theatlantic | Last week, Larry Moneta, Duke’s vice
president of student affairs, stopped into his regular coffee shop in
the student center, Joe Van Gogh, for a hot tea and a vegan muffin. The
business was streaming music on Spotify, per usual, and as the
university administrator stood waiting in line, “Get Paid” by Young Dolph happened to be playing. Its endlessly repeated refrain is “Get paid, young nigga, get paid.”
Britni Brown, who was manning the register, was in charge of the
playlist that day... Moneta, a white man, told Brown, an
African-American woman, that the song was inappropriate. “The words,
‘I’ll eff you upside down,’ are inappropriate,” Moneta said, according
to Brown. (Those exact lyrics are not in the song, though it has plenty of f-bombs.)
“Yes, of course,” Brown said. She says she shut the song off
immediately. She grabbed him a vegan muffin and offered it free of
charge. “No,” Brown recalls Moneta saying. “Ring me up for it.” Brown
says she offered again, apologizing for the offense the song had caused.
“You need me to ring me up for it right now,” Moneta insisted.
...Kevin Simmons, the other barista on duty, was busy making drinks.
Simmons had worked there for three months and was up for his ninety-day
review the next week. While pulling shots of espresso, he noticed a man
who was upset with Brown. “Harassing is definitely the word I
would use,” Simmons says. “He was verbally harassing her.” Simmons did
not hear what Moneta or Brown said specifically, but he noticed Brown
hastily turning off the music and apologizing profusely.
If that’s where the matter ended, this would be the sort
of story that happens all the time in the United States but is seldom
discussed: a patron feels righteously entitled in interaction with
low-wage service worker, lashing out in a manner that is needlessly
harsh and glaringly uncharitable, while the low-wage service worker is
unfailingly polite and doing her level-best to be accommodating.
But that is not where it ended.
Instead, Moneta, a college administrator playing to type, escalated the matter
by needlessly injecting it into his institution’s bureaucracy. If
you’ve been wondering what Duke’s burgeoning numbers of administrators
do all day, here’s a look at a priority two chose: Moneta called Robert
Coffey, Duke’s director of dining services, telling him that while at a
coffee shop that contracts with the university, he heard an
inappropriate song playing.
So the head of dining services called
Robbie Roberts, the owner of Joe Van Gogh, who relies on income from
Duke University. Now back to the alt-weekly, which somehow got audio of
the meeting between the two baristas who were there during the incident
and Joe Van Gogh’s human-resources manager:
In the United States, African-American and Hispanic children in
predominantly white school districts are classified as “learning
disabled” more often than whites. This leads to millions of minority
children being hooked onto prescribed mind-altering drugs—some more
potent than cocaine—to “treat” this “mental disorder.” And yet, with
early reading instruction, the number of students so classified could be
reduced by up to 70 percent.
African-Americans and Hispanics are also significantly over-represented in US prisons.
In Britain, black men are ten times more likely than white men to be
diagnosed as “schizophrenic,” and more likely to be prescribed and given
higher doses of powerful psychotropic (mind-altering) drugs. They are
also more likely to receive electroshock treatment (over 400 volts of
electricity sent searing through the brain to control or alter a
person’s behavior) and to be subjected to physical and chemical
restraints.
Around the world, racial minority groups continue to come under
assault. The effects are obvious: poverty, broken families, ruined
youth, and even genocide (deliberate destruction of a race or culture).
No matter how loud the pleadings or sincere the efforts of our religious
leaders, our politicians and our teachers, racism just seems to
persist.
Yes, racism persists. But why? Rather than struggle unsuccessfully
with the answer to this question, there is a better question to ask.
Who?
The truth is we will not fully understand racism until we recognize
that two largely unsuspected groups are actively and deceptively
fostering racism throughout the world. The legacy of these groups
includes such large-scale tragedies as the Nazi Holocaust, South
Africa’s apartheid and today, the widespread disabling of millions of
schoolchildren with harmful, addictive drugs. These groups are
psychiatry and psychology.
In 1983, a World Health Organization report stated, “…in no other
medical field in South Africa is the contempt of the person, cultivated
by racism, more concisely portrayed than in psychiatry.”
Professor of Community Psychiatry, Dr. S. P. Sashidharan, stated,
“Psychiatry comes closest to the police…in pursuing practices and
procedures that…discriminate against minority ethnic groups in the
United Kingdom.”
Dr. Karen Wren and Professor Paul Boyle of the University of St.
Andrews, Scotland, concluded that the role of scientific racism in
psychiatry throughout Europe is well established historically and
continues today.
Since 1969, CCHR has worked in the field of human rights and mental
health reform, and has investigated the racist influence of the “mental
health” professions on the Nazi Holocaust, apartheid, the cultural
assault of the Australian Aboriginal people, New Zealand Maoris and
Native American Indians, and the current discrimination against Blacks
across the world.
Psychiatry and psychology’s racist ideologies continue to light the fires of racism locally and internationally to this day.
This report is designed to raise awareness among individuals about
this harmful influence. Not only can racism be defeated, but it must be,
if man is to live in true harmony.
APNews | For more than two years, a U.S. agency secretly infiltrated Cuba’s
underground hip-hop movement, recruiting unwitting rappers to spark a
youth movement against the government, according to documents obtained
by The Associated Press.
The idea was to use Cuban musicians “to
break the information blockade” and build a network of young people
seeking “social change,” documents show. But the operation was
amateurish and profoundly unsuccessful.
