thesaker | I have lived in the United States for a total of 24 years and I have
witnessed many crises over this long period, but what is taking place
today is truly unique and much more serious than any previous crisis I
can recall. And to explain my point, I would like to begin by saying
what I believe the riots we are seeing taking place in hundreds of US
cities are not about. They are not about:
Racism or “White privilege”
Police violence
Social alienation and despair
Poverty
Trump
The liberals pouring fuel on social fires
The infighting of the US elites/deep state
They are not about any of these because they encompass all of these issues, and more.
It is important to always keep in mind the distinction between the concepts of “cause” and “pretext”.
And while it is true that all the factors listed above are real (at
least to some degree, and without looking at the distinction between
cause and effect), none of them are the true cause of what we are
witnessing. At most, the above are pretexts, triggers if you want, but
the real cause of what is taking place today is the systemic collapse of
the US society.
The next thing which we must also keep in mind is that evidence of correlation is not evidence of causality. Take, for example, this article from CNN entitled “US black-white inequality in 6 stark charts” which completely conflates the two concepts and which includes the following sentence (stress added) “Those disparities exist because
of a long history of policies that excluded and exploited black
Americans, said Valerie Wilson, director of the program on race,
ethnicity and the economy at the Economic Policy Institute, a
left-leaning group.” The word “because” clearly point to a
causality, yet absolutely nothing in the article or data support this.
The US media is chock-full of such conflations of correlation and
causality, yet it is rarely denounced.
For a society, any society, to function a number of factors that make
up the social contract need to be present. The exact list that make up
these factors will depend on each individual country, but they would
typically include some kind of social consensus, the acceptance by most
people of the legitimacy of the government and its institutions, often a
unifying ideology or, at least, common values, the presence of a stable
middle-class, the reasonable hope for a functioning “social life”,
educational institutions etc. Finally, and cynically, it always helps
the ruling elites if they can provide enough circuses (TV) and bread (food)
to most citizens. This is even true of so-called
authoritarian/totalitarian societies which, contrary to the liberal
myth, typically do enjoy the support of a large segment of the
population (if only because these regimes are often more capable of
providing for the basic needs of society).
Right now, I would argue that the US government has almost completely
lost its ability to deliver any of those factors, or act to repair the
broken social contract. In fact, what we can observe is the exact
opposite: the US society is highly divided, as is the US ruling class
(which is even more important). Not only that, but ever since the
election of Trump, all the vociferous Trump-haters have been undermining
the legitimacy not only of Trump himself, but of the political system
which made his election possible. I have been saying that for years: by
saying “not my President” the Trump-haters have de-legitimized not only
Trump personally, but also de-legitimized the Executive branch as such.
[Sidebar: this is an absolutely amazing
phenomenon: while for almost four years Trump has been destroying the US
Empire externally, Trump-haters spent the same four years destroying
the USA from the inside! If we look past the (largely fictional)
differences between the Republicrats and the Demolicans we can see that
they operate like a demolition tag-team of sorts and while they hate
each other with a passion, they both contribute to bringing down both
the Empire and the United States. For anybody who has studied
dialectics this would be very predictable but, alas, dialectics are not
taught anymore, hence the stunned “dear in the headlights” look on the
faces of most people today]
Finally, it is pretty clear that for all its disclaimers about
supporting only the “peaceful protestors” and its condemnation of the
“out of town looters”, most of the US media (as well as the alt media)
is completely unable to give a moral/ethical evaluation of what is
taking place.
caitlinjohnstone | Wherever these videos emerge online you will inevitably see a deluge
of cop apologia (which I decided just now I’ll be calling copologia)
saying the footage is fake or the victim deserved it and the cop’s just
trying to get home to his family blah blah blah. There is not enough
gold in the earth’s crust to make the number of olympic medals these
people deserve for all the mental gymnastics they are performing to
excuse unprovoked, completely unnecessary acts of violence from public
employees whose job isn’t even statistically all that dangerous.
Most
of these copologists do not even know why they are falling all over
themselves to try and justify police brutality. It’s a conditioned
response, like turning your head when someone calls your name. They
don’t think about it, it’s just something they’ve been conditioned to do
by decades of media and cultural indoctrination into an empire whose survival depends on the existence of a violent and militarized police force. They hear Pavlov’s bell and start salivating, just as they’ve been programmed to.
The thing is, their creative energy is being spent entirely in vain. Police and their apologists have already lost the argument.
A
police force which cannot respond to protests about police brutality
without the internet being flooded with a steady stream of police
brutality footage is a police force in sore need of drastic overhaul. It
has already been proven that that is in fact the case. There’s no
taking it back. There’s no fixing it. It’s done. The debate is
officially over. Huge, sweeping changes must immediately be made, and
there’s no valid reason for the protests to stop until that has
occurred.
These videos have made it clear that the institution of policing in
America is completely sick from coast to coast, right down to its very
culture. The most obvious example I can point to is that watching just a
few minutes of the footage of police brutality
at these protests makes it undeniably apparent that a belief pervades
police culture that it is okay to physically assault someone who has
made you feel emotionally upset. Over and over and over again we see
police accosting civilians for saying impolite words to them or making
rude gestures, or not demonstrating an adequate level of subservience.
