strategic-culture | With the specter of a New Great Depression hovering over most of the
planet, realpolitik perspectives for a radical change of the political
economy framework we live in are not exactly encouraging.
Western ruling elites will be deploying myriad tactics to perpetuate
the passivity of populations barely emerging from de facto house arrest,
including a massive disciplinary – in a Foucault sense – drive by
states and business/finance circles.
In his latest book, La Desaparicion de los Rituales,
Byung-Chul Han shows how total communication, especially in a time of
pandemic, now coincides with total vigilance: “Domination impersonates
freedom. Big Data generates a domineering knowledge that allows the
possibility of intervening in the human psyche, and manipulating it.
Considering it this way, the data-ist imperative of transparency is not a
continuation of the Enlightenment, but its ending.”
This revamping of Foucault’s Discipline and Punish coincides with
reports about the demise of the neoliberal era being vastly overstated.
Instead of a simplistic plunge into populist nationalism, what is on the
horizon points mostly to a Neoliberalism Restoration
– massively spun as a novelty, and incorporating some Keynesian
elements: after all, in the post-Lockdown era, to “save” the markets and
private initiative the state must not only intervene but also
facilitate a possible ecological transition.
The bottom line: we may be facing a mere cosmetic approach, in which
the deep structural crisis of zombie capitalism – barely moving under
unpopular “reforms” and infinite debt – still is not addressed.
Meanwhile, what is going to happen to assorted fascisms? Eric Hobsbawm showed us in Age of Extremes how the key to the fascist right was always mass mobilization: “Fascists were the revolutionaries of the counter-revolution”.
We may be heading further than mere, crude neofascism. Call it Hybrid
Neofascism. Their political stars bow to global market imperatives
while switching political competition to the cultural arena.
That’s what true “illiberalism” is all about: the mix between
neoliberalism – unrestricted capital mobility, Central Bank diktats –
and political authoritarianism. Here’s where we find Trump, Modi and
Bolsonaro.
The rich oligarch
leader of Bolivia's right-wing coup, Luis Fernando Camacho, was
the leader of an explicitly fascist paramilitary
group. Here are some clips from a promotional
historical documentary it published:https://t.co/gFMyfjsi2ppic.twitter.com/XXNQfhD7ii
thegrayzone | Bolivian coup leader Luis Fernando Camacho is a
far-right multi-millionaire who arose from fascist
movements in the Santa Cruz region, where the US has
encouraged separatism. He has courted support from
Colombia, Brazil, and the Venezuelan opposition.
When Luis Fernando
Camacho stormed into Bolivia’s abandoned
presidential palace in the hours after President Evo
Morales’s sudden November 10 resignation, he
revealed to the world a side of the country that
stood at stark odds with the plurinational spirit
its deposed socialist and Indigenous leader had put
forward.
With a Bible in
one hand and a national flag in the other, Camacho
bowed his head in prayer above the presidential
seal, fulfilling his vow to purge his country’s
Native heritage from government and “return God to
the burned palace.”
“Pachamama will
never return to the palace,” he said, referring to
the Andean Mother Earth spirit. “Bolivia belongs to
Christ.”
energy.gov | NNSA and the National Aeronautics and
Space Administration (NASA) joined forces to address a unique challenge:
developing a power source able to support deep space travel and outlast
existing fuel sources. NNSA came through with the technical expertise required to achieve this goal.
“The
relationship between NNSA and NASA is a ‘win-win’ partnership,” said
Patrick Cahalane, NNSA’s Principal Deputy Associate Administrator for
Safety, Infrastructure and Operations. “NASA gets a prototype
demonstration for a kilowatt-range fission power source, and NNSA gets a
benchmark-quality experiment that provides new nuclear data in support
of our Nuclear Criticality Safety Program.”
The experiment, nicknamed KRUSTY (Kilowatt Reactor Using Stirling TechnologY), was part of NASA’s larger Kilopower project. KRUSTY was designed to test a prototype fission reactor coupled to a Stirling engine. Stirling technology is efficient, doesn’t require significant maintenance, and does not degrade in performance over time.
Researchers
designed and performed initial testing of the KRUSTY reactor design
using a surrogate, or non-fissile, reactor core and resistive heating
elements. Experts from NNSA’s Y-12 National Security Complex manufactured the uranium reactor core, which was delivered to the NCERC in the fall of 2017.
scmp | Having obtained a dual bachelor’s degree from a US university and
climbed to a senior software engineer’s position within two and a half
years of working for an American company, Owen Wang was forced to
dramatically scale back his salary expectations when he decided to come
home to China.
Currently working in Kansas City – where the
average annual senior software engineer’s salary is US$100,000,
according to glassdoor.com – the best offer from a Chinese firm he has
received so far is a package from a Shenzhen-based start-up worth around
240,000 yuan (US$35,250).