On at least six occasions,
Cuban authorities detained or interrogated people involved in the
program; they also confiscated computer hardware, and in some cases it
contained information that jeopardized Cubans who likely had no idea
they were caught up in a clandestine U.S. operation. Still, contractors
working for the U.S. Agency for International Development kept putting
themselves and their targets at risk, the AP investigation found.
They
also ended up compromising Cuba’s vibrant hip-hop culture — which has
produced some of the hardest-hitting grassroots criticism since Fidel
Castro came to power in 1959. Artists that USAID contractors tried to
promote left the country or stopped performing after pressure from the
Cuban government, and one of the island’s most popular independent music
festivals was taken over after officials linked it to USAID.
The
program is laid out in documents involving Creative Associates
International, a Washington, D.C., contractor paid millions of dollars
to undermine Cuba’s communist government. The thousands of pages include
contracts, emails, preserved chats, budgets, expense reports, power
points, photographs and passports.
The work included the creation
of a “Cuban Twitter” social network and the dispatch of inexperienced
Latin American youth to recruit activists, operations that were the
focus of previous AP stories.
“Any assertions that our work is
secret or covert are simply false,” USAID said in a statement Wednesday.
Its programs were aimed at strengthening civil society “often in places
where civic engagement is suppressed and where people are harassed,
arrested, subjected to physical harm or worse.”
Creative Associates did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
NYMag | We now live in a world where the attorney general going out to dinner
with two top Justice Department officials is not only news, but a sign
that he’s rebelling against the president. As a senator, Jeff Sessions
was one of Donald Trump’s earliest supporters, and he served as one of
his campaign’s top foreign-policy advisers. But the seeds of the
attorney general’s rift with the president were planted during his
confirmation hearing, when he offered up some thoughts about Russia
collusion that turned out to be not entirely accurate. Here’s how the
Trump-Sessions relationship devolved to the point that two 71-year-old
lawmakers are barely speaking, lobbing insults on Twitter, and sending
passive-aggressive messages with their choice of dinner companion.
Sessions’s Russia Contacts Are Revealed
Exactly one year ago, President Trump was basking
in the unusually positive reviews from his first address to Congress.
The very next day, we learned that Sessions met with Russian
ambassador Sergey Kislyak at least twice while working with the Trump campaign — yet during his confirmation hearing he denied, under oath, having any such contacts.
“I’m
not aware of any of those activities,” Sessions said of Trump
officials’ Russia contacts, “I have been called a surrogate at a time or
two in that campaign and I did not have communications with the
Russians.”
extranewsfeed | As the
feudal power-structures of Europe broke down beneath a wave of
revolutions in the 18th century, governments took a more active role in
law enforcement and the first centralized policing organization was created in France
by King Louis XIV. The duties of the new police were bluntly described
as a mechanism of class-control over workers and peasants:
“ensuring
the peace and quiet of the public and of private individuals, purging
the city of what may cause disturbances, procuring abundance, and having each and everyone live according to their station and their duties”
While France’s Gendarmes were seen as a symbol of oppression in other parts of Europe, the French policing model spread during the early 1800s as Napoleon Bonaparte conquered much of the continent. By the mid-1800s, modern policing institutions — publicly-funded, centralized police organized in a military hierarchy and under the control of the state — had been transplanted everywhere from Tsarist Russia to England and the United States.
Policing became the exclusive right of governments as other law
enforcement groups were absorbed into new and “official” institutions.
The new police were not just tasked with serving the public,
however — they also protected the political power of their new
employers. It was a revolutionary era and the new police were shaped by
rulers facing a particularly mutinous population. The use of police as
the vanguard of state-power was a major development and it was adapted
to repress popular movements all over the world. Early police organizations in the US,
for example, pretty much handed blue uniforms to former slave-patrols
and anti-union mercenaries who had historically protected the interests
of plantation-bosses in the South and industrial capitalists in the
North.
Counterpunch | I wrote an Op-Ed for The Washington Post[1]about
the Thomas Hill case in which Thomas was accused of accosting Anita
Hill with ugly sexist language. I suggested that it would be a boon for
corporate feminists who had co-opted the feminist movement. Instead of
exposing the hands-on assaults against them by their employers upon whom
they depended for their prosperity, they could blame Black guys for
sexism in the workplace. It was Maureen Dowd who pointed to the
hypocrisy of some of Hill’s White feminist supporters. When Bill
Clinton’s hands-on sexism came to light, she noted that some of those
liberal and progressive feminists who condemned Clarence Thomas defended
Clinton’s offenses against women.
Clarence Thomas has been ridiculed for years for pleading that he was
subjected to a “hi-tech lynching.” But now that powerful corporate
White men, among them predators, who, for decades, have been shielded by
corporate feminists, their defenders are insisting upon due process,
which is what Thomas was demanding. To cross examine his accusers.
Timesman Bret Stephens complains about hi-tech lynchings now that the
shoe is on the other foot and outfits like NPR, The New Republic, MSNBC, The New York Times
and other media outlets, which have competed for revenue from what
could be called “The Black Boogeyman” racket, have uncovered predators
among their personnel. Now that they’re feeling the heat from feminists
they’ve come up with something called “a spectrum of behavior.”
In the Post article, I also pointed out that regardless of
Thomas’s right-wing views, in the Anita Hill vs. Thomas case, Blacks
supported Thomas. White progressives didn’t pay attention to this fact.
