CNN |President Joe Biden's
team shut down a closely-held State Department effort launched late in
the Trump administration to prove the coronavirus originated in a
Chinese lab over concerns about the quality of its work, according to
three sources familiar with the decision.
The
existence of the State Department inquiry and its termination this
spring by the Biden administration -- neither of which has been
previously reported -- comes to light amid renewed interest in whether
the virus could have leaked out
of a Wuhan lab with links to the Chinese military. The Biden
administration is also facing scrutiny of its own efforts to determine
if the Chinese government was responsible for the virus.
Those
involved in the previously undisclosed inquiry, which was launched last
fall by allies of then-Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, say it was an
honest effort to probe what many initially dismissed: that China's
biological weapons program could have had a greater role in the
pandemic's origin in Wuhan, according to two additional sources.
But
the inquiry quickly became mired in internal discord amid concerns that
it was part of a broader politicized effort by the Trump administration
to blame China and cherry-pick facts to prove a theory.
The
decision to terminate the inquiry, which was run primarily out of the
State Department's arms control and verification bureau, was made after
Biden officials were briefed on the team's draft findings in February
and March of this year, a State Department spokesperson said. Questions
were raised about the legitimacy of the findings and the project was
deemed to be an ineffective use of resources, explained a source
familiar with the decision.
Sources
involved in the Trump-era inquiry rejected criticisms over the quality
of their work and told CNN their objective had been to examine
scientific research and information from the US intelligence community
which backed the lab leak theory and shone more light on how it could
have emerged in the lab.
A
day after CNN reported this story, the State Department disputed that
it had shut down the Trump-era inquiry and instead said that its work
had been completed. Several sources involved with the inquiry who spoke
to CNN said it was their impression that there was more work to be done.
On Wednesday, Biden issued a statement
that he has directed the US intelligence community to redouble its
efforts in investigating the origins of the Covid-19 pandemic and report
back to him in 90 days.
mediaite |Russell Brand said Monday that he didn’t appreciate the way media and social-media companies suppressed news about President Joe Biden’s family, including his son, Hunter Biden, and brother, Jim Biden.
The British actor made the comment during an interview with journalist Glenn Greenwald on
his YouTube channel, but started out with a caveat. “I’m not a
pro-Republican person,” Brand said. “I don’t see myself that way. I
don’t see myself as conservative, or that I’m in a Trump, or Giuliani,
or [the] kind of media establishments that were reporting on these
revelations [about Biden’s family]. They are not my cultural, social, or
political allies. That’s certainly not how I see myself.
“However, it seems to me — what reason is Hunter Biden sat [sic] on
the board of an energy company in … Ukraine?” he added. “What reason is
James Biden sat on the board, or receiving payments from an energy
company, in China?”
Brand was referring to Hunter Biden’s 2014-19 term on the board of
Burisma Holdings, a natural-gas company with operations in Ukraine. He
and Jim Biden were also involved in a failed venture with CEFC, a
Chinese energy company. Twitter and Facebook prevented users from
sharing certain stories that touched on the dealings in the month
leading up to the 2020 election, while Twitter took the added step of suspending The New York Post’s account on the platform.
“We’re talking about sleaze, corruption, financial misdemeanors, and
relationships between corporations, big business, and politicians —
let’s face it, unless you’re bloody stupid, you know that’s going on all
the time,” Brand told Greenwald. “For me, revelations that there are
financial connections between energy companies in … Ukraine, energy
companies in China, and the Biden family are troubling. That should be
public knowledge. And it’s even more troubling that Twitter, and
Facebook and the media at large deliberately kept it out of the news
because they didn’t want it to influence the election.”
Taking a more philosophical tone — and turning his fire on the
Democratic Party — Brand added, “What is democracy then? It suggests to
me that democracy is, ‘We want you to vote for this person. We don’t
want you to vote for that person.’ As I’ve said, Donald Trump, you know,
I don’t think Donald Trump’s the answer, but I’m sad to realize that I
can no longer even claim to believe Joe Biden or the Democratic Party
might be the answer, because look at how they behave. And look at the
relationships between media, social media, and that party. They
conspired to keep information away from you because it was not
convenient to their agenda.”
thoughtco | By 1945, as the Allies were mopping up the last remnants of the Axis, it
was clear that the next great conflict would come between the
capitalist USA and the communist USSR. Some people, including Perón and
some of his advisors, predicted that World War III would break out as
soon as 1948.
In this upcoming "inevitable" conflict, third parties such as Argentina
could tip the balance one way or the other. Perón envisioned nothing
less than Argentina taking its place as a crucially important diplomatic
third party in the war, emerging as a superpower and leader of a new
world order. The Nazi war criminals and collaborators may have been
butchers, but there is no doubt that they were rabidly anti-communist.
Perón thought these men would come in useful in the "upcoming" conflict
between the USA and the USSR. As time passed and the Cold War dragged on, these Nazis would eventually be seen as the bloodthirsty dinosaurs they were.
