townhall | By a vote of 216 to 207 Tuesday evening, Democrats in the House of
Representatives blocked consideration of a bill that would require the
Director of National Intelligence to declassify information related to
the origins of the Wuhan coronavirus pandemic, specifically information
about any role the Wuhan Institute of Virology may have played in the
pandemic's outbreak.
— House Rules Republicans (@RulesReps) July 20, 2021
The COVID-19
Origin Act was introduced in the U.S. Senate by Josh Hawley (R-MO) and
Mike Braun (R-IN) and passed unanimously in May.
Rep. Michael
Burgess (R-TX) brought the COVID-19 Origin Act to the House floor for
consideration with Reps. Brad Wenstrup (R-OH) and Darin LaHood (R-IL)
explaining its importance shortly before Democrats voted down the
measure Tuesday night.
"The best disinfectant is sunlight and that's what we can provide today," Wenstrup explained
of the COVID-19 Origin Act. "The bill first establishes that we must
identify the precise origins of COVID-19 because it is critical for
preventing a similar pandemic in the future."
"I cannot stress
enough that this bill is not controversial by any means," Wenstrup
continued. "In fact, it passed the Senate in May with unanimous consent —
not one senator objected. Not Senators Ted Cruz or Rand Paul, not
Bernie Sanders or Elizabeth Warren. If those four members can get on
board with this bill, should not we be able to do the same?"
caitlinjohnstone | The weirdest thing about the Biden administration tasking itself
with the censorship of “disinformation” on social media is that the
United States is the hub of a globe-spanning empire that is built upon a
foundation of disinformation, maintained by disinformation, and
facilitated by disinformation.
If the propaganda engine of the US-centralized empire
ceased actively deceiving the public about the world, it would collapse
immediately. There would be mass unrest at home and abroad, status quo
politics would be abandoned, alliances and coalitions would crumble,
leaders official and unofficial would be ousted, and US unipolar
hegemony would end.
The
only thing keeping this from happening is the vast amounts of wealth
and energy which are poured into continuously deceiving the people of
America and its allies about what’s really going on in their nations and
political systems, and in the world as a whole.
Getting
people believing they live in separate, sovereign nations which
function independently from one another, instead of member states within
a single undeclared empire which moves as one unit on the international
stage.
Getting
people believing they control the fate of their nation via the
democratic process, when in reality all large-scale politics are
scripted puppet shows controlled by a plutocratic class who owns both
the politicians and the media outlets which report on them.
Getting
people believing they are part of a virtuous rules-based international
order which opposes totalitarian regimes to spread freedom and
democracy, instead of a tyrannical empire that works to destroy any
nation which disobeys its dictates.
And above all, manufacturing the illusion that the oppressive, exploitative imperialist status quo is normal.
harvard | ADOS leverages legitimate moral and legal arguments for reparations and grievances about the failure of the Democratic party to adequately support one of its most loyal and critical voting blocs but brings in immigration. Including immigration as a distinguishing factor is justified by legitimate statistics around how Black immigrants have much higher levels of wealth and educational achievement, as well as better health outcomes (Brown etal., 2017) versus native-born Black Americans, differences that can indeed be directly attributed to racial stress and intergenerational trauma that started in slavery and persists today (Doamekpor & Dinwiddle, 2015), despite evidence that this divergenceis the fault of treatment by the dominant white culture (Iheduru, 2013), and not of the immigrants. Animating ADOS grievances are the negative attitudes that Black immigrants can hold about native-born Black Americans (Nsangou & Dundes, 2018; Telusma, 2019), as well as perceptions of dominant cultural narratives favoring those who are apart from the direct legacy of the trauma of slavery and the indictment that legacy presents for the moral foundations of the United States.
ADOS also resents what it sees as justice claims of other groups being prioritized over those of native-born Black Americans. However, it sees the solution as narrowly advocating for the interests of native-born Black Americans alone, and rejecting any solidarity or larger coalitions (N’COBRA, 2020), including trans-national movements for reparations or coalitions that address how systematic racism also lethally affects Black immigrants and other groups. Significantly, Carnell previously sat on the board of Progressives for Immigration Reform (PFIR), a subsidiary of the Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR), which has been identified as a hate group by the Southern Poverty Law Center (Boehlert, 2019) because of its violent opposition to foreign nationals living in the United States.
The ultimate impact that ADOS may have had on the 2020 election will be hard to ascertain; however, it did have a notable media moment when rapper Ice Cube talked with the Trump campaign about his “Contract WithBlack America” in October, which was heavily based on ADOS ideas (Watts, 2020). The Trump campaign used this moment to claim approval from Ice Cube, an example of disinformation creep in trying to distract from Trump’s often outright racism and deep hostility and opposition to the far broader Movement for Black Lives coalition.
We scraped a set of 534 thousand tweets using “#ADOS” or two related terms (“#LineageMatters,” “AmericanDOS,” which we found were not widely used) and posted between November 1, 2019,and September 30, 2020, running analyses on weekly subsets to first understand the content of the ADOS network and to select tweets on which to carry out descriptive content analysis. The status_ids of the tweets, and scripts for both collection and analysis, are available from the Harvard Dataverse (Nkondeet al., 2021). For having accurate counts of daily frequencies to compare to real-world events, we supplemented this scraped set with access, via a third-party service, to a set of 1.36 million tweets pulled from the Twitter firehose. This includesa total of 1.1 million tweets using the #ADOS hashtag that were publicly visible on Twitter as of the end of 2020.
newyorker | Leslie
Kean is a self-possessed woman with a sensible demeanor and a nimbus of
curly graying hair. She lives alone in a light-filled corner apartment
near the northern extreme of Manhattan, where, on the wall behind her
desk, there is a framed black-and-white image that looks like a sonogram
of a Frisbee. The photograph was given to her, along with
chain-of-custody documentation, by contacts in the Costa Rican
government; in her estimation, it is the finest image of a U.F.O. ever
made public. The first time I visited, she wore a black blazer over a
T-shirt advertising “The Phenomenon,” a documentary from 2020 with
strikingly high production values in a genre known for grainy footage of
dubious provenance. Kean is stubborn but unassuming, and she tends to
speak of the impact of “the Times story,” and the new cycle of
U.F.O. attention it has inaugurated, as if she had not been its
principal instigator. She told me, “When the New York Times story came out, there was this sense of ‘This is what the U.F.O. people have wanted forever.’ ”
Kean
is always assiduously polite toward the “U.F.O. people,” although she
stands apart from the ufological mainstream. “It’s not necessarily that
what Greer was saying was wrong—maybe there have been visits by
extraterrestrials since 1947,” she said. “It’s that you have to be
strategic about what you say to be taken seriously. You don’t put out
someone talking about alien bodies, even if it might be true. Nobody was
ready for that; they didn’t even know that U.F.O.s were real.” Kean is
certain that U.F.O.s are real. Everything else—what they are, why
they’re here, why they never alight on the White House lawn—is
speculation.
