
Russians were positioned between the suburb and the Ukrainian forces.
Thus, the Ukrainians were firing towards the city,
and the Russians away.
Then
there are the interviews with citizens of Mariupol, where unspeakable
crimes against ordinary civilians are being described, such as the
purposeful and indiscriminate
shelling of entire neighborhoods, the locking of civilians in basements
while the Ukrainian forces set up firing positions in the house above,
the takeover of an old folks’ home where a firing position was
established on the roof and all of the residents were
locked up on the first floor–then fired upon with artillery once the
Ukrainians were forced to retreat–which seems to have been a pretty
common maneuver, since it has been described by several witnesses from
different neighborhoods. All of these tactics and
war crimes are totally consistent with actions of the Ukrainian
military against Donbass civilians going back to 2014.
There
have already been several mass surrenders of what appear to be two or
three thousand Ukrainian troops in Mariupol. The Azov battalion is,
along with its
foreign advisers, holed up underground in the Azovstal steel works,
which they (apparently) had earlier transformed into a command base.
Russian forces have sealed them in, cut off their water, and rumors have
it that fire trucks, cement trucks, and anything
that can carry water are being brought in with the aim of flooding the
ventilation system with water until the personnel inside finally decide
to surrender–or not. It’s up to them, after all.
What makes matters worse is Putin’s artificial timetable of a major victory in the Donbas by 9 May…
The
Russian forces have already achieved that victory in Mariupol, and the
mayor of that city has been told to begin preparations for a military
parade on May
9th. That is the first of the five major cities the Russian Federation
plans on liberating: Mariupol, Kharkhiv, Dniepro, Odessa, and Kiev,
perhaps in that order. Kadyrov unequivocally affirmed in an interview
today that the Russian federation would definitely
take the fight into Kiev.
The
plan, apparently, is to liberate everything east of the Dnieper and
turn that over to DPR and LPR control. There is some debate whether the
Russian forces
will continue their advance into western Ukraine; the people who I have
read tend to be divided on that based on their interpretation of what
Russia means by “denazification.” Some think that such a thing can be
negotiated and legally enshrined without capturing
the main players and putting them on trial, while others believe that
actual prosecution and trials are a necessity. I don’t know enough about
the situation to have any real opinion, but my WAG would be that yes,
Russia likely will fight into the West until
it gets a full surrender, whereupon it will hunt down the war
criminals, Nazi leaders, and Nazi funders it has identified, dictate the
terms of a new constitution, and guarantee a few more cultural reforms
are promulgated (textbooks, for instance).
USAWatchdog | The West needs World War III. They just need it. The real problem
here is they went to negative interest rates in 2014 in Europe. They
have been unable to stimulate the economy, and Keynesian economics have
completely failed. . . . I would say this
is mismanagement of government on a global scale. The problem is that
central banks have no control over the economy. Add to this, this type
of inflation is substantially different than a speculative boom. This
inflation is based upon shortages. These morons with covid . . . with
lockdowns, ended up destroying the supply chains. . . . Things that are
there, I buy extra of because next time it might be gone. So, everybody
is increasing their hoarding. . . . So, what we have with Europe, with
its negative interest rates, they have wiped out all the pension funds.
They need 8% to break even, not negative rates. There is not a pension
fund in Europe that is solvent at this stage of the game. . . . The
European government is collapsing. If they end up defaulting, you are
going to have millions of people down there with pitch forks storming
the parliament. So, to avoid that, they need war. . . . The Biden
Administration has deliberately destroyed the world economy.”
If there is war in Europe, the “U.S. dollar will get stronger
initially and not weaker” according to Armstrong. Armstrong also says,
“This is all deliberate. There is no return to normal here.
Unfortunately, this is where we are headed.”
Armstrong contends, war in Europe could break out in a couple of
weeks, and the EU and NATO are pushing this. Armstrong says, “They want
Russia to do something. . . . This thing with Russia is the same thing
all over again. Unfortunately, we are headed for war.”
Armstrong also talks in detail about the following subjects: Digital
currency and why the Deep State is pushing so hard for it; gold,
silver, food and just about everything going way up in price because of
shortages. Armstrong recommends that people “stockpile two years of
food.” Armstrong has other tips for what the common man needs to stock
up on; Armstrong also says President Trump is the only President he knew
that cared about U.S. soldiers dying in combat. This is why Trump
wanted to bring the troops home, and the Deep State warmongers hated him
for it. Armstrong also gives his predictions on who wins the midterm
election this coming November. Will it matter which party comes out on
top?
In closing, Armstrong says, “We are not getting back to normal. The
system is crumbling from within, and it’s just like the fall of Rome,
basically. (There is much more in the nearly 1 hour interview.)
rutherford | The U.S. ranks as the 12th most indebted nation
in the world, with much of that debt owed to the Federal Reserve, large
investment funds and foreign governments, namely, Japan and China.
Essentially, the U.S. government is funding its very existence with a credit card.
In 2021, we paid more than $562 billion in interest
on that public debt, which according to journalist Rob Garver, “is more
than the annual budget of every individual federal agency except for
the Treasury, the Department of Health and Human Services (which manages
the Medicare and Medicaid government health insurance programs), and
the Department of Defense.”
According to the Committee for a Reasonable Federal Budget,
the interest we’ve paid on this borrowed money is “nearly twice what
the federal government will spend on transportation infrastructure, over
four times as much as it will spend on K-12 education, almost four
times what it will spend on housing, and over eight times what it will
spend on science, space, and technology.”
Clearly, the national debt isn’t going away
anytime soon, especially not with government spending on the rise and
interest payments making up such a large chunk of the budget.
Still, the government remains unrepentant, unfazed and undeterred in its wanton spending.
