cnbc | A group of some of the world’s most powerful oil producers on
Wednesday agreed to impose deep output cuts, seeking to spur a recovery
in crude prices despite calls from the U.S. to pump more to help the
global economy.
OPEC and non-OPEC allies, a group often referred
to as OPEC+, decided at their first face-to-face gathering in Vienna
since 2020 to reduce production by 2 million barrels per day from
November.
Energy market participants had expected OPEC+, which includes Saudi
Arabia and Russia, to impose output cuts of somewhere between 500,000
barrels and 2 million barrels.
The move represents a major
reversal in production policy for the alliance, which slashed output by a
record 10 million barrels per day in early 2020 when demand plummeted
due to the Covid-19 pandemic.
The oil cartel has since gradually unwound those record cuts, albeit
with several OPEC+ countries struggling to fulfill their quotas.
Oil
prices have fallen to roughly $80 a barrel from more than $120 in early
June amid growing fears about the prospect of a global economic
recession.
The production cut for November is an attempt to reverse this slide, despite repeated pressure from U.S. President Joe Biden’s administration for the group to pump more to lower fuel prices ahead of midterm elections next month.
White House ‘disappointed’
The
White House said in a statement that Biden was “disappointed by the
shortsighted decision by OPEC+ to cut production quotas while the global
economy is dealing with the continued negative impact of Putin’s invasion of Ukraine.”
It said that Biden had directed the Department of Energy to release another 10 million barrels from the Strategic Petroleum Reserve next month.
“In
light of today’s action, the Biden Administration will also consult
with Congress on additional tools and authorities to reduce OPEC’s
control over energy prices,” the White House said.
The statement
added that the OPEC+ announcement served as “a reminder of why it is so
critical that the United States reduce its reliance on foreign sources
of fossil fuels.”
To be sure, the burning of fossil fuels, such as coal, oil and gas, is the chief driver of the climate emergency.
ourfiniteworld | The economy is something that grows through the “dissipation” of
energy. Examples of dissipation of energy include the digestion of food
to give energy to humans, the burning of fossil fuels, and the use of
electricity to power a light bulb. A rise in world energy consumption is
highly correlated with growth in the world economy. Falling energy
consumption is associated with economic contraction.
In physics terms, the world economy is a dissipative structure, just
as all plants, animals and ecosystems are. All dissipative structures
have finite lifespans, including the world economy.
This finding is not well known because academic researchers seem to
operate in ivory towers. Researchers in economic departments aren’t
expected to understand physics and how it applies to the economy. In
fairness to academia, the discovery that the economy is a dissipative
structure did not occur until 1996.
It takes a long time for findings to filter through from one department
to another. Even now, I am one of a very small number of people in the
world writing about this issue.
Also, economic researchers are not expected to study the history of
the many smaller, more-localized civilizations that have collapsed in
the past. Typically, the population of these smaller civilizations
increased at the same time as the resources used by the population
started to degrade. The use of technology, such as dams to redirect
water flows, may have helped for a while, but eventually this was not
enough. The combination of declining availability of high quality
resources and increasing population tended to leave these civilizations
with little margin for dealing with the bad times that can be expected
to occur by chance. In many cases, such civilizations collapsed after
disease epidemics, a military invasion, or a climate fluctuation that
led to a series of crop failures.
counterpunch | Nations of the world are only too aware that fossil fuels need to be
phased out for two reasons. First, oil is a finite commodity. It’ll run
out in time. Secondly, fossil fuel emissions such as CO2 are destroying
the planet’s climate system.
However, a recent study puts a damper on the prospects of phasing out
fossil fuels in favor of renewables. More to the point, a phase out of
fossil fuels by mid century looks to be a nearly impossible Sisyphean
task. It’s all about quantities of minerals/metals contained in Mother
Earth. There aren’t enough.
Simon Michaux, PhD, Geological Survey Finland has done a detailed
study of what’s required to phase out fossil fuels in favor of
renewables, to wit:
“The quantity of metal required to make just one generation of
renewable tech units to replace fossil fuels is much larger than first
thought. Current mining production of these metals is not even close to
meeting demand. Current reported mineral reserves are also not enough in
size. Most concerning is copper as one of the flagged shortfalls.
Exploration for more at required volumes will be difficult, with this
seminar addressing these issues.” (Source: Simon P. Michaux, Associate
Research Professor of Geometallurgy Unit Minerals Processing and
Materials Research, Geological Survey of Finland, August 18, 2022 –
Seminar: What Would It Take To Replace The Existing Fossil Fuel System?)
Metals/minerals required to source gigafactories producing renewables
to power the world’s economies when fossil fuels phase out looks to be
one of the biggest quandaries of all time. There’s not enough metal.
Michaux researched and analyzed the current status of the internal
combustion engine fleet of cars, trucks, rail, maritime shipping, and
aviation for the US, Europe, and China, accessing databases to gather
information as a starting point for the study.
Michaux’s calculations for what’s required to phase out fossil fuels
uses a starting point of 2018 with 84.5% of primary energy still fossil
fuel-based and less than 1% of the world’s vehicle fleet electric.
Therefore, the first generation of renewable energy is only now coming
on stream, meaning there will be no recycling availability of production
materials for some time. Production will have to be sourced from
mining.
When Michaux presented basic information to EU analysts, it was a
shock to them. To his dismay, they had not put together the various
mineral/metal data requirements to phase out fossil fuels and replaced
by renewables. They assumed, using guesstimates, the metals would be
available.
southcom.mil | General Laura J. Richardson is a native of Northglenn, Colorado and a
graduate of Metropolitan State University of Denver, Colorado. She was
commissioned into the U.S. Army and trained as an Army Aviator. She
holds a Master of Science in National Resource Strategy from the
National Defense University’s Dwight D. Eisenhower School for National
Security and Resource Strategy.
U.S. SOUTHCOM Commander:"This region is so rich in resources.. it's off the charts rich."
"60% of the world's lithium is in the region; you have heavy crude, you have light sweet crude, you have rare earth elements, you have the Amazon.." pic.twitter.com/33dQ6EXKAo
General Richardson previously served as the Commanding General of
U.S. Army North (Fifth Army) at Fort Sam Houston, Texas, which is the
Army Service Component Command for U.S. Northern Command. Other
assignments as a General Officer include Deputy Commanding General of
U.S. Army Forces Command at Fort Bragg, North Carolina; Chief of Army
Legislative Liaison to the U.S. Congress in Washington D.C.; Deputy
Chief of Staff for Communications at Headquarters International Security
Assistance Force in support of Operation Enduring Freedom, Kabul,
Afghanistan; Deputy Commanding General of the 1st Cavalry Division at
Fort Hood, Texas; and Commanding General of the U.S. Army Operational
Test Command at Fort Hood, Texas.
Over her career General Richardson has commanded from the Company to
Theater Army level. She commanded an Assault Helicopter Battalion in
combat in the 101st Airborne Division (Air Assault), deploying her unit
from Fort Campbell, Kentucky to Iraq 2003-04, in support of Operation
Iraqi Freedom. She has also served in numerous staff assignments at a
myriad of locations, including Military Aide to the Vice President at
the White House in Washington, D.C., the Army’s Legislative Liaison to
Congress at the U.S. Capitol, and at the Pentagon as an Army Campaign
Planner.
