bellingcat | Since the April 4th 2017 chemical attack on Khan Sheikhoun a number
of individuals and organisations have attempted to promote narratives
that promote the idea that the attack was a false flag. One prominent
voice stands out among these individuals and organisations, that
of Professor Theodore A. Postol of the Massachusetts Institute of
Technology (MIT).
Professor Postol was previously known for his work with the late
Richard Lloyd on the August 21st 2013 sarin attacks in Damascus,
claiming the White House version of events was false, with Postol in
particular attempting to point the finger of blame at rebel groups. His
status at MIT has made him particularly popular with conspiracy
theorists who cite his work and credentials when promoting their false
flag theories around the attack.
With the latest attack in Khan Sheikhoun Professor Postol has
returned to the fray, publishing a series of reports claiming to show
the version of events as described by the White House is false. This has
yet again drawn much positive attention from conspiracy theorists, and
even a small amount of mainstream attention.
His latest report, generously titled “The
French Intelligence Report of April 26, 2017 Contradicts the
Allegations in the White House Intelligence Report of April 11, 2017” (mirror)
attempts to further attack the White House version of events using the
recently released French report on the Khan Sheikhoun attack. Professor
Postol states in this report that a “reading of the report
instantaneously indicates that the French Intelligence Report of April
26, 2017 directly contradicts the White House Intelligence Report of
April 11, 2017” and that “the discrepancies between these two reports
essentially result in two completely different narratives alleging nerve
agent attacks in Syria on April 11, 2017.” He concludes his
introduction to the report by stating “it raises very serious questions
that need to be investigated and reported to the American public.”
Professor Postol claims the following for his dramatic conclusion:
The French Government has released a report that totally contradicts the already dubious allegations in the WHR.
The French Report instead claims that there were at least three munitions dropped from helicopters in the town of Saraqib, more than 30 miles north of the alleged sarin release crater identified by the WHR.
The WHR claims that a fixed wing aircraft was the originator of the airdropped munition at the alleged dispersal site. The French Intelligence Report alleges that a helicopter was used to drop sarin loaded grenades at three different locations in Saraqib.
Both reports cannot simultaneously be true.