Kean feels most at home in the
borderlands between the paranormal and the scientific; her latest
project examines the controversial scholarship on the possibility of
consciousness after death. Until recently, she dreaded the inevitable
dinner-party moment when other guests asked about her line of work and
she had to mumble something about U.F.O.s. “Then they’d sort of giggle,”
she said, “and I would have to say, ‘There’s actually a lot of serious
information.’ ” Her blunt, understated way of talking about
incomprehensible data gives her an air of probity. During my visit, as
she peered at her extensive library of canonical ufology texts—with such
titles as “Extraterrestrial Contact” and “Above Top Secret”—she sighed
and said, “Unfortunately, most of these aren’t very good.”
In her best-selling book, “UFOs: Generals, Pilots, and Government Officials Go on the Record,”
published in 2010 by an imprint of Random House, Kean wrote that “the
U.S. government routinely ignores UFOs and, when pressed, issues false
explanations. Its indifference and/or dismissals are irresponsible,
disrespectful to credible, often expert witnesses, and potentially
dangerous.” Her book is a sweeping reminder that this was not always the
case. In the decades after the Second World War, about half of all
Americans, including many in power, accepted U.F.O.s as a matter of
course. Kean sees herself as a custodian of this lost history. In her
apartment, a tranquil space decorated with a Burmese Buddha and bowls of
pearlescent seashells, Kean sat down on the floor, opened her file
cabinets, and disappeared into a drift of declassified memos, barely
legible teletypes, and yellowing copies of TheSaturday Evening Post and the Times Magazine featuring flying-saucer covers and long, serious treatments of the phenomenon.
Kean
grew up in New York City, a descendant of one of the nation’s oldest
political dynasties. Her grandfather Robert Winthrop Kean served ten
terms in Congress; he traced his ancestry, on his father’s side, to John
Kean, a South Carolina delegate to the Continental Congress, and, on
his mother’s, to John Winthrop, one of the Puritan founders of the
Massachusetts Bay Colony. She speaks of her family’s legacy in rather
abstract terms, except when discussing the abolitionist William Lloyd
Garrison, her grandfather’s great-grandfather, whom she regards as an
inspiration. Her uncle is Thomas Kean, who served two terms as New
Jersey’s governor and went on to chair the 9/11 Commission.
Kean
attended the Spence School and went to college at Bard. She has a
modest family income, and spent her early adult years as a “spiritual
seeker.” After helping to found a Zen center in upstate New York, she
worked as a photographer at the Cornell Lab of Ornithology. In the late
nineteen-nineties, after a visit to Burma to interview political
prisoners, she stumbled into a career in investigative journalism. She
took a job at KPFA, a radio station in Berkeley, as a producer and
on-air host for “Flashpoints,” a left-wing drive-time news program,
where she covered wrongful convictions, the death penalty, and other
criminal-justice issues.
In 1999, a journalist
friend in Paris sent her a ninety-page report by a dozen retired French
generals, scientists, and space experts, titled “Les OVNI et la Défense:
À Quoi Doit-On Se Préparer?”—“U.F.O.s and Defense: For What Must We
Prepare Ourselves?” The authors, a group known as COMETA,
had analyzed numerous U.F.O. reports, along with the associated radar
and photographic evidence. Objects observed at close range by military
and commercial pilots seemed to defy the laws of physics; the authors
noted their “easily supersonic speed with no sonic boom” and
“electromagnetic effects that interfere with the operation of nearby
radio or electrical apparatus.” The vast majority of the sightings could
be traced to meteorological or earthly origins, or could not be
studied, owing to paltry evidence, but a small percentage of them
appeared to involve, as the report put it, “completely unknown flying
machines with exceptional performances that are guided by a natural or
artificial intelligence.” COMETA had resolved, through the process of elimination, that “the extraterrestrial hypothesis” was the most logical explanation.
Kean had read Whitley Strieber’s “Communion,”
the 1987 cult best-seller about alien abduction, but until receiving
the French findings she had never had more than a mild interest in
U.F.O.s. “I had spent years at KPFA reporting on the horrors of the
world, injustice and oppression, and giving voice to the voiceless,” she
recalled. As she acquainted herself with the plenitude of odd episodes,
it was as if she’d seen beyond our own dismal reality and the
limitations of conventional thinking, and caught a glimpse of an
enchanted cosmos. “To me, this just transcended the endless struggle of
human beings,” she told me, during a long walk around her neighborhood.
“It was a planetary concern.” She stopped in the middle of the street.
Gesturing toward a heavily overcast sky, she said, “Why should we assume
we already understand everything there is to know, in our infancy here
on this planet?”
foreignpolicy | “It’s an act of war,” said
Christopher Miller, former President Donald Trump’s last acting
secretary of defense. He was talking about alleged attacks on diplomatic
and intelligence personnel by an unknown microwave directed-energy
weapon. But before the United States declares war on the unknown enemy
wielding that weapon, we should know what it is—and whether it exists at
all.
Every few weeks, another alleged attack on Americans is reported, some recent, some decades ago. The symptoms are neurological, such as dizziness, headaches, and brain damage. The first wave of reports came in 2016,
from the American and Canadian diplomatic missions in Havana, hence the
name “Havana syndrome.” Since then, similar cases have been reported in
other places, including China; Washington, D.C.; and Syria. State
Department and intelligence personnel make up most of those affected.
The State Department and the CIA have investigated Havana syndrome, with much criticism by the victims and their legal counsel. The Jasons, a group of defense advisors, have been reported to be studying the incidents. Most recently, the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine also conducted a study
that concluded a microwave attack was the most plausible explanation;
it also considered chemical pollutants, infectious agents, and
psychological and social factors, and found all these explanations
wanting.
Here’s the problem. Aside from the reported syndromes, there’s no
evidence that a microwave weapon exists—and all the available science
suggests that any such weapon would be wildly impractical. It’s possible
that the symptoms of all the sufferers of Havana syndrome share a
single, as yet unknown, cause; it’s also possible that multiple real
health problems have been amalgamated into a single syndrome.
It’s not the first time microwaves and embassies have mixed. From 1953 to 1976,
the U.S. Embassy in Moscow was bathed in high-powered microwaves coming
from a nearby building. The purpose seems to have been related to
espionage—activating listening devices within the embassy or interfering
with American transmissions. But a 1978 study concluded that there were
no adverse health effects.
Back in the United States, microwave ovens came into common use during the 1970s.
Their ability to heat food by imperceptible waves created many myths.
How they actually work is well understood. Some molecules, notably
water, absorb microwaves and turn them into heat. That happens across
the microwave and visible spectrum: Substances absorb energy of a higher
frequency and turn it into heat. It’s why sunlight heats surfaces.
