theintercept | Two months before Hamas attacked Israel, the Pentagon awarded a multimillion-dollar contract to build U.S. troop facilities for a secret base it maintains deep within Israel’s Negev desert, just 20 miles from Gaza. Code-named “Site 512,” the longstanding U.S. base is a radar facility that monitors the skies for missile attacks on Israel.
On October 7, however, when thousands of Hamas rockets were launched, Site 512 saw nothing — because it is focused on Iran, more than 700 miles away.The U.S. Army is quietly moving ahead with construction at Site 512, a classified base perched atop Mt. Har Qeren in the Negev, to include what government records describe as a “life support facility”: military speak for barracks-like structures for personnel.
Though President Joe Biden and the White House insist that there are no plans to send U.S. troops to Israel amid its war on Hamas, a secret U.S. military presence in Israel already exists. And the government contracts and budget documents show it is evidently growing.
The $35.8 million U.S. troop facility, not publicly announced or previously reported, was obliquely referenced in an August 2 contract announcement by the Pentagon. Though the Defense Department has taken pains to obscure the site’s true nature — describing it in other records merely as a “classified worldwide” project — budget documents reviewed by The Intercept reveal that it is part of Site 512. (The Pentagon did not immediately respond to a request for comment.)
“Sometimes something is treated as an official secret not in the hope that an adversary would never find out about it but rather [because] the U.S. government, for diplomatic or political reasons, does not want to officially acknowledge it,” Paul Pillar, a former chief analyst at the CIA’s counterterrorism center who said he had no specific knowledge of the base, told The Intercept. “In this case, perhaps the base will be used to support operations elsewhere in the Middle East in which any acknowledgment that they were staged from Israel, or involved any cooperation with Israel, would be inconvenient and likely to elicit more negative reactions than the operations otherwise would elicit.”
Rare acknowledgment of the U.S. military presence in Israel came in 2017, when the two countries inaugurated a military site that the U.S. government-funded Voice of America deemed “the first American military base on Israeli soil.” Israeli Air Force’s Brig. Gen. Tzvika Haimovitch called it “historic.” He said, “We established an American base in the State of Israel, in the Israel Defense Forces, for the first time.”
johnhelmer | If we abstract from the versions about the eschatological motives of
the parties to the conflict and various hypotheses about the scenario of
how events developed, the Al-Aqsa Flood operation exposed three
vulnerabilities of the Israelis of a military intelligence nature:
— a failure in strategic intelligence regarding the plans and
intentions of Hamas. Although, based on the received HUMINT [human
intelligence] data, there were warnings from the Egyptian intelligence
services. The Israelis position their technical intelligence
capabilities as dominant [above their human intelligence].
— the discrepancy between the capabilities of the advanced, expensive
Iron Dome missile defense system and the requirements for repelling the
direct and asymmetric threats [employed by Hamas].
— strategic miscalculation in the use of a complex, high-tech,
expensive security barrier around the perimeter of the Gaza Strip. The
construction of the barrier strategically set restrictions on offensive
manoeuvre for the IDF and the ability of the Israelis to anticipate.
Hamas has gained thereby the operational initiative – the mobility of
their forces against the static dispersion of the Israelis. Considering
the barrier impenetrable before the operation, the Israelis had
relocated most of their regular forces to northern-sector control of the
territories near the borders of Lebanon and Syria,and to the West Bank.
The “great Israeli wall” has appeared to be almost totally useless.
Hamas overcame it in a short time, which allowed it to operate almost
unhindered in the adjacent territories. The disabling of [the IDF’s]
technological means demonstrated the lack of the human resources to
respond. In terms of communications, the dependence of the Israeli
forces on wireless data transmission has become a critical
vulnerability.
As in the case of Iron Dome, the Israelis relied on technological
solutions, methods, and thinking, neglecting the principle of war being
waged by people, not by machines (yet). To this is added a doctrinal
and strategic discrepancy with the actual conditions of combat.
Technological superiority was placed at the forefront, but the complex
systems showed vulnerability to a cascade of failures, leading the
system to collapse. A regional conflict would make this catastrophic.
[*] The lead cartoons are, left, by Carlos Latuff in Brazil in 2006 and, right, by Mr Fish in the US (Harper’s Magazine)
also in 2006. They have been reproduced by Evan Jones in a collection
of western media cartoons on the meaning of anti-Semitism as an
information warfare weapon in US-Israeli military operations against the
Arabs until editorial censorship was imposed in both the UK and US. Click to read.
[**] Read the 80-year old story of the German General Staff
plans for the Arab states and Hitler’s failure to implement them,
followed by the plans of Coon, the OSS, and the CIA homicidalists
against the Arabs, which are still being followed in Washington and Tel
Aviv. Click. On Saturday night, October 28,
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu blamed his intelligence
services and military staff for failing to warn him of the Hamas war
plan. Under counter-attack from the services and the military, Netanyahu
then apologised and retracted his claims. The Israeli press record of
the episode reveals that the entire Israeli political and military
leadership shares the same racial superiority doctrine.
[***] In a special session of security officials called to discuss the Makhachkala airport incidents, President Vladimir Putin said:
“We must clearly understand who in reality is behind the tragedy of the
peoples of the Middle East and other regions of the world, who
organizes deadly chaos, who benefits from it. Today, in my opinion, it
has already become obvious and understandable for everyone – customers
act openly and brazenly. It is the current ruling elites of the United
States and their satellites that are the main beneficiaries of global
instability. They extract their bloody rent from it. Their strategy is
also obvious. The United States as a global superpower – everyone sees
it, understands it, even according to trends in the global economy – is
weakening, losing its position. The American-style world, with one
hegemon, is being destroyed, is leaving, gradually but steadily going
into the past…The events in Makhachkala last night were inspired,
including through social networks, not least from the territory of
Ukraine, by the hands of agents of Western special services. I want to
ask myself in this regard: is it possible to help Palestine by trying to
attack the Tats and their families? Tats, by the way, are the titular
nation in Dagestan. Palestine can only be helped in the fight against
those who are behind this tragedy. We, Russia, are fighting them as part
of a special military operation, it is with them – both for ourselves
and for those who strive for real, true freedom.”
johnhelmer.net | In the first direct Russian warning
to the US Navy force in the Eastern Mediterranean, Zakharova added:
“So far we see that the situation is developing along the path of
escalation. There is a great risk of involving third forces in this
conflict. And this is fraught with long-term consequences for the region
and for the world.”