For them, Blacks are to be interpreted. Not listened too. Maybe they
agree with Jeffrey Toobin, who has made a fortune from a slipshod
examination of the Simpson case. Toobin says that Blacks can’t deal with
reality and shouldn’t be patted on the head,[4] like the reward that a dog receives after retrieving a ball for his owner.
endgadget | The new replay tools offered in PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
are so much more than standard video-capture technology. In fact, it
isn't video capture at all -- it's data capture. The 3D replay tools
allow players to zoom around the map after a match, tracking their own
character, following enemies' movements, slowing down time and setting
up cinematic shots of their favorite kills, all within a 1-kilometer
radius of their avatar. It's filled with statistics, fresh perspectives
and infinite data points to dissect. This isn't just a visual replay;
it's a slice of the actual game, perfectly preserved, inviting
combatants to play God.
PUBG is an ideal test case. It's a massively popular online
game where up to 100 players parachute onto a map, scavenge for
supplies, upgrade weapons and attempt to be the last person standing.
Even though it technically came out in December, PUBG has been
available in early access since March and it's picked up a considerable
number of accolades -- and players -- in the process. Just last week, SteamDB reported PUBG hit 3 million concurrent players on PC, vastly outstripping its closest competitor, Dota 2, which has a record of 1.29 million simultaneous players.
Part of PUBG's
success stems from developers' relentless focus on making the game fun
to watch. Live streaming is now a major part of the video-game world,
with sites like Twitch and YouTube Gaming growing in prominence and
eSports bursting into the mainstream.
Kim says PUBG
creator Brendan Greene and CEO Chang Han Kim built the idea of
data-capture into the game from the beginning, and Minkonet's tech is a
natural evolution of this focus. Minkonet and PUBG developers connected in late 2016 and started working together on the actual software earlier this year.
"One of their first visions was to have PUBG
as not just a great game to play, but a great game to watch," Kim says.
"So they were already from the very beginning focused on having PUBG as a great live streaming game; esports was also one of their sort of long-term visions."
Buchanan | The original question the FBI investigation of the Trump campaign was to answer was a simple one: Did he do it?
Did Trump, or officials with his knowledge, collude with Vladimir
Putin’s Russia to hack the emails of John Podesta and the DNC, and leak
the contents to damage Hillary Clinton and elect Donald Trump?
A year and a half into the investigation, and, still, no “collusion”
has been found. Yet the investigation goes on, at the demand of the
never-Trump media and Beltway establishment.
Hence, and understandably, suspicions have arisen.
Are the investigators after the truth, or are they after Trump?
Set aside the Trump-Putin conspiracy theory momentarily, and consider a rival explanation for what is going down here:
That, from the outset, Director James Comey and an FBI camarilla were
determined to stop Trump and elect Hillary Clinton. Having failed, they
conspired to break Trump’s presidency, overturn his mandate and bring
him down.
Essential to any such project was first to block any indictment of
Hillary for transmitting national security secrets over her private
email server.
It is tempting to think that an institution like the F.B.I. enjoys such
credibility and public support that its agents and officials—and Mueller
himself—can rely on cross-party backing in a crisis, even if Republicans
remain silent now. Perhaps. But this was a party that refused to
challenge Trump’s backing of Roy Moore in Alabama’s Senate race. And an
understanding of what core Trump supporters believe about the F.B.I. and
Mueller has to take into account Gallup’s trend lines. While celebrating
this new year, it will require a certain degree of evidence-light
optimism to be convinced that the center will hold.
Like I said a month ago, it'll never reach up to snatch down a real baller - and by that exact same token - it'll never bend down to ease the working and living conditions of peasant women, either.
theatlantic | The man who Sandra Pezqueda says
sexually harassed her and ultimately got her fired has never been
disciplined for his actions. That’s even though the man, who was her
boss when she worked as a dishwasher and chef’s assistant at the
luxurious Terrenea Resort in Rancho Palos Verdes, California, beginning
in 2015, persistently switched her schedule so she’d be working alone
near him, repeatedly offered to give her more hours if she’d go out with
him, and twice tried to kiss her in a storeroom at work, according to
Pezqueda. That’s even though, when she complained about his behavior to
the staffing agency that employed them both, Pezqueda says supervisors
began seeking reasons to fire her, eventually letting her go in February
2016. “I knew if I spoke up there would be retaliation,” Pezqueda, now
37, told me. “That’s why other women never speak up about what happened
to them.”
For all the Harvey Weinsteins, Al Frankens, and Russell
Simmonses who have lost their jobs after allegations surfaced of sexual
harassment, there is a sobering truth often lost in the #MeToo
movement—the push for accountability has class dimensions. Many other
less famous men, who have harassed women in less high-profile fields,
have not been held accountable. Virtually all of the men who have been
publicly excoriated for their conduct have worked in industries like
Hollywood, or politics, or law, that the public tends to study with
laser-like focus. “If an employer isn’t worried that there’s going to be
some huge public-relations issue stemming from harassment, then that is
one less reason for the employer to take it seriously,” Emily Martin,
the general counsel and vice president for workplace justice at the
National Women’s Law Center, told me.
Sexual harassment happens just as frequently—if not more frequently—in industries dominated by low-wage workers, according to analysis
of Equal Employment Opportunity Commission data by the left-leaning
Center for American Progress. Half of women working in the restaurant
industry experienced “scary” or “unwanted” sexual behavior, according to
a 2014 report
from the Restaurant Opportunities Center, a nonprofit that advocates
for workers in the food-services industry. Around 40 percent of women in
the fast-food industry have experienced unwanted sexual behaviors on
the job, according to a 2016 study
by Hart Research Associates, and 42 percent of those women felt that
they needed to accept it because they couldn’t afford to lose their
jobs. Harassment is frequent in these industries because of the wage and
power differences between the women and the men who supervise them,
according to Sarah Fleisch Fink, the senior counsel for the National
Partnership for Women & Families, a Washington, D.C., nonprofit. “An
imbalance of power in people in two different positions is a big part
of sexual harassment occurring, and I think that there’s probably
nowhere that occurs more than in lower-wage jobs,” she said. According
to the Center for American Progress,
the most sexual-harassment charges filed by workers from any one
industry between 2005 and 2015 were in one sector: accommodation and
food services.
