AIER | For two to three months, Americans have suffered the loss of liberty,
security, and prosperity in the name of virus control. The
psychological impact has been beyond description. We thought we could
count on basic rights and freedoms. Then over a few days in March, it
all ended in ways hardly anyone could believe possible.
The manner in which governments dealt with foundational principles of
modernity has been shocking. They put half the country under house
arrest and managed every movement in disregard for the Bill of Rights
and all legal precedent, to say nothing of the Constitution. It felt
like a coercive unraveling of civilization itself. It’s like we are all
waking up from a bad dream only to look around and see the wreckage that
proves it was all real.
So how can we deal with this terror that befell us? One way is to
figure out some aspect in which our sacrifice has been worth it, maybe
not on net given the consequences, but surely some good has come out of
this. If my email and feeds are correct, this is how many people have
been justifying this. The psychology here is rooted in the sunk-cost fallacy:
when you commit resources to something, even when it is a proven error,
you tend to find justifications by doubling down rather than just
admitting the mistake.
Thus have many people written me to say that whether you agree or
disagree with the lockdown, we have to admit that it has saved millions
of lives. I always write back and ask how they know that. They send me a
link to a projection – those very projections that presume all kinds of
things about cause and effect that we cannot know and which have proven
wrong time and again throughout this crisis.
So let’s just grant that it is possible that lockdowns can be
credited with slowing the spread of the virus, and perhaps preserving
hospital capacity (which turned out to be unnecessary). Still, the virus
doesn’t then get bored and move by to Wuhan or to another planet. It
still sticks around, so at best, these measures only “prolong the pain,”
in the words of Knut Wittkowski.
So even if lockdowns slow the spread in the short run, it’s not clear
that they have saved lives from the coronavirus, even if it results in more death overall from deferred surgeries and diagnostics, suicides, drug overdoses, and depression.
The trouble here is that certain features of this experience stand
out to contradict the idea that lockdowns are saving lives over the
longer term. In New York, two thirds of hospitalized patients
with COVID-19 were in fact sheltering in place during the lockdown,
essentially living in forced isolation. The lockdown didn’t help them;
it might have contributed to making matters worse.