But while he had expected salaries in the
southern Chinese city to be lower than those on offer in the US – the
per capita income in Kansas City is over four times more than the
average in Shenzhen – he had been hoping someone would offer him a pay
packet worth around 500,000 yuan a year.
“We’re still negotiating. I guess I will finally
accept a compromise if there’s no better choice, but the quality of my
life will drop significantly,” said the 27-year-old.
Wang’s plan to return home is not motivated
purely by financial considerations – he worries that tighter US
immigration policies will make it harder for him to stay and his parents
have been hoping that he will be able to come home and visit them more
often – but his disappointment is mirrored by many of the hundreds of
thousands of Chinese who return home from studying and working overseas
every year.
A recent survey by a Beijing-based think tank of
more than 2,000 Chinese returnees found that about 80 per cent said
their salaries were lower than expected, with around 70 per cent saying
what they were doing did not match their experience and skills.
Doug: Of course “exploit” is a loaded word; it
implies one-sided, unbalanced dealings, and unfair business—although the
word “fair” also has lots of baggage, and politically charged meanings.
But, yes, they’re definitely exploiting Africa. We’re seeing a
veritable re-colonization of Africa. Every time I visit Africa I see
more and more Chinese. It doesn’t matter which country; they’re
everywhere.
It’s important to remember that Africa doesn’t produce anything
besides raw materials. There’s close to zero manufacturing, like 1% of
the world’s total, in sub-Saharan Africa. And almost all of that is in
South Africa. The little there is, is only produced with the help
foreigners—Europeans, but increasingly the Chinese.
The Chinese basically see Africans as no more than a cheap labor
source. That’s at best. Other than that, they’re viewed as a complete
nuisance. Basically an obstacle, a cost, standing in the way of
efficient use of the continent itself.
What do the Chinese people think of Africans? They don’t hold them in
high regard. Of course, you’ve got to remember that China has viewed
itself as the center of the world since Day One. They see all non-Han
peoples as barbarians, as inferiors. That was absolutely true when the
British sent an ambassador, Macartney, to open relations at the very end
of the 18th C. He was treated with borderline
contempt—pretty much the way Europeans and Americans have treated
primitive peoples since the days of Columbus. It’s actually the normal
human attitude, when an advanced culture encounters a backward culture.
The Chinese see their culture as superior to even that of the West, and
believe—probably correctly—that they’ll soon be economically and
technologically superior as well.
Africa doesn’t even enter the equation. The continent has no
civilization, no economy, no technology, no military power. The famed
Zimbabwe ruins are just some semi-finished rocks piled on one
another—and they’re considered iconic. The Chinese see the place the way
the Spanish saw Mexico and Peru in the 16th C. Of course they won’t say that in public. In fact it’s very non-PC for anyone to make that observation…
Nonetheless, Africa is going to be the epicenter of what’s happening
in the world for years to come. It’s gone from being just an empty space
on the map in the 19th C, to a bunch of backwater colonies in the 20th
C, to a bunch of failed states that people are only vaguely aware of
today. Soon, however, it will be frontpage news. And this is both
because Chinese are moving to Africa in record numbers and Africans are
leaving as fast as they can.
Many Africans are now trying to make their way to Europe. Every year
scores of thousands of them—all young men by the way—cross the
Mediterranean on rafts. When they arrive in Europe, they somehow survive
by selling bobbles on the street, dealing dope, or stealing. And
figuring out how to game the welfare system. Now, I realize this doesn’t
sound very promising. But that’s the way things are headed. It’s a
growing trend.
eurasiareview | Indigenous Peoples have ownership, use and management rights over at
least a quarter of the world’s land surface according to a new study
published this week in the journal Nature Sustainability.
The
38 million square kilometers (14.6 million square miles) are spread
across 87 countries or politically distinct areas and overlap with about
40 percent of all terrestrial protected areas.
The results of the
study provides strong evidence that recognizing the rights of
Indigenous Peoples to their traditional lands and waters is not only an
ethical obligation it is essential to meeting local and global
conservation goals. The authors say that more collaborative partnerships
between Indigenous Peoples and governments would yield significant
benefits for conservation of ecologically valuable landscapes,
ecosystems, and genetic diversity for future generations.
“Understanding
the extent of lands over which Indigenous Peoples retain traditional
connection is critical for several conservation and climate agreements,”
said Professor Stephen Garnett from Charles Darwin University in
Australia who led the international consortium that developed the maps.
“Not until we pulled together the best available published information
on Indigenous lands did we really appreciate the extraordinary scale of
Indigenous Peoples’ ongoing influence,” he said.
There are at
least 370 million people who define themselves as Indigenous, are
descended from populations who inhabited a country before the time of
conquest or colonization, and who retain at least some of their own
social, economic, cultural and political practices. The proportion of
countries with indigenous people is highest in Africa and lowest in
Europe-West Asia.
sciencefriday |Giant jellyfish and mussels. Pallid
shrimp, fish, and sea cucumbers. Never-before-seen octopus species. All
these and more dwell in the deep sea, 200 meters (over 650 feet) and
deeper beneath the ocean surface. It’s the largest habitat on Earth, but
it’s also one of the least understood.
