nakedcapitalism | Yves here. Reader Christopher J sent a contribution from Down Under,
with a long note about his treatment for his first major medical
treatment. I thought I would run it as a long-form example of how health
care works in other advanced economies. Admittedly, my personal data
points are stale, but when I was in Sydney (2002-2004), the caliber of
health care was on a par with the US, and even with my paying out of
pocket, the charges were about a third of what they would have been in
the US. A couple I knew who had the option of the wife giving childbirth
in New York City or Sydney chose Sydney because they deemed the care to
be better.
One of the big things that allows for America’s health care looting
to go well beyond what ought to have been its sell by date is our
provincialism.
You can read about the Australian scheme here;
the short version is citizens and permanent residents pay 2% of their
annual income over a threshold for Medicare; they can then either buy
private insurance or pay a surcharge for the balance of their coverage.
Christopher J lives in Cairns, which is a remote city of 150,000 near the Great Barrier Reef.
By Christopher J
I follow your blog most days and have been a part time commenter for
well over 10 years now, since I worked for the Bureau of Transport
Economics in Canberra.
Here is a story about my first medical emergency. I was born in the
UK in 1961 and now live in Cairns after working in the public sector for
30 plus years in the finance and treasury sectors. I currently work for
self as handyman and have a partner who also works.
Last September 2018, I gave up smoking cigarettes due to the expense.
Heavily taxed to ‘discourage use’, a 20 pack of Marlboros now costs
around A$30 – $20 US. And, I reckon my habit was costing around $750 a
month, or the cost of an annual river cruise in Europe! I’d given up
several times for months or even years, but this was the first time I’d
given up arising from anger at how the Federal Government was tackling
the problem with a huge tax on, mostly, working people.
After that first month, I withdrew the money I’d saved in cash and
bought myself a flash wallet to put it in. Smug I was at the pub around
my smoking friends. I found huge improvements in my health. For many
years sleeping on my side led to my arms going to sleep as my
circulation was constricted by all that smoke residue. After a month or
so of not smoking, my blood circulation improved and I found I could
sleep again on my side. I told partner we were going to extend all our
run circuits by about 800 m and we started to hike up Mount Whitfield,
and jog down, about an 8km round trip with an up and down of around
350m, with the trail along the ridge line. I was feeling very fit for my
age and was feeling generally positive about my health and well being.
At the end of May, or so, and out of the blue, I found a lump as I
was sitting on the bed one morning. This was a Monday about 4 months
ago. At the top of my right thigh and groiu area was a lump, not
painful, about the size of a small egg.’
counterpunch | Something very unusual happened on Thursday, Oct. 17. The New York
Times suddenly ran an article on its opinion page explaining how to cut
$300 billion from the $1-trillion military budget — enough, the article
explained, to fund Bernie Sanders’ proposed program for an expanded
Medicare program to cover all Americans without raising a dime in new
taxes.
The article, written by Lindsay Koshgarian, director of the Institute
for Policy Studies’ National Priorities Project, explained that by
shifting the US diplomatic and military strategy from one of
confrontation, endless wars, expansive overseas basing, and
unilateralism to one of diplomacy, a pull-back from foreign bases and
global deployments, with a concomitant reduction in the nation’s 2.4
million-person military could be accomplished with no threat to US
national security.
Koshgarian’s opinion article actually listed the cuts that could be made, attaching a dollar value to each one. Examples were:
* End the practice of supplemental appropriations for war funding,
much of which is actually used for more spending on other unintended
military programs and which have only led to unending wars that have
done nothing to make the US safer, for example in Iraq and Afghanistan.
Savings: $66 billion per year.
* End funding for other nations’ militaries. Savings $14 billion a year.
* Close foreign bases (Almost one-third of all uniformed US military
personnel serve abroad, most of them in non-crisis-zone locations or
combat zones). Savings: $90 billion
businessinmexico | If you’ve ever considered a move across the southern border, you may
wonder what healthcare in Mexico is like for expats. While in many ways,
the Mexican system is much friendlier than the U.S. healthcare system —
so much so that Americans cross the border to get healthcare — there
are still a lot of things you need to know.
What kind of healthcare system does Mexico have? Can you get
insurance there as a resident, or while doing business in Mexico? What
is the IMSS, or Seguro Popular, and how do those apply to you
as a non-citizen? When it comes to medical care, south of the border,
understanding your options is essential.
When many Americans think of Mexico, they think of a poverty-stricken
country that people are trying to escape. While that might be true in
some cases, primarily because of corruption, Mexico is a cosmopolitan
21st-century country and its healthcare system reflects that.
There are thousands of healthcare facilities throughout the country,
about one-third of which belong to the taxpayers. Most healthcare
providers in Mexico received at least part of their education in the
United States, Canada or Europe. Finding an English speaking doctor
should not be a problem.
kctv5 | As the officer in charge of COMBAT, Jackson County’s Drug Trafficking
Task Force Dan Cumming deals with a lot of dangerous people.
“About
100% of what we recover, if you follow it back far enough up the drug
train so to speak, comes from Mexico and is cartel related,” Cummings
said.
Just last week, COMBAT worked a case at the request of Independence police.
A tip led them to a Kansas City, Missouri street where a search warrant led to the seizure of tires filled with meth.
“My guess is that’s the way it was shipped from Mexico to Kansas City,” Cummings said.
Cartels get creative when smuggling drugs in customs and border protection has a few recent examples.
Fentanyl in a vehicle transmission, heroine in a gas tank, marijuana inside a car door and cocaine in clay figurines.
Cummings says he’s seeing more cartel related drug busts in Kansas City now than he has in his 35 plus years in law enforcement.
reuters | The mug shot-style photo of Ovidio Guzman that appeared as he was
apprehended oozed defiance. Chin jutting out, eyes trained on the
camera, the handsome youth bore a strong resemblance to his infamous
father, jailed drug lord Joaquin “El Chapo” Guzman.