Americans and British Didn't Want to Give Them to Communist Countries
After the war, communist regimes were created in Poland, Yugoslavia, and
other parts of Eastern Europe. These new nations requested the
extradition of many war criminals in allied prisons. A handful of them,
such as the Ustashi General Vladimir Kren, were eventually sent back,
tried, and executed. Many more were allowed to go to Argentina instead
because the Allies were reluctant to hand them over to their new
communist rivals where the outcome of their war trials would inevitably
result in their executions.
The Catholic Church also lobbied heavily in favor of these individuals
not being repatriated. The allies did not want to try these men
themselves (only 22 defendants were tried at the first of the infamous
Nuremberg Trials and all told, 199 defendants were tried of which 161
were convicted and 37 were sentenced to death), nor did they want to
send them to the communist nations that were requesting them, so they
turned a blind eye to the ratlines carrying them by the boatload to
Argentina.1
Medium |Ingrid
von Oelhafen (born in 1941) had a tough childhood. Her father Herman
von Oelhafen was often away. Her mother Gisela was emotionally distant.
Her parents sent Ingrid to the children’s home, where she grew up
without true parental love.
When
she was eleven years old, she found out that she was a foster child.
Her actual name was Erika Matko. Her father Herman and mother Gisela
were not her true parents. Her brother Dietmar was not her real brother.
When
she was fifteen, she saw a Red Cross poster with her childhood image
with the name Erika Matko on the streets of Hamburg. She realized she
was not German.
In 1999, Red Cross contacted Ingrid, asking if she wanted to learn about her true origins. She was fifty-eight years old.
Medium |ABBA
was one of the most popular music groups in history. You have probably
heard at least one of their hits. For example Waterloo, SOS, or Mamma
Mia. At the height of their popularity, ABBA earned more money than
another Swedish trademark — automobile company Volvo.
Lebensborn means Spring of life
in German. However, this word received a much more malevolent meaning
in the time of Nazi Germany. The Lebensborn program was a notorious Nazi
project, which tried to increase the Aryan population. They used
various inhumane methods, including state-sponsored breeding and
abducting of children from Nazi-occupied countries such as Poland,
Russia, and Yugoslavia.
The
ideal Aryan had blue eyes and blonde hair. The Scandinavians perfectly
fit into this requirement. The Lebensborn program encouraged German
soldiers to have relationships with Danish and Norwegian women. In
Norway only, over 12,000 children were born from such relationships.
wikipedia |Lebensborn e.V. (literally: "Fount of Life") was an SS-initiated, state-supported, registered association in Nazi Germany with the goal of raising the birth rate of Aryan children of persons classified as 'racially pure' and 'healthy' based on Nazi racial hygiene and health ideology.
Lebensborn provided welfare to its mostly unmarried mothers, encouraged
anonymous births by unmarried women at their maternity homes, and
mediated adoption of these children by likewise 'racially pure' and 'healthy' parents, particularly SS members and their families. The Cross of Honour of the German Mother
was given to the women who bore the most Aryan children. Abortion was
legalised (and, more commonly, endorsed) by the Nazis for disabled and
non-Germanic children, but strictly punished otherwise.
Initially set up in Germany in 1935, Lebensborn expanded into several occupied European countries with Germanic populations
during the Second World War. It included the selection of 'racially
worthy' orphans for adoption and care for children born from Aryan women
who had been in relationships with SS members. It originally excluded
children born from unions between common soldiers and foreign women,
because there was no proof of 'racial purity'
on both sides. During the war, many children were kidnapped from their
parents and judged by Aryan criteria for their suitability to be raised
in Lebensborn homes, and fostering by German families.
strategic-culture |The stoking of UFO controversy appears to be a classic
psyops perpetrated by U.S. military intelligence for the objective of
population control, Finian Cunningham writes.
There are reasons to be skeptical. After decades of stonewalling on
the issue, suddenly American military chiefs appear to be giving
credence to claims of UFOs invading Earth. Several viral video
clips purporting to show extraordinary flying technology have been
“confirmed” by the Pentagon as authentic. The Pentagon move is
unprecedented.
The videos of the Unidentified Flying Objects were taken by U.S. air
force flight crews or by naval surveillance and subsequently “leaked” to
the public. The question is: were the “leaks” authorized by Pentagon
spooks to stoke the public imagination of visitors from space? The
Pentagon doesn’t actually say what it believes the UFOs are, only that
the videos are “authentic”.
A Senate intelligence committee is to receive a report
from the Department of Defense’s Unidentified Aerial Phenomena (UAP)
Task Force next month. That has also raised public interest in the
possibility of alien life breaching our skies equipped with
physics-defying technology far superior to existing supersonic jets and
surveillance systems.
Several other questions come to mind that beg skepticism. Why does
the phenomenon of UFOs or UAP only seem to be associated with the
American military? This goes back decades to the speculation during the
1950s about aliens crashing at Roswell in New Mexico. Why is it that
only the American military seems privy to such strange encounters? Why
not the Russian or Chinese military which would have comparable
detection technology to the Americans but they don’t seem to have made
any public disclosures on alien encounters? Such a discrepancy is
implausible unless we believe that life-forms from lightyears away have a
fixation solely on the United States. That’s intergalactic American
“exceptionalism” for you!
