WaPo | Elon
Musk acquired Twitter for $44 billion on Monday, the company announced,
giving the world’s richest person command of a highly influential
social media site that serves as a platform for political leaders, a
sounding board for experts across industries and an information hub for
millions of everyday users.
The
acquisition followed weeks of evangelizing on the necessity of “free
speech,” as the Tesla CEO seized on Twitter’s role as the “de facto town
square” and took umbrage with content moderation efforts he views as an
escalation toward censorship. He said he sees Twitter as essential to
the functioning of democracy and said the economics are not a concern.
Ownership
of Twitter gives Musk power over hugely consequential societal and
political issues, perhaps most significantly the ban on former president
Donald Trump that the site enacted in response to the Jan. 6 Capitol
riot.
Under
the terms of the deal, Twitter will become a private company and
shareholders will receive $54.20 per share, the company said in a news
release. The deal is expected to close this year.
“Free
speech is the bedrock of a functioning democracy, and Twitter is the
digital town square where matters vital to the future of humanity are
debated,” Musk said in the release. “I also want to make Twitter better
than ever by enhancing the product with new features, making the
algorithms open source to increase trust, defeating the spam bots, and
authenticating all humans.”
“Twitter
has tremendous potential — I look forward to working with the company
and the community of users to unlock it,” he added.
kremlin.ru | Taking part in our meeting are senior Government officials,
plenipotentiary presidential envoys in the federal districts and heads of Russian regions.
We
are meeting in a complicate period as our Armed Forces are conducting
a special military operation in Ukraine and Donbass. I would like
to remind you
that at the beginning, on the morning of February 24, I publicly
announced the reasons for and the main goal of Russia’s actions. It is
to help our people in Donbass, who have been subjected to real genocide
for nearly eight years in the most barbarous ways, that is, through
blockade, large-scale punitive
operations, terrorist attacks and constant artillery raids. Their only
guilt was
that they demanded basic human rights: to live according to their
forefathers’
laws and traditions, to speak their native language, and to bring up
their
children as they want.
During these years, the Kiev authorities
have ignored and sabotaged the implementation of the Minsk Package
of Measures for a peaceful settlement of the crisis and ultimately late
last year openly refused to implement it.
They also started to implement plans to join NATO. Moreover, the Kiev
authorities also announced their intention to have nuclear weapons and delivery
vehicles. This was a real threat. With foreign technical support, the pro-Nazi
Kiev regime would have obtained weapons of mass destruction in the foreseeable
future and, of course, would have targeted them against Russia.
There
was a network of dozens of laboratories in Ukraine, where military
biological programmes were conducted under the guidance and with
the financial
support of the Pentagon, including experiments with coronavirus strains,
anthrax, cholera, African swine fever and other deadly diseases. Frantic
attempts
are being made to conceal traces of these secret programmes. However, we
have
grounds to assume that components of biological weapons were being
created in direct proximity to Russia on the territory of Ukraine.
Our
numerous warnings that such developments posed a direct threat
to the security of Russia were rejected with open and cynical arrogance
by Ukraine
and its US and NATO patrons.
In other words, all our diplomatic efforts were fully in vain. We have
been left with no peaceful alternative to settle the problems that developed
through no fault of ours. In this situation, we were forced to begin this
special military operation.
The movement of Russian forces against
Kiev and other Ukrainian cities is
not connected with a desire to occupy that country. This is not our
goal, as I pointed out openly in my statement on February 24.
As for the combat tactics drafted by the Defence Ministry of Russia and the General Staff, this has fully justified itself.
Our fellows – soldiers and officers – are displaying courage and heroism and are
doing all they can to avoid civilian losses in Ukrainian cities.
This is what I would like to say for the first time: at the very start of the operation in Donbass, the Kiev authorities
were offered opportunities to avoid hostilities, via different channels, to simply
withdraw their troops from Donbass as an alternative to bloodshed. They did not
want to do this. Well, this was their decision; now they will understand what
is happening in reality, on the ground.
The operation is being carried out successfully,
in strict conformity with the approved plan.
I must note that,
encouraged by the United
States and other Western countries, Ukraine was purposefully preparing
for a scenario
of force, a massacre and an ethnic cleansing in Donbass. A massive
onslaught on Donbass and later Crimea was just a matter of time.
However, our Armed Forces have
shattered these plans.
Kiev was not just preparing for war,
for aggression against Russia – it was conducting it. There were endless attempts
to stage acts of subversion and organise a terrorist underground in Crimea.
Hostilities in Donbass and the shelling of peaceful residential areas have continued
all these years. Almost 14,000 civilians, including children have been killed
over this time.
As you know, there was a missile
strike at the centre of Donetsk on March 14. This was an overt bloody
act of terror
that took over 20 lives. Shelling has been ongoing during the past few
days.
They are striking randomly at squares with the fervor of fanatics
and the exasperation
of the doomed. They are acting like the Nazis did when they tried
to drag as many innocent victims as they could to their graves.
But what is shocking in its extreme cynicism
is not just Kiev’s blatant lies and statements that Russia allegedly launched this
missile at Donetsk (they have gone as far as this), but the attitude of the so-called
civilised world. The European and American press did not even notice this tragedy
in Donetsk, as if nothing happened.
This is how they have been
hypocritically looking the other way over the past eight years as mothers
buried their children in Donbass, as elderly people were killed. This is simply
moral degradation, complete de-humanisation.
It was no longer
possible to tolerate
this outrageous attitude towards the people of Donbass. To put an end
to this genocide,
Russia recognized the people’s republics of Donbass and signed treaties
of friendship and mutual aid with them. Based on these treaties,
the republics
appealed to Russia for military aid in rebuffing the aggression. We
rendered this
aid because we simply could not do otherwise. We had no right to act
otherwise.
I would like to emphasise this point
and draw your attention to it: if our troops had acted only within
the people's
republics and helped them liberate their territory, it would not have
been a final
solution, it would not have led to peace and would not have ultimately
removed the threat – to our country, this time to Russia.