General Richardson’s awards and decorations include the Defense
Distinguished Service Medal, Distinguished Service Medal (with Oak Leaf
Cluster), Defense Superior Service Medal (with Oak Leaf Cluster), Legion
of Merit (with three Oak Leaf Clusters), Bronze Star Medal, Meritorious
Service Medal (with four Oak Leaf Clusters), and the Air Medal (with
Numeral 7). She also has various unit, service and campaign awards, and
numerous badges, including the Combat Action Badge, Parachutist Badge,
Air Assault Badge, Senior Army Aviator Badge, Vice-Presidential Service
Badge and the Army Staff Identification Badge.
She is married to Lieutenant General Jim Richardson and they have one daughter and a grandchild.
John Helmer has an excellent article on the MH 17 "trial" in Holland and the
Dutch farmers' revolt. He traces the latter to the failure of Dutch
agribusiness plans to colonise ukraine and export its production,
employing cheap Ukrainian labour.
And, of course, being given the land cheaply.
"...Dutch analysts accuse Rutte of a Ukrainian
boomerang: the calculation was for Dutch agroindustries to invest in
Ukrainian farmland and crops with cheap labour and weak environmental
controls, with the dividends to flow back to The Netherlands
in cash. The Russian special military operation has killed that plan; instead, the Dutch died in MH17
and Ukrainian migrants are now moving into the country to take up state
money and drive the farmers off their land..."
The real beneficiaries of the Russian special military operation are going to be the people of Ukraine
whose government is intent on selling the nation's birthright for a few
billion delivered to offshore accounts. ...here's the link:
tfiglobal | The major issue African countries face even after the presence of
valuable minerals and metals under their soil is the unavailability of
technology and capital for extraction. Major developed countries with
the appropriate means are known to have considerable interest in African
countries majorly due to their resources.
Moscow has maintained strong relations with Kampala. Uganda’s President Yoweri Museveni did call Russia ‘Europe’s Center Of Gravity,’ and expressed strong support for the Kremlin amid the ongoing war.
The
EU’s and Biden’s disregard for the African nations has placed the West
in an unstrategic position there. Due to their broad disregard for the
food security and inflation problems in African nations, Biden and his
minions have lost all political clout in Africa. A master strategist
like Putin would never have missed this chance to solidify his position.
Putin’s Masterstroke
Biden
has done the damage and it is time for Putin to come into the picture
and take steps to strengthen the already powerful Russian economy.
Russia’s masterstroke to control a big chunk of the commodity market of
the world is making Moscow unbeatable and irreplaceable.
Uganda’s
reserves and Moscow’s interest in the region would be a demonstration of
a show of strength in this time of crisis. Russia’s interest in Uganda
is not newfound. Russian investors backed the first gold refinery in Uganda more than ten years ago.
The
refinery, established by Russian-owned Victoria Gold Star Limited, has a
capacity to process 1.2 tonnes of raw gold per month, the company’s
managing director told Reuters.
Of late, Russia has also taken
advantage of loopholes in sanctions and has strategically used its
humongous $140 Billion gold reserves to hold down its economic fort. You
see, gold is more of an elixir for Russia right now. Since Russia
invaded Crimea back in 2014, the Russian state has been constantly
working hard to steer its economy against the impact of sanctions. One
avenue to do so was to increase its gold reserves, as gold tends to soar
in times of conflict.
Putin also understands that the West cannot
just sanction commodities such as crude oil, grain and gold because
they would have severe repercussions on the global order. This is
precisely why Moscow is all set to assist Uganda in its future mining
endeavours and parallelly solidify its stronghold on the commodities
trade. Africa in general and Uganda, in particular, would soon become
one of the strongest allies of Russia.
journal-neo |Sadly, the Fed and
other central bankers lie. Raising interest rates is not to cure
inflation. It is to force a global reset in control over the world’s
assets, it’s wealth, whether real estate, farmland, commodity
production, industry, even water. The Fed knows very well that Inflation
is only beginning to rip across the global economy. What is unique is
that now Green Energy mandates across the industrial world are driving
this inflation crisis for the first time, something deliberately ignored
by Washington or Brussels or Berlin.
The global shortages
of fertilizers, soaring prices of natural gas, and grain supply losses
from global draught or exploding costs of fertilizers and fuel or the
war in Ukraine, guarantee that, at latest this September-October harvest
time, we will undergo a global additional food and energy price
explosion. Those shortages all are a result of deliberate policies.
Moreover, far worse
inflation is certain, due to the pathological insistence of the world’s
leading industrial economies led by the Biden Administration’s
anti-hydrocarbon agenda. That agenda is typified by the astonishing
nonsense of the US Energy Secretary stating, “buy E-autos instead” as
the answer to exploding gasoline prices.
Similarly, the
European Union has decided to phase out Russian oil and gas with no
viable substitute as its leading economy, Germany, moves to shut its
last nuclear reactor and close more coal plants. Germany and other EU
economies as a result will see power blackouts this winter and natural
gas prices will continue to soar. In the second week of June in Germany
gas prices rose another 60% alone. Both the Green-controlled German
government and the Green Agenda “Fit for 55” by the EU Commission
continue to push unreliable and costly wind and solar at the expense of
far cheaper and reliable hydrocarbons, insuring an unprecedented
energy-led inflation.
Fed has pulled the plug
With the 0.75% Fed
rate hike, largest in almost 30 years, and promise of more to come, the
US central bank has now guaranteed a collapse of not merely the US debt
bubble, but also much of the post-2008 global debt of $303 trillion.
Rising interest rates after almost 15 years mean collapsing bond values.
Bonds, not stocks, are the heart of the global financial system.
US mortgage rates
have now doubled in just 5 months to above 6%, and home sales were
already plunging before the latest rate hike. US corporations took on
record debt owing to the years of ultra-low rates. Some 70% of that debt
is rated just above “junk” status. That corporate non-financial debt
totaled $9 trillion in 2006. Today it exceeds $18 trillion. Now a large
number of those marginal companies will not be able to rollover the old
debt with new, and bankruptcies will follow in coming months. The
cosmetics giant Revlon just declared bankruptcy.
The
highly-speculative, unregulated Crypto market, led by Bitcoin, is
collapsing as investors realize there is no bailout there. Last November
the Crypto world had a $3 trillion valuation. Today it is less than
half, and with more collapse underway. Even before the latest Fed rate
hike the stock value of the US megabanks had lost some $300 billion. Now
with stock market further panic selling guaranteed as a global economic
collapse grows, those banks are pre-programmed for a new severe bank
crisis over the coming months.
As US economist Doug
Noland recently noted, “Today, there’s a massive “periphery” loaded with
“subprime” junk bonds, leveraged loans, buy-now-pay-later, auto, credit
card, housing, and solar securitizations, franchise loans, private
Credit, crypto Credit, DeFi, and on and on. A massive infrastructure has
evolved over this long cycle to spur consumption for tens of millions,
while financing thousands of uneconomic enterprises. The “periphery” has
become systemic like never before. And things have started to Break.”