Indeed, the national deficit (the difference between what the
government spends and the revenue it takes in) remains at more than $1.5 trillion.
If Americans managed their personal finances the way the government
mismanages the nation’s finances, we’d all be in debtors’ prison by now.
Despite the government propaganda being peddled by the politicians and news media, however, the government isn’t spending our tax dollars to make our lives better.
We’re being robbed blind so the governmental elite can get richer.
We’re not living the American dream. We’re living a financial nightmare.
In the eyes of the government, “we the people, the voters, the
consumers, and the taxpayers” are little more than pocketbooks waiting
to be picked.
“We the people” have become the new, permanent underclass in America.
thecradle | Sergey Glazyev is a man living right in the eye of our current
geopolitical and geo-economic hurricane. One of the most influential
economists in the world, a member of the Russian Academy of Sciences,
and a former adviser to the Kremlin from 2012 to 2019, for the past
three years he has helmed Moscow’s uber strategic portfolio as Minister in Charge of Integration and Macroeconomics of the Eurasia Economic Union (EAEU).
In another of his recent essays,
Glazyev comments on how “I grew up in Zaporozhye, near which heavy
fighting is now taking place in order to destroy the Ukrainian Nazis,
who never existed in my small Motherland. I studied at a Ukrainian
school and I know Ukrainian literature and language well, which from a
scientific point of view is a dialect of Russian. I did not notice
anything Russophobic in Ukrainian culture. In the 17 years of my life in
Zaporozhye, I have never met a single Banderist.”
Glazyev was gracious to take some time from his packed schedule to
provide detailed answers to a first series of questions in what we
expect to become a running conversation, especially focused to the
Global South. This is his first interview with a foreign publication
since the start of Operation Z. Many thanks to Alexey Subottin for the
Russian-English translation.
The Cradle: You are at the forefront of a
game-changing geo-economic development: the design of a new
monetary/financial system via an association between the EAEU and China,
bypassing the US dollar, with a draft soon to be concluded. Could you
possibly advance some of the features of this system – which is
certainly not a Bretton Woods III – but seems to be a clear alternative
to the Washington consensus and very close to the necessities of the
Global South?
Glazyev: In a bout of Russophobic hysteria, the
ruling elite of the United States played its last “trump ace” in the
hybrid war against Russia. Having “frozen” Russian foreign exchange
reserves in custody accounts of western central banks, financial
regulators of the US, EU, and the UK undermined the status of the
dollar, euro, and pound as global reserve currencies. This step sharply
accelerated the ongoing dismantling of the dollar-based economic world
order.
Over a decade ago, my colleagues at the Astana Economic Forum and I
proposed to transition to a new global economic system based on a new
synthetic trading currency based on an index of currencies of
participating countries. Later, we proposed to expand the underlying
currency basket by adding around twenty exchange-traded commodities. A
monetary unit based on such an expanded basket was mathematically
modeled and demonstrated a high degree of resilience and stability.
At around the same time, we proposed to create a wide international
coalition of resistance in the hybrid war for global dominance that the
financial and power elite of the US unleashed on the countries that
remained outside of its control. My book The Last World War: the USA to Move and Lose,
published in 2016, scientifically explained the nature of this coming
war and argued for its inevitability – a conclusion based on objective
laws of long-term economic development. Based on the same objective
laws, the book argued the inevitability of the defeat of the old
dominant power.
Currently, the US is fighting to maintain its dominance, but just as
Britain previously, which provoked two world wars but was unable to keep
its empire and its central position in the world due to the
obsolescence of its colonial economic system, it is destined to fail.
The British colonial economic system based on slave labor was overtaken
by structurally more efficient economic systems of the US and the USSR.
Both the US and the USSR were more efficient at managing human capital
in vertically integrated systems, which split the world into their zones
of influence. A transition to a new world economic order started after
the disintegration of the USSR. This transition is now reaching its
conclusion with the imminent disintegration of the dollar-based global
economic system, which provided the foundation of the United States
global dominance.
Claim that after the sinking of Flagship Moskva, the commander of the Black Sea Fleet, Admiral Igor Osipov, was violently arrested. Needs to be confirmed. https://t.co/thVNdhRBdd
A
news report from 2020 has given rise to the question of whether the
vessel sank with a Christian relic — a piece of the "true cross" —
onboard.
The Russian Orthodox Church announced in February 2020
that the relic had been delivered to the then-commander of the Black Sea
fleet, Vice Admiral Igor Osipov, and was at the fleet's headquarters,
ready to deliver it to the ship "shortly," the state-run Tass news agency reported at the time.
The relic in question is a fragment of wood just millimeters large
that, according to believers, is a piece of the cross on which Christ
was crucified, Tass said. That fragment is embedded in a 19th-century
metal cross which is itself kept in a reliquary, according to the
outlet.
The Moskva had a chapel onboard where sailors could pray,
Sergiy Khalyuta, archpriest of the Russian Orthodox Church's Sevastopol
District, told Tass. He said the fragment was to be transferred at the
request of its owner, an anonymous collector.
Insider was unable
to establish when the relic was finally transferred to the Moskva or if
it was onboard at the time of the vessel's sinking. The Russian embassy
in London did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
The sinking of the Moskva, a prized flagship, is a major blow to Russian morale, Western officials said.
dailymail | A top FSB intelligence official has been moved to a high security jail in Moscow as Vladimir Putin purges his secret services over the botched Ukraine invasion, say reports.
Col-General Sergei Beseda, 68, head of the 5th Service of the Federal Security Service (FSB), was previously under house arrest.
He
has now been placed in pre-trial detention in notorious Lefortovo
Prison, suggesting he will face major charges for intelligence failings,
it is claimed.
