aspendailynews | Building a wall between Mexico and the United States has been a
controversial issue in America's current election cycle, but in India,
it's a moot point. That's because the country has nearly completed a
2,500-mile, double barbed-wire fence all the way around its border with
Bangladesh and instituted a shoot-on-sight policy.
Indian officials say the wall was primarily built to prevent the
smuggling of narcotics, but it should also be noted that illegal
migration over the past two decades is a major issue. As Bangladesh
continues to be an epicenter for climate change refugees — with tens of
millions of people to be displaced by rising sea levels, drought and
famine — India's concern about a flood of immigrants into its country is
also a catalyst, points out "The Age of Consequences," a documentary
screening in Aspen on Monday, Nov. 7.
The film, which hit the festival circuit in the spring and is set to be
released theatrically in early 2017, looks at climate change through a
lens of global security, featuring interviews with several military
leaders and experts. It starts by examining the history of Syrian civil
war, which undoubtedly is rooted in centuries o conflict, yet
accelerated by a severe three-year drought in the mid-2000s which forced
1.5 million people from the agricultural countryside into major cities.
"A bunch of unemployed young men in a major city is not a recipe for
stability," says Brig. Gen. Stephen Curry, of the U.S. Marine Corps.
Today, Syria is the headquarters for the Islamic State, and they're
using resource scarcity to their advantage, the movie explains. With
less water, extremists leverage the resource to take over local
populations, as seen with ISIS' withholding of water storage facilities
in Syria.
aljazeera |Trump is the late Shah of Iran and the late Saddam Hussein of
Iraq put together. Trump is every single Arab general or dictator the US
has befriended and kept in power.
These and scores of other nasty, brutish, vile and vulgar
dictators are - and have been - supported, endorsed, kept in power, and
used and abused to serve the US and its favourite settler colony Israel
military and economic might, and they all fall into the category of
Roosevelt's "our sons of bitches".
"Yes, it would be worthwhile to study clinically, in detail, the
steps taken by Hitler and Hitlerism," Aime Cesaire said famously in his
Discourse on Colonialism, "and to reveal to the very
distinguished, very humanistic, very Christian bourgeois of the 20th
century that without his being aware of it, he has a Hitler inside him,
that Hitler inhabits him, that Hitler is his demon, that if he rails
against him, he is being inconsistent and that, at bottom, what he
cannot forgive Hitler for is not crime in itself, the crime against man,
it is not the humiliation of man as such, it is the crime against the
white man, the humiliation of the white man, and the fact that he
applied to Europe colonialist procedures which until then had been
reserved exclusively for the Arabs of Algeria, the coolies of India, and
the niggers of Africa."
Cesaire anticipated Trump and reaction to Trump too, for Trump is now
equally poised to do to America what Mussolini did in Libya, King
Leopoldo II in the Congo, the French in Algeria, the British in India,
the Spaniards in the Americas, the Israelis in Palestine. Obama is not
happy with Trump. He and his wife Michelle Obama and the entire
Democratic Party and liberal stalwarts like Elizabeth Warren are really
concerned what Trump might do to America what they have done to the
world at large.
Trump is the nasty Mr Hyde hiding inside the lovely looking Dr Barack Jekyll Obama, coming out unexpectedly for a house call.
Liberal America is up in arms capturing their Mr Hyde, hiding
it inside President Hillary Rodham Clinton in the White House so she can
do as US presidents habitually do, ripping the world to pieces and
keeping the liberal heart of this empire bleeding for "peace on earth"
just in time for next Christmas.
guardian | Teenagers in America are resorting to sex work because they cannot afford food, according to a study that suggests widespread hunger in the world’s wealthiest country.
Focus groups in all 10 communities analysed by the Urban Institute,
a Washington-based thinktank, described girls “selling their body” or
“sex for money” as a strategy to make ends meet. Boys desperate for food
were said to go to extremes such as shoplifting and selling drugs.
The findings raise questions over the legacy of Bill Clinton’s landmark welfare-reform legislation
20 years ago as well as the spending priorities of Congress and the
impact of slow wage growth. Evidence of teenage girls turning to
“transactional dating” with older men is likely to cause particular
alarm.
“I’ve been doing research in low-income communities for a long time,
and I’ve written extensively about the experiences of women in high
poverty communities and the risk of sexual exploitation, but this was
new,” said Susan Popkin, a senior fellow at the Urban Institute and lead author of the report, Impossible Choices.
“Even for me, who has been paying attention to this and has heard
women tell their stories for a long time, the extent to which we were
hearing about food being related to this vulnerability was new and
shocking to me, and the level of desperation that it implies was really
shocking to me. It’s a situation I think is just getting worse over
time.”
The qualitative study, carried out in partnership with the food banks network Feeding America,
created two focus groups – one male, one female – in each of 10 poor
communities across the US. The locations included big cities such as
Chicago, Los Angeles and Washington and rural North Carolina and eastern
Oregon. A total of 193 participants aged 13 to 18 took part and were
allowed to remain anonymous.
Their testimony paints a picture of teenagers – often overlooked by
policymakers focused on children aged zero to five – missing meals,
making sacrifices and going hungry, with worrying long-term
consequences.
Popkin said: “We heard the same story everywhere, a really disturbing
picture about hunger and food insecurity affecting the wellbeing of
some of the most vulnerable young people. The fact that we heard it
everywhere from kids in the same way tells us there’s a problem out
there that we should be paying attention to.”
The consistency of the findings across gender, race and geography was a surprise.
nypost | There are decaying post-industrial Middletowns all over the map. In
1970, Vance notes, 25 percent of white children lived in neighborhoods
with poverty rates above 10 percent. By 2000 the figure had risen to 40
percent, and Vance believes it is higher today. The life expectancy for
Vance’s people is declining.