The Federal
Government will now find its interest cost of carrying a record $30
trillion in Federal debt far more costly. Unlike the 1930s Great
Depression when Federal debt was near nothing, today the Government,
especially since the Biden budget measures, is at the limits. The US is
becoming a Third World economy. If the Fed no longer buys trillions of
US debt, who will? China? Japan? Not likely.
sonar21 | Until Joe Biden took office I thought that George W Bush had dibs on the “stupidest foreign policy blunder in history” award. His decision to invade Iraq rather than eliminate Al Qaeda hurt the United States and fueled international terrorism. But leave it to Joe Biden to one-up W by imposing sanctions on Russia that are inflicting an economic holocaust on the United States and Europe. Heck of a job, Joe.
The ostensible reason for “punishing” Russia with sanctions that actually pummel the west was Putin’s invasion of Ukraine. Now we all know that Ukraine was/is the poorest nation in Europe. Right?
Ukraine is one of the worst off countries after the collapse of the USSR. It is the poorest country in Europe despite having a huge aerospace industry, natural resources and some of the most fertile land for agriculture. During the communist era, Ukraine was the breadbasket of the Soviet Union. Despite all this, Ukrainians have experienced terrible famines such as the Stalinist Holodomor.
Today, the situation is not much better. Apart from enduring a war with Russia, its political system is particularly corrupt. Almost the entire economy is in the hands of big oligarchs: millionaires who amass fortunes thanks to their connections with political power.
Let me share with you some critical facts about Ukraine and its economic potential. When you consider these facts you will likely wonder why Ukraine is not one of the richest nations in Europe.
UKRAINE IS:
1st in Europe in proven recoverable uranium ore reserves; 2nd place in Europe and 10th place in the world in titanium ore reserves; 2nd place in the world in terms of explored reserves of manganese ores (2.3 billion tons, or 12% of world reserves); The 2nd largest iron ore reserves in the world (30 billion tons); 2nd place in Europe in mercury ore reserves; 3rd place in Europe (13th place in the world) in terms of shale gas reserves (22 trillion cubic meters) 4th place in the world in terms of the total value of natural resources; 7th place in the world in coal reserves (33.9 billion tons)
Ukraine is an important agricultural country: 1st in Europe in terms of arable land area; 3rd place in the world by the area of chernozem (25% of the world volume); 1st place in the world in the export of sunflower and sunflower oil; 2nd place in the world in barley production and 4th place in barley export; 3rd largest producer and 4th largest exporter of corn in the world; The 4th largest potato producer in the world; The 5th largest rye producer in the world; 5th place in the world for honey production (75,000 tons); 8th place in the world in wheat exports; 9th place in the world in the production of chicken eggs; 16th place in the world in cheese exports.
Ukraine can meet the food needs of 600 million people.
indianpunchline | The fact that the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) member states held a
joint ministerial meeting with their Russian counterpart Foreign
Minister Sergey Lavrov in the Saudi capital of Riyadh at this point in
time in global politics conveys a powerful message in itself.
To
drive home the message in no uncertain terms, the Saudi Foreign
Minister Prince Faisal bin Farhan Al Saud said at a press conference
following the ministerial on Wednesday that the GCC member-countries
share a common stance with respect to the crisis in Ukraine. (The news
conference was broadcast live by the Al-Arabiya TV channel.)
“The
countries of the Persian Gulf share a common stance regarding the
Ukrainian crisis and its negative consequences, especially with regard
to the food security of other countries,” Al Saud said.
For
his part, Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov told the media that
“the GCC countries understand the nature of the conflict between Russia
and the West.” Earlier, during a bilateral with Lavrov who was on a
2-day visit, Al Saud said the “the kingdom’s position regarding the
crisis in Ukraine is based on the principles of international law and
support for efforts aimed at achieving a political solution to the
crisis.”
After the meeting, Lavrov said the GCC countries will not
join the West in imposing sanctions on Moscow over the conflict in
Ukraine. In his words, “Aspects of the international situation, which
are connected with the events unfolded by the West around Ukraine, are
well understood by our partners from the Gulf Cooperation Council
states.”
Lavrov added, “We appreciate and reaffirmed today once
again the balanced position that they take towards this issue at
international forums, and in practice, refusing to join the
illegitimate, unilateral Western sanctions that were introduced against
Russia.”
Lavrov said
Moscow and Gulf countries intended to further develop their partnership
in sharp contrast with the growing tensions between Russia and the US
and its European allies. After meeting with the top diplomats of the
UAE, Kuwait, Qatar, Bahrain and Oman in Riyadh, Lavrov said, “We
reaffirmed our focus on the comprehensive development of our
partnership, including in the new conditions that are emerging in the
world economy in the context of the policies of our Western colleagues.”
Looking
ahead, Lavrov expressed satisfaction that “We reaffirmed our focus on
the comprehensive development of our partnership, including in the new
conditions that are emerging in the world economy in the context of the
policies of our Western colleagues.”
The
timing of the GCC-Russia ministerial and Lavrov’s visit to Riyadh is
highly significant at a juncture when the Biden Administration is
pulling out all the stops to repair the US’ fractured relationship with
Saudi Arabia ever since Candidate Biden famously christened the Kingdom
as a “Pariah state” and the Washington establishment launched a
concerted campaign to defame the Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman
personally over the killing of the ex-CIA consultant Jamal Khashoggi.
theintercept |Before he walked into the Tops
Friendly Market in Buffalo, New York, on a mission to murder as many
innocent Black shoppers as he could, 18-year-old Payton Gendron posted a
rambling manifesto online outlining his motives.
His reasoning was familiar from other far-right shooters:
This country isn’t going to be resource-rich enough for everyone in the
future, so a race war over what is left is necessary today. However
heinous, this vision of a bleak, impoverished future, in which there is
not enough wealth to go around and the environment is near collapse, is
motivating an ever-growing number of young men like him to carry out
racist massacres across the West.
People who commit acts of terrorism tend to
act for more than one reason. The racist hatred of Gendron toward Black
Americans, Jews, and immigrants was ultimately what made his murders
possible. For that, many are to blame, including far-right politicians
and talking heads who have continued to wink at the “great replacement”
as being the true source of white Westerners’ troubles.
Addressing this violence, though, also requires considering the role
of scarcity — not a conspiracy theory, but a very real system of extreme
inequality and ecological destruction. It is a system in which the most
wealthy and powerful continue to see their wealth and power grow — at
the expense of the masses. Faced with actual strained resources and
environmental calamity, some of these forsaken people are turning to
dark fantasies like the “great replacement theory” to make sense of it
all.
This is not just about a toxic media ecosystem, but the larger way we
have organized our lives in the West. This organizational structure
could go by many names — neoliberalism, consumer capitalism,
exploitation — but there can be little doubt that the pessimism it
engenders is leading many young people into nihilism.
strategic-culture | It was something to behold. Dmitri Medvedev, former Russian
President, unrepentant Atlanticist, current deputy chairman of the
Russian Security Council, decided to go totally unplugged in an outburst
matching the combat star turn of Mr. Khinzal that delivered palpable
shock and awe all across NATOstan.
Medvedev said “hellish” Western sanctions not only have failed to
cripple Russia, but are instead “returning to the West like a
boomerang.” Confidence in reserve currencies is “fading like the morning
mist”, and ditching the US dollar and the euro is not unrealistic
anymore: “The era of regional currencies is coming.”
