medium | “I’ve
seen the classified report,” Nelson told CNN’s Pamela Brown in an
interview shortly before the June 25th “Preliminary Report on UAP” came
out. “It says basically what we thought. We don’t know the answer to
what those Navy pilots saw.”
“Now,
they know that they saw something. They tracked it. They locked their
radar onto it. They followed it. It would suddenly move quickly from one
location to another. And what the report does tell us that is public is
that there have been over 140 of these sightings, So, naturally, what I
ask our scientists to do is to see if there’s any kind of explanation
from a scientific point of view and I’m awaiting their report.”
This
summer NASA press secretary Jackie McGuinness confirmed her new boss
Nelson had directed researchers to move forward with exploring any lines
of questioning around the topic as they see fit.
“There’s
not really a lot of data and scientists should be free to follow these
leads, and it shouldn’t be stigmatized,” McGuinness said, acknowledging
that UFO research can be negatively associated with unfounded conspiracy
theories. “This is a really interesting phenomenon and Americans are
clearly interested in it so if the scientists want to investigate, they
should.”
This
is great news for large numbers of scientists who have been frustrated
about attempts to get research started because of the stigma the topic
generates. The idea that NASA itself is willing to authorize, support
and coordinate such work is revolutionary.
What Questions Did He Ask Again?
Now
you read it in the earlier breakout quote in this article, but in one
of his responses Nelson asked a series of questions. Let’s give them a
little more breathing space as we wrap up here:
What, who is out there?
Who are we?
How did we get here?
How did we become as we are?
How did we develop?
How did we civilize?
It’s worth considering that these are not the first things a public official is likely to say when questioned about the June 25 Preliminary Assessement: Undentified Aerial Phenomena,
is it? On the other hand, we know he has had the Full Monty of the
classified briefing, and probably others. We also know that if Joe Biden
wants to know what the hell is going on, he’s apt to call up Bill
Nelson.
Still,
it sure sounds like Nelson seems to be saying something with a little
more complexity than the version of human development we get taught in
high school and college. He’s asking questions that make it seem like we
had help.
Why Is He Talking Like This?
It
seems the main reason is that he believes it. That, of course, would be
refreshing and illuminating and, from what I’ve read, seen and heard,
it appears to be the truth.
But
it may also be that his age has something to do with it. Nelson turned
79 this year. He was born in World War II, fought in Vietnam, had a
lifetime of experiences that many of us will never have. He knows in his
heart that something strange is going on now, and has been for the
entire time he’s been on this Earth.
He seems ready to play his part now by saying the quiet part out loud.
Keep
it coming, Bill. Turn your teams loose on this. Tell them they can
speak truth to power. Find out some answers. Confirm what you can and
offer the best theories and interpretations that can be made about the
explanations. We’ve all been waiting a long time, too.
medium |After
Congress was briefed on the classified portion of the Pentagon’s UAP
report in June, D.C. power player and scientist Robert McGwier
participated in a panel discussion on the Canadian UFO and paranormal
radio program Spaced Out Radio and said he’d heard from an acquaintance in the closed-door session.
The briefing, he said, included the National Security Council
and members of Congress — just how many of the latter, it wasn’t clear
from McGwier’s off-air remarks during one of the show’s breaks, which
are live-streamed on YouTube
while radio listeners hear commercials. This elite audience of
Washington power brokers was privy to information that has not been
publicly released.
“Seventy
pages and 14 videos,” he said. “They got to see the good stuff.” Later
in the program, he added a caveat: “I want to make very, very clear: I
heard no classified information whatsoever.”
McGwier, affectionately known as “Bob the Science Guy,” is an academic and active member of the ufology community.
An expert in radio technology with a Ph.D in applied mathematics from Brown University, he joined the Institute for Defense Analyses Center for Communications Research,
a non-profit think tank in Princeton, N.J. in 1986. When he was hired
in 2011 to head a research center at Virginia Tech, the school noted
that McGwier’s work with the U.S. government had earned him the
intelligence community’s “highest honor” in 2002. His job at Virginia
Tech, according to the school, was to “develop strategic research
relationships within the industry and government working in the national
security sector.”
Put another way, he has connections in Washington D.C. McGwier continued:
“I
know several people who were in the National Security Council meeting,”
he said. “The best comment I heard was, ‘What we had was 40 minutes of
science fiction movies. We were all gobsmacked.’