Trump’s promises to stand up to the Chinese are resonating, as is his
message that “the system is rigged” against a proud group of Americans,
Americans who built the postwar glory but now feel they’re being
ignored or outright mocked. White trash is the one ethnic group it is
still OK to make fun of.
“Humans appear to have some need to look down on someone; there’s
just a basic tribalistic impulse in all of us,” Vance recently told The
American Conservative. “And if you’re an elite white professional,
working-class whites are an easy target: You don’t have to feel guilty
for being a racist or a xenophobe. By looking down on the hillbilly, you
can get that high of self-righteousness and superiority without
violating any of the moral norms of your own tribe.”
Mapping the politics of Vance’s clannish, resentful neighbors is
challenging, even exasperating. Hillbillies pride themselves on
distinguishing the deserving poor from the lazy moochers, but Vance
points out that it’s a fuzzy line. His grandmother would lash out at the
government for doing too much, then for doing too little. She’d ask why
society could afford aircraft carriers but not enough drug-rehab
centers. She’d complain that the rich weren’t paying their fair share.
But she and J.D. would be just as angry at people who paid for T-bone
steaks with food stamps and hated the idea of the government using
Section 8 housing vouchers so that poor people could move in next door —
poor people “like us,” Vance says. She’d say people wouldn’t have so
many problems if they were forced to work for their benefit checks.
NYTimes | Artificial intelligence is booming. But why now?
Move over, social media and mobility: Silicon Valley has a next big thing, John Markoffwrites, and it’s A.I. and robots. It is useful to think of them as part of the same thing, since many robots are autonomous machines programmed for decision making based on A.I.
The movement can be thought of as a spread of computing intelligence everywhere, on wheels and wings, in your pocket and all through your house. That’s a big enough idea to fund scores of companies, and quite possibly set up the next Silicon Valley boom. And bubble.
Yet it’s worth asking how much of this is reality and how much is wishful thinking. Why is A.I. growing the way it didn’t over the last several decades, despite promises that it would?
The answer to that lies in the precursors to this A.I. moment, which more than anything has to do with the Google-led search boom 10 years ago.
In 2006, Google andYahooreleased new methods of analyzing the quirky real-world data they were picking up from doing search. Data from browsers can be thought of as a proxy for human behavior, as people wander the web. It’s typically called “unstructured” data, as opposed to the more regular information of things like banking and airline schedules that filled most of the world’s databases.
That new way of seeing the real world helped make search profitable and also enabled companies likeFacebookto look into even stranger social behavior. The success also gave these companies plenty of money to plow into the problem.
To money, and the first ever caches of natural behavior in digital form, add cheaper computing. In 2006, Amazon also introduced its cloud-computing business. Over the last decade, retail cloud computing has become an inexpensive way for lots of people to work on data analysis and pattern finding, the heart of A.I.
Only one more thing was needed, and in 2007Applecame out with the iPhone. Let that stand for browser-type natural data collection moving off desktops and blowing through the natural world. Along with other cheap sensors tied to the cloud, it has given us huge amounts of data about all sorts of things.
That created many more places where computers could do what they’ve always done, which is to seek efficiency. That has created a cycle:more observation, more machine learning of patterns, more value capture funding more observation.
It’s enough to make you believe in this boom.
What could make you believe it’s also a bubble? Start with the name, artificial intelligence. So far there is zero evidence we will be about to build machines that possess intelligence or will really think on their own. If big money goes into that stuff, run for the hills.
"Does the US Department of Defense see protest movements and social
activism in different parts of the world as a threat to US national
security? If so, why? Does the US Department of Defense consider
political movements aiming for large scale political and economic change
as a national security matter? If so, why? Activism,
protest, 'political movements' and of course NGOs are a vital element
of a healthy civil society and democracy - why is it that the DoD is
funding research to investigate such issues?"
Minerva's programme director Dr Erin Fitzgerald said "I appreciate
your concerns and am glad that you reached out to give us the
opportunity to clarify" before promising a more detailed response.
Instead, I received the following bland statement from the DoD's press
office:
"The Department of Defense takes seriously its role in the security
of the United States, its citizens, and US allies and partners. While
every security challenge does not cause conflict, and every conflict
does not involve the US military,
Minerva helps fund basic social science research that helps increase
the Department of Defense's understanding of what causes instability and
insecurity around the world. By better understanding these conflicts
and their causes beforehand, the Department of Defense can better
prepare for the dynamic future security environment."
In 2013, Minerva funded a University of Maryland project in
collaboration with the US Department of Energy's Pacific Northwest
National Laboratory to gauge the risk of civil unrest due to climate
change. The three-year $1.9 million project is developing models to anticipate what could happen to societies under a range of potential climate change scenarios.
From the outset, the Minerva programme was slated to provide over $75
million over five years for social and behavioural science research.
This year alone it has been allocated a total budget of $17.8 million by
US Congress.
The internal email from Prof Steve Corman, a principal investigator
for the project, describes a meeting hosted by the DoD's Human Social
Cultural and Behavioural Modeling (HSCB) programme in which senior
Pentagon officials said their priority was "to develop capabilities that
are deliverable quickly" in the form of "models and tools that can be
integrated with operations."
washingtonsblog | While many Americans understand why the NSA is conducting mass
surveillance of U.S. citizens, some are still confused about what’s
really going on.
In his new book, No Place to Hide, Glenn Greenwald writes:
The
perception that invasive surveillance is confined only to a
marginalised and deserving group of those “doing wrong” – the bad people
– ensures that the majority acquiesces to the abuse of power or even
cheers it on. But that view radically misunderstands what goals drive
all institutions of authority. “Doing something wrong” in the eyes of
such institutions encompasses far more than illegal acts, violent
behaviour and terrorist plots. It typically extends to meaningful dissent and any genuine challenge. It is the nature of authority to equate dissent with wrongdoing, or at least with a threat.