After all, he added, “no matter if they want it or not, they’ll have
to negotiate a new financial order (…) And the decisive voice will then
be with those countries that have a strong and advanced economy, healthy
public finances and a reliable monetary system.”
Medvedev relayed his succinct analysis even before D Day – as in the
deadline this Thursday established by President Putin after which
payments for Russian gas by “unfriendly nations” will only be accepted
in rubles.
The G7, predictably, had struck a (collective) pose: we won’t pay.
“We” means the 4 that are not large Russian gas importers. “We”,
moreover, means the Empire of Lies dictating the rules. As for the 3
that will be in dire straits, not only they are major importers but also
happen to be WWII losers – Germany, Italy and Japan, still de facto
occupied territories. History does have a habit of playing perverted
tricks.
Denial didn’t last long. Germany was the first to break – even before
industrialists from Ruhr to Bavaria staged a mass revolt. Scholz, the
puny Chancellor, called Putin, who had to explain the obvious: payments
are being converted into rubles because the EU froze Russia’s foreign
exchange reserves – in a crass violation of international law.
With Taoist patience, Putin also expressed hope this would not
represent a deterioration in contract terms for European importers.
Russian and German experts should sit down together and discuss the new
terms.
Moscow is working on a set of documents defining the new deal.
Essentially, that spells out no rubles, no gas. Contracts become null
and void once you violate trust. The US and the EU broke legally biding
agreements with unilateral sanctions and on top of it confiscated
foreign reserves of a – nuclear – G20 nation.
The unilateral sanctions made dollars and euros worthless to Russia.
Hysteria fits won’t cut it: this will be resolved – but under Russia’s
terms. Period. The Foreign Ministry had already warned that refusal to
pay for gas in rubles would lead to a serious global crisis of
non-payments and serial global-level bankruptcies, a hellish chain
reaction of blocked transactions, freezing of collateral assets and
closures of credit lines.
What will happen next is partially predictable. EU companies will
receive the new set of rules. They will have time to examine the
documents and make a decision. Those that say “no” will be automatically
excluded from receiving direct Russian gas shipments – all
politico-economic consequences included.
There will be some compromise, of course. For instance, quite a few
EU nations will accept to use rubles and increase their gas acquisitions
so they may resell the surplus to their neighbors and make a profit.
And some may also decide to buy gas on the go on energy exchanges.
So Russia is not imposing an ultimatum on anybody. The whole thing
will take time – a rolling process. With some sideway action as well.
The Duma is contemplating the extension of payment in rubles to other
essential products – such as oil, metals, timber, wheat. It will depend
on the collective voracity of the EU chihuahuas. Everyone knows that
their non-stop hysteria may translate into a colossal rupture of supply
chains across the West.
Bye bye oligarchs
While the Atlanticist ruling classes have gone totally berserk but
still remain focused on fighting to the last European to extract any
remaining, palpable EU wealth, Russia is playing it cool. Moscow has
been quite lenient in fact, brandishing the specter of no gas in Spring
rather than Winter.
The Russian Central Bank nationalized foreign exchange earnings of
all major exporters. There was no default. The ruble keeps rising – and
is now back to roughly the same level before Operation Z. Russia
remains self-sufficient, food-wise. American hysteria over “isolated”
Russia is laughable. Every actor that matters across Eurasia – not to
mention the other 4 BRICS and virtually the whole Global South – did not
demonize and/or sanction Russia.
As an extra bonus, arguably the last oligarch capable of influence in
Moscow, Anatoly Chubais, is gone. Call it another momentous historical
trickery: Western sanction hysteria de facto dismembered Russian
oligarchy – Putin’s pet project since 2000. What that implies is the
strengthening of the Russian state and the consolidation of Russian
society.
We still don’t have all the facts, but a case can be made that after
years of careful evaluation Putin opted to really go for broke and break
the West’s back – using that trifecta (imminent blitzkrieg on Donbass;
US bioweapon labs; Ukraine working on nuclear weapons) as the casus
belli.
ourfiniteworld | The attacks by Russia of Ukrainian sites seems to be occurring, for
many related reasons. It can no longer tolerate being inadequately
compensated for the resources it is extracting and selling to Ukraine
and the rest of the world. It is tired of being “pushed around” by the
rich economies, especially the United States, as NATO adds more
countries. It is also tired of NATO training Ukrainian soldiers. Russia
seems to have no plan to gain the entire territory of Ukraine; it is more of a temporary police action.
Russia’s underlying problem is that it can no longer produce
commodities that the world wants as inexpensively as the world demands.
Building all the infrastructure needed to extract and ship more fossil
fuel resources would take more capital spending than Russia can afford.
The selling price will never rise high enough to justify these
investments, including the cost of the Nord Stream 2 pipeline. Russia
has nothing to lose at this point. The current situation is not working;
going back to it is no incentive for stopping the current conflict.
Russia is in some ways like a heavily armed, suicidal old man, who
can no longer earn an adequate living. The economic system of Russia is
no longer working as it should. Russia is incredibly well-armed. The
situation reminds a person of the story of Samson,
in his old age, taking down the temple of the Philistines and losing
his own life at the same time. Russia has no reason to back down in
response to sanctions.
Leaders of the world, including Joe Biden, appear to be oblivious to the situation we are facing.
Leaders of the world have created ridiculous narratives that overlook
the critical role commodities play. They seem to believe that it is
possible to cut off purchases from Russia with, at most, temporary harm
to the rest of the world economy.
The history of the world shows that the populations of many
civilizations have outgrown their resource bases and have collapsed.
Physics points out that this outcome is almost inevitable because of the
way the Universe is constructed. Everything is constantly evolving,
even economies. The climate is constantly evolving, as are the species
inhabiting the Earth.
Elected leaders need a story of everlasting growth that they can tell their citizens. They cannot even consider the physics-based way the world economy operates, and the resulting expected pattern of overshoot and collapse. Modelers of what are intended to be long-lasting structures cannot accept this outcome either.
Limits which are defined based on affordability of end products are
incredibly difficult to model, so creative narratives have been
developed suggesting that humans can move away from fossil fuels if they
so desire. No one stops to think that economies cannot continue to
exist using a much lower quantity of energy, any more than an adult
human can get along on 500 calories a day. Both are dissipative
structures; the ongoing energy requirement is built in. Factories close
when electricity, diesel and other energy products are cut off.
The sanctions and the Russia-Ukraine conflict cannot end well.
The world economy is already on the edge of collapse because of the
resource limits it is hitting. Intentionally stopping Russia’s output of
resources like fertilizer and processed uranium is certain to make the
situation worse, not better. Once Russia’s output is stopped, it is
likely to be impossible to restart Russia’s production at the same
level. Trained workers who lose their jobs will likely find jobs
elsewhere, for one thing. The shortfall in output will affect countries
around the world.
The United States dollar is now the world’s reserve currency. The
sanctions being applied indirectly encourage counties to use other
currencies to work around the sanctions. There seems to be a substantial
chance that the US economy will lose its role as the center of
international trade. If such a change takes place, the US will no longer
be able to import far more than it exports, year after year.
A major issue is the huge amount of debt most countries of the world
have. With a rapidly slowing world economy, repaying debt with interest
will become impossible. Debt defaults will further wreak havoc with the
world economic system.