Which
is to say, 40 minutes of video of UAPs doing their thing out over the
ocean, running circles around U.S. Navy aircraft carriers and fighter
pilots, whatever it is they do out there. Not fiction, but actual reality.
Imagine
video, then, that gives you the palpable feeling of shit getting
unnervingly real, of the world shifting beneath your feet. It’s what the
American philosopher and physicist Thomas Kuhn called in his 1962 book TheStructure of Scientific Revolutions
a “paradigm shift,” or what philosophy and religious studies professor
Jeffrey Kripal calls “the flip.” Out with the old, in with the new — and
the woo.
Make no mistake: The videos we’ve already seen, acquired and published by the New York Times (and those reportedly leaked and subsequently dribbled out by ufologist and filmmaker Jeremy Corbell)
are extraordinary, game-changing documents. They are, at this point,
probably the most famous “authentic” UFO videos ever seen by the public.
Future books on the topic will probably feature images from these
videos the way UFO books published during the 1970s and ’80s included
the famous Trent photos from McMinnville.
the-sun | AMAZON billionaire Jeff Bezos’ space mission was met with ridicule
yesterday — because people think his rocket is shaped like a giant
todger.
Online jokers poked fun at the Blue Origin New Shepard craft, which will shoot him 60 miles above the Earth.
One said: “That rocket looks like a big willy.”
Another said: “Is it me, or does Jeff Bezos’ rocket look like a giant penis?”
And one quipped: “It’s basically a giant flaming space dildo.”
Bezos, 57 — worth £186billion — and his brother Mark, 53, will be on
the rocket’s first crewed flight on July 20, 15 days after he steps down
as Amazon boss.
The 11-minute mission will see the six-seater capsule soar above the Earth.
One seat is being auctioned, with bidding topping £2million.
medium | Anyhow,
I got a call from one of the Directors who said, “I happen to be out
here for something — you’re not going home yet, you’re going to meet me
at the Air Force station tomorrow for lunch over by the Aerospace
Corporation on Sepulveda. Maybe you’ll make it home by Monday — we’ll
see.”
So
I show up for lunch over at the Air Force station, and Harold Ostroff
was sitting down at this table with a big group of military &
civilian guys in business suits, and as I walked up to the table, he
turns to the other guys sitting there and says, “I’d like to introduce
you all to the new head of McDonnell’s Advanced Aerospace Program.”
Anyhow, I didn’t know anything about this beforehand, and when he said
it I looked around a bit for the person he was talking about — and after
a second I guess that it finally sunk in that he was talking about me.
So
that was how I found out about it — I had a deputy program manager from
Huntington Beach, and there was a group there from Aerojet — Don
Kissinger, Mike Hamel, and Ron Samborski — that were there to talk about
the air-turbo ramjet work that they’d patented back in 1946.
I
went out to Aerojet the next couple of days for briefings on their
engine designs, and when I came back home, we did a proposal for the Air
Force TAV program, but the main thrust was a proposal that we put
together with the people from Huntington Beach on a 2-stage to orbit
vehicle. The first stage would fly with air-turbo ramjets to about Mach 6
or 7, and then it would stage with a scramjet vehicle a rocket that
would deploy up into orbit.
We
had several different concepts for this, depending on how soon we
wanted we wanted the thing to fly. One of the people out at Huntington
Beach named Joe Shergi had a concept for what he called a “toss-back
booster”, that looked like an Apollo capsule with engines mounted in
what looked like the heat-shield. After you separated the upper-stage,
this thing would turn around and retrofire to toss back to the launch
site, making everything recoverable.
We
had 2 or 3 concepts that we were briefing as 2-stage to orbit vehicles.
The first one that we could build quickly, based on all the hardware
that was available, was a hypersonic FDL-7C glider on top of a toss-back
booster. Then we went to an air-turbo ramjet first stage which went to
about Mach 7 to 8, and later we went to a scramjet first stage that went
to about Mach 12.
We
hired a guy named Larry Fogel from the Titan Corporation, and he
actually toured all of the SAC bases that had operational B-52 squadrons
and asked them what they would do if they had one of these NASP
vehicles — how they use it, maintain it, and stuff like that. We built
an entire database on what the Strategic Air Command estimated these
vehicles would cost to operate. We’d given them all the numbers that we
had at the outset — how much thrust we had, how much propellant we
needed, how many times the engines could be re-used, etc — and they gave
us back operational cost estimates compared to a traditional B-52
squadron. It was quite interesting…
We
took this information and used it for briefings in Washington DC, which
is where I met Scotty Crossfield, who was working with Dan Glickman —
and what we ended up with was the first stage vehicle, which was a
large, Mach-6 vehicle. This led to the development of a prototype that
we created as a demonstrator to validate the technology.
