nypost | Exactly two years ago, on October 19, 2020, one of the dirtiest
tricks in electoral history was played on the American people by 51
former intelligence officials, who used the false alarm of “Russian
interference” to stop Donald Trump winning a second term as president.
Using the institutional weight of their former esteemed roles, they
signed a dishonest letter to mislead voters 15 days before the election,
claiming that material from Hunter Biden’s laptop published by the New York Post “has all the classic earmarks of a Russian information operation.”
In their expert opinion, “the Russians are involved in the Hunter Biden email issue.”
Russia was “trying to influence how Americans vote in this election …
Moscow [will] pull out the stops to do anything possible to help Trump
win and/or to weaken Biden should he win.
“A ‘laptop op’ fits the bill, as the publication of the emails are
[sic] clearly designed to discredit Biden … It is high time that Russia
stops interfering in our democracy.”
It was all a lie. Their letter was the culprit “interfering with democracy” in broad daylight.
Not one of the 51 had seen any material from the laptop or bothered asking for it, but their letter, instigated by, signed and delivered
to Politico by Democratic operative and former John Brennan aide Nick
Shapiro, killed the story stone dead. It got candidate Joe Biden off the
hook for the corrupt influence-peddling scheme his family had been
running through the eight years of his vice presidency.
The shameful letter was used by Joe Biden three days later, on October 22, to deflect Trump’s attack in their last debate.
“There are 50 former national intelligence folks who said that what
he’s accusing me of is a Russian plan … Four, five former heads of the
CIA, both parties, say what he’s saying is a bunch of garbage … You know
his character. You know my character. You know my reputation is for
honor and telling the truth … The character of the country is on the
ballot.”
Biden dismissed as a Kremlin smear all the evidence that was on his
son’s laptop of dirty money from China and Russia, of all his meetings
with Hunter’s overseas business partners, and all the lies he had told
about his involvement in Hunter’s business deals. The letter, like
the Steele dossier and Russia collusion hoax peddled by many of the
signatories, has helped fuel a moral panic about Russia in recent years
that now has heightened the risk of nuclear war.
As well as sharing their Trump derangement, the Dirty 51 sit on the
same boards and think tanks, speak at the same events or liberal TV
shows, write for the same publications, pal around with the same
journalists, retweet each other’s “Slava Ukraini” or Mar-a-Lago memes,
share hawkish views about regime change in Russia and are remarkably
sanguine about the prospect of nuclear war.
You would think since so many have been outed for their involvement
in the (non-existent) weapons-of-mass-destruction intelligence disaster
that justified the Iraq war, not to mention secret prisons, torture,
warrantless eavesdropping and the bulk collection of Americans’ data,
they might have learned some humility.
gizmodo | There is genuine news value to a story
along the lines of “These Are the Emails That Led to Twitter Suppressing
the Hunter Biden Laptop Story.” It is rare for a company as large and
valuable as Twitter to account so thoroughly for wrongdoing, perceived
or actual. The emails resemble the documents received in response to a
Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request. They detail internal drama at
a company whose power is on the order of a government agency, maybe
greater. BuzzFeed’s Katie Notopoulos tweeted, “Any news outlet would’ve
loved to have this scoop! It’s just not a ‘scandal’ as teased.”
Twitter’s
new owner considers it “the de facto public town square,” suggesting he
believes in a level of public accountability. Again, not unlike a
government agency. Though it is thrilling to receive once-hidden
documents in response to a FOIA, it is also possible that those
documents are boring, that they tell you what you already know. Such is
the case with the Twitter files. We learned how Twitter came to its decision to block the Post’s story, but we did not learn a shocking new reason why. We knew Twitter suppressed the story before the release of these documents, and, for the most part, we knew who was involved.
Those
people have since suffered professional punishment and left Twitter.
Vijaya Gadde, the former chief legal officer who played a “key role” in
the decision, according to Taibbi, was fired by Musk. Roth quit over
Musk’s “dictatorial edict.” Borrman left before Musk arrived. Jack
Dorsey, CEO at the time, is gone. When deciding to digitally quarantine
the Post’s story, did those people act out of fealty to Joe Biden and
the Democratic Party? Out of opposition to the Republican Party and
hatred for Donald Trump? Out of distaste for the New York Post? Judging
by the documents we have, we can’t say they did. Was it drastic
interference in the political process and the press? It was. We already
knew that.
Taibbi interviewed
several anonymous ex-Twitter employees on the decision, all of whom
expressed shock and outrage at the company’s actions: “Everyone knew
this was f–ked,” he quotes one source. But since Taibbi doesn’t quote
that expletive from the leaked emails, we can reason they included few
or no quotes as sensational for his purpose. Ergo, we can deduce that
those executives said little to support claims of nefarious purposes.
Outlets
far more vested in the Hunter Biden story than Gizmodo also seem vexed
by the release, and delivered the news below muted headlines. If the
story of Hunter Biden’s laptop belongs to any one outlet, it belongs to
the New York Post, which has never shied away from a blaring headline in
its 221-year life. Yet the Post’s two Friday-night notifications about
Musk’s actions were restrained. The first was a simple curtain-raiser
about Musk’s promise: “Elon Musk to drop Twitter files on NY Post-Hunter
Biden laptop censorship today.” The other was a “Read these
documents”-style headline: “Hunter Biden laptop bombshell: Elon Musk’s
Twitter drops Post censorship details.” Fox News’ push alert, delivered
via Apple News, read “Elon Musk drops bombshell docs on Twitter
censorship.”
Bombshell, bombshell, bombshell… what, exactly, is the bombshell? We’ve
yet to hear it explode. Maybe we’ve heard too much about this story,
and we’re missing the forest for the trees. Or maybe these documents
detail a decision where the outcome was already well-documented.
On
its website, the Post argues why you should care. Twitter is censoring
things willy-nilly and concocting reasons to do as it goes along, its
headline implies: “Hunter Biden laptop bombshell: Twitter invented
reason to censor Post’s reporting.”
And
yet, it is not shocking that Twitter used an ad hoc decision to
moderate a piece of content from one of America’s most infamous
tabloids. The social network had done that exact thing for years as it
struggled with toxic users—violent white nationalists, virulent
transphobes, harassers and bullies of all political stripes, et cetera,
et cetera, ad infinitum et ad nauseam. The company never had a handle on
content moderation, and it certainly doesn’t now, no matter how much Musk crows. Back in 2016, a lengthy investigative story
published by Buzzfeed showed how Twitter had been struggling with
abusive posters since its 2006 founding. Jack Dorsey and all his
executives made things up as they went along, just like Musk.