On the contrary, a new frontline
would have been extended around Donbass and its borders, and shelling
and provocations would have continued. In other words, this armed
conflict would
have continued indefinitely. It would have been fuelled
by the revanchist
hysteria of the Kiev regime, as NATO deployed its military
infrastructure faster
and more aggressively. In this case, we would have been faced with
the fact
that the attack, the offensive weapons of the alliance were already
at our
borders.
I will repeat – we had no alternative
for self-defence, for ensuring Russia's security, to this special military
operation. We will reach the goals we set. We will certainly ensure the security
of Russia and our people and will never allow Ukraine to be a bridgehead for aggressive
actions against our country.
We remain ready to discuss matters
of fundamental importance to Russia’s future during the talks. This includes Ukraine’s
status as a neutral country, and demilitarisation and denazification. Our
country has done everything it could to organise and hold these talks realising
that it is important to use every opportunity to save people and their lives.
But
time and time again we see that
the Kiev regime, which its Western handlers have charged with the task
of creating
an aggressive “anti-Russia” stance, does not care about the future
of the people of Ukraine. They do not care that people are dying, that
hundreds of thousands, or even millions of people had to flee their
homes, and that a horrendous
humanitarian disaster is unfolding in the cities controlled
by the neo-Nazis
and armed criminals who were cut loose.
Clearly, Kiev’s Western patrons are just
pushing them to continue the bloodshed. They incessantly supply Kiev with
weapons and intelligence, as well as other types of assistance, including
military advisers and mercenaries.
They are using economic,
financial,
trade and other sanctions against Russia as weapons, but these sanctions
have
backfired in Europe and in the United States where prices of gasoline,
energy and food have shot up, and jobs in the industries associated with
the Russian
market have been cut. So, do not shift the blame on us and do not accuse
our
country of everything that goes wrong in your countries.
I want
ordinary Western people hear
me, too. You are being persistently told that your current difficulties
are the result of Russia’s hostile actions and that you have to pay
for the efforts to counter
the alleged Russian threat from your own pockets. All of that is a lie.
The truth
is that the problems faced
by millions of people in the West are the result of many years
of actions by the ruling elite of your respective countries, their
mistakes, and short-sighted
policies and ambitions. This elite is not thinking about how to improve
the lives
of their citizens in Western countries. They are obsessed with their own
self-serving
interests and super profits.
This can be seen in the data provided
by international organisations, which clearly show that social problems, even
in the leading Western countries, have exacerbated in recent years, that
inequality and the gap between the rich and the poor is widening, and racial
and ethnic conflicts are making themselves felt. The myth of the Western
welfare society, the so-called golden billion, is crumbling.
To reiterate, the whole planet is
now paying for the West’s ambitions and the West’s attempts to maintain its elusive
dominance by any means possible.
gilbertdoctorow | “The entire course of developments and analysis of the incoming
information show that a clash between Russia and these forces is
inevitable. It is only a question of time: they are getting ready, they
are waiting for a suitable moment. Now they are also claiming the right
to own nuclear weapons. We will not allow them to do this.
“As I said before, after the collapse of the USSR Russia accepted the
new geopolitical realities. We have behaved respectfully and will
continue to be respectful to all the newly formed countries in
post-Soviet space. We respect and will respect their sovereignty and an
example for that is the help we extended to Kazakhstan, which
experienced tragic events that challenged its statehood and integrity.
But Russia cannot feel secure, develop, exist under a constant threat
coming from the territory of contemporary Ukraine….
“They left us with no other possibility than to defend /Russia, our
people than what we are compelled to do today. The circumstances demand
of us decisive and immediate actions. The Peoples Republics of the
Donbas turned to Russia asking for help. In this connection…I have taken
the decision to carry out a special military operation.
“Its objective is to defend people who in the course of eight years
have been subjected to mockery, to genocide from the Kiev regime. And
for this purpose we will strive to demilitarize and de-Nazify Ukraine,
as well as to turn over to courts those who committed numerous bloody
crimes against civilians, including citizens of the Russian Federation.
“All the while we have no plans for an occupation of Ukrainian
territories. We do not intend to impose anything on anyone by force. ..
“At the basis of our policy is freedom, freedom of choice for
everyone to independently determine their future and the future of their
children. And we consider it to be important that this right, the right
of free choice, may be exercised by all peoples living on the
territory of present-day Ukraine, by all who so wish.”
As regards the Ukrainian armed forces, Putin issued the following appeal:
“Respected comrades. Your fathers, grandfathers, great grandfathers
did not fight against the Nazis and defend our common Motherland just to
see today’s neo-Nazis seize power in Ukraine. You took an oath of
loyalty to the Ukrainian people and not to a junta against the people
which is robbing Ukraine and has only contempt for the people.
“Do not carry out criminal orders. I call upon you to immediately lay
down your arms and to go home. Let me explain: all servicemen in the
Ukrainian army who carry out this demand can freely leave the area of
combat and go back to their families.”
As regards third party countries:
“Now several very important words for those who may be tempted to
intervene in the events presently occurring. Whoever tries to hinder us,
or still worse to create threats to our country, to our people, must
know that Russia’s response will be immediate and will lead you to such
consequences as you never experienced in your history. We are ready for
any development of events. All necessary decisions in this regard have
already been taken. I hope that I will be heard.”
WaPo | Vance has taken a ton of heat recently for claiming,
“I don’t really care what happens to Ukraine one way or the other.” In
that appearance, Vance added that “Mexican fentanyl” is a much bigger
problem, describing the southern border as a “total war zone.”
What's happening in Ukraine has nothing to do with our national security, but it is distracting our idiot "leaders" from focusing on the things that actually do matter to our national security, like securing the border & stopping the flow of Fentanyl that's killing American kids. https://t.co/a6bAaRxSH7
Buried underneath this smarmy formulation is a real argument, and it’s a repulsive one. There’s a reason Vance and others
keep linking our border to that of Ukraine: Drawing this connection
treats immigration to the United States as a species of invasion on a
par with what Russia is threatening.
Russia has just declared that two separatist regions in Ukraine are independent and sent in troops to them, a move that the United Nations has condemned as a violation of international law and Ukrainian sovereignty.