So
the prototype was built to show how the NASP vehicle could fulfill 3
primary mission roles. The first was simply as a Mach-6 transport for
passengers, the second was a Mach-8 strategic strike-aircraft for the
Air Force, and the third involved combining the vehicle with an
upper-stage rocket to go into Low-Earth Orbit.
It sounds like this technology really blurs the line between an aircraft and the Space-Shuttle or maybe even a true spacecraft…
Well
the shuttle’s not an aircraft — it’s an abortion trying to figure out
how to fly. You never want to build a vehicle that looks like that. The
best vehicles ever designed came out of the Air Force Flight-Dynamics
Lab, and Draper made one huge effort to try and get NASA to listen, and
they absolutely refused to take his advice.
From
the beginning, NASA had their own ideas about bluntness and all sorts
of crazy design ideas that ended up in the Shuttle. The real hypersonic
vehicles that were inherently stable — from Mach 22 all the way down to
zero, and had thermal protection systems already worked out — were
simply discarded.
These
weren’t new ideas, even when the Shuttle was being designed. The
Department of Defense was involved with this between ’58 and ’68, and
they were discarded because the President at that time decided that no
military systems would enter orbit. The administration was deathly
afraid back then of militarizing space, which meant that everything
going into space had to be civilian, so NASA took over everything.
The
Air Force has something called the XLR-129 — it’s in a book that one of
the Pratt & Whitney guys wrote that you can buy from the Society of
Automotive Engineers library. The XLR-129 had about 580,000 pounds of
thrust from a LOX-hydrogen engine and 3,500 psi chamber pressure.
It
was fired 40 times without any overhaul, and it was brought up to
full-power in about 3.5 months — whereas the Space Shuttle Main Engine
(SSME) took about 38 months to come up to full-power.
This
very same XLR-129 engine was donated to NASA when the Air Force got out
of the space-race. The plans, the engine, and everything related to it
were destroyed, and the last sentence in that chapter in Pratt’s book
says, “NASA destroyed all of this because they didn’t want to embarrass
their present engine contractor.”
Given
the issues that NASA’s having with the Shuttle Program at the moment,
do you think that they may someday return to this type of hardware for a
next-generation Shuttle design?
One
of Reagan’s assistant secretaries of commerce — for innovation,
technology, and productivity — was named D. Bruce Merrifield, and he was
very Russian in his thinking. The Russians have prototype factories
that take laboratory ideas, and translate them into something that can
be used in a functional, operational piece of hardware.
Merrifield’s
concept was that the deficiency in the United States is that it uses
projects to prepare technologies for application, which doesn’t give the
new technologies adequate time to properly mature. He always advocated
that just like with baseball players, technology needs a “farm team” to
develop it so that it can later be used functionally. The Japanese do
this, the Russians used to do this, and they do it because it produces
great results.
What
we were doing when I was at McDonnell-Douglas — because “Old-Man Mac”
was a hardware guy — was looking at how you could take these big ideas
and build samples & prototypes out of them, to see if we could come
out of this with an operational concept.
When
we designed a Mach-6 aircraft, we didn’t follow NASA’s strategy of
building a research and develop vehicle that could only be flown 3 times
a year. What we developed were vehicles that were operationally
functional as much as a B-52 is.
Our
resupply vehicle in 1964 for the manned orbiting laboratory had 11
operational vehicles and 3 spares — and those 11 vehicles flew 100 times
a year for 15 years. That’s 1964 industrial capability — no magic at
all. I don’t need magic. Now compare that to the Shuttle.
caitlinjohnstone | In the summer of 1950, four nuclear physicists were walking to lunch
from the Los Alamos National Laboratory in New Mexico. Their names were
Emil Konopinski, Herbert York, Edward Teller, and Enrico Fermi.
One of them was not human.
On
the walk the four discussed science, because science is what they
always discussed. It's what they lived, it's what they thought about,
it's what they ate, slept and breathed. On this particular occasion they
discussed the recent spate of reports about flying saucers, and whether
or not an alien civilization could hypothetically have discovered how
to travel faster than the speed of light.
