TUCKER CARLSON: “How can world governments kill more than 10 million people and leave some large undetermined number disabled for life? And not say a word about it. Not apologize. Not work to fix it. Not work to make the families whole. I mean, just leave it by the side of the… pic.twitter.com/zVy7ZY3rPB
TUCKER CARLSON: “How can world governments kill more than 10 million people and leave some large undetermined number disabled for life? And not say a word about it. Not apologize. Not work to fix it. Not work to make the families whole. I mean, just leave it by the side of the road like a corpse and keep marching. I don’t understand that. How can that happen?
STEVE KIRSCH: “Believe me, I’m surprised, as well. You know, I can’t get an audience with anybody in the United States Congress. Except for Senator Ron Johnson. Like, I can’t have a dialogue. They won’t talk to me. Nobody wants to know. They don’t want to know the truth. It’s like autism in this country. You know, autism has been around for a very long time. And we’ve known from the statistics that vaccines cause autism. It’s the leading cause of autism. Now, can we even get a discussion about that?”
TUCKER CARLSON: “May I? May I ask you to pause that? I mean, the statement you just made is verboten. I mean, no person who wanted to say work at the Atlantic magazine or who takes the New York Times on a daily basis would ever say something like that because you’re not allowed to say that. Tell us why you say that?”
STEVE KIRSCH: “Because it’s true. I’ve collected my own data just independently, to look at, at the connection between vaccines and autism. And it’s amazing. I had over 10,000 parents, tell me about their kids. And I said, hey, tell me about your kids. Tell me how many vaccines they got, and tell me if they have autism. Tell me if they have ADHD. You know, just tell me about your kids. Tell me about the medical conditions. And tell me about how many shots they get. And it’s a straight line. The more shots you get, the more likely you are to get autism. And it’s the same thing for ADHD. It’s the same thing for PANDAS. It’s the same thing for autoimmune diseases. I mean that it is basically the more shots you get, the less healthy the kids are.”
off-guardian | There is one thing that’s new about this latest propaganda drive since January, 2020. Whereas the others all united what
we (very loosely) call “the left” (along with certain sectors of the
GOP) against the “far-right” bogey, this one has abruptly split that gross alliance, as both parties—Trump et al. included—and the
“liberal media” have (predictably) swung virulently Zionist, while the
“woke” masses (predictably, and, often, virulently) “stand with
Palestine,” along with some few politicians, movie stars and rappers.
This livid falling-out has only weakened the antagonists, since both
sides are disabled by a common blindness to what’s really happening to them both (and all the rest of us).
“We are the people of light, they are the people of darkness—and light shall triumph over darkness.”
Thus spake Netanyahu two days ago, spelling out the Manichaean vision
that “our free press” has, by and large, been variously pitching since
October 7, and that has Zionists beside themselves with open genocidal
rage, not just at Hamas, and/or its armed confederates, but at the Gazans overall, and, no doubt, all Palestinians.
It was, of course, the “sudden” horror of Hamas’s attack, and the
endless invocation of the Holocaust by the Israeli government (and,
therefore, by “our free press”), that now has Zionists not only cheering as the IDF kills thousands more than
Hamas killed (and forcibly “relocates” many thousands more), but
attacking anyone who isn’t cheering, too, demanding that whoever doesn’t
“stand with Israel” be censored, fired, expelled from school or
otherwise eliminated in a crackdown that makes “cancel culture” seem (almost) benign.
This ferocious drive against the Palestinians, and anyone who
advocates on their behalf, is wholly based on the Official Story that
“our free press” (as usual) will not question, even though the
Israeli people don’t believe it, since there is overwhelming evidence
against it—evidence that “our free press” will not report, just as it
has long blacked out the agony in Gaza (and those eight years of Nazi
violence in East Ukraine).
And as the Zionists have been disastrously misled by the Official
Story, so have those who applauded Hamas’s bloody raids, voicing
“exhilaration” over what they took to be a righteous counter-blow against the occupying power, like the heroic uprising in the Warsaw ghetto. While Gaza does recall the Warsaw ghetto, Hamas’s “surprise attack” does not recall that uprising, which actually did come as a surprise (and, of course, killed no civilians), whereas “October 7” clearly was an “inside job,” as the Israeli people know—an inconvenient fact for all who now want to see still more people
die, whether Israelis, Gazans, Jews, Palestinians, Muslims or whomever
else they hate, for whatever reason (or no reason).
So let us finally pose the crucial question: Who benefits from the catastrophe that may now sweep us all away, if we don’t break the spell of the Official Story? It’s surely not the
Zionists, since Netanyahu obviously isn’t one, or he wouldn’t have
forced “vaccination” on his people, through what may well have been the
toughest “vaccine” mandate in the world. Despite his reputation, and his
demagogic rhetoric, Netanyahu would appear to be a globalist, not a Zionist.
Certainly this latest melodrama is now speedily intensifying the
repressive trends that started with the rollout of “the virus,” from
ever-tighter censorship, to still “smarter” surveillance, to the
splintering of opposition, to the exacerbation of the refugee crisis,
and so on, as this acute OffGuardian piece makes clear:
Now, let’s return to the only bit of good news in this whole hyper-barbaric episode—that the Israeli people get it,
not just about Hamas’s “surprise attack,” but about the “vaccination”
drive that Netanyahu forced on them, and which now has them “dying
suddenly” week after week, along with other peoples the world over.
Could it be that Netanyahu actually is not the ultimate or only author of “October 7,” and that its purpose wasn’t just to save his hide politically?