Yet
Vance’s ugly suggestion is that immigration to the United States and
this Russian invasion are somehow vaguely comparable threats to national
sovereignty, and that only the former one should occupy our attention.
Of
course, what Vance really objects to is that Biden has undone a few of
Trump’s immigration policies. We’re now letting in migrant kids whereas
Trump tried to keep them out, and Biden is trying to end Trump’s “Remain
in Mexico” policy.
That
has created serious logistical challenges with no easy answers, to be
sure. But it’s hardly a severe blow to our national sovereignty, and at
any rate, it’s better than Trump’s alternative, which produced a humanitarian catastrophe. Vance views that catastrophe as successful policy.
But
the deeper point of Vance’s formulation connecting the U.S. and
Ukrainian borders is this: In that version of populist nationalism, the
United States should dramatically retreat on any and all international
obligations, both in maintaining the liberal international order and in letting in legal immigrants, asylum seekers and refugees.
These are two sides of the same coin. David Rothkopf, a foreign policy expert, author and commentator, notes that both represent similar retreats on the very idea of having an international order at all.
“A
central tenet of Trumpism was to seek the end of the international
order,” Rothkopf told me. “But this isn’t just Trumpism. It’s also
Putinism.”
NYTimes | What messaging discipline exists comes
from the early public face of the effort, Ms. Lich, said Jay Hill, the
interim leader of the Maverick Party, a small right-of-center group
based out of Calgary, Alberta, created to promote the separation of
Canada’s three western Prairie Provinces from the rest of the country. Ms. Lich has deep ties to the group.
Even
before the convoy assembled, its messaging was Ms. Lich’s
preoccupation, according to Mr. Hill, who said she called him several
times even before arriving in Ottawa to strategize.
“We
had a number of discussions about staying on message, about the need in
this modern-day world of politics to have a very clearly defined
message that is understandable and simple, a message that people can
grasp hold of and run with,” he said. “Tamara clearly understands that.”
Ms.
Lich played a leading role in organizing a GoFundMe campaign for the
protests that raised $7.8 million before the crowdfunding site shut it
down after receiving “police reports of violence and other unlawful
activity,” GoFundMe said.
Previously,
Ms. Lich worked as a personal trainer in Medicine Hat, Alberta, a town
once dubbed “Hell’s Basement,” by Rudyard Kipling for its location on
top of huge natural gas field.
Zach
Smithson, an employee at Body Building Depot Fitness Emporium, where Ms.
Lich used to work, said she has since become the talk of the town.
“I think we are all very proud of her,” he said.
Ms. Lich did not respond to a call and text message requesting an interview.
B.J.
Dichter, an official spokesman for the convoy, said he joined the
effort after Ms. Lich sought help managing the swell of donations
flowing into a GoFundMe page. Mr. Dichter has a history of spoutinganti-Islamist
views and once said that “political Islam” is “rotting away at our
society like syphilis.” He has rejected claims of racism.
“I’m Jewish,” he told the journalist Rupa Subramanya. “I have family in mass graves in Europe. And apparently I’m a white supremacist.”
Within
the occupiers’ tightly managed ground operations, there are military
hallmarks, outlined and executed by the several higher-ups who have
backgrounds in the armed forces and law enforcement, according to Mr.
Marazzo. He said he spent 25 years in the military, and with his
measured tones he is frequently deployed as the spokesman for the group.
“This
was a grass-roots convoy that just left their homes and headed for
Ottawa,” said Mr. Marazzo, a former instructor at Georgian College in
Ontario who added that he was fired because of his anti-vaccine beliefs.
“They’ve deployed to the field without really knowing who our
commanding officers were, who were the platoon commander, and who were
the captains — That was a team effort.”
politico | Organizers
have dubbed their movement "the People's Convoy" and say they are
working with two groups — Freedom Fighter Nation and Restore Liberty —
whose founders are closely tied to right wing politics, based on
POLITICO's review of social media and online records.
That
includes Leigh Dundas, a California lawyer and founder of the Freedom
Fighter Nation, who gave a speech on the eve of the Jan. 6 Capitol Hill
riots calling for Trump supporters to kill those whom she claimed had
aided foreign governments in undermining the 2020 presidential election,
based on a video posted on Twitter.
"A
lot of this has worrying parallels to the build-up to the Jan. 6
riots," said Ciaran O'Connor, an analyst for the Institute for Strategic
Dialogue, a think tank that tracks online extremism and which has been
following the global protests. "It's concerning how this may play out if
they get to D.C."
The
goal of the U.S. convoy is to push back at vaccine and mask mandates —
messages that have been repeated widely by right wing politicians and
supporters since the beginning of the coronavirus pandemic in early
2020.
In
communication channels on Telegram, an encrypted messaging service,
anonymous social media users have railed to tens of thousands of channel
members against the alleged Covid-19 oversteps of President Joe Biden's
administration and shared videos and other posts from the Canadian
truckers' convoy to boost support for similar action in the U.S.
It
is unclear if, or when, the U.S. convoy will reach Washington, though
within these encrypted messaging channels, supporters routinely offer
food, supplies and other logistical support, based on POLITICO's review
of the online discussions.
After GoFundMe, the crowdfunding
site, removed the fundraising page for the Canadian convoy, far-right
influencers like Jack Posobiec shared links via their large social media
followings to alternative funding sites. A similar page on GiveSendGo —
a rival crowdfunding site frequented by the far right — has so far
raised $7.2 million out of a goal of $16 million.
The California-to-Washington protest
is not the only anti-mandate convoy that has sprung up to mirror the
ongoing mobilization in Canada.
On Feb. 14, similar protests from
across the European Union are expected to descend on Brussels — home to
the bloc's main political institutions — to rally against mask and
vaccine mandates as the region continues to struggle to cope with the
Covid-19 pandemic.
bignewsnetwork | Owned and operated primarily by Black formerly incarcerated women,
ChiFresh prepared healthy, culturally relevant meals with food that is
grown or raised at nearby farms. They are 100 percent employee-owned and
operated, and all employees are eligible for ownership stake after 18
months on the job, after which they can start paying toward a $2,000
membership share.