As mining companies eye the mineral
resources of the deep sea—from oil and gas, to metal deposits—marine
biologists like London’s Natural History Museum’s Diva Amon
are working to discover and describe as much of the deep sea as they
can. Amon has been on dozens of expeditions to sea, where she’s helped
characterize ecosystems and discover new species all over the world. And
she says we still don’t know enough about deep sea ecology to know how
to protect these species, the ones we’ve found and the ones we haven’t
yet, from mining.
But accessing the deep ocean is
expensive; it can cost anywhere from $50,000 to $100,000 a day to run a
research ship. So roboticists and artificial intelligence designers are
developing underwater drones to map and sniff out the secrets of the
deep with the help of sophisticated chemical sensors. These robotic
explorers could someday hunt down sunken ships or planes, hydrothermal
vents, and biological spectacles such as rare species or a whale fall,
at a cost significantly cheaper than today. Nine teams of roboticists
designing these underwater crafts are now in a race to win the Shell Ocean Discovery XPRIZE.
In this segment, Amon and XPRIZE’s
Jyotika Virmani join Ira to talk about the future of deep ocean
exploration—and what we might find there. And Martin Brooke, team leader
of Blue Devil Ocean Engineering at Duke University, will discuss his
team’s plan for mapping the deep ocean: aerial drones that drop
sonar-sounding pods into the seas, then reel them up and move them to
the next target.
medium | A
US Army document concedes the real interests driving US military
strategy toward Russia: dominating oil pipeline routes, accessing the
vast natural resources of Central Asia, and enforcing the expansion of
American capitalism worldwide.
The
Russians are coming. They hacked our elections. They are lurking behind
numerous alternative political movements and news outlets. Such is the
overwhelming chorus from traditional reporting on Russia, which sees the
United States as being under threat from fanatical Russian
expansionism — expansionism which has gone so far as to interfere
dramatically in the 2016 Presidential elections.
Russia
is certainly an authoritarian regime with its own regional imperial
ambitions. President Vladimir Putin and his cronies are responsible for
massive deaths and human rights violations against populations at home
and abroad (the latter in war theaters like Syria and elsewhere). Putin
has strengthened a system of oligarchical state-dominated predatory
capitalism which has widened extreme inequality
and concentrated elite wealth. And we will no doubt learn more about
what shenanigans Russia did, or did not, get up to in relation to US
elections.
For the
most part, these are not especially dangerous things to report on from
the comfort of the West. Somewhat lacking from conventional reporting,
on the other hand, is serious reflection on whether US policies toward Russia have contributed directly to the deterioration of US-Russia relations.
While
the bulk of the Western pundit class are busy bravely obsessing over
the innumerable evils of Putin, it turns out that the upper echelons of
the US military are asking some uncomfortable questions about how we got
to where we are.
A study
by the US Army’s Command and General Staff College Press of the
Combined Arms Center at Fort Leavenworth reveals that US strategy toward
Russia has been heavily motivated by the goal of dominating Central
Asian oil and gas resources, and associated pipeline routes.
The remarkable document,
prepared by the US Army’s Culture, Regional Expertise and Language
Management Office (CRELMO), concedes that expansionist NATO policies
played a key role in provoking Russian militarism. It also contemplates
how current US and Russian antagonisms could spark a global nuclear
conflict between the two superpowers.
medium | A new scientific study
led by the China University of Petroleum in Beijing, funded by the
Chinese government, concludes that China is about to experience a peak
in its total oil production as early as next year.
Without
finding an alternative source of “new abundant energy resources”, the
study warns, the 2018 peak in China’s combined conventional and
unconventional oil will undermine continuing economic growth and
“challenge the sustainable development of Chinese society.”
This
also has major implications for the prospect of a 2018 oil squeeze — as
China scales its domestic oil peak, rising demand will impact world oil
markets in a way most forecasters aren’t anticipating, contributing to a
potential supply squeeze. That could happen in 2018 proper, or in the
early years that follow.
There
are various scenarios that follow from here — China could: shift to
reducing its massive demand for energy, a tall order in itself given
population growth projections and rising consumption; accelerate a
renewable energy transition; or militarise the South China Sea for more
deepwater oil and gas.
Right
now, China appears to be incoherently pursuing all three strategies,
with varying rates of success. But one thing is clear — China’s
decisions on how it addresses its coming post-peak future will impact
regional and global political and energy security for the foreseeable
future.
Fossil fuelled-growth
The study was published on 19 September by Springer’s peer-reviewed Petroleum Science
journal, which is supported by China’s three major oil corporations,
the China National Petroleum Corporation (CNPC), China Petroleum
Corporation (Sinopec), and China National Offshore Oil Corporation
(CNOOC).