Beseda’s case is being investigated by the Military Investigative
Department of the Investigative Committee, said Russian intelligence
expert Andrei Soldatov, who revealed the Lefortovo move.
Beseda, in charge of FSB intelligence and
political subversion in the ex-USSR, had been on a trip to Ukraine
shortly before he was detained.
Putin
is said to fear that moles leaked invasion plans to the West, and Beseda
was detained along with his deputy Anatoly Bolyukh, but had been held
under house arrest until now. The current status of Bolyukh is unclear.
The Russian leader had been convinced by
secret services briefings that his troops would be welcomed by many
Ukrainians, and achieve a speedy victory. In reality they have faced
implacable opposition.
Lefortovo jail notoriously held political prisoners in the Soviet era and is routinely used to incarcerate suspected traitors.
Last month Putin also fired the deputy head of the Russian national guard.
Beseda
had been a longtime trusted Putin secret services official, and was in
his role as head of the 5th service of the FSB since 2009.
Russia has not confirmed his arrest or detention in Lefortovo.
wikipedia | The Nazis used the word Gleichschaltung for the process of successively establishing a system of totalitarian control and coordination over all aspects of German society and societies occupied by Nazi Germany. It has been variously translated as "co-ordination",[2][3][4] "Nazification of state and society",[5] "synchronization'", and "bringing into line",[5]
but English texts often use the untranslated German word to convey its
unique historical meaning. In their seminal work on National Socialist
vernacular, Nazi-Deutsch/Nazi-German: An English Lexicon of the Language of the Third Reich, historians Robert Michael and Karin Doerr define Gleichschaltung as: "Consolidation. All of the German Volk’s
social, political, and cultural organizations to be controlled and run
according to Nazi ideology and policy. All opposition to be eliminated."[6]
The Nazis were able to put Gleichschaltung into effect due to the legal measures taken by the government during the 20 months following 30 January 1933, when Adolf Hitler became Chancellor of Germany.[7]
In this atmosphere the general election of the Reichstag took place on 5 March 1933.[9] The Nazis had hoped to win an outright majority and push aside their coalition partners, the German National People's Party. However, the Nazis won only 43.9 percent of the vote, well short of a majority.[10]
Nevertheless, though the Party did not receive enough votes to amend
the federal constitution, the disaffection with the Weimar government's
attempt at democracy was palpable and violence followed. SA units
stormed the Social Democrats' headquarters in Königsberg, destroying the premises, even beating Communist Reichstag deputy Walter Schütz to death.[11] Other non-Nazi party officials were attacked by the SA in Wuppertal, Cologne, Braunschweig, Chemnitz,
and elsewhere throughout Germany, in a series of violent acts that
continued to escalate through the summer of 1933; meanwhile the SA's
membership grew to some two-million members.[12]
One of the most important steps towards Gleichschaltung of German society was the introduction of the "Ministry of Public Enlightenment and Propaganda" under Joseph Goebbels
in March 1933 and the subsequent steps taken by the Propaganda Ministry
to assume full control of the press and all means of social
communication. This included oversight of newspapers, magazines, films,
books, public meetings and ceremonies, foreign press relations, theater,
art and music, radio, and television.[23] To this end, Goebbels said:
[T]he secret of propaganda [is to] permeate the person it aims to grasp, without his even noticing that he is being permeated. Of course
propaganda has a purpose, but the purpose must be concealed with such
cleverness and virtuosity that the person on whom this purpose is to be
carried out doesn't notice it at all.[24]
This was also the purpose of "co-ordination": to ensure that every
aspect of the lives of German citizens was permeated with the ideas and
prejudices of the Nazis. From March to July 1933 and continuing
afterwards, the Nazi Party systematically eliminated or co-opted
non-Nazi organizations that could potentially influence people. Those
critical of Hitler and the Nazis were suppressed, intimidated or
murdered.[7]
Every national voluntary association, and every local
club, was brought under Nazi control, from industrial and agricultural
pressure groups to sports associations, football clubs, male voice
choirs, women's organizations—in short, the whole fabric of
associational life was Nazified. Rival, politically oriented clubs or
societies were merged into a single Nazi body. Existing leaders of
voluntary associations were either unceremoniously ousted, or knuckled
under of their own accord. Many organizations expelled leftish or
liberal members and declared their allegiance to the new state and its
institutions. The whole process ... went on all over Germany. ... By
the end, virtually the only non-Nazi associations left were the army and
the Churches with their lay organizations.[25]
For example, in 1934, the government founded the Deutscher Reichsbund für Leibesübungen, later the Nationalsozialistischer Reichsbund für Leibesübungen,
as the official sports governing body. All other German sport
associations gradually lost their freedom and were coopted into it.[26]
Besides sports, another more important part of the "co-ordination"
effort was the purging of the civil service, both at the Federal and
state level. Top Federal civil servants—the State Secretaries—were
largely replaced if they weren't sympathetic to the Nazi program, as
were the equivalent bureaucrats in the states, but Nazification took
place at every level. Civil servants rushed to join the Nazi Party,
fearing that if they did not they would lose their jobs. At the local
level, mayors and councils were terrorized by Nazi stormtroopers of the SA and SS
into resigning or following orders to replace officials and workers at
local public institutions who were Jewish or belonged to other political
parties.[27]
consortiumnews |One
of my reasons for joining Twitter was to contribute to the overall
process of engaging in responsible debate, dialogue, and discussion
about issues of importance in my life and the lives of others, in order
to empower people with knowledge and information they might not
otherwise have access to, so that those who participate in such
interaction, myself included, could hold those whom we elect to higher
office accountable for what they do in our name.