The
record is suffused with examples of groups and individuals being placed
under government surveillance by virtue of their dissenting views and
activism – Martin Luther King, the civil rights movement, anti-war activists, environmentalists. In the eyes of the government and J Edgar Hoover’s FBI, they were all “doing something wrong”: political activity that threatened the prevailing order.
The
FBI’s domestic counterintelligence programme, Cointelpro, was first
exposed by a group of anti-war activists who had become convinced that
the anti-war movement had been infiltrated, placed under surveillance
and targeted with all sorts of dirty tricks. Lacking documentary
evidence to prove it and unsuccessful in convincing journalists to write
about their suspicions, they broke into an FBI branch office in
Pennsylvania in 1971 and carted off thousands of documents.
Files
related to Cointelpro showed how the FBI had targeted political groups
and individuals it deemed subversive and dangerous, including the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, black nationalist movements, socialist and communist organizations, anti-war protesters and various rightwing groups.
The bureau had infiltrated them with agents who, among other things,
attempted to manipulate members into agreeing to commit criminal acts so
that the FBI could arrest and prosecute them.
Those revelations
led to the creation of the Senate Church Committee, which concluded:
“[Over the course of 15 years] the bureau conducted a sophisticated
vigilate operation aimed squarely at preventing the exercise of first
amendment rights of speech and association, on the theory that
preventing the growth of dangerous groups and the propagation of
dangerous ideas would protect the national security and deter violence.”
These
incidents were not aberrations of the era. During the Bush years, for
example, documents obtained by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU)
revealed, as the group put it in 2006, “new details of Pentagon
surveillance of Americans opposed to the Iraq war, including Quakers and student groups“.
The Pentagon was “keeping tabs on non-violent protesters by collecting
information and storing it in a military anti-terrorism database”. The
evidence shows that assurances that surveillance is only targeted at
those who “have done something wrong” should provide little comfort,
since a state will reflexively view any challenge to its power as
wrongdoing.
The opportunity those in power have to characterise political opponents
as “national security threats” or even “terrorists” has repeatedly
proven irresistible. In the past decade, the government, in an echo of
Hoover’s FBI, has formally so designated environmental
activists, broad swaths of anti-government rightwing groups, anti-war
activists, and associations organised around Palestinian rights. Some individuals within those broad categories may deserve the designation, but undoubtedly most do not, guilty only of holding opposing political views. Yet such groups are routinely targeted for surveillance by the NSA and its partners.
One
document from the Snowden files, dated 3 October 2012, chillingly
underscores the point. It revealed that the agency has been monitoring
the online activities of individuals it believes express “radical” ideas
and who have a “radicalising” influence on others.
***
The
NSA explicitly states that none of the targeted individuals is a member
of a terrorist organisation or involved in any terror plots. Instead,
their crime is the views they express, which are deemed “radical“, a term that warrants pervasive surveillance and destructive campaigns to “exploit vulnerabilities”.
Among
the information collected about the individuals, at least one of whom
is a “US person”, are details of their online sex activities and “online
promiscuity” – the porn sites they visit and surreptitious sex chats
with women who are not their wives. The agency discusses ways to exploit
this information to destroy their reputations and credibility.
Most Americans could not even conceive of such a thing. But of
course the truth is that up until just recently most Venezuelans could
not either. In fact, just a couple years ago Venezuela was one of the
most prosperous nations in all of South America…
Two years ago, Venezuela was a normal functioning nation,
relatively speaking of course. It was by no means a free country, but
the people still had a standard of living that was higher than most
developing nations. Venezuelans could still afford the basic necessities
of life, and a few luxuries too.
They could send their children to school and expect them to receive a
reasonably good education, and they could go to the hospital and expect
to be effectively treated with the same medical standards you’d find in
a developed nation. They could go to the grocery store and buy whatever
they needed, and basic government services like law enforcement and
infrastructure maintenance worked fairly well. The system was far from
perfect, but it worked for the most part.
There are all sorts of signs that the thin veneer of civilization
that we all take for granted in the United States is starting to crumble
as well. If you follow End Of The American Dream
on a regular basis, you know that I post articles about this theme all
the time. But today I just want to share one tidbit with you. Reuters is reporting that the number of heroin users in this country has nearly tripled since 2003, and the number of heroin-related deaths is now about five times higher than it was in the year 2000…
A heroin “epidemic” is gripping the United States, where cheap supply has helped push the number of users to a 20-year high, increasing drug-related deaths, the United Nations said on Thursday.
According to the U.N.’s World Drug Report 2016, the number of heroin
users in the United States reached around one million in 2014, almost
three times as many as in 2003. Heroin-related deaths there have
increased five-fold since 2000.
“There is really a huge epidemic (of) heroin in the U.S.,” said
Angela Me, the chief researcher for the report which was released on
Thursday.
Just like Venezuela, our society is rotting too. As I have warned before, the exact same things that are happening down there right now are coming here too.
charleshughsmith | Our status quo is not only failing to solve humanity’s six core problems-- it has become the problem.
To explain why this is so, I wrote Why Our Status Quo Failed and Is Beyond Reform, a new book that's focused (90 pages) and affordable, i.e. the cost of a latte ($3.95 Kindle ebook, $8.95 print edition).
Why can’t our status quo be reformed? There are two primary reasons:
1) Those benefiting from the current arrangement will resist any reforms
that threaten their share of the pie--and meaningful reforms will
necessarily threaten everyone’s slice of the pie.
2) Reforms that actually address the structural flaws will bring the
system down, as the status quo can only continue if its engine
(permanent expansion of debt and consumption) is running at full speed.
Once the engine stalls or even slows, the system collapses.