We don’t know the exact timing of how this will play out, but the situation does not look good.
commondreams | There are many reasons for Russia's invasion. Some concern politics,
history, culture, and territory—including preventing NATO expansion. Not
often mentioned, however, is that this small country has 5% of the earth's natural and mineral resources,
including coal, oil, natural gas (2nd most in Europe), lithium (for
batteries), iron ore (for industry), titanium (20% of proven world
reserves, for aerospace) and gallium (2nd most in world, for
electronics). Ukraine is also incredibly rich agriculturally—1st
in Europe in arable land and 25% of the world's volume of black soil
—capable of meeting the food needs of 600 million people.
This is more than a political war. It's a resource war.
Immense
resources translate to immense wealth—and power. Russia wants control
over them. So do western nations and transnational
corporations—including energy, mining, and agricultural companies. U.S. military contractors—Raytheon
and Lockheed Martin corporations—are telling their investors the
tensions are good for business, while General Dynamics corporation
boasts that past such disputes have expanded their bottom line.
The
U.S. has committed more than $3 billion in military assistance to
Ukraine since 2014, including $350 million worth of weapons recently
authorized by President Biden. Lobbying and political campaign contributions
by the weapons industry will surely be a factor in continuing the flow
of arms. To the degree that energy, mining, and agricultural
corporations believe they can eventually grab a piece of Ukrainian
resources, they too will use their never-intended First Amendment corporate constitutional rights to press Congress for more funding.
Wars
are not only, in general, profitable to weapons makers and corporations
that directly benefit from occupations and any eventual access to raw
materials and cheap labor. Justification for a "permanent war economy"
(which best describes our national economic policy) also greatly
benefits other corporations.
Financial corporations (part of the largest single sector of campaign contributions to federal candidates and parties)
profit from war. They facilitate the selling of U.S. Treasury debt
bonds to foreign nations (since most military spending increases the
nation's debt). They also provide loans internationally to rebuild
war-torn nations and domestically to communities (via purchasing
municipal bonds with high yields) to fill the gap of declining public
funding. Past and current military spending equals 48% of all spent federal tax dollars.
Relatedly,
federal spending priorities favoring militarism over funding to states
and communities have placed greater pressure on them to provide basic
human and community needs—from programs addressing poverty, health care,
education, hunger, homelessness, the environment and physical
infrastructure. Privatization/corporatization of public assets—roads,
water/sewer systems, utilities, prisons, schools, airports, rail/bus
services, medical services—is increasingly the result, much to the
delight of slews of corporate entities more than willing to monetize and
profit from what formerly had been publicly funded public services.
Smedley Butler, a retired U.S. Marine Corp Major General, gave a speech in 1935 entitled "War is a Racket."
In it, he said, "I spent thirty-three years and four months in active
military service as a member of this country's most agile military
force, the Marine Corps...I spent most of my time being a high class
muscle-man for Big Business, for Wall Street and for the Bankers. In
short, I was a racketeer, a gangster for capitalism…"
johnhelmer | The ancient difference between the confiscation of your assets and a
tax by force was the mandate of Heaven. This was the public announcement
from God, transmitted through fellows wearing funny hats and costumes
accompanied by drumbeats and whistles. When God wants to stick you up,
they said, you’d better hand over your money or your life.
These days the rulers of the US, the European Union (EU) and Canada
call this the “Rules Based Order”. That’s to say: I make the rules, you
take my orders. The meaning is still the ancient one – your money or
your life.
The Chinese empire has been famous for a dress-up ceremony in which
those who made the rules received the agreement of those who took the
orders. It was called the kowtow. Nine kowtow was the standard, plus
expensive gifts. The Roman empire and most of its successors, called it tributum,
tribute. Over the years, other names for it have been tax, protection
money, and a gender specific form of kowtow popular in England and
France called the ius primae noctis, droit de seigneur, or lord’s right.
The quaintness of the ceremony varies from place to place. The
British empire demanded its colonial peoples wave a small Union Jack in
the left-hand corner of their independence flag. They also required
their subject children’s pilgrimage at least once in their lives to the
fence of Buckingham Palace in London for at least one performance of the
Changing of the Guard.
In keeping with the times since 1945, the US empire has been more
straightforward. It doesn’t require pilgrimages to the White House fence
for children of tender age. It does require you keep the US dollar in
your pocket, or the local currency whose value is fixed in proportion,
and whose state surpluses of taxation and pension funds must be stored
in US Treasury notes, as well as the dollar.
In Russia, starting in 1991, Boris Yeltsin innovated on these
measures by inviting US advisors to run the Russian economy, which
Yeltsin paid for by imposing a 100% tax on ordinary Russians’ salaries.
This started the system of oligarchs whom Yeltsin allowed to dispatch
and store, tax free, in the US, UK and EU as much state capital and
income as they could carry off. How that system has worked for the past
thirty years, oligarch by oligarch, has been the subject of analysis here. The effort has not gone without recognition.
At this very moment, the oligarchs are facing a Christian tax, but
it’s not the Russian one you might think they have earned. Instead, the
100% tax is being imposed in the form of confiscation statutes by the US, UK and EU.
This is not economic warfare so much as the application of the
principle that what the oligarchs have been doing to Russians should now
be done to them, according to the Mandate of Heaven as recorded in the
Gospel of Matthew 7:12, Luke 6:31.
The Mandate of Heaven can also be found on the bottom of the US
dollar note. That’s the signature line where the Treasurer of the United
States and the Secretary of the Treasury promise to pay “all debts
public and private”. Like other US treaty signatures, this no longer
applies to Russians, common ones, oligarchs, or the state, according to
this novelty in the Rules Based Order. Russians must now sell
everything in the country of value for US dollars – oil, gas, coal,
uranium, aluminium, titanium, wheat, potash, urea, bank loan debts,
airplane leases, etc. But those dollars cannot be used by Russians to
buy anything else. That value has been confiscated.
The response is still being formulated in Moscow. Russian government
officials, members of the State Duma, the Central Bank of Russia, the
General Staff, the oligarchs and their lobbyists have yet to agree. The
terms of the debate are still largely secret; here was an opening shot against the Central Bank by Sergei Glazyev.
permaculturenews | The next circle of denial revolves around what must inevitably come
to pass if the Goddess of Technology were to fail us: a series of wars
over ever more scarce resources. Paul Roberts, who is very well informed
on the subject of peak oil, has this to say: "what desperate states
have always done when resources turn scarce… [is] fight for them." [
MotherJones.com, 11/12 2004] Let us not argue that this has never
happened, but did it ever amount to anything more than a futile gesture
of desperation? Wars take resources, and, when resources are already
scarce, fighting wars over resources becomes a lethal exercise in
futility. Those with more resources would be expected to win. I am not
arguing that wars over resources will not occur. I am suggesting that
they will be futile, and that victory in these conflicts will be barely
distinguishable from defeat. I would also like to suggest that these
conflicts would be self-limiting: modern warfare uses up prodigious
amounts of energy, and if the conflicts are over oil and gas
installations, then they will get blown up, as has happened repeatedly
in Iraq. This will result in less energy being available and,
consequently, less warfare.