Putin followed in the evening on the telephone with the Turkish
President, Recep Tayyip Erdogan. “The need for an immediate ceasefire by
both sides and the resumption of the negotiation process was
emphasised,” according to the Kremlin’s communiqué.
“Mutual readiness to actively contribute to this was expressed…Separate
issues of Russian-Turkish cooperation in various fields were also
touched upon.”
Erdogan’s press release
was more revealing. He and Putin had “touched upon what initiatives can
be taken to meet humanitarian needs in the region, as the Turkish
president told Putin that targeting civilian settlements is worrying and
Türkiye does not welcome such move.” Erdogan’s twitter announcement
adds: “President Erdoğan and President Putin of Russia also exchanged
views on potential initiatives to meet humanitarian needs in the
region.”
This is a hint that Erdogan and Putin are contemplating a Turkish
ship convoy of aid to Gaza, protected from Israeli attack by the Russian
Navy from its Tartous base on the Syrian coast, and by the Russian Air
Force from Hmeimim. This humanitarian operation by sea would aim at
breaking the blockade of the coast by the Israelis, and running the
gauntlet of the USS Gerald Ford and its squadron further offshore. If this operation, a reminder of the Gaza Flotilla of 2010,
is in planning now – the open signals are warning Washington and the
US Navy to expect it – then the confrontation, and the risk to the US
and Israel of strategic defeat at sea, are unprecedented.
The planning of Russian military protection of seaborne humanitarian aid convoys to the Gaza also extends to Egypt.
This was touched on in the conversation which Egyptian Foreign Minister Sameh Shoukry had with Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov. That was followed by Egyptian press disclosure
of Israeli warnings, following by bombings, to stop Egyptian trucks
delivering aid into Gaza across the Rafah land bridge at the southern
end of Gaza.
An alternative Egyptian option is a naval convoy. If this will be
coordinated through the Kremlin and the Russian Defense Ministry with an
Erdogan-Putin plan of a Turkish convoy sailing from the north, the
escalation to regional and superpower level will have materialised
before the Israeli invasion of Gaza can preempt it.
The Russian Defense Ministry has not been silent towards Israel in
the past. Since the ambush by the Israel Air Force of the Russian Il-20
surveillance aircraft, and the killing of its 15-man crew in September
2018, the General Staff has said it has been reserving its moves against the Israelis while identifying them as the enemy.
Vzglyad, the Moscow platform for Russian military and security thinking, editorialised on April 17, 2023,
that in siding with the Ukraine during the Special Military Operation,
the Israeli government had become Russia’s adversary: “The time has come
to take a new position on the Palestinian issue. To take the
celebration of Al-Quds Day to a new level, as well as to take a more
pro-Palestinian position in the Middle East conflict. To stand on the
side of those who help Russia within the framework of their own
interests (Iran, Saudi Arabia) against those who help our enemies. And
thereby to send a very clear signal to the world – a signal that Russia
will treat its partners exactly as they treat it. To help supporters –
and not to act in the interests of opponents.”
The creation of a humanitarian corridor was explicitly mentioned in the Foreign Ministry briefing on Tuesday. “Tensions
are rising in the West Bank of the Jordan River. There are high risks
of the conflict spreading to the area of the Lebanese-Israeli border and
drawing new parties into it. A large-scale humanitarian catastrophe is
unfolding before our eyes. The main thing now is to cease fire and stop
the bloodshed. We support the efforts of interested parties aimed at
solving this priority task. This would make it possible to avoid new
victims, end the suffering of the civilian population, ensure its
evacuation through humanitarian corridors and prevent the situation from
sliding into a region-wide humanitarian catastrophe. This is not just a
crisis or an emergency. We are talking about the fate of millions of
people.”
Spokesman Zakharova also struck at the CIA and the Pentagon for their
surprise defeat by Hamas. “How did it happen that in a year; that’s how
much time the operation was being prepared for, then carried out now in
a few days, the United States as Israel’s closest ally did not warn
about this? They have satellites everywhere, appropriate tracking
devices, military bases, including in the region. There are all the
possibilities to carry out, not just monitoring, but surveillance — the
facts speak for themselves — of all information circulating on
American-made equipment (hardware and software). For the whole year of
preparing such a large-scale operation, the United States with all the
power of its special services did not transmit anything to Israel as
intelligence…How did it happen that during the whole year of preparation
of the corresponding operation in the Middle East, the United States
did not transmit any information to its partners in Israel?”
By contrast, the Foreign Ministry spokesman said, “for two months at
the end of 2021 and two months at the beginning of 2022, the United
States at all levels told how Russia would ‘attack’ Ukraine. This was
done specifically to create an information backdrop in order to divert
the eyes of the whole world from how, for all these years, the United
States and their NATO colleagues (primarily the United Kingdom) have
been pumping Ukraine with weapons and creating the anti-Russia project,
an anti-Russian springboard…After the corresponding instruction from
Washington, a multiple increase in the shelling of Donbass by the regime
of V.A. Zelensky followed. Then, in late 2021-early 2022, the US ‘knew
everything’ and told everyone. But in the area of their direct
responsibility — the Middle East has always been one of them — in
relation to the closest ally over which the American protectorate is
carried out, the US special services, the State Department and the White
House did not transmit any information necessary for self-defence.”
cynthiachung | [This
is a chapter from my newly released book ‘The Empire on Which the Black
Sun Never Set: the Birth of International Fascism and Anglo-American
Foreign Policy.’ For further details on different formats and how to
purchase click here.] The audio version of this chapter is available
here.
However, this is not the only blunder that the Canadian government has made recently and has blamed “ze Russians” for.
On
February 27, 2022, Canadian Deputy Prime Minister Chrystia Freeland
held a scarf bearing the slogan “Slava Ukraini,” meaning “Glory to
Ukraine,” with the “Blood and Soil” colors of the Ukrainian Insurgent
Army (UPA) (who collaborated with the Nazis during WWII and massacred Jews and Poles).
According to Freeland’s press secretary, this was just another case of a “classic KGB disinformation smear… accusing Ukrainians and Ukrainian-Canadians of being far right extremists or fascists or Nazis,” which is a confusing statement on multiple levels.
It
is not clear how this was a case of “Russian disinformation,” since the
picture is indeed authentic, Freeland did not deny this. And she was
indeed holding a “Blood and Soil” emblem, which originated with the
Nazis, clear for everyone to see. Lastly, it is confusing as to why the
Canadian government seems to be unaware that the KGB no longer exists.
