market-ticker | I've received a few lovely pieces of "hate email" over my missives of late related to Muslim extremists and our foreign policy.
Perhaps
we should take this morning and reflect a bit on where we are, where
we're headed in this regard, and why the policies and positions taken by
our current administration, along with the ham-handed garbage coming
from the Romney campaign, are so dangerous both to us and on a global
scale.
I presume that we all know that we were "sponsors" of the
"Arab Spring", right? After years of funding and protecting the
murderous bastard Hosni Mubarak we suddenly "decided" that we'd go along
with a civilian uprising protesting (and reasonably so!) his behavior.
Ordinarily this would be an easy sale; after all, freedom is a good thing, right?
There's
only one problem -- we had been funding and arming this thug for
decades. When the crowd got a bit rowdy, as a consequence, the tear gas
cannisters that started flying had Made In The USA emblazoned on their sides. This didn't do anything for our international standing among these people, as you might imagine.
Mubarak,
for his part, didn't exactly go quietly. And who would blame him?
Up-armed and up-armored with American funds he used them -- on his own
people. It was illegal for civilians to own a rifle in Egypt, but
pistols were lawful. Soon rifle shots could be heard into the crowd;
they were coming from the police shooting from the roofs, not the citizens.
Eventually Mubarak left, but not before the people basically shut down the country.
What wasn't paid attention to was where the tinder came from to get the fire burning nice and hot -- our
own Fed and monetary policy were largely responsible by nearly doubling
the cost of food commodities in a land linked to our dollar.
Hungry people are pretty easy to gin up into a riotous mob.
You
might have thought these pressures had decreased and improved over the
last year and change. You'd be wrong. Over the last week or so an
emboldened Taliban and Al-Qaeda decided to "commemorate" the terrorist
acts of 9/11 with a bit of trouble over in the Middle East and
Afghanistan, what has been come to be known as "The Suck." You've
probably all heard of the sackings of our diplomatic missions in various
countries around the Middle East, including the forcible sodomy and
murder of one of our ambassadors. But you may have not heard much about
an audacious raid on a NATO base in Southern Afghanistan.
We
killed the attackers in the latter case, but not before they damaged or
destroyed eight Harriers, causing $200 million in damage to material and
killing two marines. This was a sophisticated assault, not the act of a
"riotous mob." Likewise, the attacks in Libya and elsewhere showed
evidence of significant planning, command and control. None
of these assaults were simple acts of an angry mob of people*****ed off
about some video; these were military operations taken against United
States soil, men and material and they were coordinated by the parties
undertaking them.