There’s a persistent myth that microwaves heat things from the inside
out. Anyone who has heated a frozen dinner knows that this is not true.
The outer part of the frozen food thaws first, because it absorbs the
microwaves before they can reach the inner part. Back in the day, when I
was working for the Los Alamos National Laboratory, I had to debunk the
idea that microwave heating could produce oil from underground oil
shale. Water and minerals between the shale and the microwave source
above ground would absorb the microwaves. In the same way, if a directed
microwave beam hit people’s brains, we would expect to see visible
effects on the skin and flesh. None of that has accompanied Havana
syndrome.
thewrap | On Tuesday, Tucker talked about what he argued has been a severe
miscommunication problem from medical science leaders regarding the
vaccines, in particular messaging that suggests people’s lives cannot
meaningfully change even after they’ve received the vaccine — which
actually we’ll concede is a good point. Tucker also brought up the pause
in distribution of the Johnson & Johnson vaccine following a tiny
fraction of people who developed a blood clot disorder after taking it.
This led him to say, “It is possible, in fact, that this vaccine is more dangerous than they’re indicating it is.”
And then later in the rant, he appeared to suggest that the vaccines
may not work at all, and that it’s possible that a conspiracy of some
sort might be covering that up. If you don’t believe us, here is what he
said, verbatim:
“Experts say it is not entirely clear when it will be considered okay
for people who are fully vaccinated to stop wearing masks. At some
point, no one is asking this but everyone should be, what is this about?
If vaccines work, why are vaccinated people still banned from living
normal lives? Honestly, what’s the answer to that, it doesn’t make any
sense at all. If the vaccine is effective there’s no reason for people
who’ve received a vaccine to wear masks or avoid physical contact. So
maybe it doesn’t work and they’re simply not telling you that. Well
you’d hate to think that especially if you’ve gotten two shots but
what’s the other potential explanation? We can’t think of one.”
Yes, Tucker actually said this. Perhaps it was just a rhetorical device, but if so, he didn’t say that was the case.
Representative Jim Jordan asked Dr. Fauci when the COVID mitigation would be considered successful? When exactly would Americans be permitted to recapture the rights the government has taken away? What exactly are the metrics that define success?….
Jordan continued to press him for a specific number. But, as Fauci started to give a response, the next committee member began to speak, thanking Clyburn.
“I’d like my question answered!” Jordan shouted, in response to which Rep. Maxine Waters (D-Calif.) yelled: "You need to respect the chair and shut your mouth!”
realclearpolitics | Before the next of kin were even notified in the horrific shootings
last week at three Atlanta-area massage parlors, the narrative was
established: The fact that six of the eight victims were Asian women
provides the proof that a “surge in hate crimes”
against Asian Americans has bubbled up in the U.S. in response to the
coronavirus pandemic. That fits neatly with the view of some Americans
that our society, at its heart, is racist.
For contrast, consider the mass shooting this week in Boulder, Colo.,
in which the suspect is Syrian American. Even though all the victims
were of the same race, no one assumes without proof that he was acting
out of racial animosity because, of course, they were white. In Atlanta,
the shooter killed two white people and injured a Latino. But the
killings must still be motivated by anti-Asian hatred, right?
“Racially motivated violence must be called out for exactly what it
is -- and we must stop making excuses or rebranding it as economic
anxiety or sexual addiction,” Rep. Marilyn Strickland (pictured) told
members of the House a day after the Atlanta shootings. In a CNN
interview, Strickland, whose heritage is both African American and
Korean American, called the incident a racially motivated hate crime.
None of the evidence to emerge thus far supports that speculation.
Like Strickland, I am Korean American, and the idea that someone
might randomly attack me at the gym or hurl racist invectives at me in
the grocery checkout line makes me uneasy. So I looked into the numbers
being used to support the so-called “surge” in attacks. They turn out to
be thin, with data points cherry-picked to invoke fear and bolster the
wobbly claim that the Atlanta shooter was driven by racism.
A report
by the Center for the Study of Hate and Extremism drew national media
attention for identifying a 149% increase in anti-Asian hate crimes in
2020 compared to 2019 in 16 of our largest cities. A startling number --
until you learn the actual number of hate crimes in those cities rose
from 49 to 122 – in a country of 330 million people.
In my hometown, Houston, there were three last year. The year before, there were none.
And what about the 3,795 incidents of harassment
and discrimination against Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders
documented by Stop AAPI Hate? The group’s data point is even more
useless than the 149% increase figure. Stop AAPI (shorthand for Asian
American and Pacific Islander) Hate was formed as the coronavirus
pandemic took hold in the U.S. and its data has no baseline for
comparison.
But it may be sufficiently frightening to open a line of federal
spending directly to Stop AAPI Hate’s member organizations. The group
was on Capitol Hill last week to urge lawmakers to address the kind of incidents it tracks and to fund programs supporting the victims.
greenwald |Journalists with the largest and most influential
media outlets disseminated an outright and quite significant lie on
Tuesday to hundreds of thousands of people, if not millions, on Twitter.
While some of them were shamed into acknowledging the falsity of their
claim, many refused to, causing it to continue to spread up until this
very moment. It is well worth examining how they function because this
is how they deceive the public again and again, and it is why public
trust in their pronouncements has justifiably plummeted.
The
lie they told involved claims of Russian involvement in the procurement
of Hunter Biden’s laptop. In the weeks leading up to the 2020 election,
The New York Post obtained that laptop and published a series
of articles about the Biden family’s business dealings in Ukraine, China
and elsewhere. In response, Twitter banned the posting of any links to that reporting and locked The Post out
of its Twitter account for close to two weeks, while Facebook, through a
long-time Democratic operative, announced that it would algorithmically
suppress the reporting.
The excuse used by those social media companies for censoring this reporting was the same invoked by media outlets
to justify their refusal to report the contents of these documents:
namely, that the materials were “Russian disinformation.” That claim of
“Russian disinformation” was concocted by a group of several dozen former CIA officials and other operatives of the intelligence community devoted to defeating Trump. Immediately after The Post
published its first story about Hunter Biden’s business dealings in
Ukraine that traded on his influence with his father, these career spies
and propagandists, led by Obama CIA Director and serial liar John
Brennan, published a letter asserting that the appearance of these Biden documents “has all the classic earmarks of a Russian information operation.”
News outlets uncritically hyped this claim as fact even though these security state operatives themselves admitted: “We want to emphasize that we do not know if the emails…are genuine or not and that we do not have evidence of Russian involvement
-- just that our experience makes us deeply suspicious that the Russian
government played a significant role in this case.” Even though this
claim came from trained liars who, with uncharacteristic candor,
acknowledged that they did not “have evidence” for their claim, media
outlets uncritically ratified this assertion.