Also, the alleged sightings of UFOs invariably are associated with U.S. military training grounds or high-security areas.
overcomingbias | That is, in response to any question of theory, it seems that they
say the only acceptable answer is “I don’t know”. One must not express
more refined degrees of belief, neither numerically nor in terms a more
refined partition of possibilities. Regarding various possible
hypotheses, one must not discuss their prior plausibility, the
likelihood which which each one predicts various empirical details, nor
the appropriate posterior beliefs that best combine prior plausibility
and empirical fit. Just say “I don’t know” and shut up.
(Yes, they allow an exception for expressing confidence that hoaxes,
lies, delusions, and honest mistakes don’t work as explanations. And for
giving detailed reasons for this confidence. But only those
exceptions.)
This anti-theory taboo among the “serious” who study UFOs seems to me
quite wide-spread and it has been going for a long time. You can find a
vast amount of UFO work on many particular cases, some work on patterns
across those cases, and even some work considering concrete physical
mechanisms to explain some common patterns. But you will find almost
nothing among the “serious” people on less proximate more social
explanations. They are okay with saying that UFOs often seem
intelligent, aware, and responsive, but not with discussing the goals,
agendas, origins, or histories of those intelligences.
Alas, I have seen this before, in other areas of social science. In
fields similarly dominated by empiricists who keep throwing more data
papers on the pile, but offering few rewards to those who might try to
make sense of all that data. Often because they wouldn’t like the best
explanations. It seems that UFOs is now such a field.
Apparently reports have been submitted on over 100,000 UFO encounters
worldwide in the last 75 years. Of which 5-10%, or 5K-10K, seem quite
hard to explain. Yes, the taboo may have discouraged reports on ten
times that number, and yes some governments have actively taken or
prevented some data. But the rate at which encounters allow concrete
physical samples to be collected seems to have gone way down over the
decades, and it isn’t obvious to me that we will really learn that much
more from sharper and longer pictures, videos, and radar images.
So an anti-theory taboo risks us spending another 75 years in data
collection, after which we may still not know that much more than we do
now. The point of data is to inform theory, and it still seems to me
that we now have plenty enough data, not only to judge if there is
something real, but also to do some theorizing. Yes much theorizing so
far has been motivated and/or sloppy, but honestly most of that has been
done by folks not very experience or skilled at social science theory.
Which is why it seems a shame that social theorists Wendt and Duvall
explicitly endorse the anti-theory taboo.
Well I plan tocontinue
to ignore both taboos, both the anti-UFO one and the anti-UFO-theory
one. And I invite other experienced and knowledgeable social theorists
to join me. It may be less fun at times to work on tabooed topics, but
when the taboo is unfair you can have much higher of making valuable
contributions on them. And the huge potential importance of this topic
seems obvious.
richardhanania | Imagine an alien civilization that can make it to this planet from
somewhere in the universe beyond what we can observe. Once they get
here, they are so advanced that all of our scientific knowledge leaves
us dumbfounded about how they can achieve such speed and mobility.
At the same time, these aliens keep getting caught on camera, and sometimes on radar (while humans have already invented
aircraft that largely avoids it). But the pictures are never any good!
They’re just dots in the distance that seem to move around erratically,
and despite all of our improvements in technology and camera resolution,
our pictures and videos of them never improve.
I can imagine three possibilities:
1) Aliens visit this planet and want to get caught.
2)
Aliens visit this planet and don’t care if they get caught because
they’re too advanced and physics-defying to care what we think.
3) Aliens visit this planet and don’t want to get caught.
We can rule out 1, as if they wanted to get caught they’d clearly provide much stronger evidence.
I
think we can also rule out 2, because a common theme of these sightings
is that when military cameras start to lock in on the aliens, they fly
away and disappear. If they didn’t care if we saw them, it’s likely they
would leave some more evidence behind, and not freak out when they’re
observed.
As for 3, it’s hard to imagine that a species this
advanced would be so incompetent. Intergalactic travel seems a lot
harder than avoiding radar and US military pilots. Maybe aliens are
flying around all the time, it’s just their lowest IQ pilots that keep
getting caught. But you’d think a species that advanced would have a
more meritocratic selection process for space missions.
jasoncolavito | A complicating factor that Lewis-Williams’s work creates for the UTH is
the fact that shamanic ASC and historical “abduction” experiences, cited
by Vallée and other UTH speculators, do not conform to the full
narrative of the modern UFO phenomenon, as developed after the Betty and
Barney Hill abduction claim (Fuller 1966) and J. Allen Hynek’s (1972)
classification of three types of UFO encounters, culminating with
contact. Prior to this, strange lights in the sky were not generally
found in conjunction with other staples of the narrative, such as
abduction, sexual experimentation, and cattle mutilation, a fact even
the credulous Vallée (2009) himself seemed to concede in cataloguing the
“best” evidence for prehistoric UFOs and finding no unambiguous
evidence for a complete UFO narrative prior to the modern era, only
fragments that paralleled portions of the modern narrative. This might
mean that the trans-dimensional beings first emerged into our dimension
only in 1947, 1961, or some other date, but this would not explain those
partial parallels.