Since
1978, China has experienced an average annual economic growth rate of
9.8%, and is now the world’s second largest economy after the United
States.
The new study points out, however, that this economic growth has been enabled by “high energy consumption.”
In
the same period of meteoric economic growth, China’s total energy
consumption has grown on average by 5.8% annually, mostly from fossil
fuels. In 2014, oil, gas and coal accounted for fully 90% of China’s
total energy consumption, with the remainder supplied from renewable
energy sources.
After
2018, however, China’s oil production is predicted to begin declining,
and the widening supply-demand gap could endanger both China’s energy
security and continued economic growth.
theautomaticearth | Trying to figure out what on earth is happening in the Middle East
appears to have gotten a lot harder. Perhaps (because) it’s become more
dangerous too. There are so many players, and connections between
players, involved now that even making one of those schematic
representations would never get it right. Too many unknown unknowns.
A short and incomplete list of the actors: Sunni, Shiite, Saudi
Arabia, US, Russia, Turkey, ISIS, Syria, Iran, Iraq, Libya, Kurds,
Lebanon, Hezbollah, Hamas, Qatar, Israel, United Arab Emirates (UAE),
Houthis, perhaps even Chechnya, Afghanistan, Pakistan. I know I know,
add your favorites. So what have we got, or what do we know we’ve got?
We seem to have the US lining up with Israel, the UAE and Saudi Arabia
against Russia, Iran, Syria, Hezbollah. Broadly. But that’s just a -pun
intended- crude start.
Putin has been getting closer to the Saudis because of the OPEC
production cuts, trying to jack up the price of oil. Which ironically
has now been achieved on the heels of the arrests of 11 princes and
scores of other wealthy and powerful in the kingdom. But Putin also
recently signed a $30 billion oil -infrastructure- deal with Iran. And
he’s been cuddling up to Israel as well.
In fact, Putin may well be the most powerful force in the Middle East
today. Well played?! He prevented the demise of Assad in Syria, which
however you look at it at least saved the country from becoming another
Iraq and Libya style failed state. If there’s one thing you can say
about the Middle East/North Africa it’s that the US succeeded in
creating chaos there to such an extent that it has zero control left
over any of it. Well played?!
One thing seems obvious: the House of Saud needs money. The cash
flowing out to the princes is simply not available anymore. The oil
price is a major factor in that. Miraculously, the weekend crackdown on
dozens of princes et al, managed to do what all the OPEC meetings could
not for the price of oil: push it up. But the shrinkage of foreign
reserves shows a long term problem, not some momentary blip
Another sign that money has become a real problem in Riyadh is the
ever-postponed IPO of Saudi Aramco, the flagship oil company supposedly
worth $2 trillion. Trump this week called on the Saudi’s to list it in
New York, but despite the upsurge in oil prices you still have to wonder
which part of that $2 trillion is real, and which is just fantasy.
But yeah, I know, there’s a million different stocks you can ask the
same question about. Then again, seeing the wealth of some of the
kingdom’s richest parties confiscated overnight can’t be a buy buy buy
signal, can it? Looks like the IPO delay tells us something.
And then you have the 15,000 princes and princesses who all live off
of the Kingdom’s supposed riches (‘only 2,000’ profit directly). All of
them live in -relative- wealth. Some more than others, but there’s no
hunger in the royal family. Thing is, overall population growth outdoes
even that in the royal family. Which means, since the country produces
nothing except for oil, that there are 1000s upon 1000s of young people
with nothing to do but spend money that’s no longer there. Cue mayhem.
energyskeptic | In the past several years, the gap between demand and supply, once
considerable, has steadily narrowed, and today is almost negligible. The
consequences of an actual shortfall of supply would be immense. If
consumption begins to exceed production by even a small amount, the
price of a barrel of oil could soar to triple-digit levels. This, in
turn, could bring on a global recession, a result of exorbitant prices
for transport fuels and for products that rely on petrochemicals — which
is to say, almost every product on the market.
The impact on the American way of life would be profound: cars
cannot be propelled by roof-borne windmills. The suburban and exurban
lifestyles, hinged to two-car families and constant trips to work,
school and Wal-Mart, might become unaffordable or, if gas rationing is
imposed, impossible. Carpools would be the least imposing of many inconveniences; the cost of home heating would soar — assuming, of course, that climate-controlled habitats do not become just a fond memory.
But will such a situation really come to pass? That depends on Saudi
Arabia. To know the answer, you need to know whether the Saudis, who
possess 22 percent of the world’s oil reserves, can increase their
country’s output beyond its current limit of 10.5 million barrels a day,
and even beyond the 12.5-million-barrel target it has set for 2009.
(World consumption is about 84 million barrels a day.) Saudi
Arabia is the sole oil superpower. No other producer possesses reserves
close to its 263 billion barrels, which is almost twice as much as the
runner-up, Iran, with 133 billion barrels.