This was a topic I discussed extensively in October when I announced my resignation from The Intercept
after senior editors — for the first time in seven years — violated the
contractual prohibition on editorial interference in my journalism by
demanding I significantly alter my reporting about these documents by
removing the sections that reflected negatively on Biden. What I found
particularly galling about their pretense that they have such high-level
and rigorous editorial standards — standards they claimed, for the
first time ever, that my article failed to meet — was that a mere week
prior to their censorship of my article, they published an article by a different journalist which, at a media outlet we created with the explicit purpose of treating government claims with skepticism, instead treated the CIA’s claims of “Russian disinformation” as fact. Even
worse, when they quoted the CIA’s letter, they omitted the part where
even those intelligence agents acknowledged that they had no evidence
for their assertion.
This wouldn’t be much of a story if it weren’t the third most
outlandish thing Reid said in the last week. Instead, Reid is empowered
to say what appears to be more hyperbolic and vitriolic comments,
encouraged by her Twitter followers and, apparently, by her bosses at
the NBC News-affiliated cable channel.
On Wednesday night’s Reid Out, the host was opining on the decision by Texas Gov. Greg Abbott
to “open” the state and end the statewide mask mandate. With the chyron
“Texas To End All COVID Precautions” (not true, but moving on), Reid had this to say about Texas and Mississippi:
“These states, what they have in common, is they have structures which
say black and brown lives matter less. All that matters is that Black
and brown people get their behinds into the factory and make me my
steaks. Make me my stuff. Get there and do my nails. Work. Get back to
work now, and do the things that I, the comfortable, affluent, person
need. Isn’t that what we’re seeing?”
There’s a lot here to unpack. Reid’s conclusion is that Texas is
going to change Covid rules so “Black and brown people” can… “make me my
steaks”? It’s confusing, and offensive — and spoken with such a total
certainty, which makes it so much worse.
Which brings us to this tweet from Reid, also from Wednesday and also supremely confident, about what “people on the right” think:
I’ll say it again: people on the right would trade all the tax cuts for the ability to openly say the n-word like in “the good old days.” To them, not being able to be openly racist and discriminatory without consequence is oppression. Trump is the avatar for this “freedom.” https://t.co/RlqAFYe5Zr
Yes, Reid apparently believes that “people on the right” would like to
“openly say the n-word,” and that “not being able to be openly racist”
is “oppression” to these people. Note — this is not directed at
“racists” or “white supremacists.” It’s not even couching this as “some
people on the right.” It’s just a blanket, across-the-board comment,
according to Reid, that all people on the right think this way.
Theoretically, Joy Reid works with “people on the right” — like Nicolle Wallace. But I mean this sincerely — does Joy Reid really know a single Republican?
thedebrief |In an exclusive feature for The Debrief,
U.S. military and intelligence officials, as well as Pentagon emails,
offer an unprecedented glimpse behind the scenes of what’s currently
going on with The Pentagon’s investigation into UFOs, or as they term
them, “Unidentified Aerial Phenomena” (UAP).
For the last two years, the
Department of Defense’s newly revamped “Unidentified Aerial Phenomena
Task Force” (or UAPTF) has been busy briefing lawmakers, Intelligence
Community stakeholders, and the highest levels of the U.S. military on
encounters with what they say are mysterious airborne objects that defy
conventional explanations.
Along with classified briefings,
multiple senior U.S. officials with direct knowledge of the matter say
two classified intelligence reports on UAP have been widely distributed
to the U.S. Intelligence Community. Numerous sources from various
government agencies told The Debrief
that these reports include clear photographic evidence of UAP. The
reports also explicitly state that the Task Force is considering the
possibility that these unidentified objects could, as stated by one
source from the U.S. Intelligence Community said, be operated by
“intelligences of unknown origin.”
Significantly, a retired U.S. Air
Force brigadier general and head of RAND corporation’s Space Enterprise
Initiative has—for the first time—gone on record to discuss some of the
most likely explanations for UAP.
His responses were surprising.
Overwhelmingly, everyone The Debrief
spoke with said the most striking feature of the recently released
UAPTF intelligence position report was the inclusion of new and
“extremely clear” photograph of an unidentifiable triangular aircraft.
The photograph, which is said to
have also been taken from inside the cockpit of a military fighter jet,
depicted an apparent aerospace vehicle described as a large equilateral
triangle with rounded or “blunted” edges and large, perfectly spherical
white “lights” in each corner. Officials who had seen it said the image
was captured in 2019 by an F/A-18 fighter pilot.
Two officials that received the
report said the photo was taken after the triangular craft emerged from
the ocean and began to ascend straight upwards at a 90-degree angle. It
was indicated that this event occurred off the eastern coast of the
United States. Several other sources confirmed the photo’s existence;
however, they declined to provide any further specifics of the
incident.
Regarding the overall theme of the
recent report, officials who read it say the report primarily focused
on “Unidentified Submersible Phenomena,” or unidentified “transmedium”
vehicles capable of operating both under water and in the air.
The three officials we spoke with
said the report suggested the UAP Task Force appears to be concerned
that the objects being termed as UAP may be originating from within the
world’s oceans. Strange as this may sound, the idea of “USOs” or
“unidentified submersible objects” is not something exclusive to the
current UAPTF.
technologyreview | In July,
Joseph Giaime, a physics professor at Louisiana State University and
Caltech, gave me a tour of one of the most complex science experiments
in the world. He did it via Zoom on his iPad. He showed me a control
room of LIGO, a large physics collaboration based in Louisiana and Washington state. In 2015, LIGO was the first project to directly detect gravitational waves, created by the collision of two black holes 1.3 billion light-years away.
About
30 large monitors displayed various aspects of LIGO’s status. The
system monitors tens of thousands of data channels in real time. Video
screens portrayed light scattering off optics, and data charts depicted
instrument vibrations from seismic activity and human movement.
I was visiting this complicated operation, on which hundreds of
specialists in discrete scientific subfields work together, to try to
answer a seemingly simple question: What does it really mean to know
anything? How well can we understand the world when so much of our
knowledge relies on evidence and argument provided by others?
The
question matters not only to scientists. Many other fields are becoming
more complex, and we have access to far more information and informed
opinions than ever before. Yet at the same time, increasing political
polarization and misinformation are making it hard to know whom or what
to trust. Medical advances, political discourse, management practice,
and a good deal of daily life all ride on how we evaluate and distribute
knowledge.
We overstate enormously the individual’s ability to
amass knowledge, and understate society’s role in possessing it. You may
know that diesel fuel is bad for gas engines and that plants use
photosynthesis, but can you define diesel or explain photosynthesis, let
alone prove photosynthesis happens? Knowledge, as I came to recognize
while researching this article, depends as much on trust and
relationships as it does on textbooks and observations.
Thirty-five years ago, the philosopher John Hardwig published a paper
on what he called “epistemic dependence,” our reliance on others’
knowledge. The paper—well-cited in some academic circles but largely
unknown elsewhere—only grows in relevance as society and knowledge
become more complex.