Over and over and over again we see an attack on a cop’s ego treated as
an attack on the cop himself.
This is absolutely ridiculous. These
are public servants. Imagine if teachers, mail carriers or DMV
employees were routinely assaulting anyone who spoke impolitely to them.
sciencealert | A giant, sprawling structure almost a mile long has been discovered at
the southern tip of Mexico, with researchers saying it may represent the
oldest and largest monument of the ancient Maya civilisation ever
found.
The site, called Aguada Fénix, is located in the state of Tabasco, at
the base of the Gulf of Mexico. It's so vast for its age, the find is
making archaeologists recalibrate their timelines on the architectural
capabilities of the mysterious Maya.
Before now, the Maya site of Ceibal (aka Seibal) was thought to be the oldest ceremonial centre, dating back to around 950 BCE.
Aguada
Fénix, which measures over 1,400 metres (almost 4,600 ft) in length at
its greatest extent, dates to a similar timeframe, with researchers
estimating it was built between 1000 and 800 BCE – but its immense size
and scope make it unlike anything found before from the period.
"To our knowledge, this is the oldest monumental construction ever
found in the Maya area and the largest in the entire pre-Hispanic
history of the region," the researchers, led by archaeologist Takeshi
Inomata from the University of Arizona, explain in a new paper about the discovery.
What's
even more staggering is that this huge, unknown structure has actually
been hiding in plain sight for centuries, seemingly unrecognised by the
modern Mexicans living their lives on top of the vast complex.
ancient-origins | Arkaim is a mysterious site located in Russia.
Experts believe the citadel, not necessarily the oldest feature of the
site, was built between the 17th and 16th century BC. But there are
several reasons why Arkaim stands apart from other Bronze Age
settlements in the area, leading to the idea it was built by a separate
group. There is controversy on exactly who the builders were and what
they made the site for and that uncertainty has led to some fascinating,
if unorthodox, claims.
Although it is unknown who built Arkaim, archaeological evidence
found at the site suggests that it was inhabited by people of the Aryan
race. Specifically, it has been suggested that Arkaim’s residents once
consisted of members of the Sintashta culture, Indo-Iranian people of
the ancient Eurasian Steppe.
The principal evidence for Aryans having lived at Arkaim is the
discovery of horse burials following their style. This practice is
described in ancient Indian texts and says that horses were buried with
their masters. Being nomads, many Indo-European peoples had a strong
connection to their horses and it’s not surprising for them to think
that the deep connection would continue into the afterlife. Evidence of
ritual horse sacrifices has been found in stone necropolises unearthed
in the Arkaim Valley.
Apart from its creators, another mystery is why the site was suddenly
abandoned. There is some evidence of a fire, however that may not have
been the cause of desertion. Because the site was fortified, some people
believe it was abandoned when the inhabitants lost a war. Skeletons
have been found at Arkaim and in the expansive necropolises of the
valley, but the human remains do not generally suggest death in battle.
A particularly interesting find of human remains was made at Arkaim in
2013 - an individual with an elongated skull. The person may have
belonged to the Sarmati tribe. Researchers believe that the alteration
was intentional; it was, after all, a common practice amongst some
groups who lived in the South Ural (it is also found worldwide).
Nonetheless, the reasons behind this ritual deformation are unknown;
leading some to see stronger ties between the curious site of Arkaim and
extraterrestrials.
asiatimes | We are in the middle of the proverbial, total fog of war. Those
defending the US Army crushing “insurrectionists” in the streets
advocate at the same time a swift ending to the American empire.
Amidst so much sound and fury signifying perplexity and paralysis, we
may be reaching a supreme moment of historical irony, where US homeland
(in)security is being boomerang-hit not only by one of the key
artifacts of its own Deep State making – a color revolution – but by
combined elements of a perfect blowback trifecta: Operation Phoenix; Operation Jakarta; and Operation Gladio.
But the targets this time won’t be millions across the Global South. They will be American citizens.
Quite a few progressives contend this is a spontaneous mass uprising
against police repression and system oppression – and that would
necessarily lead to a revolution, like the February 1917 revolution in
Russia sprouting out of the scarcity of bread in Petrograd.
So the protests against endemic police brutality would be a prelude to a Levitate the Pentagon remix – with the interregnum soon entailing a possible face-off with the US military in the streets.
But we got a problem. The insurrection, so far purely emotional, has
yielded no political structure and no credible leader to articulate
myriad, complex grievances. As it stands, it amounts to an inchoate
insurrection, under the sign of impoverishment and perpetual debt.
Adding to the perplexity, Americans are now confronted with what it
feels like to be in Vietnam, El Salvador, the Pakistani tribal areas or
Sadr City in Baghdad.
Iraq came to Washington DC in full regalia, with Pentagon Blackhawks
doing “show of force” passes over protestors, the tried and tested
dispersal technique applied in countless counter-insurgency ops across
the Global South.
And then, the Elvis moment: General Mark Milley, chairman of the
Joint Chiefs of Staff, patrolling the streets of DC. The Raytheon
lobbyist now heading the Pentagon, Mark Esper, called it “dominating the
battlespace.”
tomdispatch | This society has long suffered from a kind of Stockholm syndrome: we look to the rich for answers to the very problems they are often responsible for creating and from which they benefit. The wreckage
of this pandemic moment is a bitter reminder of this affliction, as
well as a signpost suggesting how we must emerge from this crisis a just
and more equitable nation. With a possible depression ahead and more
social unrest on the rise, isn’t it time to stop vindicating the wealthiest people
in this country and look instead to leadership from those who were
living in a depression before Covid-19 even hit and already organizing
and protesting?
