atrazinelovers | Atrazine is an herbicide (weed-killer) primarily used on corn. Atrazine
is the most common chemical contaminant of ground and surface water in
the United States. It is a potent endocrine disruptor with ill effects
in wildlife, laboratory animals and humans. Atrazine chemically
castrates and feminizes wildlife and reduces immune function in both
wildlife and laboratory rodents. Atrazine induces breast and prostate
cancer, retards mammary development, and induces abortion in laboratory
rodents. Studies in human populations and cell and tissue studies
suggest that atrazine poses similar threats to humans. The
peer-reviewed scientific studies to support these statements are
summarized and can be viewed as you navigate this website.
Atrazine has been denied regulatory approval by the European Union and
is, thus, banned, in Europe, even in Switzerland, the home of the
manufacturer. Despite the environmental and public health risks,
atrazine continues to be used in the US, for economic reasons. Atrazine
may only increase corn yield by as little as 1.2 % (and not at all
according to some studies. The agri-giant Syngenta, however, has a very
powerful lobby and spent $250,000 lobbying in Minnesota alone in 2005
to keep atrazine on the market there.
With as little as 1.2 % increase in corn, a crop that we consume less
than 2% of, in a world where 20% of the population will die of
starvation, it is incumbent upon us to become involved in the
regulatory process regarding atrazine. We (the public) must play an
active role in this regulatory decision.
NewYorker | In 2010, Hayes told the EcoRisk panel in an e-mail, “I have just
initiated what will be the most extraordinary academic event in this
battle!” He had another paper coming out in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,
which described how male tadpoles exposed to atrazine grew up to be
functional females with impaired fertility. He advised the company that
it would want to get its P.R. campaign up to speed. “It’s nice to know
that in this economy I can keep so many people employed,” he wrote. He
quoted both Tupac Shakur and the South African king Shaka Zulu: “Never
leave an enemy behind or it will rise again to fly at your throat.”
Syngenta’s head of global product safety wrote a letter to the editor of the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
and to the president of the National Academy of Sciences, expressing
concern that a “publication with so many obvious weaknesses could
achieve publication in such a reputable scientific journal.” A month
later, Syngenta filed an ethics complaint with the chancellor of
Berkeley, claiming that Hayes’s e-mails violated the university’s
Standards of Ethical Conduct, particularly Respect for Others. Syngenta
posted more than eighty of Hayes’s e-mails on its Web site and enclosed a
few in its letter to the chancellor. In one, with the subject line “Are
y’all ready for it,” Hayes wrote, “Ya fulla my j*z right now!” In
another, he told the Syngenta scientists that he’d had a drink after a
conference with their “republican buddies,” who wanted to know about a
figure he had used in his paper. “As long as you followin me around, I
know I’m da sh*t,” he wrote. “By the way, yo boy left his pre-written
questions at the table!”
Berkeley declined to
take disciplinary action against Hayes. The university’s lawyer reminded
Syngenta in a letter that “all parties have an equal responsibility to
act professionally.” David Wake said that he read many of the e-mails
and found them “quite hilarious.” “He’s treating them like street punks,
and they view themselves as captains of industry,” he said. “When he
gets tapped, he goes right back at them.”
Michelle
Boone, a professor of aquatic ecology at Miami University, who served
on the E.P.A.’s scientific advisory panel, said, “We all follow the
Tyrone Hayes drama, and some people will say, ‘He should just do the
science.’ But the science doesn’t speak for itself. Industry has
unlimited resources and bully power. Tyrone is the only one calling them
out on what they’re doing.” However, she added, “I do think some people
feel he has lost his objectivity.”
Keith
Solomon, a professor emeritus at the University of Guelph, Ontario, who
has received funding from Syngenta and served on the EcoRisk panel,
noted that academics who refuse industry money are not immune from
biases; they’re under pressure to produce papers, in order to get tenure
and promotions. “If I do an experiment, look at the data every which
way, and find nothing, it will not be easy to publish,” he said.
“Journals want excitement. They want bad things to happen.”
Hayes,
who had gained more than fifty pounds since becoming tenured, wore
bright scarves draped over his suit and silver earrings from Tibet. At
the end of his lectures, he broke into rhyme: “I see a
ruse / intentionally constructed to confuse the news / well, I’ve taken
it upon myself to defuse the clues / so that you can choose / and to
demonstrate the objectivity of the methods I use.” At some of his
lectures, Hayes warned that the consequences of atrazine use were
disproportionately felt by people of color. “If you’re black or
Hispanic, you’re more likely to live or work in areas where you’re
exposed to crap,” he said. He explained that “on the one side I’m trying
to play by the ivory-tower rules, and on the other side people are
playing by a different set of rules.” Syngenta was speaking directly to
the public, whereas scientists were publishing their research in
“magazines that you can’t buy in Barnes and Noble.” Fist tap Rohan.