But the truth about Saudi oil is hard to figure out. Oil reservoirs
cannot be inventoried like wood in a wilderness: the oil is underground,
unseen by geologists and engineers, who can, at best, make highly
educated guesses about how much is underfoot and how much can be
extracted in the future. And there is a further obstacle: the Saudis
will not let outsiders audit their confidential data on reserves and
production. Oil is an industry in which not only is the product hidden
from sight but so is reliable information about it. And because we do
not know when a supply-demand shortfall might arrive, we do not know
when to begin preparing for it, so as to soften its impact; the economic
blow may come as a sledgehammer from the darkness.
For 31 years, Matthew Simmons has prospered as the head of his own
firm, Simmons & Company International, which advises energy
companies on mergers and acquisitions. A member of the Council on
Foreign Relations, a graduate of the Harvard Business School and an
unpaid adviser on energy policy to the 2000 presidential campaign of
George W. Bush, he would be a card-carrying member of the global oil
nomenclatura, if cards were issued for such things. Yet he is one of the
principal reasons the oil world is beginning to ask hard questions of
itself.
Two years ago, Simmons went to Saudi Arabia on a government tour for
business executives. The group was presented with the usual dog-and-pony
show, but instead of being impressed, as most visitors tend to be, with
the size and expertise of the Saudi oil industry, Simmons became
perplexed. As he recalls in his somewhat heretical new book, ”Twilight
in the Desert: The Coming Saudi Oil Shock and the World Economy,” a
senior manager at Aramco told the visitors that ”fuzzy logic” would be
used to estimate the amount of oil that could be recovered. Simmons had
never heard of fuzzy logic. What could be fuzzy about an oil reservoir?
He suspected that Aramco, despite its promises of endless supplies,
might in fact not know how much oil remained to be recovered.
Simmons returned home with an itch to scratch. Saudi Arabia was one
of the charter members of OPEC, founded in 1960 in Baghdad to coordinate
the policies of oil producers. Like every OPEC country, Saudi Arabia
provides only general numbers about its output and reserves; it does not
release details about how much oil is extracted from each reservoir and
what methods are used to extract that oil, and it does not permit
audits by outsiders. The condition of Saudi fields, and those of other
OPEC nations, is a closely guarded secret. That’s largely because OPEC
quotas, which were first imposed in 1983 to limit the output of member
countries, were based on overall reserves; the higher an OPEC member’s
reserves, the higher its quota. It is widely believed that most,
if not all, OPEC members exaggerated the sizes of their reserves in
order to have the largest possible quota — and thus the largest possible
revenue stream.
bloomberg | Prince Mohammed seems to be playing the equally ruthless roles of
autocrat and reformer. The millennial has been outspoken about his bold
plans to modernize Saudi society and wean the kingdom from fossil fuel.
Now, Prince Mohammed has locked up globe-trotting tycoons and other
dynastic rivals, sending shock waves across the desert and around the
world. Since Saudi Arabia’s founding in 1932 by his grandfather,
Abdulaziz Al Saud, successive kings have sought consensus among the
family’s thousands of princes, balancing religious, princely, and tribal
factions to maintain stability in the world’s largest oil supplier.
Decisions were made at a glacial pace, often capped with generous
payouts for anyone left unhappy. Prince Mohammed has smashed that
conservative status quo in an act, he no doubt believes, of creative
destruction.
This is a man of dead-certain belief in himself, who told this magazine in a long, autobiographical interview
in April 2016 that his childhood experiences among princes and
potentates were more valuable and formative than Steve Jobs’s, Mark
Zuckerberg’s, and Bill Gates’s. So, he wondered aloud, “if I work
according to their methods, what will I create?” Now we know his
disruptive potential.
The prince’s unprecedented arrest of a who’s who of Saudi society
is a first stab at fulfilling his vow to hold the corrupt accountable.
“I confirm to you, no one will survive in a corruption case—whoever he
is, even if he’s a prince or a minister,” Prince Mohammed said in a
televised interview in May. The vow has now become a Twitter sensation
among Saudis under the age of 30, who make up 70 percent of the
population, the demographic bulge the prince has made his base. They’re
still plenty skeptical of Prince Mohammed and his father the king, who
recently visited Moscow with 1,500 retainers, his own carpets, and a
golden escalator for his Boeing 747.
No
one imagined the crown prince would go so far. The takedown, set up by
his father, King Salman, through a new anticorruption commission that
Prince Mohammed chairs, rounded up his most visible potential adversary,
Prince Miteb bin Abdullah. A favored son of the late King Abdullah, who
died in 2015, Miteb, 65, commanded the Saudi National Guard, which,
until his arrest, had been the last military branch not under Prince
Mohammed’s control.
antiwar | But Patrick Meehan, chairman of the US Congressional committee that
drew up the report, said “While I recognize there is little evidence at
this moment to suggest Boko Haram is planning attacks against the [US]
homeland, lack of evidence does not mean it cannot happen.”