He had reason to be cocksure. In response to his capture in an
upscale neighborhood, hundreds of heavily-armed Sinaloa Cartel henchmen,
guns blazing, were pouring into Culiacan, briefly taking the modern
city of about a million people near Mexico’s Pacific coast hostage.
Within hours they had pried him loose from authorities.
It
was like nothing Mexico had seen before, a military-style operation
that outfoxed and outnumbered security forces, leaving the city shocked
and smoldering. The show of strength dashed hopes the cartel was
seriously weakened by the life sentence the elder Guzman received in the
United States this year.
Not only were the new generation of
Guzmans, collectively known as Los Chapitos, keeping alive their
family’s near-mythical outlaw reputation, they were doing it with a
brazenness akin to open warfare.
“We’re facing a new generation
of organized crime that doesn’t respect civilians,” Cristobal Castaneda,
head of Sinaloa state security, told Reuters after the attacks.
Four
surviving sons of El Chapo were already regulars in Culiacan’s
nightclubs and restaurants, despite U.S. indictments against them,
before last Thursday’s dramatic act of armed insurrection.
NEW: “We got a QUEER running for President... the white man has very few rights.” Watch @SevierCounty Commissioner Warren Hurst’s homophobic, bigoted outburst Monday, telling folks to “wake up”. Mayor’s office: 865-453-6136 Hurst: 865-453-8513 WVLT: https://t.co/GFwJLqehUfpic.twitter.com/bfXrAACfPh
sicsempertyrannis | Any fair reporter with half a brain would see these events as
pointing to a conspiracy. But not the liars at the New York Times. But
the Times does tip us off to the upcoming mad scramble for life boats.
It will it the FBI and DOJ against the DNI, the CIA and NSA. According
to the Times:
It is not clear how many people Mr.
Durham’s team has interviewed outside of the F.B.I. His investigators
have questioned officials in the Office of the Director of National
Intelligence but apparently have yet to interview C.I.A. personnel,
people familiar with the review said. Mr. Durham would probably want to
speak with Gina Haspel, the agency’s director, who ran its London
station when the Australians passed along the explosive information
about Russia’s offer of political dirt.
There is no abiding affection between the FBI and the CIA. They mix
like oil and water. In theory the FBI only traffics in "evidence." The
CIA deals primarily with well-sourced rumors. But the CIA will argue
they were offering their best judgement, not a factual conclusion.
Brennan and Clapper will insist they were not in a position to determine
the "truth" of what they were reporting. It is "intel" not evidence.
The Horowitz report will not deal with the CIA and NSA directly.
Horowitz can only point out that the FBI folks insisted that they were
relying on the intel community and had no reason not to trust them. This
is likely to get ugly and do not be surprised to see the intel folks
try to throw the FBI under the bus and vice versa. Grab the popcorn.
sicsempertyrannis | U.S. officials had been
concerned that Russian sources could be at risk of exposure as early as
the fall of 2016, when the Obama administration first confirmed that
Russia had stolen and publicly disclosed emails from the Democratic
National Committee and the account of Hillary Clinton’s campaign
chairman, John Podesta.
In October 2016, the
Department of Homeland Security and the Office of the Director of
National Intelligence said in a joint statement that intelligence
agencies were “confident that the Russian Government directed” the
hacking campaign. . . .
In January 2017, the Obama administration
published a detailed assessment that unambiguously laid the blame on
the Kremlin, concluding that “Putin ordered an influence campaign” and
that Russia’s goal was to undermine faith in the U.S. democratic process
and harm Clinton’s chances of winning.
“That’s a pretty remarkable intelligence
community product — much more specific than what you normally see,” one
U.S. official said. “It’s very expected that potential U.S. intelligence
assets in Russia would be under a higher level of scrutiny by their own
intelligence services.”
Sounds official. But there is no actual forensic or documentary
evidence (by that I mean actual corroborating intelligence reports) to
back up these claims by our oxymoronically christened intelligence
community.
Vladimir Putin ordered the hack? Where is the report? It is either in
a piece of intercepted electronics communication and/or in a report
derived from information provided by Mr. Smolenkov. Where is it? Why has
that not been shared in public? Don't have to worry about exposing the
source now. He is already in the open. What did he report? Answer--no
direct evidence.
Then there is the lie that the Russians hacked the DNC. They did not.
Bill Binney, a former Technical Director of the NSA, and I have written
on this subject previously (see here)
and there is no truth to this claim. Let me put it simply--if the DNC
had been hacked by the Russians using spearphising (this is claimed in
the Robert Mueller report) then the NSA would have collected those
messages and would be able to show they were transferred to the
Russians. That did not happen.
This kind of chaotic leaking about an old intel op is symptomatic of
panic. CIA is already officially denying key parts of the story. My
money is on John Brennan and Jim Clapper as the likely impetus for these
reports. They are hoping to paint Trump as a national security threat
and distract from the upcoming revelations from the DOJ Inspector
General report on the FISA warrants and, more threatening, the decisions
that Prosecutor John Durham will take in deciding to indict those who
attempted to launch a coup against Donald Trump, a legitimately elected
President of the United States.
asiatimes | Trump’s real liability isn’t impeachment. It’s China and the economy.
What the Trump administration has been doing so far, vis-à-vis China,
is an own goal — ein Eigentor [“an owner”].
Why is it an eigentor?
Because the effect of the tariffs on the US economy is at least as
bad as the effect of the tariffs on the Chinese economy. American export
orders are collapsing. We have the weakest industrial reading since
June of 2009. We are in a manufacturing recession, according to the
Federal Reserve. Factory output is contracting. Trump won in 2016 by
carrying key manufacturing states like Pennsylvania,
Ohio, Michigan, and
Wisconsin. This blunder could lose him the election. This is much more
dangerous than the impeachment masquerade. China’s also suffering, but
appears to be suffering less.