In contrast, Mars
One, a private Dutch initiative to settle
Mars by 2026, has raised eyebrows for seeming to select
its astronauts using a format akin to reality TV. And while National Geographic’s upcoming docu-drama miniseriesMARS
features an internationally, racially and gender diverse crew in 2033 aboard
the Daedalus, it’s noticeable that
they are led by an all-American white male mission commander who will “be
the first to walk on Mars”.
In addition, if we are to colonize Mars or any other
planet or space station for that matter, then genetics and population dynamics
call for the largest and broadest sample of who we are to be included among the settlers. As
Sun Ra highlights, the worlds of art, music, philosophy, science and literature
are created by all of us. In space as on Earth, there is a deep value to
embracing and maintaining the plurality of our existence: it celebrates our
empathy and love for one another.
As Ra presaged, Space
Is The Place for us to take this love—the best of Earth’s legacy—to Mars
and beyond.
yournewswire |John Homeston, a retired CIA agent, has admitted this week on
National Russian Television (NTV) that the CIA was behind the creation
of the 1980s hip hop scene and financed major hip hop acts including
NWA, Afrika Bambaataa, and Grandmaster Flash & the Furious Five.
The government at the time spent “big money, serious money” on this covert operation destined to “further division” and “corrupt the American youth to nihilist, anti-establishment and anti-American ideologies”, he explained in a half hour interview broadcast on national television.
Famous hip hop songs of the legendary hip hop outfit NWA were even
scripted by a team of psychologists and war propagandists of the CIA. “F#ck the police,” and “When I’m called off, I got a sawed off / Squeeze the trigger, and bodies are hauled off,”
and other nihilist and anti-establishment lyrics were intended to
unleash a wave of cynicism towards authorities, promote the use of heavy
drugs, and entice the youth with revolutionary, counter-establishment
ideas.
The retired CIA agent claims the social engineering maneuver was “extremely successful.“
“We understood at the time that music was a powerful means of propaganda to reach the youth,” explained the 77-year-old man.
“Our mission was to use teenage angst to our advantage and turn
Generation X into a decadent, pro-drug and anti-establishment culture
that would create uprisings and further division within society. We even
infiltrated mainstream radio to promote their music and reach millions
of people everyday,” he admitted, visibly proud of the accomplishment.
“For many of us in the CIA, infiltrating the 1980s hip hop scene
was one of the CIA’s most successful experiments of propaganda to date,” he acknowledged during the interview.
“You could say Frankenstein’s monster got up off the table and started goose-stepping.”
conservativetreehouse | However, the ongoing Dossier story
gets far more intriguing as it is now discovered that Bruce G Ohr’s
wife, Nellie H. Ohr, actually worked for Fusion GPS and likely helped
guide/script the Russian Dossier. (Link)
Contacted by Fox News, investigators for the House
Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence (HPSCI) confirmed that Nellie
H. Ohr, wife of the demoted official, Bruce G. Ohr, worked for the
opposition research firm last year. The precise nature of Mrs. Ohr’s
duties – including whether she worked on the dossier – remains unclear
but a review of her published works available online reveals Mrs. Ohr
has written extensively on Russia-related subjects. HPSCI staff
confirmed to Fox News that she was paid by Fusion GPS through the summer
and fall of 2016.
But wait, it doesn’t stop there… Mrs. Nellie Ohr was not only a
Fusion GPS contracted employee, but she was also part of the CIA’s Open
Source Works, in Washington DC (link)
Both Mr. and Mrs Ohr worked on a collaborative group project surrounding International Organized Crime. (pdf here) Page #30 Screen Shot Below
The so-called fact checkers insists that any comparison of the FBI and KGB is “ridiculous” because the FBI is “subject to the rule of law and is democratically accountable.” But
there is little or no accountability when few members of Congress have
the courage to openly criticize or vigorously cross-examine FBI
officials. House Majority Leader Hale Boggs admitted in 1971 that Congress was afraid of the FBI:
“Our very fear of speaking out (against the FBI) ... has watered the
roots and hastened the growth of a vine of tyranny ... which is
ensnaring that Constitution and Bill of Rights which we are each sworn
to uphold.” The FBI is currently scorning almost every congressional
attempt at oversight. Thus far, members of Congress have responded with
nothing except press releases and talk show bluster.
Politifact repeatedly scoffs at the notion that the FBI is “a secret police agency such as the old KGB.”
And since the FBI is not as bad as the KGB, let’s mosey along and
pretend no good citizen has a right to complain. A similar standard
could exonerate any American president who was not as bad as Stalin.
In
the 1960s, some conservatives adorned their cars with “Support Your
Local Sheriff” bumper stickers. How long until we see Priuses with
“Support Your Secretive All-Powerful Federal Agents” bumper stickers?
But those who forget or deny past oppression help forge new shackles for
the American people.
A lot has been written lately about the success or failure of the
stimulus five years after it passed into law. For example, my friend and
colleague Michael Grunwald, an eloquent advocate for the stimulus, credits the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) with jump-starting an alternative energy
revolution and getting the ball rolling on electronic medical records,
among other laudable achievements. James Freeman in the Wall Street
Journal, on the other hand, blames the $800 billion-plus package for driving up debt and muffling economic growth.