BusinessInsider | A group of Chinese scientists just reported that they modified the
genome of human embryos, something that has never been done in the
history of the world, according to a report in Nature News.
A recent biotech discovery — one that has been called the
biggest biotech discovery of the century — showed how scientists might
be able to modify a human genome when that genome was still just in an
embryo.
This could change not only the genetic material of a person, but
could also change the DNA they pass on, removing "bad" genetic codes
(and potentially adding "good" ones) and taking an active hand in
evolution.
Concerned scientists published an argument that no one should edit the human genome in this way until we better understood the consequences after a report uncovered rumors that Chinese scientists were already working on using this technology.
But this new paper, published April 18 in the journal Protein and Cell by a Chinese group led by gene-function researcher Junjiu Huang of Sun Yat-sen University, shows
that work has already been done, and Nature News spoke to a Chinese
source that said at least four different groups are "pursuing gene editing in human embryos."
telegraph | A protein which ‘turbo-charges’ the immune
system so that it can fight off any cancer or virus has been discovered
by scientists.
In a breakthrough
described as a ‘game-changer’ for cancer treatment, researchers at
Imperial College found a previously unknown molecule which boosts the
body’s ability to fight off chronic illnesses.
Scientists at Imperial College London, who led the study, are now
developing a gene therapy based on the protein and hope to begin human
trials in three years.
“This is
exciting because we have found a completely different way to use the
immune system to fight cancer,” said Professor Philip Ashton-Rickardt,
from the Section of Immunobiology in the Department of Medicine at
Imperial, who led the study.
“It could be a game-changer for treating a number of different cancers and viruses.
“This is a completely unknown protein. Nobody had ever seen it before
or was even aware that it existed. It looks and acts like no other
protein.”
The protein – named lymphocyte expansion molecule, or
LEM, promotes the spread of cancer killing ‘T cells’ by generating large
amounts of energy.
Normally when the immune system detects
cancer it goes into overdrive trying to fight the disease, flooding the
body with T cells. But it quickly runs out of steam.
bmj.com |Objectives
Dysbiosis of the intestinal microbiota is associated with Crohn's
disease (CD). Functional evidence for a causal role of
bacteria in the development of
chronic small intestinal inflammation is lacking. Similar to human
pathology, TNFdeltaARE mice develop a tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-driven CD-like transmural inflammation with predominant ileal involvement.
Design Heterozygous TNFdeltaARE
mice and wildtype (WT) littermates were housed under conventional
(CONV), specific pathogen-free (SPF) and germ-free (GF)
conditions. Microbial communities
were analysed by high-throughput 16S ribosomal RNA gene sequencing.
Metaproteomes were measured
using LC-MS. Temporal and spatial
resolution of disease development was followed after antibiotic
treatment and transfer of
microbial communities into GF mice.
Granulocyte infiltration and Paneth cell function was assessed by
immunofluorescence and
gene expression analysis.
Results GF-TNFdeltaARE mice were free of inflammation in the gut and antibiotic treatment of CONV-TNFdeltaARE mice attenuated ileitis but not colitis, demonstrating that disease severity and location are microbiota-dependent. SPF-TNFdeltaARE
mice developed distinct ileitis-phenotypes associated with gradual loss
of antimicrobial defence. 16S analysis and metaproteomics
revealed specific compositional and
functional alterations of bacterial communities in inflamed mice.
Transplantation of disease-associated
but not healthy microbiota
transmitted CD-like ileitis to GF-TNFdeltaARE recipients and triggered loss of lysozyme and cryptdin-2 expression. Monoassociation of GF-TNFdeltaARE mice with the human CD-related Escherichia coli LF82 did not induce ileitis.
Conclusions We provide clear experimental evidence for the causal role of gut bacterial dysbiosis in the development of chronic ileal
inflammation with subsequent failure of Paneth cell function.
phys.org |A fertilized human egg may seem like the ultimate blank
slate. But within days of fertilization, the growing mass of cells
activates not only human genes but also viral DNA lingering in the human
genome from ancient infections.
Now researchers at the Stanford University School of Medicine have found that the early human cells produce viral proteins,
and even become crowded with what appear to be assembled viral
particles. These viral proteins could manipulate some of the earliest
steps in human development, affecting gene expression and even possibly protecting the cells from further viral infection.
The finding raises questions as to who, or what, is really pulling the strings during human embryogenesis.
"It's both fascinating and a little creepy," said Joanna Wysocka,
PhD, associate professor of developmental biology and of chemical and
systems biology. "We've discovered that a specific class of viruses that
invaded the human genome during recent evolution becomes reactivated in
the early development of the human embryo, leading to the presence of
viral-like particles and proteins in the human cells."
A paper describing the findings was published online April 20 in Nature. Wysocka is the senior author, and graduate student Edward Grow is the lead author.