Is it not possible that, just as “his” drive to “vaccinate” all the
Israeli people was probably dictated from on high, he organized “October
7,” or okayed it, on the orders of the same powers who’ve been ravaging
the world since January, 2020?
Not only is this crisis serving perfectly to foster still more chaos,
division and economic ruination overall, but, more precisely, it has
(at least for now) completely drowned out the Israelis’ quiet, shared
awareness that “vaccination” is a stroke of democide, imposed worldwide not with the noble goal of “saving lives,” but—on the contrary—to end as many lives as possible, for the purpose of extreme depopulation everywhere (as
Bill Gates once incautiously revealed, when he referred to the eventual
concluding phase of global “vaccination” as “the final solution”).
The last thing that our masters want is for the Israelis’ consciousness of what’s been done to them to spread to other countries, so that enough of us wake up, and unify enough to put an end to these catastrophes at last.
And so those whose eyes are now so full of blood that they just want to see more people die—whether Jews or Palestinians—had better understand, for their own sake, that those behind the “vaccination” drive agree with you, and with your enemy, since they want nearly all of us to die, and the sooner the better.
So if you can’t stop hating any others to the point of
wanting them all dead, go ahead and keep it up. It’s your funeral
(assuming anyone will be around to bury you).
lewrockwell | In early April 2023, microbiologist Kevin McKernan — a former researcher and team leader for the MIT Human Genome project1 — posted a preprint paper2 detailing massive DNA contamination in Pfizer’s and Moderna’s bivalent COVID booster shots.3,4,5,6 As explained in the abstract:7
“Several methods were deployed to
assess the nucleic acid composition of four expired vials of the Moderna
and Pfizer bivalent mRNA vaccines. Two vials from each vendor were
evaluated …
Multiple assays support DNA
contamination that exceeds the European Medicines Agency (EMA) 330ng/mg
requirement and the FDAs 10ng/dose requirements …”
The highest level of DNA contamination found was 30%, meaning nearly
one-third of the content of certain vials was plasmid DNA, the presence
of which dramatically increases the likelihood of genomic integration
and cancer.
What this means, in plain English, is that the shots could
potentially alter your DNA, which is something vaccine makers, health
authorities and fact checkers have vehemently denied and written off as
“impossible.” Yet here we are, with inconvenient facts staring us in the
face yet again.
Regulatory Agencies Were Aware of the Problem
In a May 20, 2023, Substack article,8 McKernan
pointed out that regulatory agencies were clearly aware of this problem
early on, as Pfizer submitted documents to the European Medicines
Agency (EMA) showing sampled lots had a broad range of double-stranded
DNA (dsDNA) in them.
The EMA’s limit for dsDNA is 330 nanograms per milligram (ng/mg), and
Pfizer’s data show sampled lots had anywhere from 1 ng/mg to 815 ng/mg
of DNA. And, according to McKernan,9 the
EMA’s limit may be too high to begin with, as “lower limits should be
applied if the DNA is packaged in transfection ready lipid
nanoparticles,” as they are in the shots.
In a sane regulatory environment, this kind of contamination would
have resulted in a massive recall, considering the known and suspected
dangers of dsDNA contaminants. Yet nothing was done about it.
Since McKernan’s paper was posted, others have confirmed the presence
of dsDNA contaminants in the COVID shots. To be clear, DNA should not
be present in a commercial product that has been made under good
manufacturing practices.
Obviously, Pfizer and Moderna have not perfected their commercial
process, or have taken shortcuts they shouldn’t have. As a result,
countless millions have been injected with unnecessarily risky COVID
shots.
University of South Carolina professor Phillip Buckhaults has since
confirmed the presence of dsDNA in the COVID shots. September 13, 2023,
he testified10 to
this before the South Carolina Senate Medical Affairs Ad-Hoc Committee
on the Department of Health and Environmental Control (DHEC).
Buckhaults is a molecular biologist and cancer geneticist with
extensive experience in DNA sequencing, and initially set out to debunk
McKernan’s claims. To his shock, he replicated McKernan’s findings
instead.
In his testimony, he explained how these DNA contaminants can
integrate into your genome and disrupt the function of other genes,
either long term or permanently, and may be passed on to offspring for
generations.
He told the senators he was “alarmed about this DNA being in the
vaccine,” as “there is a very real hazard” of the dsDNA integrating into
a person’s genome and becoming a “permanent fixture of the cell” that
can result in autoimmune problems and cancers.11
Buckhaults suspects high levels of DNA contaminants may also be
causing some of the more serious side effects of the jabs, such as
lethal cardiac arrest.12 Of
the two lots he analyzed, he found between 5 nanograms and 20 ng of
plasmid DNA — ranging from one to 200 base pairs long — per 300
microliter dose, and he points out that having a multitude of tiny
fragments is far riskier than having one big piece of DNA.13
The risk of genome integration by dsDNA has been known for decades,14 so
the individuals who decided to allow this contamination to remain
cannot claim they didn’t know public health would be put at risk.
vigilantnews | Soon, mRNA technology will be coming to flu vaccines.
Supporters tout that the adaptability of mRNA technology allows for
quicker response times in developing vaccines that can more accurately
target circulating influenza strains, potentially making yearly flu
shots more effective.
Furthermore, work is being done to apply
mRNA technology to “treat” various other diseases. It is being explored
as a potential treatment for sickle-cell disease and the autoimmune disorder, multiple sclerosis. Additionally, its application in cancer treatment is under investigation, with the aim of harnessing the immune system to combat malignancies.