I have previously traced the Hill abduction to alien encounter and
medical experimentation motifs derived from three consecutive episodes
of The Outer Limits (1964) airing over the three weeks
prior to Barney Hill’s first hypnosis session, including the
slanted-eyed aliens and their distinctive clothing, the invasive
probing, the backwoods setting, and even an interracial narrative
paralleling the Hills’ own romance (Colavito 2012).
It is noteworthy that the Hills originally only reported to Project
Bluebook seeing a flying saucer until they were placed in an altered
state of consciousness three years later and began recalling abduction
imagery exactly paralleling Outer Limits episodes
in both plot and aesthetics from the weeks before hypnosis. This origin
point for the classic abduction narrative strongly favors the PCH over
the UTH if this order of events is correct. Given that high profile
abduction cases that followed, including the Travis Walton incident, can
be shown to reproduce ideas and imagery appearing originally with the
Hill case, this again favors PCH over UTH.
Since Mizrach cited Sherlock Holmes about acceptance of the
improbable, it is only fair to mention Occam’s Razor in defense of the
idea that the hypothesis with fewer assumptions is more likely to be
correct; in this case, the proposal of an unseen and unattested
alternative dimension of reality, populated by multiple beings of
near-supernatural intelligence, who are capable of interacting with this
dimension in fixed ways across time and space is vastly more
complicated than the alternatives. The only serious support for this
claim is the contention that the UFO phenomenon encompasses physical
phenomena—such as UFOs that can be tracked on radar—that preclude a
purely mental explanation. Indeed, this is Mizrach’s primary objection
to PCH. This leads to my final question: Is the UFO phenomenon singular?
The modern UFO phenomenon is composed (roughly) of four parts: UFO
sightings, crop circles, cattle mutilation, and alien abduction.
Ufologists disagree on whether crop circles and cattle mutilation should
be considered part of the phenomenon, and alternative explanations
exist even among believers. Cattle mutilation, for example, was
traditionally ascribed down to the twentieth century to the evil power
of the goatsucker (nightjar), a (real) bird whose mythology was
reapplied to the Chupacabra, whose name (literally: goat sucker) belies
its origins (see my chapter on the Chupacabra
in Colavito 2013) and provides an equally incredible explanation for
something science recognizes as natural decay. Similarly, prior to the
modern UFO myth, lights in the sky were treated as a distinct class of
“prodigy” from nocturnal visitation by strange visitors such as incubi
and succubae, whom Vallée and Bullard both see as analogous to UFO
denizens. These visitations, however, were not associated with
spaceships or intense light, just kinky sex. Additionally, the first
reported alien encounters—those from before the Hills like George
Adamski’s—were wildly diverse, including civilized diplomatic meetings
with Nordic-looking aliens from Venus, like those of Golden Age science
fiction, as filtered through Theosophy. It is only after the 1960s that
these threads come together in the modern UFO myth.
Because we find the various elements of the UFO myth in isolation
throughout history, the logical conclusion is that the four facets of
the myth were originally separate and brought together because of
the UFO myth and the UFO phenomenon is not the cause the four facets.
In this an instructive parallel can be found in the ancient Greek myth
of giants who (a) built the massive Mycenaean ruins, (b) left behind
their gigantic bones, and (c) performed magic from their underground
tombs and rose to communicate with those who sacrificed to them. The
myth emerged from mistakes (about the origin of ruins and about the
giant bones, really those of extinct Pleistocene mammals—see Mayor
[2000]) and religious ideology, but it seemed supported by facts which
were forever after linked to the myth. In the same way, the modern UFO
myth is leading researchers down the path of proposing elaborate
explanations for a phenomenon that cannot yet be proved to require a
singular explanation.
If treating sightings, abductions, mutilations, and crop circles as
distinct events yields productive explanations for each (as skeptics
contend), then the UFO phenomenon as a whole may be considered as a
modern myth and the UTH can be discarded as redundant, though as with
phlogiston and unicorns, it cannot be conclusively proven wrong, only
unnecessary. This then frees the researcher to examine multiple causes
for various phenomena, from ASC for most abduction cases to a wide range
of events that yield lights in the sky. By discarding the strictures of
forcing all of the factors of contemporary UFO mythology to conform to a
single hypothesis, the truth may in fact emerge more fully and
brilliantly than ufologists suspect.
greyfalcon |September
30 marks the birthday of this strange but remarkable woman, who
probably did the most to spread the "Hitler escaped in a UFO" legend.
Her
name was Maximiani Portas, but she's better known to history by her nom
de voyage, the name she traveled under...Savitri Devi.
Maximiani was born in Lyons, France's second largest city, on September 30, 1905. "Her mother, Julia Nash, came from Cornwall, and her father was of mixed Mediterranean heritage, having an Italian mother from London and a Greek father who had acquired French citizenship due to his residence in France."
As a schoolgirl, Maximiani was greatly influenced by the work of the French poet Leconte de Lisle, whose Poemes barbares glorified the gods and religions of antiquity. And when she dicovered Bullfinch's Mythology, the result was the same as with H.P. Lovecraft a decade earlier. She became an ardent believer in the gods of Olympus.
