Throughout October, there have been an average of 1,564 extra deaths
per week, compared with a weekly average of just 315 in 2020 and 1,322
in 2021.
Latest figures from the Office for National Statistics (ONS) showed
that in the week ending Oct 21, there were 1,714 excess deaths in
England and Wales, of which only 469 were due to Covid - just 27 per
cent of the total.
It is 16.8 per cent higher than normal. Deaths are also running
higher than the five-year pre-Covid October average from 2015 to 2019,
figures showed.
Health experts have warned that some of the unexplained deaths are being caused by collateral damage from the pandemic, when operations and treatments were cancelled or delayed as the health service concentrated on Covid.
The Government’s “stay at home, protect the NHS” message also left many people who needed medical treatment unwilling to bother the health service, or afraid they would catch coronavirus if they went into hospital.
The NHS is also struggling from long-term staffing issues and current shortages because of coronavirus, leading to record waits for ambulances, treatment and surgery.
Dr Charles Levinson, of the private GP service DoctorCall, which has
seen a rise in patients presenting with advanced conditions, said: “What
is driving the excess death crisis? In my view, delays in
diagnosis/treatment now and throughout the pandemic.
CTH | It is hard to think the unthinkable – but there comes a time when
there’s nothing else for it. People raised to trust the powers that be –
who have assumed, like I once did, that the State, regardless of its
political flavour at any given moment, is essentially benevolent and
well-meaning – will naturally try and keep that assumption of
benevolence in mind when trying to make sense of what is going on around
them.
People like us, you and me, raised in the understanding that we are
free, that we have inalienable rights, and that the institutions of this
country have our best interests at heart, will tend to tie ourselves in
knots rather than contemplate the idea those authorities might actually
be working against us now. I took that thought of benevolent,
well-meaning authority for granted for most of my life, God help me. Not
to put too fine a point on it, I was as gullible as the next chump.
A couple of years ago, however, I began to think the unthinkable and
with every passing day it becomes more and more obvious to me that we
are no longer being treated as individuals entitled to try and make the
most of our lives – but as a barn full of battery hens, just another
product to be bought and sold – sold down the river.
Let me put it another way: if you have been driving yourself almost
demented in an effort to think the best of those in charge – those in
senior positions in government, those in charge of the great
institutions of State, those running the big corporations – but finding
it increasingly impossible to do so … then the solution to the problem
might be to turn your point of view through 180 degrees and accept,
however unwillingly, that we are … how best to put this … being taken
for a ride.
When you find a stranger’s hand on your wallet, in the inside pocket
of your jacket … rather than trying to persuade yourself he’s only
making sure it doesn’t fall out … it might be more straightforward to
draw the conclusion you’re in the process of being robbed.
Once the scales fall from a person’s eyes, the resultant clarity of
sight is briefly overwhelming. Or it is like being handed a skeleton key
that opens every locked door, or access to a Rosetta Stone that
translates every word into a language instantly understood.
Take the energy crisis: If you’ve felt the blood drain from your face
at the prospect of bills rising from hundreds to several thousands of
pounds while reading about energy companies doubling their profits
overnight while being commanded to subsidise so-called renewables that
are anything but Green while listening to this politician or that renew
their vows to the ruinous fantasies of Net Zero and Agenda 2030 while
knowing that the electricity for electric cars comes, in the main and
most reliably, from fossil fuels if you can’t make sense of it all and
just know that it adds up to a future in which you might have to choose
between eating and heating then treat yourself to the gift of
understanding that the powers that be fully intend that we should have
less heat and less fuel and that in the planned future only the rich
will have cars anyway. The plan is not to fix it.
The plan is to break it, and leave it broken. If you struggle to
think the best of the world’s richest – vacuous, self-obsessed A-list
celebrities among them – endlessly circling the planet on private jets
and super yachts, so as to attend get-togethers where they might
pontificate to us lowly proles about how we must give up our cars and
occasional holiday flights – even meat on the dinner table … if you
wonder how they have the unmitigated gall … then isn’t it easier simply
to accept that their honestly declared and advertised intention is that
their luxurious and pampered lives will continue as before while we are
left hungry, cold and mostly unwashed in our unheated homes.
Here’s the thing: if any leader or celeb honestly meant a word of their sermons about CO2 and
the rest, then they would obviously lead by example. They would be
first of all of us willingly to give up international travel altogether …
they would downsize to modest homes warmed by heat pumps. They would
eschew all energy but that from the sun and the wind. They would eat,
with relish, bugs and plants. They would resort to walking, bicycles and
public transport.
If Net Zero and the rest was about the good of the planet – and not
about clearing the skies and the beaches of scum like us – don’t you
think those sainted politicians and A-listers would be lighting the way
for us by their own example? If the way of life they preach to us was
worth living, wouldn’t they be living it already? Perhaps you heard Bill
Gates say private jets are his guilty pleasure.
And how about food – and more particularly the predicted shortage of
it: the suits and CEOs blame it all on Vladimir Putin. But if the
countries of the world are truly running out of food, why is our
government offering farmers hundreds of thousands of pounds to get out
of the industry and sell their land to transnational corporations for
use, or disuse unknown? Why aren’t we, as a society, doing what our
parents and grandparents did during WWII and digging for victory? Why is
the government intent on turning a third of our fertile soil over to
re-wilding schemes that make life better only for the beavers? Why
aren’t we looking across the North Sea towards the Netherlands where a
WEF-infected administration is bullying farmers off their land
altogether, forcing them to cull half the national herd.
Those Dutch farmers are among the most productive and knowledgeable
in the world, holding in their heads and hands the answers to all manner
of questions about how best to produce food, and yet their government
is so intent on scaring them out of the business that a teenage boy in a
tractor, taking part in a protest to defend ancient rights and
traditions, was fired on by police.
