amidwesterndoctor |If you do not have time to read this article, there are a few key takeaways from it:
•A
wide range of approaches have been utilized to reduce the population,
many of which directly affect your health and total lifespan regardless
of your desire to have children.
•These horrific
sterilizing campaigns are always first conducted on vulnerable and
ignored groups of people (i.e. impoverished racial minorities), so that
these campaigns can first be trialed and refined out of sight and out of
mind.
•It is in everyone’s best interest to stand
up for these vulnerable groups because if you allow evil to be done to
them, that same evil will eventually end up on your doorstep, and by the
time it has built enough momentum to get there, it is very difficult to
stop.
•The primary obstacle to these campaigns has
always been their technological feasibility; their morality is rarely if
ever considered.
It is my belief that vaccines
represent the ideal form of population control because they are very
easy to administer, they can provide long-term or permanent
sterilization and the blind public faith in vaccination prevents most
people from ever questioning sterilization done under the guise of
“public health.” I am not the only person who realized this and the
Western Elite (currently led by the WHO and Bill Gates) have spent
decades attempting to develop sterilizing vaccines.
There
is clear evidence forced trials of sterilizing vaccines have been
repeatedly occurring over the decades. As such, it was reasonable to
assume that the Eugenicists would not let an opportunity like the Covid
vaccines to go to waste, and there was a real possibility that something
was present in the mRNA vaccines that would cause sterility or death. I
likewise attempted to objectively summarize this complex and
emotionally charged subject here:
Study from Senior Editor of the British Medical Journal Peter Doshi, et al, finds the absolute risk of serious AE from mRNA vaccines exceeds the absolute risk reduction of serious covid-19 infection.https://t.co/6JxOyIZVEHpic.twitter.com/PHhODa2dYt
There's only just so much to be said about the latest chapter in the empire of lies' desperate and ultimately futile attempt to hold onto financial and colonial power. That horse is already out of the barn and there isn't a damn thing any of us can do about it except ride it out as best we can.
🚨: NY Times' Jim Tankersley asks Biden, "How long is it fair to expect American drivers to pay that premium" for the war in Ukraine?
zeta potential though, well, that's a whole other ball of wax. I'm going to make a simple, direct, and hopefully non-controversial claim. Aging is largely a process of all the fluid circulations in your body shutting down. I hadn't thought about that before. Why, because it falls into the yawning crack of unadvertised behavior. Science and the experts don't consider it, therefore it never trickles down into the consensus hubbub, so, out of sight, out of mind. This work here is purportedly about liminal views of consensus reality - so - back to the practical work at hand.
Well, it's not entirely true that I'd completely overlooked the question of fluid circulations, but, the version I had considered for some time, and then put back up on the shelf, was the version taught by taoist alchemy chi kung. According to this systematization, chi or vital energy depends upon the circulation of fluids in and around organ fascia. That's one aspect of zeta potential, and perhaps an oversimplification of chi kung.
Just as there was a powerful and clear signal sent concerning the underlying nature, origin, and purpose of the panicdemic - when the administration changed partisan hands - yet, hot-shots of mRNA goo alone remained the single mandated official response - so also - a very clear and powerful signal has been sent to us. Compare and contrast the west's response to coronavirus with China's continued insistence on hard lock-down procedures. What do they know that our misleadership pretends not to know?
Further, there's the fact that China's allopathic medical response has been more traditional. They are not administering hot shots of mRNA goo and blatantly and extravagantly fucking around with the future viability of the Middle Kingdom's people. Neither are the Russians.
All subjects of the empire of lies, however, are at risk of yet another mandated round of multiple hot shots of experimental goo, including the little children.
Trust the science you sleeping fools.
Trust deeze-nutz muhphukka....,
WW-III has been declared on the subjects of western corporatocracies by our own psychopathocratic gerontocracy. The western panic-demic governance response has nothing whatsoever to do with public health. AFAIC - the madness being inflicted upon us - looks much more like an upgraded core tactic in an arsenal of economic and medical warfare on all of us uselessly eating and no longer economically viable pissants.
There may not be much we can do to stop billion$ being squandered and stolen via Ukraine.
However, we are far from helpless in the face of this specific medicalized assault.
thehill | The Biden administration
announced Wednesday that is paying $3.2 billion for 105 million doses
of an updated Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine for a fall campaign, pending Food
and Drug Administration signoff on the new formula.
The order is a major step in the administration’s efforts to move
forward with a new vaccination push this fall, in a bid to blunt a
renewed COVID-19 surge when the weather turns colder in much of the
country.
The updated vaccine is expected to target the omicron variant, with the goal of providing improved protection.
The new doses are expected to begin to be delivered “as soon as late
summer 2022 and continue into the fourth quarter of this year,” Pfizer
said in a news release.
The Biden administration is using money that it was forced to cut
from other areas of its COVID-19 response after Congress did not act on
the administration’s request for new funds.
The White House is still pushing for more money from Congress, but
prospects on Capitol Hill are not looking particularly hopeful amid a
continued stalemate. Republicans have pushed back on the urgency for the funds.
White House COVID-19 response coordinator Ashish Jha said
that “despite months of warnings from the Administration on the
consequences of a lack of funding,” due to Congress’s lack of action,
Wednesday’s order “will not purchase enough vaccines to offer one of
these new booster shots to every adult and unfortunately, comes at the
expense of continued funding for other critical pandemic response needs
like testing manufacturing and domestic vaccine manufacturing.”
The order placed on Wednesday, though, will ensure the country is not completely lacking in updated vaccines for the fall.
“We look forward to taking delivery of these new variant-specific
vaccines and working with state and local health departments,
pharmacies, health care providers, federally qualified health centers,
and other partners to make them available in communities around the
country this fall,” said Dawn O’Connell, an assistant secretary at the
Department of Health and Human Services.
A Food and Drug Administration advisory committee on Thursday gave
the green light to updating vaccines for omicron, though there are still
more steps in the approval process.
Uptake of even a first booster dose, which is recommended for
everyone aged 5 and older, has been lagging, an indication that not
everyone will want an updated booster this fall.
axial | Schrödinger won the Nobel Prize in Physics in 1933 and was exiled
from his native home Austria after the nation was annexed by Nazi
Germany. He moved to Ireland after he was invited to set up the Dublin
Institute of Advanced Studies. This follows the past history of Ireland
acting as a storehouse of knowledge during the Dark Ages. After decades
of work, biology was becoming more formalized around the 1940s. Better
tools were emerging to perturb various organisms and samples and the
increasing number of discoveries was building out the framework of life.
