theatlantic | Here's something else Obama said in that interview last year: "I
have not yet heard ... a persuasive vision of how Israel survives as a
democracy and a Jewish state at peace with its neighbors in the absence
of a peace deal with the Palestinians and a two-state solution. Nobody
has presented me a credible scenario."
He went on, "The only thing that I’ve heard is,
'We’ll just keep on doing what we’re doing, and deal with problems as
they arise. And we'll build settlements where we can. And where there
are problems in the West Bank, we will deal with them forcefully. We’ll
cooperate or co-opt the Palestinian Authority.' And yet, at no point do
you ever see an actual resolution to the problem. ... And my assessment,
which is shared by a number of Israeli observers, I think, is there
comes a point where you can’t manage this anymore, and then you start
having to make very difficult choices."
Over the past couple of days I've had several conversations with
American Jewish leaders—those who are located in the broad middle,
between the J Street/Sheldon Adelson ends of the spectrum—and they are
uniformly, and deeply, anxious. The message was the same: Netanyahu's
next, even-more-right-wing-than-usual government, they fear, will only
take steps to further Israel's isolation, from America and from the
world, and the Obama administration, which feels such deep, emotional
anger toward Israel, will only make the situation worse, by
misunderstanding, and downplaying, Israel's anxieties. (Sad but true:
Some Israelis voted for Netanyahu because they're frightened of
Obama.)