Lastly,
did the United States government run interference on a social media
company for the former vice president? That would be shocking indeed, a
bonafide bombshell. Musk himself said as much Friday: “Twitter acting by
itself to suppress free speech is not a 1st amendment violation, but
acting under orders from the government to suppress free speech, with no
judicial review, is.” That is true! And Taibbi once believed that is
what happened. In August 2022, he tweeted: “The laptop is by the far the
secondary issue. The real problem is the FBI stepping in to cut
distribution of true story [sic],” as pointed out
by Columbia professor and New York Times columnist Zeynep Tufecki. But
on Friday night, Taibbi rescinded the assertion: “There’s no
evidence—that I’ve seen—of any government involvement in the laptop
story.”
2. What you’re about to read is the
first installment in a series, based upon thousands of internal
documents obtained by sources at Twitter.
3. The “Twitter Files” tell an
incredible story from inside one of the world’s largest and most
influential social media platforms. It is a Frankensteinian tale of a
human-built mechanism grown out the control of its designer.
4. Twitter in its conception was a
brilliant tool for enabling instant mass communication, making a true
real-time global conversation possible for the first time.
5. In an early conception, Twitter
more than lived up to its mission statement, giving people “the power to
create and share ideas and information instantly, without barriers.”
6. As time progressed, however, the
company was slowly forced to add those barriers. Some of the first tools
for controlling speech were designed to combat the likes of spam and
financial fraudsters.
7. Slowly, over time, Twitter staff
and executives began to find more and more uses for these tools.
Outsiders began petitioning the company to manipulate speech as well:
first a little, then more often, then constantly.
8. By 2020, requests from connected
actors to delete tweets were routine. One executive would write to
another: “More to review from the Biden team.” The reply would come
back: “Handled.”
9. Celebrities and unknowns alike could be removed or reviewed at the behest of a political party:
10.Both parties had access to these tools. For instance, in 2020,
requests from both the Trump White House and the Biden campaign were
received and honored. However:
11. This system wasn't balanced. It
was based on contacts. Because Twitter was and is overwhelmingly staffed
by people of one political orientation, there were more channels, more
ways to complain, open to the left (well, Democrats) than the right. opensecrets.org/orgs/twitter/s…
Larry Johnson asserts that the Poles have had many casualties in Ukraine recently.
He points out an intriguing tangle, something like
how Monica Lewinsky saved Social Security – Is Sam Bankman the Fried a
bag man extraordinaire, now exposed? Quoting Johnson: “The United
States, by contrast, is exercising great caution.
Part of the reason for that hesitancy is the financial collapse of FTX,
which is exposing evidence that the Democrats, some Republicans, the
Ukrainians and FTX organized an elaborate financial kickback scheme. The
scheme involved promising members of Congress
who sent money to Ukraine a hefty contribution in turn from a Democrat
benefactor. In this case, the owner of FTX. ”
Others have hinted. Johnson is boldly connecting the dots.
One more money-laundering operation out of Ukraine,
that Epitome of Direct Democracy (and Deposits) of Central Europe?
Should I be shocked?
And was Hunter Biden involved?
Further down, I've embedded a long and readable (though unrollable) Jason
Choi twitter thread: “Here’s more information on the shady “Mind the
Gap” bundler operation founded by @SBF_FTX’s mother, Barbara Fried, and
led by @Stanford faculty, funneling millions
of dollars from Silicon Valley to the Democrat Party:”
If anyone wants to know what happened, send them this.
sonar21 | Tuesday marks the largest Russian bombardment of Ukraine with
precision guided missiles and drones. The Ukrainian equivalent of the
Pentagon reported was struck in Kiev. And Western media now is reporting
frantically that Russia fired a missile at a target in Poland. Russia
denies it vehemently and initial pictures of the “device” that landed in
Poland appear to show a S-300 anti-air defense missile.
The big unanswered question is whether this was an error, i.e.,
Ukraine fired at incoming Russian missiles and the S-300 missed its
target and fell inside Polish territory, or was it an attempt to
manufacture a false flag, i.e., blame Russia for firing the missile and
create a pretext to invoke Article 5 of the NATO treaty and bring the
rest of NATO into the war to stop Russia. The jury is still out.
Neither Poland nor the Brits appear inclined to wait for facts to
develop and are rattling swords about the need to invoke article 5 of
the NATO Charter.
The United States, by contrast, is exercising great caution. Part of
the reason for that hesitancy is the financial collapse of FTX, which is
exposing evidence that the Democrats, some Republicans, the Ukrainians
and FTX organized an elaborate financial kickback scheme. The scheme
involved promising members of Congress who sent money to Ukraine a hefty
contribution in turn from a Democrat benefactor. In this case, the
owner of FTX. Once the U.S. dollars were credited to Ukraine’s account,
President Zelensky and his partners diverted some of the proceeds to
purchase crypto currency from FTX. FTX, in turn, sent some of that funds
back to the cooperating members of Congress and the Democrat National
Committee. This scheme is unraveling. The dummies mistakenly believed
that crypto is untraeable. Nope. Thanks to block chain, eminently
traceable.
The Definitive Thread on FTX
I met SBF before FTX started, and witnessed their rise and fall. I can't stand @nytimes's puff piece.
If anyone wants to know what happened, send them this.
If article 5 is invoked because of the alleged attack on Poland then
we are facing a major, dangerous escalation of the war in Ukraine. A lot
of Polish troops have been killed in Ukraine over the last month and I
doubt the leaders in Warsaw are in the mood to negotiate.
Meanwhile, President Zelensky gave a schizophrenic speech about the missiles smashing throughout Ukraine.
On the one hand he acknowledges that the Russian missiles have
knocked out electrical power in many cities, which also affects the
ability to supply water and heat to more than 10 million Ukrainians. But
then he makes this odd claim, i.e., boasting that Western air defense
systems have shot down most of these Russian missiles. Really? Take a
look at these two successive missiles striking Kiev earlier today:
Zuckerberg stated on The Joe Rogan Experience that
“The FBI, I think, basically came to us – some folks on our team – and
was like, ‘Hey, just so you know, like, you should be on high alert… We
thought that there was a lot of Russian propaganda in the 2016
election. We have it on notice that, basically, there’s about to be some
kind of dump of that’s similar to that. So just be vigilant.’”