Washington’s interest in Africa goes back at least to 2007, when the
Pentagon’s AFRICOM was formed, long before rebels in Libya or militants
in Mali were a threats to exaggerate.
The dominant way of thinking in Washington is that the US should be
involved in every corner of the planet, and the pressure to always “do
something” is intense.
But as Micah Zenko, a senior fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations recently commented
with regards to the intervention in Mali, “Some things that happen on
the other 94% of the earth that isn’t the US, has nothing to do with the
US, nor requires a US response.”
Paul Chefurka's grim assessment of what's in store for Africa. Please read and bookmark this paper.
There is a darkness moving on the face of the land. We catch glimpses of it in newscasts from far-off places that few of us have ever seen. We hear hints of it on the radio, read snippets about it in newspapers and magazines. The stories are always fragmentary, lacking context or connection. They speak of things like inflation in Zimbabwe, war in Chad, electricity problems in Johannesburg, famine in Malawi, pipeline fires in Nigeria, political violence in Kenya, cholera in Congo. Each snapshot of grief heaves briefly into view, then fades back into obscurity. With every fresh story we are left asking ourselves, "Is there something bigger going on here, some unseen thread connecting these dots? Or is this just more of the same from a continent that has known more than its share of misery?"
This paper is my attempt to connect those dots, to tease some order out of the chaos of the news reports. I will use some very simple numerical techniques to fill in the missing lines, and in the end a picture will emerge. I can tell you in advance that the picture is fearsome beyond imagining, and you may well be tempted to avert your gaze. I would advise you instead to screw up your courage and take a good look. It is crucial to our future as a civilized race.
I expect the collapse to turn Africa into the next arena for a quick game of "Disaster Capitalism." Large trans-national entities will make offers of "significant assistance" to particular countries in return for untrammeled access to their resource base. The vultures will be lining the banks of the Zambezi waiting for the feast, no doubt about it.
"I know there's rumors in Ghana `All Bush is coming to do is try to convince you to put a big military base here,' Bush said at a news conference with Kufuor. "That's baloney. As they say in Texas, that's bull."
Instead, he said the new command — unique to the Pentagon's structure — was aimed at more effectively reorganizing U.S. military efforts in Africa to strengthen African nations' peacekeeping, trafficking and anti-terror efforts.
"The whole purpose of Africom is to help African leaders deal with African problems," Bush said.
Bush sought to dispel the notion about militarization of Africa even before giving reporters a chance to ask him about it. Kufuour said he was satisfied with Bush's explanation, and thanked him for announcing it "so that the relationship between us and the United States will grow stronger."
For now, the administration has decided to continue operating Africom out of existing U.S. bases on the continent with a headquarters in Stuttgart, Germany. War-wrecked Liberia is the only African nation that has publicly offered to host a headquarters. Bush said before the trip that "if" a headquarters for Africom is ever established on the continent, he would "seriously consider" Liberia as the host.
local10 |President Donald Trump told U.S. Army Sgt. La David Johnson's
widow Tuesday that "he knew what he signed up for ... but when it
happens, it hurts anyway," when he died serving in northwestern Africa,
according to U.S. Rep. Frederica Wilson, D-Florida.
"Yeah, he said that," Wilson said. "So insensitive. He should have not have said that. He shouldn't have said it."
The president called about 4:45 p.m. and spoke to Johnson's pregnant
widow, Myeshia Johnson, for about five minutes. She is a mother to
Johnson's surviving 2-year-old son and 6-year-old daughter. The
conversation happened before Johnson's remains arrived at Miami
International Airport on a commercial Delta Airlines flight.
"The president's conversations with the
families of American heroes who have made the ultimate sacrifice are
private," a top advisor later told Local 10 News.
Wilson watched as the widow,
who is expecting their third baby in January, leaned over the U.S. flag
that was draping Johnson's casket. Her pregnant belly was shaking
against the casket as she sobbed uncontrollably. Their daughter stood
next to her stoically. Their toddler waited in the arms of a relative.
There was silence.
Local politicians, police officers and
firefighters lined up to honor Johnson for his service and for the
efforts and discipline that got the former Walmart employee to defy all
odds and become a 25-year-old member of the 3rd Special Forces Group at
Fort Bragg, North Carolina.
Johnson, who participated in a mentorship
program Wilson founded in 1993, died during a mission fighting alongside
Green Berets. Islamic militants ambushed them on Oct. 4
with rocket-propelled grenades and machine guns. The team reportedly didn't have overhead armed air cover and was in unarmored pickup trucks. Reuters reported the lack of planning upset the French.
Trump didn't discuss any of the details of
the ambush or say that the Pentagon was conducting an investigation.
Instead, he focused on questions about whether or not he had offered his
condolences to the families of the fallen.
reuters | Venezuela’s unraveling socialist government is
increasingly turning to ally Russia for the cash and credit it needs to
survive – and offering prized state-owned oil assets in return, sources
familiar with the negotiations told Reuters.