This is unwelcome news not just to privileged insiders--and the harsh reality is that our status quo exists to protect the privileges of the few at the expense of the many--but to everyone who hopes to benefit in some way from our status quo's cornucopia of promises.
So
we cling to the dangerous hope that all the promises can be met by some
future magic, and cocoon ourselves in an equally dangerous denial that
collapse is inevitable. We don't just want to avoid the decay and
collapse of all the happy promises--we want to avoid the responsibility
of taking part in shaping the replacement system.
Well he’s back, and he recently shared more groundbreaking information in a fascinating interview with AlterNet. Here are some choice excerpts:
Ken Klippenstein: In the book you describe Saudi
financial support for the compound in which Osama Bin Laden was being
kept in Pakistan. Was that Saudi government officials, private
individuals or both?
Seymour Hersh: The Saudis bribed the
Pakistanis not to tell us [that the Pakistani government had Bin Laden]
because they didn’t want us interrogating Bin Laden (that’s my best
guess), because he would’ve talked to us, probably. My guess is, we
don’t know anything really about 9/11. We just don’t know. We don’t know
what role was played by whom.
Bingo. We don’t know anything, except that the U.S. government has been lying to the public for 15 years.
unz | The white underclass are the aborigines of the post-industrial age.
It’s absurd for Kevin Williamson to tell them to get a U-Haul and move
out of their dying communities. They’ll just be underclass whites
somewhere else, with lives just as empty. There is no solution for them,
any more than there is for Eskimos or aborigines, other than the one they’ve found in drink, drugs, and despair. The smart, capable, and energetic ones will escape and get lives, as always happens; the rest will sink into squalor.
Charles Murray, who wrote about the problems of the white underclass in his 2012 book Coming Apart, is more honest about this than is Kevin Williamson. Last July, I reviewed three social science books in a column for VDARE: one of them was Murray’s Coming Apart, another was Robert Putnam’s Our Kids: The American Dream in Crisis. I linked to a televised debate between Murray and Putnam, where Murray says this (click here to go to 43:24):
Bob has already referred to my take-away from all this
with the ways in which we really need a civic Great Awakening. However,
I’ve got to say that the fact is, civic Great Awakenings have about as
much chance of transforming what’s going on as a full implementation of
Bob’s “purple” programs does.
The parsimonious way to extrapolate the trends that Bob describes so
beautifully in the book is to predict an America permanently segregated
into social classes that no longer share the common bonds that once made
this country so exceptional; and the destruction of the national civic
culture that Bob and I both cherish. I hope for a better outcome: I do
not expect it. The American dream in crisis? A discussion with Robert Putnam and Charles Murray,Streamed live on Jun 22, 2015
And if you think that’s the bad news, talk to an AI alarmist—one of those people, I mean, and the category includes some very smart people indeed, like Elon Musk and Steven Hawking—one
of those people who think that Artificial Intelligence will advance to a
point where all of us, our entire species, is the aborigines, our
culture superseded by one much more advanced, Homo sapiens shuffled off into reservations to drink ourselves to death.
Yesterday, the Eskimos and Apaches; today, the white underclass; tomorrow perhaps you and me. Who knows?
Like Charles Murray, I hope for a better outcome, but I do not expect it.
jacobinmag | As William Gibson famously remarked, “the future is already here; it’s just unevenly distributed.”
But what if resources and energy are simply too scarce to allow
everyone to enjoy the material standard of living of today’s rich? What
if we arrive in a future that no longer requires the mass proletariat’s
labor in production, but is unable to provide everyone with an
arbitrarily high standard of consumption? If we arrive in that world as
an egalitarian society, than the answer is the socialist regime of
shared conservation described in the previous section. But if, instead,
we remain a society polarized between a privileged elite and a
downtrodden mass, then the most plausible trajectory leads to something
much darker; I will call it by the term that E. P. Thompson used to
describe a different dystopia, during the peak of the cold war: exterminism.
The great danger posed by the automation of production, in the
context of a world of hierarchy and scarce resources, is that it makes
the great mass of people superfluous from the standpoint of the ruling
elite. This is in contrast to capitalism, where the antagonism between
capital and labor was characterized by both a clash of interests and a
relationship of mutual dependence: the workers depend on capitalists as
long as they don’t control the means of production themselves, while the
capitalists need workers to run their factories and shops. It is as the
lyrics of “Solidarity Forever” had it: “They have taken untold millions
that they never toiled to earn/But without our brain and muscle not a
single wheel can turn.” With the rise of the robots, the second line
ceases to hold.
The existence of an impoverished, economically superfluous rabble
poses a great danger to the ruling class, which will naturally fear
imminent expropriation; confronted with this threat, several courses of
action present themselves. The masses can be bought off with some degree
of redistribution of resources, as the rich share out their wealth in
the form of social welfare programs, at least if resource constraints
aren’t too binding. But in addition to potentially reintroducing
scarcity into the lives of the rich, this solution is liable to lead to
an ever-rising tide of demands on the part of the masses, thus raising
the specter of expropriation once again. This is essentially what
happened at the high tide of the welfare state, when bosses began to
fear that both profits and control over the workplace were slipping out
of their hands.
If buying off the angry mob isn’t a sustainable strategy, another
option is simply to run away and hide from them. This is the trajectory
of what the sociologist Bryan Turner calls “enclave society”,
an order in which “governments and other agencies seek to regulate
spaces and, where necessary, to immobilize flows of people, goods and
services” by means of “enclosure, bureaucratic barriers, legal
exclusions and registrations.” Gated communities, private islands,
ghettos, prisons, terrorism paranoia, biological quarantines; together,
these amount to an inverted global gulag, where the rich live in tiny
islands of wealth strewn around an ocean of misery. In Tropic of Chaos,
Christian Parenti makes the case that we are already constructing this
new order, as climate change brings about what he calls the
“catastrophic convergence” of ecological disruption, economic
inequality, and state failure. The legacy of colonialism and
neoliberalism is that the rich countries, along with the elites of the
poorer ones, have facilitated a disintegration into anarchic violence,
as various tribal and political factions fight over the diminishing
bounty of damaged ecosystems. Faced with this bleak reality, many of the
rich — which, in global terms, includes many workers in the rich
countries as well — have resigned themselves to barricading themselves
into their fortresses, to be protected by unmanned drones and private
military contractors. Guard labor, which we encountered in the rentist
society, reappears in an even more malevolent form, as a lucky few are
employed as enforcers and protectors for the rich.