But where Lovecraft soon ended his infatuation with Graeco-Roman
religion, the topic became a lifelong obsession with Maximiani.
In 1929, now interested in tracing the roots of occult traditions, Maximiani traveled to Jerusalem.
She arrived just in time for the riots between the Arabs and the
growing numbers of Jewish immigrants. She sided with the Arabs, and the
entire episode left her with a lifelong hatred of Jews, Judaism, Zionism
and the Talmud. [Some occultists believe that there is a network of ancient tunnels under the TempleMount in Jerusalem, similar to the tunnels in the Andes. These tunnels are alleged to be left over from the lost continent of Atlantis. See the book Timeless Earth by Peter Kolosimo, University Books, 1974]
By 1932, Maximiani's quest had brought her to India.
Here she came under the influence of Bal Gangadhar Tilak (1856-1920),
also known as Sri Baba Lokmanya, who was widely acclaimed as the 'father
of Indian unrest'. Besides his radical political activities, Tilak was
an accomplished scholar of ancient Hindu sacred literature. Imprisoned
by the British Raj in 1897 for sedition, Tilak had immersed himself in
Vedic study and in 1903 published his book about the origins of the
"Aryan race," The Arctic Home in the Vedas.
Maximiani wandered through India for three years. Then, in July 1935, she enrolled in Rabindranath Tagore's ashram in Shantiniketan in the Bolpur district.But she left in December after getting into scraps with German Jewish refugees who were also the guests of Tagore.
At the ashram, she "learned Hindi and perfected her command of Bengali. She then taught English and Indian history at JerandanCollege, not far from Delhi, and worked in a similar capacity in Mathura, the holy city of Krishna, during 1936. Ever more involved in the life and customs of Hinduism, she adopted a Hindu name--Savitri Devi."
Settling in Calcutta
in 1936, Savitri came under the influence of Srimat Swami Satyananda,
who was director of the city's Hindu Mission and active in the
nationalist Hindu Mahasabha movement. Tilak had gotten it wrong,
Satyananda told Savitri, the Aryans didn't originate in the Arctic--they came from the Antarctic. During previous interglacial periods, Antarctica had enjoyed a temperate climate, and there were still ancient cities buried under the ice and snow. [Curiously, Lovecraft wrote a short novel about this topic in 1932 entitled At the Mountains of Madness, repeatedly referring to a city called "Kadath in the Cold Waste"].
More
ominously, Satyananda told Savitri that the presence of the swastika,
the traditional Hindu sign of good fortune, in the flag of Nazi Germany
showed that this European nation was returning to its Aryan roots. In
addition, "he told her that he considered Hitler an incarnation of
Vishnu, an expression of the force preserving cosmic order."
Satyananda and his new guest lecturer, Savitri Devi, were very much excited when Hitler dispatched an expedition to Antarctica in 1938 under Captain Alfred Rischer. Here was proof that the Nazis were seeking the ancient Aryan homeland. [In 1916, Charles Fort wrote a book called Y in
which he talked about buried cities at the South Pole. He inexplicably
destroyed this manuscript in 1917, claiming that "it was not what I
wanted." Whatever Antarctic oddities the old boy dug up are delightful
to conjecture but are unfortunately lost to history].
Friends in the Mahasabha introduced Savitri to Asit Krishna Mukherji, the editor of The New Mercury, India's
one-and-only National Socialist magazine until its suppression by the
British authorities in 1937. "Mukherji admired the growing might and
influence of the Third Reich. He was deeply impressed by the Aryan
ideology of Nazi Germany, with its cult of Nordic racial superiority,
anti-Semitism and race laws," which he compared favorably with the Vedic
law of varna or caste.
When
World War II broke out in September 1939, Savitri and Mukherji became
the biggest pro-Axis cheerleaders around. Which immediately got Savitri
into trouble with the Raj. For one thing, she was a citizen of France and needed a permit to stay in India. Her pro-Nazi views put her on a list for deportation. And when the Germans overran France in May 1940, she was in imminent danger of arrest as "an enemy alien."
So, on June 9, 1940, at the age of 34, Savitri married Mukherji in Calcutta. It was a traditional Hindu wedding.
While
her husband worked for Indian independence under the pro-Axis leader,
Subhas Chandra Bose, Savitri "spent the rest of the war in joyful
anticipation of an Axis victory. By the end of the war, Savitri Devi had
assimilated many notions from Hinduism into a heterodox form of
National Socialism that glorified the Aryan race and Adolf Hitler.
Undeterred by the Allied victory in May 1945, Savitri resolved to return to Europe and preach her new Hitlerian faith. What spurred her to action was a curious article that appeared in The Times and Le Monde on July 18, 1945 claiming that Hitler and his new wife, Eva Braun, had been taken by a U-boat to Argentina.
Convinced that der Führer would soon be making his comeback, "Savitri Devi returned to Europe in October 1945. In London she took casual employment as a wardrobe manager with a traveling Indian dance company."