It is not clear why the FBI considered this type of media outreach
was part of its responsibility as a law enforcement agency. This was
before the presidential election and actively discouraged a major
platform to allow discussion of major allegations of corruption. The use
of the FBI for such a role gave Facebook officials ample cover to
expand their censorship operations.
The company only recently allowed customers to discuss the lab theory
of the origins of Covid after years of biased censorship. Facebook’s
decision to allow people to discuss the theory followed the company’s
Oversight Board upholding a ban
on any postings of Trump, a move that even figures like Germany’s
Angela Merkel and Sen. Bernie Sanders (I., Vt.) have criticized as a
danger to free speech. Even Trump’s voice has been banned by Facebook.
Trump remains too harmful for Facebook users to hear . . . at least
until the company decides that they are ready for such exposure.
Facebook has tried to get customers to embrace censorship in a commercial campaign despite its long record of abusive and biased “content modification.”
Zuckerberg just shrugged when pressed on his company effectively
joining the effort to kill the story before the election: “Yeah, it
sucks. It turned out, after the fact, the fact-checkers looked into it.
No one was able to say it was false.”
As with the earlier column on the CDC’s work with Twitter, there is a
growing concern over the use of such backchannels for censorship by
surrogates in these social media companies.
DailyMail | The FBI deliberately dragged its feet on the Hunter Biden
investigation and told agents not to look into the Hunter Biden laptop,
according to new whistleblowers who spoke with Sen. Ron Johnson.
Johnson,
R-Wisc., sent a letter to DOJ Inspector General Michael Horowitz on
Tuesday bringing forth the new whistleblower claims.
'Recently, my office heard from individuals with knowledge of the FBI’s apparent corruption,' Johnson said.
'After the FBI obtained the Hunter Biden
laptop from the Wilmington, DE computer shop, these whistleblowers
stated that local FBI leadership told employees, "you will not look at
that Hunter Biden laptop" and that the FBI is "not going to change the
outcome of the election again,"' Johnson wrote to Horowitz.
Johnson is demanding Horowitz look into the FBI's handling of the Hunter Biden laptop.
'While
I understand your hesitation to investigate a matter that may be
related to an ongoing investigation, it is clear to me based on numerous
credible whistleblower disclosures that the FBI cannot be trusted with
the handling of Hunter Biden’s laptop,' Johnson said.
'I
hope you understand that the longer your office stands on the sidelines
and delays investigating the FBI’s actions, the harder it will be for
you to uncover the truth and hold individuals accountable for
wrongdoing.'
Horowitz told Johnson in
February 2021 that the OIG would not investigate the FBI's handling of
the laptop so as not to interfere with the Department of Justice's
investigation into Hunter Biden's tax affairs.
The new claims come after whistleblower
allegations emerged in July that in the lead-up to the 2020 election the
FBI labeled the laptop as 'disinformation.'
In
October 2020, one month before the election, 'an avenue of derogatory
Hunter Biden reporting was ordered closed' by Timothy Thibault, a senior
FBI agent at the bureau's Washington Field office, Sen. Chuck Grassley,
R-Iowa, who fielded the whistleblower complaints, claimed in a letter
to FBI Director Christopher Wray and Attorney General Merrick Garland.
Thibault shut down the investigation despite evidence that some of the details were true, according to that whistleblower.
'Allegations
provided to my office appear to indicate that there was a scheme in
place among certain FBI officials to undermine derogatory information
connected to Hunter Biden by falsely suggesting it was disinformation,'
Grassley wrote.
stalkerzone | Economist Mikhail Khazin suggested that there is a connection between the shelling of the Zaporozhye Nuclear Power Plant
and the searches of former US President Donald Trump. In his opinion,
the American leader Joe Biden can be keeping a dangerous secret at the
facility.
According to Khazin, the shelling of the Zaporozhye NPP by the
Ukrainian Armed Forces may be directly related to the scandalous
searches at Trump’s house. The economist admitted that Biden, during the
period of vice-presidency and overseeing Ukraine under Barack Obama,
could have agreed with Ukraine and, possibly, Turkey to facilitate their
receipt of an atomic bomb. For this purpose, uranium enriched much
higher than the standards could be delivered to storage facilities on
the territory of the nuclear Power Plant. Under Trump, the plan could
have been covered up and its documents could have disappeared from the
White House, which seriously alarmed Biden and forced him to conduct
searches of his predecessor after the release of the nuclear plant by
Russia.
“Then a special operation begins, and the Russian army discovers containers sealed by Westinghouse
in a storage facility in Zaporozhye, where highly enriched uranium is
found. Please note that the IAEA experts have already tried to go there
twice, but the UN is blocking this trip. Russia, of course, could have
stolen this uranium, but then go and prove that it was not it who made
the false seal. And if the IAEA commission arrives, it won’t be possible
to get away with it,” Khazin said.
The Biden administration is very afraid of revealing the truth about
the storage facility at the Westinghouse nuclear power plant, so it
blocks any trip there by IAEA experts and tries to wipe the object off
the face of the earth with the hands of the UAF. If the theory is
confirmed, the US president will not be saved from impeachment even by
his Democratic supporters, the expert is sure.
“Somewhere,
Trump may have pieces of paper that were worthless until the
information about this uranium was widely available, but which will
become very expensive if this information gets out. If it turns out that
Biden violated the nuclear non-proliferation Treaty with his decision,
even the Democrats will vote for impeachment, because this is a thing
that the American establishment is terribly afraid of,” Khazin said on the “Interpretation” YouTube channel.
jonathanturley | New disclosures are demolishing the continued denials of President
Biden that he had no knowledge and nothing to do with his son’s business
interests. The emails (reviewed by Fox and The Daily Mail) include exchanges with at least 14 of Hunter Biden’s
business associates while Joe Biden was vice president. They cast
further doubt on the president’s repeated claims that he had no
knowledge of his son’s foreign business dealings. In one almost
plaintive email, Hunter actually complains to an associate that he had
delivered on everything that was demanded of him in getting access to
his father and the White House.
President Biden and the White House continue to repeat his denial
from the campaign trail in 2019: “I have never spoken to my son about
his overseas business dealings.” These denials have continued even
after an audiotape surfaced showing President Biden leaving a message for Hunter specifically discussing coverage of those dealings.
Some of us have written for two years that
Biden’s denial of knowledge is patently false. Indeed, it is baffling
how Attorney General Garland can ignore the myriad of references to Joe
Biden in refusing to appoint a special counsel.