But this too, is an unstable equilibrium, for the same basic reason
that buying off the masses is. So long as the immiserated hordes exist,
there is the danger that it may one day become impossible to hold them
at bay. Once mass labor has been rendered superfluous, a final solution
lurks: the genocidal war of the rich against the poor. Many have called
the recent Justin Timberlake vehicle, In Time, a Marxist film,
but it is more precisely a parable of the road to exterminism. In the
movie, a tiny ruling class literally lives forever in their gated
enclaves due to genetic technology, while everyone else is programmed to
die at 25 unless they can beg, borrow or steal more time. The only
thing saving the workers is that the rich still have some need for their
labor; when that need expires, so presumably will the working class
itself.
marketwatch | One view of what caused the Great Depression in the 1930s is that the Federal Reserve failed to prevent a collapse in the money supply.
This is the famous thesis of Milton Friedman’s and Anna Schwartz’sA Monetary History of the United States, 1867-1960, and it was, more or less, the view of Ben Bernanke when he was chairman of the Federal Reserve.
The global economy today resembles that of the 1930s in several ominous ways.
Financial authorEdward Chancellorrecently called attention to apaper written by Claudio Borio, head economist at the Bank of International Settlements, that provides a fuller picture of the causes of the Great Depression. The paper also draws parallels between global economic conditions that led to the rise of protectionism in the 1930s and our situation now.
The paper’s thesis is that “financial elasticity” characterizes both the pre-Depression global economy and today’s global economy. Elasticity refers to the buildup of capital imbalances such as money flows into emerging markets because of low rates in developed markets.
Science | The war against malaria has a new ally: a controversial technology for spreading genes throughout a population of animals. Researchers report today that they have harnessed a so-called gene drive to efficiently endow mosquitoes with genes that should make them immune to the malaria parasite—and unable to spread it. On its own, gene drive won’t get rid of malaria, but if successfully applied in the wild the method could help wipe out the disease, at least in some corners of the world. The approach “can bring us to zero [cases],” says Nora Besansky, a geneticist at the University of Notre Dame in South Bend, Indiana, who specializes in malaria-carrying mosquitoes. “The mosquitos do their own work [and] reach places we can’t afford to go or get to.”
But testing that promise in the field may have to wait until a wider debate over gene drives is resolved. The essence of this long-discussed strategy for spreading a genetic trait, such as disease resistance, is to bias inheritance so that more than the expected half of a subsequent generation inherits it. The gene drive concept attracted new attention earlier this year, when geneticists studying fruit flies adapted a gene editing technology called CRISPR-Cas9 to help spread a mutation—and were startled to find it worked so well that the mutation reached almost all fly progeny. Their report, published this spring in Science (20 March, p. 1300) came out less than a year after an eLife paper discussed the feasibility of a CRISPR-Cas9 gene drive system but warned that it could disrupt ecosystems and wipe out populations of entire species.
A firestorm quickly erupted over the risks of experimenting with gene drives, nevermind applying them in the field. The U.S. National Academy of Sciences (NAS) has convened a committee to weigh the risks and propose safeguards, and the authors of the eLife andScience papers have laid out guidelines for experiments (Science, 28 August, p. 927).
afurtherrecord |
MR. O. Let us return to the question of justice. It is interesting for
language. What is justice?
Q. Something that is fair to two people.
MR. O. Who would be fair? As conditional arrangement it can be
understood. As a general thing, it is fantastic. You forget that
organic life is based on murder. One thing eats another: cats and rats.
What is justice among cats and rats? This is life. It is nothing very
beautiful. So where is justice?
Q. Why do people think that nature is beautiful if this is how it works?
MR. O. What is beautiful? What you like.
Q. How can God be love if He created nature like this?
MR. O. For a certain purpose. Besides, what do you call nature?
Earthquake is also nature. But for the moment we apply the term
'nature' to organic life. Evidently it was created like that because
there was no other means. How can we ask why? It was made so. If we
don't like it, we can study methods to run away. This is the only
possibility. Only we must not try to imagine that it is very beautiful.
We must not pretend that facts are different from what they are.
Q. Are you going to put man on the same footing as the rest of organic
life?
MR. O. There is no difference, only other units are fully developed,
and man is only half developed.
Q. Man can be beyond the law of murder?
MR. O. He has the possibility of escape.
Q. What are ways of escape from murder?
MR. O. Man is under 192 laws. He must escape from some of them.
Q. You said that men are responsible for what they did, and animals not?
MR. O. Men 1, 2 and 3 are less responsible; men No. 4, and so on, are
more responsible; responsibility grows.
Q. What means responsibility?
MR. O. First, an animal has nothing to lose, but man has. Second, man
has to pay for every mistake he makes, if he has started to grow.
Q. That implies justice.
MR. O. No, nobody would call it justice if you had to pay for your
mistakes.
Q. Does not justice mean to get what we deserve?
MR. O. Most people think it is getting what we want and not what we
deserve. Justice must mean some co-ordination between actions and
results of actions. This certainly does not exist, and cannot exist,
under the Law of Accident. When we know the chief laws, we understand
that we live in a very bad place, a really bad place. But, as we cannot
be in any other, we must see what we can do here. Only, we must not
imagine that things are better than they are.