Viral particles in the embryo
Retroviruses are a class of virus that insert their DNA into the
genome of the host cell for later reactivation. In this stealth mode,
the virus bides its time, taking advantage of cellular DNA replication
to spread to each of an infected cell's progeny every time the cell
divides. HIV is one well-known example of a retrovirus that infects
humans.
When a retrovirus infects a germ cell, which makes sperm and eggs, or
infects a very early-stage embryo before the germ cells have arisen,
the viral DNA is passed along to future generations. Over evolutionary
time, however, these viral genomes often become mutated and inactivated.
About 8 percent of the human genome is made up of viral sequences
left behind during past infections. One retrovirus, HERVK, however,
infected humans repeatedly until relatively recently—within about
200,000 years. Much of HERVK's genome is still snuggled, intact, in each
of our cells.
Most of these sequences are inactive in mature cells, but recent
research has shown that they can spring to life in tumor cells or in
human embryonic stem cells. A study published in February in Cell Stem Cell
by researchers from Singapore's Genome Institute showed that sequences
from a primate virus called HERVH are also activated in early human
development.
Now the Stanford researchers have shown for the first time that viral
proteins are abundantly present in the developing human embryo and
assemble into what appear to be viral particles in electron microscopy
images. By following up with additional studies in human embryonic cells
grown in vitro, scientists showed that these viral proteins affect gene
expression in the developing embryo and may protect the cells from
infection by other viruses.
lrc | For sixty years I have been captivated by the heroic stories of Robin Hood. The Adventures of Robin Hood was my favorite movie as a kid, Errol Flynn my favorite actor. Adventures of Robin Hood, by Eleanor Graham Vance, was my favorite book as a kindergartener. I still have it in my library.
Over the past several days I have once again been reliving my corrupted youth by watching on DVD the 143 episodes of The Adventures of Robin Hood starring Richard Greene. Above is Outlaw Money, one of my favorites with many themes LRC enthusiasts will relish.
The television series was produced in England by Sapphire Films. Sapphire Films was founded by producer Hannah Weinstein allegedly with funds provided by the Hollywood branch of the Communist Party USA. The ingenious Weinstein hired many blacklisted Hollywood writers
to write scripts for The Adventures of Robin Hood. She and her
conspiratorial cohorts devised a sophisticated covert procedure to keep
their identities secret and protected. All this elaborate ruse would
seem to vindicate Ayn Rand’s crusading war against these Hollywood Reds
and the destructive Robin Hood myth fostered in the series they created.
The novelist/philosopher was perhaps the fiercest enemy of these
Hollywood Communists and of Robin Hood. She famously testified as a “friendly witness”
before the House Committee on Un-American Activities concerning
Communist infiltration and propaganda in Hollywood. In one of the most
memorable passages of her novel Atlas Shruggedshe has one of her major characters, Ragnar Danneskjold, condemn Robin Hood in the harshest and most vindictive manner.
But Rand got it wrong. In the TV series which aired contemporaneously
to the publication of her novel, Robin and his band are not the
proto-Marxist proletarian plunderers of the productive rich and
despoilers of private property but are actually defenders of justice in
property titles, the rule of law, and the non-aggression principle.
Virtually every episode is replete with imaginative tales of rebellious
Saxon peasants battling against Norman tyranny and taxation by the
Sheriff of Nottingham and his minions acting as the corrupt arms of the
State.
I recommend all Randroids not paralyzed from the neck up “objectively” read Robin Hood: People’s Outlaw and Forest Hero: A Graphic Guide,
by the scholar and masterful left-wing propagandist Paul Buhle. It is a
delightful, unrepentant, and informative exploration of the Robin Hood
legend and why the tales of his exploits have remained popular for
centuries.
(speaking of: red shirt commodores → The Commodores → Lionel Richie → Hello → Facebook)
betanews | It's easily forgotten with the number of apps available, but mobile phones are primarily designed for making calls on the move -- whodda thunk it? When you receive a call you'll usually see the number of the caller, but this may not be helpful in identifying them before you decide whether to pick up. Facebook's answer to this problem is Hello.
This new app comes from the Facebook Messenger team and aims to tell you more about the person getting in touch with you even if you don’t have their number saved in your address book. Currently available for Android, the dialer app also allows for the blocking of calls from individuals.
The app integrates with Facebook, so you can use it to search for people and businesses. To allay privacy fears, Facebookpoints outthat Hello only has access to information which has been made publicly available on the social network -- perhaps serving as a timely reminder to check yourprivacy settings(...)
DoDlive.mil | DARPA released its Breakthrough Technologies for National Security,
a biennial report summarizing the Agency’s historical mission, current
and evolving focus areas and recent transitions of DARPA-developed
technologies to the military Services and other sectors, last month. The
report’s release coincided with testimony by DARPA Director Arati
Prabhakar before the Emerging Threats and Capabilities Subcommittee of
the House Armed Services Committee, at a hearing entitled “Department of
Defense Fiscal Year 2016 Science and Technology Programs: Laying the
Groundwork to Maintain Technological Superiority.” The full report is
available for download online.