People apparently were told to avoid directly referring to President Biden. In one email, Tony Bobulinski, then a business partner of Hunter’s, was instructed by Biden associate
James Gilliar not to speak of the former veep’s connection to any
transactions: “Don’t mention Joe being involved, it’s only when u [sic]
are face to face, I know u [sic] know that but they are paranoid.”
The new disclosures only add details to the the extent of his knowledge and involvement.
It appears that Biden met with at least 14 of Hunter’s business
associates from the U.S., Mexico, Ukraine, China and Kazakhstan over the
course of his vice presidency. That includes Hunter’s Mexican business
associates, Miguel Aleman Velasco and Miguel Aleman Magnani who visited
the West Wing on Feb. 26, 2014, and Joe was later photographed with
Hunter giving Velasco and Magnani a tour of the White House Brady Press
Briefing room.
Hunter is clearly eager to get photos as a deliverable for the
visits. In one email in April 2014 to David Lienemann, Biden’s official
photographer, Hunter asks “Do you have pictures from the lunch I had in
dad’s office (I think on 2/26) with Miguel Alleman [sic] Sr. And Jr. And
Jeff Cooper? If so let me know and I can send someone to pick them up.
Thanks. How was Kiev?”
And what choice did American security agencies have? They couldn’t stop Hunter, who had his father’s blessing. So they spied on both of them.
Ever since the days of J. Edgar Hoover, the FBI and the CIA have vied over
which could get the most dirt on presidential candidates, for use at
opportune times when presidents might be tempted to veer off the
straight and narrow path. What happened to JFK when he tried the
off ramp is always an instructive first lesson for incoming presidents.
“They” could’ve stopped hunter anytime “they” wanted. A little fentanyl in his drugs would have ended him once and for all, and no one would have questioned it. “Intelligence” assets are no strangers to such “solutions.” But “they” didn’t. Instead “they” let him stumble into some computer shop and turn over his loaded laptop to some random guy, in a mental state in which he “forgot” about it later.
Somebody knew what he’d done, and the laptop was allowed to languish for months on purpose, while the repair guy looked at what was on it to get this whole thing going. This story is inevitably framed as a “hamstrung, subservient” intelligence apparatus protecting the powerful and colossally corrupt biden family because they have no other choice.
But the real upshot is that the “intelligence” apparatus owns; lock, stock and barrel; the most feeble, inept, unpopular administration ever “elected,” and can bring it down at anytime. And despite the undeniable senility of the “president” and the gross incompetence of his pants-suit-wearing sidekick, any actions they take still pack the power of the presidential punch.
It seems to me that getting control of a barely alive “chief executive” lugging so much slimy, debauched baggage as Biden, is just the kind of thing that gets American “intelligence” operatives salivating. And portraying him as omnipotent enough to keep them in their place is just the kind of joke they like to tell the people they’re manipulating.
There’s been a “coup” alright, but it has nothing to do with the electoral college, or guys in Halloween costumes and MAGA hats seeking to “overturn” the “election.”
tabletmagazine | The
recent release of more gigabytes of images and information from Hunter
Biden’s laptop adds to the evidence that the all-out elite effort to
bury the scandal before the 2020 election wasn’t just to protect Joe
Biden, the preferred candidate of the American oligarchy. Sure, the
50-plus senior U.S. intelligence professionals who signed a letter
claiming the laptop’s contents were “Russian disinformation” wanted to
stop Donald Trump from sending angry tweets at them, but the laptop
suggests there was much more at stake.
The
U.S. spy chiefs who signed that infamously misleading letter—including
John Brennan, Leon Panetta, Michael Hayden, and James Clapper—had
directed America’s foreign intelligence services while Biden was vice
president and before that chair of the Senate Foreign Relations
Committee. They knew what his son Hunter was doing abroad, because it
was their job to know what foreign services know about leading U.S.
officials and their families, and how it might affect U.S. national
security.
But
none of these powerful and experienced men, presumably dedicated to
defending the national interest, lifted a finger to stop Hunter
Biden—and really, how could they? He was Joe Biden’s son, after all. And
by doing nothing about him, the pillars of America’s intelligence
community became the curators of the Biden family’s scandal.
When Trump started asking questions in 2019 about Hunter and his father, prompted by Joe Biden’s public comments
about protecting Hunter’s business associates abroad, it became clear
that the only way to contain the mushrooming scandal involving key U.S.
interests in Ukraine and China—a scandal whose magnitude they had known
about for a decade—was to provide the former vice president with all the
resources the U.S. government could muster. And that helped make him
president.
nypost | The FBI and Justice Department have been accused by “highly credible
whistleblowers” of burying “verified and verifiable” dirt on President
Biden’s troubled son Hunter by incorrectly dismissing the intelligence as “disinformation,” according to Sen. Chuck Grassley.
The ranking member on the Senate Judiciary Committee made the explosive claims Monday in an official Senate letter to FBI Director Christopher Wray and Attorney General Merrick Garland.
He insisted the allegations were so serious, they would prove — if
confirmed — that both offices were “institutionally corrupted to their
very core.”
The senator said that after his earlier concerns about Hunter Biden’s overseas business dealings, his office “received a significant number of protected communications from highly credible whistleblowers.”
The info was about the “FBI’s receipt and use of derogatory
information relating to Hunter Biden, and the FBI’s false portrayal of
acquired evidence as disinformation,” he wrote.
“The volume and consistency of these allegations substantiate their credibility and necessitate this letter,” he said.
The whistleblowers “alleged that the FBI developed information in
2020 about Hunter Biden’s criminal financial and related activity,”
Grassley wrote of the key run-up to Biden’s dad’s successful
presidential election.
“Based on allegations, verified and verifiable derogatory information
on Hunter Biden was falsely labeled as disinformation,” he wrote.
Such action continued until at least October 2020 — a month before
the election — when info was dismissed as disinformation even though it
was allegedly “either verified or verifiable via criminal search
warrants,” he wrote.
The assistant special agent in charge then “allegedly ordered the
matter closed without providing a valid reason” — and then “attempted to
improperly mark the matter in FBI systems so that it could not be
opened in the future,” he wrote.
As that information was falsely dismissed, efforts were made to
“smear” those investigating Hunter as being tied to “foreign
disinformation,” the senator wrote.
If these allegations are true and accurate, the Justice Department
and FBI are — and have been — “institutionally corrupted to their very
core to the point in which the United States Congress and the American
people will have no confidence in the equal application of the law,” he
wrote.
nzherald | Shocking new photos of Hunter Biden's drug-ravaged teeth and
a raunchy scene with a woman have emerged days after the President's
son released a "tell-all" memoir on his years as an addict.