During her brief showbiz career, Savitri read another article that appeared in the Argentinian newspaper Critica on July 17, 1945 which "stated that the Führer and Eva Braun had landed from the U-530 in Antarctica, noting the possible place of embarkation was Queen Maud Land, the destination of a German Antarctic expedition in 1938-1939."
She also read a book by Ladislao Szabo, a Hungarian living in Buenos Aires, entitled Hitler esta vivo (Hitler is alive) Szabo expanded on the Critica article and discussed the top-secret but abortive Operation High Jump.
But
what really kindled Savitri's excitement was the sudden appearance of
the "flying saucers" in July 1947. UFOs dominated front pages
everywhere.
Ready to undertake her missionary work, Savitri hit upon the idea of distributing pro-Nazi leaflets while passing through Germany by train in June 1948.
Returning through France and entering Germany at Saarholzbach, she spent some three months between 7 September and 6 December 1948 distributing a further six thousand leaflets in the three Western (Allied) occupation zones and the Saarland.
The
V-7 was a futuristic aircraft, Savitri was told, 'a fantastic creation
nearly 15 meters (50 feet) in diameter, in its center the plexiglass
cupola of the control room glistening in the sunlight.'...it had no
rotating parts and was driven by twelve adjustable jets, five rearward
for forward flight and the other seven for directional steering. With a
range of 13,000 miles (20,000 kilometers) the V-7 was able to reach
1,500 to 2,000 miles per hour (2,400 to 3,200 kilometers per hour).
Soon
it was all coming together in her mind--Hitler's controversial demise,
the Antarctic expedition of 1938, the Miethe V-7 flying disk, the SS
rumors of a diehard "Last Battalion" preparing to resume the war. She
truly believed that a flying saucer had spirited the Führer out of an
embattled Berlin and dropped him off in Cuxhaven. From there, the U-boat convoy ferried him to the Nazi colony of Neuschwabenland in Antarctica.
Thus
convinced, Savitri undertook her most dangerous gamble yet. In
preparation for her third propaganda sortie to enemy-occupied Germany, she had printed in London
a small German-language handbill with a swastika. Here she exhorted the
Germans to remain true to their Führer, who was alleged still to be
alive, and to rise up against the Allied forces that now were stationed
throughout the country.
In part, the handbill read,
"However, 'Slavery is to last but a short time more.'"
"Our Führer is alive."
"And will soon come back, with power unheard of."
"Resist our persecutors."
"Hope and wait."
She began distributing the handbill on the night of 13-14 February 1949 in Cologne and soon found a young ex-SS man to help her.
The
Allied occupation officials were at first alarmed by the appearance of
these handbills. Was there a clandestine neo-Nazi group out there
actually agitating for revolution? But then a German informer told them
that a certain Mrs. Mukherji was distributing the subversive leaflets.
And on February 22, 1949, Savitri was arrested by the British Army.
She was detained at the British military prison for women at Werl until her formal trial, which was fixed for 5 April 1949.
No
doubt about it, Savitri was in a heap of trouble. As part of the
postwar "denazification" program, the Allies had proclaimed the Laws of
Occupation Status n Germany.
Article 7 of Law Number 8 "forbade the promotion of militarist and
National Socialist ideas on German territory subject to the Allied
Control Commission." The maximum penalty was death.
Instead,
the Allied court-martial sentenced Savitri to three years at the prison
in Werl. She struck up close friendships with former SS concentration
camp guards from Belsen and began writing her book Defiance.
Here she enjoyed a high regard among her fellow Nazi and SS prisoners
for her high-flown rhetoric, her insistence on the idealistic philosophy
of Aryan rebirth, and her pious Nazi spirituality. Her presence proved
so disruptive that Savitri was soon placed in solitary.
Just
as Savitri was looking at an extended stay at Werl, the husband she had
abandoned four years earlier came to her rescue. Asit Krishna Mukherji,
now a citizen of newly-independent India, arrived in Germany and lobbied the Allied occupation authorities for his wife's release.
In the end, Mukherji was successful, and Savitri was released from prison in August 1949.
For
the rest of her life, Savitri continued her mission as a Nazi
evangelist, writing several books and helping to found the World Union
of National Socialists. She also insisted that some UFOs were indeed
craft from the Nazi sanctuary in Antarctica, a theme that her colleage and disciple Ernst R. Zundel expanded upon in his 1974 book, UFOs: Nazi Secret Weapons?
Savitri Devi died on October 22, 1982.
Although
her main contribution to ufology was the promotion of the "saucer
Nazis" legend, there is one curious postscript concerning Savitri Devi.
On April 5, 1949, at the same moment Savitri was facing the Allied court-martial in Germany, a spectacular UFO event occurred thousands of miles to the west, over that part of the USA's New England region Loren Coleman calls "the Bridgewater Triangle."
A "very large, luminous, blue-green object" first appeared over Middleboro, Massachusetts, then flew a wobbly corkscrew course westward over Taunton, Rehoboth and Seekonk, Mass. and finally over H.P. Lovecraft's hometown of Providence, Rhode Island, where it suddenly and inexplicably vanished. The sighting was reported in Doubt--The Fortean Society Magazine for October 1949.
jasoncolavito | Why it is that aliens
want to probe our butts; or, more specifically, when exactly did people
start claiming that aliens gave them anal probes? I know this is a
silly question, but silly questions often end up revealing hidden layers
and secrets. And I have not been able to find a satisfactory answer to
what should have been a simple question.