And the big difference is Xi Jinping
[China’s president] doesn’t have a presidential election in 2020 and
Trump does.
In fact, President Xi will never face an election. He is elected for life.
That is true. But all that can change if he fails to succeed.
You have compared the situation that the US is facing toward China to the siege and conquest of Baghdad by the Mongols in 1258.
The Mongols, by themselves, did not have the capability to penetrate
the twelve-foot-thick walls of the city of Baghdad. But they hired a
thousand Chinese siege engineers. Within three weeks, the Chinese
mercenaries breached the walls, at which point the Mongol horsemen went
in and killed the entire population of Baghdad.
Who are today’s Chinese siege engineers who are breaching the American fortress?
Huawei very much is the spearhead, because in the Chinese model of
economic expansion and the development of world economic power,
broadband is the opener to everything else.
It’s a company with a lot of very talented people. Ten years ago – if
you asked people, “What Chinese products do you buy?” – you wouldn’t
mention a single brand name. But everyone now knows Huawei. They produce
the world’s best smartphones. They certainly dominate 5G internet. But
Huawei is not a Chinese company. It is an imperial company.
The Chinese empire is doing better than us because it’s absorbed the talent of a very large number of others.
oftwominds | If you're truly interested in finding solutions to humanity's pressing problems, then start helping us pry open the Overton Window.
The Overton Window describes the spectrum of concepts, policies and approaches that can be publicly discussed without being ridiculed or marginalized as "too radical," "unworkable," "crazy," etc. The narrower the Overton Window, the greater the impoverishment of public dialog and the fewer the solutions available.
Those holding power in a socio-economic-political system that's unraveling devote their remaining energy to closing the Overton Window so that only "approved" narratives and policies that support the status quo are "allowed" into the public sphere.
Everything outside this narrow band of status-quo-supportive narratives is immediately disparaged as "fake news," "Kremlin talking points," or other highly charged accusations designed to close the Overton Window--a process Noam Chomsky and Edward Herman called manufacturing consent: if no "outside" ideas are allowed, people accept the status quo as "all there is and all there can possibly be."
This narrow Overton Window benefits those in power who are "legally looting" the system.
There is another source of a narrow Overton Window: the cultural, social and political elites have no new ideas and so they cling to doing more of what's failed, relying on the past successes of now-failing strategies to cement their power.
Michael Grant described how this failure of imagination and devotion to the past leads inevitably to decline and collapse in his excellent account The Fall of the Roman Empire, a short book I have been recommending since 2009:
NYTimes | Speaker Nancy Pelosi has traveled to
Jordan to meet with the Jordanian king for “vital” discussions about the
Turkish incursion into Syria and other regional challenges, amid uncertainty about whether an American-brokered cease-fire with Turkey in northern Syria was holding.
The
visit by senior United States officials came as sporadic clashes
continued on Sunday morning along the Turkish-Syrian border, where,
according to the Turkish Defense Ministry, a Turkish soldier was killed
by Kurdish fighters in the Syrian border town of Tel Abyad.
Confusion and continued shelling have marred the cease-fire deal
announced by Vice President Mike Pence last week, with both Turkey and
Kurdish leaders accusing each other of violating the truce.
Ms.
Pelosi, a California Democrat, led a nine-member bipartisan
congressional delegation to Jordan that included Representatives Adam
Schiff, Democrat of California; Eliot L. Engel, Democrat of New York;
and Mac Thornberry, Republican of Texas. The group met with King
Abdullah II of Jordan on Saturday evening.
tomluongo | Tulsi Gabbard has stones. She has the kind of stones born of a life dedicated to the cause of serving others.
She is the direct opposite of Hillary Clinton, for whom all causes serve herself and her enormous narcissism and pathology.
So seeing Gabbard go directly after Hillary Clinton after her debate
performance the other evening where she explicitly called out both the New York Times and CNN (the hosts of the debate) for the hit jobs on her puts to rest any idea she’s someone else’s stalking horse.
Great! Thank you @HillaryClinton. You, the queen of warmongers, embodiment of corruption, and personification of the rot that has sickened the Democratic Party for so long, have finally come out from behind the curtain. From the day I announced my candidacy, there has been a ...
Tulsi Gabbard calls The New York Times and CNN — the hosts of the debate — "completely despicable" for alleging she is a Russian asset and Assad apologist. pic.twitter.com/0pzpA4nvRo
But perhaps the highlight was her directly calling out the very
sponsors of the debate, CNN and the New York Times, for their
“despicable” and baseless attacks.
“Just two days ago, the New York Times put out an article saying that
I’m a Russian asset and an Assad apologist and all these different
smears. This morning, a CNN commentator said on national television that I’m an asset of Russia. Completely despicable,” she said.
The CNN charge specifically referenced comments made by Bakari Sellers on New Day on
the morning of the debate. He said Gabbard is the “antithesis” of what
the Democratic Party and the other candidates stand for, adding, “There is no question that Tulsi Gabbard, of all the 12, is a puppet for the Russian government.”
ineteconomics | Under the shadow of a future darkened by climate crises, political
instability, inequality, and super-human machines, how to best proceed?
For some, the answer is more technology and scientific advancement; for
others, better policies and political arrangements. Or some combination
of these.
To get at that something, Lent traces a “cognitive history” of the
human species in a book delivering big, sweeping ideas and a
discipline-hopping approach drawing from neuroscience, archaeology,
linguistics, and systems theory, the study of complex living systems.
Lent argues that how we view the world arises out of language,
specifically core metaphors that shape our values and culture, which in
turn mold history in a reciprocal feedback loop. Cultural templates are
often long lasting, but can also shift dramatically, sometimes in a
generation or two. The process of cultural evolution, Lent observes,
determines how well humans fare as much as the genes we inherit (there’s
a feedback loop between culture and genes, too).