To
me, such an exercise is the essence of democracy and, for better or for
worse, Twitter had become the primary social media platform I used to
engage in this activity.
From
my perspective, credibility is the key to a good Twitter relationship. I
follow experts on a variety of topics because I view them as genuine
specialists in their respective fields (I also follow several dog and
cat accounts because, frankly speaking, dogs and cats make me laugh.)
People follow me, I assume, for similar reasons. Often I find myself in
in-depth exchanges with people who follow me, or people I follow, where
reasoned fact-based discourse proves beneficial to both parties, as well
as to those who are following the dialogue.
Before
my Twitter account was suspended, I had close to 95,000 “followers.”
I’d like to believe that the majority of these followed me because of
the integrity and expertise I brought to the discussion.
Having
someone hijack my identity and seek to resurrect my suspended account
by appealing to those who had previously followed me can only be
damaging to whatever “brand” I had possessed that managed to attract a
following that was pushing 100,000. When one speaks of injury, one
cannot ignore the fact that reputations can be injured just as much as
the physical body.
Indeed,
while a body can heal itself, reputations cannot. The fact that Twitter
has facilitated the wrongful impersonation of me and my Twitter account
makes it a party to whatever damage has been accrued due to this
activity.
It is not as though Twitter can, or ever will, be held accountable for such actions. Section 230 of the Communications Act of 1934,
enacted as part of the Communications Decency Act of 1996 (CDA), holds
that internet platforms that host third-party content — think of tweets
on Twitter—are not (with few exceptions) liable for what those third
parties post or do.
Like
the issue of Freedom of Speech, the concept of holding Twitter
accountable for facilitating the fraudulent misappropriation of a
Twitter user’s online identity is a legal bridge too far. Twitter, it
seems, is a law unto itself.
My
Twitter War came to an end today when I received an email from Twitter
Support proclaiming that “Your account has been suspended and will not
be restored because it was found to be violating the Twitter Terms of
Service, specifically the Twitter Rules against participating in
targeted abuse,” adding that “In order to ensure that people feel safe
expressing diverse opinions and beliefs on our platform, we do not
tolerate abusive behavior. This includes inciting other people to engage
in the targeted harassment of someone.”
This ruling, it seems, is not appealable.
At
some point in time, the U.S. people, and those they elect to higher
office to represent their interests, need to bring Twitter in line with
the ideals and values Americans collectively espouse when it comes to
issues like free speech and online identity protection.
If
Twitter is to be absolved of any responsibility for the content of
ideas expressed on its platform, then it should be treated as a free
speech empowerment zone and prohibited from interfering with speech that
otherwise would be protected by law.
The
U.S. Constitution assumes that society will govern itself when deciding
the weight that should be put behind the words expressed by its
citizens. Thus, in a nation that has outlawed slavery and racial
discrimination, organizations like the Klu Klux Klan are allowed to
demonstrate and give voice to their odious ideology.
America
is a literal battlefield of ideas, and society is better for it. Giving
voice to hateful thought allows society to rally against it and
ultimately defeat it by confronting it and destroying it through the
power of informed debate, discussion, and dialogue; censoring hateful
speech does not defeat it, but rather drives it underground, where it
can fester and grow in the alternative universe created because of
censorship.
In
many ways, my Twitter Wars represent a struggle for the future of
America. If Twitter and other social media platforms are permitted to
operate in a manner that does not reflect the ideals and values of the
nation, and yet is permitted to mainstream itself so that the platform
controls the manner in which the American people interact when it comes
to consuming information and ideas, then the nation will lose touch with
what it stands for, including the basic precepts of freedom of speech
that define us as a people.
Mainstreaming
censorship is never a good idea, and yet by giving Twitter a free hand
to do just that, the American people are sowing the seeds of their own
demise.
johnhelmer | A Canadian military veteran with NATO warfighting expertise analyzes
the operational map this way: “I believe that the Stavka is sucking the
Ukrainians in by leaving the east-west corridors open so they are none
too concerned, rightly or wrongly, about the deliveries coming from the
west. The Ukrainians are being drawn into the cauldron east of the
Dnieper River; this move is also fed by their deep belief in their own
propaganda – ‘we chased them away from Kiev!’ ‘We’ve stopped them in
Kharkov and the Donbass!’ ‘Mariupol is still resisting!’ They also
believe what their US trainers and advisers have been telling them is
the effectiveness of NATO weaponry and other support. The constant
nonsense about Russian weakness spouted by the media and politicians in
safe havens over here does them no good either. This attitude seems to
suit the Russians just fine.”
“One thing is certain – the Stavka is calling up very significant
reserves while the Ukrainians are scraping the bottom of the barrel
domestically and internationally in order to stiffen their lines. A huge
fight is certainly brewing now. Will there be a concerted attack on
Ukrainian logistics in concert with the offensive in the East? This is a
strong possibility. It also appears that the Ukrainians are feeling the
impact of fuel shortages due to the sea blockade and Russian strikes on
all fuel depots and stocks from the western borders to eastern hubs
like Dniepropetrovsk.”
“What happens when the Stavka says Go! and all those Ukrainians,
foreign white supremacists, and mercenaries get bottled up and
destroyed, despite the weapons deliveries? What happens when the major
US tactic for this war – the establishment of the proxy army flying the
SS and other fascist flags — is openly and soundly defeated in this
relatively short period of time – a very short period of time for a war
fought by a US-led army armed to better than NATO equipment, training
and readiness standards?
“What I am seeing are Russians rehabilitating civil authority, that’s
Russian authority from Kherson in the south to Sumy in the north. I
don’t believe the Galicians will end up with Odesssa or Kharkov and
Sumy. If and when the eastern army is destroyed, Zelensky’s regime may
collapse into infighting. He may be lynched or spirited away before the
Russians get there.”