Once they arrived at the
Fuller Lodge for their meal their intense conversation was interrupted
by the mundane activities of finding seats and ordering their food.
After a brief pause, Fermi's thick Italian accent broke the silence with
a question that would later become famous.
"But where is everybody?" he asked loudly.
The
way he phrased it caused the other three to burst out laughing; they
immediately understood that he was asking, in his own inimitable way,
why no signs of extraterrestrial life had been discovered.
They
listened with rapt attention as Fermi's luminous mind rapidly dissected
the sheer mathematical improbability of humanity being the only
intelligent life in this galaxy, let alone the entire universe, given
the sheer number of stars and the likelihood that at least a small
percentage of them would have habitable planets capable of giving rise
to life. This question, and the peculiar exclamation with which it was
first expressed, would go on to be known as the Fermi paradox.
The
scientists joyfully batted around ideas with the Italian "pope of
physics", then finished their meal, returned to the laboratory, and they
each went their separate ways.
Fermi worked late, as such rare
geniuses often do. Out there in the world with small talk, politics,
family and teenaged children, it was difficult to really feel at ease.
But in the world of scientific adventure, discoveries and breakthroughs,
he always felt in command.
The sunlight had long gone and the lab
had gone still, and Fermi was scribbling away in his office, when there
was a knock at the door. It gave Fermi a start; nobody ever interrupted
him at this hour, that's what he liked about it.
"What is it?" he asked in irritation.
The door opened. It was York.
"Hi," York said.
"York," Fermi replied.
"Can I come in?"
"Yes, yes come in."
York closed the door.
"So," he said. "Do you want to know?"
"Want to know what?"
"Do you want an answer to the question you asked at lunch?"
The Research
and Technology Protection Program wants everyone to know that aliens ARE
real. The UFO’s on FLIR are totally NOT a subsurface maritime-launched
UAV. The US DOESN'T have those, but if they did, the Navy might want to
introduce them without
breaking the law on special access programs. Hypothetically, such limited hangouts could force adversaries to
re-think their combat doctrine, potentially delaying future offensives in the South
China Sea. There is nothing like spending a ton on wunderwaffen to
plant a kernel of doubt in your adversaries, and convince yourself that conflict is anything but a crapshoot.
robbreport | It might be an exaggeration to say BioViva
CEO Liz Parrish believes death is optional, but for her, Asprey’s goal
of living to 180 shows a distinct lack of ambition. “If you can reach
homeostasis in the body,” Parrish says, “where it’s regenerating itself
just a little bit faster than it’s degrading, then what do you die of?
An accident or natural disaster, probably. There’s no expiration date at
90 or 100 years old.”
Tall, blond and fit, Parrish cuts a strikingly youthful figure at
49—one that might convince you to order whatever she’s having. But, like
Asprey, she has received criticism from the longevity research
community for becoming “patient zero” in her own experimental drug
trial, aimed at halting aging at the cellular level. In 2015, Parrish
underwent telomerase and follistatin gene therapies in Bogotá,
Colombia. The procedures involved receiving around a hundred injections
of a cocktail of genes and a virus modified to deliver those new genes
into her body’s cells. The objective was to prevent age-related muscle
loss and lengthen her telomeres: the “caps” at the end of our
chromosomes. Scientists have identified their unraveling as not only a
marker of aging but also a potential cause of age-related decline.
Parrish told the media about her clandestine experiment and has
published periodic updates on her condition in the five years since, and
she reports that she has indeed increased her muscle mass and
lengthened her telomeres. Parrish’s punk-rock approach stems from her
conviction that the medical-research community—both the Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) and researchers who aren’t business-minded—is
moving too slowly, with too much red tape, when it comes to advancing
aging therapeutics. But gene therapy is a relatively new area of
medicine that brings with it a host of new risks, including cancer,
severe immune reactions and infections caused by the viral vector used
to deliver the drug.
Parrish downplays such worries. “There may be risks,” she tells Robb Report.
“But the known risk is that you’re 100 percent likely to die. So you
have to decide for yourself if the potential benefit outweighs that.”
Humans have always aspired to find the fountain of youth, so people
might be skeptical about the fact that anti-aging technologies are
working now,” says British investor and businessman Jim Mellon. “But the
fact is that this is finally happening, and we need to seize the
moment.” Mellon cofounded Juvenescence,
a three-year-old pharmaceutical company that’s investing in multiple
technologies simultaneously to increase the odds of bringing winning
products to market.