Montgomery’s article avoids such broad brushstrokes, instead
documenting the observable results of one distinctive ARRA project. At
the urging of Rep. Emanuel Cleaver II (D-Mo.), stimulus money destined
for Kansas City was concentrated in one section of town. The goal was to
transform the area into an environmental showcase while catalyzing a
burst of green jobs. Covering
five neighborhoods and 150 square blocks, the zone encompasses a
troubled section of town where abandoned buildings share streetscapes
with the well-tended homes of obviously loving owners. In other words,
it is typical of struggling sections found in every great American
city—sliding in the wrong direction, but not too far gone to imagine a
renaissance.
I’ve seen similar neighborhoods turn around in places as diverse as South Beach, Harlem, and Washington’s
Logan Circle. In Denver, marginal neighborhoods around the old
Fitzsimmons Army Medical Center are steadily gaining momentum from the
new medical complex plopped into their midst. So I was intrigued to see
what could be done with a projected $200 million infusion in what
was—once upon a time—a thriving section of KC.
The answer: less than folks had hoped.
ARRA has equipped the Green Zone with charging stations for electric
cars that residents don’t own. Of the 1,000 or more homes targeted for
energy efficiency upgrades, fewer than 200—20 percent—received new
windows, insulation and weather-stripping (at an average cost of more
than $13,000 per home). The local utility launched a pilot project in
the zone to install “smart” meters that allow homeowners to better
regulate their electricity use. An unused school building was given new
life, and 11 miles of new sidewalks were built.
But as Montgomery reports, the project has, so far, failed to
generate its own momentum. Congressman Cleaver, a former Kansas City
mayor, sounded sheepish when he acknowledged that he and other zone
backers failed to execute their ideas efficiently enough to get all the
money spent. “We left tens of millions of federal dollars on the table,”
he told the Star. When funding for the Impact Zone staff ran out, no
agency stepped in to keep the office open.
RT | Exactly six years ago, on October 20th, 2011, Muammar Gaddafi
was murdered, joining a long list of African revolutionaries martyred by
the West for daring to dream of continental independence.
Earlier
that day, Gaddafi’s hometown of Sirte had been occupied by
Western-backed militias, following a month-long battle during which NATO
and its ‘rebel’ allies pounded the city’s hospitals and homes with
artillery, cut off its water and electricity, and publicly proclaimed
their desire to ‘starve [the city] into submission’.
The last defenders of the city, including Gaddafi, fled Sirte that
morning, but their convoy was tracked and strafed by NATO jets, killing
95 people. Gaddafi escaped the wreckage but was captured shortly
afterward. I will spare you the gruesome details, which the Western
media gloatingly broadcast across the world as a triumphant snuff movie, suffice to say that he was tortured and eventually shot dead.
We
now know, if testimony from NATO’s key Libyan ally Mahmoud Jibril is to
be believed, it was a foreign agent, likely French, who delivered the fatal bullet.
His death was the culmination of not only seven months of NATO
aggression, but of a campaign against Gaddafi and his movement, the West had been waging for over three decades.
Yet it was also the opening salvo in a new war - a war for the militarily recolonization of Africa.
The
year 2009, two years before Gaddafi’s murder, was a pivotal one for
US-African relations. First, because China overtook the US as the
continent’s largest trading partner; and second because Gaddafi was
elected president of the African Union.
The significance of both for the decline of US influence on the continent could not be clearer. While Gaddafi was spearheading attempts to unite Africa politically, committing serious amounts of Libyan oil wealth
to make this dream a reality, China was quietly smashing the West’s
monopoly over export markets and investment finance. Africa no longer
had to go cap-in-hand to the IMF for loans, agreeing to whatever
self-defeating terms were on offer, but could turn to China - or indeed Libya
- for investment. And if the US threatened to cut them off from their
markets, China would happily buy up whatever was on offer. Western
economic domination of Africa was under threat as never before.
The response from the West, of course, was a military one. Economic
dependence on the West - rapidly being shattered by Libya and China -
would be replaced by a new military dependence. If African countries
would no longer come begging for Western loans, export markets, and
investment finance, they would have to be put in a position where they
would come begging for Western military aid.
To this end, AFRICOM -
the US army’s new ‘African command’ - had been launched the previous
year, but humiliatingly for George W. Bush, not a single African country
would agree to host its HQ; instead, it was forced to open shop in
Stuttgart, Germany. Gaddafi had led African opposition to AFRICOM, as
exasperated US diplomatic memos later revealed by WikiLeaks made clear.
And US pleas to African leaders to embrace AFRICOM in the ‘fight against
terrorism’ fell on deaf ears.
After all, as Mutassim Gaddafi,
head of Libyan security, had explained to Hillary Clinton in 2009, North
Africa already had an effective security system in place, through the
African Union’s ‘standby forces,' on the one hand, and CEN-SAD on the
other. CEN-SAD was a regional security organization of Sahel and Saharan
states, with a well-functioning security system, with Libya as the
lynchpin. The sophisticated Libyan-led counter-terror structure meant
there was simply no need for a US military presence. The job of Western
planners, then, was to create such a need.
theoccidentalobserver |It
is unfortunate, to say the least, that Black hip-hop scholarship never
mentions the elephant in the room: Jewish control of the music industry.