Are they also under the impression that the Soviet Union still exists?
Not
irrelevant in all of this is the fact that Freeland’s grandfather was
the chief editor of a Nazi newspaper during WWII in Galicia and that she
is indeed aware of this and apparently unapologetic. Whenever she is
questioned about this, she does not deny anything, but simply blames
such a focus of inquiry on Russian disinformation with the intent to
“destabilize Western democracies.”
Interestingly, it was the Canadian newspaper “The Globe and Mail” who reported this story,
titled “Freeland knew her grandfather was editor of Nazi newspaper,”
thus, not a Russian publication last time I checked. And upon whom did
they base such information? None other than Freeland’s own uncle,
John-Paul Himka, who was at the time professor emeritus at the
University of Alberta.
dailycaller | Top Republican lawmakers requested information from Department of
Homeland Security (DHS) Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas regarding an agency
group that will include former intelligence officials who signed a
letter suggesting the Hunter Biden laptop was a “Russian information
operation,” according to a copy of a Thursday letter first obtained by
the Daily Caller News Foundation.
DHS tapped
former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, former CIA
Director John Brennan and former CIA Operations Officer Paul Kolbe, all
of whom signed an October 2020 letter
casting doubt on the legitimacy of the Hunter Biden laptop as Russian
disinformation, to join the Homeland Intelligence Experts Group. In
response, House Homeland Security Committee Chairman Mark Green and
Republican Texas Rep. August Pfluger are demanding to know DHS’
selection process for the group’s members, according to a copy of the letter.
“Multiple members of this Homeland Intelligence Expert
Group have shown an utter disregard for the truth, not to mention brazen
political bias. Does Secretary Mayorkas really think appointing leading
Russian-collusion hoaxers will increase trust in his department?
Clearly, he doesn’t care,” Green said in a statement to the DCNF.
Both Clapper and Brennan have been previously criticized for misleading the American public. On multiple occasions, Clapper gave incorrect information to Congress.
Clapper gave “inconsistent testimony” about contacts he had with the media while in office, Republicans charged. Additionally, Brennan denied that CIA officials had hacked the computers of Senate Intelligence Committee staffers, a statement that was later proven false.
“James Clapper and John Brennan have no place in
positions of power—much less on a board of so-called experts where they
will surely continue to serve as partisan Democrat operatives disguised
as national security officials. The Department of Homeland Security must
dispense with its disinformation boards and expert groups and focus on
the real national security issues facing our country—such as the
thousands of illegal migrants crossing our southern border on a daily
basis,” Pfluger, who serves as the chairman of the Subcommittee on
Counterterrorism, Law Enforcement, and Intelligence, said in a statement
to the DCNF.
The group will meet four times per year to advise
DHS on intelligence and national security efforts regarding issues such
as “terrorism, fentanyl, transborder issues, and emerging technology,”
DHS said.
DHS didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment.
Allen Dulles was a part of Operation Sunrise and it appears he went
against orders and did not negotiate an unconditional surrender but
instead brokered deals with the nazis. It doesn't help that nazi
sympathy was fairly rampant throughout the military and government hence
the willingness to proceed with Operation Paperclip. Dulles worked for a
law firm that protected IG Farben (corporation that participated in
slave labor and genocide) and I'm currently looking into his prewar
antics as it appears he may have been involved in helping fund the rise
of the nazis from the beginning. Money was apparently stolen from a bank
in England. Also, during the war Dulles had his OSS operation set up in
Switzerland. The Swiss bank basically legitimatized the nazi's money
and the idea that they were "neutral" is kind of ridiculous. The nazi's
couldn't have operated without those bank accounts so taking their money
was aiding and abetting. I still need to sit down and follow all the
money, but some really fucky things were going on before the war even
broke out. Don't forget the 1930's failed business plot to install a
fascist leader in the US. The people involved in that likely came up
with some new plans.
It's pretty amazing how the US
reshaped Wernher von Braun's public persona. He was literally an SS Major and the
director of a military unit making the most advanced weapon systems for
the Nazis. You don't get in those positions without being heavily
involved in the Nazi party.
The
dossier on him literally has a 'carrot' style insertion to change
"ardent Nazi" to "not an ardent Nazi." He went from a leader of Nazis
to literally hosting shows on Disney about space travel.
There's quite a bit there, actually,
from the Vatican-NAZI connection in the whole UFO affair, to the Knights
of Malta in more recent years.
I'll start at a random point of connection:
Dulles helped Mengele flee to Argentina, where the CIA later supported a right-wing authoritarian coup
So there's a global intelligence service / NAZI connection.
Here's the main Vatican - NAZI link: The Vatican got independence from Mussolini, who was soon allied with Hitler.
David
Grusch has talked about the Vatican - NAZI - UFO connection, and there
has been, from the beginning, a broad connection with intelligence
services.
There's another
interesting Vatican-Intelligence service link with the Knights of Malta,
the only nation on the planet without any territory, it has diplomatic
relations with over 100 countries, issues its own passports, is
controlled by the Vatican, and has prominent representatives in the US
intelligence services.
CIA
Director William Casey was a member of the Knights of Malta. William
F. Buckley Jr was a member of the Knights of Malta. James J. Angleton
was a member.
Buckley was also a
member of the Skull and Bones -- the same secret society both George W.
Bush (son of former CIA director George HW Bush) and his 2004
Presidential competitor John Kerry both belonged to (the same year no
less), but which neither would discuss
So there's a CIA-Vatican-NAZI-Secret Society international right-wing apparatus that took hold on planet Earth around 1945.
I could keep going with this but I have other things to do.
But
I will say the US Navy -- where the videos started leaking from -- is
tied into all this to. It was, for example, and Naval intelligence
officer Dr. Charles Savage was involved in LSD experiments with programs
that became MKULTRA
and,
as we keep hearing, there seems to be an inter-dimensional component to
all this, which LSD may sensitize people to. Like information about
UFO's, the cognitive states unlocked by LSD are tightly controlled. LSD
in the US is a schedule I substance, more tightly controlled than
cocaine, and as tightly controlled as heroin.
Religious
scholars like Huston Smith argued that the prohibition on psychedelics
may be a prohibition on human cognitive evolution, since this experience
has been with humanity since early times
So
there may be a NAZI-CIA-Vatican-UFO-Industry conspiracy that is both
keeping technology from us, and also keeping our minds under tight
control by limiting our ability to perceive non-desirable aspects of
reality.