As Lent sees it, you and I are in the midst one of history’s great
transitions — a process which could lead to conditions far less
hospitable for most, or even a total collapse of global civilization. To
avoid these dire fates, we can train our brains to adopt alternative
metaphors that allow us to live less destructively.
So which metaphors are causing the trouble? For one, Lent faults a
tendency to conceive a dualistic universe of binary categories, like
mind and matter, reason and emotion, self and other. This framework, as
the postmoderns observed, drives us to favor one category over the other
and to build societies based on hierarchy and separation.
The pattern is not universal: Lent presents evidence that early
hunter-gatherers emphasized connectivity rather than separation, a
mindset that engendered a more egalitarian social structure.
(Unfortunately, they also lived by a metaphor of nature as an endlessly
giving parent, resulting in problems like overhunting, which illustrates
that even seemingly harmless metaphors can eventually lead to
catastrophe).
bbc | Depending on what language you speak, your eye perceives colours – and the world – differently than someone else. The human eye can physically perceive millions of colours. But we don’t all recognise these colours in the same way.
Some people can’t see differences in colours – so called colour blindness – due to a defect or absence of the cells in the retina that are sensitive to high levels of light: the cones. But the distribution and density of these cells also varies across people with ‘normal vision’, causing us all to experience the same colour in slightly different ways.
Besides our individual biological make up, colour perception is less about seeing what is actually out there and more about how our brain interprets colours to create something meaningful. The perception of colour mainly occurs inside our heads and so is subjective – and prone to personal experience.
Take for instance people with synaesthesia,
who are able to experience the perception of colour with letters and
numbers. Synaesthesia is often described as a joining of the senses –
where a person can see sounds or hear colours. But the colours they hear
also differ from case to case.
Another example is the classic Adelson’s checker-shadow illusion. Here, although two marked squares are exactly the same colour, our brains don’t perceive them this way.
Since
the day we were born we have learnt to categorise objects, colours,
emotions, and pretty much everything meaningful using language. And
although our eyes can perceive thousands of colours, the way we
communicate about colour – and the way we use colour in our everyday
lives – means we have to carve this huge variety up into identifiable,
meaningful categories.
Painters and fashion experts, for example, use colour terminology to
refer to and discriminate hues and shades that to all intents and
purposes may all be described with one term by a non-expert.
wikipedia |Preference falsification is the act of communicating a preference
that differs from one's true preference. Individuals frequently convey,
especially to researchers or pollsters, preferences that differ from
what they genuinely want, often because they believe the conveyed
preference is more socially acceptable than their actual preference. The
idea of preference falsification was put forth by the social scientist Timur Kuran in his book Private Truth, Public Lies
as part of his theory of how people's stated preferences are responsive
to social influences. It laid the foundation for his theory of why
unanticipated revolutions can occur. It is related to ideas of social proof as well as choice blindness.
wikipedia |Dean Karnazes (English: /kɑːrˈnɛˈzɪs/car-NEH-zis; born Constantine Karnazes; August 23, 1962), is an Americanultramarathon runner, and author of Ultramarathon Man: Confessions of an All-Night Runner, which details ultra endurance running for the general public.[3][4]
wired | On Saturday morning in Vienna, Austria, Eliud Kipchoge, the world's finest marathoner, became the first person in history to run 26.2 miles in under two hours.
His time of 1:59:40 required him to maintain an average pace of just
under 4:35 per mile. That is, to put it mildly, soul-searing speed. Even
a supremely fit person would struggle to run at so aggressive a clip
for more than five or six minutes in a row. On Saturday, Kipchoge held
it for just shy of 120.
But
Kipchoge's performance will not be recognized as an official world
record. The event was not an open competition; it was held for Kipchoge
and Kipchoge alone. What's more, a rotating cast of pacers shielded him
from wind throughout the run, and a bicycle-riding support team was on
hand at all times to deliver him water and fuel. It was not so much a
race, in other words, as an exhibition event designed for speed. A
one-man, all-or-nothing time trial.
healthline | A no-carb diet is a way of eating that eliminates digestible carbs as much as possible.
Carbs
are your body’s primary source of energy. They’re found in grains,
beans, legumes, fruits, vegetables, milk, yogurt, pasta, bread, and
baked goods.
Therefore, someone on a no-carb diet must avoid most
of these foods and instead eat foods that contain primarily protein or
fat, such as meats, fish, eggs, cheese, oils, and butter.
There is no strict rubric for a no-carb diet. Some people who follow it eat nuts and seeds, non-starchy vegetables, and high-fat fruits like avocado and coconut.
Even
though these foods have some carbs, they’re high in fiber. Therefore,
they have only a minuscule number of digestible or net carbs, which is
calculated by subtracting the amount of fiber from the total number of
carbs (1).
A no-carb diet resembles a ketogenic diet,
which limits your carb intake to fewer than 30 grams per day and
encourages you to get 70% or more of your daily calories from fat (2Trusted Source).
Depending on what you choose to eat, a no-carb diet can be more restrictive than keto.
technologyreview |My bitterness peaked midway through day four
of the “Fast-Mimicking Diet,” when a parent arrived at my daughter’s
softball game with doughnuts. As little girls and fellow coaches crowded
around the box, I stood apart, glumly sipping out of my special water
bottle with its “proprietary” blend of nutrients.
For breakfast, I’d consumed a nut bar the size of a small cracker and a couple of vitamins. Lunch was five olives from Seville.
