medicalxpress | What prompts ordinary people to commit acts of evil? The question has
been debated by philosophers, moralists, historians and scientists for
centuries.
One idea that carries much weight today is this:
you, me—almost anyone—is capable of carrying out atrocities if ordered
to do so.
Commanded by an authoritarian figure, and wishing to conform, we
could bulldoze homes, burn books, separate parents from children or even
slaughter them, and our much-prized conscience would not as much as
flicker.
Called the "banality of evil," the theory has been proffered as an
explanation for why ordinary, educated Germans took part in the Jewish
genocide of World War II.
Now psychologists, having reviewed an opinion-shaping experiment carried out more than 50 years ago, are calling for a rethink.
"The more we read and the more data we collect, the less evidence we
find to support the banality of evil idea, the notion that participants
are simply 'thoughtless' or 'mindless' zombies who don't know what
they're doing and just go along for the sake of it," said Alex Haslam, a
professor at the University of Queensland in Australia.
"Our sense is that some form of identification, and hence choice, generally underpins all tyrannical behaviour."
Their detective work focused on legendary experiments conducted in 1961 by Yale University psychologist Stanley Milgram.
Volunteers, told they were taking part in an experiment on learning,
were led to believe they were administering an electric shock to a man,
dubbed the "learner" who had to memorise pairs of words.
Evil of Eichmann
Every time the learner made a mistake, the "teacher" was told by a
stern-faced, lab-coated official to crank up the shock, starting with a
mild 15 volts and climaxing at a lethal 450 volts.
The experiment was fake—the learner was an actor and the shocks never
happened. The teacher could hear, but not see, the learner.
Frighteningly, in one test, nearly two-thirds of volunteers continued
all the way to "lethal" voltage, even when the learner pleaded for
mercy, wept or screamed in agony.
These experiments became enshrined in textbooks as an illustration of how the conscience can be put on hold under orders.
The findings meshed with a landmark book by the writer Hannah Arendt
on the 1961 trial of Adolf Eichmann, an architect of the Holocaust.
Far from the monster she had expected, Arendt found that Eichmann
came across more like a petty bureaucrat, prompting her to coin the term
"banality of evil" to suggest how ordinary people, by conforming, could
commit atrocities.