Hunter,
51, described his years on crack and alcohol and numerous sexual
encounters with women in his autobiography Beautiful Things, published
this week.
The photos show his ruined teeth while sitting
in a dentist's chair, and Biden grinning with new dental veneers as he
pulls on the hair of a scantily clad woman.
The images reportedly were taken from his laptop which
allegedly has more than 250,000 text messages, emails, photos and videos
chronicling his controversial and troubled past.
Biden left the laptop at a computer repair shop in his father's home state of Delaware and never returned for it.
Another
photo appears to show Hunter asleep in a bed with a crack pipe next to
him, and another shows him on a bed with two naked women and a small
fluffy dog.
thesaker.is | The Ministry of Defence of the Russian Federation
continues analysing the military-biological activity of the USA and its
allies in Ukraine and other regions of the world in view of new
information received at the liberated territories
and at the branch offices of the Defence Threat Reduction Agency (DTRA)
that form a unified information network.
We have previously stated that the Ukrainian
project of the Pentagon do not meet the pertinent healthcare problems of
Ukraine, while their implementation has not led to any improvement of
the sanitary-epidemiological situation.
The special military operation has led to forming the final report on DTRA activity dated from 2005 to 2016.
The document contains the data on evaluation of
healthcare, veterinary and biosecurity system efficiency prepared by a
group of U.S. experts in 2016.
This report is a concept document designed for
further planification of military-biological activity of the Pentagon in
Ukraine that contains conclusions on implementation of the programme
guidelines.
Despite the more than 10-year-long period of
cooperation in the alleged '...reduction of biological threats...', the
experts have stated:
'...There is no legislation on the control of
highly dangerous pathogens in the country, there are significant
deficiencies in biosafety... The current state of resources makes it
impossible for laboratories to respond effectively to public
health emergencies...'
The document emphasises that '...over the past five
years, Ukraine has shown no progress in implementing international
health regulations of the World Health Organisation'.
The report pays particular attention to
non-compliance with biosafety requirements when working and storing
microbial collections.
It has been stated '...that most facilities are
characterised by numerous gross violations, such as unlocked fencing
systems, unlatching windows, broken or inactive pathogen restriction
systems, lack of alarm systems...' The results of
the review conclude that there is no system for protecting dangerous
pathogens in Ukraine.
At the same time, the activities of the Defence
Threat Reduction Agency (DTRA) have been assessed positively: the
organisation has managed to bring the national collection of
microorganisms to the United States, to organise biological assessment
work and to implement projects to study particularly dangerous and
economically significant infections that could cause a worsening
(changing) epidemic situation.
The report makes the case for continuing this work on behalf of the Pentagon that has cost more than $250 million since 2005.
The document is annexed with ambiguous comments
about the sponsors and implementers of the Biological Threat Reduction
Programme in Ukraine that have nothing to do with biosecurity issues. In
particular, the Soros Foundation is mentioned
with the notation '...contributed to the development of an open and
democratic society...'
It confirms again that the official activities of
the Pentagon in Ukraine are just a front for illegal military and
biological research.
We have repeatedly mentioned the role of U.S.
Democratic Party representatives in funding bioweapons activities in
Ukraine and the intermediary organisations that have been used for this
purpose.
I would like to refer to one of the key Pentagon contractors receiving money from Hunter Biden's investment fund, Metabiota.
The available data suggests that the company is
merely a front for internationally dubious purposes and is used by the
U.S. political elite to carry out opaque financial activities in various
parts of the world.
There is a specific example: Metabiota was involved
in the response to the Ebola epidemic in West Africa. The activities of
the company's employees have raised questions from the World Health
Organisation (WHO) in terms of their compliance
with biosafety requirements.
This is the report of the international panel of
experts from the Haemorrhagic Fever Consortium who were involved in the
fight against Ebola virus disease in Sierra Leone in 2015.
According to the document, Metabiota staff had
failed to comply with handling procedures and concealed the involvement
of Pentagon staff who were using the company as a front. The main
purpose of these activities was to isolate highly virulent
variants of the virus from sick and dead people, as well as to export
its strains to the USA.
In view of the apparent failure of Metabiota's
activities to meet the goals of controlling the spread of the disease,
the World Health Organisation's Ebola coordinator, Philippe Barbosa,
recommended to recall the staff of the company saying
he was extremely concerned about the potential risks of such
collaboration to WHO's reputation.
The U.S. military contractor's heightened interest
in the Ebola virus is not a coincidence: the disease is one of the most
pathogenic to humans. During the outbreak that began in 2014, 28,000
people were contaminated, over 11,000 of them
died, the mortality rate was around 40%.
The special military operation has led to receiving
documents that reveals the plans of Metabiota and the Ukrainian
Scientific-Technological Centre to study the Ebola virus in Ukraine.
This is the request for U.S. funding to diagnose
highly dangerous pathogens in Ukraine, including Ebola virus. This kind
of requests are part of U.S. strategy to redeploy high-risk work with
dangerous pathogens to third countries.
The research was to be carried out at the Mechnikov
Anti-Plague Institute in Odessa. As the disease is not endemic and has
never been recorded in Ukraine indeed, there is a legitimate question
about the need for such research and its true
purpose.
We have already noted that Ukraine and other
post-Soviet states have become a testing ground for biological weapons
not only for the USA, but also for its NATO allies; on the first place,
Germany. Various projects have been carried out
on behalf of the Joint Medical Service of the German Armed Forces.
Bundeswehr professionals paid particular attention
to the Congo-Crimean fever pathogen. A large-scale screening of the
susceptibility of the local population to this infection was carried out
and included summarising demographic, epidemiological
and clinical data. This kind of approaches allows to identify new
regional virus genotypes and to select strains that cause latent
clinical forms.
The study of natural foci of Crimean-Congo fever
was carried out under the pretext of improving the Ukrainian
epidemiological surveillance system, with the participation of the
Institute of Veterinary Medicine in Kiev and the Mechnikov
Anti-Plague Institute in Odessa.
Bundeswehr's interest in Crimean-Congo fever stems
from the fact that mortality can be as high as 30% and its outbreaks
create a need for lengthy and costly treatment, preventive and special
handling measures.
This is a quote from Bundeswehr's instructions:
'...pay particular attention to fatal cases of infection with
Crimean-Congo fever as it allows the virus strains with maximum
pathogenicity and virulence for humans to be extracted from the
dead individuals...'
