NewYorker | When Facebook finally acknowledged that Cambridge Analytica was using
Facebook data it had obtained surreptitiously, the company’s response
was not to alert its users or audit its partners or engage in any sort
of meaningful reform. Rather, it sent a polite request to Cambridge
Analytica asking it to delete the GSR-sourced material, some of which, according to the Times, remains on the company’s servers.
This
weekend’s reports about Facebook and Cambridge Analytica did introduce
us to Christopher Wylie, a twenty-eight-year-old Canadian coder and data
scientist, who conceived and helped construct C.A.’s psychographic
tools. For at least a year, it seems, Wylie had been feeding information
to Carole Cadwalladr and her team at the Guardian and its sister paper, the Observer. Now he is out of the shadows. In a thirteen-minute video posted on the Guardian’s
Web site on Saturday, Wylie details the story of the creation and
deployment of “the weapon” that he and Nix sold to Bannon, and then to
Mercer, to fight their “culture war.” It was in those early days of
2014, Wylie says, that he and Bannon began testing slogans like “drain
the swamp” and “the deep state” and “build the wall,” and found a
surprising number of Americans who responded strongly
to them. All they needed was a candidate to parrot them. Cambridge
Analytica promised that psychographics could not only target people as
voters but also as personalities. “We would know what kind of messaging
you’d be susceptible to and where you are going to consume it and how
many times we are going to have to touch you with it to change how you
think about something,” Wylie told the Guardian. “Web sites
will be created. Blogs will be created—whatever we think this target
profile will be receptive to. See it, click it, and go down the rabbit
hole until they start to think something different.” The goal was to
break society. “It is only when you break it can you remodel the pieces
into your vision of a new society.” As one former executive of Mercer’s
hedge fund told The New Yorker’s Jane Mayer, last year, “He wants it to all fall down.”
Perhaps the most telling revelation from the recent reporting—aside from the U.K.’s Channel 4 catching Alexander Nix on camera explaining
how his company could supply beautiful Ukrainian women to entrap
politicians—is that Cambridge Analytica is essentially a shell company
created by the British firm Strategic Communications Laboratories.
During the 2016 campaign, according to Cadwalladr, C.A. was staffed
primarily by non-U.S. citizens, in possible violation of American
campaign-finance laws. This included the contractors the firm brought to
Austin, Texas, to work with Trump’s digital team there.
“We were
really speaking directly to the voters in a number of states,” one
former C.A. employee, who worked with a number of non-U.S. citizens or
green-card holders, told the Guardian.