Anal
probes are now such an established part of the UFO phenomenon that
you’d think there’d be a clear answer to that question, but if there is,
I can’t find one. Many UFO books refer to it, and
many assume that it’s just a given during an abduction, but I can’t find
a catalog of anal probing events or a timeline of when they supposedly
started. Even the otherwise exhaustive Wikipedia lacks an entry for
alien anal probes. There must be something about it somewhere, but since
I am not as familiar with modern UFO material, I am not sure where to
look for it.
Ufology isn’t much help in the matter. In his A UFO Hunter’s Guide (2012),
Brad Lueder simply denies that there were any anal probes, dismissing
the formulation as “misinterpreted and misunderstood” sex experiments.
He’s wrong, of course, but it shows that some ufologists want to
distance themselves from what Lueder calls the “sneers and jokes” of
“modern popular culture.” On the other hand, Zen Benefiel self-published
a book this year called Alien Agendas and Anal Probes that promised to investigate “the science behind the anal probes” and what these probes can tell us about why the aliens are really here. But his book isn’t a history so much as New Age-influenced fringe speculation.
We can probably put a terminus ante quem and terminus pro quem on our search by establishing that the trope was famous enough in 1997 to be the subject of South Park’s
pilot episode, “Cartman Gets an Anal Probe.” The probing can’t be part
of the abduction experience before there was an abduction experience, so
it had to have developed after 1964, when under hypnosis Betty and
Barney Hill claimed to have been subjected to surgical examination
(Betty claimed a needle entered her naval) during a 1961 alien
abduction. Or at least it would have developed after 1962, when claims
that Antonio Vilas-Boas had been seduced into sex by an alien following a
medical examination on a spaceship in 1957 were first published.
The interesting thing is that Barney Hill actually did claim to be anally probed, but because that claim was not included in The Interrupted Journey
(1965), the account by John G. Fuller of the hypnotic regression he
performed on the Hills, this claim was not generally known until a 1965 report by NICAP investigator Walter Webb
was popularized much later. In that report, Webb stated that during the
hypnotic regression, Barney Hill stated that “A cylindrical object
was inserted up the rectum, and once again the witness believed
something was extracted.” Fuller left this out of the book, along with a
claim by Hill that a cup was used to extract sperm. Originally posted December 10, 2014
The United States is no less vulnerable than Britain and France to threats to security and air safety. The United States Air Force or the National Aeronautics and Space Administration should reopen investigations of U.F.O. phenomena. It would not imply that the country has suddenly started believing in little green men. It would simply recognize the possibility that radar alone cannot always tell us what’s out there.
A healthy skepticism about extraterrestrial space travelers leads people to disregard U.F.O. sightings without a moment’s thought. But in the United States, this translates into overdependence on radar data and indifference to all kinds of unidentified aircraft — a weakness that could be exploited by terrorists or anyone seeking to engage in espionage against the United States.
The American government has not investigated U.F.O. sightings since 1969, when the Air Force ended Project Blue Book, an effort to scientifically analyze all sightings to see if any posed a threat to national security. Britain and France, in contrast, continue to investigate U.F.O. sightings, because of concerns that some sightings might be attributable to foreign military aircraft breaching their airspace, or to foreign space-based systems of interest to the intelligence community.
I love these articles. To me, they're like tchotchkys of the collective unconscious. I expect we'll be seeing lots more such bon mots in the weeks and months to come as the perfect storm afflicting the economy and the American body politic gathers strength. The American political theater will prove jarringly impotent in dealing with the encompassing reality corrections - so it's time once again to inject a little mystery and awe into the otherwise steady diet of bread and circuses...., Originally posted August 2, 2008.
Though UFO abductions do appear to be an international phenomenon, the lion's share of cases seem to come from Anglo-Saxon-rooted countries like the United States, England, South Africa, and Australia. Interestingly, all of these countries face race problems - whether it be with Aborigines, African-Americans, Zulu and Xhosa, or Caribbean blacks from the commonwealth. In the Third World, many people from these First World countries commonly encounter "organ removal" panics. Rumors have spread like wildfire that Americans in Guatemala are kidnapping small children and "harvesting" their organs for transplants. The similarity between these panics and UFO abductions should also be fairly obvious....
The connection between the UFO phenomenon itself (long before the current wave of abductions) and race is curious and bizarre. Many of the first group of UFO "contactees" - who went aboard the flying saucers willingly, to make love to gorgeous Venusians (but never producing offspring) - were loosely affiliated with the "Silver Shirt" movement of the 30s and 40s, a sort of homegrown American fascism which, among other things, opposed Roosevelt and WW II. The 50s contactees seemed to report that the majority of the saucer pilots were "Aryans" - long-haired, blonde, tall beings from Venus or other planets in the solar system. The "Aryans," when not warning humanity about atomic war, often gave messages promoting race harmony, but softly warning against racial intermixture and the "population explosion" of the Third World masses...