There's a shit ton of baggage in there.
Bonus weirdness:
Timothy Leary was using LSD to channel messages from aliens in Sirius
12:00 onwards - Grusch outlines that leakers are under penalty of imprisonment and execution.
16:50
onward “non human Biologics” he stated in an interview previously
they’re pilots and he doesn’t know what their actual job was. They were
“nonhuman intelligence” pilots.
18:00 onward he was cleared by the Pentagon to talk about this.
19:00
onward Grusch insinuates that the initial reasoning for hiding the
information was the ontological shock it would cause in society due to
society’s religiousness at the time, along with concealing the
information from adversaries like Russia.
20:40
onward - the officials involved in the Manhattan Project also created
the laws related to obfuscation and secrecy of the topic. 21:28 -
retrieved UAP materials that give off radiation are classified under the
Atomic Energy Act (intentionally).
23:00
onward - there was a deeper classified project (related to the
Manhattan Project) studying UFOs aside from Project Blue Book
28:00
onward- Grusch states that it’s hard to tell how far ahead their (the
nonhuman intelligence) technology is. “It’s hard to state how far in
advance it is. You’re just assuming some sort of linear progression.
They’ve made an asymptotal leap that put them over the edge. They’re
similarly as advanced as us but they’ve had an asymmetric evolution they
went a different path than us. While we’ve made nuclear weapons,
they’ve made a propulsion discovery but they’re not that much more
advanced than you and I”.
29:50-
Grusch states that once we unlocked nuclear power we made major
technological strides. We may be one discovery away from manipulating
spacetime.
30:29- the UFOs are interested in our nuclear technology.
36:00
onward - Grusch references Lue Elizondo’s comment on the ETs studying
us and it’s possible the UFO crashes were intentionally seeded to test
humanity’s development in relation to being exposed to this technology.
42:00 onwards - there may have been scientific breakthroughs that were hidden from the public.
44:00
- Dr Hal Puthoff of the Pentagon insinuates that antigravity research
did get somewhere (made progress) and then was hidden.
47:00 onward - UFO metamaterials are discussed.
59:50- the connection of the “UFO Disclosure” movement (and intentional disinformation) to the “elite” is described by the host.
1:04:00
onwards - there’s a long history of “UFO debunkers” being directly
linked to government organizations that have actually studied UAP.
1:17:28- this portion is interesting since it references information that Elizondo and Dr Garry Nolan have stated.
For
background, Elizondo (Pentagon), Dr. Garry Nolan (accomplished academic
who was approached by the CIA to study UAPs, also stated they told him
information regarding the beings operating the crafts), and John Ramirez
[CIA- was referenced as having worked there separately by Jim Semivan
of the CIA, referenced in this article (https://www.benzinga.com/amp/content/34082411)] have all stated, in summary, that members within the defense establishment believe these beings are bioengineered AI.
Grusch
notably references this at this time stamp as a possibility to what
these beings are. If you notice, he goes out of his way to reference
specifically what Elizondo had stated in a past interview, that the ETs
are designed to look humanoid to interact with humans. (In Elizondo’s
interview, he brought up an example of how zookeepers in China disguise
themselves as pandas to interact with the pandas, and what we are seeing
is a similar situation).
1:19:30-
ETs being our descendants from the future is discussed. The host
describes this as being a possible reason for the ET
non-interventionism. As in, they don’t want to harm the timeline too
much such that their own existence is nullified. (My note: it would be
interesting if some of what people have witnessed is in fact humans from
the future that have mastered ET propulsion and time travel technology,
which is why they only appear fleetingly in some instances and choose
not to intervene in major events).
1:27:00
onward - military sensory systems disproportionately detect UFOs since
their collection mechanisms are more advanced than what’s available to
the average person.
1:32:30 onward - Grusch details how being on the Autism spectrum have shaped his interactions.
Grusch
background (wiki): David Charles Grusch is a decorated Afghanistan
combat veteran and former Air Force intelligence officer[1] who worked
in the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency (NGA) and the National
Reconnaissance Office (NRO).[2][3][4][5] From 2019 to 2021, he was the
representative of the NRO to the Unidentified Aerial Phenomena Task
Force.[3][4][6] From late 2021 to July 2022, he was the co-lead for UAP
analysis at the NGA and its representative to the task force.[2] He
assisted in drafting the National Defense Authorization Act of 2023,[7]
which includes provisions for reporting of UFOs, including whistleblower
protections and exemptions to non-disclosure orders and
agreements.[8][9][10] Congressional interest in UFO sightings
immediately prior to Grusch's public claims surrounded questions about
the four objects that the Air Force shot down in February 2023.[11]
salon | It’s one of the enduring mysteries of Barack Obama’s presidency, as
it sinks toward the sunset: How did this suave and intelligent guy, with
the cosmopolitan demeanor, the sardonic sense of humor and the instinct
for an irresistible photo-op, end up running the most hidden, most
clandestine and most secrecy-obsessed administration in American
history? And what does the fact that nobody in the 2016 campaign — not
Bernie Sanders, not Hillary Clinton, not anybody — ever talks about this
mean for the future? The answer to the second question is easy: Nothing
good. The answer to the first one might be that those things are
unrelated: Personality doesn’t tell us anything about policy, and our
superficial judgments about political leaders are often meaningless.
Bill Moyers warned me about this some years ago, when I asked him how
he evaluated George W. Bush as a person. He wasn’t much interested in
character or personality in politics, he said. Lyndon Johnson had been
one of the most difficult people he’d ever known, and Moyers had never
liked him, but Johnson was an extraordinarily effective politician. I
wasn’t sharp enough to ask the obvious follow-up question, which was
whether Johnson’s personal flaws had fed into his disastrous policy
errors in Vietnam.
Bill Moyers has forgotten more about politics than I will ever know, but the thing is, I do
perceive a relationship between surface and substance, and I believe we
learn something important about people almost right away. George W.
Bush was profoundly incurious about the world, and insulated by layers
of smarter people and money. Richard Nixon was always a creep. Bill
Clinton wanted to make you cry and get your panties off. Ronald Reagan
never had any idea what day it was. Barack Obama seems like a smart,
funny, cool guy, and maybe he’s too much of all those things for his own
good. Maybe we will look back decades from now and perceive the Obama
paradox — the baffling relationship between his appealing persona and
his abysmal record on surveillance, government secrecy and national
security — in a different light. For one thing, whatever they told him
between November of 2008 and January of 2009 must have been really
scary.