The fight against HIV, a long-standing global health challenge, is also on mRNA’s radar. Currently, three experimental HIV vaccines, built on an mRNA design akin to the COVID-19 vaccines, are in the early stages of human clinical trials.
The award to Karikó and Weissman is not without controversy.
Dr. Robert Malone, a renowned scientist, medical doctor, and pioneer in mRNA vaccine technology, made some fiery comments on “X.”
He stated, “Kariko and Weissman get the Nobel, not for inventing mRNA vaccines (because I did that) but for adding the pseudouridine that allowed unlimited spike toxins to be manufactured in what could have been a safe and effective vaccine platform, if safely developed.”
Malone
further criticized the integrity of the award process, suggesting undue
influence from pharmaceutical giants. “Pfizer has been campaigning for
this since 2020 - at first, they even claimed (as did Kariko) that she
invented the mRNA vaccine platform technology. Pfizer donates heavily to the Karolinska Institute, which awards the Nobel. Science has been hijacked again by big pharma.”
The
decision to honor Karikó and Weissman while omitting key contributors
like Dr. Robert Malone raises questions about the narrative that’s being
pushed surrounding mRNA technology. One thing is sure: COVID is just
the beginning. And what will likely ensue will be subsequent campaigns
to get more mRNA injected into every man, woman, and child.
NYTimes | Garbage, feces
and needles run through the rivers in Missoula, Mont. On the streets of
San Francisco, tents are so thick that sidewalks in the Tenderloin
neighborhood have become “unofficial open-air public housing.” In
Portland, Ore., a blaze shut down an on-ramp to the Steel Bridge for
several days in March after campers tunneled through a cinder block wall
and lit a campfire to stay warm.
In a
surge of legal briefs this week, frustrated leaders from across the
political spectrum, including the liberal governor of California and
right-wing state legislators in Arizona, charged that homeless
encampments were turning their public spaces into pits of squalor,and
asked the Supreme Court to revisit lower court decisions that they say
have hobbled their ability to bring these camps under control.
The
urgent pleas come as leaders across the country, and particularly in
the West, have sought to rebound from the coronavirus pandemic and
restore normalcy in cities. In more than two dozen briefs filed in an
appeal of a decision on homeless policies in a southern Oregon town,
officials from nearly every Western state and beyond described desolate
scenes related to a proliferation of tent encampments in recent years.
They
begged the justices to let them remove people from their streets
without running afoul of court rulings that have protected the civil
rights of homeless individuals.
“The friction in many communities
affected by homelessness is at a breaking point,” the attorneys for Las
Vegas, Seattle and more than a dozen other cities, as well as national
municipal organizations, wrote in one brief. “Despite massive infusions
of public resources, businesses and residents are suffering the
increasingly negative effects of long-term urban camping.”
Homeless
rights advocates agreed that tent encampments were unsafe both for
their vulnerable occupants and the communities around them. But they
said the gathering legal campaign was merely an attempt to fall back on
timeworn government crackdowns rather than pursue the obvious solutions:
more help and more housing.
“They’re
seeking to blame and penalize and marginalize the victims rather than
take the steps they haven’t found the political will to take,” said Eric
Tars, the senior policy director at the National Homelessness Law
Center.
Homelessness has increasingly overwhelmed
state and local governments across the country. In California alone,
more than 170,000 people are homeless, accounting for about one-third of the nation’s homeless population.
More than 115,000 of those homeless Californians sleep on the streets,
in cars or outdoors in places not intended for habitation, according to a
federal tally of homelessness conducted last year.
Five
years ago, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ruled in
case from Boise, Idaho, that it was unconstitutional for cities to clear
homeless camps and criminally charge campers unless they could offer
adequate housing. In the nine Western states covered by the circuit,
that ruling has since prompted billions of dollars of public spending on
homelessness.
tomsdispatch | Today, more than 38 million
people officially live below the federal poverty line and, in truth,
that figure should have shocked the nation into action before the
coronavirus even arrived here. No such luck and here’s the real story
anyway: the official measure
of poverty, developed in 1964, doesn’t even take into account household
expenses like health care, child care, housing, and transportation, not
to speak of other costs that have burgeoned in recent decades. The
world has undergone profound economic transformations over the last 66
years and yet this out-of-date measure, based on three times a family’s
food budget, continues to shape policymaking at every level of
government as well as the contours of the American political and moral
imagination.
Two years ago, the Poor People’s Campaign (which I co-chair alongside
Reverend William Barber II) and the Institute for Policy Studies
released an audit of America.
Its centerpiece was a far more realistic assessment of poverty and
economic precariousness in this country. Using the Census Bureau’s
Supplemental Poverty Measure as a baseline, which, among other things,
measures family income after taxes and out-of-pocket expenses for food,
clothing, housing, and utilities, there are at least 140 million people who are poor — or just a $400 emergency from that state. (Of that, there are now untold examples in this pandemic moment.)
As poverty has grown and spread, one of the great political weapons
of politicians and the ruling elite over the past decades (only
emphasized in the age of Trump) has been to minimize, dismiss, and
racialize it. In the 1970s, President Richard Nixon’s “Southern Strategy”
coded it into Republican national politics; in the 1980s, in the years
of Ronald Reagan’s presidency, the fabricated image of “the welfare queen”
gained symbolic prominence. In the 1990s, President Bill Clinton’s
welfare “reforms” enshrined such thinking in the arguments of both
parties. Today, given the outright racism and xenophobia that has become
the hallmark of Donald Trump’s presidency, “poor” has become a curse
word.