Of their first day of operation in May 2020,
they made jerk chicken strips and red beans and rice, with onions and
peppers, as a practice run for friends and family, and as founding
member-owner Edrinna Bryant told NextCity.org that week:
"'We
were so excited about the fact we were going to cook our first meal
together and people can taste it,' Bryant says. 'That's so exciting to
me as a young Black mom who was incarcerated. For my child to know that
his mom was in a situation that felt like the end of the world and look
at her now Ain't no food going to go wasted here. Each day each of us
will pick somewhere on the South Side or West Side and bring some food
to people who need it.'"
In addition to providing
an alternative food contracting option to local facilities by
introducing a locally sourced and prepared food option, they are also
providing jobs, agency and ownership stakes to one of the most commonly
marginalized groups in the country.
ChiFresh Kitchen is part of a
growing BIPOC-led movement, via urban farms, food operators, worker
centers, policy advocates and other community organizations in Chicago
focused on food sovereignty, racial justice and equitable food access.
While
the business planning for ChiFresh began in 2018, the business became
operational just prior to the pandemic. They'd initially planned to
launch in the summer of 2020, but launched earlier than planned in March
2020 via a contract with the Urban Growers Collective,
which had received funding to address pandemic-related food insecurity
in their communities. Less than a year into operations they were
prepping 500 meals per day.
The
demand for what ChiFresh offers has only grown since, and in December
of 2020, they bought a 6,000 square-foot building (their current space
is about 600 square feet), which they are working to renovate, funded
through a series of grants. They plan to move into the new space in the
spring of 2022, and expand their capacity so that they are able to
prepare 5,000 or more meals per day.
ChiFresh Kitchen founder
Camille Kerr-a workplace democracy/worker ownership/solidarity economy
consultant-says the project began when a small group of people, herself
included, were looking into the ability of worker cooperatives to create
a "liberatory, dignified workplace for formerly incarcerated people,
and specifically Black women."
April M. Short of the Independent
Media Institute spoke with Kerr about ChiFresh Kitchen and future
potentials of local, worker-owned food sovereignty projects like this
one to bring the food industry up to date with the real, current food
needs of communities across the U.S. and beyond.
france24 | An occupation of Canada's capital by
truckers opposed to vaccine mandates gained steam as it entered its
second week on Saturday, with more demonstrators piling onto the clogged
streets of Ottawa, while protests kicked off in several other cities.
In the capital, protesters huddled around campfires in
bone-chilling temperatures and erected bouncy castles for kids outside
Parliament, while waving Canadian flags and shouting anti-government
slogans.
The atmosphere appeared more festive than a week earlier,
when several protesters waved Confederate flags and Nazi symbols and
clashed with locals.
Police, who were out in force and put up
barriers overnight to limit vehicle access to the city center, said they
were bracing for up to 2,000 protesters -- as well as 1,000
counterprotesters -- to join hundreds of truckers already jamming Ottawa
streets.
But organizers of the so-called Freedom Convoy told AFP they expected their numbers to swell into the tens of thousands.
Similar
protests were happening in Toronto, Quebec City and Winnipeg. And in
southern Alberta province, truckers blocked a major border crossing to
the US state of Montana.
"This remains an increasingly volatile
and increasingly dangerous demonstration," Ottawa police chief Peter
Sloly told a news conference Friday.
With public anger rising --
thousands of residents have complained of harassment by protesters, and
an online petition demanding action has drawn 40,000 signatures -- Sloly
vowed to crack down on what he called an "unlawful" occupation of the
city.
The over 17,000 signers of the declaration will be represented on Sunday, January 23, when Dr. Malone stands with fellow doctors and scientists on stage in Washington DC, as part of the Defeat the Mandates march Sunday, January 23, 2022. At the Lincoln Memorial, they will be joined by a wide range of featured guests for a series of inspiring talks and musical performances. Join us!
About the Global COVID Summit
Global Covid Summit is the product of an international alliance of doctors and scientists, committed to speaking truth to power about Covid pandemic research and treatment.
Thousands have died from Covid as a result of being denied life-saving early treatment. The Declaration is a battle cry from physicians who are daily fighting for the right to treat their patients, and the right of patients to receive those treatments - without fear of interference, retribution or censorship by government, pharmacies, pharmaceutical corporations, and big tech. We demand that these groups step aside and honor the sanctity and integrity of the patient- physician relationship, the fundamental maxim "First Do No Harm", and the freedom of patients and physicians to make informed medical decisions. Lives depend on it. More information here: https://globalCovidSummit.org
quora | I thought I was a man of the world when I joined the police. I was 31,
served ten years in the army, a couple of years on the news desks and a few more in drama production all over the world. A few weeks into my first beat I realised most of my assumptions of police work were Hollywood. I had a better idea of the ground situation in the Balkans than I did my own city.
This was my first beat in 2002. To the south were celeb and banker heavy clubs, bohemians and bright young things flaunting their success in the drinking squares. The remnants of the Curtain Theatre where Shakespeare learnt his trade sits squarely in the middle. It was a veneer factory when I attended it after a burglary and got to stand on the last 3ft of original stage.
When I first walked it the Prime Minister’s home address was just off the top left corner of this map in Islington. The Verve’s Bittersweet Symphony video was still popular and was filmed on Hoxton Street along the eastern boundary.
The Provost estate sits in the top right corner of the beat. I entered my first crack den there: Two toms (prostitutes), a street artist (beggar) and a small business owner (distribution of car tyres) all cooking up while a half mummified dog was still chained to the radiator in the back room. The floor had been used as a toilet and newspaper put down to cover the mess, a four inch duvet of human waste.
You could see the back yard of the Police Station from the window.
At the end of my first year I had to turn in a file on my beat - an intelligence and ground picture of: prom nom sightings (prominent nominals - the bigger players in crime); PYOs (persistent young offenders - much the same but under 18); gang nominals; street dealers; drug prices; robbery hotspots; burglary trends; vehicle crime methods; drug dens and stairwells. The names of homeless and street drinkers; bouncers; shop keepers; prostitutes the lot.
It was a record of what you had been up to and what you’d taken notice of.