A well-informed Moscow source with close contacts among the Donbass
leadership expects the future map of the Ukraine to become clear once
the next two major battles have been closed – the first for Kramatorsk,
the second for Kharkov.
The Russian plan, according to the Donbass leadership, is to reform
the Ukraine into “a loose confederation in which the controlling regions
will be the eastern Russian-speaking, Orthodox regions of Kharkov,
Lugansk, Donetsk, Zaporozhye, Kherson, Nikolaev, Mariupol, and Odessa.
They will be run by newly installed administrations and locally
recruited security forces, both controlled by Russia. Dniepropetrovsk,
Poltava and Kremenchuk are likely to be part of this federal alliance,
which will be strong enough to win the next Ukrainian presidential
election, replacing Vladimir Zelensky.” Zelensky’s term is scheduled to
end in March 2024. It is likely to end sooner.
The future for Kiev in this new federal polity is still undecided, the sources acknowledge.
According to the Donbass leadership, the future of Galicia in the
west is to become “a mini-federation of competing ethnic national groups
– Catholic Ukrainians, Hungarians, Slovakians, Poles, Romanians, and
others. Landlocked, without exportable resources except refugees,
mercenaries, and girls, blocked by Belarus to the north and Russia to
the east, the Galician gun platform which the US and Canada have created
around Lvov will be stripped of its political power in Kiev. Their
heavy arms, fuel stocks and command centres destroyed, they will be
motivated to turn their ideologies and their personal weapons on each
other. Between them and the east, this Russian plan for the
demilitarization of the country will prevent the return of mass threats
and NATO bases east of the Dnieper River.
The sources say this is not a plan for the breakup of the old
Ukraine, nor is it a plan for the accession of Novorussia. It is a
plan “to keep the Ukraine broken”, in which the big fracture lines will
be moved to the west — and kept there.
Attacking another State is
against the principles of international law. But one should also
consider the background of such a decision. First of all, it must be
made clear that Putin is neither crazy nor has he lost touch with
reality. He is a very methodical and systematic person, in other words,
very Russian. I believe that he was aware of the consequences of his
operation in Ukraine. He assessed – obviously rightly – that whether he
carried out a "small" operation to protect the Donbas population or a
"massive" operation in favour of the national interests of Russia and
the Donbas population, the consequences would be the same. He then went
for the maximum solution.
What do you see as his goal?
It is certainly not directed
against the Ukrainian population. Putin has said that again and again.
You can also see it in the facts. Russia is still supplying gas to
Ukraine. The Russians have not stopped that. They have not shut down the
internet. They haven't destroyed the electricity plants and the water
supply. Of course, such services may have stopped in fighting areas. But
you see a very different approach from the Americans, for example, in
former Yugoslavia, Iraq or even Libya. When Western countries attacked
them, they first destroyed the electricity and water supply and the
entire infrastructure.
Why does the West act in this way?
The Western approach – it is
also interesting to see this from the point of view of the operational
doctrine – is based on the idea that if you destroy the infrastructure,
the population will revolt against the unpopular dictator, and you will
get rid of him that way. This was also the strategy during the Second
World War, when German cities such as Cologne, Berlin, Hamburg, Dresden
etc. were bombed. They targeted the civilian population directly so that
there would be an uprising. The government loses its power through an
uprising, and you have won the war without endangering your own troops.
That is the theory.
What is the Russian approach?
It is completely different.
They have clearly announced their goal. They want "demilitarisation" and
"denazification". If you honestly follow the situation, that is exactly
what they are doing. Of course, a war is a war, and regrettably there
are always deaths in the process, but it is interesting to see what the
numbers say. On Friday (4 March), the UN reported 265 Ukrainian
civilians killed. In the evening, the Russian Defence Ministry put the
number of dead soldiers at 498. This means that there are more victims
among the Russian military than among the civilians on the Ukrainian
side. If you now compare this with Iraq or Libya, then it is exactly the
opposite with Western warfare.
Does it contradict the way the West represents the situation?
Yes, our media claim that the
Russians want to destroy everything, but that is obviously not true. I
am also disturbed by the way our media portrays Putin suddenly deciding
to attack and conquer Ukraine. The US warned for several months that
there would be a surprise attack, but nothing happened. By the way,
intelligence services and the Ukrainian leadership have repeatedly
denied such American warnings. If you look carefully at the military
reports and the preparations on the ground, you can see pretty clearly:
Putin had no intention of attacking Ukraine until mid-February.
Why did that change? What has happened?
You have to know a few things first, otherwise you won't understand. On 24 March 2021, Ukrainian President Zelensky
issued a Presidential decree to recapture Crimea. He then began to move
the Ukrainian army south and southeast, towards the Donbas. So, for a
year now, we have had a permanent build-up of the army on Ukraine's
southern border. This explains why there were no Ukrainian troops on the
Russian-Ukrainian border at the end of February. Zelensky has always
claimed that the Russians will not attack Ukraine. The Ukrainian defence
minister has also repeatedly confirmed this. Similarly, the head of the
Ukrainian Security Council confirmed in December and in January that
there were no signs of a Russian attack on Ukraine.
Was this a trick?
No, they said that several
times, and I am sure that Putin, who also said that repeatedly, by the
way, did not want to attack. Obviously, there was pressure from the US.