It is, of course, true that, among the 140 million poor people in the
U.S., a disproportionate number are indeed people of color. The
inheritance of slavery, Jim Crow, never-ending discrimination, and the mass incarceration
of black men in particular, as well as a generational disinvestment in
such populations, could have resulted in nothing less. And yet the
reality of poverty stretches deep into every community in this country. According to
that audit of America, the poor or low-income today consist of 24
million blacks, 38 million Latinos, eight million Asian-Americans, two
million Native peoples, and 66 million whites.
Those staggering numbers, already a deadweight for the nation, are
likely to prove a grotestque underestimate in the coronaviral world we
now inhabit and yet none of this should be a surprise. Although we
couldn’t have predicted the exact circumstances of this pandemic, social
theorists remind us that conditions were ripe for just this kind of economic dislocation.
Over the past 50 years, for instance, rents have risen faster than income in every city. Before the coronavirus outbreak, there was not a single county
in this country where a person making a minimum wage with a family
could afford a two-bedroom apartment. No surprise then that, throughout
this crisis, there has been a rise in rent strikes, housing takeovers,
and calls for moratoriums on evictions. The quiet fact is that, in the
last few decades, unemployment, underemployment, poverty, and
homelessness have become ever more deeply and permanently structured
into this society.
dailymail | US officials are quietly shutting down a
taxpayer-funded $125million project to hunt for new viruses due to fears
it could spark another pandemic.
DEEP
VZN - pronounced deep vision - was launched in October 2021 with the
aim of finding and studying novel pathogens in wildlife in Asia, Africa and Latin America.
While
the research was meant to prevent human outbreaks and pandemics,
critics, including Biden administration officials, are afraid it could
do the opposite and have voiced their fears about the potentially
'catastrophic risks' of virus hunting.
The project was meant to run until 2026, but DEEP VZN was shut down without a formal public announcement in July 2023.
USAID's DEEP VZN (pronounced deep vision) project was hunting viruses among wildlife in Asia , Africa and Latin America.
While this is the most recent to come to light, it is far from the first research the US has conducted on this matter.
For more than a decade the government has funded international projects aimed
at identifying exotic viruses among wildlife that could infect humans
someday, sending millions to support various similar projects.
Money
has flown overseas from the Department of Defense and the National
Institutes of Health to the tune of hundreds of millions of dollars.
DEEP
VZN, which stands for Discovery & Exploration of Emerging Pathogens
- Viral Zoonoses, was launched by the United States Agency for
International Development (USAID) in October 2021 and less than two
years later, USAID officials informed members of Senate committees with jurisdiction over DEEP VZN the program was being shut down.
The
premature closure of the project came abruptly and was privately
relayed to Senate aides by the office of Atul Gawande, USAID's assistant
administrator for global health.
The news was buried in a congressional budget
document hundreds of pages long and was discussed during interviews Mr
William conducted with federal lawmakers and researchers.
A
scientist at the center of the Covid lab leak theory has admitted he
cannot rule out the possibility the virus escaped a Chinese research
facility.
At
its launch, USAID said the 'ambitious new project' was meant to work
with partner countries and the global community to 'build better
preparedness for future global health threats.'
The
organization said the project would 'strengthen global capacity to
detect and understand the risks of viral spillover from wildlife to
humans that could cause another pandemic.
'The
COVID-19 pandemic has demonstrated how infectious diseases threaten all
of society, up-ending people's lives and attacking societies at their
cores.
'It is also a strong reminder
of the connection between animals, humans, and the environment, and the
effect that an emerging pathogen spilling over into humans can have on
people's health and on global economies.'
The project was being carried out by scientists from the Washington State University Paul Allen School for Global Health among other research and partner entities.
The
goal was to collect more than 800,000 samples over the five-year
period, mostly from wildlife, to identify a subset of 'previously
unknown' viruses that 'pose a significant pandemic threat.'
The
university sought to detect 12,000 new viruses throughout the program's
run and scientists hoped the information would not only help prevent
future pandemics, but also better prepare health officials if one did
emerge.
'DEEP VZN is a critical next
step in the evolution of USAID's work to understand and address the
risks posed by zoonotic diseases that can be transmitted from animals to
humans.'
However, in a statement
regarding the closure of the program, USAID said it had determined the
research was 'not an agency global health security priority at this
time' and its decision reflected 'the relative risks and impact of our
programming.'
On Thursday, the Russian Ministry of Defense (MoD) released new files procured by Russian forces in eastern Ukraine, which include communications between American financier Hunter Biden – the son of US President Joe Biden – and figures engaged in biological research in Ukraine that his investment company aided in financing.
The emails disclosed the identities of numerous key American leaders
from Metabiota and Black & Veatch, and also officials from the US
Defense Threat Reduction Agency (DTRA), who were involved in biological
research initiatives. Those named include:
commondreams | An under-the-radar report by U.S. President Joe Biden's National
Infrastructure Advisory Council should not go unnoticed, said the
national watchdog Food & Water Watch
on Thursday, as buried in the document is a call for the privatization
of U.S. water systems, which progressive lawmakers and civil society
groups have long opposed.
On page 15 of the 38-page report, the advisory council said
the federal government should "remove barriers to privatization,
concessions, and other nontraditional models of funding community water
systems in conjunction with each state's development of best practice."
Food
& Water Watch (FWW) suggested that the recommendation goes hand in
hand with the panel chairmanship of Adebayo Ogunlesi, who is the
chairman and CEO of Global Infrastructure Partners (GIP).