One important aspect was to build a map of your ground: active crack houses / drug dens were a big part of this picture, my bosses loved closing them down and getting pictures in the papers. Wherever they sprung up anti-social behaviour, criminal damage, robbery, theft from vehicles, snatches and begging would spread out like ink blots on a map.
So drugs are bad - whole estates reduced to stinking derelicts as the locust-zombies meander your patch devouring goodwill and community relations. So we closed them down on a regular basis. We’d push them onto the next beat and three months later they got pushed back to us and you started collecting the evidence again.
The most common venues for drugs dens were the homes of vulnerable adults. Long ago it was decided that people with severe learning disabilities or chronic mental health issues would get more from life if they got their care in the community. The officials running this policy swiftly became inundated and the locusts descended in lieu.
Nice little cash cows are folk on disability benefit. You can trash their house and the council will get them a new one. You can get a free car lease and insurance thru motability finance if you just claim to be the carer of the vulnerable disabled person you’re using as a cash cow and shell company for the low-level fraud you fund your habit with.
In my annual report I had found evidence of maybe thirty drug addled locusts in four squats. I may have missed some but they are not covert. Let’s say those addicts are using twice a day (the upper scale of use) thats 30 x £40 a day = £1,200 a day - £438,000 a year to be made supplying crack and heroin to the locusts in this small square of London.
spectatorworld | The mainstream media has spent months dancing on the graves
of political personalities and normal people alike who refused a
COVID-19 vaccine and then succumbed to the virus itself. They’ve created
a totem of who these unwashed masses of zombie-horde anti-vaxxers are:
MAGA hat-wearing, Boomer hicks more interested in their ‘free-dumb’ than
their health.
But as basketball season approaches, that caricature is about to
vanish. According to NBC Sports, about 90 percent of all NBA players are
vaccinated. But a small number of players are speaking out against
vaccine mandates, offering nuanced opinions on the vaccine as it
pertains to natural antibodies in those who have contracted COVID
already.
It’s a conversation the Biden administration isn’t interested in
having with the public. Neither is the NBA, which is seeking to impose a
penalty on any player who refuses the COVID vaccine. But that has not
stopped a vocal minority of players from challenging the press on the
history of African Americans, vaccinations and born immunity.
Andrew Wiggins of the Golden State Warriors is one holdout. Brooklyn
Nets star Kyrie Irving is another. But it was the Orlando Magic’s
Jonathan Isaac that most mystified the sports media. They seem confused
that NBA players are speaking out at all, let alone, as we are starting
to see in New York City, Black Lives Matter protesters, who are taking
up the mantle of opposition to vaccine mandates.
Isaac’s stance
is not that of the ranting, raving Facebook loon. ‘I would say I’m
hesitant at this time but at the end of the day I don’t feel that it is
anyone’s reason to come out and say “well this is why” or “this is not
why”, it should just be their decision,’ he said at a press conference
earlier this week. ‘Loving your neighbor is not just loving those who
agree with you or look like you or move in the same way that you do.
It’s loving those who don’t.’
The rest of his comments are worth quoting at length:
‘I understand that the vaccine would
help if you have COVID, you’ll be able to have less symptoms from
contracting it. But with me having COVID in the past and having
antibodies, with my current age group and physical fitness level, it’s
not necessarily a fear of mine. Taking the vaccine, like I said, it
would decrease my chances of having a severe reaction, but it does open
me up to the albeit rare chance but the possibility of me having an
adverse reaction to the vaccine itself. I don’t believe that being
unvaccinated means infected or being vaccinated means uninfected. You
can still catch COVID with or with not having the vaccine. I would say
honestly the craziness of it all in terms of not being able to say that
it should be everybody’s fair choice without being demeaned or talked
crazy to doesn’t make one comfortable to do what said person is telling
them to do.’
I don’t personally agree with his vaccine stance. I myself contracted
COVID last year and still chose to get vaccinated. However there is a
deeper meaning to what he’s saying that goes beyond ‘Bill Gates is
trying to microchip everyone.’ It stands against what the media and the
Biden administration are attempting to do by shaming and other-ing
anyone who opts not to get vaccinated or can’t because of medical
reasons. And that’s before we even get into the dark history African
Americans and vaccinations, which has no doubt played a role in lower
vaccination rates among that demographic.
Isaac is rejecting the atmosphere of division, the idea that anyone
who’s unvaccinated is deserving of scorn from the desks at CNN, as well
as ostracization from polite society by employers, friends and family.
Division is the lingua franca of the national media — and Isaac
isn’t speaking it. Legitimate medical diagnoses are being lumped in with
QAnon Facebook conspiracists. That leads nowhere good.
Jonathan Isaac seems to understand this. It’s worth asking why our media and political leaders choose to ignore it.
greenwald |It is virtually a religious belief
in the dominant liberal culture that people who do not want the COVID
vaccine are stupid, ignorant, immoral and dangerous. As large sectors of
the population continue to question or disobey their COVID decrees,
they have begun to make more explicit this condescending view.
Liberals
feel free to disparage them as "stupid” notwithstanding long-standing
(though diminishing) racial disparities among this group. A CNN headline
from last month told part of the story: “Black New Yorkers may have
the lowest vaccination rates, but community groups refuse to give up.”
Citing data from the city's health agency, the network reported that
“citywide, just 28% of Black New Yorkers between the ages of 18 and 44
are fully vaccinated. The Hispanic community is the second-least fully
vaccinated population in that age group, with 49% being fully
vaccinated.”
Two weeks ago, Bloomberg reported that while some of the unvaccinated are unable to get the vaccine (due to work pressures
or health conditions), most of them are vaccine-hesitant by choice and
continue to reflect racial disparities. Under the headline “U.S. Racial
Vaccine Gaps Are Bigger Than We Thought: Covid-19 Tracker,” the news
outlet reported: “the White vaccination rate is not as bad as it had
seemed and Hispanic communities are lagging more than previously
thought.”