One common definition of knowledge is
“justified true belief”—facts you can support with data and logic. As
individuals, though, we rarely have the time or skills to justify our
own beliefs. So what do we really mean when we say we know something?
Hardwig posed a dilemma: Either much of our knowledge can be held only
by a collective, not an individual, or individuals can “know” things
they don’t really understand. (He chose the second option.)
msdnc | It must've seemed like a good idea at the
time. Rudy Giuliani and his allies apparently thought they could package
an anti-Biden smear, hand it to a media ally, and watch as the closing
weeks of the 2020 presidential race focused on their "October Surprise."
It'd fundamentally change the trajectory of the election and put Donald
Trump in a position to hold onto power.
It's not quite working out that way.
As
we've discussed, Giuliani and Steve Bannon delivered an anti-Biden
smear to the New York Post, and the conservative tabloid ran its literally unbelievable story last week. The article was filled with convoluted details
involving a Ukrainian gas company, Hunter Biden, his alleged laptop,
some of his alleged emails, and an unnamed shop owner in Delaware. Of
course, the underlying premise of the allegations was discredited quite a while ago, which is why most major news organizations had the good sense to steer clear of the Post's reporting.
As scrutiny of the scheme intensified, we learned that many inside the tabloid disagreed with the decision to publish the anti-Biden article. But more importantly, they're not the only ones with concerns.
The entire mess is now being investigated
by federal authorities as potentially being part of a hostile foreign
influence operation illegally targeting our election. Indeed, Politico publishedthis report overnight:
More
than 50 former senior intelligence officials have signed on to a letter
outlining their belief that the recent disclosure of emails allegedly
belonging to Joe Biden's son "has all the classic earmarks of a Russian
information operation."
These
dozens of former officials added that their extensive national security
experience has left them "deeply suspicious that the Russian government
played a significant role in this case" and cited several elements of
the story that suggested the Kremlin's hand at work.
WaPo | U.S.
intelligence agencies warned the White House last year that President
Trump’s personal lawyer Rudolph W. Giuliani was the target of an
influence operation by Russian intelligence, according to four former
officials familiar with the matter.
The
warnings were based on multiple sources, including intercepted
communications, that showed Giuliani was interacting with people tied to
Russian intelligence during a December 2019 trip to
Ukraine, where he was gathering information that he thought would
expose corrupt acts by former vice president Joe Biden and his son
Hunter.
The
intelligence raised concerns that Giuliani was being used to feed
Russian misinformation to the president, the former officials said,
speaking on the condition of anonymity to discuss sensitive information
and conversations.
The
warnings to the White House, which have not previously been reported,
led national security adviser Robert O’Brien to caution Trump in a
private conversation that any information Giuliani brought back from
Ukraine should be considered contaminated by Russia, one of the former
officials said.
The
message was, “Do what you want to do, but your friend Rudy has been
worked by Russian assets in Ukraine,” this person said. Officials wanted
“to protect the president from coming out and saying something stupid,”
particularly since he was facing impeachment over his own efforts to strong-arm Ukraine’s president into investigating the Bidens.
But
O’Brien emerged from the meeting uncertain whether he had gotten
through to the president. Trump had “shrugged his shoulders” at
O’Brien’s warning, the former official said, and dismissed concern about
his lawyer’s activities by saying, “That’s Rudy.”
Officials’
warnings about Giuliani underscore the concern in the U.S. intelligence
community that Russia not only is seeking to reprise the disinformation
campaign it waged in 2016, but also may now be aided, unwittingly or
otherwise, by individuals close to the president. Those warnings have
gained fresh urgency in recent days. The information that Giuliani
sought in Ukraine is similar to what is contained in emails and other correspondence
published this week by the New York Post, which the paper said came
from the laptop of Hunter Biden and were provided by Giuliani and
Stephen K. Bannon, Trump’s former top political adviser at the White
House.
The
Washington Post was unable to verify the authenticity of the alleged
communications, which concern Hunter Biden’s business dealings in
Ukraine and China.
NYTimes | Russia continues to use a network of
proxy websites to spread pro-Kremlin disinformation and propaganda in
the United States and other parts of the West, according to a State Department report released on Wednesday.
The
report is one of the most detailed explanations yet from the Trump
administration on how Russia disseminates disinformation, but it largely
avoids discussing how Moscow is trying to influence the current
campaign. Even as Democrats on Capitol Hill have urged the American
government to declassify more information on Russia’s efforts to
interfere with the election, President Trump has repeatedly told
officials such disclosures are unwelcome.
Most
of the report focuses on an ecosystem of websites, many of them fringe
or conspiracy minded, that Russia has used or directed to spread
propaganda on a variety of topics. Those include an online journal
called the Strategic Culture Foundation and other sites, like the
Canada-based Global Research. The document builds on information disclosed last week by American officials about Russian intelligence’s control of various propaganda sites.
Secretary
of State Mike Pompeo, who announced the release of the report on
Wednesday, said the State Department would offer rewards of up to $10
million for information to help identify any person who, acting at the
direction of a foreign government, tries to hack into election or
campaign infrastructure.
The report was prepared by the
department’s Global Engagement Center, whose mandate is only to examine
propaganda efforts outside the United States.
The
report states that the Strategic Culture Foundation is directed by
Russia’s foreign intelligence service, the S.V.R., and stands as “a
prime example of longstanding Russian tactics to conceal direct state
involvement in disinformation and propaganda outlets.” The organization
publishes a wide variety of fringe voices and conspiracy theories in
English, while trying to obscure its Russian government sponsorship.
wrongkindofgreen | (wrong kind of green dollar-dollar-bill-y'all is just entirely too clever)
“The ruling class exists, it’s not a conspiracy theory.
They operate as a class, too. They share the same values, the same
sensibility and in Europe and North America they are white. They act in
accordance with their interests, which are very largely identical. The
failure to understand this is the single greatest problem and defect in
left discourse today.”
— John Steppling, Author, Playwright
“This report is crucial reading for anyone interested in creatively
considering the multiple, divergent ways in which our world could
evolve.”
— Judith Rodin, President of the Rockefeller Foundation
torytelling. Dystopian scenarios. Not Huxley, Orwell, Bradbury or Brunner.
Scenario planning for corporate strategy was pioneered by Royal Dutch
Shell in the 1970s. [Further reading on scenario planning: The Art of the Long View]The
following excerpts are highlights from the May 2010 “Scenarios for the
Future of Technology & International Development” report produced by
The Rockefeller Foundation & Global Business Network. Not just the
more known “Lock Step” scenario, but all four scenarios.
Following “Event 201”
(Oct 18, 2019), we must concede that the ruling class has been gifted
with phenomenal and prophetic intuitions and insights. (They truly are
the chosen ones.) Thus it is worthwhile, even mandatory, to study their
scenario exercises and simulations.