Why do you think it matters so much, to the government of the second
most productive population of farmers in the world, to gut and fillet
that industry? Why? Why have similar protests, in countries all across
Europe and the wider world, been largely ignored by the mainstream media
– a media that would have crawled on its hands and knees over broken
glass just to report on a BLM protester opening a bag of non-binary
crisps. Why the silence on the attack on farming?
MSDNC | The high potency cannabis that is now widely available may
raise the risk of both psychosis and addiction, a report published
Monday in The Lancet Psychiatry finds.
The
potency of cannabis — measured by how much THC is found in the product —
has been rising for nearly half a century, increasing by approximately
0.29% each year from 1970 to 2017, according to earlier research. THC is the chemical in cannabis responsible for its psychoactive effects.
That change could have important implications for public health, experts say.
“With the increasing strength of cannabis
available in the U.S. and around the globe, it’s important to
understand the long-term health outcomes that might be associated with
using these types of products as compared to what has traditionally been
available,” said Ziva Cooper, director of the UCLA Center for Cannabis
and Cannabinoids.
In
Monday’s study, researchers analyzed data from 20 studies that included
a total of nearly 120,000 cannabis users. They found that people with a
first episode of cannabis-related psychosis were much more likely to
have been using a product with high levels of THC than a product with
low levels of the intoxicating chemical. Those using high potency weed
were also much more likely to become addicted, compared to those who
used low potency cannabis.
consentfactory | The masses are like actors being forced to emotionally invest in the
“reality” of an absurdist stage play. The more they repeat the
performance, the more convincing the fictional “reality” becomes,
regardless of how patently absurd it is … and it is becoming more and
more absurd.
Meanwhile, Germany’s Federal Ministry of Health was forced to publish
a limited hangout regarding “vaccination” injuries and deaths. They did
it classic Goebbelsian fashion.
Tens of thousands in Germany seriously injured by a "vaccination" they did not need, but that they were coerced into taking by government lies, gaslighting, intimidation, segregation, etc. You would think this might be a story that investigative journalists would want to cover. pic.twitter.com/WCJRBkfYHa
Apparently, they didn’t like the actual data on the number of serious
adverse effects, so they decided to just lie about them on Twitter.
(Serious adverse effects were reported in roughly 1 in 5,000 doses,
not 1 in 5,000 “vaccinated” people. Approximately 184,000,000 doses
have been administered to people in Germany and … well, you can do the
math.) Naturally,
the Twitter Corporation has been slapping its fake “misleading” warning
on retweets pointing out the Ministry of Health’s lie, because the truth is whatever the Corporatocracy says it is, and everything else is “disinformation.”
If you think I’m being harsh or hyperbolic in characterizing the
Ministry’s lie as a lie, keep in mind that the German Minister of
Health, Karl Lauterbach, has been lying, repeatedly, to the German
public for over two years now. Here he is lying about the
“side-effects-free vaccines” in August 2021, right around the time he
ordered the segregation of “the Unvaccinated” and fomented hatred of
anyone who refused to conform to New Normal ideology …
For the record, here's @Karl_Lauterbach, the Minister of Health of New Normal Germany, lying to the public about a "side-effect-free vaccination" shortly before he ordered the segregation of "the Unvaccinated" and fomented hatred of anyone who refused to mindlessly follow orders. pic.twitter.com/hLCiqnCDSV
And now, tens of thousands of people in Germany — at minimum, as
vaccine adverse-effects have always been significantly under-reported —
have been seriously injured or … you know, killed, because Karl and his
fascistic New Normal cronies lied to everyone, over and over, and the
German media repeated those lies, and the New Normal masses repeated
those lies, and the government and global corporations censored,
deplatformed, and demonized those of us who challenged those lies as
“far-right extremists,” “science deniers,” “anti-vaxxers,” and so on.
And these are just a few recent examples. I don’t think I need to
provide an exhaustive list. At this point, you are either well aware and
capable of facing what’s happening, or you’re not, in which case you
are telling yourself whatever you need to tell yourself in order to
pretend that what is happening isn’t happening.
Your betters are simply letting Nature take its course, with a little encouragement.
There’s a problem with human overpopulation.
Why not let it self correct
when there’s so much money to be made and power to be had doing so?
Look who it’s killing (so far), the old and the weak.
Eliminating the useless and unfit, putting Social Security on a sound financial basis.
Real benefits for society!
As long as the virus doesn’t mutate into something really nasty, and as
long as it doesn’t inconvenience too many people that matter,
everything will be just fine....,
expose | UK Government confirms the Triple / Quadruple Vaccinated account for 91% of all COVID Deaths since the beginning of 2022
In January, the vaccinated accounted for 85% of
Covid-19 deaths, whilst the unvaccinated accounted for 15%. By March,
the vaccinated accounted for 93% of Covid-19 deaths, whilst the
vaccinated accounted for just 7%. And by May, the vaccinated accounted
for 94% of Covid-19 deaths, whilst the vaccinated accounted for just 6%.
Many people may believe that this is simply because, according to
data published by the UK Health Security Agency, 50% of the population
of England refused the third jab, and those vaccinated deaths are among
the double vaccinated and partly vaccinated. But unfortunately, those
people are wrong.
Overall, there were 15,113 Covid-19 deaths by 31st May 2022, and a
shocking 13,666 of those deaths were among the vaccinated population.
But what’s even more shocking than this is that 12,442 of those deaths
were among the triple/quadruple vaccinated population.