Here’s a story from a long-ago moment that's still relevant. Two
months before his assassination in 1968, Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.,
travelled to Chicago, to enlist the women of the National Welfare Rights Organization (NWRO) -- the predecessor to the National Union of my day -- into the Poor People’s Campaign. As he walked into a conference room at a downtown Chicago YMCA, Dr. King encountered more than 30 welfare rights leaders seated strategically on the other side of an exceedingly large table. One of his advisers later noted that the women’s reception of the southern civil rights leader was a “grand piece of psychological warfare.”
Representing more than 30,000 welfare-receiving, dues-paying members, they had not come to passively listen to the famed leader.
They wanted to know his position on the recent passage of anti-welfare
legislation and quickly made that clear, pelting him with questions. Dr.
King felt out of his element. Eventually, Johnnie Tillmon,
the national chairwoman of the NWRO, stepped in. “You know, Dr. King,”
she said, “if you don’t know about these questions, you should just say
you don’t know and then we could go on with this meeting.”
To this, Dr. King replied, “We don’t know anything about welfare. We are here to learn.”
That day, Dr. King would learn much about the long struggle those women had waged for dignity in the workplace and the home. They taught him that programs of social uplift should be a permanent right and that the welfare system of the mid-twentieth century, much like our own, was structured as a public charity that callously differentiated
between the “deserving” and “undeserving” poor. They introduced him to
policy proposals that were generations ahead of their time, including a
demand for a Guaranteed Adequate Annual Income, or what many now call a Universal Basic Income (UBI).
Four months into the Covid-19 crisis, with this country already afloat on a sea of inequality
that would have been unimaginable even to those women in 1968, a sea
change in public opinion may be underway when it comes to what’s
necessary and possible. Ideas that only a few years ago would have been
considered unimaginable like universal healthcare, guaranteed affordable housing, and debt relief
are now breaking into the mainstream. Don’t think, however, that such
policy positions, like the idea of a UBI, have materialized on Capitol
Hill and in Beltway think tanks out of thin air. They are, at least in
part, the result of long-term agitating, educating, and organizing led
by the poor themselves.
Those of us in the welfare rights movement always saw our work as the kindling for a wildfire of organizing by the poor and dispossessed. Our projects of survival,
like Tent City, were not just about housing and feeding people. They
were also about securing the lives of those committed to building the
kind of movement necessary to transform society. Projects organized around immediate needs also became bases of operation for policy analysis and future plans.
aier | Coronavirus hasn’t been a thing since Friday,” said a friend. “The new story is racism.”
Following American media culture can make one’s head spin.
For three months, all we heard was the danger to life and
civilization presented by a novel virus. Millions will die! Few will be
spared! There will be unprecedented suffering unless we completely
shatter the normal functioning of life. Lock down, shelter in place, and
stand six feet apart – very strange exhortations never before heard in
the modern history of annual viruses or any public policy in many
lifetimes.
All of it enforced by the police power. The same police power that eventually landed on the neck of George Floyd.
They screamed that we had to close schools, shopping centers, sports,
and only allow “essential” business to function even if tens of
millions lose their jobs, because lives – lives that the police power
has utterly disregarded during the protests – are just that important.
Lockdown required that the law change on a dime, in violation of every
legal precedent, every slogan in American civic mythology, and
contradicting the whole of what made America great.
In three days in mid-March 2020, everything we previously believed
had to end because we had to implement a new experiment in social
control as cobbled together by “public health officials” some 14 years ago.
They sat around for a decade and a half, bored and waiting to use the
new way to combat viruses. Any old virus would do so long as it was a
slow news day. COVID-19 was as good an excuse as any. Out was every
foundational belief in liberty, property, and free association, in the
blink of an eye.
That was 75 days ago. People were surprisingly compliant, but what
could they do? They were scared, thanks to media frenzy, and they
weren’t allowed out of their houses to protest in any case. When they
did defy the orders to protest in front of capitol buildings, instead of
staying home and watching CNN, they were derided by CNN as disease
spreaders and enemies of public health.
I’m looking at the headlines today and all the news on the
coronavirus is below the fold or in its own section. It’s all about the
protests, riots, and looters. Racism. Trump is screaming for a crackdown
while the media demands justice for police brutality. As for social
distancing, this was absolutely yesterday’s news. Now a new ethos has
taken hold: gather in the largest possible groups to demand social
justice. And loot.
kmbc | After an emergency meeting of the Kansas City Board of Police
Commissioners, police Chief Rick Smith has been ordered to conduct a
review of the use of tear gas and other projectiles during the protests
at the Country Club Plaza.
Kansas City Mayor Quinton Lucas also
announced a series of sweeping changes into how KCPD investigates
itself, including creating whistleblower protections within the
department and creating a process where outside agencies will
investigate use of force complaints and officer-involved shootings.