“We believe that scenario planning has great potential
for use in philanthropy to identify unique interventions… scenario
planning allows us to achieve impact more effectively.” [p 4]
“The results of our first scenario planning exercise demonstrate a
provocative and engaging exploration of the role of technology and the
future of globalization.” [p 4]
“This report is crucial reading for anyone interested in creatively
considering the multiple, divergent ways in which our world could
evolve.” [p 4]
“*I offer a special thanks to Peter Schwartz, Andrew Blau, and the
entire team at Global Business Network, who have helped guide us through
this stimulating and energizing process.” [*Judith Rodin, President of
the Rockefeller Foundation] [p 4]
“*I hope this publication makes clear exactly why my colleagues and I
are so excited about the promise of using scenario planning to develop
robust strategies.” [*Judith Rodin, President of the Rockefeller
Foundation][p 5]
Peter Schwartz is an American futurist, innovator and co-founder of
the Global Business Network (GBN), a corporate strategy firm,
specializing in future-think & scenario planning. Founded in 1987,
GBN was “a membership organization comprising executives from many of
the world’s leading companies alongside individual members from
business, science, the arts, and academia.” The proprietary list of
GBN’s corporate members included “more than 100 of the world’s leading
companies, drawn from virtually every industry and continent.” Members
paid an annual subscription fee of $35,000. [Source]
Following an acquisition by Monitor in 2000, GBN then specialized in
scenario-based consulting and training. GBN ceased to be active
following the acquisition of the Monitor Group by Deloitte in 2013.
“Perhaps most importantly, scenarios give us a new,
shared language that deepens our conversations about the future and how
we can help to shape it.” [p 7]
“How can we best position ourselves not just to identify technologies
that improve the lives of poor communities but also to help scale and
spread those that emerge?” [p 8]
The Four Scenarios
“Once crossed, these axes create a matrix of four very different futures:
LOCK STEP – A world of tighter top-down government control and more
authoritarian eadership, with limited innovation and growing citizen
pushback
CLEVER TOGETHER – A world in which highly coordinated and successful
strategies emerge for addressing both urgent and entrenched worldwide
issues
HACK ATTACK – An economically unstable and shock-prone world in which
governments weaken, criminals thrive, and dangerous innovations emerge
SMART SCRAMBLE – An economically depressed world in which individuals
and communities develop localized, makeshift solutions to a growing set
of problems”
“Each scenario tells a story of how the world, and in
particular the developing world, might progress over the next 15 to 20
years,… Accompanying each scenario is a range of elements that aspire to
further illuminate life, technology, and philanthropy in that world.”
[p 17]
Scenario #1: LOCK STEP
“In 2012, the pandemic that the world had been
anticipating for years finally hit. Unlike 2009’s H1N1, this new
influenza strain — originating from wild geese — was extremely virulent
and deadly. Even the most pandemic-prepared nations were quickly
overwhelmed when the virus streaked around the world, infecting nearly
20 percent of the global population and killing 8 million in just seven
months, the majority of them healthy young adults. The pandemic also had
a deadly effect on economies: international mobility of both people and
goods screeched to a halt, debilitating industries like tourism and
breaking global supply chains. Even locally, normally bustling shops and
office buildings sat empty for months, devoid of both employees and
customers.” [p 18]
“The pandemic blanketed the planet — though
disproportionate numbers died in Africa, Southeast Asia, and Central
America, where the virus spread like wildfire in the absence of official
containment protocols. But even in developed countries, containment was
a challenge. The United States’s initial policy of “strongly
discouraging” citizens from flying proved deadly in its leniency, accelerating the spread of the virus not
just within the U.S. but across borders. However, a few countries did
fare better — China in particular. The Chinese government’s quick
imposition and enforcement of mandatory quarantine for all citizens, as
well as its instant and near-hermetic sealing off of all borders, saved
millions of lives, stopping the spread of the virus far earlier than in
other countries and enabling a swifter postpandemic
recovery. [p 18]
The Great Reset was laid out a decade ago by the Rockefeller Foundation(showed you the rabbit hole last saturday, but nobody went in head first)
“In 2012, the pandemic that the world had been
anticipating for years finally hit. Unlike 2009’s H1N1, this new
influenza strain — originating from wild geese — was extremely virulent
and deadly. Even the most pandemic-prepared nations
were quickly overwhelmed when the virus streaked around the world,
infecting nearly 20 percent of the global population and killing 8
million in just seven months…”
Then the scenario gets very interesting:
“The pandemic also had a deadly effect on
economies: international mobility of both people and goods screeched to a
halt, debilitating industries like tourism and breaking global supply
chains. Even locally, normally bustling shops and
office buildings sat empty for months, devoid of both employees and customers.” This sounds eerily familiar.
“During the pandemic, national leaders around the
world flexed their authority and imposed airtight rules and
restrictions, from the mandatory wearing of face masks to
body-temperature checks at the entries to communal spaces like train
stations and supermarkets. Even after the pandemic faded, this more
authoritarian control and oversight of citizens and their activities
stuck and even intensified. In order to protect themselves from the
spread of increasingly global problems — from pandemics
and transnational terrorism to environmental crises and rising poverty —
leaders around the world took a firmer grip on power.”
At first, the notion of a more controlled world gained wide acceptance and approval. Citizens willingly gave up some of their sovereignty-and their privacy- to more paternalistic states in for greater safety and stability. Citizens
were more tolerant, and even eager, for top-down direction and oversight,
and national leaders had more latitude to impose order in the ways they
saw fit. In developed countries, this heightened oversight took many
forms: biometric IDs for all citizens,
for example, and tighter regulation of key industries whose stability
was deemed vital to national interests. In many developed countries,
enforced cooperation with a suite of new regulations and agreements
slowly but steadily restored both order and, importantly,
economic growth.
Because I've cultivated a baseline of vague digust until disproven or aesthetically overcome - the social distancing for health program doesn't work on me at all. But I'm curious to know if any of you feel any differently about these humans after several months of the social distancing programme? Part of this I really do understand, because for me personally, disgust is the immediate and acute precursor to violence. If you can make these humans all a priori disgusted with one another....,
off-guardian | Western civilization, led by the US government and
media, has embarked upon a campaign of mass psychological terrorism
designed to cover for the collapsing economy, set up a new pretext for
Wall Street’s ongoing plunder expedition, radically escalate the police
state, deeply traumatize people into submission to total social
conformity, and radically aggravate the anti-social, anti-human
atomization of the people.
The pretext for this abomination is an epidemic which objectively is
comparable to the seasonal flu and is caused by the same kind of
Coronavirus we’ve endured so long without totalitarian rampages and mass
insanity.
