gizmodo | The "red-pilled" ideological cuck programmer who anonymously set it off:
Stop alienating conservatives.
- Viewpoint diversity is arguably the most important type of diversity and political orientation is one of the most fundamental and significant ways in which people view things differently.
- In highly progressive environments, conservatives are a minority that feel like they need to stay in the closet to avoid open hostility. We should empower those with different ideologies to be able to express themselves.
- Alienating conservatives is both non-inclusive and generally bad business because conservatives tend to be higher in conscientiousness, which is require for much of the drudgery and maintenance work characteristic of a mature company.
Prioritize intention.
- Our focus on microaggressions and other unintentional transgressions increases our sensitivity, which is not universally positive: sensitivity increases both our tendency to take offense and our self censorship, leading to authoritarian policies. Speaking up without the fear of being harshly judged is central to psychological safety, but these practices can remove that safety by judging unintentional transgressions.
- Microaggression training incorrectly and dangerously equates speech with violence and isn’t backed by evidence.
Be open about the science of human nature.
- Once we acknowledge that not all differences are socially constructed or due to discrimination, we open our eyes to a more accurate view of the human condition which is necessary if we actually want to solve problems.
The overpaid, non-producing, Cathedralist "thought-leader" who censored the gaseous cuck.
Googlers,
I’m Danielle, Google’s brand new VP of Diversity, Integrity & Governance. I started just a couple of weeks ago, and I
had hoped to take another week or so to get the lay of the land before
introducing myself to you all. But given the heated debate we’ve seen
over the past few days, I feel compelled to say a few words.
Many
of you have read an internal document shared by someone in our
engineering organization, expressing views on the natural abilities and
characteristics of different genders, as well as whether one can speak
freely of these things at Google. And like many of you, I found that it
advanced incorrect assumptions about gender. I’m not going to link to it
here as it’s not a viewpoint that I or this company endorses, promotes
or encourages.