In a related note, Lucas said he is signing a pardon order for Roderick Reed, the man who was cited for failing to obey a lawful order
by KCPD when he videotaped police arresting Breona Hill in 2019. Lucas
said he is also considering pardons on nonviolent offenses – such as
stepping off the sidewalk and not complying with a police order –
related to the protests.
“Accountability is always important for 21st century policing,” Lucas said. “It will be important in Kansas City.
“It
also recognizes that this moment is not about individual protests on
the plaza or in Kansas City. But, instead, how we can modernize
policing, how we can build trust between police and our communities, and
frankly, how we can help solve many of the challenges we have in Kansas
City’s violent crime.”
Lucas did reiterate that Smith “continues
to be our police chief and will continue in that position as we weather
our current crisis and also as we continue to address our issues related
to violent crime and the high number of homicides in Kansas City.”
With
the investigation into the police's use of tear gas against protesters
on the plaza, Lucas said he hopes the review will help the department
come up with policy approaches for the future.
"This is me
speaking personally," Lucas said. "Materials and other projectiles
should be used only in situations where there is an imminent threat to
the life of the officer or others in an environment. We had some
discussion on what future policies may look like speaking of groups once
again. And so it's our view that we wanted to allow the department to
come up with policy approaches for the use of tear gas and the use of
other projectiles."
The set of reforms Lucas laid out within the
department includes having all officer-involved shootings referred to
outside agencies, including the Jackson County prosecutor’s office, the
Federal Bureau of Investigation, the U.S. Attorney's office or the
Missouri Highway Patrol.
“All officer-involved shootings will be
reviewed by an outside agency – every one – even in situations where it
appears the officers conduct is justified,” Lucas said. “We will make
sure that there is an external third-party review that has a chance to
make sure that there is sufficient accountability for all.”
nakedcapitalism | Jokes reveal truths, which is why the best way to appreciate the real
Obama, not the fabled character of hope and change, is how he tells
jokes. He’s good at, no, great at telling jokes. He kills at comedic
performances, and his sense of timing is magnificent. Jokes, though,
show how someone really sees the world, and the joke I’m thinking of is
one he made during a speech in March 2009, when the revelations of AIG’s
massive retention bonuses became public. It had been less than two
months since Obama’s inauguration, but the major policy framework of the
administration – the bailouts – had been laid down. The AIG bonus
scandal was outrageous to the public, a symbol of tens of billions of
taxpayer dollars being funneled to an arrogant corporation that had
helped destroy the economy.
Barack Obama had stepped up to the lectern to deliver a stern rebuke
to AIG executives who had taken bonuses with taxpayer money. Obama
talked of the outrage of an irresponsible company, and how his
administration would do everything within its power to get the money
back. But a few minutes in, he coughed, slightly, choking a bit, as his
mouth was a bit dry. But after he coughed, he stopped, and reflected
on the gesture with a joke. “I’m choked, choked with anger”, he said.
Obama chuckled. Reporters laughed. And it was funny, really funny.
Because everyone in the room knew that Obama wasn’t actually angry
about the AIG bonuses, and never intended to do anything about it. No
one there was angry about the bonuses, and everyone knew nothing would
happen to AIG executives. The House would pass bills, which would die
in the Senate. The only people angry were Americans at large, who could
not believe that their government worked for Wall Street. So the joke
was funny, ironic, cool. But the moment wasn’t right for it, because
this was a serious time for outrage – so Obama quickly reverted to form,
and the teleprompter took over.
Pundits didn’t reflect on this “joke”. No one really noted it. It
was very much like George Bush’s comment to reporters that was only
later highlighted by Michael Moore, when Bush was on a golf course and
perfunctorily said “we must find these terrorist killers….” and then
turned to swing a golf club. “Now watch this drive.” Obama had risen
to that level of duplicity, not a lie in the conventional sense of
saying something that wasn’t true, but an entirely constructed false
persona.
He had polished the tools of the Presidency – the utter
banality of PR, the constipated talking points, the routine abuse of
power – and taken them to a new level with a self-aware sense of irony
about his own narcissistic dishonesty. His challenge was so outrageous –
I dare you to call me on what a liar I am as I joke about how much I am
lying to you right now – that he turned an obnoxious bluff into art.
Obama had shown this breathtaking tendency to con people as they knew
they were being conned before, the most public time during the campaign
being his cynical answer
when he was asked about his promise to renegotiate NAFTA. He had said,
when fighting for union votes with Clinton, “I will make sure we
renegotiate (NAFTA).” Even as he said this, it turns out that campaign
advisor Austan Goolsbee had gone to Canada to assure them this was a lie
(sure enough, Obama’s trade policies are identical to Bush’s, or
worse). And once the election ended, and Obama was asked about his
broken promise by a reporter, he gave the following answer.
“This is fun for the press to try to stir up whatever
quotes were generated during the course of the campaign,” President
Obama said during his Transition in early December, when a reporter
asked him about criticisms he and now-Secretary of State Clinton had
made about each other’s foreign policy views.
“They’re your quotes, sir,” said the reporter, Peter Baker of the New York Times.
“No, I understand. And you’re having fun,” Obama continued. “And there’s nothing wrong with that. I’m not faulting it.”