This means the triple/quadruple vaccinated population have
accounted for a frightening 91% of all Covid-19 deaths among the
vaccinated since the beginning of 2022.
expose-news | Dr. Nathan Wolfe was a founding citizen of Ghislaine Maxwell’s
TerraMar Project; a member of the Edge Foundation; a self-proclaimed
“virus hunter” whose area of research is zoonotic diseases with a
special focus on bats; with links to the Wuhan Institute of Virology and
EcoHealth Alliance; who previously bungled epidemic responses while
selling pandemic insurance; whose company Metabiota which is funded by
Rosemont Seneca, Google, The Skoll Foundation, among others, was awarded
a sub-contract with the US Military’s DTRA program for work in
Ukrainian biolabs.
A few days before the end of March
Russian Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Marija Zakharova published a
timeline of US-Ukraine bioresearch headed “BioBiden.” Of the 23
timeline points she listed, Nathan Wolfe or organisations associated
with him – Metabiota and Global Viral – were explicitly mentioned in 8
of them:
2007 – US DoD employee Nathan Wolfe founded Global Viral
Forecasting Institute (subsequently – Global Viral), a biomedical
company. The mission stated in the charter is non-commercial study of
transborder infections, including in China.
2014 – Metabiota, a
private commercial organisation specialising in the study of pandemic
risks is detached from Global Viral. Neil Callahan and John DeLoche,
employees of Hunter Biden’s company Rosemont Seneca Partners are
appointed to the board of Metabiota. Global Viral and Metabiota begin to
get funding from the US Department of Defence.
2014 – Metabiota
shows interest in Ukraine and invites Hunter Biden to “assert Ukraine’s
cultural & economic independence from Russia”.
2014 – Metabiota and Burisma Holdings begin cooperation on an unnamed “science project in Ukraine”.
2014
– Metabiota, Global Viral and Black & Veatch Special Projects begin
full-fledged cooperation within the US DoD programmes.
2014-2016 – Implementation of Metabiota and US DoD contracts, including a $300,000 project in Ukraine.
2016 – former US Assistant Secretary for Defence Andrew Weber is appointed head of Metabiota’s global partnerships department.
2016
– EcoHealth Alliance, a Global Viral founder Nathan Wolfe’s structure,
is engaged in the study of bat-transmitted coronaviruses at the research
centre in a Wuhan laboratory, China.
Considering the accusation is US
political elites’ involvement in the military biological activity in
Ukraine, it perhaps indicates Moscow has identified Nathan Wolfe as a
person of interest in what Zakharova termed “this truly diabolical
plan.”
“If an alien
visited Earth, they would take some note of humans, but probably spend
most of their time trying to understand the dominant form of life on our
planet –microorganisms like bacteria and viruses.”
Nathan Wolfe, Business Continuity and The Pandemic Threat Robert A Clark (2016)
From 1999 to 2006 Wolfe conducted
research as a postdoctoral student and then as an assistant professor at
Johns Hopkins University. There he worked with American epidemiologist
Donald Burke, who suspected that the practice of hunting bushmeat in
Africa had exposed a source of HIV. Based in Cameroon, Wolfe studied the
local hunters and their hunting practices. In 2004 he and his
colleagues found that 1% of bushmeat hunters were infected with the
simian foamy virus – a virus that is closely related to HIV and carried
by nonhuman primates.
In 2006 he joined the department of
epidemiology at the University of California, Los Angeles. He began
pursuing ways to monitor, predict, and prevent animal-to-human transfer
of viruses and conducted projects in Africa and Southeast Asia. In
China, he collaborated with scientists to investigate wet markets (food
markets that sell live animals) as a source of zoonoses (diseases from
wild animals).
dailymail | A woman who stopped to help after a truck
carrying 100 lab monkeys crashed in Pennsylvania fears she's caught an
illness after one of the macaques hissed in her face, leaving her with
pink eye symptoms.
Michelle Fallon,
from Danville near Scranton, was driving directly behind the vehicle
when it crashed, throwing animal crates all over the highway and
smashing some to pieces. Three of the macaques escaped and went on the
run, but all have since been captured and humanely euthanized. All of
the other monkeys - who'd arrived in the US from Mauritius that morning,
and were en route to a lab, have been accounted for.
Fallon has now had a rabies shot, and wrote about the symptoms she has since suffered on Facebook - and also told PA Homepage that she'd developed symptoms of pink eye - an inflammation or infection of the eye ball.
She
said: 'I was close to the monkeys, I touched the crates, I walked
through their feces so I was very close. So I called (a helpline) to
inquire, you know, was I safe?
'Because the monkey did hiss at me and there were feces around, and I did have an open cut, they just want to be precautious.'
Fallon
said she got out to help both the driver and the animals in their
cages, initially believing them to be cats. When she approached and put
her hand on the cage, she says the monkey hissed at her.
The
day following the accident, Fallon suddenly developed a cough and pink
eye, which became so bad that she had to visit the emergency room at
Geisinger Medical Center in Danville. Fist tap Dale.
wired |In the first days of the
new year, on the marshy coastal edge of South Carolina’s Lowcountry, a
hunter shot an American widgeon, a rusty-fronted duck with a pale beak
and a brilliant green stripe. This was not a big deal; the state’s duck
hunting season runs from Thanksgiving through the end of January.
Neither was what happened next: Before taking it home, the hunter let a
wildlife biologist affiliated with a government program swab the carcass
for lab analysis.
But what happened after that
was a big deal indeed. After the sample went through its routine check
at Clemson University, it made an unusual second stop at a federal lab
halfway across the country, in Iowa. The news of what was in the sample
percolated through a pyramid of agencies, and on January 14 the US
Department of Agriculture revealed why it had attracted
so much scrutiny: The South Carolina duck was carrying the Asian strain
of H5N1 avian influenza, the first sighting of that pathogen in the
continental US in years.