Frankly, I’d begun to resent Valter Longo, the inventor of Prolon,
the five-day, $250 fad diet causing my misery. True, the Italian-born
biochemist had seemed perfectly nice when I’d reached him at his office
at the University of Southern California’s Longevity
Institute a few days before to speak with him about the science behind
the diet and what it might do for my general health and longevity. He
had patiently explained how the diet would temporarily shift my body
into a starvation state that would prompt my cells to consume years of
accumulated cellular garbage before unleashing a surge of restorative
regeneration. Getting rid of garbage had sounded like just what I
needed. But now I blamed him for my predicament. I wanted a doughnut.
My
Prolon “meal kit” had arrived in a white cardboard container a little
bigger than a shoebox. Inside I’d found a meal program card spelling out
the menu, a large empty water bottle emblazoned with the word “Prolon,”
and five smaller cardboard boxes, each labeled with a corresponding
day. I opened the box for day one, billed as a higher-calorie
“transition day,” and was pleasantly surprised. It didn’t look so bad.
I’d be sampling many of the diet’s highlights: a small packet of kale
crackers, powdered tomato soup blend, algae oil supplements, a bag of
olives, herbal tea, and not one but two nut-based bars (albeit
distressingly small).
When
I opened up day two, however, I began to get a better sense of what I
was in for. One of the puny nut bars had been replaced by a
glycerin-based “energy” drink, which I was instructed to add water to
and sip on throughout the day. There was more herbal tea—hibiscus, mint,
and lemon (I don’t even like herbal tea)—plus a couple more
powdered-soup packs and two tiny packets of olives. Where was the rest of it?
technologyreview |Izpisúa Belmonte believes epigenetic
reprogramming may prove to be an “elixir of life” that will extend human
life span significantly. Life expectancy has increased more than
twofold in the developed world over the past two centuries. Thanks to
childhood vaccines, seat belts, and so on, more people than ever reach
natural old age. But there is a limit to how long anyone lives, which
Izpisúa Belmonte says is because our bodies wear down through inevitable
decay and deterioration. “Aging,” he writes, “is nothing other than
molecular aberrations that occur at the cellular level.” It is, he says,
a war with entropy that no individual has ever won.
But each generation
brings new possibilities, as the epigenome gets reset during
reproduction when a new embryo is formed. Cloning takes advantage of
reprogramming, too: a calf cloned from an adult bull contains the same
DNA as the parent, just refreshed. In both cases, the offspring is born
without the accumulated “aberrations” that Izpisúa Belmonte refers to.
What
Izpisúa Belmonte is proposing is to go one step better still, and
reverse aging-related aberrations without having to create a new
individual. Among these are changes to our epigenetic marks—chemical
groups called histones and methylation marks, which wrap around a cell’s
DNA and function as on/off switches for genes. The accumulation of
these changes causes the cells to function less efficiently as we get
older, and some scientists, Izpisúa Belmonte included, think they could
be part of why we age in the first place. If so, then reversing these
epigenetic changes through reprogramming may enable us to turn back
aging itself.
Izpisúa Belmonte cautions
that epigenetic tweaks won’t “make you live forever,” but they might
delay your expiration date. As he sees it, there is no reason to think
we cannot extend human life span by another 30 to 50 years, at least. “I
think the kid that will be living to 130 is already with us,” Izpisúa
Belmonte says. “He has already been born. I’m convinced.”
Forbes | NASA is preparing to explore a world made of metal. Confirming that the
exciting Arizona State University School of Earth and Space
Exploration-led Psyche mission
is now entering the build phase, NASA’s probe is now set to visit a
mysterious asteroid between the orbits of Mars and Jupiter. It could be
nothing less than the exposed core of a dead planet, with some
suggesting that it could be worth a staggering $10,000 quadrillion.
What is asteroid Psyche?
While most asteroids are rocky or icy bodies, Psyche is thought to be
a stripped planetary core, a very rare object in the solar system.
While NASA missions like InSight drill into Mars
to discover the origins of planets, Psyche offers an opportunity to
inspect and study a planetary core up close. It appears to be the
exposed iron-nickel core (just like Earth’s) of a proto-planet, a small
world that formed early in the solar system's history, but never reached
planetary size—much like Vesta and Ceres, which NASA's Dawn spacecraft explored.
Could asteroid Psyche be the heart of an early planet as big as Mars
that lost its rocky outer layers? Was it involved in violent collisions?
NASA will help planetary scientists find out, and so tease-out lessons
for how the solar system’s planets likely formed.
energy.gov | NNSA and the National Aeronautics and
Space Administration (NASA) joined forces to address a unique challenge:
developing a power source able to support deep space travel and outlast
existing fuel sources. NNSA came through with the technical expertise required to achieve this goal.
“The
relationship between NNSA and NASA is a ‘win-win’ partnership,” said
Patrick Cahalane, NNSA’s Principal Deputy Associate Administrator for
Safety, Infrastructure and Operations. “NASA gets a prototype
demonstration for a kilowatt-range fission power source, and NNSA gets a
benchmark-quality experiment that provides new nuclear data in support
of our Nuclear Criticality Safety Program.”
The experiment, nicknamed KRUSTY (Kilowatt Reactor Using Stirling TechnologY), was part of NASA’s larger Kilopower project. KRUSTY was designed to test a prototype fission reactor coupled to a Stirling engine. Stirling technology is efficient, doesn’t require significant maintenance, and does not degrade in performance over time.
Researchers
designed and performed initial testing of the KRUSTY reactor design
using a surrogate, or non-fissile, reactor core and resistive heating
elements. Experts from NNSA’s Y-12 National Security Complex manufactured the uranium reactor core, which was delivered to the NCERC in the fall of 2017.
thedrive |The War Zone has been reporting on a set of bizarre patents
assigned to the U.S. Navy that describe radical new technologies that
could absolutely revolutionize the aerospace field, and frankly, the
very way we live our lives. These include high-energy electromagnetic
fields used to create force fields and outlandish new methods of
aerospace propulsion and vehicle design that basically read as UFO-like
technology. You can learn all about these patents, their viability, and
the issues surrounding them in these exclusive features of ours.