If hip-hop is, indeed, ethno-politics set to music, if hip-hop has
taken the place of the civil rights movement in the hearts and minds of
Black youth, it is impossible to ignore the historic Black-Jewish
alliance against WASPs. For much of the twentieth century, that
alliance was a constituent element in what Black nationalist Harold
Cruse called the “fateful triangular tension among national
groups…coming to the fore” in the 60s.[28]
It is a truism of American political history that, from the Leo Frank
trial and the founding of the NAACP in the early twentieth century down
to the Black Lives Matter movement, Jewish intellectual-activists have
worked tirelessly to imbue disaffected American Negroes with their own
revolutionary spirit.[29]
Cruse
was himself a Negro member of the American Communist Party. By that
time, Jews had displaced Anglo-Saxons as the vanguard of American
Communism. Unlike WASP Communists, the Jews shaped radical politics in
accordance with “their own national group social ambitions or
individual self-elevation.” Negroes were relegated to the status of a
national minority in the party while Jews were free to pick up or drop
their Jewish identity as it suited them.[30]
This arrangement enabled Jews to become experts on “the Negro
problem.” Not surprisingly, Jewish artists, musicians, and radicals
then became highly visible players in the Civil Rights Movement of the
1950s and 60s. “As a result,” Cruse observes, “the great brainwashing
of Negro radical intellectuals was not achieved by capitalism, or the
capitalistic bourgeoisie, but by Jewish intellectuals in the American
Communist Party.”[31]
In
the contemporary hip-hop community, Jewish leadership has been hidden
behind the corporate veil. Tricia Rose vehemently denounces the
corrupting influence of corporate control on the hip-hop community but
her treatment of the subject obscures the identity of the corporate high
command.[32]
The music industry is absorbed into a vast impersonal system of “White
power,” a matrix whose denizens all routinely swallow the blue pill.
The closest we come to identifying those in charge is when Dyson
criticizes the “White corporate interests” exploiting Black talent.[33]
Jews
are never mentioned in Dyson’s work on hip-hop. Not surprisingly,
Dyson has unimpeachable philo-Semitic credentials. Blacks and Jews, he
believes, are united in common struggles against oppression in White
America. Far be it from him ever to cast Jews as an enemy of Black
folk. On his account, Blacks love Jews and Jews love Blacks.[34] Professor Rose also tip-toes around the issue of Jewish influence in the hip-hop community; The Hip Hop Wars
has no index entry for Jews. Only in passing does Rose name names.
But, when she does identify a few of the corporate heavyweights involved
in the hip-hop community, the elephant moves onto center stage.
In
a chapter on hip-hop’s responsibility for sexist and misogynist lyrics
and imagery, Rose mentions a rare public appearance by leading figures
in the corporate record industry. In their statements “corporate
executives such as Universal chairman Doug Morris, Warner chairman and
chief executive Edgar Bronfman, Sony chairman Andrew Lack, and Viacom
president and CEO Phillipe P. Dauman have defended their role as
distributors of intensely sexist content by subsuming sexism under
artists’ rights to express themselves freely.” Interestingly, in the
same paragraph, Rose urges us to “pull back the veil on the corporate
media’s manipulation of Black male and female artists and the impact
this has on fans and the direction of Black cultural expression.”[35]
Why does she not see fit to mention that the four corporate kingpins
she names are all Jews? The ethno-political fact is that Rose leaves
the corporate veil intact by ascribing blame for the corruption of the
hip-hop community to an abstraction called corporate greed. Rose heads
the Center for the Study of Race and Ethnicity in America at Brown
University.[36] How can she not be aware of the stunning success Jews have had in mixing business with ethno-politics?
After
all, a simple Google search on “Jews run hip hop” turns up a wealth of
investigative leads for a researcher eager to see how the “triangular
tension” between Jews, Negroes, and Anglo-Saxons” has accommodated
itself to the new players in American ethno-politics. Black scholars
typically ignore the criticisms of Jewish control commonly made by
rappers and fans.[37]
Traditional Catholics such as E. Michael Jones are also critical of
rap music as “one more manifestation of the behavior which goes along
with the Jewish revolutionary spirit that took over the Black mind
during the course of the 20thcentury.”[38] The Jewish revolutionary spirit has pioneered the techniques of using sex as an instrument of political control.[39] The hip-hop brand of sexuality is no exception.
Bearing
that in mind, it comes as no surprise to learn that hip-hop is deeply
involved “with the multibillion dollar pornographic industry. The strip
club has long been an integral part of both the music video and
business end, but since the start of the new century, there has been a
complete cross-over into pornography.” Orlando Patterson describes
scenes from these productions as “the most degrading and abusive
depictions of women imaginable.”[40]
Small wonder, then, that a Google search for “Jews run pornography”
yields another treasure trove of investigative leads sure to be left
unexplored (for fear of the Jews?) by both Black and White scholars.
thenation | there’s another reason actresses harassed by Weinstein may have been
discouraged from reporting sexual harassment. Any who were working on a
Weinstein film were almost certainly classified as independent
contractors, not regular employees. And that means that the
anti-discrimination and sexual-harassment protections of federal law
didn’t apply to them.
It’s a problem not just in Hollywood but throughout the economy,
in industries as diverse as real estate, trucking, technology, and home
health care. And the problem is growing. As more companies
classify their workers as independent contractors or push workers into
nontraditional employment arrangements, an increasing number of people
are at risk of having virtually no recourse for on-the-job harassment.
