Monday, June 11, 2018
Who Will Have Access To Advanced Reproductive Technology?
futurism | In November 2017, a baby named Emma Gibson was born in the state of
Tennessee. Her birth, to a 25-year-old woman, was fairly typical, but
one aspect made her story unique: she was conceived 24 years prior from
anonymous donors, when Emma’s mother was just a year old. The embryo had been frozen for more than two decades before it was implanted into her mother’s uterus and grew into the baby who would be named Emma.
Most media coverage hailed Emma’s birth as a medical
marvel, an example of just how far reproductive technology has come in
allowing people with fertility issues to start a family.
Yet, the news held a small detail that gave others pause. The
organization that provided baby Emma’s embryo to her parents, the
National Embryo Donation Center (NEDC), has policies that
state they will only provide embryos to married, heterosexual couples,
in addition to several health requirements. Single women and
non-heterosexual couples are not eligible.
In other industries, this policy would effectively be labeled as
discriminatory. But for reproductive procedures in the United States,
such a policy is completely legal. Because insurers do not consider
reproductive procedures to be medically necessary, the U.S. is one of
the few developed nations without formal regulations or ethical
requirements for fertility medicine. This loose legal climate also gives
providers the power to provide or deny reproductive services at will.
The future of reproductive technology has many excited
about its potential to allow biological birth for those who might not
otherwise have been capable of it. Experiments going on today, such as
testing functional 3D-printed ovaries and incubating animal fetuses in artificial wombs,
seem to suggest that future is well on its way, that fertility medicine
has already entered the realm of what was once science fiction.
Yet, who will have access to these advances? Current trends seem to
suggest that this will depend on the actions of regulators and insurance
agencies, rather than the people who are affected the most.
By
CNu
at
June 11, 2018
0 Comments
Labels: Exponential Upside , gain of function , Genetic Omni Determinism GOD , Noo/Nano/Geno/Thermo , scientific morality
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
The Hidden Holocausts At Hanslope Park
radiolab | This is the story of a few documents that tumbled out of the secret archives of the biggest empire the world has ever known, of...
-
theatlantic | The Ku Klux Klan, Ronald Reagan, and, for most of its history, the NRA all worked to control guns. The Founding Fathers...
-
dailybeast | Of all the problems in America today, none is both as obvious and as overlooked as the colossal human catastrophe that is our...
-
Video - John Marco Allegro in an interview with Van Kooten & De Bie. TSMATC | Describing the growth of the mushroom ( boletos), P...