Mellon, 63, has made his fortune betting on well-timed investment
opportunities, and he predicts that a new “stock-market mania” for life
extension is just around the corner. “This is like the internet dial-up
phase of longevity biotech,” he enthuses. “If you’d invested in the
internet in the very early days, you’d be one of the richest people on
the planet. We’re at that stage now, so the opportunity for investors is
huge.” According to a report by Bank of America Merrill Lynch, he’s not
wrong: The market for technologies to increase human life span is
projected to grow sixfold to $610 billion in just the next five years.
lifespan | Back in 2005, Drs. Irina and Michael
Conboy showed that joining the circulatory systems of young and old mice
together in a procedure called parabiosis could rejuvenate aged tissues
and reverse some aspects of aging in old mice.
Following this discovery, many
researchers concluded that there must be something special in young
blood that was able to spur rejuvenation in aged animals, and various
companies have been trying to find out what. Indeed, we recently
reported that researchers were apparently successful in halving the epigenetic age of old rats by treating them with Elixir, a proprietary mix of pro-youthful factors normally found in young blood.
However, a question still remains: was
the rejuvenation the result of there being something beneficial in the
young blood, or is it more a case of dilution of the harmful factors
present in old blood?
Today, we want to spotlight a new study
by Drs. Irina and Michael Conboy, which again lends more weight to the
idea that the rejuvenation is most likely due to a dilution of pro-aging
factors in old blood rather than there being any special sauce in young
blood [1].
During the study, the research team
discovered that by replacing half of the blood plasma in old mice with a
saline and albumin mixture, the albumin replacing the lost protein that
was removed when the original old blood plasma was taken, they could
achieve a similar or even greater rejuvenation effect in brain, liver,
and muscle tissues as joining two mice together through parabiosis or
giving old mice young blood.
We had the opportunity to interview Drs.
Irina and Michael Conboy about this new discovery and to see if we
could get to the bottom of the mystery surrounding aged blood
rejuvenation.
Steve: This recent paper builds on the
2015 paper of TGF beta, but it goes even further back to the days when
you guys had a lab next door to Amy Wagers and Tony Wyss-Coray and you
all shared the techniques, including the parabiosis technique.
Irina: Yes. Actually, I would like also
to thank you, Elena, and the whole organization for highlighting our
work and giving us an opportunity to speak in interviews.
Steve: You are very welcome. So, is this
dilution? Is it what you put in that’s more important, is it what you
take out, or is it both? I personally think that the evidence strongly
suggests that it’s more what you take out, but that doesn’t necessarily
mean that there isn’t good stuff in young blood.
Irina: Since our 2005 heterochronic
parabiosis paper, many people jumped into this boat of young blood,
thinking that the reason for rejuvenation is that there are less young
factors in an old animal and we provided them. Meanwhile, all our work
even leading to that paper suggested the opposite outcome: that there
are excessive factors in old blood that are actually good proteins; for
example, TGF beta. You cannot live without TGF beta. But, when people
age, the levels of this protein become elevated, and they start doing
counterproductive things for tissue repair, induce inflammation,
increase fibrosis, and prevent proliferation of tissue stem cells. That
was our point of view for the past 15 years, and every single paper that
we published since was putting forward the general idea that it is not
the young blood, it is the old blood that needs thought and attention.
theintercept |Pfizer, Moderna, and other coronavirus vaccine makers have said repeatedly that they intend to hike prices on vaccines as early as this year, as the potential need for additional booster shots and future demand could lead to an unprecedented financial windfall. One estimate projects that if Pfizer raised the price of its coronavirus vaccine from $19.50 to $175 per dose, as one Pfizer executive recently suggested, and if every adult American were to take it, the cost would be $44.7 billion — nearly 10 percent of all U.S. drug spending.
But the federal government, which
funded crucial biomedical research to develop the patented messenger RNA
technology behind the leading Covid-19 vaccines, is on the verge of
eliminating a legal mechanism to control the prices of key medical
products, including vaccines.
Next week, the National Institute of
Standards and Technology, or NIST, will wrap up a comment period to
modify the rules governing the Bayh-Dole Act, a law that regulates the
transfer of federally funded inventions into commercial property. Under
the current interpretation of the law, the government may “march in” and
suspend the use of patents developed via government-funded inventions
if it determines that the products are excessively priced.