With the rediscovery of Mendel’s work on genetics, scientists probably
most importantly Thomas Hunt Morgan and his work on fruit flies (Drosophila) set up the rules of heredity - genes located on chromosomes with each cell containing a set of chromosomes. In 1927, a seminal discovery
was made that irradiation by X-rays of fruits flies can induce
mutations. Just the medium was not known where Schrödinger was thinking
through his ideas on biology. At the same type, organic chemistry was
improving and various macromolecules in the cell such as enzymes were
being identified along with the various types of bonds made. For
Schrödinger, there were no tools to characterized these macromolecules
(i.e. proteins, nucleic acids) such as X-ray crystallography. Really the
only tool useful at the time was centrifugation. At the time, many
people expected proteins to be the store and transmitter of genetic
information. Luckily, Oswald Avery published an incredible paper in 1944 that found DNA as probably the store instead of proteins.
With this knowledge base Schrödinger took a beginner’s mind
to biology. In some ways his naivety was incredibly useful. Instead of
being anchored to some widely-accepted premise that proteins transmitted
genetic information (although he had a hunch some protein was
responsible), the book thought from first principles and identified a
few key concepts in biology that were not appreciated but became very
important. Thankfully Schrödinger was curious - he enjoyed writing
poetry and reading philosophy so jumped into biology somewhat
fearlessly. At the beginning of the book, he sets the main question as:
“How
can the events in space and time which take place within the spatial
boundary of a living organism be accounted for by physics and
chemistry?”
Information
In the first chapter,
Schrödinger argues that because organisms have orderly behavior they
must follow the laws of physics. Because physics relies on statistics,
life was follow the same rules. He then argues that because biological
properties have some level of permanence the material that stores this
information then must be stable. This material must have the ability to
change from one stable state to another (i.e. mutations). Classical
physics is not very useful here, but for Schrödinger his expertise in
quantum mechanics helped determine that these stable states must be held
together through covalent bonds (a quantum phenomena) within a
macromolecule. In the early chapters, the book argues that the gene must
be a stable macromolecule.
Through discussion around the
stability of the gene, the book makes its most important breakthrough -
an analogy between a gene and an aperiodic crystal (DNA is aperiodic but
Schrödinger amazingly didn’t know that at the time): “the germ of a
solid.” Simply, a periodic crystal can store a small amount of
information with an infinite number of atoms and an aperiodic crystal
has the ability to store a near infinite amount of information in a
small number of atoms. The latter was more in line with what the current
data suggested what a gene was. Max Delbrück had similar ideas along
with J.B.S. Haldane, but the book was the first to connect this idea to
heredity. But readers at the time and maybe even still overextended this
framework to believe that genetic code contains all of the information
to build an organism. This isn’t true, development requires an
environment with some level of randomness.
wikipedia | In chapter I, Schrödinger explains that most physical laws on a large
scale are due to chaos on a small scale. He calls this principle
"order-from-disorder." As an example he mentions diffusion,
which can be modeled as a highly ordered process, but which is caused
by random movement of atoms or molecules. If the number of atoms is
reduced, the behaviour of a system becomes more and more random. He
states that life greatly depends on order and that a naïve physicist may
assume that the master code of a living organism has to consist of a
large number of atoms.
In chapter II and III, he summarizes what was known at this time
about the hereditary mechanism. Most importantly, he elaborates the
important role mutations play in evolution.
He concludes that the carrier of hereditary information has to be both
small in size and permanent in time, contradicting the naïve physicist's
expectation. This contradiction cannot be resolved by classical physics.
In chapter IV, Schrödinger presents molecules,
which are indeed stable even if they consist of only a few atoms, as
the solution. Even though molecules were known before, their stability
could not be explained by classical physics, but is due to the discrete
nature of quantum mechanics. Furthermore, mutations are directly linked to quantum leaps.
He continues to explain, in chapter V, that true solids, which are also permanent, are crystals.
The stability of molecules and crystals is due to the same principles
and a molecule might be called "the germ of a solid." On the other hand,
an amorphous solid, without crystalline structure, should be regarded as a liquid with a very high viscosity.
Schrödinger believes the heredity material to be a molecule, which
unlike a crystal does not repeat itself. He calls this an aperiodic
crystal. Its aperiodic nature allows it to encode an almost infinite
number of possibilities with a small number of atoms. He finally
compares this picture with the known facts and finds it in accordance
with them.
In chapter VI Schrödinger states:
...living matter, while not eluding the "laws of
physics" as established up to date, is likely to involve "other laws of
physics" hitherto unknown, which however, once they have been revealed,
will form just as integral a part of science as the former.
He knows that this statement is open to misconception and tries to
clarify it. The main principle involved with "order-from-disorder" is
the second law of thermodynamics, according to which entropy only increases in a closed system (such as the universe). Schrödinger explains that living matter evades the decay to thermodynamical equilibrium by homeostatically maintaining negative entropy in an open system.
In chapter VII, he maintains that "order-from-order" is not
absolutely new to physics; in fact, it is even simpler and more
plausible. But nature follows "order-from-disorder", with some
exceptions as the movement of the celestial bodies
and the behaviour of mechanical devices such as clocks. But even those
are influenced by thermal and frictional forces. The degree to which a
system functions mechanically or statistically depends on the
temperature. If heated, a clock ceases to function, because it melts.
Conversely, if the temperature approaches absolute zero,
any system behaves more and more mechanically. Some systems approach
this mechanical behaviour rather fast with room temperature already
being practically equivalent to absolute zero.
Schrödinger concludes this chapter and the book with philosophical speculations on determinism, free will, and the mystery of human consciousness.
He attempts to "see whether we cannot draw the correct
non-contradictory conclusion from the following two premises: (1) My
body functions as a pure mechanism according to Laws of Nature; and (2)
Yet I know, by incontrovertible direct experience, that I am directing
its motions, of which I foresee the effects, that may be fateful and
all-important, in which case I feel and take full responsibility for
them. The only possible inference from these two facts is, I think, that
I – I in the widest meaning of the word, that is to say, every
conscious mind that has ever said or felt 'I' – am the person, if any,
who controls the 'motion of the atoms' according to the Laws of Nature".
Schrödinger then states that this insight is not new and that Upanishads
considered this insight of "ATHMAN = BRAHMAN" to "represent
quintessence of deepest insights into the happenings of the world."