This is cynicism as art. It’s literally a Presidential candidate
running on hope and change saying that campaign promises are a joke and a
ruse. His comments on AIG were similarly dishonest.
caitlinjohnstone | If
you’ve heard the waking up story, you would expect no such thing. You
would understand that racial disparities never left the nation in
question, and that the establishment which still keeps J Edgar Hoover’s
name on the FBI building has no intention of doing anything about the
police force’s role in it. You would understand that the role of the
police is not to protect and serve the people but to protect and serve
the empire, in the exact same way that this is the role of the military.
You would understand that the empire is no more likely to voluntarily
dispense with the violent tactics of its increasingly militarized police
force than it is to dispense with its air force or nuclear warheads.
They’ll
supply all the empty words and take-a-knee photo ops you like, but
actually voluntarily disarming themselves against their subjects is not
something they’re planning on doing.
This
does not mean that those demanding these changes are being silly or
unreasonable; demanding that the police not murder you is the most sane
and reasonable thing in the world, per what the police force purports to
be and per what America purports to be. It’s just that neither the
police force nor America are what they purport to be. The bedtime story
and the waking up story could not possibly be more different.
That
is what we are witnessing here. We are witnessing the head-on collision
between the story America’s political, media and educational
institutions tell Americans about what their country is, and the reality
of what their country actually is. The disparity between the bedtime
story and the waking up story has finally been stretched to a breaking
point, and now the mask of free liberal democracy is coming off in front
of everyone.
We
are watching a population besieged by institutional racism, economic
hardship and a pandemic virus finally pushed past the breaking point,
and finding themselves crashing headlong into the most unyielding part
of a planet-sprawling empire. The stories are slowly clearing from the
air like tear gas, and the cold, hard reality is becoming exposed to a
greater and greater segment of mainstream America.
We
are all watching from around the world as the citizens of the hub of
the empire confront their oppressors in an increasingly violent battle
of wills. The violence rips apart the thin veneer of narrative that was
keeping the bedtime story intact all this time. We all watch as the
tattered ribbons slowly fall to the floor.
libertarianinstitute | Murray Rothbard pointed out in his book Anatomy of the State
how the state is far more punitive against those that threaten the
comfort and authority of government institutions and workers than they
are against crimes against citizens.
This, according to Rothbard, exposed as a myth the notion that the state exists to protect its citizens.
“We may test the hypothesis that the State is largely interested in
protecting itself rather than its subjects by asking: which category of
crimes does the State pursue and punish most intensely—those against
private citizens or those against itself?” Rothbard wrote.
“The gravest crimes in the State’s lexicon are almost invariably not
invasions of private person or property, but dangers to its own
contentment, for example, treason, desertion of a soldier to the enemy,
failure to register for the draft, subversion and subversive conspiracy,
assassination of rulers and such economic crimes against the State as
counterfeiting its money or evasion of its income tax.”
Boy how recent events have proven Rothbard right.
For weeks, we saw police aggressively pursuing and punishing peaceful people merely violating arbitrary lockdown orders to go surfing, cut hair, or host a child’s play date.
But in the first nights of the George Floyd protests, police allowed
rioters to run amok destroying property, with political leaders
dismissing the damage as unimportant.
This stark contrast in police responses dramatically underscores Rothbard’s point.
Reuters | Demonstrators hurled firebombs in a march towards the U.S. Embassy
compound in Athens on Wednesday in a protest over the death of George
Floyd in Minneapolis.
Reuters journalists saw demonstrators throwing several flaming objects
which erupted into flames on the street towards the heavily-guarded
embassy in central Athens and police responding with rounds of teargas.
The embassy itself was cordoned off with rows of blue police buses.
Demonstrators were holding banners and placards reading “Black lives matter” and “I can’t breathe”.
Police sources estimated the number of protesters at more than 3,000.
There is something being concocted in the dens of power, far beyond
the public eye, and it doesn’t bode well for the future of this country.
Anytime you have an entire nation so mesmerized by political theater
and public spectacle that they are oblivious to all else, you’d better
beware.
Anytime you have a government that operates in the shadows, speaks in
a language of force, and rules by fiat, you’d better beware.
And anytime you have a government so far removed from its people as
to ensure that they are never seen, heard or heeded by those elected to
represent them, you’d better beware.
What is unfolding before us is not a revolution.
The looting, the burning, the rioting, the violence: this is an anti-revolution.
The protesters are playing right into the government’s hands, because
the powers-that-be want this. They want an excuse to lockdown the
nation and throw the switch to all-out martial law. They want a reason
to make the police state stronger.
It’s happening faster than we can keep up.
The Justice Department is deploying federal prison riot teams to various cities. More than half of the nation’s governors are calling on the National Guard
to quell civil unrest. Growing numbers of cities, having just barely
emerged from a coronavirus lockdown, are once again being locked down,
this time in response to the growing upheaval.
This is how it begins.
It’s that dystopian 2030 Pentagon training video
all over again, which anticipates the need for the government to
institute martial law (use armed forces to solve domestic political and
social problems) in order to navigate a world bedeviled by “criminal
networks,” “substandard infrastructure,” “religious and ethnic
tensions,” “impoverishment, slums,” “open landfills, over-burdened
sewers,” a “growing mass of unemployed,” and an urban landscape in which
the prosperous economic elite must be protected from the impoverishment
of the have nots.