The rulemaking is the latest flashpoint
in a decades long battle to control drug prices. The drug industry has
fought successfully to prevent “march-in” rights in the past; the
government has never managed to exercise them. But over the last year, a
growing number of Republicans and Democrats, including newly appointed
Health and Human Services Secretary Xavier Beccera, have called for the
use of march-in rights to rein in drug prices.
This supposed leverage to control
prices — on coronavirus medications and dozens of other drugs whose
development relied heavily on government-backed research — would be gone
if the rule-change proceeds.
theburningplatform | What appears to be happening is the last dying gasps of an empire of debt
as it thrashes about using un-Constitutional means to control its
subjects, while injecting trillions of fiat dollars as an adrenaline
treatment for a terminal cancer diagnosis.
As a last resort, initiating a global war with Russia and China would
certainly distract the masses and keep them from realizing the true
enemy within. Turning Washington DC into an armed encampment is not to
protect the government from white supremacists. It is to protect the
traitorous creatures in Congress and the White House from the citizens
when this diabolical plan blows up in our faces.
Inflation is already raging, but the government and Fed tell you it is
1.5%. There are 261 million working age Americans and only 127 million
are employed full-time, but the government tells you the unemployment
rate is 6.2%, when more than 50% of those capable of working are not.
The government will tell you GDP soared in the first
quarter at 6%, when we are in the midst of a government created
Depression, and the GDP calculation is nothing more than the government
borrowing trillions from future generations and giving a minuscule
portion to current generations, with the vast majority going into the
pockets of billionaire oligarchs, Wall Street, and mega-corporations.
The “economic recovery” narrative is entirely false, but the jar shakers
know the plebs do not understand math.
The plumbing of our astonishingly crooked financial system began to
fail in September 2019, with overnight Repo rates soaring to 10%. The
Fed immediately leapt into action by restarting QE (aka No Banker Left
Behind) to keep the depth of our debt predicament hidden from the
public. A flu released from a Chinese bio-lab, which is highly
non-lethal to anyone under 80 years old, has been utilized by the jar
shakers to unleash a tsunami of digital fiat (aka debt) to prop up a system being smothered by too much debt.
Since March of 2020, our beloved legislators have added $4.5 trillion to the national debt,
a 20% increase in one year. The Fed has done their part by jolting
their balance sheet up by $3.5 trillion, an 85% increase in one year.
The current administration is saying hold my beer, as they are busy
adding another $4 trillion in the next year and the Fed will add another
$2 trillion or so to their balance sheet. Meanwhile, hundreds of
thousands of small businesses
have been permanently destroyed, while Bezos and the rest of his
billionaire buddies have increased their net worth by tens of billions.
At least your grandma is earning .015% in her savings account, while her
living expenses rise by 10%. Do you get it yet?
caitlinjohnstone | I
write about humanity’s problems as a species in all sorts of ways in
this space, but really if you want to get straightforward about things
all we’re ever actually talking about here is a lack of awareness of
what’s true and the need to eliminate that lack.
A
lack of awareness is the source of all our major problems, whether
we’re talking about war, poverty, ecocide, corruption, exploitation,
authoritarianism, prejudice, or even much smaller-scale problems like
abusive family dynamics or the psychological suffering of the
individual.
If there weresufficiently
widespread and penetrating awareness of the contributing factors in any
of these problems, these problems would cease to exist. All you’d have
left would be the odd natural disaster and the inevitability of sickness
and death, which would also become far less problematic with the
introduction of more awareness.
Yes,
from a certain point of view it is true and accurate to say that many
of our large-scale problems are due to the fact that humans whose brains
lack functioning empathy centers are most well-equipped to manipulate
their way into positions of power and influence, and that the amoral
nature of capitalism ensures that it will be dominated by those willing
to do whatever it takes to climb to the top. From a certain point of
view it is true and accurate to say that our problems are caused by the
fact that things like war, oppression, ecocide and exploitation will
necessarily continue as long as our world is dominated by a system where
those things are profitable and human behavior is driven by profit.
But it is also true that underlying every single part of the dynamics I just listed is a fundamental lack of human awareness.
scheerpost | What is taking place is not neglect. It is not
ineptitude. It is not policyfailure. It is murder. It is murder because
it is premeditated. It is murder because a conscious choice was made by
the global ruling classes to extinguish life rather than protect it. It
is murder because profit, despite the hard statistics, the growing
climate disruptions and the scientific modeling, is deemed more
important than human life and human survival.