I called up John Kiriakou, a former CIA agent who spent 23 months in
federal prison thinking this stuff over, to see if he could help.
Kiriakou is one of the nine government leakers or whistleblowers that
the Obama White House and/or the Justice Department has sought to
prosecute under the Espionage Act, a law passed under Woodrow Wilson
during World War I that was meant to target double agents working for
foreign governments. (Among the other eight actual or prospective
defendants are Chelsea Manning and Edward Snowden.) Under all previous
presidents, incurious George included, the Espionage Act was used for
that purpose exactly three times. If you’re keeping score, that’s nine
attempted prosecutions in seven years, versus three in 91 years.
Kiriakou had a whole lot to say, especially about former Attorney
General Eric Holder and current CIA director John Brennan, whom he sees
as the prime movers behind the administration’s secrets-and-lies agenda —
and also as the guys who railroaded him over what he describes as a
minor indiscretion. Kiriakou spent 15 years in the CIA, first as an
analyst and then as a covert operative. He was involved in the capture
of Abu Zubaydah, and apparently knew that the alleged senior al-Qaida
operative was waterboarded by CIA interrogators, although he was not
directly involved.
off-guardian | The first group of privatizations occurred in the first fascist nation, Italy, in the 1920s; and the second group of privatizations occurred in the second fascist nation,
Germany, in the 1930s. Privatizations started under Mussolini, and then
were instituted under Hitler. That got the fascist ball rolling; and,
after a few decades of hiatus in the wake of fascism’s embarrassing
supposed defeat in WW II, it resurfaced and then surged yet again after
1970, when fascist forces in the global aristocracy, such as via the
CIA, IMF, Bilderberg group, and Trilateral Commission, imposed the
global reign of the world’s main private holders of bonds and of stocks:
the world’s aristocrats are taking on an increasing percentage of what
were previously public assets.
Privatizations, after starting in fascisms during the pre-WWII years,
resumed again in the 1970s under the fascist Chilean leader Augusto
Pinochet; and in the 1980s under the fascist British leader Margaret
Thatcher (a passionate supporter of apartheid in South Africa) and also
under the smiling fascist American leader Ronald Reagan (who followed
the prior success of Richard Nixon’s “Southern Strategy” of White
domination in the by-then resurgent-conservative U.S., and might even be
said to have been America’s first fully fascist President); and in the
1990s under several fascist (formerly communist) leaders throughout the
former Soviet Union, under the guidance of Harvard University’s fascist economics department,
which transferred control from the former nomenklatura, to the new
(Western-dependent) “oligarchs,” all under the virtual guidance of its
former head, Lawrence Summers, who then was serving as the World Bank
President.
Mussolini was the man-of-the-future, but — after Franklin Delano
Roosevelt died, and finally Thatcher and Reagan and other
‘free-marketeers’ came into office — Mussolini’s “future” has
increasingly become our own “now”: the Axis Powers’ ideology has
actually been winning in the post-WW-II world. Only, this time, it’s
called instead by such names as “libertarianism” or “neo-liberalism,” no
longer “fascism,” so that only the true-believing fascists, the
aristocrats, will even know that it’s actually fascism. It’s their Big
Con. It’s their Big Lie. Just renaming fascism as “libertarianism” or
“neo-liberalism,” has fooled the masses to think that it’s
pro-democratic. “Capitalism” has thus come to be re-defined to refer to
only the aristocratically controlled form of capitalism: fascism. The
ideological battle has thus apparently been won by a cheap
terminological deceit. That’s all it takes for dictatorship to be able
to win.
The democratically controlled form of capitalism, such as in some
northern European countries, has commonly been called “socialism”; and,
of course, it’s opposed to all forms of dictatorship, both communist and
fascist. Socialism is the democratic form of capitalism. It’s not the
dictatorial form of socialism, which is Marxism. It’s the form of
capitalism that serves the public, instead of the aristocracy, at any
point where the two have conflicting interests. It subordinates the
aristocracy to the public. Fascism instead subordinates the public to
the aristocracy, which is the natural tendency (because the “World’s Richest 0.7% Own 13.67 Times as Much as World’s Poorest 68.7%,” and the “World’s Richest 80 People Own Same Amount as World’s Bottom 50%”).
nih.gov | In 1995, U.S. President Clinton, by order number
1995‐4‐17 entitled “Classified National Security Information,”
declassified several research programs (among other contents) funded by
the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) and Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) of the United States (Puthoff, 1996). These covert programs were developed over more than 20 years at the Stanford Research Institute (SRI, now SRI International) and the Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC) (cf. Srinivasan, 2002).
Programs addressed remote viewing (RV), that is, determined whether
certain individuals, under conditions of perceptual isolation, could
access information about places, buildings, photographs, etc., from a
distance using putative psi rather than conventional sensory channels
(Targ, 2019).
The specific objective was to explore whether RV phenomena had enough
consistency and stability for use in military espionage (McMoneagle, 2015; Puthoff, 1996).
Due to the Cold War and ensuing political‐military tensions between the
United States and the former Soviet Union, American Congress classified
these programs in the interests of national security (Targ, 1996).
The fact that the RV experiments were hidden or classified undermined
transparency in scientific research practices. Specifically, other
laboratories were not given access to information and were unable to
evaluate outcomes with proper methodological or statistical rigor (see
the critique by Hyman, 1996 and Nelson et al., 1996).
1.1. What is remote viewing?
RV is an experiential technique for altered‐anomalous states (see Utts, 1995, 1996, 1995, 1996, 2018) that allows two types of anomalous cognitions to be subjected to empirical scrutiny (see also Schooler et al., 2018): (a) precognition (also called anticipation of unpredictable stimuli or anomalous anticipation of information, Mossbridge et al., 2012)
can be defined as the process by which a person accesses information
about the future (i.e., events that have not yet happened) without using
sensory or otherwise rational channels recognized by conventional
scientific theory (Bem, 2011); and (b) retro‐cognition (also called anomalous information reception or clairvoyance)
is defined as the process by which a person accesses content referring
to the past (i.e., content that has already happened) without using the
conventional channels of biology or logic per current scientific theory
(Marwaha & May, 2016). The expression psi phenomena or psi
is a hypothetical construct that has the same definition attributed to
anomalous cognitions. However, the term anomalous cognitions is a more
neutral label, as the term psi is often used by
parapsychologists. All these concepts have been sharply criticized on
methodological, statistical, or conceptual grounds (e.g., Escolà‐Gascón,
2022a; Houran et al., 2018; Reber & Alcock, 2020; Wagenmakers et al., 2011).