We’re way ahead of schedule.
The architects of the police state have us exactly where they want
us: under their stamping boot, gasping for breath, desperate for
freedom, grappling for some semblance of a future that does not resemble
the totalitarian prison being erected around us.
This way lies certain tyranny.
For just one fleeting moment, “we the people” seemed united in our outrage over this latest killing of an unarmed man by a cop hyped up on his own authority and the power of his uniform.
That unity didn’t last.
Indeed, it didn’t take long—no surprise there—for us to quickly
become divided again, polarized by the misguided fury and senseless
violence of mobs taking to the streets, reeking of madness and mayhem.
Deliberately or not, the rioters have directed our attention away from the government’s crimes and onto their own.
This is a distraction.
Don’t allow yourself to be so distracted.
Let’s not lose sight of what started all of this in the first place: the U.S. government.
fastcompany | As images from protests against police brutality in the wake of
George Floyd’s death have spread around the country, a key demand from
protesters has been the defunding of city police departments: that
cutting the money a city spends on police would, in fact, make
communities safer. They’ve pointed to the tactical gear and equipment
that the police have been pictured using as evidence that cities spend
far too much money on their law enforcement, at the expense of other
agencies that often lack funds to offer basic services to residents.
This
is an apt time to be making that demand, as cities are in the process
of figuring out next year’s budgets. But despite the fact that every U.S
city is being forced to make drastic cuts to existing programs in the
face of a stunning loss of tax revenue from closed businesses during
the COVID-19 pandemic, one area of city government is seeing virtually
no cuts at all: police departments.
Under New York mayor Bill de
Blasio’s budget proposal for fiscal year 2021, the NYPD—which currently
has a budget of $6 billion—would see a cut of just $23.8 million, or
0.39%, Gothamist
reported. In contrast, the Department of Education would have its
budget cut by $827 million—3% of its overall funding. The Department of
Youth and Community Development, which funds after-school programs,
literacy services, and summer youth work programs, would lose 32% of its
budget.
In a letter
to the mayor sent May 30, New York City Council Speaker Cory Johnson
and other council members called for every city agency to identify
meaningful savings they could make, so the nearly $9 billion budget gap
is made up with 5-7% cuts from each department, rather than
disproportionately larger cuts for a few agencies. “No proposed cut
should be one that would weaken the social safety net or hurt vulnerable
New Yorkers,” they wrote. An April
letter sent to de Blasio from the Communities United for Police Reform
pointed out that in 2019, when the city allocated $6 billion to the
NYPD, it allocated just $2.1 billion to homeless services, $1.4 billion
to housing, preservation, and development, and $1.9 billion to the
health department.
In Los Angeles, the LAPD budget is slated to actually increase
by $123 million. The proposed 2020-2021 spending includes nearly $41
million in bonuses for officers who have college degrees, “even as
thousands of other city employees face pay cuts amid a financial crisis
at City Hall,” the Los Angeles Times
reports, along with pay raises for officers. Overall, the current plan
increases LAPD’s budget by 7.1%, while it cuts the budget for the
Housing and Community Investment Department, which, per the Times, “sends inspectors to look for violations at apartment buildings,” by 9.4%.
LAPD
will receive just under 54% of Los Angeles’s total general fund—money
not raised or collected for special purposes such as voter-passed
measures—which allocates $1.8 billion to the agency. When you include
pensions and retirement, building services, liability claims, and “other
department related costs,” though, the total price tag of the police department tops $3 billion.
taibbi | Even as rates of both violent crime and property crime
have been decreasing steadily since the early nineties, rates of
incarceration have been exploding in the other direction. For most of
the 20th century the rate of incarceration in America was roughly 110 per 100,000 people. As of last year, the number was 655 per 100,000. Although the numbers have dipped slightly in recent years, down from a high of about 760 per 100,000 in 2013, the quantity of prisoners in America remains absurdly high.
Such
aggressive, military-style policing would be not be tolerated by voters
if it were taking place everywhere. It’s popular, and continues to be
embraced by politicians in both parties, because it’s only happening in
“those” neighborhoods (or, as Mike Bloomberg once put it, “where the crime is”). Even during the Covid-19 crisis, 80% of the summonses
for social distancing violations are given out to blacks and Hispanics.
Does anyone really think that minorities account for that massive a
percentage of those violations? Do they think black people really commit
3.73 times as many marijuana offenses as white people?
Basically
we have two systems of enforcement in America, a minimalist one for
people with political clout, and an intrusive one for everyone else. In
the same way our army in Vietnam got in trouble when it started
searching for ways to quantify the success of its occupation, choosing
sociopathic metrics like “body counts” and “truck kills,” modern
big-city policing has been corrupted by its lust for summonses, stops,
and arrests. It’s made monsters where none needed to exist.
Because
they’re constantly throwing those people against walls, writing them
nuisance tickets, and violating their space with humiliating searches
(New York in 2010 paid $33 million to a staggering 100,000 people strip-searched after misdemeanor charges), modern cops correctly perceive that they’re hated. As a result, many embrace a “warrior” ethos that teaches them to view themselves as under constant threat.