Apart from Germany, microbiologists from the USA
have shown a keen interest in tick-borne infections; research in this
area has been funded by DTRA through the UP-1 and UP-8 projects.
A separate project on ixodid ticks that are vectors
of a number of highly dangerous infections (tularemia, West Nile fever,
Congo-Crimean fever) has been implemented by the University of Texas.
Ticks used to be collected in the south-eastern
regions of Ukraine, where natural foci of infections characteristic of
the territory of the Russian Federation are located. At the same time,
the period of implementing this work coincided
with a rapid increase in the incidence of tick-borne borreliosis among
the Ukrainian population, as well as the increase in the number of ticks
in various regions of Russia bordering Ukraine.
This issue is being studied by competent Russian
professionals in coordination with professionals from the Ministry of
Defence of Russia.
We have previously pointed out the significance of
the results of the military-biological projects codenamed UP for the
Pentagon.
Note the report prepared for the U.S. Defence
Department by Black & Veatch and Metabiota. According to the
document, Veterinary Projects codenamed 'TAP' were implemented
simultaneously with the UP projects in Ukraine.
Their main guideline lies in economically
significant quarantine infections capable of damaging the agriculture of
several countries and entire regions, such as glanders, African swine
fever (ASF), classical swine fever, highly pathogenic
avian influenza and Newcastle disease.
African swine fever with two projects dedicated to this pathogen represented particular interest to U.S. military biologists.
The TAP-3 project was aimed to study the spread of
ASF pathogen through wild animals. The migration routes of wild boar
through Ukraine had been examining within its framework. The TAP-6
project scaled this process up to Eastern European
countries.
The study of vector populations of dangerous
zoonotic infections was carried out by staff of the Institute of New
Pathogens of the University of Florida (Gainesville) in Volyn, Rovno,
Zhitomir and Chernigov regions of Ukraine, as well as
in the areas bordering Belarus and Russia.
Note the worsening situation of African swine fever
in Eastern European countries: According to the International Office of
Epizootics, since 2014, outbreaks have been recorded in Latvia (4,021
cases), Estonia (3,814) and Lithuania (4,201).
In Poland, more than 13,000 cases of ASF have been detected, and
agricultural losses from the disease have exceeded 2.4 billion euro.
We have already emphasised the use of biological
weapons in Cuba in the 1970s and 1980s. Today, I would like to focus on
U.S. military-biological activities during the Korean War.
In March 2022, the U.S. Army Strategic Studies
Institute published a report on the U.S. chemical and biological weapons
programme during the Korean War. This report was aimed to create a
possible line of defence against allegations of illegal
activities carried out by U.S. biolaboratories in Ukraine.
The document attempts to refute the testimony of 38
U.S. military pilots who have admitted using biological weapons in
China and Korea.
According to the document, while preparing for the
Korean campaign, '...the U.S. Air Force secured additional funds to
purchase large quantities of chemical and biological munitions, obtained
a testing range for them in Canada and carried
out an extensive conceptual work on their use...'
At that time, the Americans considered brucellosis
pathogens and economically important infections, including wheat stem
rust, as priority biological agents. 2,500 munitions of this type the
U.S. Air Force Strategic Air Command planned
to use, including '...to attack Soviet grain crops...'
Analysis of the data mentioned in the report shows
that the U.S. command uses the results of the research received from the
Japanese military-biological programme and a certain 'continuity' of
the works previously carried out by the Detachment
731 led by Shiro Ishii.
This is the record of the closed session of CIA,
State Department and the Pentagon representatives dated July 7, 1953.
The document clearly shows that the Americans are focusing on techniques
to manipulate public opinion and launch an aggressive
counter-attack within their strategies aimed to defend from
allegations.
The report states that the officials are reluctant
to actual investigations of chemical and biological incidents due to
fears of revealing the activities carried out by the U.S. Eighth Army.
Thus, the comparative analysis of U.S. activities
during the Korean War and currently in Ukraine demonstrates the
persistence of the U.S. policy of building up its own military and
biological capabilities in circumvention of international
agreements.
In conclusion, I would like to present real data on
the health condition of the voluntarily surrendered Ukrainian
servicemen. This diapositive presents the data on presence of antibodies
to contagious disease agents without mentioning personal
data of these servicemen.
The results are as follows: 33% of the examined
servicemen had had hepatitis A, over 4% had renal syndrome fever and 20%
had West Nile fever. The figures are significantly higher than the
statistical average. In view of active research
of these diseases held by the Pentagon within the Ukrainian projects,
there is reason to believe that servicemen of the Armed Forces of
Ukraine (AFU) were involved as volunteers in experiments to assess the
tolerance of dangerous infectious diseases.
The lack of therapeutic effect of antibacterial
medication has been reported during in-patient treatment of AFU
servicemen in medical facilities. High concentrations of antibiotics,
including sulphonyl amides and fluoroquinolones, have
been detected in their blood.
This fact may indicate preventive use of
antibiotics and preparation of personnel for operating in conditions of
biological contamination, such as cholera agent, that indirectly proves
the information of the Russian Defence Ministry that
Ukrainian special units were planning to use biological agents.
The data will be included in the U.S. military-biological dossier and we will continue to examine it and keep you informed.
Metabiota harnesses data science, provides analytical tools, and delivers hands-on support, helping governments and businesses around the world mitigate and transfer the health and economic risks posed by infectious disease. The company is widely recognized in the public and private sectors, having helped to push the boundaries of insuring catastrophic risks, preparing for infectious disease threats, and catalysing public-private partnerships to protect global health security.
"During a briefing on the findings of the Russian Defense Ministry’s
investigation into the purportedly US-funded bioweapon labs in Ukraine,
Chief of Russia’s Radioactive, Chemical, and Biological Protection
Forces Lieutenant General Igor Kirillov made several
statements:
The special military operation of the Russian Armed
Forces made it possible to stop criminal experiments on civilians of
Ukraine;
Ukraine is a training ground for the West for the development of
biological weapons components and testing of new samples of
pharmaceuticals;
The Russian Ministry of Defense has information about the Pentagon's
experiments on Ukrainian citizens in a psychiatric hospital near
Kharkov;
The United States tried to hide their participation in biological experiments on patients of a psychiatric hospital in Ukraine;
Fake money distributed in 2020 in the LPR were infected with a strain of tuberculosis resistant to anti-tuberculosis drugs;
Collection of biomaterials from Ukrainians by epidemiologists of a
Bundeswehr Institute confirms the military focus of research in Ukraine;
The information available to the Russian Defense Ministry confirms the
implementation of the US offensive military biological program in
Ukraine;
The leaders of the Democratic Party are the ideologists of the US military-biological activities in Ukraine;
Pfizer, Moderna, Merck and other pharmaceutical companies are involved in US military biological activities in Ukraine;
Military biological projects on the territory of Ukraine, in addition to
the United States, are being implemented by Germany and Poland;
US specialists are testing new drugs bypassing international safety standards, reducing the cost of research;
Ukrainian government agencies are involved in military biological activities in the country along with Pentagon contractors;
At the end of April, ten more UAVs were found in the area of Kakhovka,
equipped with containers and equipment for spraying biorecipes.