The global evidence is converging on the facts: This flu is somewhat
more contagious than the norm and is especially dangerous for those who
are aged and already in poor health from pre-existing maladies. It is
not especially dangerous for the rest of the population.
The whole concept of “lockdowns” is exactly upside down, exactly the
wrong way any sane society would respond to this circumstance.
It’s the vulnerable who should be shielded while nature takes its
course among the general population, who should go about life as usual.
Dominionist-technocratic rigidity can’t prevent an epidemic from cycling
through the population in spite of the delusions of that religion,
especially since Western societies began their measures far too late
anyway.
So it’s best to let herd immunity develop as fast as it naturally
will, at which time the virus recedes from lack of hosts (and is likely
to mutate in a milder direction along the way). This is the only way to
bring a safer environment for all including the most vulnerable.
The fact that most societies have rejected the sane, scientific route
in favor of doomed-to-fail attempts at a forcible violent segregation
and sterilization is proof that governments aren’t concerned with the
public health (as if we didn’t know that already from a thousand
policies of poisoning the environment while gutting the health care
system), but are very ardent to use this crisis they artificially
generated in order radically to escalate their police state power toward
totalitarian goals.
The whole concept of self-isolation and anti-social “distancing” is
radically anti-human. We evolved over millions of years to be social
creatures living in tight-knit groups. Although modern societies
ideologically and socioeconomically work to massify and atomize people,
nevertheless almost all of us still seek close human companionship in
our lives.
(I suspect most of the internet police-state-mongers are not only
fascists at heart but are confirmed misanthropic loners who couldn’t
care less about human closeness.)
This terror campaign seeks to blast to pieces any remaining human
closeness, which means any remaining humanity as such, the better to
isolate individual atoms for subjection to total domination. Arendt
wrote profoundly on this goal of totalitarian governments, though even
she didn’t envision a state-driven cult of the literal physical
repulsion of every atom from every other atom.
So far the people are submitting completely to a terror campaign
dedicated to the total eradication of whatever community was left in the
world, and especially whatever community was starting to be rebuilt.
thelastamericanvagabond |The alleged gunmen who killed the son of Esther Salas,
the judge recently assigned to the Epstein-Deutsche Bank case, worked
for a company of corporate spies and mercenaries with ties to
intelligence and also to Deutsche Bank.
The news of the shooting of the husband and son of Esther Salas, the
judge recently assigned to oversee the Jeffrey Epstein – Deutsche Bank
case, caused shock and confusion while also bringing renewed scrutiny to
the Epstein scandal just a week after Epstein’s main co-conspirator,
Ghislaine Maxwell, was denied bail in a separate case.
The case Salas is set to oversee is a class action lawsuit brought by Deutsche Bank investors who
allege that Deutsche Bank “failed to properly monitor customers that
the Bank itself deemed to be high risk, including, among others, the
convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.” The case came after the New
York state Department of Financial Services had settled with Deutsche
Bank over the bank’s failure to cut ties with Epstein-linked accounts,
resulting in Deutsche Bank paying a $150 million fine.
Deutsche Bank, unlike other financial institutions, failed to close all
of its accounts linked to Epstein until less than a month prior to his
arrest last year, even though the bank had identified him as “high
risk” years before.
Beyond the tragedy of Sunday’s shooting, which claimed the life of Salas’ only child, the quick discovery of the death of the main suspect,
Roy Den Hollander, of a “self-inflicted” gunshot to the head before he
could be arrested or questioned by authorities has led to speculation
that there is more to the official narrative of the crime than meets the
eye.
With law enforcement sources now claiming that Esther Salas was not
the intended target of the attack and some media reports now suggesting
that Den Hollander’s motive was related to his dislike of feminism, it
appears there are efforts underway to distance Sunday’s tragic shooting
from Salas’ recent assignment to the Epstein case, which occurred just four days before the tragic shooting.
The most likely reason for any such “damage control” effort lies in
the fact that both U.S. law enforcement investigations and mainstream
media reports have consistently downplayed the connections of Jeffrey
Epstein’s sexual trafficking and financial crimes to intelligence
agencies in the U.S. and Israel. Similarly, Roy Den Hollander previously
worked for a New York firm has been described as a “private CIA” with
ties to those countries’ intelligence agencies and, also, ties to
Deutsche Bank.
counterpunch | Our proposal is consistent with all the
principal undisputed facts concerning SARS-CoV-2 and its origin. The MMP
proposal has the additional benefit of reconciling many observations
concerning SARS-CoV-2 that have proven difficult to reconcile with any
natural zoonotic hypothesis.
For instance, using different approaches,
numerous researchers have concluded that the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein
has a very high affinity for the human ACE2 receptor (Walls et al., 2020; Piplani et al., 2020; Shang and Ye et al., 2020; Wrapp et al., 2020).
Such exceptional affinities, ten to twenty times as great as that of
the original SARS virus, do not arise at random, making it very hard to
explain in any other way than for the virus to have been strongly
selected in the presence of a human ACE2 receptor (Piplani et al., 2020).
In addition to this, a recent report found that the spike of RaTG13 binds the human ACE2 receptor (Shang and Ye et al., 2020).
We proposed above that the virus in the mine directly infected humans
lung cells. The main determinant of cell infection and species
specificity of coronaviruses is initial receptor binding (Perlman and Netland, 2009).
Thus RaTG13, unlike most bat coronaviruses, probably can enter and
infect human cells, providing biological plausibility to the idea that
the miners became infected with a coronavirus resembling RaTG13.
Moreover, the receptor binding domain
(RBD) of SARS-CoV-2, which is the region of the spike that physically
contacts the human ACE2 receptor, has recently been crystallised to
reveal its spatial structure (Shang and Ye et al., 2020).
These authors found close structural similarities between the spikes of
SARS-CoV-2 and RaTG13 in how they bound the human ACE2 receptor:
“Second, as with SARS-CoV-2, bat RaTG13
RBM [a region of the RBD] contains a similar four-residue motif in the
ACE2 binding ridge, supporting the notion that SARS-CoV-2 may have evolved from RaTG13 or a RaTG13-related bat coronavirus
(Extended Data Table 3 and Extended Data Fig. 7). Third, the L486F,
Y493Q and D501N residue changes from RaTG13 to SARS CoV-2 enhance ACE2
recognition and may have facilitated the bat-to-human transmission of
SARS-CoV-2 (Extended Data Table 3 and Extended Data Fig. 7). A
lysine-to-asparagine mutation at the 479 position in the SARS-CoV-2 RBD
(corresponding to the 493 position in the SARS-CoV-2 RBD) enabled
SARS-CoV to infect humans. Fourth, Leu455 contributes favourably to ACE2
recognition, and it is conserved between RaTG13 and SARS CoV-2; its
presence in the SARS CoV-2 RBM may be important for the bat-to-human
transmission of SARS-CoV-2″ (Shang and Ye et al., 2020). (italics added)
The significance of this molecular
similarity is very great. Coronaviruses have evolved a diverse set of
molecular solutions to solve the problem of binding ACE2 (Perlman and Netland, 2009; Forni et al., 2017). The fact that RaTG13 and SARS CoV-2 share the same solution makes RaTG13 a highly likely direct ancestor of Sars-CoV-2.