As
Caracas struggles to contain an economic meltdown and violent street
protests, Moscow is using its position as Venezuela’s lender of last
resort to gain more control over the OPEC nation’s crude reserves, the
largest in the world.
Venezuela's state-owned
oil firm, Petroleos de Venezuela (PDVSA), has been secretly negotiating
since at least early this year with Russia's biggest state-owned oil
company, Rosneft (ROSN.MM)
- offering ownership interests in up to nine of Venezuela's most
productive petroleum projects, according to a top Venezuelan government
official and two industry sources familiar with the talks.
Moscow
has substantial leverage in the negotiations: Cash from Russia and
Rosneft has been crucial in helping the financially strapped government
of Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro avoid a sovereign debt default or
a political coup.
Rosneft delivered
Venezuela’s state-owned firm more than $1 billion in April alone in
exchange for a promise of oil shipments later. On at least two
occasions, the Venezuelan government has used Russian cash to avoid
imminent defaults on payments to bondholders, a high-level PDVSA
official told Reuters.
Rosneft has also
positioned itself as a middleman in sales of Venezuelan oil to customers
worldwide. Much of it ends up at refineries in the United States –
despite U.S. sanctions against Russia – because it is sold through
intermediaries such as oil trading firms, according to internal PDVSA
trade reports seen by Reuters and a source at the firm.
PDVSA and the government of Venezuela did not respond to requests for comment.
The
Russian government declined to comment and referred questions to the
foreign ministry and the ministries of finance and defense, which did
not respond to questions from Reuters. Rosneft declined to comment.
lewrockwell |QUESTION: Mr. Armstrong I live in Israel and today I
listened to your podcast with Macrovoices. At some point you mentioned
that there is more oil in Golan heights than in Saudi Arabia -and this
oil belongs to genie energy. Is it true? How can it be that nobody knew
nothing about this in Israel? Are you sure 100 % about this information?
I will be happy to know more about this.
ANSWER: Yes. This is one of the best kept secrets.
You can imagine that if this went into production, then the disputed
Syrian land issue occupied by Israel would come to the forefront. This
is why it gets no play but this is one reason Obama was working to
overthrow the Syrian government. They would not have political people on
the Strategic Advisory Board if they did not need political strings
pulled.
Politically, you have the Pipe Line from Qatar being
one major issue that was to compete with Russia in selling gas to
Europe, which is why Putin is involved. He is not involved in Egypt,
Israel, or even Afghanistan. This is the reason why Putin has an
interest in Syria and the mainstream media of course championed Obama
claiming he was defending children. Then we have Genie Oil and strategic
oil reserves within occupied Syria. Just look at the people who are are
heavy hitters on the Strategic Advisory Board of Genie Oil! Not bad for a company nobody has heard of and the glaring issue is why do you need heavy hitters like this just to pump oil? Location! Location! Location! The
mainstream media is not going to report on this issue. They even
have Rupert Murdoch on their Strategic Advisory Board. This is hush hush
in the mainstream media.
medium | In her speech to the 2016 Conservative Party conference, British Prime Minister Theresa May pointedly said:
“…if
you believe you’re a citizen of the world, you’re a citizen of nowhere.
You don’t understand what the very word ‘citizenship’ means.”
May
is currently leading her government to implement a nationally divisive
break of the United Kingdom from the European Union. Nationalist
sentiment here serves political expediency and despite the fact that a
British Prime Minister turned her back on centuries of Enlightenment values of the sort that made Britain the place where the Industrial Revolution began and appeared to embrace rhetoric that pays lip service to that most vile of all antisemitic texts, The Protocols of the Elders of Zion my focus is not on politics or Brexit.
May has gone from defending the EU as Home Secretary to bashing it as British Prime Minister
charged with delivering Brexit so where she really stands from a
principled point of view is something that I will leave for you, the
reader, to decide.
lewrockwell | And for those naive enough to question this basic assessment of the
state’s interests in Syria, ask yourself: if the US and its owned media
clique slavishly calls Assad a butcher and promoted chaos in his country
for purely humanitarian reasons, why aren’t they doing the same in
countries like Equatorial Guinea, Rwanda, and Chad? Those countries are
ruled by brutal dictators too. Yet your vacuous media guardians, those
valiant watchdogs of the truth, do not tell you every day how much of a
butcher they are or how we should overthrow their regimes.
The answer is clear: the financial interests that own these media
puppets do not prioritize those nations’ resources, strategic locations,
or financial structures. So you don’t hear every night how they’re run
by butchers. Instead, you see a congresswoman like Gabbard castigated
and demonized for daring to question their lying interventionist
narrative.
Is that too cynical to consider? Why not hang around your local city
commission for a while and see how much power jockeying, clique
politics, lying and back-stabbing goes on to decide who will get the
contract to build a new 2 million dollar road.
And you think humans, given access to the greatest monopoly of
military leverage in the US government, will magically just act in pure
humanitarian interest when trillions of dollars are at stake?