Workplace discrimination and harassment based on sex are prohibited
under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, which outlaws “employment
practice[s] [that] discriminate against any individual with respect to
his compensation, terms, conditions, or privileges of employment,
because of such individual’s race, color, religion, sex, or national
origin.” If an employee feels she is being harassed at work, she can
file a complaint with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, the
first step in taking legal action. But the catch is that she has to be
an employee for Title VII protections to apply. Independent contractors,
temp workers, and those employed by contracting companies are not
covered under the law. “Title VII has to be related to employment,”
explained Catherine Ruckelshaus, program director at the National
Employment Law Project. Anyone who’s not a traditional employee can’t
easily bring claims under it. “The more attenuated you get from an
employment relationship, the harder it is under Title VII.”
When a film gets made, the employer is typically a holding company,
often an LLC, and the people who work on the show are rarely traditional
W2 employees. “Almost everybody across the board in this industry works
as an independent contractor when there’s an individual production
getting made, when you work on a feature film,” explained Maria Giese, a
film director who has pushed for greater gender equality in the
industry. The same is typically true for those who work on theater productions
or commercials. An individual actress who has been sexually harassed
could try to bring a case under Title VII—but that would require her
first to prove that she was illegally classified as an independent
contractor and should have been an employee. She may be successful. “I
don’t think that there has been an answer legislated or adjudicated” as
to whether film employees should be treated like employees, said Melissa
Silverstein, founder of Women and Hollywood. For example, the Equal
Employment Opportunity Commission, which is charged with enforcing Title
VII and would only have jurisdiction if Title VII applied, is currently
investigating gender discrimination against directors at the major movie studios, with its efforts still pending.
Still, it’s a major hurdle. And if the actress can’t prove that
she was misclassified as a contractor, the only option left would be to
bring a contract claim between two business entities—the employer and
the contractor. “Then they’re in a private contract realm where they
would have to argue that the person violated their rights to operate
their business in an ethical manner,” Ruckelshaus explained. “Those are
really hard to bring because typically they’re very fact-based.… If you
get into the he said/she said side of things, if you can’t prove the
allegations of tort or contract breach, you’re out of luck.” Whereas
Title VII claims just have to prove the employer allowed harassment
based on sex, contract claims have to prove an employer’s intent to
discriminate. “It’s very specific,” Ruckelshaus said. “Filing a lawsuit
would be more difficult based on independent contractor status,” Giese
agreed.
On our post a month ago about elite ritualistic sex and drug crime magick My Eyes Shut to Your Misdeeds Brother, friend of the blog Rohan dropped a dime on some sordid, degenerate intersectional skullduggery emanating from a prominent homosexual democratic party activist in west Hollywood. We pick up here where he left off...,
SacObserver | The silence from L.A.’s Democratic community on the recent death of a
26-year-old Black gay male sex worker in the West Hollywood apartment
of 63-year-old prominent Democratic political donor Ed Buck has been
astounding.
Gemmel Moore’s July 27 death, was immediately classified as an
accidental methamphetamine overdose by the coroner, but now the
Sheriff’s Department is taking a closer look after his personal journal
was published. Numerous young Black gay men have stepped forward making
allegations against Buck recounting similar stories about a man who they
say has a Tuskegee Experiment like fetish which includes shooting drugs
into young Black men that he picks up off the street or via dating
hookup websites.
In his journal, Gemmel Moore wrote, “I honestly don’t know what to
do. I’ve become addicted to drugs and the worst one at that,” a December
entry reads. “Ed Buck is the one to thank. He gave me my first
injection of crystal meth it was very painful, but after all the
troubles, I became addicted to the pain and fetish/fantasy.”
His last entry, dated Dec. 3, 2016, reads: “If it didn’t hurt so bad, I’d kill myself, but I’ll let Ed Buck do it for now.
Buck has given hundreds of thousands of dollars of Democratic causes
and candidates over the years. His Facebook page boasts dozens of photos
of him with everyone from presidential candidate Hillary Clinton to
Governor Jerry Brown, Los Angeles County Democratic Party and California
Democratic Party chairman Eric Bauman and even Los Angeles Mayor Eric
Garcetti.
In online ads soliciting young Black gay men, Buck has referred to
them as being a “6-foot” n-word. On his Facebook page, he joked with
friends using the n-word.
Typically in politics, we try to distance ourselves from white people
who call Black people the n-word or use the n-word–not protect them
with our silence.
Most of Los Angeles’ Democratic and LGBT community–which are often
one in same–has had nothing to say publicly about Moore’s death.
Politicians who have received thousands of dollars from Buck over the
years have been curiously silent. I can count on one hand the number of
people from the political party of allies, coalition building and we’re
stronger together who have made a public call for a thorough
investigation into Gemmel Moore’s death in light of the numerous
allegations that have been made.
And while there was no shortage of politicians in Los Angeles falling
over themselves to issue statements and be seen in the media condemning
the events of Charlottesville and President Trump’s response to
them–locally they have seemingly looked the other way and conveniently
ignored that one of their top donors might be a serial predator who gets
his kicks by drugging vulnerable young Black gay men.
stockboardasset | Earlier this month, U.S. Attorney General Jeff Sessions unveiled a plan to go after doctors and pharmacies suspected of healthcare fraud by oversubscribing opioids. America’s opioid epidemic killed 33,000 people in 2015 making it the worst drug crisis in our history. Last week, President Donald Trump declared the opioid crisis a national emergency allowing the executive branch to direct funds towards treatment facilities and supplying police officers with naloxone.
As a socio-economist on the front lines of the opioid crisis in
Baltimore, Maryland. I am about to take you through an opioid experience
like you’ve never seen before. We’re going to travel into the inner
city of Baltimore and interview current and former addicts of opioids
and heroin. Some of these individuals used heroin 15-minutes before the
cameras started rolling.
