theconversation | Not only do we and other legal experts find these laws to be unconstitutional, we see ample evidence that they waste tax dollars.
Cities are aggressively deploying law enforcement to target people
simply for the crime of existing while having nowhere to live. In 2016
alone, Los Angeles police arrested 14,000 people experiencing
homelessness for everyday activities such as sitting on sidewalks.
San Francisco is spending some US$20 million per year to enforce laws against loitering, panhandling and other common conduct against people experiencing homelessness.
Jails and prisons make extremely expensive and ineffective homeless shelters. Non-punitive alternatives,
such as permanent supportive housing and mental health or substance
abuse treatment, cost less and work better, according to research one of
us is doing at the Homeless Rights Advocacy Project at Seattle University Law School and many other sources.
But the greatest cost of these laws is borne by already vulnerable
people who are ticketed, arrested and jailed because they are
experiencing homelessness.
Fines and court fees quickly add up to hundreds or thousands of dollars. A Sacramento man, for example, found himself facing $100,000 in fines for convictions for panhandling and sleeping outside.
These costs are impossible to pay, since the “crimes” were committed by
dint of being unable to afford keeping a roof over his head in the
first place.
And since having a criminal record makes getting jobs and housing much harder, these laws are perpetuating homelessness.