Police are trained to behave like occupiers, which is why they increasingly dress like they’ve been sent to clear houses in Mosul and treat random motorists like potential car-bombers – think of poor Philando Castile, shot seven times
by a police officer who leaped back firing in panic like he was being
attacked by Freddy Krueger, instead of a calm, compliant, educated young
man. Officers with histories of abuse complaints like Daniel Pantaleo
and Derek Chauvin are kept on the force because senior officers value
police who make numbers more than they fear outrage from residents in
their districts. The incentives in this system are wrong in every
direction.
The current protests are likely to inspire politicians
to think the other way, but it’s probably time to reconsider what we’re
trying to accomplish with this kind of policing. In upscale white
America drug use is effectively decriminalized, and Terry stops, strip
searches, and “quality of life” arrests are unknowns. The country isn’t
going to heal as long as everyone else gets a knee in the neck.
dcreport | There have been bipartisan efforts to unstrap the unnecessary
economic weights from the organization and to provide pandemic aid.
Trump, Mnuchin and Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) have all taken steps to block any such changes.
Trump could clear up his objections, as he appointed a majority of
the Postal Regulatory Commission. The commissioners must sign off on
deals like the delivery rates that Amazon pays. He also appointed the
entire USPS Board of Governors.
“It’s apparent that there are some folks for whatever their reasons
are opposed to the postal service,” Pete Coradi, national business agent
for the American Postal Workers Union, told DCReport.
There are two potential rationales for the ongoing attempts to break the agency.
One is that privatization would transfer enormous amounts of value.
There are untold billions in real estate, trucks, contracts and
intellectual property. There is high marketing value, if harnessed, to
tell which people and companies sent letters or packages to any
individual.
The other rationale would be to attack what is the third-largest
employer in the nation, with more than 600,000 mostly unionized workers,
historically allies of Democrats.
Although not considered federal employees, postal workers are eligible for federal health and retirement benefits. Push them into the private sector and suddenly there’s less of a burden on federal taxpayers, but not Americans.
Privatize the postal service and hundreds of thousands of workers
would be affected, potentially seeing worse benefits and pay. That’s
particularly bad for the African American community, which has
historically been heavily represented in the institution.
And by overloading the agency and then sinking it further, denying
the pandemic help freely handed out to large corporations, the GOP might
get its way.
theanalysis | The Federal Reserve is directly buying stocks, bonds, junk
bonds, mortgages, junk mortgages, all to prop up the value of assets
owned by the top 5%. This does not spur much new production or create
jobs. Michael Hudson joins Paul Jay on theAnalysis.news podcast
consentfactory | Things couldn’t be going better for the Resistance if they had scripted it themselves.
Actually, they did kind of script it themselves. Not the murder of
poor George Floyd, of course. Racist police have been murdering Black
people for as long as there have been racist police. No, the Resistance
didn’t manufacture racism. They just spent the majority of the last four
years creating and promoting an official narrative which casts most
Americans as “white supremacists” who literally elected Hitler
president, and who want to turn the country into a racist dictatorship.
According to this official narrative, which has been relentlessly
disseminated by the corporate media, the neoliberal intelligentsia, the
culture industry, and countless hysterical, Trump-hating loonies, the
Russians put Donald Trump in office with those DNC emails they never
hacked and some division-sowing Facebook ads that supposedly hypnotized
Black Americans into refusing to come out and vote for Clinton. Putin
purportedly ordered this personally, as part of his plot to “destroy
democracy.” The plan was always for President Hitler to embolden his
white-supremacist followers into launching the “RaHoWa,” or the
“Boogaloo,” after which Trump would declare martial law, dissolve the
legislature, and pronounce himself Führer. Then they would start
rounding up and murdering the Jews, and the Blacks, and Mexicans, and
other minorities, according to this twisted liberal fantasy.
I’ve been covering the roll-out and dissemination of this official narrative since 2016, and have documented much of it in my essays,
so I won’t reiterate all that here. Let’s just say, I’m not
exaggerating, much. After four years of more or less constant
conditioning, millions of Americans believe this fairy tale, despite the
fact that there is absolutely zero evidence whatsoever to support it.
Which is not exactly a mystery or anything. It would be rather
surprising if they didn’t believe it. We’re talking about the most
formidable official propaganda machine in the history of official
propaganda machines.
And now the propaganda is paying off. The protesting and rioting that
typically follows the murder of an unarmed Black person by the cops has
mushroomed into “an international uprising”
cheered on by the corporate media, corporations, and the liberal
establishment, who don’t normally tend to support such uprisings, but
they’ve all had a sudden change of heart, or spiritual or political
awakening, and are down for some serious property damage, and looting,
and preventative self-defense, if that’s what it takes to bring about
justice, and to restore America to the peaceful, prosperous,
non-white-supremacist paradise it was until the Russians put Donald
Trump in office.
In any event, the Resistance media have now dropped their breathless
coverage of the non-existent Corona-Holocaust to breathlessly cover the
“revolution.” The American police, who just last week were national
heroes for risking their lives to beat up, arrest, and generally
intimidate mask-less “lockdown violators” are now the fascist foot
soldiers of the Trumpian Reich. The Nike corporation produced a commercial
urging people to smash the windows of their Nike stores and steal their
sneakers. Liberal journalists took to Twitter, calling on rioters to “burn that shit down!”