But not the last. Just a few days later, the USDA disclosed that two more birds
shot by hunters also carried the same pathogen: a teal, shot in the
same South Carolina county, and a northern shoveler shot in the far
northeast corner of North Carolina, about 400 miles away. The virus in
all three was what is known as highly pathogenic—meaning it could cause
fast-moving, fatal disease in other bird species, such as poultry,
though it was not making the ducks ill.
Three
birds out of the millions that American hunters shoot each year might
seem like nothing—but the findings have sent a ripple of disquiet
through the community of scientists who monitor animal diseases. In
2015, that same strain of flu landed in the Midwest’s turkey industry
and caused the largest animal-disease outbreak
ever seen in the US, killing or causing the destruction of more than 50
million birds and costing the US economy more than $3 billion.
Human-health experts are uneasy as well. Since 2003, that flu has sickened at least 863 people across the world and killed more than half of them. Other avian flu strains have made hundreds more people ill. Before Covid arrived, avian flu was considered the disease most likely to cause a transnational outbreak.
It
is far too soon to say whether the arrival of this virus in the US is a
blip, an imminent danger to agriculture, or a zoonotic pathogen probing
for a path to attack humanity. But it is a reminder that Covid is not
the only disease with pandemic potential, and of how easy it is to lose
focus when it comes to other possible threats. The possibility of a
human- or animal-origin strain of flu swamping the world once seemed so
imminent that back in 2005 the White House wrote a national strategy for
it. But researchers say the surveillance schemes that would pick up its
movement have since been allowed to drift.
“In
wildlife disease surveillance, we’re always chasing a crisis,” says
David Stallknecht, director of the Southeastern Cooperative Wildlife
Disease Study, a research institute housed at the University of Georgia.
“And as soon as the crisis is over, the interest goes down. It’s
difficult to keep going long-term. People are here to do the work, but
the money isn't there to support it.”
themarshallproject |“Tell Your Children: The Truth About Marijuana, Mental Illness,
and Violence” is an intensively researched and passionate dissent from
the now prevailing view that marijuana is relatively harmless. The book
is a “bullhorn” (his word) for scientists and physicians whose research
has, he argues, been drowned out by the triumphal cheers of the
marijuana lobby.
He exchanged emails with TMP’s Bill Keller.
The Marshall Project: Alex, you’re really swimming
against the tide. Both public opinion and the law have moved
dramatically in favor of marijuana, and you’re arguing that pot is
connected to psychosis and violent crime. Before we get to your
evidence, what drew you to this subject?
Alex Berenson: My wife Jacqueline is a forensic
psychiatrist. She evaluates the criminally mentally ill. She told me
that nearly all her patients had used marijuana heavily, many at the
times of their crimes. At first I didn't really believe her—stupidly—but
she encouraged me to evaluate the evidence myself. And the more I read,
the more I realized she was right. Marijuana drives a surprising amount
of psychosis, and psychosis—besides being a terrible burden for
sufferers and their families—is a shockingly high risk for violent
crime.
TMP: Last I checked, 33 states and the District of
Columbia had legalized marijuana specifically for medicinal purposes.
Doctors are apparently prescribing pot for pain, Parkinson’s, PTSD,
epilepsy, multiple sclerosis and most recently some forms of autism. Pot
has been held out as an answer to the opioid crisis—pain relief without
the risk of a lethal overdose. Are you saying all these politicians and
doctors are deluded?
AB: This question fundamentally misunderstands
medical marijuana. The confusion is not surprising, as the cannabis
advocacy community has done everything possible to confuse the way
medical legalization works in practice. Marijuana is not "prescribed"
for anything. It can't be, because the FDA has never approved it to
treat any disease, and there is little evidence that smoked cannabis or
THC extracts help any of the diseases you mention, except pain.
Physicians "authorize" its use, usually after very short visits by
patients who have come to them specifically to receive an authorization
card. By far the most common conditions for which medical marijuana is
authorized are pain and self-reported psychiatric conditions such as
anxiety and insomnia, not diseases such as Parkinson's.
After receiving an authorization card, "patients" can then buy as
much marijuana as they like for a year for any reason they choose.
Nearly all were recreational users before they became "patients." And
there is no difference between medical and recreational marijuana. They
are the same drug. Further, the vast majority of physicians will not
write authorizations, at least according to the states that keep track
of physician authorizations. A tiny number of doctors—so-called "pot
doctors"—write nearly all of them.
In other words, in nearly all cases, medical legalization is simply a
backdoor way to protect recreational users from arrest. This has been a
terrible mistake, mainly because it has further confused the public
about marijuana's relative risks and benefits.
TMP: Your other—perhaps more contentious—conclusion
is that marijuana may contribute to increases in violent crime. As you
know, establishing causal links between crime rates and, well, anything,
is extremely tricky. What convinced you that pot is a culprit?
AB: Psychosis is a known factor for violent crime.
People with schizophrenia commit violent crime at rates far higher than
healthy people - their homicide rates are about 20 times as high. Worse,
they commit most of that crime while they are under the influence.
Since cannabis causes paranoia—not even advocates dispute that fact—and
psychosis, it is not surprising that it would drive violent crime. And
in fact there are a number of good studies showing that users have
significantly higher violence rates than non-users. Further, in
researching the book, I found many, many cases where the causation
appeared clear. In some cases it was as simple and obvious as, this person—with no history of violence—smoked, became psychotic, and committed a homicide.
TMP: You write that you don’t believe people should
go to prison for using marijuana. How should the law deal with pot?
Should it be regulated? Should it carry a warning label?
neurosciencenews |Summary: Cannabis use leads to cognitive impairments that extend beyond the period of intoxication.
Source: Society for the Study of Addiction
A systematic review published today in the scientific journal Addiction has found that cannabis use leads to acute cognitive impairments that may continue beyond the period of intoxication.