Schrödinger rejects the idea that the source of consciousness should
perish with the body because he finds the idea "distasteful". He also
rejects the idea that there are multiple immortal souls that can exist
without the body because he believes that consciousness is nevertheless
highly dependent on the body. Schrödinger writes that, to reconcile the
two premises,
The only possible alternative is simply
to keep to the immediate experience that consciousness is a singular of
which the plural is unknown; that there is only one thing and that what
seems to be a plurality is merely a series of different aspects of this
one thing…
Any intuitions that consciousness is plural, he says, are illusions. Schrödinger is sympathetic to the Hindu concept of Brahman, by which each individual's consciousness is only a manifestation of a unitary consciousness pervading the universe
— which corresponds to the Hindu concept of God. Schrödinger concludes
that "...'I' am the person, if any, who controls the 'motion of the
atoms' according to the Laws of Nature." However, he also qualifies the
conclusion as "necessarily subjective" in its "philosophical
implications". In the final paragraph, he points out that what is meant
by "I" is not the collection of experienced events but "namely the
canvas upon which they are collected." If a hypnotist succeeds in
blotting out all earlier reminiscences, he writes, there would be no
loss of personal existence — "Nor will there ever be."[8]
medical-net | Quantum biology is an emerging field of science, established in the
1920s, which looks at whether the subatomic world of quantum mechanics
plays a role in living cells. Quantum mechanics is an interdisciplinary
field by nature, bringing together nuclear physicists, biochemists and
molecular biologists.
In a research paper published by the journal Physical Chemistry
Chemical Physics, a team from Surrey's Leverhulme Quantum Biology
Doctoral Training Centre used state-of-the-art computer simulations and
quantum mechanical methods to determine the role proton tunneling, a
purely quantum phenomenon, plays in spontaneous mutations inside DNA.
Proton tunneling involves the spontaneous disappearance of a proton
from one location and the same proton's re-appearance nearby.
The
research team found that atoms of hydrogen, which are very light,
provide the bonds that hold the two strands of the DNA's double helix
together and can, under certain conditions, behave like spread-out waves
that can exist in multiple locations at once, thanks to proton
tunneling. This leads to these atoms occasionally being found on the
wrong strand of DNA, leading to mutations.
Although these mutations' lifetime is short, the team from Surrey has
revealed that they can still survive the DNA replication mechanism
inside cells and could potentially have health consequences.
Dr Marco Sacchi, the project lead and Royal Society University
Research Fellow at the University of Surrey, said: "Many have long
suspected that the quantum world - which is weird, counter-intuitive and
wonderful - plays a role in life as we know it. While the idea that
something can be present in two places at the same time might be absurd
to many of us, this happens all the time in the quantum world, and our
study confirms that quantum tunneling also happens in DNA at room
temperature."
There is still a long and exciting road ahead of us to understand how
biological processes work on the subatomic level, but our study - and
countless others over the recent years - have confirmed quantum
mechanics are at play. In the future, we are hoping to investigate how
tautomers produced by quantum tunneling can propagate and generate
genetic mutations."
Louie Slocombe, PhD Student, Leverhulme Quantum Biology Doctoral Training Centre and Study Co-Author
Jim Al-Khalili, a co-author of the study and Co-Director of the
Leverhulme Quantum Biology Doctoral Training Centre at the University of
Surrey, said: "It has been thrilling to work with this group of young,
diverse and talented thinkers - made up of a broad coalition of the
scientific world. This work cements quantum biology as the most exciting
field of scientific research in the 21st century."
discovermagazine |With photosynthesis, scientists show
for the first time that there are quantum effects in living systems.
This could lead to better solar panels, energy storage or even quantum
computers. (Credit: Shutterstock) We all probably learned about photosynthesis,
how plants turn sunlight into energy, in school. It might seem,
therefore, that we figured out this bit of the world. But scientists are
still learning new things about even the most basic stuff (see also
the sun and moon), and photosynthesis is no different. In particular, according to a study released Monday in Nature Chemistry,
an international team of scientists showed that molecules involved in
photosynthesis display quantum mechanical behavior. Even though we’d suspected
as much before, this is the first time we’ve seen quantum effects in
living systems. Not only will it help us better understand plants,
sunlight and everything in between, but it could also mean cool new tech
in the future.
The Quantum Conundrum
First, let’s back up. While photosynthesis may be taught in classrooms
the world over, quantum mechanics is a bit less popular, in part because
it’s so weird. Nobel Prize-winning quantum physicist Richard Feynman
once said, "I think I can safely say that nobody understands quantum
mechanics." It’s so impenetrable to non-experts that the same metaphors
come up whenever someone tries to explain it. You might have heard of Schrödinger's Cat,
which is both alive and dead at the same time thanks to quantum
weirdness — in particular, because electrons can be in two states at the
same time. It’s only when we observe the system that the weirdness
collapses and reality “picks” one state: the cat’s actually alive (or
dead), the electron’s actually at this end of the room (or that end).
But quantum effects are typically limited to the very small, and only
really observable in perfect, laboratory conditions. A living being,
with its wet, messy systems, would be a tough place to find some quantum
weirdness lurking — and yet we have.
Molecular Madness
Scientists zoomed in on the Fenna-Matthews-Olson (FMO) complex, a key component of green sulfur bacteria's machinery
for photosynthesis. It’s been a historical favorite for such research
because we’ve long known its structure and it's fairly easy to work
with. Previous experiments had seemed to show light-sensitive molecules
in this area in two different states at the same time — that’s quantum
weirdness — but the effect lasted more than 1 picosecond, which is much
longer than expected. This new study shows that it was really just
regular vibrations in the molecules, nothing quantum about it. But
researchers have been excited about the possibilities of quantum biology
for years, so having disproved the earlier experiments, the authors
wanted to find some new evidence of their own. “We wondered if we might
be able to observe that Schrödinger cat situation,” says co-author
Thomas la Cour Jansen in a press release. And observe it they did! With a
technique called two-dimensional electronic spectroscopy, researchers
saw molecules in simultaneous excited states — quantum weirdness akin to
a cat being alive and dead at the same time. What’s more, the effect
lasted exactly as long as theories predicted it, suggesting this
evidence of quantum biology will last. As the authors succinctly put it,
“Thus, our measurements provide an unambiguous experimental observation
of excited-state vibronic coherence in the FMO complex.” What could be
simpler? The results shed light (haha) on how to harvest energy from
light, and the team thinks they’re “generally applicable” to a variety
of systems, living and non-living alike. This means it could result in
engineering benefits such as better solar panels, energy storage or even
quantum computers. And, of course, updated textbooks for tomorrow’s
lessons on photosynthesis.
quantamagazine | It’s not surprising that quantum physics has a reputation for being
weird and counterintuitive. The world we’re living in sure doesn’t feel
quantum mechanical. And until the 20th century, everyone assumed that
the classical laws of physics devised by Isaac Newton and others —
according to which objects have well-defined positions and properties at
all times — would work at every scale. But Max Planck, Albert Einstein,
Niels Bohr and their contemporaries discovered that down among atoms
and subatomic particles, this concreteness dissolves into a soup of
possibilities. An atom typically can’t be assigned a definite position,
for example — we can merely calculate the probability of finding it in
various places. The vexing question then becomes: How do quantum
probabilities coalesce into the sharp focus of the classical world?