GIP is
"an infrastructure investment bank with an estimated $100 billion in
assets under management that targets energy, transportation, digital,
and water infrastructure," said FWW, making the takeover of public water
and wastewater utilities by a private corporation—often under the guise
of improving aging systems and lowering costs—financially beneficial
for the bank.
"Instead of relying on Wall Street advisers, President Biden should support policies that will truly help communities."
Mary Grant, Public Water for All campaign director at FWW, called the recommendation "a terrible idea."
"President
Biden should have never appointed an investment banker to chair an
advisory council for the nation's infrastructure," said Grant. "Wall
Street wants to take control of the nation's public water systems to
wring profits from communities that are already struggling with
unaffordable water bills and toxic water."
FWW has analyzed
water privatization schemes for years, finding that they it often leave
communities "with higher water bills, worse service, job losses, and
little control to fix these problems."
A 2018 report by the group titledAmerica's Secret Water Crisisfound
that out of 11 privatized water utilities across the U.S., all but one
refused to provide data about shutoffs for nonpayment. The group's 2011
brief Water = Lifeshowed
that low-income households are disproportionately affected by water
price hikes by private owners, as privatization turns a resource
recognized by the United Nations as an "essential human right" into a
commodity.
"Privatization would deepen the nation's water crises,
leading to higher water bills and less accountable and transparent
services," said Grant. "Privately owned water systems charge 59% more
than local government systems, and private ownership is the single largest factor associated with higher water bills—more than aging infrastructure or drought."
Grant noted that the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law
passed in 2021 was "a step forward" as it invested $55 billion to
expand water infrastructure, but pointed out that "it provided only
about 7% of the identified needs of our water systems."
"Instead
of relying on Wall Street advisers, President Biden should support
policies that will truly help communities by asking Congress to pass the
Water Affordability, Transparency, Equity, and Reliability (WATER) Act
(H.R. 1729, S. 938)," she added.
amgreatness | The head of Russia’s Nuclear, Biological and Chemical (NBC)
Protection forces released a statement this week suggesting that
nefarious officials in the United States developed and deployed COVID-19
for “offensive purposes” and may be plotting a new pandemic.
The United States government officially claims that its scientists
study pathogens in biolabs around the world to develop preventative
measures to potential viruses, but Moscow does not buy that.
Lieutenant General Igor Kirillov said that the United States may have
played a role in inflicting the COVID-19 pathogen on the world and may
be working to create another biological crisis.
“We do not rule out the United States may use so-called defensive
technologies for offensive purposes, as well as for global governance by
creating crisis situations of biological nature,” Kirillov warned.
According to the Russian State media outlet RT,
Moscow believes there was collusion between Big Pharma and USAID
through the EcoHealth Alliance, a U.S.-based non-government organization
run by Peter Daszak, to develop new strains of coronavirus.
“The intermediary organization EcoHealth Alliance has played a key
role in implementing projects to study this pathogen. Since 2015, the
organization’s researchers have been involved in studying a diverse
population of bats, searching for new coronavirus strains and mechanisms
for animal-to-human transmission. Over 2,500 bats have been studied,”
Kirillov stated.
The general brought up the troubling fact that the World Health
Organization, Gates Foundation, and Johns Hopkins University conducted
the Event 201
drills in New York on October 18, 2019, just two months before the
first COVID-19 cases were officially reported in China. The ostensive
purpose of the exercise was to practice the steps that would be taken
during a coronavirus outbreak, but many people believe it was a
“practice run” for the pandemic.
“The fact that the pandemic unfolded exactly according to this
scenario, as well as the implementation of EcoHealth Alliance’s
projects, gives rise to questions as to whether COVID-19 was in fact an
intentionally man-made disease and whether the US may have had a hand in
this incident,” Kirillov said.
Kirillov also expressed deep concern that the Biden regime’s new
Office of Pandemic Preparedness and Response Policy is up to no good.
“The United States’ next step, aimed at pushing ahead with its
strategic plans for establishing global control over the biological
situation, was the creation of the Office of Pandemic Preparedness and
Response Policy. This new agency is expected to be responsible for
charting a course and coordinating actions to combat known and unknown
biological challenges, including pathogens that might trigger another
global emergency,” Kirillov said.
tomrenz | This article is pretty science heavy so at this point I also want to
acknowledge two additional points. First, I am not a Peter
McCullough/Harvey Risch type scientist. I am a lawyer with some science
background. That means that I am not the guy that will be creating
science, but to do my job as an attorney litigating in this area I have
to be able to read and understand the science. I do those things quite
well. Second, the information in this article is based simply on reading
and understanding the science. There is nothing here I’ve created - I
just know how to read.
Disclaimers aside, I want to open this
article with a confession. This article was titled using the acronym
mRNA but that was intentionally misleading. For purposes of this article
- mRNA actually stands for modRNA which is different from mRNA. mRNA is
messenger RNA and is found all over in life. modRNA is laboratory
modified RNA that has been synthetically created for a purpose. It can
be more durable, and have substantially greater impact than a true mRNA
and can do many other things.
Why does this matter? Well let’s start with the COVID “vaccines”.
Because mRNA is a weak particle and breaks down easily with a relatively
lower risk of messing with your genetics than other gene therapy
products (like modRNA) that is what is always talked about in the jabs.
The problem is that it is a lie. Here is the FDA label for the Pfizer
jab:
You can find the entire label here: https://labeling.pfizer.com/ShowLabeling.aspx?id=14471.
