Wednesday, August 23, 2017
The Awan Indictment is an Exercise in Prosecutorial Omission
NationalReview | To summarize, the indictment is an exercise in omission. No mention
of the Awan group’s theft of information from Congress. Not a hint
about the astronomical sums the family was paid, much of it for no-show
“work.” Not a word about Wasserman Schultz’s keeping Awan on the payroll
for six months during which (a) he was known to be under investigation,
(b) his wife was known to have fled to Pakistan, and (c) he was not
credentialed to do the IT work for which he had been hired. Nothing
about Wasserman Schultz’s energetic efforts to prevent investigators
from examining Awan’s laptop. A likely currency-transportation offense
against Alvi goes uncharged. And, as for the offenses that are charged,
prosecutors plead them in a manner that avoids any reference to what
should be their best evidence.
There is something very strange going on here.
By
CNu
at
August 23, 2017
0 Comments
Labels: Brookings , high strangeness , just-us , professional and managerial frauds , Rule of Law
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
The Hidden Holocausts At Hanslope Park
radiolab | This is the story of a few documents that tumbled out of the secret archives of the biggest empire the world has ever known, of...
-
theatlantic | The Ku Klux Klan, Ronald Reagan, and, for most of its history, the NRA all worked to control guns. The Founding Fathers...
-
dailybeast | Of all the problems in America today, none is both as obvious and as overlooked as the colossal human catastrophe that is our...
-
Video - John Marco Allegro in an interview with Van Kooten & De Bie. TSMATC | Describing the growth of the mushroom ( boletos), P...