This
Canadian-led meta-review (review of reviews) merged the findings of 10
meta-analyses representing more than 43,000 participants.
The study found that cannabis intoxication leads to small to moderate cognitive impairments in areas including:
making decisions,
suppressing inappropriate responses,
learning through reading and listening,
the ability to remember what one reads or hears, and
“Cannabis use in youth may consequently lead to reduced educational
attainment, and, in adults, to poor work performance and dangerous
driving. These consequences may be worse in regular and heavy users.”
Cannabis
is the third most consumed psychoactive substance in the world (after
alcohol and nicotine) and adolescents as well as young adults have the
highest rates of cannabis use.
Recent
global changes in the legalization of cannabis suggest that public
perceptions of its safety and acceptability are on the rise.
rwmalonemd | Before you vaccinate your child, which is irreversible and
potentially permanently damaging, find out why 16,000 physicians and
medical scientists around the world signed a declaration publicly
declaring that healthy children should NOT be vaccinated for COVID-19.
On behalf of these MDs and PhDs, I have published a clear statement
outlining the scientific facts behind this decision.
My
name is Robert Malone, and I am speaking to you as a parent,
grandparent, physician and scientist. I don’t usually read from a
prepared speech, but this is so important that I wanted to make sure
that I get every single word and scientific fact correct.
I stand
by this statement with a career dedicated to vaccine research and
development. I’m vaccinated for COVID and I'm generally pro-vaccination.
I have devoted my entire career to developing safe and effective ways
to prevent and treat infectious diseases.
After this, I will be posting the text of this statement so you can share it with your friends and family.
Before
you inject your child - a decision that is irreversible - I wanted to
let you know the scientific facts about this genetic vaccine, which is based on the mRNA vaccine technology I created:
There are three issues parents need to understand:
The
first is that a viral gene will be injected into your children's cells.
This gene forces your child’s body to make toxic spike proteins. These
proteins often cause permanent damage in children’s critical organs,
including
Their brain and nervous system
Their heart and blood vessels, including blood clots
Their reproductive system
And this vaccine can trigger fundamental changes to their immune system
The most alarming point about this is that once these damages have occurred, they are irreparable
You can’t fix the lesions within their brain
You can’t repair heart tissue scarring
You can’t repair a genetically reset immune system, and
This vaccine can cause reproductive damage that could affect future generations of your family
The second thing you need to know about is the fact that this novel technology has not been adequately tested.
We need at least 5 years of testing/research before we can really understand the risks
Harms and risks from new medicines often become revealed many years later
Ask yourself if you want your own child to be part of the most radical medical experiment in human history
One final point: the reason they’re giving you to vaccinate your child is a lie.
Your children represent no danger to their parents or grandparents
It’s actually the opposite. Their immunity, after getting COVID, is
critical to save your family if not the world from this disease
In
summary: there is no benefit for your children or your family to be
vaccinating your children against the small risks of the virus, given
the known health risks of the vaccine that as a parent, you and your
children may have to live with for the rest of their lives.
The risk/benefit analysis isn’t even close.
As a parent and grandparent, my recommendation to you is to resist and fight to protect your children.
“Upon admission to a once-trusted hospital, American patients with
COVID-19 become virtual prisoners, subjected to a rigid treatment
protocol…for rationing medical care in those over age 50. They have a
shockingly high mortality rate…”
“As exposed in audio recordings, hospital executives in Arizona
admitted meeting several times a week to lower standards of care, with
coordinated restrictions on visitation rights. Most COVID-19 patients’
families are deliberately kept in the dark about what is really being
done to their loved ones.”
“The combination that enables this tragic and avoidable loss of
hundreds of thousands of lives includes (1) The CARES Act, which
provides hospitals with bonus incentive payments for all things related
to COVID-19 (testing, diagnosing, admitting to hospital, use of
remdesivir and ventilators, reporting COVID-19 deaths, and vaccinations)
and (2) waivers of customary and long-standing patient rights by the
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS).”
“In 2020, the Texas Hospital Association submitted requests for
waivers to CMS. According to Texas attorney Jerri Ward, ‘CMS has granted
“waivers” of federal law regarding patient rights. Specifically, CMS
purports to allow hospitals to violate the rights of patients or their
surrogates with regard to medical record access, to have patient
visitation, and to be free from seclusion.’…The purported waivers are
meant to isolate and gain total control over the patient and to deny
patient and patient’s decision-maker the ability to exercise informed
consent.”
“Creating a ‘National Pandemic Emergency’ provided justification for
such sweeping actions that override individual physician medical
decision-making and patients’ rights. The CARES Act provides incentives
for hospitals to use treatments dictated solely by the federal
government under the auspices of the NIH. These ‘bounties’ must paid
back if not ‘earned’ by making the COVID-19 diagnosis and following the
COVID-19 protocol.”
“The hospital payments include:
* A ‘free’ required PCR test in the Emergency Room or upon admission for every patient, with government-paid fee to hospital.
* Added bonus payment for each positive COVID-19 diagnosis.
* Another bonus for a COVID-19 admission to the hospital.
* A 20 percent ‘boost’ bonus payment from Medicare on the entire
hospital bill for use of remdesivir instead of medicines such as
Ivermectin.
* Another and larger bonus payment to the hospital if a COVID-19 patient is mechanically ventilated.
* More money to the hospital if cause of death is listed as COVID-19, even if patient did not die directly of COVID-19.
* A COVID-19 diagnosis also provides extra payments to coroners.”
“CMS implemented ‘value-based’ payment programs that track data such
as how many workers at a healthcare facility receive a COVID-19 vaccine.
Now we see why many hospitals implemented COVID-19 vaccine mandates.
They are paid more.”