The elites thrive in this system, as long as they serve the dictates
of what Lewis Mumford called the “megamachine,” the convergence of
science, economy, technics and political power unified into an
integrated, bureaucratic structure whose sole goal is to perpetuate
itself. This structure, Mumford noted, is antithetical to
“life-enhancing values.” But to challenge the megamachine, to name and
condemn its death wish, is to be expelled from its inner sanctum. There
are, no doubt, some within the megamachine who fear the future, who are
perhaps even appalled by the social murder, but they do not want to lose
their jobs and their social status to become pariahs.
The massive resources allocated to the military, which when the costs
of the Veterans Administration are added to the Department of Defense
budget come to $826 billion a year, are the most glaring example of our
suicidal folly, symptomatic of all decaying civilizations that squander
diminishing resources in institutions and projects that accelerate their
decline.
The American military — which accounts for 38 percent of military
spending worldwide — is incapable of combating the real existential
crisis. The fighter jets, satellites, aircraft carriers, fleets of
warships, nuclear submarines, missiles, tanks and vast arsenals of
weaponry are useless against pandemics and the climate crisis. The war
machine does nothing to mitigate the human suffering caused by degraded
environments that sicken and poison populations or make life
unsustainable. Air pollution already kills an estimated 200,000
Americans a year while children in decayed cities such as Flint,
Michigan are damaged for life with lead contamination from drinking
water.
The prosecution of endless and futile wars, costing anywhere from $5
to $7 trillion, the maintenance of some 800 military bases in over 70
countries, along with the endemic fraud, waste and mismanagement by the
Pentagon at a time when the survival of the species is at stake is
self-destructive. The Pentagon has spent more than $67 billion alone on
a ballistic missile defense system that few believe will actually work
and billions more on a series of dud weapons systems, including the $22
billion Zumwalt destroyer. And, on top of all this, the U.S. military
emitted 1.2 billion metric tons of carbon emissions between 2001 and
2017, twice the annual output of the nation’s passenger vehicles.
A decade from now we will look back at the current global ruling
class as the most criminal in human history, willfully dooming millions
upon millions of people to die, including those from this pandemic,
which dwarf the murderous excesses of the killers of the past including
the Europeans that carried out the genocide of the indigenous peoples in
the Americas, the Nazis that exterminated some 12 million people, the
Stalinists or Mao’s Cultural Revolution. This is the largest crime
against humanity ever committed. It is being committed in front of us.
And, with few exceptions, we are willfully being herded like sheep to
the slaughter.
It is not that most people have faith in the ruling elites. They know
they are being betrayed. They feel vulnerable and afraid. They
understand that their misery is unacknowledged and unimportant to the
global elites, who have concentrated staggering amounts of wealth and
power into the hands of a tiny cabal of rapacious oligarchs.
vice | Dr. Salvatore Cezar Pais is the man behind the patents and The War Zone
has proven the man exists, at least on paper. Pais has worked for a
number of different departments in the Navy, including the Naval Air
Warfare Center Aircraft Division (NAVAIR/NAWCAD) and the Strategic
Systems Programs. (SSP) The SSP mission, according to its website, is to
“provide credible and affordable strategic solutions to the
warfighter.” It’s responsible for developing the technology behind the
Trident class nuclear missiles launched from Submarines.
The patents all build on each other, but at their core is something Pais called the “Pais Effect.” This is the idea that,
“controlled motion of electrically charged matter via accelerated
vibration and/or accelerated spin subjected to smooth yet rapid
acceleration transients, in order to generate extremely high energy/high
intensity electromagnetic fields.”
Essentially,
Pais is claiming to use properly spun electromagnetic fields to contain
a fusion reaction. That plasma fusion reaction he claims to have
invented will revolutionize power consumption. Experts theorize that a functioning fusion reactor would lead to cheap and ubiquitous energy.
One of Pais and the Navy’s patents described what the propulsion system
and fusion drive would be used for—a “hybrid aerospace-underwater
craft.” According to the patent, the craft could travel land, sea, and
outer space at incredible speeds. Other patents invented by Pais and
filed by the Navy include a “high temperature superconductor,” a
“electromagnetic field generator,” and a “high frequency gravitational
wave generator.”
It
all sounds like science fiction, and the Navy has been skeptical too.