Now, the same mysterious Naval Air Warfare Center Aircraft Division
engineer behind those patents has produced another patent—one for a
compact fusion reactor that could pump out absolutely incredible amounts
of power in a small space—maybe even in a craft.
Energy
dominance has become a cornerstone of American military policy as
laboratories seek to develop the ‘Holy Grail’ of power generation:
nuclear fusion. These attempts at developing stable fusion reactors
utilize incredibly powerful magnetic fields in order to contain the
nuclear reactions occurring inside. Creating a stable fusion reaction is
difficult enough, but some laboratories are going even further by
attempting to create compact reactors small enough to fit inside
shipping containers or even possibly vehicles.
While Lockheed Martin’s CFR designs have garnered quite a bit of
media attention and internet buzz in recent years, it appears one of the
Skunk Works' major clients is also hard at work in this field. The U.S.
Navy has filed a potentially revolutionary patent application
for a radical new compact fusion reactor that claims to improve upon
the shortcomings of the Skunk Works CFR, and judging from the identity
of the reactor’s inventor, it's sure to raise eyebrows in the scientific
community.
This latest design is the brainchild of the elusive Salvatore Cezar Pais, the inventor of the Navy’s bizarre and controversial room temperature superconductors, high energy electromagnetic field generators, and sci-fi-sounding propulsion technologies that The War Zone
has previously reported on. The patent for Pais’ “Plasma Compression
Fusion Device” was applied for on March 22, 2018, and was just published
on September 26, 2019.
"The fact that my predecessor had a son who was paid $50,000 a month to
be on a Ukrainian board, at the time that vice president Biden was
leading the Obama Administration’s efforts in Ukraine, I think is worth
looking into." - VP @mike_pence
theintercept |The problem for Democrats is that a review of Hunter Biden’s career
shows clearly that he, along with Joe Biden’s brother James, has been
trading on their family name for decades, cashing in on the implication —
and sometimes the explicit argument — that giving money to a member of
Joe Biden’s family wins the favor of Joe Biden. Democrats have been
loath to give any credibility to the wild rantings of Trump or his
bagman Rudy Giuliani, leaving them to sidestep the question of Hunter
Biden’s ethics or decision-making, and how much responsibility Joe Biden
deserves. Republicans, though, have no such qualms, and have made clear
that smearing the Bidens as corrupt will be central to Trump’s
reelection campaign. The Trump approach is utterly without shame or
irony, with attacks even coming from failson Eric Trump.
Biden has been taking political hits over of the intersection of his
family’s financial dealings and his own political career for some four
decades. Yet he has done nothing publicly to inoculate himself from the
charge that his career is corruptly enriching his family, and now that
is a serious liability. By contrast, one of his opponents in the
presidential primary, Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., went so far as to
refuse to endorse his son Levi Sanders when he ran for Congress, saying
that he does not believe in political dynasties. In defending the
Biden’s nepotistic relationship, Democrats would be forced to argue
that, to be fair, such soft corruption is common among the families of
senior-level politicians. But that’s a risky general-election argument
in a political moment when voters are no longer willing to accept
business-as-usual. For now, Biden’s opponents in the presidential
campaign appear to all hope that somebody else will make the argument,
while congressional Democrats don’t want to do anything to undermine
their impeachment probe. And so Biden skates.
apple | In this episode of the Portal, Eric checks in with his friend Andrew
Yang to discuss the meteoric rise of his candidacy; one that represents
an insurgency against a complacent political process that the media
establishment doggedly tries to maintain. Andrew updates Eric on the
state of his campaign and the status of the ideas the two had discussed
as its foundation when it began. Eric presents Andrew with his new
economic paradigm; moving from an 'is a [worker]' economy to a 'has a
[worker]' economy. The two also discuss neurodiverse families as a
neglected voting block, the still-strong
but squelched-by-the-scientific-establishment STEM community in the US,
and the need to talk fearlessly - and as a xenophile - about immigration
as a wealth transfer gimmick.
foxnews | In recent years, the NBA
has become famously political. During the heyday of the Black Lives
Matter movement, the NBA permitted players to wear slogan-printed
T-shirts in support, and stars like LeBron James, Dwyane Wade and Chris
Paul spoke out loudly on the issue.
The Sacramento Kings actually announced a partnership with the local branch of the movement. And NBA players have had little problem denouncing President Trump, whom James called a "bum."
In 2017, Commissioner Adam Silver
actually tried to blackmail the city of Charlotte, North Carolina, by
pulling the All-Star Game, all in an attempt to restore the so-called
"bathroom bill" for transgender people.
The NBA has reaped the
benefit from its benevolent attitude toward left-leaning social
activism, too. Silver, like former Commissioner David Stern before him,
has been praised ad infinitum by the press, compared favorably to that
alleged corporate hobgoblin Roger Goodell of the NFL.
Silver told
CNN just last year that "part of being an NBA player" is social activism
and a "sense of an obligation, social responsibility, a desire to speak
up directly about issues that are important." Silver stated the league
wants players to "be multi-dimensional people and fully participate as
citizens." He specifically explained that the league had a role in
ensuring that the situation remains "safe" for players afraid of
suffering career blowback.
Then the NBA came up against its own corporate interests.
And the NBA caved.
Late
last week, Houston Rockets general manager Daryl Morey tweeted an
eminently uncontroversial statement: "Fight for freedom, stand with Hong
Kong." That's about as milquetoast a statement about Hong Kong as it's
possible to make. But that didn't matter to the Chinese government,
which immediately stated that it would cut relations with the NBA and
the Rockets in particular.