Russian forces had obtained evidence suggesting Kiev attempted to infect residents of the Slavyanoserbsk district of the Lugansk People’s Republic (LPR) with a highly pathogenic strain of tuberculosis in 2020.
“Leaflets made in the form of counterfeit banknotes were infected with the causative agent of tuberculosis and distributed among minors in the village of Stepovoe,” Kirillov said, adding that the organizers of this crime took into account the behavior of children, which includes “putting things in their mouth” and handling food without washing their hands.
"Kirillov stated that the results of the bacteriological studies confirmed the resistance of the isolated bacteria found on the leaflets to first and second line anti-TB drugs, which meant that the disease caused by them was much more difficult and expensive to treat.
"He went on to quote the conclusion of the Lugansk Republican Sanitary and Epidemiological station, which stated that “the infection of the banknotes was most likely artificial, since the material contains extremely dangerous strains of the pathogen in a concentration that can ensure infection and the development of the tuberculosis process.”
"Kirillov added that the LPR TB dispensary also noted signs of “deliberate, man-made contamination of leaflets with biomaterials of high pathogenicity.”
"Russian officials also claimed that the Pentagon had been allegedly conducting “inhumane” experiments on the patients of at least two psychiatric institutions in Kharkov. “The main category of experimental subjects was a group of male, highly physically exhausted patients aged between 40 to 60 years,” Kirillov said.
"The experiments were run directly by foreign specialists that had arrived in Ukraine through third-party nations to conceal the US’ involvement. The specialists were abruptly evacuated from the country earlier this year, shortly before the Russian military operation kicked off, Kirillov noted.
“In January 2022, the foreign citizens who conducted the experiments were urgently evacuated, and the equipment and drugs they used were taken to the western regions of Ukraine,” he said. "Last week, the head of Russia’s Investigative Committee, Alexander Bastrykin, told RT that the service had “clearly identified” multiple Americans involved in the military biological research in Ukraine, including Pentagon employees, as well as companies closely associated with the US military. According to Russian estimates, Washington poured more than $224 million into biological research in the country between 2005 and early 2022, Bastrykin stated.
"US officials have confirmed the existence of “biological research facilities” in Ukraine, but said Washington only provided what they called “assistance” for efforts that did not involve the development of bioweapons..."
pjmedia | According to financial records, Joe Biden has $5.2 million in
“unexplained income” that (by pure coincidence, of course) was acquired
around the same time Hunter Biden was raking in big bucks from foreign
business deals and earmarking “10 percent for the Big Guy.”
“The revelation ties the president even closer to Hunter’s overseas
business dealings – and makes his previous claims that he never
discussed them with his son, even less plausible,” the Daily Mailreports.
“Joe was able to pay the bills after earning millions of dollars
through his and his wife’s companies after he left office as vice
president.”
While some of the Bidens’ income came from book deals and speaking
engagements (imagine people paying to watch Biden speak!), there is a $7
million discrepancy between the income declared on his tax returns and
the income he declared on government transparency reports.
“Some of that difference can be accounted
for with salaries earned by First Lady Jill Biden and other sums not
required on his reports – but still leaves $5.2million earned by Joe’s
company and not listed on his transparency reports,” the Daily Mail‘s
investigation concludes. “The ‘missing millions’ – combined with emails
on Hunter’s abandoned laptop suggesting Joe would have a 10% share in
Hunter’s blockbuster deal with the Chinese – raise a troubling question:
did Joe Biden receive money from the foreign venture?”
Hm … a $5.2 million discrepancy? That’s not small potatoes. What
exactly was Biden trying to hide? Was it his cut of Hunter Biden’s shady
foreign business deals? There are a lot of unanswered questions here.
jonathanturley | Wikipedia editors are under fire this week for removing the entry for Rosemont Seneca Partners,
the investment company connected to Hunter Biden and his alleged
multimillion dollar influence peddling schemes. The site bizarrely
claimed that the company was “not notable.” The timing itself is notable
given the new disclosure
that Hunter Biden’s business partner, Eric Schwerin, made at least 19
visits to the White House and other official locations between 2009 and
2015. That included a meeting with then-Vice President Joe Biden despite
Biden’s repeated claim that he knew nothing about his son’s business dealings. Schwerin was the president of Rosemont Seneca.
Wikipedia has been accused of raw bias in removing the entry at a
time when interest in the company is at its peak, including the possibility of an indictment
of Hunter Biden over his financial dealings. Rosemont Seneca is one of
the most searched terms for those trying to understand the background
on the Biden business operations.
Yet, an editor “AlexEng” wrote that the company was simply “not
notable” — an absurd claim reminiscent of the recent claim by Atlantic
Magazine’s writer Anne Applebaum that she did not cover the scandal
because it simply was “not interesting.”
Alex wrote: “This organization is only mentioned in connection with
its famous founders, Hunter Biden and Christopher Heinz.” That itself is
an odd statement. It is mentioned as one of the key conduits of alleged
influence peddling money. Alex added that “keeping it around” ran the
risk of the page becoming “a magnet for conspiracy theories about Hunter
Biden.” It is that last comment that I found most concerning as part of
this decision.
Any Wikipedia page could be a magnet for conspiracy theories,
including the page on Hunter Biden himself. The fact is that this is a
real company with real dealings that are the subject of a real criminal
investigation. Indeed, various Republican members have already pledged
to conduct investigations into this and other companies if they secure
either house of Congress after the midterm elections.
So Wikipedia killed it just as a United States Attorney is drilling
down on financial dealings of Hunter Biden, including money received
from foreign sources through Rosemont Seneca.
jonathanturley | It appears that some media have a new narrative after admitting that the Hunter Biden laptop is legitimate after all.