Breakthrough Technologies for National Security affirms that America is in a strong strategic position today, in large
part because of its longstanding technological dominance. But it also
notes that a number of challenges threaten that status, including the
global spread of ever more powerful and less expensive technologies and
the emergence of disruptive non-nation-state actors in addition to
ongoing threats from peer adversaries.
“DARPA’s mission and philosophy have held steady for
decades, but the world around DARPA has changed dramatically,” the
report says. “Those changes include some remarkable and even astonishing
scientific and technological advances that, if wisely and purposefully
harnessed, have the potential not only to ensure ongoing U.S. military
superiority and security but also to catalyze societal and economic
advances. At the same time, the world is experiencing some deeply
disturbing technical, economic and geopolitical shifts that pose
potential threats to U.S. preeminence and stability.”
Those dueling trends of simmering menace and unprecedented
opportunity deeply inform DARPA’s most recent determination of its
strategic priorities for the next several years, the report says.
The report identifies the phenomenon of increasing pace as a central
challenge and opportunity—from the need for ever-faster radio-frequency
and information-processing systems that work on the scale of
nanoseconds, to the need to speed up the development time of major
military systems, whose timescales today extend to decades.
“In these areas and others,” the report says, “DARPA will pursue the
strategic imperative of pace in part by continuing to be a bold,
risk-tolerant investor in high-impact technologies, so the Nation can be
the first to develop and adopt the novel capabilities made possible by
such work.”
DARPA is focusing its strategic investments in four main areas:
Rethink Complex Military Systems:
To help enable faster development and integration of breakthrough
military capabilities in today’s rapidly shifting landscape, DARPA is
working to make weapons systems more modular and easily upgraded and
improved; assure superiority in the air, maritime, ground, space and
cyber domains; improve position, navigation and timing (PNT) without
depending on the satellite-based Global Positioning System; and augment
defenses against terrorism.
Master the Information Explosion:
DARPA is developing novel approaches to deriving insights from massive
datasets, with powerful big-data tools. The Agency is also developing
technologies to ensure that the data and systems with which critical
decisions are made are trustworthy, such as automated cyber defense
capabilities and methods to create fundamentally more secure systems.
And DARPA is addressing the growing need to ensure privacy at various
levels of need without losing the national security value that comes
from appropriate access to networked data.
Harness Biology as Technology:
To leverage recent breakthroughs in neuroscience, immunology, genetics
and related fields, DARPA in 2014 created its Biological Technologies
Office, which has enabled a new level of momentum for the Agency’s
portfolio of innovative, bio-based programs. DARPA’s work in this area
includes programs to accelerate progress in synthetic biology, outpace
the spread of infectious diseases and master new neurotechnologies.
Expand the Technological Frontier:
DARPA’s core work has always involved overcoming seemingly
insurmountable physics and engineering barriers and, once showing those
daunting problems to be tractable after all, applying new capabilities
made possible by these breakthroughs directly to national security
needs. Maintaining momentum in this essential specialty, DARPA is
working to achieve new capabilities by applying deep mathematics;
inventing new chemistries, processes and materials; and harnessing
quantum physics.
Breakthrough Technologies for National Security
includes two sections highlighting examples of DARPA technologies that
have transitioned to the military or other organizations in support of
national interests. One section focuses on technology transitions from
recent programs to the Services. A second section, entitled “Success
Stories,” looks at the long-term impacts of certain DARPA programs over a
period of decades—a reminder that the benefits of DARPA research often
extend for many years after initial applications get operationalized,
sometimes in unexpected ways.
A theme common to all these examples is that many individuals and
organizations—public and private—have been involved in each success.
That reflects the importance not only of DARPA’s seminal investments but
also of the Nation’s vibrant technology ecosystem, which builds on the
Agency’s work and applies DARPA’s advances to the task of ensuring
national security.
“DARPA focuses heavily on building collaborative communities of
expertise in institutions across the country,” the report notes. “This
approach helps the Nation by encouraging work at the boundaries and
intersections of disciplines, while making the Agency itself an
enormously supportive, interactive and satisfying place to work.”
thinkprogress | The House will vote Tuesday to repeal consumer protections for
low-income borrowers in rural America who have seen the promise of
affordable housing turned into a financial sinkhole by a mobile home
industry that makes pre-manufactured houses far more expensive to buy
than they need to be.
The bill is part of the GOP majority’s campaign to chisel away at
specific pieces of the Dodd-Frank financial regulatory overhaul that
became law in 2010 but which left many details to be filled in later by
regulators. In this case, it was the Consumer Financial Protection
Bureau (CFPB) that did that filling. After long study
of both publicly-available data and proprietary information from the
industry itself, the CFPB began enforcing new consumer protections for
people who borrow money for a manufactured home.