Yet
liberal elites continue to call anyone who is unvaccinated "stupid,”
ignorant and immoral. On Sunday, New York's Democratic Governor Kathy
Hochul, when announcing
her intent to use National Guard soldiers to replace health care
workers fired for refusing the vaccine, told her audience: “yes, I know
you're vaccinated, you're the smart ones.” She then said those who
refuse to get the vaccine are not just stupid but have turned their back
on God: “there's people out there who aren't listening to God and what
God wants.” Gov. Hochul added that the vaccine “is from God to us and we
must say, thank you, God,” and said to her "smart” vaccinated
supporters: “I need you to be my apostles.”
On September 16, CNN host Don Lemon maligned those
who have chosen not to be vaccinated as "stupid,” "selfish,” filled
with “ignorance,” and “not acting on logic, reason and science." He then
issued this decree: “it’s time to start shaming them or leave them
behind.” When controversy erupted over the lavish indoor gala former
President Obama threw for himself, at which his guests were unmasked
while the servants were masked, New York Times reporter Annie Karni explained on CNN
that while some of Obama's neighbors on Martha's Vineyard objected,
many believed that a maskless party was fine because “this is a
sophisticated, vaccinated crowd." Late-night host Jimmy Kimmel suggested the unvaccinated should be deprioritized for health care in hospitals, while Howard Stern recently lambasted the unvaccinated as “imbeciles” and “nut jobs” and argued they should be denied health care and be left to die.
That
the unvaccinated are inherently primitive and stupid troglodytes was
always a claim as baseless and offensive as it is counter-productive.
Although I personally took the vaccine the first day it was available to
me — as I repeatedly said I would in every forum where I speak,
including Fox News — it was always clear that there were cogent reasons
while those with different circumstances and risk factors (age, health,
prior COVID status) might assess their own risks differently and reach a
different conclusion. And what made me most comfortable about my choice
to get vaccinated, or to decide whether my kids should, was precisely
that it was my choice, after informing myself: the idea of forcing
someone to do it against their will, or condition people's rights and
privileges on vaccine compliance — as both President Biden and the ACLU astonishingly advocated — always struck me as inconceivable.
The
attempt to equate being unvaccinated with stupidity and ignorance
suffered a massive blow on Wednesday night when NBA star Jonathan Isaac
was asked why he was hesitant to take the vaccine. Like many unions, the
NBA's player union has refused a vaccine mandate, and Isaac, the
23-year-old player with the Orlando Magic who previously had and
recovered from COVID, gave a stunningly compelling, informed,
well-reasoned and thoughtful exposition on his rationale for not wanting
the vaccine. Isaac also defended the right of individuals to make their
own choice. One need not agree with his ultimate conclusion on the
vaccine to see how groundless (and obnoxious) it is to claim that anyone
who chooses not to take the vaccine — like him — is stupid, ignorant
and primitive. I really encourage everyone to watch his two-minute
master class in demonstrating why such a choice can, depending on one's
circumstances, be perfectly rational:
Is
there anyone who can argue with a straight face that Isaac sounds
stupid, ignorant or evil? One can cogently dispute the wisdom of his
conclusion: while it is true that most people who recover from COVID (as
he did) enjoy "natural immunity” in the form of antibodies — indeed,
one major study found
that “the natural immune protection that develops after a SARS-CoV-2
infection offers considerably more of a shield against the Delta variant
of the pandemic coronavirus than two doses of the Pfizer-BioNTech
vaccine — some studies conclude that immunity is stronger still with the vaccine.”
Nonetheless,
Issac is indisputably right that the risk of dying or becoming
seriously ill of COVID is extremely low for someone like him: early 20s,
healthy and with natural immunity. In fact, during the entire course of the pandemic, the total number
of people aged 15-24 (Isaac's age group) who have died of COVID — in a
country of 330 million people — is 1,372: fewer than the number in that
age group who have died of non-COVID pneumonia. Add onto that Isaac's
physical fitness and the fact that he already had COVID once, his risk
from contracting the virus is vanishingly small.
It
is true that the long-term effects of COVID are unknown, but that is
also true of the long-term risks from these new vaccines. Isaac is also
right ….
rollingstone | Monday, September 27th: Irving was not present for Nets Media Day
at Barclays Center in Brooklyn, where city law requires athletes to
have at least one dose of Covid vaccination to participate in team
activities.
Appearing from his home for a brief press conference with reporters,
Irving declined to answer directly four separate questions regarding his
vaccination and playing status. “Living in this public sphere, there’s a
lot of questions about what’s going on in the world of Kyrie,” he said,
“and I would love to just keep that private and handle that the right
way with my team and go forward with a plan.”
The Nets dodged questions about what such a plan might be. San
Francisco city officials removed religious and medical exemptions from
their policy on Friday, making the NBA’s
decision on Wiggins easier. A league source said any comment on further
applications for exemptions in New York would make too clear who had
applied; the New York Knicks have said their team is 100-percent
vaccinated.
One by one, the basketball players — non-vaccinated star here,
fully-inoculated veteran on mute down there, a full-on anti-vaxxer
front-and-center — logged into the video conference. The annual summer
meeting of the powerful NBA union had gone virtual again on August 7,
and high on the agenda for the season ahead was a proposed mandate from
the league office that 100 percent of players get vaccinated against Covid-19.
One response echoed from squares across the screen, according to players and an executive on the call: Non-starter. Non-starter.”
The NBA had relied on science above all to lead the sports world
through the Covid nightmare, from the league’s outbreak-driven shutdown
to a pandemic-proof playoff bubble in Disney World to game after game
with fans back in the stands. But after two plagued seasons of non-stop
nasal swabbing, quarantining and distrust, unvaccinated players were
pushing back. They made their case to the union summit: There should be
testing this year, of course, just not during off-days. They’d mask up
on the court and on the road, if they must. But no way would they agree
to a mandatory jab. The vaccine deniers had set the agenda; the players
agreed to take their demands for personal freedom to the NBA’s
negotiating table.
This month, league officials caught a break: Two of America’s most
progressive cities, New York and San Francisco, would require pro
athletes to show proof of one Covid-19 vaccination dose to play indoors,
except with an approved medical or religious exemption. Which meant
that one of the NBA’s biggest stars — one known for being receptive to
conspiratorial beliefs — would be under heavy pressure to get a shot.