A further widely noted feature of SARS-CoV-2 is its furin site (Coutard et al., 2020).
This site is absent from RaTG13 and other closely related
coronaviruses. The most closely related virus with such a site is the
highly lethal MERS (which broke out in 2012). Possession of a furin site
enables SARS-CoV-2 (like MERS) to infect lungs and many other body
tissues (such as the gastrointestinal tract and neurons), explaining
much of its lethality (Hoffman et al., 2020; Lamers et al., 2020).
However, no convincing explanation for how SARS-CoV-2 acquired this
site has yet been offered. Our suggestion is that it arose due to the
high selection pressure which existed in the miner’s lungs and which in
general worked to ensure that the virus became highly adapted to the
lungs. This explanation, which encompasses how SARS-CoV-2 came to target
lung tissues in general, is an important aspect of our proposal.
The implication is therefore that the
furin site was not acquired by recombination with another coronavirus
and simply represents convergent evolution (as suggested by Andersen et al., 2020).
An intriguing alternative possibility is
that SARS-CoV-2 acquired its furin site directly from the miner’s lungs.
Humans possess an epithelial sodium channel protein called ENaC-a whose
furin cleavage site is identical over eight amino acids to SARS-CoV-2 (Anand et al., 2020).
ENaC-a protein is present in the same airway epithelial and lung
tissues infected by SARS-CoV-2. It is known from plants that
positive-stranded RNA viruses recombine readily with host mRNAs (Greene and Allison, 1994; Greene and Allison, 1996; Lommel and Xiong, 1991; Borja et al., 2007).
The same evidence base is not available for positive-stranded animal
RNA viruses, (though see Gorbalenya, 1992) but if plant viruses are a
guide then acquisition of its furin site via recombination with the mRNA
which encodes ENaC-a by SARS-CoV-2 is a strong possibility.
A further feature of SARS-CoV-2 has been the very limited adaptive evolution of its genome since the pandemic began (Zhan et al., 2020; van Dorp et al., 2020; Starr et al., 2020).
It is a well-established principle that viruses that jump species
undergo accelerated evolutionary change in their new host (e.g. Baric et al., 1997). Thus, SARS and MERS (both coronaviruses) underwent rapid and readily detectable adaptation to their new human hosts (Forni et al., 2017; Dudas and Rambaut, 2016).
Such an adaptation period has not been observed for SARS-CoV-2 even
though it has now infected many more individuals than SARS or MERS did.
This has even led to suggestions that the SARS-CoV-2 virus had a period
of cryptic circulation in humans infections that predated the pandemic (Chaw et al., 2020).
The sole mutation consistently observed to accumulate across multiple
studies is a D614G substitution in the spike protein (e.g. Korber et al., 2020).
The numerically largest analysis of SARS-CoV-2 genomes, however, found
no evidence at all for adaptive evolution, even for D614G (van Dorp et al., 2020).
The general observation is therefore that
Sars-CoV-2 has remained functionally unchanged or virtually so (except
for inconsequential genetic changes) since the pandemic began. This is a
very important observation. It implies that SARS-CoV-2 is highly
adapted across its whole set of component proteins and not just at the
spike (Zhan et al., 2020). That is to say, its evolutionary leap to humans was completed before the 2019 pandemic began.
It is hard to imagine an explanation for this high adaptiveness other than some kind of passaging in a human body (Zhan et al., 2020). Not even passaging in human cells could have achieved such an outcome.
Two examples illustrate this point. In a follow up to Shang and Ye et al., (2020),
a similar group of Minnesota researchers identified a distinct strategy
by which the spike (S) protein (which contains the receptor bind
domain; RBD) of SARS-CoV-2 evades the human immune system (Shang and Wan et al., 2020).
This strategy involves more effective hiding of its RBD, but it implies
again that the spike and the RBD evolved in tandem and in the presence
of the human immune system (i.e. in a human body and not in tissue
culture).
The Andersen authors, in their critique of
a possible engineered origin for SARS-CoV-2, also stress the need for
passaging in whole humans:
“Finally, the generation of the predicted
O-linked glycans is also unlikely to have occurred during cell-culture
passage, as such features suggest the involvement of an immune system” (Andersen et al., 2020).
The final point that we would like to make
is that the principal zoonotic origin thesis is the one proposed by
Andersen et al. Apart from being poorly supported this thesis is very
complex. It requires two species jumps, at least two recombination
events between quite distantly related coronaviruses and the physical
transfer of a pangolin (having a coronavirus infection) from outside
China (Andersen et al., 2020).
Even then it provides no logical explanation of the adaptedness of
SARS-CoV-2 across its whole genome or why the virus emerged in Wuhan.
By contrast, our MMP proposal requires
only the one species jump, which is documented in the Master’s thesis.
Although we do not rule out a possible role for mixed infections in the
lungs of the miners, nor the possibility of recombination between
closely related variants in those lungs, nor the potential acquisition
of the furin site from a host mRNA, only mutation was needed to derive
SARS-CoV-2 from RaTG13. Hence our attention earlier to the figure from P. Zhou et al., 2020showing that RaTG13 is the most closely related virus to SARS-CoV-2 over its entire length. This extended similarity is perfectly consistent with a mutational origin of SARS-CoV-2 from RaTG13.
In short, the MMP theory is a plausible
and parsimonious explanation of all the key features of the COVID-19
pandemic and its origin. It accounts for the propensity of SARS-CoV-2
infections to target the lungs; the apparent preadapted nature of the
virus; and its transmission from bats in Yunnan to humans in Wuhan.
Kitty, I Farted
-
Hello Loves
In France, ChatGPT is phonetically similar to *Chat, Je pete, *which means
female cat (kitty), I farted. New programs are worrying over jobs ...
April Three
-
4/3
43
When 1 = A and 26 = Z
March = 43
What day?
4 to the power of 3 is 64
64th day is March 5
My birthday
March also has 5 letters.
4 x 3 = 12
...
Return of the Magi
-
Lately, the Holy Spirit is in the air. Emotional energy is swirling out of
the earth.I can feel it bubbling up, effervescing and evaporating around
us, s...
New Travels
-
Haven’t published on the Blog in quite a while. I at least part have been
immersed in the area of writing books. My focus is on Science Fiction an
Historic...
Covid-19 Preys Upon The Elderly And The Obese
-
sciencemag | This spring, after days of flulike symptoms and fever, a man
arrived at the emergency room at the University of Vermont Medical Center.
He ...