Note that different vials are different (denoted by the cap color) but
also, under number 3, that one of the ingredients is modRNA. No one is
talking about this but it is crucial.
Life as we know it is specified by the genomes of the myriad organisms with which we share the planet. Every organism possesses a genome that contains the biological information
needed to construct and maintain a living example of that organism.
Most genomes, including the human genome and those of all other cellular
life forms, are made of DNA (deoxyribonucleic acid) but a few viruses have RNA (ribonucleic acid) genomes. DNA and RNA are polymeric molecules made up of chains of monomeric subunits called nucleotides.
To give you an idea of how complicated the genes that make up our body are this description from the same webpage follows:
The human genome, which is typical of the genomes of all multicellular animals, consists of two distinct parts (Figure 1.1):
*The nuclear genome comprises approximately 3 200 000 000 nucleotides of DNA, divided into 24 linear molecules, the shortest 50 000 000 nucleotides in length and the longest 260 000 000
nucleotides, each contained in a different chromosome. These 24
chromosomes consist of 22 autosomes and the two sex chromosomes, X and Y.
*The mitochondrial genome is a circular DNA molecule of 16 569 nucleotides, multiple copies of which are located in the energy-generating organelles called mitochondria.
*Each of the approximately 1013
cells in the adult human body has its own copy or copies of the genome,
the only exceptions being those few cell types, such as red blood
cells, that lack a nucleus in their fully differentiated state. The vast
majority of cells are diploid
and so have two copies of each autosome, plus two sex chromosomes, XX
for females or XY for males - 46 chromosomes in all. These are called somatic cells, in contrast to sex cells or gametes, which are haploid
and have just 23 chromosomes, comprising one of each autosome and one
sex chromosome. Both types of cell have about 8000 copies of the
mitochondrial genome, 10 or so in each mitochondrion.
So
think about how complex that makes us. The nuclear genome contains 3.2
billion nucleotides & the mitochondrial genome contains 16.5k. Each
of these were designed by God and have evolved over the millennia to
work as a singular machine. Now imagine a watch. The watch tells perfect
time because a bunch of tiny gears all work perfectly together to move
the hands the appropriate amount to point to the proper minutes and
seconds. If one of these gears becomes damaged or the wrong size gear is
put into place the entire watch would go haywire and fail to work. A
watch may have hundreds of parts - our bodies have billions.
With
that in mind let’s talk about modRNA (or worse - saRNA). Rather than
taking my word for what this is let me share this explanation from
Pfizer you can find at https://www.pfizer.com/science/innovation/mrna-technology until they change it (which will likely happen shortly after I publish this):
So Pfizer’s modRNA and saRNA vaccines modify the nucleosides that make up the genes that make up our body.
Hawaii is unique. The islands and what was the Kingdom of Hawaii have been victims of colonialism. The Hawaiian people’s fear of a land grab is real, and based on historic actions of both Britain and the United States. The 1993 Appology Resolution from US Congress on this was a small step in the right direction. There is still a strong sovereignty movement in Hawaii who seek sovereignty from the US. This issue ties in with that. No different than the history of Continental North America, and even presently, Indiginous peoples are always faced with others trying to take their land for monetary gain. Hawaiians are not recognized as “Native Americans”, but the historic facts would support that the Hawaiian people do hold Indiginous title/Aboriginal title/Native title to the islands.
It is kind of like banning Indian names for football teams while taking away their land and keeping them on a reservation. The government will probably ban the word "aloha" and use of leis while taking away their land. Uncle Ben and Aunt Jamaima scenario, we cannot have anything that reminds us how the Democrats oppressed people outside of their hate groups. Be ready for any reminder of Maui being take off the shelves.
I am not surprised that liberals do not realize that negating cultural appropriation is the epitome or embodiment of racism. Telling people to stay in their own lane, or race that is, is what people in the klan used to always say. Dumbing down people in public schools was entirely effective.
npr | Hawaii's governor vowed "to keep the land in local people's hands"
when Maui rebuilds from a deadly wildfire that incinerated a historic
island community, as local schools began reopening.
Gov. Josh
Green said Wednesday that he had instructed the state attorney general
to work toward a moratorium on land transactions in Lahaina. He
acknowledged the move will likely face legal challenges.
"My
intention from start to finish is to make sure that no one is victimized
from a land grab," Green said at a news conference. "People are right
now traumatized. Please do not approach them with an offer to buy their
land. Do not approach their families saying they'll be much better off
if they make a deal. Because we're not going to allow it."
Also Wednesday, the number of dead reached 111, and Maui police said
nine victims had been identified, and the families of five had been
notified. A mobile morgue unit with additional coroners arrived Tuesday
to help process and identify remains.
The cause of the
wildfires, the deadliest in the U.S. in more than a century, is under
investigation. Hawaii is increasingly at risk from disasters, with
wildfire rising fastest, according to an Associated Press analysis of
FEMA records.
Since flames consumed much of Lahaina about a
week ago, locals have feared that a rebuilt town could be even more
oriented toward wealthy visitors, Lahaina native Richy Palalay said
Saturday at a shelter for evacuees.
Hotels and condos "that we can't afford to live in — that's what we're afraid of," he said.
Many
in Lahaina were struggling to afford life in Hawaii before the fire.