The US has little interest in
Ukraine itself. At this point, they wanted to increase pressure on
Germany to shut down Nord Stream II. They wanted Ukraine to provoke
Russia and, if Russia reacted, Nord Stream II would be put on ice. Such a
scenario was alluded to when Olaf Scholz visited Washington, and Scholz
clearly did not want to go along with it. That is not just my opinion,
there was also Americans who understood it that way: The target was Nord
Stream II, and one must not forget that Nord Stream II was built at the
request of the Germans. It is fundamentally a German project. Because
Germany needs more gas to achieve its energy and climate goals.
This
comes on the heels of new revelations of how deeply embedded U.S. and
NATO command structures (and troops) are in Ukraine. A French journalist
here describes what he saw in his time in Ukraine: https://www.bitchute.com/video/aVZeyycQgXBk/ (video with translations)
In
short, he says he was shocked to see American generals running the
entire show on the ground, and he says the names of them will be
revealed in his new exposé in the French Figaro newspaper this week.
This is further proof that this conflict is truly NATO vs. Russia, and NATO is losing badly.
Another report states: “the
United States is moving its advanced headquarters units to the western
borders of Ukraine. In particular, the 5th Corps is being relocated.
This suggests that it is not the General Staff of the Armed Forces of
Ukraine that controls military operations, but NATO officers. And we are
at war not with some puppet regime in Kiev, but with the collective
West.”
politico | Alleged and unconfirmed claims of
chemical weapons use by Russia in Ukraine has forced a scramble inside
the White House to match President Joe Biden’s promise of an “in kind”
response while avoiding further escalation of the conflict.
The White House is urging caution,
noting that the use of chemical weapons remains unverified. U.S.
officials, speaking on the condition of anonymity to discuss a sensitive
subject, said they have been running scenario-planning exercises on the
possible use of chemical weapons, having publicly raised the alarm that
Russian President Vladimir Putin may take such a step. The officials
said that military options in Ukraine aren’t on the table — echoing
Biden’s repeated position of not wanting to spark World War III.
The
word used by multiple U.S. officials who’ve been involved in
contingency planning for such an attack for at least a month is
“proportional,” meaning America and its allies intend to respond in a
manner befitting the potential war crime.
Instead,
some suggested America and its allies could impose further sanctions on
Moscow or further bolster Ukraine’s defenses with advanced weaponry.
Biden aides have also speculated that the use of chemical weapons may be
the final impetus for European nations to stop importing Russian
energy, funds for which have fueled Putin’s war machine and filled his
country’s coffers.
Before
doing any of that, the first step is to confirm a Ukrainian military
group’s charge that Russia on Monday deployed a chemical substance in
Mariupol. The Azov regiment,
a frontline fighting unit that has fought Russia in the Donbas since
2014 and has been tied to neo-Nazi groups and white supremacists, said
Russian troops dropped a chemical weapon from a drone and poisoned at least three people,
though the group said the affected soldiers are not facing disastrous
health effects. If true, that’d be the first known use of chemical
weapons in the war since Russia invaded Ukraine on Feb. 24.
RT | Russia’s Investigative Committee launched a criminal probe on Monday
over a Ukrainian social media advertisement, which called for violence
against Russian soldiers. The advertisement, shot in a distinctive style
resembling propaganda videos by Islamic State (IS, formerly ISIS)
terrorists, features the mock execution of a Russian soldier.
The
controversial post emerged on social media over the weekend, sparking
outrage in Russia. It features a woman, apparently portraying Ukraine,
delivering a hateful speech against Russians with a ‘prisoner’ in
clothes resembling the Russian military uniform kneeling by her side.
The actress accuses Russian “pigs” of mocking, oppressing and killing Ukrainians for a long time and states that the situation has now changed.
“Something
terrible woke up the peace-loving and grain-growing nation. Something
that has been dormant for centuries in the bowels of the Dneper banks.
Primordial and antique Ukrainian god. And now we’re reaping a bloody
harvest. Death awaits you all,” the actress states, ‘slitting’ the throat of the ‘prisoner’ with a sickle.
The woman also vowed revenge for the northwestern Kiev suburb of
Bucha, as well as for other Ukrainian towns and cities that allegedly
suffered at the hands of Russian troops. Ukraine accused the Russian
military of massacring civilians in Bucha early in April after troops
withdrew from the area. Moscow denied any involvement in the deaths,
insisting the whole Bucha affair was a staged “provocation” by Kiev to frame the country’s military.
The
woman who appears in the video has been identified as Andrianna
Kurilets, a small-time professional actress from the western Ukrainian
city of Lvov. The questionable ‘fame’ and media attention, however, have
apparently done little for the actress, as she has deleted her social
media profiles amid the fallout from the ad’s premiere.
Apart from the outrage online, the role also prompted a criminal probe by Russia’s Investigative Committee. The actress voiced “calls for violence against officers of the Russian Armed Forces,” the committee said in a statement on Monday.
thepostil | In cities like Kharkov, Mariupol and Odessa, the defense is provided
by paramilitary militias. They know that the objective of
“denazification” is aimed primarily at them.
For an attacker in an urbanized area, civilians are a problem. This
is why Russia is seeking to create humanitarian corridors to empty
cities of civilians and leave only the militias, to fight them more
easily.
This week, John Mearsheimer, speaking to @KatrinaNation, noted the continued alliance between DC and Ukraine's far-right:
"The Americans will side with the Ukrainian right... Both do not want Zelensky cutting a deal with the Russians that makes it look like the Russians won." pic.twitter.com/yxDOlEaBLG
Conversely, these militias seek to keep civilians in the cities in
order to dissuade the Russian army from fighting there. This is why they
are reluctant to implement these corridors and do everything to ensure
that Russian efforts are unsuccessful—they can use the civilian
population as “human shields. Videos showing civilians trying to leave
Mariupol and beaten up by fighters of the Azov regiment are of course
carefully censored here.