Physicists sometimes talk about this changeover as the
“quantum-classical transition.” But in fact there’s no reason to think
that the large and the small have fundamentally different rules, or that
there’s a sudden switch between them. Over the past several decades,
researchers have achieved a greater understanding of how quantum
mechanics inevitably becomes classical mechanics through an interaction
between a particle or other microscopic system and its surrounding
environment.
One of the most remarkable ideas in this theoretical framework is
that the definite properties of objects that we associate with classical
physics — position and speed, say — are selected from a menu of quantum
possibilities in a process loosely analogous to natural selection in
evolution: The properties that survive are in some sense the “fittest.”
As in natural selection, the survivors are those that make the most
copies of themselves. This means that many independent observers can
make measurements of a quantum system and agree on the outcome — a
hallmark of classical behavior.
This idea, called quantum Darwinism (QD), explains a lot about why we
experience the world the way we do rather than in the peculiar way it
manifests at the scale of atoms and fundamental particles. Although
aspects of the puzzle remain unresolved, QD helps heal the apparent rift
between quantum and classical physics.
Only recently, however, has quantum Darwinism been put to the
experimental test. Three research groups, working independently in
Italy, China and Germany, have looked for the telltale signature of the
natural selection process by which information about a quantum system
gets repeatedly imprinted on various controlled environments. These
tests are rudimentary, and experts say there’s still much more to be
done before we can feel sure that QD provides the right picture of how
our concrete reality condenses from the multiple options that quantum
mechanics offers. Yet so far, the theory checks out.
“The Jackpot” is a reference to William Gibson’s The Peripheral.
Here’s the quote; I think it’s self-explanatory.
[The Jackpot] was androgenic, he said, and she knew from Ciencia Loca and National Geographic
that meant because of people. Not that they’d known what they were
doing, had meant to make problems, but they’d caused it anyway. And in
fact the actual climate, the weather, caused by there being too much
carbon, had been the driver for a lot of other things. How that got
worse and never better, and was just expected to, ongoing. Because
people in the past, clueless as to how that worked, had fucked it all
up, then not been able to get it together to do anything about it, even
after they knew, and now it was too late.
So now, in her day, he said, they were headed into androgenic,
systemic, multiplex, seriously bad shit, like she sort of already knew,
figured everybody did, except for people who still said it wasn’t
happening, and those people were mostly expecting the Second Coming
anyway. She’d looked across the silver lawn, that Leon had cut with the
push-mower whose cast-iron frame was held together with actual baling
wire, to where moon shadows lay, past stunted boxwoods and the stump of a
concrete birdbath they’d pretened was a dragon’s castle, while Wilf
told her it killed 80 percent of every last person alive, over about
forty years. …
No comets crashing, nothing you could really call a nuclear war. Just
everything else, tangled in the changing climate: droughts, water
shortages, crop failures, honeybees gone like they almost were now,
collapse of other keystone species, every last alpha predator gone,
antibiotics doing even less than they already did, diseases that were
never quite the one big pandemic but big enough to be historic events in
themselves. And all of it around people: how people were, how many of
them there were, how they’d changed things just by being there. …
But science, he said, had been the wild card, the twist. With
everything stumbling deeper into a ditch of shit, history itself become a
slaughterhouse, science had started popping. Not all at once, no one
big heroic thing, but there were cleaner, cheaper energy sources, more
effective ways to get carbon out of the air, new drugs that did what
antibiotics had done before…. Ways to print food that required much less
in the way of actual food to begin with. So everything, however deeply
fucked in general, was lit increasingly by the new, by things that made
people blink and sit up, but then the rest of it would just go on,
deeper into the ditch. A progress accompanied by constant violence, he
said, by sufferings unimaginable. …
None of that, he said, had necessarily been as bad for very rich
people. The richest had gotten richer, there being fewer to own whatever
there was. Constant crisis bad provided constant opportunity. That was
where his world had come from, he said. At the deepest point of
everything going to shit, population radically reduced, the survivors
saw less carbon being dumped into the system, with what was still being
produced being eaten by those towers they’d built… And seeing that, for
them, the survivors, was like seeing the bullet dodged.
spiegel | Meanwhile,
a large population of the feebleminded have continued to ignore the
dangers presented by the virus and refuse to be vaccinated. Indeed, the
untenable situation in Germany’s intensive care units is primarily due
to this group. In its most recent weekly report, the RKI notes that 87
percent of adults under 60 receiving intensive care due to COVID-19 have
not been vaccinated.
"The winter will be a societal and medical challenge for Germany,
resulting from a lack of preparation, clear rules and rigor," said
Gerald Haug, president of the German National Academy of Sciences
Leopoldina. The unusually stern tone of his message is justified. Almost
no preventative measures were taken, the rules now in place aren’t
particularly rigorous, and they are hardly enforced.
The fact that
Germany is stumbling into the fall virtually unprepared is one problem.
The fact that the country has essentially been without leadership since
the September general election is another. The leadership shown – or
better, not shown – by the country’s political representatives in recent
months borders on malpractice. Hardly anyone is doing what they should
be doing in the face of a crisis like this. Angela Merkel is no longer
offering guidance. Her likely successor, Olaf Scholz, isn’t yet in
office. And even worse, the next coalition will in all likelihood
include the Free Democrats (FDP), a party which, when it comes to
measures to control the coronavirus, is far more focused on what they
don’t want than on what is necessary.
The result is that Germany’s federal politicians are pushing off
responsibility onto the states. And they are again doing what they
always do: Each state comes up with its own strategy. No coordination.
Collective negligence.
The consequences are serious. Whereas more
than half the population of Israel has received a third dose of vaccine,
the rate in Germany is just 4 percent. Despite the fact that it has
been known for some time that protection from the initial doses begins
to wane after a few months.
Back in summer, immunologists and
virologists made it clear to the German government that all elderly
people in the country and those with compromised immune systems needed
to receive a booster, which can increase protection from the virus by up
to 20 times. The Health Ministry, under the leadership of Jens Spahn,
calculated that up to 11 million people could be reached by the end of
October. It is now November, and just over 3 million have received their
booster shots. Just how outgoing Chancellery Chief of Staff Helge Braun
intends to achieve his self-proclaimed target of 20 million boosters by
the end of the year remains his secret. Preparations for the campaign
have suffered for weeks from chaotic agreements and contradictory
statements.
And it was Health Minister Spahn himself who was the source of much
of the confusion. After he – in concert with the RKI – initially
recommended booster shots after six months for the elderly, those with
weak immune systems and health-care personnel, he suddenly shifted his
approach two weeks ago. He did so in response to a discussion with his
Israeli counterpart, who has been preaching booster shots for some time.
There are now indications that boosters don’t just help at-risk
patients, but can also result in a lower virus transmission rate, thus
breaking new chains of infection.