In RV, the participant is asked to visualize the information they intend to access (from the past or the future) (Roe et al., 2020). Then, the participant must mentally and nonverbally represent the distant target or targets to be guessed (May et al., 2011; Scott, 1988). The target is often a specific place, person, or fact (May, 1996; Puthoff, 1996; Targ, 1996). The targets of RV experiments (published in Nature, see Targ & Puthoff, 1974) contained specific meanings of interest to U.S. national security (e.g., the location of a secret military base) (see Utts, 1995, 1996, 1995, 1996, 2018). The present study focused on RV relative to anomalous information reception, as it is one of the most researched anomalous phenomena showing significant results (see Bem et al., 2016; Tressoldi & Storm, 2021). Unfortunately, the abbreviation for anomalous information reception (AIR) is the same as the abbreviation for the American Institutes for Research (also AIR) and we wish to prevent confusion. So, henceforth, we use the terms anomalous cognitions and RV to refer exclusively to anomalous information reception.
Since
1972, the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) commissioned several
research programs on remote viewing (RV) that were progressively
declassified from 1995 to 2003. The main objectives of this research
were to statistically replicate the original findings and address the
question: What are the underlying cognitive mechanisms involved in RV?
The research focused on emotional intelligence (EI) theory and intuitive
information processing as possible hypothetical mechanisms.
Methods
We
used a quasi‐experimental design with new statistical control
techniques based on structural equation modeling, analysis of
invariance, and forced‐choice experiments to accurately objectify
results. We measured emotional intelligence with the Mayer—Salovey–Caruso Emotional Intelligence Test.
A total of 347 participants who were nonbelievers in psychic
experiences completed an RV experiment using targets based on location
coordinates. A total of 287 participants reported beliefs in psychic
experiences and completed another RV experiment using targets based on
images of places. Moreover, we divided the total sample into further
subsamples for the purpose of replicating the findings and also used
different thresholds on standard deviations to test for variation in
effect sizes. The hit rates on the psi‐RV task were contrasted with the
estimated chance.
Results
The
results of our first group analysis were nonsignificant, but the
analysis applied to the second group produced significant RV‐related
effects corresponding to the positive influence of EI (i.e., hits in the
RV experiments were 19.5% predicted from EI) with small to moderate
effect sizes (between 0. 457 and 0.853).
Conclusions
These
findings have profound implications for a new hypothesis of anomalous
cognitions relative to RV protocols. Emotions perceived during RV
sessions may play an important role in the production of anomalous
cognitions. We propose the Production‐Identification‐Comprehension (PIC) emotional model as a function of behavior that could enhance VR test success.
espionagehistoryarchive | We’ve analyzed 007 in the past, as well as Howard Hughes in light of Scorcese’s The Aviator,
but could there be a connection between the two? What if Ian Fleming
was encoding an explosive, real-world conspiracy involving Howard
Hughes, JFK, Aristotle Onassis and a legendary kidnapping? Not only is
there evidence to suggest this, but the film version of his 1954 novel Diamonds Are Forever
subtly suggests much more. We know Fleming was a high-level Royal Navy
psychological warfare specialist and involved in numerous covert
operations, and as I’ve argued many times, Fleming’s novels and the film
versions, in their own respective ways, elucidate these clandestine
activities, touching on everything from black-market smuggling networks
to actual espionage and assassinations.
Fleming’s inspiration for the novel stemmed from meetings and
discussions with former MI5 chief Sir Percy Stillitoe, then working for
the DeBeers diamond empire. Combined with these tips, as well
as information he received from wealthy socialite William Woodward
and Los Angeles police intelligence on organized crime and smuggling
operations, Fleming composed the fourth Bond novel in 1954 as a literary
means of detailing the dark world of precious gem and jewel markets. To
add intrigue to this already intriguing tale, Fleming was also
approached by Aristotle Onassis for a film version of either Casino Royale or Dr. No, with Onassis desiring to be a part of the funding (Ian Fleming
by Andrew Lycett, pgs. 336-7). No stranger to Hollywood, Onassis was
also a friend of numerous tinsel-town heavyweights, including the Greek
film executive Spyros Skouras.
With these connections, my thesis here, in concert with the fascinating insight of Basil Valentine, is that Diamonds Are Forever the film provides a crucial insight into the coded reference of Willard Whyte as a stand in for Howard Hughes. As I argued in my Scorcese analysis, Hughes was intimately tied to the CIA through Robert Maheu,
an intelligence-establishment figure who emerged from the CIA-dominated
advertising world. It is possible Maheu was involved in the reported
kidnapping escapade of Hughes, which TheGemstone Files allege was orchestrated by Onassis, leading to Hughes being spirited away to the magnate’s lavish island, Skorpios.
In regard to Diamonds Are Forever the 1971 film, it is a
curious note that Whyte, the Hughes stand-in, is said to have been
kidnapped and/or never emerging from his penthouse for years. As it
turns out, it is the inimical Bond villain Blofeld, and particularly
Ernst Stavro Blofeld, that is behind the
diamond smuggling plot as a means of moving in on Whyte’s aerospace
operations. If Basil’s thesis is correct, then Stavro could be a
composite of Onassis and Niarchos, the brother-in-law of Onassis and a
rival shipping magnate. Stavros Niarchos is reported to have been
counted as a Bilderberg member, as well as being a close associate of the Rockefeller Foundation for certain. These considerations are admittedly speculative.
When we consider Hughes’ close connection to the CIA through operations like Project AZORIAN,
which sounds just like a SPECTRE-style operation from a 007 film, we
can certainly presume much more was being conveyed here. Even questions
relating to the moon mission arise, given the seemingly out-of-place
shot of Bond stumbling across a sound stage in Hughes’ facility, where
actors in astronaut suits are staging a phony lunar landing. Is Fleming
implying that the moon mission itself was a psychological operation?