Q. Things will remain as they are unless everyone is conscious?
MR. O. Things will remain as they are, but one can escape. It needs
much knowledge to know what can be escaped and what cannot. But the
first lesson we must learn, the first thing that prevents us from
escaping is that we don't even realize the necessity to know our
position. Who knows it, is already in a better position.
deoxy | History is ending because the dominator culture has led the human species into a blind alley, and as the inevitable chaostrophie approaches, people look for metaphors and answers. Every time a culture gets into trouble it casts itself back into the past looking for the last sane moment it ever knew. And the last sane moment we ever knew was on the plains of Africa 15,000 years ago rocked in the cradle of the Great Horned Mushroom Goddess before history, before standing armies, before slavery and property, before warfare and phonetic alphabets and monotheism, before, before, before. And this is where the future is taking us because the secret faith of the twentieth century
is not modernism, the secret faith of the twentieth century is nostalgia for the archaic, nostalgia for the paleolithic, and that gives us body piercing, abstract expressionism, surrealism, jazz, rock-n-roll and catastrophe theory. The 20th century mind is nostalgic for the paradise that once existed on the mushroom dotted plains of Africa where the plant-human symbiosis occurred that pulled us out of the animal body and into the tool-using, culture-making, imagination-exploring creature that we are. And why does this matter? It matters because it shows that the way out is back and that the future is a forward escape into the past. This is what the psychedelic experience means. Its a doorway out of history and into the wiring under the board in eternity. And I tell you this because if the community understands what it is that holds it together the community will be better able to streamline itself for flight into hyperspace because what we need is a new myth, what we need is a new true story that tells us where we're going in the universe and that true story is that the ego is a product of pathology, and when psilocybin is regularly part of the human experience the ego is supressed and the supression of the ego means the defeat of the dominators, the materialists, the product peddlers. Psychedelics return us to the inner worth of the self, to the importance of the feeling of immediate experience - and nobody can sell that to you and nobody can buy it from you, so the dominator culture is not interested in the felt presence of immediate experience, but that's what holds the community together.
What WE represent is the nexus of concrescent novelty that has been moving itself together, complexifying itself, folding itself in upon itself for billions and billions of years. There is, so far as we know, nothing more advanced than what is sitting behind your eyes. The human neocortex is the most densely ramified complexified structure in the known universe. We are the cutting edge of organismic transformation of matter in this cosmos. And this has been going on for a while; since the discovery of fire, since the discovery of language. But now, and by now I mean in the last 10,000 years, we've been into something new. Not genetic information, not genetic mutation, not natural selection, but epigenetic activity: writing, theatre, poetry, dance, art, tattooing, body piercing and philisophy. And these things have accelerated the ingression into novelty so that we have become an idea excreting force in nature that builds temples, builds cities, builds machines, social engines, plans, and spreads over the Earth, into space, into the micro-physical domain, into the micro-physical domain. We, who five million years ago were animals, can kindle in our deserts and if necesary upon the cities of our enemies the very energy which lights the stars at night. Now, something peculiar is going on here. Something is calling us out of nature and sculpting us in it's own image. And the confrontation with this something is now not so far away. This is what the impending apparent end of everything actually means. It means that the de-no-ma(?) of human history is about to occur and is about to be revealed as a universal process of compressing and expressing novelty that is now going to become so intensified that it is going to flow over into another dimension.
You can feel it. You can feel it in your own dreams. You can feel it in your own trips. You can feel that we're approaching the cusp of a catastrophe, and that beyond that cusp we are unrecognizable to ourselves. The wave of novelty that has rolled unbroken since the birth of the universe has now focussed and coalesced itself in our species. And if it seems unlikely to you that the world is about to transform itself, then think of it this way: think of a pond, and think of how if the surface of the pond begins to boil - that's the signal that some enormous protean form is about to break the surface of the pond and reveal itself. Human history IS the boiling of the pond surface of ordinary biology. We are flesh which has been caught in the grip of some kind of an attractor that lies ahead of us in time, and that is sculpting us to its ends; speaking to us through psychedelics, through visions, through culture, and technology, consciousness. The language forming capacity in our species is propelling itself forward as though it were going to shed the monkey body and leap into some extra-surreal space that surrounds us, but that we can not currently see. Even the people who run the planet, the World Bank, the IMF, you name it, they know that history is ending. They know by the reports which cross their desks: the disappearance of the ozone hole [?], the toxification of the ocean, the clearing of the rain forests. What this means is that the womb of the planet has reached its finite limits, and that the human species has now, without choice, begun the decent down the birth canal of collective transformation toward something right around the corner and nearly completely unimaginable. And this is where the psychedelic shaman comes is because I believe that what we really contact through psychedelics is a kind of hyperspace. And from that hyperspace we look down on..., we look down on both the past and the future, and we anticipate the end. And a shaman is someone who has seen the end, and therefore is a trickster, because you don't worry if you've seen the end. If you know how it comes out you go back and you take your place in the play, and you let it all roll on without anxiety. This is what boundary dissolution means. It means nothing less than the anticipation of the end state of human history.
royalsociety | Studies aimed at explaining the evolution of phenotypic traits have
often solely focused on fitness considerations, ignoring underlying
mechanisms. In recent years, there has been an increasing call for
integrating mechanistic perspectives in evolutionary considerations, but
it is not clear whether and how mechanisms affect the course and
outcome of evolution. To study this, we compare four mechanistic
implementations of two well-studied models for the evolution of
cooperation, the Iterated Prisoner's Dilemma (IPD) game and the Iterated
Snowdrift (ISD) game. Behavioural strategies are either implemented by a
1 : 1 genotype–phenotype mapping or by a simple neural network.