These individuals have never been given the chance to tell their
story until now. Baltimore’s mainstream news is not allowed to share
this because it breaks the narrative that everything is awesome. It
turns out that Baltimore could have the largest methadone clinic in the
United States called Turning Point
Clinic. Each of the interviewees are current and past patients of the
clinic and speak very negatively about it. A similar description of
Baltimore is heard from each of the interviewees of a hellacious city
with decades of deindustrialization, drug abuse, and violent crime.
bitterqueen |Nancy Pelosi's father Thomas D'Alesandro Jr. allegedly was a "constant
companion" of notorious mobster Benjamin "Benny Trotta" Magliano and
other underworld figures during his political years in Baltimore, MD.
D'Alesandro was a Congressman for five terms from 1938 to 1947, and
Baltimore mayor for three terms from 1947 to 1959. Magliano was
identified by the FBI as one of Baltimore's "top hoodlums," and he
widely was acknowledged as the representative for New York's Frankie
Carbo who made his bones with Murder, Inc. and later became a made guy
in the Lucchese family. The allegations are included in D'Alesandro's
recently-released FBI files which Friends of Ours has obtained pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act.
In 1947 the FBI investigated Magliano for securing a draft exemption
from Selective Service for himself and prize fighters he controlled by
falsely representing they had essential employment at American Ship
Cleaning Company which was operated by John Cataneo. In fact,
Magliano and his boxers had no such employment, and they were convicted
with Cataneo in federal court for their unpatriotic draft-dodging scam.
Peter Galiano, one of the convicted boxers, told the FBI in January
1947 that "Thomas D'Alesandro was a constant companion of John Cataneo;
Benjamin Magliano . . . and [redacted]":
It was reported that these individuals
had worked hard for Thomas D'Alesandro's reelection to Congress and on
his campaign at that time to become Mayor of Baltimore. It was stated
that John Cataneo and Magliano during the time of this campaign were
under Federal indictments for violation of the Selective Service Act and
for fraud against the Government and were subsequently convicted in
Federal court. Cataneo allegedly admitted giving large sums of money
toward the Democratic campaign and stated that he would receive the
sanitation contracts for Baltimore if Mr. D'Alesandro was elected mayor.
At that time the FBI never investigated D'Alesandro concerning this
or numerous other allegations involving hoodlum associations and public
corruption. Of course, while in Congress D'Alesandro sat on the
appropriations committee and was a friend of Director J. Edgar Hoover.
For example, an FBI memo dated March 27, 1946 from E. G. Fitch to D. M.
Ladd provides:
Supervisor Orrin H. Bartlett advised me
that while talking to Congressman Thomas D'Alesandro, Jr. (D., Md.) on
March 26, 1946, the Congressman advised Agent Bartlett he was running
for Congress again in the fall 1946 election and that in 1947 he was
running for the office of Mayor of Baltimore. Congressman D'Alesandro
advised Agent Bartlett that since he had been on the Appropriations
Committee, he has been back of the Director and the Bureau one hundred
percent, and further, that he was vitally interested in and completely
satisfied with the results of the Bureau's work.
Hoover sent warm congratulations to D'Alesandro upon his November
1946 re-election to the House and then his May 1947 election as
Baltimore Mayor, and after leaving Congress for City Hall D'Alesandro
wrote Hoover by letter dated May 14, 1947:
Thank you very much for message
congratulating me on my election as Mayor of the City of Baltimore. I
was most pleased to receive your good wishes and assure you that I will
do my utmost to give the people of Baltimore an efficient and
outstanding administration. I, too, will miss you and many other
friends in Washington but I am grateful for the proximity of our two
cities which will afford the opportunity for frequent visits when and if
time permits. Whenever you are in Baltimore, please make it a point to
visit me at City Hall.
Meanwhile, the allegations against D'Alesandro continued to pile up.
Finally, in January 1961 President John F. Kennedy requested the G-men
to address "allegations of D'Alesando's involvement with Baltimore
hoodlums; with favoritism in awarding city contracts; [and] protection
for political contributors and the prosecution of local cases."
President Kennedy wanted to appoint D'Alesandro to the United States
Renegotiation Board which was a government watchdog against profit
gouging by defense contractors. A February 6, 1961 memo from Hoover to
the Baltimore and Washington Field Offices cautiously advises: "The
White House has requested that we proceed with a special inquiry
investigation but that if substantial derogatory information were
developed, we should report this and discontinue any further inquiries
because substantiation of any of the allegations would eliminate
D'Alesandro."
Citizenship, Criticism, and Communism
-
In the 1940s and ’50s, Americans engaged in an intense debate over the
content of school textbooks, particularly social studies texts. Fears of
communism a...
A Foundation of Joy
-
Two years and I've lost count of how many times my eye has been operated
on, either beating the fuck out of the tumor, or reattaching that slippery
eel ...
April Three
-
4/3
43
When 1 = A and 26 = Z
March = 43
What day?
4 to the power of 3 is 64
64th day is March 5
My birthday
March also has 5 letters.
4 x 3 = 12
...
Return of the Magi
-
Lately, the Holy Spirit is in the air. Emotional energy is swirling out of
the earth.I can feel it bubbling up, effervescing and evaporating around
us, s...
New Travels
-
Haven’t published on the Blog in quite a while. I at least part have been
immersed in the area of writing books. My focus is on Science Fiction an
Historic...
Covid-19 Preys Upon The Elderly And The Obese
-
sciencemag | This spring, after days of flulike symptoms and fever, a man
arrived at the emergency room at the University of Vermont Medical Center.
He ...