Speculation is welcomed here, but the real message of Diamonds centers around exotic weaponry along directed energy lines. The same theme re-emerges in the 1974 film adaptation of Fleming’s The Man with the Golden Gun, where alchemy and techne
combine to reveal the Pentagon’s darkest future tech. Given that Jackie
married Aristotle Onassis just five years after JFK was gone, could
this signify a mafia-mandated marriage tradition? Perhaps Fleming knew the answer about this and the real SPECTRE.
theintercept |While perception management
involves denying, or blocking, propaganda, it can also entail advancing
the U.S.’s own narrative. The Defense Department defines perception
management in its official dictionary
as “[a]ctions to convey and/or deny selected information and indicators
to foreign audiences to influence their emotions, motives, and
objective reasoning.” This is the part that has, historically, tended to
raise the public’s skepticism of the Pentagon’s work.
The term “perception management” hearkens back to
the Reagan administration’s attempts to shape the narrative around the
Contras in Nicaragua. The Reagan administration sought to kick what his
Vice President George H.W. Bush would later call the “Vietnam syndrome,”
which it believed was driving American public opposition to support for
the Contras. Ronald Reagan’s CIA director, William Casey, directed
the agency’s leading propaganda specialist to oversee an interagency
effort to portray the Contras — who had been implicated in grisly
atrocities — as noble freedom fighters.
“An elaborate system of inter-agency committees was eventually formed
and charged with the task of working closely with private groups and
individuals involved in fundraising, lobbying campaigns and
propagandistic activities aimed at influencing public opinion and
governmental action,” an unpublished draft chapter of Congress’s
investigation into Iran-Contra states. (Democrats dropped the chapter in
order to get several Republicans to sign the report.)
The Smith-Mundt Act, passed in 1948 in the wake of the Second World
War, prohibits the the State Department from disseminating “public
diplomacy” — i.e., propaganda — domestically, instead requiring that
those materials be targeted at foreign audiences. The Defense Department
considered itself bound by this requirement as well.
After the invasion of Iraq, the Pentagon triggered backlash after
U.S. propaganda was disseminated in the U.S. In 2004, the military signaled that it had begun its siege on Fallujah. Just hours later, CNN discovered that this was not true.
But in 2012, the law was amended to allow propaganda to be circulated
domestically, under the bipartisan Smith-Mundt Modernization Act,
introduced by Reps. Adam Smith, D-Wash., and Mac Thornberry, R-Texas,
which was later rolled into the National Defense Authorization Act.
“Proponents of amending these two sections argue that the ban on
domestic dissemination of public diplomacy information is impractical
given the global reach of modern communications, especially the
Internet, and that it unnecessarily prevents valid U.S. government
communications with foreign publics due to U.S. officials’ fear of
violating the ban,” a congressional research service report said
at the time of the proposed amendments. “Critics of lifting the ban
state that it may open the door to more aggressive U.S. government
activities to persuade U.S. citizens to support government policies, and
might also divert the focus of State Department and the BBG
[Broadcasting Board of Governors] communications from foreign publics,
reducing their effectiveness.”
The Obama administration subsequently approved a highly classified
covert action finding designed to counter foreign malign influence
activities, a finding renewed and updated by the Biden administration,
as The Intercept has reported.
The IPMO memo produced for the academic institution hints at its role
in such propagandistic efforts now. “Among other things, the IPMO is
tasked with the development of broad thematic messaging guidance and
specific strategies for the execution of DoD activities designed to
influence foreign defense-related decision-makers to behave in a manner
beneficial to U.S. interests,” the memo states.
As the global war on terror
draws to a close, the Pentagon has turned its attention to so-called
great power adversaries like Russia and China. Following Russia’s
meddling in the 2016 election, which in part involved state-backed
efforts to disseminate falsehoods on social media, offices tasked with
combating disinformation started springing up all over the U.S.
government, as The Intercept has reported.
The director of national intelligence last year established a new
center to oversee all the various efforts, including the Department of
Homeland Security’s Countering Foreign Influence Task Force and the
FBI’s Foreign Influence Task Force.
The Pentagon’s IPMO differs from the others in one key respect:
secrecy. Whereas most of the Department of Homeland Security’s
counter-disinformation efforts are unclassified in nature — as one
former DHS contractor not authorized to speak publicly explained to The
Intercept — the IPMO involves a great deal of highly classified work.
That the office’s work goes beyond simple messaging into the rarefied
world of intelligence is clear from its location within the Pentagon
hierarchy. “The Influence and Perception Management Office will serve as
the senior advisor to the USD(I&S) [Undersecretary of Defense for
Intelligence and Security] for strategic operational influence and
perception management (reveal and conceal) matters,” the budget notes.
When asked about the intelligence community’s counter-disinformation
efforts, Lt. Gen. Scott Berrier, director of the Defense Intelligence
Agency, told Congress this month, “I think DIA’s perspective on this,
senator, is really speed: We want to be able to detect that and it’s
really with our open-source collection capability working with our
combatant command partners where this is happening all over the world —
and then the ability to turn something quickly with them, under the
right authorities, to counter that disinformation, misinformation.”
This set of "Sedge Masters" articles also had nearly the longest write-up of any "PUBLIC DOMAIN" story in the177 page documentthat leaked last week,
with five separate notes sections added to it. That 177 page document
may have been associated with the Congressional hearings. Clipping of relevant portion of that document is available here.
Some notable claims from the first Sedge Masters article:
Military
in Europe was experiencing UAP sightings pre-World War II. The Nazis
allegedly recovered a saucer-like craft of indeterminant origin in the
days immediately preceding Germany's invasion of Poland. (aligns with some of the Europe/Italy claims)
The
program "has always been included within the classified mission
statements of the various agencies and military branches comprising the
intelligence community since before the formation of the Agency in
1947."
Roswell
was a UAP crash-recovery involving two distinct UAP. One was a "deltoid
wing lifting body." The other craft had completely disintegrated either
before or upon impact.
Working theories for the craft at the time were: (1) secret Soviet craft, (2) craft from "some other dimension", or (3) craft from our own future.
"It
soon became clear that these craft were from some planet or solar
system other than our own, as they were occupied by two kinds of beings
which clearly were not of earthly origin."
There
were 5 occupants of the deltoid craft, all of whom were largely intact.
Two occupants were alive initially, one died shortly after. The other
survived thirty days. All efforts to communicate were inconclusive,
although it appeared to understand it was being held in captivity by
intelligent being like itself. The three other occupants were dead upon
arrival. Their appearance fits with "recently published 'investigative'
books" ("deltoid craft": greys?)
The occupants of the second craft were longer in dimension than the ones of the deltoid craft, and all were dead when found. Animals that had eaten their corpses had also died. (fits with Varginha infection death?) It appeared the second group of aliens could not survive if exposed to Earth's atmosphere.