And if Brooklyn Nets superstar Kyrie Irving could be convinced to take
the vaccine, then maybe, just maybe, the whole league could create a new
kind of bubble together.
When asked directly about Irving’s vaccination status — or his plans
to change it — multiple people familiar with his thinking declined to
answer directly. But one confidant and family member floated to Rolling Stone
the idea of anti-vaxx players skipping home games to dodge the New York
City ordinance… or at least threatening to protest them, until the NBA
changes its ways.
“There are so many other players outside of him who are opting out, I
would like to think they would make a way,” says Kyrie’s aunt, Tyki
Irving, who runs the seven-time All-Star’s family foundation and is one
of the few people in his regular circle of advisors. “It could be like
every third game. So it still gives you a full season of being
interactive and being on the court, but with the limitations that
they’re, of course, oppressing upon you. There can be some sort of
formula where the NBA and the players can come to some sort of
agreement.”
gofundme | I make videos because we're losing our voice, and our hope and I can’t
allow that. My Mother, whose 9-year death anniversary (September 2021),
taught me to Speak Up and don’t allow others to shame you when you’re
standing for what is right. My grandmother taught her the same.
It’s
simply in my blood to STAND and never bow or break for immorality and
injustice. My fans have supported me on all my media platforms and now
it's time to take it a step further.
I got your back and I ain’t shuting up!
Don’t
tell me I don’t understand. In 2012 my Mother was murdered while
speaking to me on the phone. ZERO RESULTS! After I was on multiple news
channels, radio stations, the newspaper and I personally put up
thousands of flyers within a 15 mile radius, sent letters to Obama and
Kamala Harris, still NO ANSWER!
So listen, I understand Pain and
misrepresentation. I do know what it feels like to be ignored, and your
rights rejected by these people who think you’re too stupid to
articulate your issues. They didn’t see me coming... and now TikTok has
cancelled me.
I don't want to just be the person who Cyber Fights... I'd like to be the voice of reason across this great country.
Though
I've been shut down on TikTok, the mission continues. These funds will
be used to gather my team of consultants, accountants and a video
production company to help with my upcoming marketing campaign (for my
book) and TV show coming later on this year! (funds will be withdrawn
into the McGloverable LLC).
katv | OSHA has been working quietly behind the scenes on an emergency
temporary standard that can stand up to legal challenges. Their
strongest position will be establishing the need for a mandate to
protect employees against the "grave danger" of COVID-19.
"OSHA
is very aware this is something that's being looked at with tremendous
scrutiny," said Helen Rella, an employment attorney with Wilk Auslander.
The more clearly the agency is able to articulate the dangers of COVID
and provide detailed steps to mitigate it, the stronger its position
against constitutional challenges.
"They are going to anticipate
... challenges and they want to head that off at the pass," Rella said,
predicting the final emergency temporary standard will be very detailed.
Already, 24 Republican-led states have announced plans to sue the
Biden administration over the vaccine and testing mandate. The
Republican attorneys general expressed skepticism
that OSHA could "meet the high burden" of proving most employees are in
"grave danger." They argued that younger workers have a lower risk of
hospitalization and death from COVID-19. Over 77% of COVID deaths have been in people 65 or older.
Last
week, the Job Creators Network, a conservative small business advocacy
group, also announced plans to file a lawsuit to block the
implementation of the OSHA guidance when it's released.
"It's one
thing if a private company of any size wants to require employees to be
vaccinated. It's a whole different ballgame when the federal government
is compelling these businesses to police their employees," said Elaine
Parker, president of the Job Creators Network Foundation. The group is
filing suit with some of its small business members and their employees.
The
Job Creators Network along with other business groups have also sounded
the alarm over the risk that some employees would quit rather than be
forced to get a shot or weekly COVID test.
"The biggest issue these people are facing is the labor shortage," Parker said.
In a letter to
the White House Safer Workforce Taskforce, the Association of General
Contractors, which represents over 27,000 construction firms, warned
that the vaccine mandate could "exacerbate the industry's labor
shortage" while increasing the cost and completion times for federal
projects, including infrastructure.
The group was specifically
concerned about the vaccine mandate for federal contractors, which will
take effect in a matter of days under an executive order.
The industry is already experiencing high levels of vaccine skepticism
and a worker shortage, the trade group noted. Firms fear many of their
workers would quit for a job with another contractor that doesn't have a
mandate rather than get the shot.
The OSHA rule is expected to affect roughly 170,000 businesses that
have 100 or fewer employees, or less than 1% of all businesses,
according to government data.
Additionally, many of the country's largest employers have already
enacted vaccine requirements for some or all of their workers.
Employers that mandated shots have reported high rates of uptake. Tyson Foods, which employs 120,000 workers, saw its vaccination rate increase from 45% to over 72% after issuing a mandate in August. United Airlines reported Wednesday that 97% of its 67,000-person workforce was vaccinated. United CEO Scott Kirby told CNN last week that only "a handful" of employees quit rather than getting the shot.
The
courts have had a strong record of upholding vaccine mandates by
private entities during the pandemic. Recent rulings favored shot
requirements by Houston Methodist Hospital and Indiana University. New lawsuits continue to pile up with recent challenges to a Kentucky hospital, the University of Maryland and the University of California.
It's
less clear how courts could rule on a nationwide Labor Department
mandate. Emergency temporary standards do not go through as rigorous an
approval process as other federal rules and are subject to greater legal
scrutiny.
OSHA has only issued 10 emergency temporary standards since 1971, six of
them were challenged in court and only one was upheld. If the rule is
not carefully tailored to address the risk to workplace safety from
COVID-19, it could be overturned.
endpts | Two of the FDA’s most senior vaccine leaders are exiting from their positions, raising fresh questions about the Biden administration and the way that it’s sidelined the FDA.
Marion Gruber, director of the FDA’s Office of Vaccines Research & Review and 32-year veteran of the agency, will leave at the end of October, and OVRR deputy director Phil Krause, who’s been at FDA for more than a decade, will leave in November. The news, first reported by BioCentury, is a massive blow to confidence in the agency’s ability to regulate vaccines.