So, Spahn also suddenly recommended that everyone get their booster shot.
The
consequence has been massive confusion in medical practices across the
country. Primary care physicians say their phone lines were suddenly
jammed and people mobbed their offices – right at the beginning of the
cold and flu season. Last Tuesday, the outraged doctors took an unusual
step. In comments to journalists in Berlin, Andreas Gassen, head of the
National Association of Statutory Health Insurance Physicians, said that
comments from political leaders introduced "chaos" into German medical
practices. It was clear that he was talking about Spahn.
newyorker | Last summer, an anonymous intermediary proposed to
Harris and Harden that they address their unresolved issues. Harden
appeared on Harris’s podcast, and patiently explained why Murray’s
speculation was dangerously out in front of the science. At the moment,
technical and methodological challenges, as well as the persistent
effects of an unequal environment, would make it impossible to conduct
an experiment to test Murray’s idly incendiary hypotheses. She refused
to grant that his provocations were innocent: “I don’t disagree with you
about insisting on intellectual honesty, but I think of it as
‘both/and’—I think that that value is very important, but I also find it
very important to listen to people when they say, ‘I’m worried about
how this idea might be used to harm me or my family or my neighborhood
or my group.’ ” (Harris declined to comment on the record for this
piece.) As she once put it in an essay, “There is a middle ground
between ‘let’s never talk about genes and pretend cognitive ability
doesn’t exist’ and ‘let’s just ask some questions that pander to a
virulent on-line community populated by racists with swastikas in their
Twitter bios.’ ”
Harden
is not alone in her drive to fulfill Turkheimer’s dream of a
“psychometric left.” Dalton Conley and Jason Fletcher’s book, “The
Genome Factor,” from 2017, outlines similar arguments, as does the
sociologist Jeremy Freese. Last year, Fredrik deBoer published “The Cult
of Smart,” which argues that the education-reform movement has been
trammelled by its willful ignorance of genetic variation. Views
associated with the “hereditarian left” have also been articulated by
the psychiatrist and essayist Scott Alexander and the philosopher Peter
Singer. Singer told me, of Harden, “Her ethical arguments are ones that I
have held for quite a long time. If you ignore these things that
contribute to inequality, or pretend they don’t exist, you make it more
difficult to achieve the kind of society that you value.” He added,
“There’s a politically correct left that’s still not open to these
things.” Stuart Ritchie, an intelligence researcher, told me he thinks
that Harden’s book might create its own audience: “There’s so much
toxicity in this debate that it’ll take a long time to change people’s
minds on it, if at all, but I think Paige’s book is just so clear in its
explanation of the science.”
The nomenclature has
given Harden pause, depending on the definition of “hereditarian,”
which can connote more biodeterminist views, and the definition of
“left”—deBoer is a communist, Alexander leans libertarian, and Harden
described herself to me as a “Matthew 25:40 empiricist” (“The King will
reply, ‘Truly I tell you, whatever you did for one of the least of these
brothers and sisters of mine, you did for me’ ”). The political
sensitivity of the subject has convinced many sympathetic economists,
psychologists, and geneticists to keep their heads below the parapets of
academia. As the population geneticist I spoke to put it to me,
“Geneticists know how to talk about this stuff to each other, in part
because we understand terms like ‘heritability,’ which we use in
technical ways that don’t always fully overlap with their colloquial
meanings, and in part because we’re charitable with each other, assume
each other’s good faith—we know that our colleagues aren’t eugenicists.
But we have no idea how to talk about it in public, and, while I don’t
agree with everything she said, sometimes it feels like we’ve all been
sitting around waiting for a book like Paige’s.”
Harden’s
outspokenness has generated significant blowback from the left. On
Twitter, she has been caricatured as a kind of ditzy bourgeois
dilettante who gives succor to the viciousness of the alt-right. This
March, after she expressed support for standardized testing—which she
argues predicts student success above and beyond G.P.A. and can help
increase low-income and minority representation—a parody account
appeared under the handle @EugenicInc, with the name “Dr. Harden, Social
Justice Through Eugenics!” and the bio “Not a determinist, but yes,
genes cause everything. I just want to breed more Hilary Clinton’s for
higher quality future people.” One tweet read, “In This House We
Believe, Science is Real, Womens Rights are Human Rights, Black Lives
Matter, News Isnt Fake, Some Kids Have Dumb-Dumb Genes!!!”
In 2018, she wrote an Op-Ed in the Times,
arguing that progressives should embrace the potential of genetics to
inform education policy. Dorothy Roberts, a professor of law, sociology,
and Africana studies at the University of Pennsylvania, strongly
disagreed: “There’s just no way that genetic testing is going to lead to
a restructuring of society in a just way in the future—we have a
hundred years of evidence for what happens when social outcomes are
attributed to genetic differences, and it is always to stigmatize,
control, and punish the people predicted to have socially devalued
traits.” Darity, the economist, told me that he doesn’t see how Harden
can insist that differences within groups are genetic but that
differences between them are not: “It’s a feint and a dodge for her to
say, ‘Well, I’m only looking at variations across individuals.’ ”
There
is a good precedent for this kind of concern. In “Blueprint,” Robert
Plomin wrote that polygenic scores should be understood as “fortune
tellers” that can “foretell our futures from birth.” Jared Taylor, a
white-supremacist leader, argued that Plomin’s book should “destroy the
basis for the entire egalitarian enterprise of the last 60 or so years.”
He seized on Plomin’s claim that, for many outcomes, “environmental
levers for change are not within our grasp.” Taylor wrote, “This is a
devastating finding for the armies of academics and uplift artists who
think every difference in outcome is society’s fault.” He continued,
“And, although Blueprint includes nothing about race, the implications
for ‘racial justice’ are just as colossal.” Harden has been merciless in
her response to behavior geneticists whose disciplinary
salesmanship—and perhaps worse—inadvertently indulges the extreme right.
In her own review of Plomin’s book, she wrote, “Insisting that DNA
matters is scientifically accurate; insisting that it is the only thing
that matters is scientifically outlandish.” (Plomin told me that Harden
misrepresented his intent. He added, “Good luck to Paige in convincing
people who are engaged in the culture wars about this middle path she’s
suggesting. . . . My view is it isn’t worth confronting people and
arguing with them.”)
With the first review of
Harden’s book, these dynamics played out on cue. Razib Khan, a
conservative science blogger identified with the “human biodiversity”
movement, wrote that he admired her presentation of the science but was
put off by the book’s politics; though he notes that a colleague of his
once heard Harden described as “Charles Murray in a skirt,” he clearly
thinks the honorific was misplaced. “Alas, if you do not come to this
work with Harden’s commitment to social justice, much of the
non-scientific content will strike you as misguided, gratuitous and at
times even unfair.” This did not prevent some on the Twitter left from
expressing immediate disgust. Kevin Bird, who describes himself in his
Twitter bio as a “radical scientist,” tweeted, “Personally, I wouldn’t
be very happy if a race science guy thought my book was good.” Harden
sighed when she recounted the exchange: “It’s always from both flanks.