Speculation quickly ran rampant that
Morey might lose his job. Morey was forced to delete his tweet and walk
it back: "I did not intend my tweet to cause any offense to Rockets fans
and friends of mine in China. I was merely voicing one thought, based
on one interpretation, of one complicated event. I have had a lot of
opportunity since that tweet to hear and consider other perspectives."
James Harden, star of the team, tweeted, "We apologize. We love China.
We love playing there." Silver's NBA put out an apology in Chinese
saying (as translated), "We are extremely disappointed in the
inappropriate comment by the general manager of the Houston Rockets."
theconversation | Research we have just had published sheds new light on this Younger Dryas Impact Hypothesis. We focus on what platinum can tell us about it.
Platinum is known to be concentrated in meteorites, so when a lot of it
is found in one place at one time, it could be a sign of a cosmic
impact. Platinum spikes have been discovered in an ice core in Greenland as well as in areas as far apart as Europe, Western Asia, North America and even Patagonia in South America. These spikes all date to the same period of time.
Until now, there has been no such evidence from Africa. But working
with two colleagues, Professor Louis Scott (University of the Free
State) and Philip Pieterse (University of Johannesburg), I believe there is evidence from South Africa’s Limpopo province that partly supports the controversial Younger Dryas Impact Hypothesis.
The new information has been obtained from Wonderkrater,
an archaeological site with peat deposits at a spring situated outside a
small town to the north of Pretoria. In a sample of peat we have
identified a platinum spike that could at least potentially be related
to dust associated with a meteorite impact somewhere on earth 12,800
years ago.
The platinum spike at Wonderkrater is in marked contrast to almost
constantly low (near-zero) concentrations of this element in adjacent
levels. Subsequent to that platinum spike, pollen grains indicate a drop
in temperature. These discoveries are entirely consistent with the
Younger Dryas Impact Hypothesis.
Wonderkrater is the first site in Africa where a Younger Dryas
platinum spike has been detected, supplementing evidence from southern
Chile, in addition to platinum spikes at 28 sites in the northern
hemisphere.
We are now asking a question which needs to be taken seriously:
surely platinum-rich dust associated with the impact of a very large
meteorite may have contributed to some extent to major climatic change
and extinctions?
neweconomicperspectives | Goldberg’s column is unusually honest for a Democrat like Goldberg.
It includes two important admissions about Joe and Hunter Biden’s poor
judgment in dealing with Ukrainian matters.
As all this was happening, Biden’s son, Hunter, sat on
the board of Burisma Holdings, a natural gas company that Zlochevsky
co-founded, at some points earning $50,000 a month. Zlochevsky might
have thought he could ingratiate himself with the Obama administration
by buying an association with the vice president. All available evidence
suggests he was wrong.
We need to put Hunter Biden’s $50,000 per meeting in perspective, he
began receiving it in 2014, when the purchasing power parity (PPP) per
capita GDP figure for Ukraine was slightly over $8,500. In a single
month, Hunter Biden received fees over six times what a typical
Ukrainian received in a year. Hunter Biden had no relevant expertise to
be on the Ukrainian firm’s board of directors. The only disagreement I
have with Goldberg’s description is her use of the word “earning”
instead of “received.” Hunter Biden does not “earn” his money. He
makes money off those who seek to get in good with his dad. The Trump
children, of course, have super-charged this sleaze.
Hunter’s one real job miraculously led to his ludicrously rapid
promotion to EVP of a major bank. The bank, of course, was a major
contributor to his dad. Hunter’s miraculous advancement to EVP is a
typical sleazy payoff to elite politicians’ kids. Both parties do it.
The sole reason Zlochevsky hired Hunter was to try to influence
favorably his dad and the Obama administration. This too is typical
elite sleaze. Yes, we should remember that Trump’s spouse, children,
and their spouses, make Hunter look like a highly competent saint when
it comes to cashing in on their tawdry Trump ties.
Goldberg correctly notes the modest nature of the sleaze in the
Bidens’ case. There is no evidence that hiring Hunter Biden ingratiated
the Ukrainian firm with the Obama administration. There is no evidence
that hiring Hunter Biden ingratiated the Ukrainian firm with Joe
Biden. Joe Biden’s successful effort to fire the corrupt non-prosecutor
increased the chances that the Ukrainian government would
sanction the firm. Trump’s claim that the fired prosecutor was an
anti-corruption hero investigating Hunter’s purported corruption is a
double lie. Trump’s attacks on Joe and Hunter Biden are lies. This
should not surprise us. First, Trump always lies. Second, Joe and
Hunter Biden’s sketchy actions are not crimes or ethical violations.
They may be ‘corrupt’ in the broad sense of that word in everyday usage,
but not in the legal sense of statutes against corruption. Trump,
therefore, has substituted lies for the nuanced reality.
quillette | Understanding American politics has become increasingly confusing as
the old party labels have lost much of their meaning. A simplistic Left
vs. Right worldview no longer captures the complexity of what’s going
on. As the authors of the October 2017 “Pew Survey of American Political
Typologies” write,
“[I]n a political landscape increasingly fractured by partisanship, the
divisions within the Republican and Democratic coalitions may be as
important a factor in American politics as the divisions between them.”
To understand our politics, we need to understand the cultural values
that drive it. The integral cultural map developed by philosopher Ken
Wilber identifies nine global cultural value systems
including the archaic (survival), tribal (shaman), warrior (warlords
and gangs), traditional (fundamentalist faith in God), modern (democracy
and capitalism), and postmodern (world-centric pluralism). When
combined with Pew’s voter typologies, Wilber’s cultural levels offer a
new map of America’s political landscape.
Of Wilber’s nine global value systems, the Traditional, Modern, and
Postmodern categories are most useful to understanding our moment.
Traditional culture values disciplined adherence to assigned gender and
social roles: men are providers and heads of households, marriage is
between one man and one woman, and the institutions of the military, law
enforcement, and the clergy are all highly respected. Historically,
traditional cultures were monarchies or states ruled by “strongmen.”