“Outside hospitals, physician MIPS [Merit-based Incentive Payment
System] quality metrics link doctors’ income to performance-based pay
for treating patients with COVID-19 EUA drugs. Failure to report
information to CMS can cost the physician 4% of reimbursement.”
“Because of obfuscation with medical coding and legal jargon, we
cannot be certain of the actual amount each hospital receives per
COVID-19 patient. But Attorney Thomas Renz and CMS whistleblowers have
calculated a total payment of at least $100,000 per patient.” Fist tap Big Don.
wmcresearch | One may view the actions of the spike protein by reversing a well-worn saying:
“If you give a man a fish, you feed him for a day. If you teach a man to fish, you feed him for a lifetime.”
The Spike prefers:
“If you stop a cell from repairing itself, it just dies. If you teach
the host to stop repairing itself, you rob it of its lifetime.”
On May 31st of this year, researchers in Israel discovered
the Fountain of Youth. They observed that SIRT6 controls the rate of
healthy aging. If you increase this, the mice live for an average of
THIRTY PERCENT LONGER. So, imagine 130 being the new 100. SIXTY being
the new THIRTY! LITERALLY!
An interesting observation was also made by the team: “If we can
determine how to activate it in humans, we will be able to prolong life,
and this could have enormous health and economic implications."
Enormous implications, indeed. Clearly there are those who certainly
DO NOT want Seven Billion people living an extra thirty years…
So, what happens if you REMOVE SIRT6? You guessed it. Very, very bad things happen. Especially death.
Without SIRT6 your body is unable to repair the DNA damage that we
experience every day, and which is ENORMOUSLY increased in states of
disease, particularly so in the case of SARS-CoV-2.
THE ENDOTHELIAL SENESCENCE CONNECTION
It has been established that endothelial cells become senescent when
transfected with the Spike Protein. They have not determined WHY it
happens, just that it DOES HAPPEN and the effects it has. I now know why
it happens. The Spike Protein is epigenetically silencing SIRT6.
What does SIRT6 do, in addition to controlling DNA repair?
DNA Repair, Gene Expression, Telomeric Maintenance, Mitosis and
Meiosis, Stem Cell Pluripotency and Differentiation (how cells obtain
their specific functionality), Metablic Diseases (Diabetes, for
example), Cancer, Immune Regulation, Stress Response, Senescence and
Aging.
Everything COVID and Long COVID.
It has already been hypothesized that Sirtuins are implicated in
COVID. In a paper on COVID and related Sepsis it was determined that
Metformin may improve metabolic derangements, improve mitochondrial
function, and decrease cytokine production. NAD+ boosters such as
resveratrol, a naturally occurring polyphenol, found in red grapes and
blueberries, activate Sirtuin activity and attenuate the NF-ĸB activity,
improve endothelial function, and decrease microvascular inflammation.
SIRT1 is also implicated in COVID: COVID-19: NAD+ deficiency may
predispose the aged, obese and type2 diabetics to mortality through its
effect on SIRT1 activity
But, what are the possible long term implications? Organisms that are
deprived of their natural SIRT6 have very, very short lifespans. Mice,
for example, die within four weeks without SIRT6.
alexberenson |This chart may seem unbelievable or impossible, but it's correct, based on weekly data from the British government.
The brown line represents weekly deaths from all causes of vaccinated people aged 10-59, per 100,000 people.
The blue line represents weekly deaths from all causes of unvaccinated people per 100,000 in the same age range.
I have checked the underlying dataset myself and this graph is
correct. Vaccinated people under 60 are twice as likely to die as
unvaccinated people. And overall deaths in Britain are running well
above normal.
I don’t know how to explain this other than vaccine-caused mortality.
CDC | This data visualization presents provisional counts for drug overdose
deaths based on a current flow of mortality data in the National Vital
Statistics System. Counts for the most recent final annual data are
provided for comparison. National provisional counts include deaths
occurring within the 50 states and the District of Columbia as of the
date specified and may not include all deaths that occurred during a
given time period. Provisional counts are often incomplete and causes of
death may be pending investigation (see Technical notes)
resulting in an underestimate relative to final counts. To address
this, methods were developed to adjust provisional counts for reporting
delays by generating a set of predicted provisional counts (see Technical notes).
The provisional data presented in this visualization include: (a) the
reported and predicted provisional counts of deaths due to drug
overdose occurring nationally and in each jurisdiction; (b) a U.S. map
of the percentage changes in provisional drug overdose deaths for the
current 12 month-ending period compared with the 12-month period ending
in the same month of the previous year, by jurisdiction; and (c) the
reported and predicted provisional counts of drug overdose deaths
involving specific drugs or drug classes occurring nationally and in
selected jurisdictions. The reported and predicted provisional counts
represent the numbers of deaths due to drug overdose occurring in the
12-month periods ending in the month indicated. These counts include all
seasons of the year and are insensitive to variations by seasonality.
Deaths are reported by the jurisdiction in which the death occurred.
Several data quality metrics, including the percent completeness in
overall death reporting, percentage of deaths with cause of death
pending further investigation, and the percentage of drug overdose
deaths with specific drugs or drug classes reported are included to aid
in interpretation of provisional data as these measures are related to
the accuracy of provisional counts (see Technical notes).
Reporting of the specific drugs and drug classes involved in drug
overdose deaths varies by jurisdiction, and comparisons of death rates
involving specific drugs across selected jurisdictions should not be
made (see Technical notes). Provisional data presented in this visualization will be updated on a monthly basis as additional records are received.
CNN | America's drug epidemic is the deadliest it has ever been, new federal data suggests.
More
than 100,000 people died of drug overdoses in the United States during
the 12-month period ending April 2021, according to provisional data
published Wednesday by the US Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention.