According to Atlantic Magazine writer and Pulitzer Prize winner Anne
Applebaum, the story never did matter because it was just not
interesting and “totally irrelevant” to her. Strangely, however, it once
did. Applebaum pushed the false narrative as she was slamming others
for publishing “Russian disinformation” and using the Hunter Biden story
as an example. It only became uninteresting when it turned out to be
true. The one convincing assertion, however, is that it was simply not
viewed as “relevant.” What was clearly relevant for Twitter and most
media outlets was the election of Joe Biden. Otherwise, as captured by Gaston de La Touche, it is a matter of sheer boredom.
Applebaum was at my alma mater, The University of Chicago, for the Disinformation and the Erosion of Democracy conference
on Wednesday. The conference appeared largely an echo-chamber, a
disappointing lineup for UChicago which is known to value a diversity of
opinion. Applebaum slammed Fox and its viewers: “Those who live outside
the Fox News bubble and intend to remain there do not, of course, need
to learn any of this stuff.” (For the record, I work as a legal analyst
at Fox).
That is when University of Chicago Student Daniel Schmidt delivered a haymaker after citing her dig:
“A poll, later after that, found that if
voters knew about the content of the laptop, 16% of Joe Biden voters
would have acted differently. ‘Do you think the media acted
inappropriately when they instantly dismissed Hunter Biden’s laptop as
Russian disinformation, and what can we learn from that in ensuring that
what we label as disinformation is truly disinformation, and not
reality?”
Applebaum responded by saying that she really did not care if the laptop was legitimate because she did not find it interesting.
“My problem with Hunter Biden’s laptop is I
think it’s totally irrelevant,” she said. “I mean, it’s not whether
it’s disinformation… I didn’t think Hunter Biden’s business
relationships have anything to do with who should be President of the
United States.”
So, if the Biden family was engaged in selling
access to foreign interests, it really has nothing to do with the
President of the United States. It is not interesting that there are
references to Joe Biden’s knowledge or involvement and possible
benefitting from the millions passing through his son. It does not
matter that Hunter is shown telling his daughter
Naomi: “I hope you all can do what I did and pay for everything for
this entire family for 30 years. It’s really hard. But don’t worry,
unlike Pop [Joe], I won’t make you give me half your salary.”
tomluongo | All the roads to RussiaGate lead through Ukraine and British
Intelligence. At some point you just have to face the face of the
agitator. Every one of those stories have logical inconsistencies wide
enough to drive a column of tanks through.
These are painstakingly worked through by investigative journalists
pushed to the fringe by the technocrats’ willing partners in Silicon
Valley to minimize their influence over the narrative.
That, in itself, should be considered prima facia evidence of malfeasance but sadly it isn’t.
From the moment Russia’s troops crossed the border into Ukraine on
February 24th there has been a clear strategy by the Russian Ministries
of Defense and Foreign Affairs to head off potential false flags
publicly before they could be pulled off.
The Russian Foreign Ministry singled out the UK for its histrionics
saying if they wanted to lead the charge, they’ll get the worst
treatment.
With the pullout of Russian troops from around Kiev however, they
have little control over the preparing of the stage. You believe what
you want to believe about Bucha, I don’t care.
Given the track record of Russia’s accusers here I’m taking the
position that these allegations have to be incontrovertibly proven
publicly for me to believe a word of them. Here’s one version of the story (warning: very graphic).
That is how low the credibility of the sources on this are. The UK
government has been, along with Biden’s Dept. of State and National
Security Council, the most belligerent in their response to Russia’s
military operation. Their history and naked hatred of all things
Russian stretches back multiple centuries.
In short, they have motive, means and opportunity to stage a false
flag to push public sentiment further towards NATO’s intervention into
Ukraine officially, therefore a false flag is the most likely scenario.
Complaints about how Russia waged the initial part of this war have
centered on their unwillingness (but not opposition) to target
civilians. Kiev could have easily been taken if the Russians wanted to
commit massive atrocities against civilians.
They did not do so. That flies in the face of what’s being alleged
about Bucha. That doesn’t mean it didn’t happen the way it is being
alleged, but the burden of proof lies with the accuser (Ukraine) and
their allies (The US and UK).
And the main amplifier of this story, the UK, blocked not one but two
proposals by the Russian Federation to investigate what happened in
Bucha. We can’t have that, there’s a war to escalate.
Remember this story is only possible because the Russians first got
repulsed from taking Kiev and then pulled back from the areas
surrounding it. They are redeploying forces and regrouping for a major
push against Ukrainian forces trapped in the eastern part of Ukraine.
That operation will likely wipe out what’s left of the UAF troops
there and push the next phase of this war on the ground to its natural
state of equilibrium for the next few months.
There are so many people whose crimes in Ukraine would be exposed by a
Russian win there that it is truly existential to keep that from
happening. It goes deeper than even the ideology of the West which
needs to subjugate Russia if the Davos plan for global governance is going to have any hope of succeeding.
This is also personal for everyone from Joe Biden himself to
hundreds, if not thousands of people complicit in the various schemes,
plots and crimes committed in the petrie dish of corruption they’ve
staged their attacks on common decency from.
So, when I say they have motive, means and opportunity, I mean it.
These are the same people who impeached Donald Trump over a phone call.
Of course they will say the quiet parts out loud about what they want
to do to Putin for screwing up their grand plans.
This brings me back to my article from the other day
handicapping the Hungarian elections. Because Hungary is now in a very
strong position I posited they’d be in if Viktor Orban won the
election, which he did, emphatically. And that means the EU is in a
very precarious position to continue supporting an anti-Russia policy
stance.
Why We Started to Fear Extinction
-
*Why We Started to Fear Extinction | John McWhorter & Tyler Austin Harper |
The Glenn Show*
Everyone has a theory about how the world will end, but how ...
A Foundation of Joy
-
Two years and I've lost count of how many times my eye has been operated
on, either beating the fuck out of the tumor, or reattaching that slippery
eel ...
April Three
-
4/3
43
When 1 = A and 26 = Z
March = 43
What day?
4 to the power of 3 is 64
64th day is March 5
My birthday
March also has 5 letters.
4 x 3 = 12
...
Return of the Magi
-
Lately, the Holy Spirit is in the air. Emotional energy is swirling out of
the earth.I can feel it bubbling up, effervescing and evaporating around
us, s...
New Travels
-
Haven’t published on the Blog in quite a while. I at least part have been
immersed in the area of writing books. My focus is on Science Fiction an
Historic...
Covid-19 Preys Upon The Elderly And The Obese
-
sciencemag | This spring, after days of flulike symptoms and fever, a man
arrived at the emergency room at the University of Vermont Medical Center.
He ...