Modern culture superseded traditional systems in the West during the
Enlightenment, and values rationality, democracy, meritocracy,
capitalism, and science. Individual rights, free speech, and free
markets harness an entrepreneurial spirit to solve problems.
Postmodern culture offers a borderless, geocentric political view
that values pluralism. It challenges a pro-American narrative by
focusing on the horrors of American history, including the exploitation
of Native Americans, slavery, and persistent inequality
disproportionately affecting historically disadvantaged groups. Those
left behind by modernity and progress now seek recognition, restoration,
and retribution via a politics of protest, and show little interest in
building political organizations or institutions. We are currently
living in a postmodern political moment of disruption, best described by author Helen Pluckrose in her Areo essay “How French Intellectuals Ruined the West: Postmodernism and its Impact, Explained”:
If we see modernity as the tearing down of structures of
power including feudalism, the Church, patriarchy, and Empire,
postmodernists are attempting to continue it, but their targets are now
science, reason, humanism and liberalism. Consequently, the roots of
postmodernism are inherently political and revolutionary, albeit in a
destructive or, as they would term it, deconstructive way.
When we overlay Pew’s data with Wilber’s Value levels, six cultural
political categories emerge: Traditional Left and Right, Modern Left and
Right, and Postmodern Left and Right.
senate.grassley.gov | Two Senate chairmen want to know whether the Justice Department has
acquired information from Ukrainian prosecutors that may contradict the
stated reasoning behind former Vice President Joe Biden’s threat to
withhold U.S. assistance from Ukraine. They are also renewing an inquiry
into the department’s response to reported efforts by Ukrainians, in
coordination with Democratic Party associates, to acquire damaging
information on Donald Trump during his 2016 presidential campaign. In a letter to Attorney General William Barr,
Finance Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) and Homeland
Security and Governmental Affairs Committee Chairman Ron Johnson
(R-Wis.) are seeking additional information about the department’s
review of the Russia investigation’s origins, including the DNC’s
reported work with Ukraine to undermine candidate Trump.
“Ukrainian
efforts, abetted by a U.S. political party, to interfere in the 2016
election should not be ignored. Such allegations of corruption deserve
due scrutiny, and the American people have a right to know when foreign
forces attempt to undermine our democratic processes,” the Senators wrote in the letter.
The letter follows a July, 2017, inquiry from Grassley to the department referencing reports that
a DNC consultant coordinated with the Ukrainian government to acquire
opposition research on Trump during his 2016 presidential campaign.
According to a Politico investigation, “Ukrainian government
officials tried to help Hillary Clinton and undermine Trump” and “helped
Clinton’s allies research damaging information on Trump and his
advisers…” Though media reports indicate that U.S. Attorney John Durham
is investigating whether Ukraine played a role in the
counterintelligence probe during the 2016 election, the Justice
Department has yet to confirm whether it has begun an investigation into
coordination between the Ukrainian government and individuals
associated with the campaign of Hillary Clinton or the Democratic
National Committee.
Separately, a report yesterday revealed
new documents that call into question the stated reasons behind a 2016
ultimatum by then Vice-President Biden to fire a Ukrainian prosecutor
who had investigated a company for which Biden’s son was a board member.
According to the report, Ukrainian officials have tried to forward
documents related to the matter to the department, to no avail. Grassley
and Johnson are requesting details on any actions the department is
taking to review the material referenced in the report.
tomluongo | Trump’s strengths and weaknesses as a political player have been on
full display from the beginning. And he’s made a number of errors which
have cost him dearly to this point.
Most of these have to do with foreign policy, which I have outlined
in gory detail nearly every day for three years. And it was these
deals he’s made on foreign policy, outsourcing it to advisers like H.R.
McMaster, John Bolton and James Mattis, to gain time to deal with his
domestic enemies that have done the most damage.
I think Trump now sees the traps set for him and how badly they will
boomerang on him this election season. He’s begun changing course on
issues like Iran, Syria and, yes, Ukraine.
And for this he is now being targeted, quite amateurishly, for removal from office. Of this I’m convinced at this point.
Since Ukraine cuts across so many different narratives of the past
few years, going all the way back to 2013 EU accession talks, it is no
wonder that President Trump calls to the new Ukrainian President, who
isn’t one of ‘our guys’ like Poroshenko was, would be heavily
scrutinized.
Anything that sniffed even vaguely like Presidential overreach would
be used against Trump to remove him from office. This is the standard
Alinsky tactic of accusing your opponent of what you are guilty of to
de-legitimize any information that comes out of the investigation.
This tactic is nothing new. It’s all they ever do folks, because Trump has already proven he’s immune to ‘Nuts and Sluts.‘
Rejuvenation Pills
-
No one likes getting old. Everyone would like to be immorbid. Let's be
careful here. Immortal doesnt include youth or return to youth. Immorbid
means you s...
Death of the Author — at the Hands of Cthulhu
-
In 1967, French literary theorist and philosopher Roland Barthes wrote of
“The Death of the Author,” arguing that the meaning of a text is divorced
from au...
9/29 again
-
"On this sacred day of Michaelmas, former President Donald Trump invoked
the heavenly power of St. Michael the Archangel, sharing a powerful prayer
for pro...
Return of the Magi
-
Lately, the Holy Spirit is in the air. Emotional energy is swirling out of
the earth.I can feel it bubbling up, effervescing and evaporating around
us, s...
New Travels
-
Haven’t published on the Blog in quite a while. I at least part have been
immersed in the area of writing books. My focus is on Science Fiction an
Historic...
Covid-19 Preys Upon The Elderly And The Obese
-
sciencemag | This spring, after days of flulike symptoms and fever, a man
arrived at the emergency room at the University of Vermont Medical Center.
He ...