"The
autopsy of the deltoid craft's occupants showed they were of very light
build, clearly not from this planet. The simplicity of their brain
structures and non-communication in the face of stalwart efforts by
researchers led investigators as the time to conclude that they were not
the original designers and builder's of the craft involved in the
incident. Rather, it seemed they were "biological robots,"
designed and bred for the purpose of undertaking such a dangerous
missions as flying through the atmosphere of an alien world. The
survivor finally died when its body accumulated toxic waste products
from its metabolism. There were no apparent excretory system or sexual
organs." (fits with some of the4chan "leaker" narrative, as well as ther/aliensEBO narrative)
Those in control of the information decided who to share it with, including sometimes choosing not to share it with certain Presidents, including Nixon and Ford. Jimmy Carter was kept well informed. (fits with what Ross Coulthart has claimed about some Presidents not being briefed)
"The
popular literature bandies about the name of 'Majestic 12' or 'MJ-12'
for this special, secret task force formed by the President. Other names
by which it has been identified in the public mind through
disinformation programs are "Project Saucer" or "Aquarius." While it is
possible that any one or more of these was the name of the group at one
time, for most of it's existence the code name for the group and the
extensive program which it spawned has been and still is "Zodiac," with
each of its operational subdivisions known by the name of a different
zodiacal sign, including Acquarius."
As
of the early 1980s, the Agency (CIA) exercised complete control over
ZODIAC, with cooperation of the rest of the intelligence community and
military branches, particularly the Air Force and the Navy. (notably,
these two branches of the military seem to still be the most involved
in disclosure [Navy] and lack thereof [Air Force] today)
From 1947-1980s, ZODIAC recovered eleven other alien craft
in various states of disrepair, from a diminutive single-seat flying
wing to a rather large craft that had to be trucked into Wright
Patterson by dead of night. (fits with the twelve craft claim from Grusch)
Some
craft were turned over to our government by friendly powers, most
notably Denmark, which allowed the U.S. to retrieve a rather large disk
that had submerged off the Danish coast.
Occasionally, a live craft occupant was recovered as well (fits with Grusch claims)
There seem to be at least four types of occupants,
the two described previously, as well as "humanoids that appear to be
almost human and Nordic in appearance," and "small, strong, hairy ones."
It is possible that one or more of these type
s represent only a sub-type of the others. (fits with Grusch claims of multiple-NHIs)
There
is no evidence of telepathic communication abilities of these
creatures. There is some type of empathetic manipulation and thought
control ability.
The
crash-recovery team was composed of 67 well-trained men, as of the late
60s. By the late 70s they had "perfected the tasks of completely and
thoroughly documenting all actions and cleaning up any debris remaining
after these incidents."
Some notable claims from the second Sedge Masters article:
During
one one of the crash-retrievals, a "big ship" "20 times larger than the
one they were recovering" showed up overhead, hovered above, and tried
to scare the retrieval team away from the wreck. They apparently did not
want them recovering that wreck.
The
crash retrieval team claims they could "feel their hostility" even
though it was "not telepathy." They describe it as "empathy."
The big ship eventually flew away on its own, and the crash retrieval team proceeded with their recovery.
Some notable claims from the third Sedge Masters article:
The crash retrieval program appears to be headquartered at Wright Patterson AFB
"There
are UFOs... the government was recovering them, had been doing so for
decades, and that there was a secret network within the government,
Zodiac, that seemed to be able to skirt the chain of command with
impunity, spend money earmarked for other projects, and generally do
whatever it damn well pleased, all in the name of UFOs and their
importance to national security" (fits Grusch claims)
The government was tapping the phones of UFO organizations to source leaks/research.
Mentions
an "underwater submerged object" off the coast of Palos Verdes, near
Catalina island, where the USO had become a UFO and proceeded to fly
over their heads (fits with the "water" connection which has frequently been coming up now, as well as the trans-medium claims from Grusch)
"Trust me on this Sedge. They are not ours. Indeed, they are not anyone else's. They are something of a mystery, really."
"They
also told him that humankind is the product of millions of years of
scientific experimentation." (note this is a claim made by two men who
may have been on drugs)
Wright
Patterson has a database of over 2,000,000 reports starting in 1945 of
UAP related sightings from the public. Many involve small glowing balls
of various colors. They believed the balls are some sort of scanning
device.
Masters
claims he was driven out to a full craft in a hangar at WPAFB. It had a
small cockpit with a seamless clear canopy that would fit "a seven year
old." It was allegedly a recovered craft from 1972. A single-seater
flying wing craft, similar to the protype developed by the Germans and
US during WWII. Just a wing, no tail, no fuselage, no props, no jets, no
ailerons.
"For
all we know, that little guy was bred just to deliver this little plane
to us. The way it's scaled down, some of the engineers have taken to
calling it 'the Scooter.'" They speculate the intent of the craft is
purely for one creature to come down to gather samples, but they are not
sure. They claim they don't even know how to turn it off, and only
accidentally turned it on in the first place.
Masters
was then driven to another hanger, with a 50 foot wide, and 23 foot
tall "ovoid disc." He was told it was alien. This allegedly was the
Denmark craft, where it had allegedly sunk in relatively shallow water.
The Danish government cooperated with US, getting the thing out and to
WPAFB was difficult. They had to 'truck it through the city on a lowboy
in the dead of night, covered with a tarp and flanked by plenty of
security.' The hull was smooth and cool to the touch, like a sculpture
or porcelain."
A Foundation of Joy
-
Two years and I've lost count of how many times my eye has been operated
on, either beating the fuck out of the tumor, or reattaching that slippery
eel ...
April Three
-
4/3
43
When 1 = A and 26 = Z
March = 43
What day?
4 to the power of 3 is 64
64th day is March 5
My birthday
March also has 5 letters.
4 x 3 = 12
...
Return of the Magi
-
Lately, the Holy Spirit is in the air. Emotional energy is swirling out of
the earth.I can feel it bubbling up, effervescing and evaporating around
us, s...
New Travels
-
Haven’t published on the Blog in quite a while. I at least part have been
immersed in the area of writing books. My focus is on Science Fiction an
Historic...
Covid-19 Preys Upon The Elderly And The Obese
-
sciencemag | This spring, after days of flulike symptoms and fever, a man
arrived at the emergency room at the University of Vermont Medical Center.
He ...