Moreover, we consider two different scenarios for the effect of
mutations. The same set of strategies is feasible in all four
implementations, but the probability that a given strategy arises owing
to mutation is largely dependent on the behavioural and genetic
architecture. Our individual-based simulations show that this has major
implications for the evolutionary outcome. In the ISD, different
evolutionarily stable strategies are predominant in the four
implementations, while in the IPD each implementation creates a
characteristic dynamical pattern. As a consequence, the evolved average
level of cooperation is also strongly dependent on the underlying
mechanism. We argue that our findings are of general relevance for the
evolution of social behaviour, pleading for the integration of a
mechanistic perspective in models of social evolution.
counterpunch | Last night’s FOX News GOP Presidential Debate Extravaganza featured
the most riveting two minute political exchange ever heard on national
television. During a brief colloquy between Republican frontrunner
Donald Trump and Fox moderator Brett Baier, the pugnacious casino
magnate revealed the appalling truth about the American political
system, that the big money guys like Trump own the whole crooked
contraption lock, stock, and barrel, and that, the nation’s fake
political leaders do whatever they’re told to do. Without question, it
was most illuminating commentary to ever cross the airwaves. Here’s the
entire exchange direct from the transcript:
FOX News Brett Baier (talking to Trump): Now, 15 years
ago, you called yourself a liberal on health care. You were for a
single-payer system, a Canadian-style system. Why were you for that then
and why aren’t you for it now?
TRUMP: As far as single payer, it works in Canada. It works
incredibly well in Scotland. It could have worked in a different age,
which is the age you’re talking about here.
What I’d like to see is a private system without the artificial lines
around every state. I have a big company with thousands and thousands
of employees. And if I’m negotiating in New York or in New Jersey or in
California, I have like one bidder. Nobody can bid.
You know why?
Because the insurance companies are making a fortune because they
have control of the politicians, of course, with the exception of the
politicians on this stage. (uneasy laughter) But they have total control
of the politicians. They’re making a fortune.
Get rid of the artificial lines and you will have…yourself great plans…
BAIER: Mr. Trump, it’s not just your past support for single-payer
health care. You’ve also supported a host of other liberal
policies….You’ve also donated to several Democratic candidates, Hillary
Clinton included, and Nancy Pelosi. You explained away those donations
saying you did that to get business-related favors. And you said
recently, quote, “When you give, they do whatever the hell you want them
to do.”
TRUMP: You’d better believe it.
BAIER: — they do?
TRUMP: If I ask them, if I need them, you know, most of the people on
this stage I’ve given to, just so you understand, a lot of money.
TRUMP: I will tell you that our system is broken. I gave to many
people, before this, before two months ago, I was a businessman. I give
to everybody. When they call, I give. And do you know what? When I need
something from them two years later, three years later, I call them,
they are there for me. And that’s a broken system.
religiondispatches | Pope Francis is popular among young Catholics, with only two percent
having a negative view of him. But the American church hierarchy is not
looked on so kindly, and there is an increasing emphasis on a separation
between politics and religion. A full 80 percent of respondents said
they felt no need to follow the bishops’ advice when it comes time to
vote, and 77 percent said Catholic politicians were under no obligation
to follow the bishops either.
They are also opposed by a wide margin to bishops withholding
communion to the divorced and remarried, those who support legal
abortion, and those who support marriage equality.
What’s missing from this survey, however, is the question of church
attendance. How much are these Catholics who disagree with and question
church teaching are actually showing up? Christian Smith, the head of
the National Study of Youth and Religion at Notre Dame, says the situation with Catholic millennials participating in church culture is “in fact, grim.”Only 16% of millennials self-identify as Catholic according to Pew. That 16% is the group the church is struggling to hold on to.
So if they are increasingly choosing the liberal side in the culture wars, are they really still Catholic?
Canon Law
204.1 states that a Catholic not only has to be baptized, but also
“share the profession of faith, the sacraments, and ecclesiastical
governance” to be “considered in communion with the Church.” Canon Law
208-223 has more specific rules for acting out the obligation of the
laity, but some of those rules are ambiguously stated, including 209.1,
which tells us that “the Christian faithful, even in their own manner of
acting, are always obliged to maintain communion with the Church,” or
210, which says that Christians should try to lead a “holy life” but
“according to their own condition.”
The linguistic ambiguity of Canon Law, along with the fact that very
few Catholics bother to read it, means that belonging to the church is
ill defined.
For most Catholics—and especially for younger ones whose Boomer and Gen X parents may themselves have drifted from the church, slipped in their catechesis,
or willfully ignored some of its teachings on sexual issues (the
increasingly smaller number of children born to Catholic families is
empirical evidence of that)—their Catholicism may have always been a
self-defined identity rather than a strident one.
jayhanson |THE TRAGEDY OF THE COMMON REVISITED, by Beryl Crowe
(1969); reprinted in MANAGING THE COMMONS, by Garrett Hardin and John Baden
W.H. Freeman, 1977; ISBN 0-7167-0476-5
"There has developed in the contemporary natural
sciences a recognition that there is a subset of problems, such as population,
atomic war, and environmental corruption, for which there are no technical
solutions.