On Facebook, the Azov group was considered in the same category as
the Islamic State and subject to the platform’s “policy on dangerous
individuals and organizations.” It was therefore forbidden to glorify
it, and “posts” that were favorable to it were systematically banned.
But on February 24, Facebook changed its policy and allowed posts favorable to the militia. In the same spirit, in March, the platform authorized, in the former Eastern countries, calls for the murder of Russian soldiers and leaders. So much for the values that inspire our leaders, as we shall see.
Our media propagate a romantic image of popular resistance. It is
this image that led the European Union to finance the distribution of
arms to the civilian population. This is a criminal act. In my capacity
as head of peacekeeping doctrine at the UN, I worked on the issue of
civilian protection. We found that violence against civilians occurred
in very specific contexts. In particular, when weapons are abundant and
there are no command structures.
These command structures are the essence of armies: their function is
to channel the use of force towards an objective. By arming citizens in
a haphazard manner, as is currently the case, the EU is turning them
into combatants, with the consequential effect of making them potential
targets. Moreover, without command, without operational goals, the
distribution of arms leads inevitably to settling of scores, banditry
and actions that are more deadly than effective. War becomes a matter of
emotions. Force becomes violence. This is what happened in Tawarga
(Libya) from 11 to 13 August 2011, where 30,000 black Africans were
massacred with weapons parachuted (illegally) by France. By the way, the
British Royal Institute for Strategic Studies (RUSI) does not see any added value in these arms deliveries.
Moreover, by delivering arms to a country at war, one exposes oneself
to being considered a belligerent. The Russian strikes of March 13,
2022, against the Mykolayev air base follow Russian warnings that arms shipments would be treated as hostile targets.
The EU is repeating the disastrous experience of the Third Reich in
the final hours of the Battle of Berlin. War must be left to the
military and when one side has lost, it must be admitted. And if there
is to be resistance, it must be led and structured. But we are doing
exactly the opposite—we are pushing citizens to go and fight and at the
same time, Facebook authorizes calls for the murder of Russian soldiers
and leaders. So much for the values that inspire us.
Some intelligence services see this irresponsible decision as a way
to use the Ukrainian population as cannon fodder to fight Vladimir
Putin’s Russia. This kind of murderous decision should have been left to
the colleagues of Ursula von der Leyen’s grandfather. It would have
been better to engage in negotiations and thus obtain guarantees for the
civilian population than to add fuel to the fire. It is easy to be
combative with the blood of others.
thepostil | It was during this time that a distinct Ukrainian “identity” was also
fashioned, one which stated that the “real” Ukrainians were supposed
descendants of Vikings who set up Kievan Rus. There is no real
historical or genetic basis
for this designation, but it was a convenient merging with Nazi
ideology. In other words, in the “true Ukraine,” there were the superior
humans and the sub-humans. This “Germanic identity” of Ukraine would
have tragic consequences down to today.
The inevitable result of all this was mass slaughter of those that
were “undesirable,” the bloodiest of which occurred in June and July of
1941, all coordinated by Bandera, and in which some 9,000 people were
murdered (Jews, Poles, and “Muscovites”).
Given the success of this violence and thinking that he had the upper
hand, Bandera blundered and declared the Ukraine as independent, and so
was promptly arrested by his friends, the Nazis, who sent him off to
Sachsenhausen concentration camp, where he stayed until 1944, when he
was released to coordinate resistance against the Red Army, a task he
took up with renewed fervor.
After the war, the Banderites were reorganized by the British (MI6)
and the CIA, as a way to fight the Soviets. During this time, Bandera
moved about, often in disguise and in secret, and always protected by
the many members of the former SS, who had found convenient shelter in
Ukraine and who formed an extensive underground network.
During this time, Bandera and his organizations killed thousands;
some say hundreds of thousands; and all the while he worked closely with
the BND, the Federal Intelligence Service of what was then West
Germany.
Finally, Bandera was assassinated by the Soviets in Munich, in 1959.
But this did not end the deep influence of Hitler and the Nazis in the
aspirations of Ukraine nationalists—so much so that it is now difficult
to say where Nazism ends and Ukrainian nationalism begins.
In the new Ukraine, statues of Bandera are everywhere. He is the official, national hero.
Which Ukrainians?
In view of the above, it is important to note that theme of the
“Ukrainian people” is again at the center of the current Ukraine-Russia
conflict. In the West, this has come to mean an alliance with the
“Ukrainians” in order to defeat the Russians who are regarded as aliens
and who do not belong to “us.” Such is the legacy of Nazism in Ukraine,
in that people repeat its core tenet of the inferior Other, in their
“defense” of Ukraine. Russians are not “Western” and so must be fought
and defeated. That is the gist of the hysterical Russophobia that now
grips the West, where “innocent Ukraine” and the “bully Russia” has
become “settled science.”
Few in the grip of this hysteria seem to want to understand the
complexity involved, let alone the near-impossibility of separating
Ukrainian nationalism from Nazism—for the Banderites never went
away—meaning that the Ukraine was never de-Nazified. Rather, the
Banderites became inseparable from the country’s power-structures and
institutions. This relationship only intensified with the dissolution of
the Soviet Union when Ukraine became independent in 1991, and when
Ukrainian nationalism gained full legitimacy.
And the myth of a “superior, Germanic Ukrainian” was central to the
“new Ukraine,” which in turn was central to Euromaidan and what came
later—the relentless slaughter of the “sub-humans” in the Donbas
regions, as many have meticulously catalogued from 2014 to today.
And according to current Ukrainian law, there are two kinds of
“Ukrainians”—the “Germanic Ukrainians,” along with allied people, the
Tatars and Karaites (neither of whom actually live in Ukraine).