Statewide, a typical starter home costs over $1 million, while the
average renter pays 42% of their income for housing, according to a
Forbes Housing analysis, the highest ratio in the country by a wide
margin.
wave3 | This story began December 1 at 5 p.m. with a phone call to our newsroom from a horrified University Hospital employee. The employee claimed security had just wheeled an elderly woman all the way out to the corner of Hancock and Ali, just off hospital property, dumped the woman out of the wheelchair on the sidewalk and left.
Minutes later, we shot video of her still in a soiled hospital gown and slippers, breathing hard under a blanket placed over her in 36 degree weather. Her stuff was in a bag next to her.
The caller claimed she saw this a lot.
So I started watching, and on December 16 at 7 p.m., 35 degrees outside, I recorded three security guards surrounding an elderly woman with a walker and slowly escorting her out of the emergency room.
She couldn’t move fast.
It took several minutes to make it all the way to the same corner of Hancock and Ali.
After they had her across the street off the hospital property, the security guards turned around and went back.
When they cleared I caught up to her. She said she couldn’t breathe.
“They told me I would not stay on the premises,” she said.
“Were you there as a patient?” I asked.
“I needed to be a patient because I’m sick,” she said.
“What’s wrong with you?” I asked.
“I’ve got COPD,” she said. “I got diabetes.”
“So they wouldn’t treat you?” I asked.
“The doctor talked to me for one minute,” she said.
“And told you what?” I said.
“That I had to leave,” she said.
“What reason did he give you?” I asked.
“He didn’t give me a reason,” she said.
She told me she was homeless.
“I’ve got to go because I’m hurting,” she said. “I’m in pain.”
Matthew Hauber and his mother claimed a similar story. They met us in front of Wayside Christian Mission in the spot where they said he was dumped in October.
“I was in a car crash,” Matthew said. “I completely shattered my hip and pelvis. I got like 30-some screws.”
“They said we can’t find a rehab right now,” Linda Hauber said.
She said when Norton Hospital told her they had a room lined up for Matthew at Wayside, she checked it out.
“I called Wayside just to confirm, and they said ‘No, we can’t do that, we can’t.’” Linda said. “‘We have beds and help find jobs, but we don’t take medically needy people, we don’t do that.’”
She said she then had a conference call with the hospital staff.
“The social worker said ‘We’re going to take him to a shelter’ and I said ‘Which one?’” Linda said. “And they said Wayside Christian Mission. And I said ‘Well I know that’s not true, because I called them and they don’t take them.’ Then the social worker said ‘That’s history, we’ll think of something else.’” Ad
Linda said the next day, her son was unloaded from a transport vehicle on the curb in the rain on Jackson Street in front of Wayside.
“I thought ‘They’ve dumped my son...’ my garbage I have to put out to the curb, that’s how they dumped my son,” Linda said. “Like garbage.”
Linda said she was in no shape to care for him at home. She died after the interview with us.
“They put all their stuff on the sidewalk over there, dump them off on the sidewalk, get back in their vehicle and get out of here just as fast as they can,” Wayside staffer Perry Layne said. Ad
merylnass | Here is another wonderfully researched and written look into the long
morbid history of how the powerful repeatedly sterilize the powerless.
Hard to believe, but California was still sterilizing women in prisons
until about 20 years ago, that we know of. The Midwestern Doctor has
produced another tour de force.
“Billionaires Try to Shrink World’s Population”: Secret Gathering Sponsored by Bill Gates, 2009 Meeting of “The Good Club”
Is Worldwide Depopulation Part of the Billionaire's "Great Reset"
For more than ten years, meetings have been held by billionaires described as philanthropists to Reduce the Size of the World’s Population culminating with the 2020-2022 Covid crisis.
Recent
developments suggest that “Depopulation” is an integral part of the
so-called Covid mandates including the lockdown policies and the mRNA
“vaccine”.
Flash back to 2009. According to the Wall Street Journal: “Billionaires Try to Shrink World’s Population”.
In
May 2009, the Billionaire philanthropists met behind closed doors at
the home of the president of The Rockefeller University in Manhattan.
This Secret Gathering was sponsored by Bill Gates. They called themselves “The Good Club”.
Among the participants were the late David Rockefeller, Warren Buffett, George Soros, Michael Bloomberg Ted Turner, Oprah Winfrey and many more.
In May 2009, the WSJ as well as the Sunday Times reported: (John Harlow, Los Angeles) that
“Some
of America’s leading billionaires have met secretly to consider how
their wealth could be used to slow the growth of the world’s population
and speed up improvements in health and education.”
The emphasis was not on population growth (i.e Planned Parenthood) but on “Depopulation”, i.e,. the reduction in the absolute size of the World’s population.
amidwesterndoctor |Reducing global population has been a consistent goal of the ruling class for centuries. While many support the abstract idea of population control, no one wants to volunteer to be the ones who are culled. The business of population control has hence been a very messy subject.
When
the COVID vaccine program began, I—and likely many others—suspected the
COVID vaccines would have an “unexpected” side effect of reducing
fertility. Early in their development, Mike Yeadon (and others) at
great personal risk publicly warned regulators of a clear fertility
danger inherent to the vaccine (found in section IX of their petition).
Subsequent
regulatory document leaks from the European FDA revealed Pfizer
exempted themselves from testing the key areas of concern (infertility,
autoimmunity and cancer) in animals. This highly unusual moved further
suggested serious problems existed in these three areas (as you can’t
find something if you don’t officially test for it).
Despite
repeated denials, signs of each of these key complications from the
vaccine have now emerged. While I do not have every piece of the
puzzle—there are likely many “population control initiatives” I’ve never
heard of—I know enough to paint a clear picture of this dirty
business.