Take, for example, the last two US involvements in Iraq. In each
case, as a result of US actions, Iraqi oil production decreased. It now
appears that the whole strategy is a failure. Supporting Saddam, then
fighting Saddam, then imposing sanctions on Saddam, then finally
overthrowing him, has left Iraqi oil fields so badly damaged that the
"ultimate recoverable" estimate for Iraqi oil is now down to 10-12% of
what was once thought to be underground (according to the New York
Times).
Some people are even suggesting a war over resources with a nuclear
endgame. On this point, I am optimistic. As Robert McNamara once
thought, nuclear weapons are too difficult to use. And although he has
done a great deal of work to make them easier to use, with the
introduction of small, tactical, battlefield nukes and the like, and
despite recently renewed interest in nuclear "bunker busters," they
still make a bit of a mess, and are hard to work into any sort of a
sensible strategy that would reliably lead to an increased supply of
energy. Noting that conventional weapons have not been effective in this
area, it is unclear why nuclear weapons would produce better results.
But these are all details; the point I really want to make is that
proposing resource wars, even as a worst-case scenario, is still a form
of denial. The implicit assumption is this: if all else fails, we will
go to war; we will win; the oil will flow again, and we will be back to
business as usual in no time. Again, I would suggest against waiting
around for the success of a global police action to redirect the lion’s
share of the dwindling world oil supplies toward the United States.
Outside this last circle of denial lies a vast wilderness called the
Collapse of Western Civilization, roamed by the Four Horsemen of the
Apocalypse, or so some people will have you believe. Here we find not
denial but escapism: a hankering for a grand finale, a heroic final
chapter. Civilizations do collapse – this is one of the best-known facts
about them – but as anyone who has read The Decline and Fall of the
Roman Empire will tell you, the process can take many centuries.
What tends to collapse rather suddenly is the economy. Economies,
too, are known to collapse, and do so with far greater regularity than
civilizations. An economy does not collapse into a black hole from which
no light can escape. Instead, something else happens: society begins to
spontaneously reconfigure itself, establish new relationships, and
evolve new rules, in order to find a point of equilibrium at a lower
rate of resource expenditure.
Note that the exercise carries a high human cost: without an economy,
many people suddenly find themselves as helpless as newborn babes. Many
of them die, sooner than they would otherwise: some would call this a
"die-off." There is a part of the population that is most vulnerable:
the young, the old, and the infirm; the foolish and the suicidal. There
is also another part of the population that can survive indefinitely on
insects and tree bark. Most people fall somewhere in between.
Economic collapse gives rise to new, smaller and poorer economies.
That pattern has been repeated many times, so we can reason inductively
about similarities and differences between a collapse that has already
occurred and one that is about to occur. Unlike astrophysicists, who can
confidently predict whether a given star will collapse into a neutron
star or a black hole based on measurements and calculations, we have to
work with general observations and anecdotal evidence. However, I hope
that my thought experiment will allow me to guess correctly at the
general shape of the new economy, and arrive at survival strategies that
may be of use to individuals and small communities.
ourfiniteworld |[9] The public has been led to believe that vaccines are the
only solution to COVID-19 when, in fact, they are at best a very poor
and temporary band-aid.
Vaccines are a tempting solution because the benefits have been
oversold and no one has explained how poorly today’s leaky vaccines
really work.
We are already past the period when these vaccines were well matched
with the viruses they were aimed at. Now we are in a situation in which
the viruses are constantly mutating, and the vaccines need to be
updated. The catch is that the variants stick around for such a short
time period that by the time the vaccine is updated, there is likely to
be yet another new variant that the new vaccine does not really match up
with well.
Requirements that employees be vaccinated against COVID-19 cannot be
expected to provide much benefit to employers because workers will still
be out sick with COVID-19. This happens because they are likely to
catch a variant such as Delta, which does not line up with the original
vaccine. Perhaps they will be out for a shorter period, and their
hospital bills will be lower. These types of benefits are what people
have expected of influenza vaccines. There is no reason for them to
expect more of the new COVID-19 vaccines.
Even with 100% vaccination herd immunity can never be reached because
the vaccine encourages the virus to mutate into more virulent forms.
Each new variant stays around for only a few months, making it hard for
vaccine makers to keep up with the changing nature of the problem.
Vaccine makers can expect to face a constant battle in having to run to
stay even. Someone will have to convince citizens that each new vaccine
makes sense, even though injuries reported
to the US Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System seem to be much more
frequent than those reported for vaccines for other diseases.
An erroneous, one-sided story is being told to the general public, in
part because the pharmaceutical lobby is incredibly powerful. It has
the support of influential people, such as Anthony Fauci and Bill Gates.
The pharmaceutical industry can make billions of dollars in income from
the sale of vaccines, with little in the way of sales expenses. The
industry has managed to convince people that it is OK to sell these
vaccines, even though injury rates are very high compared to those for
vaccines in general.
Vaccines are being pushed in large part because the pharmaceutical
industry needs a money maker. It also wants to be seen as having
cutting-edge technology, so young people will be attracted to the field.
It cannot admit to anyone that technologies from decades ago would
perhaps work better to solve the COVID-19 problem.
[10] The pharmaceutical industry has been telling the world
that inexpensive drugs can’t fix our problem. However, there are several
low-cost drugs that appear helpful.
One drug that is being overlooked is ivermectin,
which was discovered in the late 1970s. It was originally introduced as
a veterinary drug to cure parasitic infections in animals. In the U.
S., ivermectin has been used since 1987 for eliminating parasites such
as ringworm in humans. Ivermectin seems to cure COVID-19
in humans, but it needs a higher dosage than has been previously
approved. Also, it would not be a money maker for the pharmaceutical
industry.
The possible use of ivermectin to cure COVID-19 seems to have been intentionally hidden. At approximately 32:45 in this linked video,
Dr. David Martin explains how Moderna announced ivermectin’s utility in
treating SARS (which is closely related to SARS-CoV-2) in its 2016-2018
patent modification related to the SARS virus. It sounds as though
Moderna (and others) have participated both in developing harmful
viruses and in developing vaccines to cure very closely related viruses.
They then work to prevent the sale of cheap drugs that might reduce
their sales of vaccines. This seems unconscionable.
Vitamin D, in high enough doses, taken well before exposure to the
virus that causes COVID-19, seems to lead to reduced severity of the
disease, and may eliminate some cases completely.
Various steroid drugs are often used in the later stages of
COVID-19, when conditions warrant it. The medical community seems to
have no difficulty with these.
Monoclonal antibodies are also used in the treatment of COVID-19, but they are much more expensive.
[11] Conclusion. Governments, businesses, and citizens need
to understand that today’s vaccines are not really solutions to our
COVID-19 problem. At the same time, they need better solutions.
Current vaccines have been badly oversold. They can be expected to
make the mutation problem worse, and they don’t stop the spread of
variants. Instead, we need to start quickly to make ivermectin and other
inexpensive drugs available through healthcare systems. People do need
some sort of solution to the problem of COVID-19 illnesses; it just
turns out that the current vaccines work so poorly that they probably
should not be part of the solution.
