![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh_KP1hDLatI2spSjzSPFcmPDjUaV9MztSmZfD8grwXk31bTwGjNePF7yN9at52vRX3K3Fvn5UPMeNlbwht6JCVvxhFUO9G-hVaS67_UrhnEI0M68LWUgVDrValYYdsm5R-iSIC/s400/schwarzenegger-arnold-conan-the-barbarian-3700004.jpg)
For the Republican Party, Sarah Palin has been a problem with no solution. She is a divisive figure, a culture warrior whose celebrity and command of media attention has allowed her to eclipse or bully party leaders with more appeal to independents. No one within the party has been able to put her in her place.
Until late last week, when Palin got into a media fight with Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger.
Their clash—an exchange over climate change—was brief but telling. In both style and substance, Arnold vs. Sarah offered a preview of the coming debate within the party over how the GOP might govern as it bids to return to power next year. And for mainstream Republicans who often seemed cowed by tea-party rejectionists, the contest revealed a method for neutralizing the party’s Palinists.
![](http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2009/04/07/article-1168213-0455BC18000005DC-740_468x655.jpg)
Palin prompted the exchange by launching an extended attack against climate science (she claims there’s no evidence that humans are responsible for changes) and against efforts to fight global warming (too costly, she maintains). She even called on President Obama to boycott the talks in Copenhagen.
In so doing, she stepped right into the path of Schwarzenegger, who has championed climate legislation and attended the Copenhagen talks. Some response was inevitable, and predictably, a Financial Times reporter asked the California governor about Palin’s comments.
How would Schwarzenegger answer Palin?
0 comments:
Post a Comment