"There is also an increasing recognition among
contemporary social scientists that there is a subset of problems, such as
population, atomic war, environmental corruption, and the recovery of a livable
urban environment, for which there are no current political solutions. The
thesis of this article is that the common area shared by these two subsets
contains most of the critical problems that threaten the very existence of
contemporary man." [p. 53]
ASSUMPTIONS
NECESSARY TO AVOID THE TRAGEDY
"In passing the technically insoluble problems over to
the political and social realm for solution, Hardin made three critical
assumptions:
a. that there exists, or can be developed, a
'criterion of judgment and system of weighting . . .' that will 'render the
incommensurables . . . commensurable . . . ' in real life;
b. that, possessing this criterion of judgment,
'coercion can be mutually agreed upon,' and that the application of coercion to
effect a solution to problems will be effective in modern society; and
c. that the administrative system, supported by the
criterion of judgment and access to coercion, can and will protect the commons
from further desecration." [p. 55]
ERODING MYTH OF
THE COMMON VALUE SYSTEM
"In America there existed, until very recently, a set
of conditions which perhaps made the solution to Hardin's subset possible; we
lived with the myth that we were 'one people, indivisible. . . .' This myth
postulated that we were the great 'melting pot' of the world wherein the
diverse cultural ores of Europe were poured into the crucible of the frontier
experience to produce a new alloy -- an American civilization. This new
civilization was presumably united by a common value system that was
democratic, equalitarian, and existing under universally enforceable rules
contained in the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.
"In the United States today, however, there is emerging
a new set of behavior patterns which suggest that the myth is either dead or
dying. Instead of believing and behaving in accordance with the myth, large
sectors of the population are developing life-styles and value hierarchies that
give contemporary Americans an appearance more closely analogous to the
particularistic, primitive forms of 'tribal' organizations in geographic
proximity than to that shining new alloy, the American civilization." [p.
56]
"Looking at a more recent analysis of the sickness of
the core city, Wallace F. Smith has argued that the productive model of the
city is no longer viable for the purposes of economic analysis. Instead, he
develops a model of the city as a site for leisure consumption, and then seems
to suggest that the nature of this model is such is such that the city cannot
regain its health because the leisure demands are value-based and, hence do not
admit to compromise and accommodation; consequently there is no way of deciding
among these value- oriented demands that are being made on the core city.
"In looking for the cause of the erosion of the myth of
a common value system, it seems to me that so long as our perceptions and
knowledge of other groups were formed largely through the written media of
communication, the American myth that we were a giant melting pot of
equalitarians could be sustained. In such a perceptual field it is tenable, if
not obvious, that men are motivated by interests. Interests can always be
compromised and accommodated without undermining our very being by sacrificing
values. Under the impact of electronic media, however, this psychological
distance has broken down and now we discover that these people with whom we
could formerly compromise on interests are not, after all, really motivated by
interests but by values. Their behavior in our very living room betrays a set
of values, moreover, that are incompatible with our own, and consequently the
compromises that we make are not those of contract but of culture. While the
former are acceptable, any form of compromise on the latter is not a form of
rational behavior but is rather a clear case of either apostasy or heresy. Thus
we have arrived not at an age of accommodation but one of confrontation. In
such an age 'incommensurables' remain 'incommensurable' in real life." [p.
59]
EROSION OF THE
MYTH OF THE MONOPOLY OF COERCIVE FORCE
"In the past, those who no longer subscribed to the
values of the dominant culture were held in check by the myth that the state
possessed a monopoly on coercive force. This myth has undergone continual
erosion since the end of World War II owing to the success of the strategy of guerrilla
warfare, as first revealed to the French in Indochina, and later conclusively
demonstrated in Algeria. Suffering as we do from what Senator Fulbright has
called 'the arrogance of power,' we have been extremely slow to learn the
lesson in Vietnam, although we now realize that war is political and cannot be
won by military means. It is apparent that the myth of the monopoly of coercive
force as it was first qualified in the civil rights conflict in the South, then
in our urban ghettos, next on the streets of Chicago, and now on our college
campuses has lost its hold over the minds of Americans. The technology of
guerrilla warfare has made it evident that, while the state can win battles, it
cannot win wars of values. Coercive force which is centered in the modern state
cannot be sustained in the face of the active resistance of some 10 percent of
the population unless the state is willing to embark on a deliberate policy of
genocide directed against the value dissident groups. The factor that sustained
the myth of coercive force in the past was the acceptance of a common value
system. Whether the latter exists is questionable in the modern
nation-state." [pp. 59-60]
EROSION OF THE
MYTH OF ADMINISTRATORS OF THE COMMONS
"Indeed, the process has been so widely commented upon
that one writer postulated a common life cycle for all of the attempts to
develop regulatory policies. The life cycle is launched by an outcry so
widespread and demanding that it generates enough political force to bring
about establishment of a regulatory agency to insure the equitable, just, and
rational distribution of the advantages among all holders of interest in the
commons. This phase is followed by the symbolic reassurance of the offended as
the agency goes into operation, developing a period of political quiescence
among the great majority of those who hold a general but unorganized interest
in the commons. Once this political quiescence has developed, the highly
organized and specifically interested groups who wish to make incursions into
the commons bring sufficient pressure to bear through other political processes
to convert the agency to the protection and furthering of their interests. In
the last phase even staffing of the regulating agency is accomplished by
drawing the agency administrators from the ranks of the regulated." [pp.
60-61].
Begrudgingly Acknowledged Country Bangers
-
When someone says they hate country music, they’re typically referring,
whether they know it or not, to the neotraditionalist “young country” that
arose in...
A Foundation of Joy
-
Two years and I've lost count of how many times my eye has been operated
on, either beating the fuck out of the tumor, or reattaching that slippery
eel ...
April Three
-
4/3
43
When 1 = A and 26 = Z
March = 43
What day?
4 to the power of 3 is 64
64th day is March 5
My birthday
March also has 5 letters.
4 x 3 = 12
...
Return of the Magi
-
Lately, the Holy Spirit is in the air. Emotional energy is swirling out of
the earth.I can feel it bubbling up, effervescing and evaporating around
us, s...
New Travels
-
Haven’t published on the Blog in quite a while. I at least part have been
immersed in the area of writing books. My focus is on Science Fiction an
Historic...
Covid-19 Preys Upon The Elderly And The Obese
-
sciencemag | This spring, after days of flulike symptoms and fever, a man
arrived at the emergency room at the University of Vermont Medical Center.
He ...