Then, there are the undesirable people, who are not legally
“Ukrainians.” These are the Slavs, and a few others like the Magyars and
the Romani who are denied the use of their own language in public. They
have to use the official “Ukrainian” language which officially has
nothing to do with Russian (!!).
This is the “Law of the Indigenous Peoples of Ukraine” which states
that only Germanic Ukrainians, Tatars and Karaites have “the right to
fully enjoy all human rights and all fundamental freedoms.” It was
signed into law by the current BFF of the West, President Volodymyr
Zelensky, on July 21, 2021. In other words, racial segregation of
society into the Uebermenschen and the Untermenschen.
This law is not an aberration; rather it reflects the widespread view of where Ukraine “belongs.” For example, in 2018, a book appeared
(which became a bestseller and won the Stepan Bandera Prize) in which
wide-ranging claims were made about ancient Aryan Ukrainians who
invented all kinds of things, including civilization itself. The book
was happily “reviewed” by three professors of history and philology at
Lviv University (Iryna Kochan, Viktor Golubko and Iosif Los).
Harpers | Ukraine is among the poorest countries in Europe and
the closest thing the continent has to a failing state. It is mired in a
smoldering conflict with Russian-backed separatists in its eastern
provinces, and its state institutions have been almost entirely captured
by competing oligarchs. Corruption pervades almost every level of
government. Outside Kyiv’s metro stations, elderly women in head scarves
and bedraggled war veterans beg for change, while nearby the streets
are lined with luxury shops and petty gangsters run red lights in black
SUVs without fear of rebuke. Millions have emigrated to Poland or Russia
for work. The capital has the uncanny feel, at times, of a postmodern
Weimar, where Instagram influencers brunch in cafés tricked out in the
international hipster style opposite billboards adorned with the faces
of Ukraine’s martyrs in the war against Russia.
But perhaps Ukraine’s clearest departure from the standard model of
European liberalism is its proliferation of armed far-right factions,
considered by analysts and ordinary Ukrainians alike to be the secretly
funded private armies of the elite oligarch class. They fought in the
trenches outside Donetsk and now patrol city streets, enforcing a
particular vision of order with the blessing of overstretched and
underfunded police departments. In some regions, they serve as official
election monitors.
Recruitment posters for these militias can be found across Kyiv,
calling on disenchanted veterans and disaffected youths to join them in
their mission to remake the world by crushing liberalism. To their
supporters, these groups are enforcers of the popular will, defenders of
the nation against Russian encroachment from the East and liberal
values from the West. To others, especially Ukraine’s Western-funded
NGOs, increasingly isolated outposts of liberal order, they pose a
serious and growing challenge to Ukraine’s social harmony, and,
ultimately, to the state itself.
The most powerful and ambitious of these militias is Azov. Like many
of the country’s armed far-right groups, it was founded during the 2014
revolution, when the Moscow-friendly autocrat Viktor Yanukovych was
ousted in bloody clashes around Kyiv’s central square, Maidan
Nezalezhnosti. More than one hundred protesters were killed in the city,
mostly by snipers from the elite Berkut police force, before Yanukovych
was overthrown and forced to flee to Russia. Amid the chaos, former
members of Patriot of Ukraine, a neo-Nazi paramilitary group,
established Azov. The militia first fought in the capital, then aided
the military in battles against Russian-backed separatist forces,
including the reconquest of the city of Mariupol. In November 2014, Azov
was officially integrated into the National Guard of Ukraine, with its
own armored units and artillery battery. Since then, it has built a
wide-ranging infrastructure of civil and military groups—including the
National Militia, an auxiliary police force—and spawned a variety of
summer camps, training centers, and veterans’ programs. In 2016,
Biletsky launched the National Corps. While they have thus far polled at
around 1 percent, their failure to generate electoral enthusiasm belies
their growing presence both on the streets and within the organs of
the state.
This spring, as the novel coronavirus triggered an economic crisis
across Europe, Azov capitalized on the uncertainty by pumping out a
stream of social-media propaganda that highlighted its humanitarian
efforts targeting poor Ukrainians. Azov press releases showed masked
volunteers disinfecting trams and common spaces in apartment buildings,
handing out packages of food to families and retirees under quarantine,
and delivering surgical masks to underfunded clinics and hospitals in
neglected provincial towns. “During this time, our Volunteers already
know better than social services who really needs help,” claimed
one post.
Volunteers are not shown on TV channels, but activists do their job
every day. We help those who really need it. Who needed it before
quarantine, and became even more vulnerable during quarantine.
National Corps members repaired crumbling orphanages, sewed face
masks, and plastered walls with advice on hygiene and social
distancing—making a show of performing basic services the Ukrainian
state was failing to provide. At the bottom of each press release was a
phone number and the exhortation join us! together we will overcome all difficulties!
A Foundation of Joy
-
Two years and I've lost count of how many times my eye has been operated
on, either beating the fuck out of the tumor, or reattaching that slippery
eel ...
April Three
-
4/3
43
When 1 = A and 26 = Z
March = 43
What day?
4 to the power of 3 is 64
64th day is March 5
My birthday
March also has 5 letters.
4 x 3 = 12
...
Return of the Magi
-
Lately, the Holy Spirit is in the air. Emotional energy is swirling out of
the earth.I can feel it bubbling up, effervescing and evaporating around
us, s...
New Travels
-
Haven’t published on the Blog in quite a while. I at least part have been
immersed in the area of writing books. My focus is on Science Fiction an
Historic...
Covid-19 Preys Upon The Elderly And The Obese
-
sciencemag | This spring, after days of flulike symptoms and fever, a man
arrived at the emergency room at the University of Vermont Medical Center.
He ...