That's a new record high, with overdose deaths jumping 28.5% from the same period a year earlier and nearly doubling over the past five years.
Opioids
continue to be the driving cause of drug overdose deaths. Synthetic
opioids, primarily fentanyl, caused nearly two-thirds (64%) of all drug
overdose deaths in the 12-month period ending April 2021, up 49% from
the year before, the CDC's 's National Center for Health Statistics
found.
Drug overdose deaths rose nearly 30% in the past year, according to provisional data released by the National Center for Health Statistics. More than 100,000 people died from a drug overdose between April 2020 and April 2021, up from 78,000 the year before and nearly double the deaths five years ago.
The
Covid-19 pandemic and the rise in use of fentanyl have both been key
contributors to the rising overdose death toll, experts say.
The
latest provisional data on drug overdose deaths captures those
occurring in May 2020 through April 2021. Covid-19 killed about 509,000
people in that same timeframe, according to data from Johns Hopkins
University.
"What
we're seeing are the effects of these patterns of crisis and the
appearance of more dangerous drugs at much lower prices," Dr. Nora
Volkow, director of the National Institute on Drug Abuse, told CNN. "In a
crisis of this magnitude, those already taking drugs may take higher
amounts and those in recovery may relapse. It's a phenomenon we've seen
and perhaps could have predicted."
But
the rise of fentanyl, a stronger and faster-acting drug than natural
opiates, has made those effects even more deadly, she said.
Increasing
use of the synthetic drug caught the attention of experts before
Covid-19 hit, but the pandemic may have exacerbated the problem.
With
international travel limited, synthetics that are easier to manufacture
and more concentrated were likely more efficient to smuggle across
borders, Volkow said.
nashvillescene |On April 7, Tyler Smith graduated from a
10-week addiction treatment program in Athens, Tenn. His family traveled
from Knoxville for the occasion and felt optimistic that, this time,
his recovery might last. At 31 years old, he told his mother Danita
McCartney that he was ready to be done with the cycle that had shaped
his life for more than a decade.
Like
many teens, Tyler partied in high school, drinking beer and smoking
weed on occasion. But the beast got its claws in him toward the end of
his senior year, when a co-worker at a restaurant — a work environment
where drugs are often found about as easily as any other ingredient —
showed him how to crush an OxyContin and snort it. He spent the next 12
years in and out of the clutches of addiction. Danita would cling to
hope where she could find it. As a young boy, Tyler had always been
deathly afraid of needles — perhaps that would at least keep him from
shooting up. It didn’t.
But Danita says there were
wonderful seasons of sobriety. Tyler loved the Grateful Dead and the
mountains. Despite it being where he was introduced to hard drugs, the
restaurant industry had made him into an excellent cook, and he
delighted in taking over the kitchen at holidays to make a meal for the
whole family.
In between those seasons, Tyler
wandered, living for short stints in various places around the country.
When he struggled, he had the support of his family, and his mother says
he found great treatment through urban rescue missions similar to the
one where she works in Knoxville. He spent time in recovery programs in
Alabama, Indiana and Florida before moving to Nashville, where he
rekindled a relationship with a young woman he’d known in high school.
He found a job at a downtown restaurant — there, again, he found drugs.
In January of this year, he survived an overdose after his girlfriend
was able to revive him. That prompted his family to send him to the
program in Athens, where he stayed for more than two months.
After
he graduated from the program, Tyler returned to Nashville and got a
job at an irrigation company, deciding to stay away from the kitchens
where he’d been unable to resist substances. He talked on the phone with
his mother frequently, never failing to end a conversation by telling
her he loved her. But on the morning of Tuesday, April 14, Danita
received the phone call she’d been expecting for years but could never
prepare for. Tyler’s girlfriend had found him dead in the living room. A
toxicology report later revealed what was in his system: meth and
fentanyl, the latter a synthetic opioid that can be 50 to 100 times more potent than morphine and lethal in doses as small as 2 milligrams.
Tyler’s
death inducted his family into a growing, grieving community — those
who have lost loved ones to a raging epidemic of drug deaths, the
majority of which have been caused by fentanyl. It’s the other epidemic,
one that has been largely overshadowed by the global COVID-19 pandemic.
But in Nashville, it’s claimed almost as many lives. From March 20,
2020 — the day of the first confirmed COVID-19 death in Nashville — to
Oct. 16, 2021, the city reported 1,113 deaths from the virus. In that
same time period, 1,070 suspected drug deaths have occurred in
Nashville. That figure includes residents, non-residents and people
whose status is unknown. According to the Metro Public Health
Department, residents have accounted for around 70 percent of all drug
deaths in Davidson County this year.
The coronavirus pandemic has made us all terribly familiar with the
notion of the so-called curve. Fentanyl deaths are still rising, and
this curve is showing no signs of flattening.
The pathological elite of this country are in process of narratizing themselves through a controlled population decline. All institutions of public health seemingly accepting this top-down narrative.
Mckinsey was the major force
multiplier of the opioid crisis, and it is because of that fact that when I read this piece on the panicdemic, I'm drawn to conclude that the plan is simply to kill off people. Whether opioid addiction or viral contagion, the plan is simply to kill off unprofitable population.
After all, it was McKinsey who advised the Sacklers how to
make more money than god selling opioids legally. (coincidentally, this program coincided with the U.S. occupation of Afghanistan from whence tons of opium were exported back to the U.S.) The result
was deaths of addiction and despair all across the country, by
prescription.
McKinsey gives out the usual one size fits all advice to
everyone, streamline your business, make sales
triple, socialize your costs, demand tax exemptions… I can
even remember – less than 10 years ago – walking into same-day surgery
and seeing big stickers on the floor both advertising opiod pain killers
and advising to take them with caution. Laughable because when you are
in serious pain post surgery, you are inclined
to pop that stuff like candy. And then ask for more. I wonder if
McKinsey advised Pharma to install advertisements in hospitals.
westernjournal | New concerns are being raised about side effects from the Moderna vaccine against the coronavirus.