When Rep. Stephen Fincher’s bill to roll back those regulations
passes on Tuesday, the rules will have been in force for barely 15
months.
The mobile home financing market is an esoteric landscape for a
battle between consumer advocates, regulators, and politicians. Compared
to the American Dream trappings that come with traditional
homeownership, families in mobile homes don’t have much cultural cache.
“Lots of people deride these homes for their quality, which is unfair
these days, or deride the people who live in them as white trash, which
is horrifying,” said Doug Ryan, director of the Corporation for
Enterprise Development’s Affordable Homeownership Initiatives. That
stigma makes it easy to sell Fincher’s deregulatory package for mobile
home financing, Ryan said. The public and many lawmakers “say, ‘Who
cares how they get financed? They’re bad stuff anyway, and if that’s all
you can afford you probably deserve this.’”
Just 6 percent of Americans who live in a house live in one of these
pre-fab ones, but they are a vital low-cost housing option in rural
communities, where they make up 14 percent of occupied housing. The
all-in cost of living for the average manufactured home dweller is a
full third below the average for traditional “site-built” homes. There
are twelve states where the units make up over a tenth of the market,
mostly in the South and West. In South Carolina, 17 percent of all
occupied housing is manufactured.
The manufactured home population is whiter, poorer, less educated,
and older than the traditional homeowner. The median income of a pre-fab
household is just half that of the median family in a site-built house.
Many mobile home families are still paying a larger share of their
income for housing despite the significant savings in raw dollar terms.
That’s a perverse outcome for what should, on paper, be one of the most
affordable ways to put a dignified roof overhead. And it’s being driven
by the extremely high price that the industry charges for credit.
Fincher’s bill will strip important borrower protections
for thousands of families living in pre-fab homes, including
prohibitions on predatory loan features and legal recourse for borrowers
who get behind on very expensive loans.
Guardian | There are many things about Palestine that are not easily seen from a
distance. The beauty of the land, for instance, is not at all obvious.
Scripture and travellers’ reports describe a harsh terrain of stone and
rocks, a place in which it is difficult to find water or to shelter from
the sun. Why would anyone want this land? But then you visit and you
understand the attenuated intensity of what you see. You get the sense
that there are no wasted gestures, that this is an economical landscape,
and that there is great beauty in this economy. The sky is full of
clouds that are like flecks of white paint. The olive trees, the leaves
of which have silvered undersides, are like an apparition. And even the
stones and rocks speak of history, of deep time, and of the consolation
that comes with all old places. This is a land of tombs, mountains and
mysterious valleys. All this one can only really see at close range.
Another thing one sees, obscured by distance but vivid up close, is
that the Israeli oppression of Palestinian people is not necessarily –
or at least not always – as crude as western media can make it seem. It
is in fact extremely refined, and involves a dizzying assemblage of laws
and bylaws, contracts, ancient documents, force, amendments, customs,
religion, conventions and sudden irrational moves, all mixed together
and imposed with the greatest care.
The impression this insistence on legality confers, from the Israeli
side, is of an infinitely patient due process that will eventually
pacify the enemy and guarantee security. The reality, from the
Palestinian side, is of a suffocating viciousness. The fate of
Palestinian Arabs since the nakba has been to be scattered and
oppressed by different means: in the West Bank, in Gaza, inside the 1948
borders, in Jerusalem, in refugee camps abroad, in Jordan, in the
distant diaspora. In all these places, Palestinians experience
restrictions on their freedom and on their movement. To be Palestinian
is to be hemmed in. Much of this is done by brute military force from
the Israeli Defence Forces – killing for which no later accounting is
possible – or on an individual basis in the secret chambers of the Shin
Bet. But a lot of it is done according to Israeli law, argued in and
approved by Israeli courts, and technically legal, even when the laws in
question are bad laws and in clear contravention of international
standards and conventions.
The reality is that, as a Palestinian Arab, in order to defend yourself
against the persecution you face, not only do you have to be an expert
in Israeli law, you also have to be a Jewish Israeli and have the force
of the Israeli state as your guarantor. You have to be what you are not,
what it is not possible for you to be, in order not to be slowly
strangled by the laws arrayed against you. In Israel,
there is no pretence that the opposing parties in these cases are equal
before the law; or, rather, such a pretence exists, but no one on
either side takes it seriously. This has certainly been the reality for
the Palestinian families living in Sheikh Jarrah whose homes, built
mostly in 1956, inhabited by three or four generations of people, are
being taken from them by legal means.
NYTimes | In New York, almost 120,000 black men
between the ages of 25 and 54 are missing from everyday life. In
Chicago, 45,000 are, and more than 30,000 are missing in Philadelphia.
Across the South — from North Charleston, S.C., through Georgia, Alabama
and Mississippi and up into Ferguson, Mo. — hundreds of thousands more
are missing.
They are missing, largely because of
early deaths or because they are behind bars. Remarkably, black women
who are 25 to 54 and not in jail outnumber black men in that category by
1.5 million, according to an Upshot analysis.