It felt like another miniature version of Harris on one side and Darity
on the other.”
foxnews | As colleges issue controversial mandates that students be vaccinated or not attend classes, and reports surfaced of numerous deaths potentially caused by the various coronavirus vaccines, the inventor of the mRNA technology that went into some of the vaccines told Fox News on Wednesday that Google-owned YouTube deleted a posting of a podcast during which he discussed his concerns and findings.
As "Tucker Carlson Tonight" host Tucker Carlson noted, Dr. Robert Malone is "the single most qualified" expert on mRNA vaccines, but that the Big Tech companies are asserting themselves as more informed than him on the topic.
"A
Norwegian study conducted of 100 nursing home residents who died after
receiving Pfizer's Corona shots. They found that at least ten of those
deaths were likely caused by the vaccine. 10%," said Carlson.
Meanwhile, the New York Post reported that researchers found a link between rare cases of juvenile heart inflammation and vaccines from Pfizer and Moderna, which utilize the mRNA route.
"Young adults in the prime of their lives are being forced to take the vaccine because Tony Fauci said that," Carlson said, adding that Malone "has a right to speak," given his expertise.
"[O]ne of my concerns are that the government is not being transparent
with us about what those risks are. And so, I am of the opinion that
people have the right to decide whether to accept vaccines or not,
especially since these are experimental vaccines," Dr. Malone said,
pointing to the fact the vaccines are not formally approved but instead
being administered under Emergency Use Authorization.
"This is a fundamental right having to do with clinical research
ethics," he said. "And so, my concern is that I know that there are
risks. But we don't have access to the data and the data haven't been
captured rigorously enough so that we can accurately assess those risks –
And therefore … we don't really have the information that we need to
make a reasonable decision."
Malone said that in the case of
younger Americans, he "has a bias that the benefits probably don't
outweigh the risks in that cohort."
But, he noted there is no substantive risk-benefit analysis being applied to the vaccines.
daily.jstor | Deriving from the Greek words for “before” and “guard,” prophylaxis
refers to a variety of precautionary measures designed to predict and
preempt a negative outcome, primarily in a medical context. Vaccines
fortify the body against certain viruses; condoms and other prophylactic
barriers can prevent pregnancy and the transmission of STIs; and
routine screenings like mammograms and colonoscopies are designed to
detect and neutralize issues in their early stages.
However, at the time that Fitzgerald wrote the lyrics quoted above,
prophylaxis was most frequently invoked as an extension of eugenic
ideology and practice. Marshalling the white supremacist science of
“racial hygiene,” doctors became amateur sociologists recommending
“prophylactic” solutions to social problems. These solutions included
both “negative eugenics”—the institutionalization and forced sterilization of prostitutes, poor women, women of color, and disabled people—as well as “positive eugenics,” which attempted to increase the birthrate among white, upper middle class, nondisabled, and neurotypical families.
Consider, for example, these remarks
by Dr. R.M. Funkhouser which link the science of preventative medicine
to private decisions around romantic courtship. This advice appeared in a
1913 issue of the Journal of the Missouri State Medical Association just one year before Fitzgerald wrote “Love or Eugenics”:
The quality of human beings should count and not
quantity. Is it not wiser and better that prophylaxis precede than
wholesale destruction follow?… The general knowledge of the laws of
heredity should be more largely disseminated and marriage should
primarily depend on the desire to produce ‘worthy’ offspring with the
best qualities.
To be clear, when Funkhouser weighs the benefits of “prophylaxis”
against a future of “destruction,” the calamity he is referring to is
the imagined contamination and degradation of white bloodlines.
Prescriptions like these were echoed in countless medical publications
of the period and strongly influenced both public policy and popular
culture. The same year, the United States Surgeon General, Rupert Blue,
advocated for the use of “eugenic marriage certificates,” which would certify the mental and physical health of both partners in advance of their wedding.
By the end of the decade in which Fitzgerald was writing, state fairs across the country would begin to hold “fitter families” contests,
transforming these medical recommendations into a recreational pastime.
Making an anxious spectacle of the usually unmarked category of
whiteness, middle class families competed for “top honors” by undergoing a series of mental and physical evaluations designed to test their eugenic fitness.
Winners were announced and ribbons were awarded—though any family that
scored a B+ or higher was presented with a medal bearing the
inscription, “Yea, I have a goodly heritage.”
Arguably, Fitzgerald is poking fun at practices like these; his
lyrics appear to satirize prophylactic marriage and invite skepticism
around the wisdom of applying the “laws of heredity” to mate selection.
While Dr. Funkhouser would no doubt advocate choosing a “prophylactic
dame” over “kisses that set your heart aflame,” the plot arc of the
musical validates the opposite outcome as the charming Celeste wins out
over the eugenically “fit” Clover.
Medium |Ingrid
von Oelhafen (born in 1941) had a tough childhood. Her father Herman
von Oelhafen was often away. Her mother Gisela was emotionally distant.
Her parents sent Ingrid to the children’s home, where she grew up
without true parental love.
When
she was eleven years old, she found out that she was a foster child.
Her actual name was Erika Matko. Her father Herman and mother Gisela
were not her true parents. Her brother Dietmar was not her real brother.
When
she was fifteen, she saw a Red Cross poster with her childhood image
with the name Erika Matko on the streets of Hamburg. She realized she
was not German.
In 1999, Red Cross contacted Ingrid, asking if she wanted to learn about her true origins. She was fifty-eight years old.
Medium |ABBA
was one of the most popular music groups in history. You have probably
heard at least one of their hits. For example Waterloo, SOS, or Mamma
Mia. At the height of their popularity, ABBA earned more money than
another Swedish trademark — automobile company Volvo.
Lebensborn means Spring of life
in German. However, this word received a much more malevolent meaning
in the time of Nazi Germany. The Lebensborn program was a notorious Nazi
project, which tried to increase the Aryan population. They used
various inhumane methods, including state-sponsored breeding and
abducting of children from Nazi-occupied countries such as Poland,
Russia, and Yugoslavia.
The
ideal Aryan had blue eyes and blonde hair. The Scandinavians perfectly
fit into this requirement. The Lebensborn program encouraged German
soldiers to have relationships with Danish and Norwegian women. In
Norway only, over 12,000 children were born from such relationships.
wikipedia |Lebensborn e.V. (literally: "Fount of Life") was an SS-initiated, state-supported, registered association in Nazi Germany with the goal of raising the birth rate of Aryan children of persons classified as 'racially pure' and 'healthy' based on Nazi racial hygiene and health ideology.