The whole idea of vaccine passports is absurd. Even with the vaccine,
people will catch the new COVID-19 variants, and they will pass them on
to others. Perhaps they may get lighter symptoms, so that they will be
off work for a shorter length of time, but there still will be
disruption. If those who catch COVID-19 can instead take ivermectin at a
high enough dose at the first sign of illness, many (or most) of them
can get well in a few days and avoid hospitalization completely. Other
medications may be helpful as well.
I am skeptical that masks can do any good with the high level of
transmission of Delta. But at least masks aren’t very harmful. We
probably need to go along with what is requested by officials.
It is becoming clear that today’s pharmaceutical industry is far too
powerful. Investigations need to be made into the large number of
allegations against it and its leaders. Why did members of the
pharmaceutical industry find it necessary to patent viruses, and then
later sell vaccines for a virus closely related to the viruses it had
patented?
scitechdaily | In a paper published today (January 13, 2021) in the journal Frontiers in Conservation Science,
the researchers cite more than 150 scientific studies and conclude,
“That we are already on the path of a sixth major extinction is now
scientifically undeniable.”
Among the paper’s co-authors is Daniel Blumstein, a UCLA professor of
ecology and evolutionary biology and member of the UCLA Institute of
the Environment and Sustainability.
Because too many people have underestimated the severity of the
crisis and have ignored experts’ warnings, scientists must continue
speaking out, said Blumstein, author of the 2020 book “The Nature of
Fear: Survival Lessons from the Wild” — but they also must avoid either
sugarcoating the overwhelming challenges or inducing feelings of
despair.
“Without fully appreciating and broadcasting the scale of the
problems and the enormity of the solutions required, society will fail
to achieve even modest sustainability goals, and catastrophe will surely
follow,” he said. “What we are saying is frightening, but we must be
both candid and vocal if humanity is to understand the enormity of the
challenges we face in creating a sustainable future.”
The Earth has experienced five mass extinctions, each accounting for a
loss of more than 70% of all species on the planet. The most recent was
66 million years ago. Now, the paper reports, projected temperature
increases and other human assaults on the environment mean that
approximately 1 million of the planet’s 7 million to 10 million species
are threatened with extinction in the coming decades.
Blumstein said that level of damage could occur
within the next several decades; an extinction affecting as many as 70%
of all species — like the earlier mass extinctions cited in the paper —
could potentially occur within the next few centuries.
One of the major trends discussed in the paper is the explosive
growth of the planet’s human population. There are now 7.8 billion
people, more than double the Earth’s population just 50 years ago. And
by 2050, the figure is likely to reach 10 billion, the scientists write,
which would cause or exacerbate numerous serious problems. For example,
more than 700 million people are starving and more than 1 billion are
malnourished already; both figures are likely to increase as the
population grows.
Population growth also greatly increases the risk for pandemics, the
authors write, because most new infectious diseases result from
human–animal interactions, humans live closer to wild animals than ever
before and wildlife trade is continuing to increase significantly.
Population growth also contributes to rising unemployment and, when
combined with a hotter Earth, leads to more frequent and intense
flooding and fires, poorer water and air quality, and worsening human
health.
theguardian |Normalcy and the restoration of a modicum of decorum to the White House: that is what many elite supporters of Joe Biden
hope for now that he has won the election. But the rest of us are
turned off by this meagre ambition. Voters who loathe Trump celebrate
his loss, but the majority rue the return to what used to pass as normal
or ethical.
When Trump contracted Covid-19, his opponents feared he might benefit
from a sympathy vote. But Trump is not a normal president seeking
voters’ sympathy. He doesn’t do sympathy. He neither needs nor banks on
it. Trump trades on anger, weaponises hatred and meticulously cultivates
the dread with which the majority of Americans have been living after
the financial bubble burst in 2008. Obscenities and contempt for the
rules of polite society were his means of connecting with a large
section of American society.
The reason 2008 was a momentous year wasn’t just because of the
magnitude of the crisis, but because it was the year when normality was
shattered once-and-for-all. The original postwar social contract broke
in the early 1970s, yielding permanent real median earnings stagnation.
It was replaced by a promise to America’s working class of another route
to prosperity: rising house prices and financialised pension schemes.
When Wall Street’s house of cards collapsed in 2008, so did this postwar
social contract between America’s working class and its rulers.
After the crash of 2008, big business deployed the central bank money
that refloated Wall Street to buy back their own shares, sending share
prices (and, naturally, their directors’ bonuses) through the
stratosphere while starving Main Street of serious investment in
good-quality jobs. A majority of Americans were thus treated, in quick
succession, to negative equity, home repossessions, collapsing pension
kitties and casualised work – all that against the spectacle of watching
wealth and power concentrate in the hands of so few.
By 2016, the majority of Americans were deeply frustrated. On the one
hand, they lived with the private anguish caused by the permanent
austerity to which their communities had been immersed since 2008. And,
on the other, they could see a ruling class whose losses were socialised
by the government, which defined the response to the crash.
Donald Trump
simply took advantage of that frustration. And he did so with tactics
that, to this day, keep his liberal opponents in disarray. Democrats
protested that Trump was a nobody, and thus unfit to be president. That
did not work in a society shaped by media which for years elevated
inconsequential celebrities.
Even worse for Trump’s opponents, portraying him as incompetent is an
own goal: Donald J Trump is not merely incompetent. George W Bush was
incompetent. No, Trump is much worse than that. Trump combines gross
incompetence with rare competence. On the one hand, he cannot string two
decent sentences together to make a point, and has failed spectacularly
to protect millions of Americans from Covid-19. But, on the other hand,
he tore up Nafta, the North American Free Trade Agreement that took
decades to put together. Remarkably, he replaced it swiftly with one
that is certainly not worse – at least from the perspective of American
blue-collar workers or, even, Mexican factory workers who now enjoy an
hourly wage considerably greater than before.
Moreover, despite his belligerent posturing, Trump not only kept his
promise to not start new wars but, additionally, he withdrew American
troops from a variety of theatres where their presence had caused
considerable misery with no tangible benefits for peace or, indeed,
American influence.
consciousnessofsheep | The geology of US oil might have been
straightforward; the economics was a little trickier. In the course of
the Second World War, the USA supplied six out of every seven barrels of
oil consumed. Venezuela accounted for most of the seventh barrel; with
small contributions from British Persia and the Soviet Caucasus.
Germany’s oil sources had been inadequate to power its civilian economy;
and its failure to capture and bring online the Caucasus oil in 1942 is the primary reason why it lost the war.
The war-torn economies which emerged from
the ashes of war in 1945, then, were almost entirely dependent upon oil
from the USA. And this allowed an internal American oil cartel – the
Texas Railroad Commission – to extend its price fixing to the entire
world. So long as US oil made up a large part of global oil production,
and so long as US oil fields had excess capacity, the TRC could
regulate the global oil price. If prices began to rise too high, the
TRC would order companies to produce more oil. If prices sank too low,
the TRC would order production cuts. As a result, throughout the boom
years 1953 to 1973, the world oil price remained stable at around $25
per barrel (at today’s prices).
When the US conventional oil
fields peaked in 1970, the TRC lost its ability to prevent prices from
rising by expanding production. This was a boon for Middle East and
North African producers whose production costs were higher than those in
the USA. And although the first – 1973 – oil shock was in part a
response to western support for Israel in the Arab-Israeli war, sooner
or later the newly empowered OPEC was going to cut supply to drive up
prices.
