Friday, October 10, 2014
last night my son shifted his focus from chemical and petroleum engineering to physical chemistry and nuclear engineering...,
centauri-dreams | Whenever we’re audacious enough to categorize far future
civilizations, we turn to the work of Nikolai Kardashev. Nick Nielsen
today looks at the well known Kardashev scale in the light of a curious
fact: While many use Kardashev’s rankings in their own speculations, few
have gone back and dug into his original paper. In Kardashev’s terms,
our planet is close to attaining Type I status, which would surprise
many commentators. And doesn’t the ambiguity over what constitutes the
energy of a star — red dwarf? red giant? — play havoc with cut and dried
‘type’ definitions? How subsequent writers have adapted and modified
the Kardashev scale makes for a cautionary tale about mastering our
sources before using them for further extrapolation. For that matter,
are there better gauges of a civilization than its use of particular
energy resources? Answering the question deepens the debate that
Kardashev so fruitfully began.
By
CNu
at
October 10, 2014
16 Comments
Labels: Possibilities
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Our private research universities are not actually purely private...,
X | Our private research universities are not actually purely private. They are designed to be both a cryptic soft extension of the sta...

-
theatlantic | The Ku Klux Klan, Ronald Reagan, and, for most of its history, the NRA all worked to control guns. The Founding Fathers...
-
dailybeast | Of all the problems in America today, none is both as obvious and as overlooked as the colossal human catastrophe that is our...
-
Farmer Scrub | We've just completed one full year of weighing and recording everything we harvest from the yard. I've uploaded a s...