Lebensborn provided welfare to its mostly unmarried mothers, encouraged
anonymous births by unmarried women at their maternity homes, and
mediated adoption of these children by likewise 'racially pure' and 'healthy' parents, particularly SS members and their families. The Cross of Honour of the German Mother
was given to the women who bore the most Aryan children. Abortion was
legalised (and, more commonly, endorsed) by the Nazis for disabled and
non-Germanic children, but strictly punished otherwise.
Initially set up in Germany in 1935, Lebensborn expanded into several occupied European countries with Germanic populations
during the Second World War. It included the selection of 'racially
worthy' orphans for adoption and care for children born from Aryan women
who had been in relationships with SS members. It originally excluded
children born from unions between common soldiers and foreign women,
because there was no proof of 'racial purity'
on both sides. During the war, many children were kidnapped from their
parents and judged by Aryan criteria for their suitability to be raised
in Lebensborn homes, and fostering by German families.
salk | Scientists have known for a while that SARS-CoV-2’s distinctive
“spike” proteins help the virus infect its host by latching on to
healthy cells. Now, a major new study shows that they also play a key
role in the disease itself.
The paper, published on April 30, 2021, in Circulation Research,
also shows conclusively that COVID-19 is a vascular disease,
demonstrating exactly how the SARS-CoV-2 virus damages and attacks the
vascular system on a cellular level. The findings help explain
COVID-19’s wide variety of seemingly unconnected complications, and
could open the door for new research into more effective therapies.
“A lot of people think of it as a respiratory disease, but it’s really a vascular disease,” says Assistant Research Professor Uri Manor,
who is co-senior author of the study. “That could explain why some
people have strokes, and why some people have issues in other parts of
the body. The commonality between them is that they all have vascular
underpinnings.”
Salk researchers collaborated with scientists at
the University of California San Diego on the paper, including co-first
author Jiao Zhang and co-senior author John Shyy, among others.
While
the findings themselves aren’t entirely a surprise, the paper provides
clear confirmation and a detailed explanation of the mechanism through
which the protein damages vascular cells for the first time. There’s
been a growing consensus that SARS-CoV-2 affects the vascular system,
but exactly how it did so was not understood. Similarly, scientists
studying other coronaviruses have long suspected that the spike protein
contributed to damaging vascular endothelial cells, but this is the
first time the process has been documented.
In the new study, the
researchers created a “pseudovirus” that was surrounded by SARS-CoV-2
classic crown of spike proteins, but did not contain any actual virus.
Exposure to this pseudovirus resulted in damage to the lungs and
arteries of an animal model—proving that the spike protein alone was
enough to cause disease. Tissue samples showed inflammation in
endothelial cells lining the pulmonary artery walls.
The team then
replicated this process in the lab, exposing healthy endothelial cells
(which line arteries) to the spike protein. They showed that the spike
protein damaged the cells by binding ACE2. This binding disrupted ACE2’s
molecular signaling to mitochondria (organelles that generate energy
for cells), causing the mitochondria to become damaged and fragmented.
Previous
studies have shown a similar effect when cells were exposed to the
SARS-CoV-2 virus, but this is the first study to show that the damage
occurs when cells are exposed to the spike protein on its own.
thescientist | Despite being treated with drugs designed to target this gene, the
patients were not getting better, and when we interrogated the genomes
of their cancers after the tumors were surgically removed following
treatment, we saw that they had changed. The tumors had dramatically
reduced the number of copies of the targeted epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)
gene, presumably giving them an advantage to escape the drugs, and they
had evolved these genetic differences at a rate that seemed to make no
sense—within just one to two weeks.
Normally, we think of cancers evolving over many cell divisions, as
the cells carrying genetic changes that provide a fitness advantage—such
as an ability to resist a particular treatment—will be more likely to
survive and divide. Here, we were noticing a change in the copy number
of the gene within just a few generations. There was no way that we
could explain how the tumors were altering their DNA so quickly.
Even
stranger, we could take any cell from the tumor, and whether it had
high or undetectable protein levels of EGFR, it would give rise to a new
tumor when cultured in the lab or implanted into a mouse. Each of these
new tumors would then display the full spectrum of cells found in the
original tumor, varied in their EGFR copy number. This makes no
sense according to what we know about classical genetics. We would have
expected that tumors arising from a cell with low levels of EGFR would
give rise to a tumor with low EGFR levels, whereas a tumor arising from a
cell with high levels of EGFR would give rise to a tumor with high EGFR
levels.
When we removed the treatment with the EGFR inhibitor from
cultured tumor cells, EGFR copy number quickly rebounded, but again, not
on chromosomes. When we saw this, we realized that ecDNA might explain
why some cancers can become resistant to treatment so quickly, allowing
tumors to evolve at a rate that far exceeds anything that could be
accounted for by classical genetics. We published our results in Sciencein
2014, but they were not immediately accepted by the community. Although
we had only studied one tumor type, glioblastoma, we began to wonder
whether this might be the tip of the iceberg.
Without realizing
it, this study led us, and now others, to a series of discoveries that
have changed the way that researchers view cancer in general, revealing
frightening ways that tumors can evolve. We have learned that ecDNA is
central to the behavior of some of the most aggressive forms of cancer,
enabling remarkably elevated levels of oncogene transcription, creating
new gene regulatory interactions, and providing a powerful mechanism for
rapid change that can drive very high oncogene copy numbers or allow
cancer cells to resist treatment. Fist tap Woodensplinter
interfluidity | I think it makes perfect sense that liberalism has become a kind of
upper-class creed. So long as it is, liberalism is in peril, and should
be. There are illiberal currents on both the left and right that would
exploit popular dissatisfaction to remake society in ways that I would
very much dislike, whether by restoring a “traditional” hierarchy of
implicit caste, or by granting diverse professionals even more
prescriptive authority than they already have at the expense of liberty
for the less enlightened.
My strong preference is that we do neither of
these things, and instead restore the broad appeal of liberalism by
“leveling up”. We should ensure that everyone has the means to rely upon
some mix of the market and the state to see to their material welfare,
reducing the economic role of networks of personal reciprocity and
history. This would render the good parts of liberalism more broadly and
ethically accessible.
Reducing economic stratification makes liberal
proceduralism more credible pretty automatically. When economic and
institutional power are dispersed and broadly shared, no one has a
built-in edge, and aspirations of neutrality and fairness become
plausible. Once we view society less through a lens of domination and
oppression — because in a more materially equal society that will be a
less credible lens — it will become possible to agree on a common,
stable set of commercial and professional mores rather than extend
deference to myriad communities’ evolving sensibilities. It will be
practical for the broad public to learn and understand those common
mores, and so not be excluded or set apart from professional communities
by what come to seem like inscrutable courtly conventions.