For every 100 black women in this age group living outside of jail,
there are only 83 black men. Among whites, the equivalent number is 99,
nearly parity.
African-American men have long been
more likely to be locked up and more likely to die young, but the scale
of the combined toll is nonetheless jarring. It is a measure of the deep
disparities that continue to afflict black men — disparities being
debated after a recent spate of killings by the police — and the gender
gap is itself a further cause of social ills, leaving many communities
without enough men to be fathers and husbands.
Perhaps the starkest description of the
situation is this: More than one out of every six black men who today
should be between 25 and 54 years old have disappeared from daily life.
“The numbers are staggering,” said Becky Pettit, a professor of sociology at the University of Texas.
And what is the city with at least
10,000 black residents that has the single largest proportion of missing
black men? Ferguson, Mo., where a fatal police shooting
last year led to nationwide protests and a Justice Department
investigation that found widespread discrimination against black
residents. Ferguson has 60 men for every 100 black women in the age
group, Stephen Bronars, an economist, has noted.
inkstain | There is a clear possibility of a shortage declaration on Lake Mead
in August, which would force a reduction in Lower Colorado River water
deliveries, primarily to Arizona, in 2016. Nevada and Mexico would also
see small shortages. Neither California, nor the states of the Upper
Basin (New Mexico, Utah, Colorado and Wyoming) will see any
curtailments.
This is a big deal, but it is almost entirely an Arizona big deal.
Arizona currently has the slack in its system to absorb the reductions,
including possibly deeper cuts if Mead continues to drop, without major
disruptions. The Phoenix and Tucson metro areas are not going to dry up
and blow away.
Longer details below:
Built in the 1930s in a canyon on the Arizona-Nevada border, Hoover
Dam impounds Colorado River water in Lake Mead. It protects valleys
along the lower river from flooding, and stores water during wet years
for use during dry years in Nevada, Arizona, California, in the United
States, and Baja and Sonora in Mexico. From the beginning, California
has taken its share of water through an aqueduct that carries water to
Los Angeles, and a second that carries farm water to the Imperial
Valley. A significant share of the river’s water also supplies farms and
communities in Arizona along the river itself, from Parker south to
Yuma. But for the first three-plus decades of the dam’s existence,
Arizona had no way to get the river’s water to its major population
centers in the state’s central desert valleys.
In 1968, in return for political support from California to win
federal funding for the Central Arizona Project, Arizona cut a deal:
California would not block the project, which would use federal money to
build a canal to carry 1.6 million acre feet of water per year up from
the Colorado River and into Phoenix and Tucson. In return, Arizona would
agree to subordinate its priority for the 1.6 maf water to
California’s. (This Reg Manning Arizona Republic cartoon suggests some
hard feelings about all this.)
That means that if the river is short, essentially all the cuts come to Arizona’s share of the Colorado River’s water. This is important point number one:
It takes many more years of shortage before California loses a drop.
Southern California – mostly farmers in the Imperial Valley but also
urban/suburban LA and San Diego, won’t lose any water. They’ve got
enough to worry about right now with their own drought. Drought in the
Colorado River Basin won’t add to their problems.
Important point number two:
Arizona’s major on-river agricultural water users, primarily
the Colorado River Indian Tribes and the farmers of the Yuma area, also
would not lose a drop under a shortage. Their rights are older, and not crimped by the 1968 California bargain.
But what does “shortage” actually mean, and who gets to decide when the river has a shortage and deliveries are to be curtailed?
The legal authority rests with U.S. Interior Secretary Sally Jewell,
but back in 2005-07 the federal government and states decided the rules
for making the decision were too squishy, so they came up with a really
crisp definition: when the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation’s August version
of its monthly planning document known as the “24-month study” shows
that Lake Mead is expected to drop below a surface elevation of 1,075
feet above sea level, a shortage shall be declared.
BBC | In the pink-streaked twilight, a river of humanity is flowing across Tigray's dusty Hawzien plain. This cracked and desiccated landscape, in Ethiopia's far north, occupies a dark corner of the global collective memory. Thirty years ago, not far from here, the BBC's Michael Buerk first alerted us to a biblical famine he described as "the closest thing to hell on earth".
Then Bob Geldof wrote Do They Know It's Christmas? - a curious question to ask of perhaps the world's most devoutly Christian people - and thereafter the name Tigray became synonymous with refugees, Western aid and misery. The Tigrayan people were depicted as exemplars of passive suffering, dependent on the goodwill of the rest of the planet just to get through the day without dying.
But here, outside the village of Abr'ha Weatsbaha, I'm seeing a different version. From all directions, streams of people are trickling into that human river. You hear them before you see them - some chatting excitedly, others singing hymns - as they converge on a viciously steep valley at the edge of the plain. They were summoned before dawn by horns, an Old Testament echo calling every able-bodied man and woman over 18 years of age to report for the first of 20 days of compulsory community labour. Their job, quite simply, is to tame the desert.