The first half of this two-part article
will lay out the historical precedent of using any means necessary to
reduce the population, while the second part will examine how this has
been attempted with vaccinations.
Cruel Philosophies
As
best as I can tell, there are three overlapping schools of thought that
have created the zealous belief in a need for population control.
1. Many governments, especially those in the East, have adopted the
viewpoint that periodic wars are necessary for the stability of the
society. This viewpoint primarily arises from social instability caused
by too many young adult males in the state coupled with the issues that
occur when there is insufficient food available to the population. In
turn, many wars have been fought specifically for this reason. (I am
most familiar with this being a common theme in China, as they have
observed over the centuries the one thing that will cause rebellions are
famines.)
Following World War 2, the Western ruling elite came to
a consensus that the war approach was no longer tenable due to the
extreme collateral infrastructure and environmental damage modern
weaponry (ie. nukes) created. I only know of two exceptions to this
rule:
Wars in third-world nations lacking advaced weaponry
where the collateral damage those wars caused was inconsequential to
first-world nations.
Talks that occurred within the Chinese
military leadership, but have so far not materialized, over starting a
war with India so both countries could mutually alleviate their
challenging population burden. For context, China has attempted
population control with their “one-child” policy, but it has been met
with mixed success and widespread social resistance.
The
alternative to war is a multi-pronged attack that seeks every possible
avenue to reduce fertility and accelerate aging, which many argue is the
more humane option of the two. One of the curious facts I have
observed over the decades is how frequently an odd policy or
environmental agent always seems to converge on the common pathway of
reducing population. Once or twice, you can write it up as a
coincidence, but at a certain point, you have to wonder if it is all
intentional.
When I studied the early history of infectious diseases (discussed in my previous articles
on smallpox), one of the most striking things to me was the absolute
squalor the serfs were forced into as the feudal lords kicked them off
the land to live in the early cities. It was much worse than most
people of this modern era can even conceive of.
When I
first learned of this, I guessed the suffering that move caused for the
lower class must have been viewed as a necessary trade off by the
European rulership to facilitate the Industrial Revolution, something
vital for national development. After I learned about the Malthusian
philosophy, I realized those abhorrent living situations was likely the
goal in of itself.
In 1798, Rev. Thomas R Malthus published the influential work An Essay on the Principle of Population,which
argued that human populations tend to increase at a geometrical
(exponential) rate, but the means of subsistence (food) grows at only an
arithmetic (linear) rate. "The power of population is indefinitely greater than the power of the earth to produce subsistence for man,"
according to Malthus, who therefore believed the standard of living of
the masses could not be improved without the checks of war, famine, or
disease. In their absence, population would increase by a geometric rate
and lead to a catastrophic “Malthusian” food supply collapse.
While
there are numerous errors in his theory, Malthus was appointed to
multiple important positions, and his ideas appear to have gradually
become a prevailing conviction among members of the ruling classes in
the 19th century. These ideas also influenced other key figures, such as
Charles Darwin while he created his theory of evolution and natural
selection.
Numerous groups were founded over the
decades, which emphasized birth control and increasing mortality of the
poor. These groups included Dr. George Drysdale's Elements of Social
Science in 1854, the Malthusian League in
1877, and Margret Sanger’s National Birth Control League in 1915, which
became the Planned Parenthood Federation of America in 1942. Initially
these groups were domestic, but gradually they became global, at which
point, they tied international aid and development to population control
measures.
The Malthusian and Darwinian ideals gradually
gave birth to Social Darwinism and Eugenics, which were both widely
adopted by the ruling elite. Social Darwinism argued that class
divisions were the will of nature and that this form of natural
selection, rather than being evil, was necessary. The most extreme
version of this ideology, eugenics, appears to have arisen from two key
factors:
1. The tribal nature of human beings and the tendency
to view all other tribes as inferior (the ruling class felt this way
towards the poor).
2. The advances of society were
making it possible for many of the weaker members of society, who
previously would have died off, to survive long enough to reproduce and,
over time, significantly weaken the gene pool.
Eugenics
in turn advocated preventing those who were less “fit” from breeding.
This has been responsible for horror upon horror since its inception,
and it provided the theoretical foundation for why, among other things,
the Nazis forcibly sterilized the mentally-ill. When the Nazis
eventually were tried at Nuremberg for their crimes against humanity,
few know that that many cited the fact similar actions were first
conducted by the “Great United States” as part of their defense.
To which values should an A.I. be aligned?
-
Nathan Gardels, The Babelian Tower Of AI Alignment, *Noema*, April 26,
2024:
As generative AI models become ever more powerful on their way to
surpassi...
A Foundation of Joy
-
Two years and I've lost count of how many times my eye has been operated
on, either beating the fuck out of the tumor, or reattaching that slippery
eel ...
April Three
-
4/3
43
When 1 = A and 26 = Z
March = 43
What day?
4 to the power of 3 is 64
64th day is March 5
My birthday
March also has 5 letters.
4 x 3 = 12
...
Return of the Magi
-
Lately, the Holy Spirit is in the air. Emotional energy is swirling out of
the earth.I can feel it bubbling up, effervescing and evaporating around
us, s...
New Travels
-
Haven’t published on the Blog in quite a while. I at least part have been
immersed in the area of writing books. My focus is on Science Fiction an
Historic...
Covid-19 Preys Upon The Elderly And The Obese
-
sciencemag | This spring, after days of flulike symptoms and fever, a man
arrived at the emergency room at the University of Vermont Medical Center.
He ...