There are undoubtedly tensions between liberalism and egalitarianism.
But they are yin to one another’s yang. Opposites in a sense, they must
be reconciled if either is to survive.
NYTimes | The coronavirus has been particularly
devastating for Indigenous communities. It has killed American Indians
and Alaska Natives at nearly twice the rate of white people, and inflicted a cultural crisis
by killing the elders who pass down language and traditional teachings.
The economic toll of the pandemic has pummeled Native economies already
racked by high poverty and unemployment.
The
vaccine rollout in Native communities has been a surprising source of
strength, especially as vaccinations of other communities, such as Black
and Hispanic Americans, continue to lag behind white populations.
Working
through the Indian Health Service and long-established networks of
tribally run clinics, tribes are outpacing much of the country, already
giving shots to healthy adults and eligible teenagers. Some have even
thrown open the doors to nontribal members inside their borders.
In
all, about 1.1 million vaccines have been distributed through the
Indian Health Service and 670,000 have been administered. Still, health
care advocates said frustrating gaps remained. Many Indigenous people in
big cities and areas without tribal health centers had struggled to
find vaccines.
Now, Native health
workers are desperately hoping to get through to people like Nora
Birdtail, 64, one of a shrinking number of Cherokee-speaking elders.
Their names are marked down in a leather notebook that was created to
inscribe their importance to Cherokee heritage and culture. Today, the
notebook is a register of loss — of at least 35 lives and numberless
stories cut short by the virus.
Even
as hundreds of elders got vaccinated, Ms. Birdtail resisted. She is
vulnerable to the coronavirus from a stroke. Her job as a teacher’s aide
brings her into close contact with children at the Cherokee Immersion
School, where in-person classes are expected to resume soon.
But Ms. Birdtail
is scared of getting vaccinated, largely because she once passed out
after getting a penicillin shot years ago. The government’s legacy of
medical malpractice in Indian Country — a history of coercive
treatments, shoddy care, forced sterilizations and more — has also
instilled a deep skepticism about taking a government-supported vaccine.
“It made me think back to the Trail of Tears, how they all got sick,” Ms. Birdtail said. “I don’t trust it.”
corbettreport | On November 10, 2020, Joe Biden announced the members of a
coronavirus task force that would advise his transition team on setting
COVID-19-related policies for the Biden administration. That task force
included Dr. Ezekiel Emanuel, a bioethicist and senior fellow at the
Center for American Progress.
JOE BIDEN: So that’s why today I’ve
named the COVID-19 Transition Advisory Board comprised of distinguished
public health experts to help our transition team translate the
Biden-Harris COVID-19 plan into action. A blueprint that we can put in
place as soon as Kamala and I are sworn into office on January 20th,
2021.
ANCHOR: We’ve learned that a doctor from
our area is on the president-elect’s task force. Eyewitness News
reporter Howard Monroe picks up the story.
THOMAS FARLEY: I know he’s a very bright, capable
guy and i think that’s a great choice to represent doctors in general in
addressing this epidemic.
HOWARD MONROE: Philadelphia health commissioner Dr.
Thomas Farley this morning on Eyewitness News. He praised
president-elect Joe Biden’s transition team for picking Dr. Ezekiel
Emanuel to join his coronavirus task force. He is the chair of the
Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy at the University of
Pennsylvania.
That announcement meant very little to the general public, who likely
only know Emanuel as a talking head on tv panel discussions or as the
brother of former Obama chief of staff and ex-mayor of Chicago, Rahm
Emanuel. But for those who have followed Ezekiel Emanuel’s career as a
bioethicist and his history of advocating controversial reforms of the
American health care system, his appointment was an ominous sign of
things to come.
He has argued
that the Hippocratic Oath is obsolete and that it leads to doctors
believing that they should do everything they can for their patients
rather than letting them die to focus on higher priorities. He has
argued that people should choose to die at age 75 to spare society the burden of looking after them in old age. As a health policy advisor to the Obama administration he helped craft the Affordable Care Act, which fellow Obamacare architect Jonathan Gruber admitted was only passed thanks to the stupidity of the American public.
JONATHAN GRUBER: OK? Just like the people—transparency—lack
of transparency is a huge political advantage. And basically, you know,
call it the stupidity of the American voter or whatever, but basically
that was really critical to getting the thing to pass.
During the course of the deliberations over Obamacare, the issue of
“death panels” arose. Although the term “death panel” was immediately
lampooned by government apologists in the media, the essence of the
argument was one that Emanuel has long advocated: appointing a body or
council to ration health care, effectively condemning those deemed
unworthy of medical attention to death.
ROB MASS: When I first heard about you
it was in the context of an article you wrote right around the time that
the Affordable Care Act was under consideration. And the article was
entitled “Principles for the Allocation of Scarce Medical Interventions.”
I don’t know how many of you remember there was a lot of talk at the
time about [how] this new Obamacare was going to create death panels.
And he wrote an article which I thought should have been required
reading for the entire country about how rationing medical care—you
think that that’s going to start with with the Affordable Care Act?
Medical care is rationed all the time and it must be rationed. Explain
that.
EZEKIEL EMANUEL: So there are two kinds of
“rationing,” you might say. One is absolute scarcity leading to
rationing and that’s when we don’t simply don’t have enough of something
and you have to choose between people. We do that with organs for
transplantation. We don’t have enough. Some people will get it, other
people won’t and, tragically, people will die. Similarly if we ever have
a flu pandemic—not if but when we have a flu pandemic—we’re not going
to have enough vaccine, we’re not going to have enough respirators,
we’re not going to have enough hospital beds. We’re just going to have
to choose between people.
Two more guerilla libraries in Hoboken, NJ
-
This is a follow-up to my Saturday post on guerilla libraries.
Here’s the Little Free Library located at 935 Bloomfield Ave. At that part
of town Bloomf...
A Foundation of Joy
-
Two years and I've lost count of how many times my eye has been operated
on, either beating the fuck out of the tumor, or reattaching that slippery
eel ...
April Three
-
4/3
43
When 1 = A and 26 = Z
March = 43
What day?
4 to the power of 3 is 64
64th day is March 5
My birthday
March also has 5 letters.
4 x 3 = 12
...
Return of the Magi
-
Lately, the Holy Spirit is in the air. Emotional energy is swirling out of
the earth.I can feel it bubbling up, effervescing and evaporating around
us, s...
New Travels
-
Haven’t published on the Blog in quite a while. I at least part have been
immersed in the area of writing books. My focus is on Science Fiction an
Historic...
Covid-19 Preys Upon The Elderly And The Obese
-
sciencemag | This spring, after days of flulike symptoms and fever, a man
arrived at the emergency room at the University of Vermont Medical Center.
He ...