What ever became of the New World Order eruptions of the early 90's? Do you remember the vast conspiracy imaginings associated with pre-Katrina FEMA? Oklahoma City, Waco, Black Helicopters, etc.., etc.., etc..? Whatever became of all those folks now that they've had eight years of rule by the other side of the governance duopoly? Originally posted March 29, 2008.
hopenothate | The Order of Nine Angles is a Nazi-Satanist “group” (or Nazi Occult
as they prefer to describe themselves) that promotes a supernatural,
hateful system of thought which condemns liberal, Judeo-Christian
society and longs for a new imperial age created by a ludicrous
sub-Nietzschean superman figure called ‘Vindex.’ Ultimately, the O9A
elite aspires to colonise the solar system.
The racist order deifies Hitler and the Third Reich, which are
regarded as having attempted to create a “Satanic empire” in order to
achieve the destiny of the western world.
Much of the O9A writings and activities appear on the surface quite comical. The chanting, the dressing up, the rituals.
The Mass of Heresy, contained within the ONA’s Black Book of Satan,
is performed before an altar adorned with a swastika banner, a framed
photograph of Hitler and a copy of Mein Kampf. With black candles and
incense of Mars burning, the congregation, dressed in black robes,
chant:
We believe Adolf Hitler was sent by our gods To guide us to greatness. We believe in the inequality of the races
And in the right of the Aryans to live According to the laws of the folk.
In The Ceremony of Recalling, the Preistess blindfolds the Priest and
takes him to each member of the congregation who kiss him. After being
lifted on an alter containing “red candles and quartz tetrahedron”, the
Priest has his robe removed by the Priestess as the others walk around
him. After performing a sexual act on the Priest, the Priestess removes
the robes of the congregation. Meanwhile, the Mistress, dressed in a
white robe, “takes the person she has chosen and indulges herself
according to her desire. The congregation consume the consecrated cakes
[made from wheat, water, egg, honey, animal fat and marijuana] and wine
and take their own pleasures according to their desires.” The ceremony
ends with the killing of a chosen one; in a symbolic sacrifice, an
animal replaces a person. On the next new moon, the congregation consume
cakes containing the sacrificial victim’s blood.
But
behind the fantasy and roleplay lies a very sinister organisation which
has the potential to inspire their followers to commit extreme acts of
violence.
The O9A believes civilisation must be undermined and destroyed from
within, so adherents are encouraged to be as grubby and horrible as they
like – committing crimes, random acts of violence, sexual assaults, and
even the “culling” of human victims.
The three volumes of The Black Book of Satan are considered so
extreme that they are kept is a special section of the British Library
and not available to the general public. There is repeated talk of
“culling”, committing acts of violence and destabilisation and even
terrorism. In the The Dreccian Way, an O9A training manual written by
leader Richard Moult, followers are encouraged not just to commit crime,
but to “spread it, encourage it, incite it, support it”.
O9A
literature regularly advocates ritualised rape, random attacks on
innocent victims and “human culling”. The Black Book of Satan volume 3
describes how the Spring Equinox should be celebrated by a human
sacrifice of somebody who volunteers for the role by their bad deeds,
which, it suggests, could be “a Nazarene, such as an interfering
investigative journalist.”
“Culling is natural and necessary,” wrote Moult in The Dreccian Way.
“To cull humans is to be the ONA. To cull – according to our guildlines
and tests – is what makes us ONA.”
-
*Kwanzaa 2025 Umoja Message *
2025 | Annual Kwanzaa Theme: "Practicing the Seven Principles in Dimly-Lit
Times: Lifting Up the Light, Hurrying the Dawn"...
The computer scientist and the engineer look at AI
-
Half baked thought:
In discussions about AI, claims are often made about both capabilities and
societal effects, and in practice the boundary is pretty ...
Free To A Good Home
-
I know what gooning is same as I know what felching is but I don't care to
remind myself all that often about it. The Internet just keeps exposing the
ni...
If Free Will Is False, Destiny Is True
-
Free will is like God: perhaps dead, its absence having something to say
about morality (what Nietzsche meant by “Gott ist tot” was that the
Christian God ...
FREE BOOK: On Nonviolence
-
“Michael Barker’s interrogation of nonviolent protest tactics and regime
change is both timely and important. Drawing on cases ranging from American
democr...
Return of the Magi
-
Lately, the Holy Spirit is in the air. Emotional energy is swirling out of
the earth.I can feel it bubbling up, effervescing and evaporating around
us, s...
Covid-19 Preys Upon The Elderly And The Obese
-
sciencemag | This spring, after days of flulike symptoms and fever, a man
arrived at the emergency room at the University of Vermont Medical Center.
He ...
-
(Damn, has it been THAT long? I don't even know which prompts to use to
post this)
SeeNew
Can't get on your site because you've gone 'invite only'?
Man, ...
First Member of Chumph Cartel Goes to Jail
-
With the profligate racism of the Chumph Cartel, I don’t imagine any of
them convicted and jailed is going to do too much better than your run of
the mill ...