Swedish health officials have now decided that a moratorium on giving
the Moderna vaccine to anyone under 31 will be extended indefinitely,
the U.K. Daily Mail reported. The pause on the Moderna shots had been scheduled to end on Dec. 1.
Finland, Iceland and Denmark have taken similar steps. Norway is
encouraging men under 30 not to get the Moderna shot, but is not
mandating it.
For months, the Moderna vaccine has been under scrutiny because of data that shows young men who receive it are at increased risk for myocarditis, an inflammation of the heart muscle, and pericarditis, an inflammation of the sac around the heart.
The Daily Mail reported that one U.S. study that has not yet been
peer-reviewed concluded that “young males under [age] 20 are up to six
times more likely to develop myocarditis after contracting COVID-19 than
those who have been vaccinated.”
The decision comes as the U.S. Food and Drug Administration is
putting Moderna’s plans for a shot aimed at the population from age 12
to 17 on hold due to concerns over risks of the ailments, according to The Wall Street Journal.
Although a federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
panel on Thursday approved boosters for the Moderna and Johnson &
Johson vaccines, there were some cautions raised, according to CNBC.
Dr. Tom Shimabukuro said there is an increased risk of myocarditis
and pericarditis with either the Moderna or Pfizer vaccine, in
particular after the second dose of the vaccines.
According to the Daily Mail, the data indicated the risk was 13 times
greater for those getting the Moderna vaccine than for those who got
the Pfizer vaccine.
thesenecaeffect |Nevertheless, there could be creative possibilities for a "soft" elimination of large numbers of consenting people. One
way could be not letting them know that they are being killed.
Alternatively, they could be convinced to kill themselves in ways that
they don't recognize as "suicide." Both methods require deception, but
that's not a problem: deception is part and parcel of the very concept
of "Propaganda."
We all know the story of
people quietly walking into gassing chambers after having been told that
they were going to have a shower. It is an example of the strategy of
deception used in Nazi Germany to eliminate that fraction of the
population defined as "Lebensunwertes Leben," ''life unworthy of life.''
It included not only Jews and other ethnic minorities, but also "Aryan"
German citizens affected by malformations or just considered a burden
for the state.
In Germany, regular medical doctors used
barbiturates to kill children and gas chambers to get rid of adults.
Neither the victims nor their families were told of what was being
done. Officially, the victims were hospitalized to receive medical
treatment, and, later on, families received notice that, unfortunately,
their relatives had not survived the attempt to cure them. The number of
ethnic Germans killed in this way is estimated as around 300,000. Much smaller than that of the Jews and other ethnic groups exterminated, but still not negligible.
These
deaths were not suicides, but there was a certain element of voluntary
acceptance of the procedure and it is hard to think that people would
not at least suspect what was going on. The human mind is pliant, and probably everyone, including the victims, was doing their best to believe that it was all done for the sake of their health. Hence, they offered no resistance and even collaborated with their exterminators.
In our times, we have methods to get rid of people with their consent that were not available in Nazi Germany.
In terms of "substance abuse," we have a wide choice of substances that
shorten one's life expectancy and that are willingly ingested by
people. In some cases, they are forbidden, although obtainable illegally
(heroin, cocaine, and others). Some are marketed but advertised with
severe limitations (alcohol and tobacco). In other cases, they are
heavily advertised and widely available (junk food). We need also to
mention that some medical treatments are widely recommended as good for
your health, but nobody really knows if they really are (4) and in some
cases, it is discovered only later that they are very bad. Maybe you
remember the case of Thalidomide, but there are many more in the history of medicine. Surely, there will be more cases in the future.
Although effective, these substances are slow and messy ways to get rid of people and
they may generate negative side effects, for instance criminality and
handicapped people that are expensive to care for. For instance, cocaine
taken every day will shorten a person's life by
about 10 years, too slow to be interesting for would-be exterminators.
It is at least unlikely that the diffusion of heavy drugs in our society
is the result of an evil plan of extermination, although some agencies
of the deep state may well have a role in their supply and
distribution.
At this point, the question is
whether the stress on our society could accumulate to a level in which
we would start doing the things that were done in Germany during the
Nazi period, that is to exterminate people singled out for some physical
factor, religious belief, or ideology. And there is no doubt that our
society is heavily stressed although, probably not so heavily as Germany
was in 1945 (not yet, at least).
Of course, the reaction to this hypothesis normally comes with the sentence "It can't happen here" and
clearly, we are not seeing our governments distributing cyanide
capsules to the population. Nor we have evidence that doctors are
willingly killing their patients. But a basic rule in history is that if something happened once, it may happen again.
A Foundation of Joy
-
Two years and I've lost count of how many times my eye has been operated
on, either beating the fuck out of the tumor, or reattaching that slippery
eel ...
April Three
-
4/3
43
When 1 = A and 26 = Z
March = 43
What day?
4 to the power of 3 is 64
64th day is March 5
My birthday
March also has 5 letters.
4 x 3 = 12
...
Return of the Magi
-
Lately, the Holy Spirit is in the air. Emotional energy is swirling out of
the earth.I can feel it bubbling up, effervescing and evaporating around
us, s...
New Travels
-
Haven’t published on the Blog in quite a while. I at least part have been
immersed in the area of writing books. My focus is on Science Fiction an
Historic...
Covid-19 Preys Upon The Elderly And The Obese
-
sciencemag | This spring, after days of flulike symptoms and fever, a man
arrived at the emergency room at the University of Vermont Medical Center.
He ...