I’ve got a bridge to sell you in Aleppo.
Gabbard has criticized Assad’s role in the conflict. But she has also
been vocal in denouncing the US’s one party policy of arming terrorists
in Syria. She even introduced
a bill in Congress to stop arming terrorists. Our government aided and
weaponized ISIS and Al-Qaeda terrorists, the same group that attacked us
on 9-11, for the pathetic, pitiful lust for power and money available
in Syrian regime change.
Yet today, you’ll see headlines like these plastered all over the
hegemonic leftist media: POLITICO: Gabbard won’t disclose who’s paying
for secret trip to Syria
DAILY BEAST: Tulsi Gabbard’s Fascist Escorts to Syria The Democratic
congresswoman used affiliates of a violent, anti-Semitic political party
to take tea with Assad.
DAILY KOS: Rep. Tulsi Gabbard has turned into a stooge for Syria’s dictator. Who will primary her?
Remember, these are the same outlets who slavishly lined up to dine with the pro-Syrian coup Clinton campaign, as Wikileaks revealed. These are the same outlets who allowed their key reporters to submit their pre-published content for approval by Clinton operatives.
These reporters are of the same state-religious clique that
threatened Tulsi Gabbard’s career when she refused to bow the knee to
Hillary Clinton in the primary. They want power. They love the state
denomination of establishment leftism which allows them to use Syrian
migrants’ fleeing desperation as a photo-op to bludgeon their rival
state sect embodied in Trump.
The leftist media outlets incessantly questioning Gabbard’s call for
peace and an end to US-backed terrorism in Syria don’t care if our
intervention has destroyed cities and murdered and raped thousands. They
only care about the social status points they get in social circles
where being seen outraged at airport arrival lines is more important
than stopping mass murder for profit and power.
telesurtv |Mexico's state-owned oil company Pemex has been ransacked by President Enrique Peña Nieto, other government officials, and the country's oligarchy, andnow that it’s bankruptthey have turned it into a Ponzi scheme, prominent economist, researcher, analyst and author James Cypher told teleSUR.
“The Mexican State was levitated by rivers of gold received through the high levels of oil profits but this gold was used so that the oligarchy and their buddies could evade taxes ... almost,” Cypher said. “Public treasury was emptied out years ago — apart from the oil revenues, So, although Pemex has been a huge business, authorities were forced to seek loans everywhere to the oil company afloat.”
Currently, Pemex owes so much money and has been granted so many loans that it struggles to obtain credits, he said, adding that on Thursday the company sold bonds worth over US$250 million, increasing their debt in order to pay off loans.
“In other words, Pemex financing has become a Ponzi scheme,” said Cypher.
The Mexican State has always been in charge and barks out all the orders regarding all issues related to the country, but their achievements or profits always end up in the pockets of government officials.
“The State is an instrument used only for the benefit of the Mexican oligarchy first, and then for U.S. businesspeople and a few more — for example Canadians matter plenty in the mining sector,” Cypher explained.
The U.S. expert and analyst, who currently works for the Autonomous University of Zacatecas, said that contrary to what teleSUR's article on Pemex says regarding partial privatization of Pemex, Peña Nieto's intentions are to completely sell off the company to private enterprises.
The Mexican president’s plans for Pemex contemplate that the company continue operating but it will only carry out support activities that are not profitable.
“We have not had time to analyze how far Pemex will be stripped down but undoubtedly all profitable areas of the company will be taken over by the Mexican oligarchy first, and the rest to the giant oil companies from Houston, Texas,” he noted.
Cypher went on to say that it is almost certain that Hillary Clinton and her advisors participated in one way or another in creating the policies for privatization Peña Nieto has been pushing forward since he took office in 2013.
The renowned economist agreed with leftist Mexican party Morena saying, “Of course! The current Mexican government is going to take their usual share.”
Begrudgingly Acknowledged Country Bangers
-
When someone says they hate country music, they’re typically referring,
whether they know it or not, to the neotraditionalist “young country” that
arose in...
A Foundation of Joy
-
Two years and I've lost count of how many times my eye has been operated
on, either beating the fuck out of the tumor, or reattaching that slippery
eel ...
April Three
-
4/3
43
When 1 = A and 26 = Z
March = 43
What day?
4 to the power of 3 is 64
64th day is March 5
My birthday
March also has 5 letters.
4 x 3 = 12
...
Return of the Magi
-
Lately, the Holy Spirit is in the air. Emotional energy is swirling out of
the earth.I can feel it bubbling up, effervescing and evaporating around
us, s...
New Travels
-
Haven’t published on the Blog in quite a while. I at least part have been
immersed in the area of writing books. My focus is on Science Fiction an
Historic...
Covid-19 Preys Upon The Elderly And The Obese
-
sciencemag | This spring, after days of flulike symptoms and fever, a man
arrived at the emergency room at the University of Vermont Medical Center.
He ...