johnhelmer | And what can be believed when, the day after Blinken’s remarks,
Victoria Nuland, the most psychopathological Under Secretary of State in
the record of the office, announced to the Senate Foreign Relations
Committee that she and Blinken are ready “in the context of Russia’s
decision to negotiate seriously and withdraw its troops from Ukraine and
return territories, I would certainly support that [easing of
sanctions].” Victoria Nuland said yesterday that the US is working on setting up a "judicial mechanism" to prosecute Putin, whom she preemptively declared guilty. Thus confirming that the US is pursuing regime change. If you're throwing Putin in prison, you're changing the regime by force
What Nuland meant by the Ukraine and the territories
to be “returned”, Blinken had disclosed the day before. Crimea,
Zaporozhe and “the land bridge that connects Crimea and Russia”, meaning
Kherson, Donetsk and Lugansk, will remain Russian and will not be
negotiated or “returned” because, said Blinken, “an assault on Crimea would be a tripwire for nuclear escalation.”
For the time being there has been no Russian acknowledgement of either Blinken’s or Nuland’s statements.
Listen now to the TNT Radio discussion of what is happening behind the scenes in Washington and Moscow – a breaking news story which has blindsided the mainstream media and also the alternative media.
Read the Blinken statement of Wednesday morning, January 25, and President Vladimir Putin’s response in the afternoon.
Here is the official text of Nuland’s opening statement to the Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearing on January 26; and here is what Nuland replied in answer to a question from Republican Senator Rand Paul on Russian sanctions. Rand then told Nuland the sanctions are a form of race war: “If we’re going to sanction people for their belief and, you know, their sort of nationalist version of the world, then we won’t have any, we won’t have any discussion between people or any legislative exchange. That would be about 90 percent of the people. I would venture to say that every member of the Duma probably supports Crimea. This is their perspective.”
0 comments:
Post a Comment