It is an irony that a capitalist system
which claims to be built upon competition and free markets has proved
stable only in those periods when its source of value – energy – has
been controlled by cartels. Once OPEC-led price stability was regained
in the mid-1980s, the stage was set for the global debt-boom of the
1990s and early 2000s. And with the fall of the Soviet Union and the
apparent conversion of China to state capitalism, for a brief moment the
world seemed content.
Peak oil had not, though, gone away; it
had merely been postponed. Britain discovered this the hard way after
its North Sea deposits – which had once produced more oil than Kuwait –
peaked in 1999. By 2005 – the year global conventional oil
extraction peaked – Britain had become a net importer of oil and gas.
Today, Britain’s North Sea deposits produce 60 percent less oil than in
1999; and the projected price of the remaining oil is not enough to
cover the decommissioning costs.
By 2005 though, had we but known it at
the time, we had bigger problems to deal with. The experience of the
oil shocks of the 1970s convinced many peak oilers that once the peak of
global oil extraction had been reached, prices would rise remorselessly
as a consequence of supply and demand imbalance. This, indeed, is what
appeared to happen after the 2005 peak was reached:
By 2012, Michael Kumhof and Dirk V Muir
from the International Monetary Fund were anticipating global oil
prices of more than $200 per barrel by 2020. But that isn’t what
happened. Instead, from 2014 the oil price slumped and has been on a
steadily downward trend ever since. The reason is because there is more
to peak oil than geology and engineering.
Indeed, many peak oilers make the same
mistake as economists in treating oil – and energy in general – as being
just another relatively low-cost factor of production. The wage bill,
for example, is always far higher than the energy costs of running a
business. But as economist Steve Keen explains; “capital without energy
is a statue, labour without energy is a corpse.” Or as engineering
professor Jean-Marc Jancovici explains:
“energy is what quantifies change.” Nothing happens in the world
without energy. And when the cost of the world’s biggest primary energy
source – oil – begins to spike upward, the impacts are felt in every
area of our lives.
The story of the 2008 crash is usually
told in financial terms; and is used to blame the victims. The cause of
the crisis, we are told, was so-called sub-prime borrowers taking on
mortgages that they couldn’t possibly pay back. Except, of course,
prior to 2008 they had been paying them back. So what happened
to change their circumstances so that they could no longer repay
debts? The answer is interest rate rises. The banks had based their
lending on the assumption that the economy was stable; that inflation
would grow at around two percent; and that interest rates would remain
relatively low. With house prices supposedly guaranteed to keep rising,
and having securitised the risks,
banks – with the assistance of governments – could extend home
ownership to the masses. But from 2006, central banks had been raising
interest rates; tipping borrowers into default.
Why had the central banks been raising
interest rates? Because from 2005, inflation began to break out of the 1
to 3 percent band that they were charged with maintaining. According
to all of the textbooks they had been brought up on, the central bankers
had been taught that the way to bring inflation back under control was
to raise interest rates. But they – and the economics textbooks – were
wrong. What they believed to be inflation – too much currency chasing
too few goods – was actually an economy adjusting to its first
supply-side shock since the 1970s.
Yesterday morning I read back to back dissertations on the Green Economy and the Green New Deal from the Brookings (neoliberal fascist) and Open Democracy (center left) respectively. These got me thinking about the overarching objectives of the entire Great Reset Operation, the tools it has employed over the past three years for human livestock management, and, its endlessly escalating opposition to MAGA or Brexit nationalism.
In the area of endless escalation, the abrupt impoverishment of tens of millions via unnecessary quarantines and lockdowns, billowing political and interpersonal polarization fast approaching civil war/race war, and the use of engineered biological agents (which presumably can be ratcheted up to increasing levels of contagiousness and lethality) - all point toward an endgame that is far more drastic than anything currently countenanced in the mainstream narrative. We're not talking here about a "new normal", instead, we're talking about mass starvation, everyone against everyone ultraviolence, and when austerity gets REALLY severe, cannibalism.
Central Banks are fighting a battle they will lose. Conventional (easy cheap oil) peaked in 2005. To compensate for that we smash rocks and suck out the oil --- we steam oil out of sand - and we drill miles beneath the ocean for oil. The EROEI from those extractive methods is very low. At the moment, we still have enough high energy return oil to subsidize those methods so
civilization continues. (with greatly reduced travel, disrupted supply chains, and massive amounts of stimulus to help cope with the low EROEI oil mix.
The global
economy does NOT like low energy return oil because it leaves less to
run the world. In 2019 shale oil was peaking so the stop-gap, make-work party was ending. At that time, political elites began handwaving toward Universal Basic Income and Modern Monetary Theory to prep us for what we are experiencing now. They trotted out pasty and uncharismatic Greta Thunberg to exhort us about shutting down the planet.
Meanwhile and in parallel we get the MAGA man and his competing exhortations to take America back to 1954 along every politically expedient metric. At that point, in his "greatest economy ever" spiel, he could point to a periodic glut and claim 'we are
swimming in oil'. A glut does not mean we have found more oil - it
simply means producers are pumping their reserves out faster. They
usually do this when prices are low as they need
the cash flow to pay the bills so they need to push our more volume. The truth is that there is very little new oil being
found. What would you do if you were on your last tank of gas? Of
course you would ration it.
Enter Covid and the Great Reset. Covid was created in a lab to provide cover for the collapsing energy availability "new normal". Covid has provided mimetic cover under authority of science for central banks to roll out MMT UBI Helicopter
Money. In addition, we are being groomed to accept
lockdowns. Anyone who resists is met with a big fine, arrest and in
some countries beatings. Your neighbour will be told by the
authorities to rat on you going forward. Why? Because when the Central Banks and their puppet politicians lose control of this situation they will enact martial
law -- a total lockdown. (the police state pincer movement)
For a time there may be food delivery pacification to those in the most extreme condition, but like stimulus checks and the MMT UBI, these will stop in fairly short order too. Politicians will promise 'the deliveries will resume in a couple of
days'. Like good sheep, you will trust these sock puppet rascals and wait... and wait...
and wait... and when you realize there is
no food coming you will be too weak and exhausted to do anything. In any event there will be nothing you can do - there will be no food
because the system has collapsed.
This will be for your own good. Resisting is futile. Nobody wants
extreme violence and cannibalism. You and your family will lie down
and wait to die from starvation.
A Foundation of Joy
-
Two years and I've lost count of how many times my eye has been operated
on, either beating the fuck out of the tumor, or reattaching that slippery
eel ...
April Three
-
4/3
43
When 1 = A and 26 = Z
March = 43
What day?
4 to the power of 3 is 64
64th day is March 5
My birthday
March also has 5 letters.
4 x 3 = 12
...
Return of the Magi
-
Lately, the Holy Spirit is in the air. Emotional energy is swirling out of
the earth.I can feel it bubbling up, effervescing and evaporating around
us, s...
New Travels
-
Haven’t published on the Blog in quite a while. I at least part have been
immersed in the area of writing books. My focus is on Science Fiction an
Historic...
Covid-19 Preys Upon The Elderly And The Obese
-
sciencemag | This spring, after days of flulike symptoms and fever, a man
arrived at the emergency room at the University of Vermont Medical Center.
He ...