"This is how the Axumite kings got stuff done 2,000 years ago," says my guide Zablon Beyene. "With the same tools, too."
By 10 in the morning, some 3,000 people have turned up. Using picks, shovels, iron bars and their bare hands, they will turn these treacherous slopes into neat staircases of rock-walled terraces that will trap the annual rains, forcing the water to percolate into the soil rather than running off in devastating, ground-ripping flash floods.
"Sisters are doing it for themselves," says Kidane, a pick-wielding Amazon whose arched eyebrow suggests I might want to put down my camera and do some actual work. Brothers, too: from strapping, sweat-shiny youths to Ephraim, a legless old man who clearly ignored the bit about being able-bodied and sits on his stumps, rolling rocks downhill to the terrace builders.
Overseeing this extraordinary effort is 58-year-old Aba Hawi, Abr'ha Weatsbaha's community leader. Short, pot-bellied and bearded, he darts from one side of the valley to the other, barking orders into his mobile phone, slapping backs and showing the youngsters the proper way to split half-ton boulders. Rumour has it that Aba Hawi once took up arms to fight for Tigrayan independence, but these days he prefers to describe himself as "just a farmer".
PCR | Update: Both Senator Leahy and Senator Daschle were in positions capable of blocking
the neo-Nazi PATRIOT Act. Both senators had negotiated with the Bush
regime changes in the act that made it less tyrannical. However, the
changes were not in the final draft of the act sent to Congress.
Consequently, Leahy and Daschle were resisting the rush to passage. I
have often wondered if Leahy and Daschle understood the anthrax letters
to be Washington’s warning: “Get out of the way of Tyranny or we will
kill you.”
Graeme MacQueen’s 2014 book, The 2001 Anthrax Deception: The Case for a Domestic Conspiracy, has been vindicated by the head of the FBI’s Anthrax Investigation.
Four and one-half months ago I posted a review of MacQueen’s book. http://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2014/12/02/2001-anthrax-deception-case-domestic-conspiracy/
The hired government apologists, the despicable presstitute media,
and the usual gullible patriots greeted the book with screams of
“conspiracy theory.” In fact, MacQueen’s book was a carefully
researched project that established that there indeed was a conspiracy–a
conspiracy inside the government.
It was obvious to any person familiar with the techniques that
governments use to erode liberty by destroying the protection given to
citizens by law that the purpose of the anthrax letters, especially the
letters to senators Patrick Leahy and Tom Daschle, was to raise the fear
level in order to guarantee the passage of the tyrannical PATRIOT Act.
The PATRIOT Act was a decisive blow against American liberty. The
act has served to negate the US Constitution in the 21st century and to
endow the federal government with unaccountable and tyrannical powers.
SacBee | A new state audit concludes that California state departments
illegally pad their budgets with millions of tax dollars earmarked for
employee salaries by manipulating their payroll to make it appear they
have more employees than they do.
The report released Friday on
the Department of Finance’s website did not include an estimate of how
much money departments hoard by breaking the law, but it confirms a 2014 Sacramento Bee investigation that concluded tens of millions of tax dollars earmarked to pay workers is hoarded and funneled to other purposes.
By
law, departments are supposed to forfeit money for a position that goes
unfilled for six months, returning it to its source fund for
reallocation. But as The Bee’s report and the new state audit found,
departments deceptively move employees between jobs ahead of the
six-month deadline. They accomplish the phony transfers by altering the
identifying job numbers to make it appear that a position was filled
with a transferred employee, thus avoiding a cut to their budgets.
The
unspent salary can then be used for other operating costs, such as
paying off leave balances, covering office rent, purchasing new
equipment or funding employee raises. The Bee found instances of
employees “transferring” between positions in as little as two days. In
one instance, a Department of Food and Agriculture worker moved 14 times
through nine positions in one fiscal year. Her title and workplace
never changed, but the serial numbers the state used to identify her
position changed repeatedly.
Read more here: http://www.sacbee.com/news/investigations/the-public-eye/article18239552.html#storylink=cpy
Yahoo! Tech | William Shatner. Wow. He’s 84 years old, looks 65, and juggles a schedule that would exhaust a team of 10. Book projects, TV projects, tech projects, horse-riding projects, charity projects. And his willingness to embrace the tech world is impressive; he’s got YouTube channels, he’s conducted Kickstarter projects, and he has a huge Twitter presence: more than 2 million followers. (He’s tweeted 30,000 times so far — and yes, it’s really him.)
The hour he spent with me in a Yahoo Tech Mix interview wasn’t even enough to scratch the surface.
We’ll post more of that interview shortly, but this bit couldn’t wait: “You’re gonna get a scoop here,” Shatner told me. This is it.