… until the rioters reached their gated community and started burning
down their local Starbucks. Hollywood celebrities are masking up and
going full-black bloc, and doing legal support. Chelsea Clinton is teaching children about David and the Racist Goliath. John Cusack’s bicycle was attacked by the pigs.
I haven’t checked on Rob Reiner yet, but I assume he is assembling
Molotov cocktails in the basement of a Resistance safe house somewhere
in Hollywood Hills.
Look, I’m not saying the neoliberal Resistance orchestrated or staged
these riots, or “denying the agency” of the folks in the streets.
Whatever else is happening out there, a lot of very angry Black people
are taking their frustration out on the cops, and on anyone and anything
else that represents racism and injustice to them.
This happens in America from time to time. America is still a racist
society. Most African-Americans are descended from slaves. Legal racial
discrimination was not abolished until the 1960s, which isn’t that long
ago in historical terms. I was born in the segregated American South,
with the segregated schools, and all the rest of it. I don’t remember it
— I was born in 1961 — but I do remember the years right after it. The
South didn’t magically change overnight in July of 1964. Nor did the
North’s variety of racism, which, yes, is subtler, but no less racist.
So I have no illusions about racism in America. But I’m not really
talking about racism in America. I’m talking about how racism in America
has been cynically instrumentalized, not by the Russians, but by the
so-called Resistance, in order to delegitimize Trump and, more
importantly, everyone who voted for him, as a bunch of white
supremacists and racists.
Fomenting racial division has been the Resistance’s strategy from the
beginning. A quote attributed to Joseph Goebbels, “accuse the other
side of that which you are guilty,” is particularly apropos in this
case. From the moment Trump won the Republican nomination, the corporate
media and the rest of the Resistance have been telling us the man is
literally Hitler, and that his plan is to foment racial hatred among his
“white supremacist base,” and eventually stage some “Reichstag” event,
declare martial law and pronounce himself dictator. They’ve been telling
us this story over and over, on television, in the liberal press, on
social media, in books, movies, and everywhere else they could possibly
tell it.
So, before you go out and join the “uprising,” take a look at the
headlines today, turn on CNN or MSNBC, and think about that for just a
minute. I don’t mean to spoil the party, but they’ve preparing you for
this for the last four years.
libertyblitzkrieg | The pressure cooker situation that erupted over the weekend has been
building for five decades, but really accelerated over the past twenty
years. After every crisis of the 21st century there’s been this “do
whatever it takes mentality,” which resulted in more wealth and power
for the national security state and oligarchy, and less resources,
opportunities and civil liberties for the many. If anything, it’s
surprising it took so long to get here, partly a testament to how
skilled a salesman for the power structure Obama was.
The
covid-19 pandemic, related societal lockdown and another round of in
your face economic looting by Congress and the Federal Reserve merely
served as an accelerant, and the only thing missing was some sort of
catalyst combined with warmer weather. Now that the eruption has
occurred, I hope cooler heads can prevail on all sides.
I don't
think people understand the significance of the President declaring
"Antifa" a "terrorist organization".
The Patriot Act and provisions of the NDAA of 2012 make this
frightening. Because Antifa is informal it puts all protestors in
danger--like declaring them un-citizens.
On the one hand, you can’t pillage the public so blatantly and
consistently for decades while telling them voting will change things
and not expect violence once people realize it doesn’t. On the other
hand, street violence plays perfectly into the hands of those who would
take the current moment and use it to advocate for a further loss of
civil liberties, more internal militarization, and the emergence of an
overt domestic police state that’s been itching to fully manifest since
9/11.
It’s my view we need to take the current moment and admit the unrest
is a symptom of a deeply entrenched and corrupt bipartisan imperial
oligarchy that cares only about its own wealth and power. If people of
goodwill across the ideological spectrum don’t take a step back and
point out who the real looters are, nothing’s going to improve and we’ll
put another bandaid on a systemic cancer as we continue our
longstanding march toward less freedom and more authoritarianism.
While we aren’t going to solve everything at once, something should
be done as soon as possible to at least partially address current anger
and frustration.
Clearly there’s a major problem when it comes to policing in America,
particularly in poor inner-city communities. Let’s start by ending qualified immunity.
Rejuvenation Pills
-
No one likes getting old. Everyone would like to be immorbid. Let's be
careful here. Immortal doesnt include youth or return to youth. Immorbid
means you s...
Death of the Author — at the Hands of Cthulhu
-
In 1967, French literary theorist and philosopher Roland Barthes wrote of
“The Death of the Author,” arguing that the meaning of a text is divorced
from au...
9/29 again
-
"On this sacred day of Michaelmas, former President Donald Trump invoked
the heavenly power of St. Michael the Archangel, sharing a powerful prayer
for pro...
Return of the Magi
-
Lately, the Holy Spirit is in the air. Emotional energy is swirling out of
the earth.I can feel it bubbling up, effervescing and evaporating around
us, s...
New Travels
-
Haven’t published on the Blog in quite a while. I at least part have been
immersed in the area of writing books. My focus is on Science Fiction an
Historic...
Covid-19 Preys Upon The Elderly And The Obese
-
sciencemag | This spring, after days of flulike symptoms and fever, a man
arrived at the emergency room at the University of Vermont Medical Center.
He ...