Sunday, June 21, 2015

confederate flag head-fake from the inconvenient truth of domestic terrorism....,


politicalusa |  FBI Director James Comey determined that the mass murder of nine black people in their place of worship, including a Democratic state Senator who was working to get police to use body cameras after the shooting of an unarmed Walter Scott, is not terrorism.
Comey explained his thinking that alleged shooter Dylann Roof is not a domestic terrorist because he had no political motive:
“Terrorism is act of violence done or threatens to in order to try to influence a public body or citizenry so it’s more of a political act and again based on what I know so more I don’t see it as a political act. Doesn’t make it any less horrific the label but terrorism has a definition under federal law,” he said during a visit to Baltimore.
The FBI is investigating the shooting as a hate crime, as is the Charleston police department. 

On Friday, Department of Justice spokeswoman Emily Pierce said the DOJ was investigating the massacre as both a hate crime and an act of terrorism, “The department is looking at this crime from all angles, including as a hate crime and as an act of domestic terrorism.”

Terrorism is “the use of violence to physically and psychologically terrorize a population by an individual or a group in order to draw attention to a cause, enact political change, or gain political power.” Dylann Roof claimed blacks were taking over. He clearly had a right wing agenda to “preserve traditional social orders,” which is a form of terrorism. “Right Wing terrorism is commonly characterized by militias and gangs; many times these groups are racially motivated and aim to marginalize minorities within a state.”

Racially motivated to marginalize minorities. 

So the FBI thinks this isn’t terrorism because somehow they don’t see the political agenda behind the alleged shooter’s motives to get rid of black people and start a race war, or his obsession with Trayvon Martin’s murder. 

That is sort of like saying the Civil Rights Movement didn’t have a political agenda. There is nothing more political than attacking southern blacks in their place of worship to intimidate them and make a political statement.

7 comments:

rohan said...

That Foundation site you linked a couple of days ago http://www.foundationwebsite.org/ (still reading that stuff today) is hardly warm and fuzzy - but its author is logically consistent and rational. This shit here is pure racial N-1 and the fact that Dawn doesn't recognize his beliefs for the N-1 that they are - says a lot about the multi-layered hypnotic nature of that mindphuk.


That expression Ken used the other day arguing with you "center their lives on a belief" should be rewritten, "center their lives within an engineered belief system" is on point. Looking around, you can see all these little memetic holding pens (belief systems) in which groups of humans are as thoroughly and hopelessly trapped as cattle at the stockyards.

CNu said...

knocked.it.straight.out.the.park! accept no substitutes...., suberb touch bouncing off that image of bowl-cut boy in holding pen too - thanks for paying attention brah!

CNu said...

That's nice. How many of them have called out the MSM confederate flag head fake du jour, and, called for the application of full-spectrum surveillance, deep social network analysis, and prompt military engagement with these objective enemies as military combatants within U.S. borders?

CNu said...

Predictably, that pasty pink cathadraxis-hustling excuse for a parish priest was conspicuously quiet about both the new encyclical, and, about the episode of domestic terrorism in Charlotte. Pathetic....,

Constructive_Feedback said...

DEAR SIR!!!

WHY do you limit your pursuit of WHITE SUPREMACY to the INTERIOR OF THE USA?

If I told you that there is a dramatic RISE in LEFT WING PRO-OBAMA GROUPS now calling for the TAKE DOWN OF THE CONFEDERATE FLAG, who are STILL SILENT AS THE "OBAMA-LEAD" US GOVERNMENT shows contempt for FLAGS OF SOVEREIGN NATIONS OF COLOR - you would say what?

CNu said...

I would say all-a-y'all are caught up and wasting sensible folks time and attention with frivolous and quixotic concerns. FOCUS on the application of existing law to appropriate subjects of that law. Everything else is frivolous distraction.

CNu said...

I think this type of thinking is unavoidable with those who talk in terms of IQ ratings

Not really. Those that understand what IQ measures were intended to achieve wouldn't think this way at all, much less act in the manner of this IQ-75 L00Z3R. http://subrealism.blogspot.com/search?q=alfred+binet However, those who center their lives on a scientifically invalid belief, no matter how hypnotically attractive to them - are pretty much bound to do this or else silently skulk in a state of ceaseless and paradoxical antagonism.

and the true Christians one by one came forward showing concern for his soul, asking for him to repent and asking God to have mercy for him.


if by "true christians" you mean powerless and pathetic lambs subject to senseless slaughter, it's amazing what the human mind will accept and concoct in order to rationalize weakness, impotence, and subjugation...,

Master Arbitrageur Nancy Pelosi Is At It Again....,

🇺🇸TUCKER: HOW DID NANCY PELOSI GET SO RICH? Tucker: "I have no clue at all how Nancy Pelosi is just so rich or how her stock picks ar...