The bombshell announcement comes at a particularly crucial moment, as boosters and children’s shots are being weighed by the regulator. The departures also come as the administration has recently jumped ahead of the FDA’s reviews of booster shots, announcing that they might be available by the week of Sept. 20.
A former senior FDA leader told Endpoints that they’re departing because they’re frustrated that CDC and their ACIP committee are involved in decisions that they think should be up to the FDA. The former FDAer also said he’s heard they’re upset with CBER director Peter Marks for not insisting that those decisions should be kept inside FDA. What finally did it for them was the White House getting ahead of FDA on booster shots.
FDA’s former acting chief scientist Luciana Borio added on Twitter, “FDA is losing two giants who helped bring us many safe and effective vaccines over decades of public service.”
“These two are the leaders for Biologic (vaccine) review in the US. They have a great team, but these two are the true leaders of CBER. A huge global loss if they both leave,” Former BARDA director Rick Bright wrote, weighing in on the news. “Dr. Gruber is much more than the Director. She is a global leader. Visionary mastermind behind global clinical regulatory science for flu, Ebola, Mers, Zika, Sars-cov-2, many others.”
Trialsite | On August 25, NIH appeared in conference in federal court
in the District of New Jersey. The purpose of the appearance was for
resolution of Jin-Pyong Peter Yim v National Institutes of Health and
for scheduling of “motion practice”, if necessary. I am the plaintiff in
the case. Beneath the legal formalities, the case could reveal that NIH
deceived the nation on a treatment for COVID-19.
NIH is alleged to have violated the Freedom of Information
Act. NIH failed to respond to a document request made on January 28,
2021:
“All updates to the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19)
Treatment Guidelines that were endorsed by a vote of the Panel. (Date
Range for Record Search: From 01/01/2021 To 01/28/2021)”
The purpose of the FOIA request was not to obtain the
document. Rather, it was to know if a vote was held to endorse the NIH
recommendation on ivermectin. NIH violated FOIA because it did not
respond within the time defined by statute. A complaint was filed against the NIH on March 26, 2021 to appeal the non-response. NIH answered the complaint on June 30. The answer included an exhibit and testimony.
“You requested all updates to the Coronavirus Disease 2019
(COVID-19) Treatment Guidelines that were endorsed by a vote of the
Panel (Date range for record search from 01/01/2021 to 01/28/2021). All
approved updates to the guidelines are posted online and can be found here. The documents posted on this website respond to your request in full.”
I requested a change to the NIH response. The NIH response
is ambiguous as to whether the requested document exists. I provided a
URL that refers to a single document. I requested that that URL be given in the NIH FOIA response if that recommendation was endorsed by a vote.
The conference was presided over by Judge Lois H. Goodman.
She gave her opinion following discussion between the plaintiff and
defendant. She expressed skepticism of the legal basis for the
complaint. However, she urged further negotiation and allowed for
“motion practice” if no agreement was reached. Her concluding remarks
are here.
Following the conference, Judge Goodman also issued the following order:
“TEXT ORDER directing parties to confer to attempt
resolution to this dispute. Parties to report to the Court as to the
results of those efforts to resolve by 9/8/2021. If, matter cannot be
resolved, dispositive motions to be filed by 9/24/2021 and to be
returnable on 10/18/2021. Ms. Mahoney is directed to provide pro se
plaintiff with a copy of this text order. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge
Lois H. Goodman on 8/26/2021 .”
virginiastoner | Vaccine dangers hiding in plain sight
FACT: There has been a massive increase in deaths reported to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) this year. That’s not a ‘conspiracy theory’, that’s an indisputable fact. You can try to explain it or justify it, or even argue it doesn’t matter, but you can’t deny it.
We’re not talking about a modest increase in death reports, something we might chat about in concerned voices over Chai tea and bagels at a company mixer. We’re talking about a huge and unprecedented increase—so massive that in the last 4 months alone, VAERS has received over 40% of all death reports it has ever received in its entire 30+year history. So massive it’s literally “off the chart.” The first chart in the pair below shows VAERS death reports from 2014 thru 2020. If you tried to add the 2021 data to it, it would be way, way off the chart. The second chart shows how much detail was lost when the 2021 data was squeezed in.
The pair of charts below are another illustration. Notice all age groups had an increase in death reports from the COVID-19 vaccines—with both the 18-64 and 65+ age groups experiencing a dramatic “off the chart” increase.
The increase in VAERS death reports is not due to more vaccination
Even with the COVID-19 shots, the estimated total vaccines administered so far this year is less than the yearly average–because we are only a quarter of the way through this year. No doubt the vaccine count will climb much higher by the end of this year, but it’s not the reason for the massive increase in VAERS death reports over the last 4 months.
The following chart compares estimates of vaccines administered with deaths reported to VAERS, separating COVID-19 vaccines from other vaccines. The rate of reported deaths for other vaccines looks fairly normal; the massive increase is mainly from the COVID-19 vaccines.
There are many notes at the end of this paper about how the vaccine data was estimated, and where the data for these charts was obtained, along with the data table.
Begrudgingly Acknowledged Country Bangers
-
When someone says they hate country music, they’re typically referring,
whether they know it or not, to the neotraditionalist “young country” that
arose in...
A Foundation of Joy
-
Two years and I've lost count of how many times my eye has been operated
on, either beating the fuck out of the tumor, or reattaching that slippery
eel ...
April Three
-
4/3
43
When 1 = A and 26 = Z
March = 43
What day?
4 to the power of 3 is 64
64th day is March 5
My birthday
March also has 5 letters.
4 x 3 = 12
...
Return of the Magi
-
Lately, the Holy Spirit is in the air. Emotional energy is swirling out of
the earth.I can feel it bubbling up, effervescing and evaporating around
us, s...
New Travels
-
Haven’t published on the Blog in quite a while. I at least part have been
immersed in the area of writing books. My focus is on Science Fiction an
Historic...
Covid-19 Preys Upon The Elderly And The Obese
-
sciencemag | This spring, after days of flulike symptoms and fever, a man
arrived at the emergency room at the University of Vermont Medical Center.
He ...