“California’s in the midst of a 4-year-old drought,” he said. “They tell us there’s a year’s supply of water left. If it doesn’t rain next year, what do 20 million people in the breadbasket of the world do? In a place that’s the fifth-largest GDP — if California were a country, it’d be fifth in line — we’re about to be arid!What do you do about it?”
Here’s the plan:
“So I’m starting a Kickstarter campaign. I want $30 billion … to build a pipeline like the Alaska pipeline. Say, from Seattle — a place where there’s a lot of water. There’s too much water. How bad would it be to get a large, 4-foot pipeline, keep it aboveground — because if it leaks, you’re irrigating!”
firstlook | Almost half of all Americans want to support Israel even if its interests diverge from the interests of their own country. Only
a minority of Americans (47 percent) say that their country should
pursue their own interests over supporting Israel’s when the two choices
collide. It’s the ultimate violation of George Washington’s 1796 Farewell Address warning that “nothing is more essential than that permanent, inveterate antipathies against particular nations, and passionate attachments for others, should be excluded. … The nation which indulges towards another a habitual hatred or a habitual fondness is in some degree a slave.”
It is inconceivable that a substantial portion of Americans would
want to support any other foreign country even where doing so was
contrary to U.S. interests. Only Israel commands anything near
that level of devoted, self-sacrificing fervor on the part of Americans.
So it’s certainly worth asking what accounts for this bizarre aspect of
American public opinion.
The answer should make everyone quite uncomfortable: it’s religious
fanaticism. The U.S. media loves to mock adversary nations, especially
Muslim ones, for being driven by religious extremism, but that is
undeniably a major factor, arguably the most significant one, in
explaining fervent support for Israel among the American populace. In
reporting its poll findings, Bloomberg observed:
Religion appears to play an important role in shaping the
numbers. Born-again Christians are more likely than overall poll
respondents, 58 percent to 35 percent, to back Israel regardless of U.S.
interests. Americans with no religious affiliation were the least
likely to feel this way, at 26 percent.
The primary reason evangelical Christians in the U.S. are so devoted
to Israel is simple: their radical religious dogma teaches them that God
demands this. In 2004, Pat Robertson delivered a speech
entitled “Why Evangelical Christians Support Israel” and said:
“evangelical Christians support Israel because we believe that the words
of Moses and the ancient prophets of Israel were inspired by God,” and
“we believe that the emergence of a Jewish state in the land promised by
God to Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob was ordained by God.” He added that
“God’s chosen people” — Jews — have an obligation to God to fight
against “Muslim vandals” so that Israel remains united in their hands
do-the-math | I started Do the Math in 2011 as a way to reach a larger audience
than a handful of students every year or two in an energy course at
UCSD. I had (and still have) deep concerns about the assumptions we make
as a society based on our fossil fuel trajectory over the last century
or so. Trying to steer policy from the top seemed a losing proposition:
feckless politicians hew to their constituents’ desires via a mechanism
we call democracy, so why not try to get people on board directly?
I never imagined creating a blog that would get millions of
pageviews, although this by itself falls well short of having an impact
on a grand scale. But I figured I owed it to myself to reach as many as I
might. What I have found is that a select few seem to share my
concerns. And some vocal contributors to comments strongly disagree that
we need to worry (why then make the seemingly wasted effort to respond
to—in their eyes—doomsaying kooks if in fact we need not be concerned?).
But most people simply don’t care enough to tune in. They’ve learned to
ignore prognostications of any flavor, perhaps. Lately, even fewer
people are entertaining ideas of resource limits owing to increased
global oil production (led almost entirely by U.S. shale oil) and a recovering economy.
But I think there is something more fundamental going on here. I
think we’re dealing with personality traits cooked into human nature.
Are we capable of mitigating a far-off potential calamity via proactive
efforts decades ahead of a putative crisis? In this post, I’ll use some
survey data suggesting that we may be in trouble.
Rejuvenation Pills
-
No one likes getting old. Everyone would like to be immorbid. Let's be
careful here. Immortal doesnt include youth or return to youth. Immorbid
means you s...
Death of the Author — at the Hands of Cthulhu
-
In 1967, French literary theorist and philosopher Roland Barthes wrote of
“The Death of the Author,” arguing that the meaning of a text is divorced
from au...
9/29 again
-
"On this sacred day of Michaelmas, former President Donald Trump invoked
the heavenly power of St. Michael the Archangel, sharing a powerful prayer
for pro...
Return of the Magi
-
Lately, the Holy Spirit is in the air. Emotional energy is swirling out of
the earth.I can feel it bubbling up, effervescing and evaporating around
us, s...
New Travels
-
Haven’t published on the Blog in quite a while. I at least part have been
immersed in the area of writing books. My focus is on Science Fiction an
Historic...
Covid-19 Preys Upon The Elderly And The Obese
-
sciencemag | This spring, after days of flulike symptoms and fever, a man
arrived at the emergency room at the University of Vermont Medical Center.
He ...