Navy authorities called bullshit on Pais’ inventions and his patents
went through a lengthy internal review at NAVAIR. The War Zone
obtained emails about the bureaucratic fight between Pais and the Navy
through a Freedom of Information Act Request and revealed that the mad scientist won. According to the patents, some of the technology is “operable.” That means the Navy is claiming some of Pais’ wild tech works and has been demonstrated to Navy officials.
The
physics of what Pais is claiming are beyond theoretical and beyond the
ken of the layman or lowly science reporter. But a paper about his
compaction fusion reactor was accepted by the peer reviewed Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Transactions on Plasma Science and published in its November 2019 issue.
“The fact that my work on the design of a Compact Fusion Reactor was
accepted for publication in such a prestigious journal as IEEE TPS,
should speak volumes as to its importance and credibility - and should
eliminate (or at least alleviate) all misconceptions you (or any other
person) may have in regard to the veracity (or possibility) of my
advanced physics concepts,” Pais told The War Zone in an email.
Pais
continued to toot his own plasma horn. “Do realize that my work
culminates in the enablement of the Pais Effect (original physical
concept),” he said. “Such high energy [electromagnetic] radiation can
locally interact with the Vacuum Energy State (VES) - the VES being the
Fifth State of Matter (Fifth Essence - Quintessence), in other words the
fundamental structure (foundational framework), from which Everything
else (Spacetime included) in our Quantum Reality, emerges. The
Engineering of the Pais Effect can give rise to the Enablement of
Macroscopic Quantum Coherence, which if you have closely been following
my work, you understand the importance of.”
NASA |
ABSTRACT - A new propulsion concept has been developed based on a
proposed resonance between coherent, pulsed electromagnetic wave forms
and gravitational wave forms (or space-time metrics). Using this
concept, a spacecraft "propulsion" system potentially capable of
galactic and inter-galactic travel without prohibitive "travel times"
has been designed. The "propulsion" system utilizes recent research
associated with magnetic field line merging, hydromagnetic wave effects,
free-electron lasers, laser generation of megagauss fields, and special
structural and containment metals. Research required to determine
potential, field resonance characteristics and to evaluate various
aspects of the spacecraft "propulsion" design is described.
ASSUMPTIONS The
field resonance "propulsion" concept has been developed utilizing
recent research into causes of solar flares, magnetic substorms, black
holes, quasars, and UFOs. The concept is based on two assumptions:
(1) Space-time is a "projection" of a higher dimensional space in
much the same way that a hologram is a projection or a subset of our
space-time reality, (2) A relationship exists between
electromagnetic / hydromagnetic fields and gravitational fields - that
is, Einstein's long sought for unified field theory can be developed.
Mathematical relationships have been developed and theoretical concepts
have been proposed to describe the causes and effects associated with
the assumptions, but experimental data is required to develop the
correct theoretical basis for the assumptions (Rachman and Dutheil,
1979). Specific research in a number of areas is needed and will be
described later.
ASTROPHYSICAL RESEARCH There does exist, however, some astrophysical data which tends to support these assumptions.
For
example, astronomers have speculated that a relationship may exist
between black holes and quasars (white holes). The energy and matter
which leaves space-time in a black hole may reappear at a white hole at
some distant space-time point. For this transfer of energy from one
space-time point to another to occur, some type of hyperspace or higher
dimensional space (4th & 5th) is required. Assumption 2 may be the
cause of the large amount of energy released in solar flairs. In
sunspot regions where solar flairs occur, the 2-3 thousand gauss
magnetic fields are configured such that the positive and negative
polarities are in close proximity with each other. Where the positive
and negative magnetic field lines are nearly anti-parallel a process
called magnetic field line merging can take place.
In this
process the oppositely directed field lines break and re-connect
expelling fields and plasma out from the sides. As a result magnetic
energy is converted into kinetic energy.
The magnetic field line
merging process has been proposed as the most likely explanation for
solar flare eruptions. However, some flares can release energy which
equals 10% of the suns' total output in a second. This large amount of
energy is difficult to achieve with the magnetic field line merging
concept.
Thus it may be that the configuration of the magnetic
fields and associated hydromagnetic waves (oscillation of field lines)
may induce a "resonance" with gravitational fields resulting in a
release of gravitational as well as magnetic energy.
It is well
known that the geometrical relationships of the magnetic fields (and
thus the field gradients) are more important to the production of solar
flairs than the magnitude of the field strength.
A strongly
convoluted boundary between magnetic polarities results in a high
probability for large and frequent flares. Another fact of interest is
that hydromagnetic waves generated by solar flare have been observed to
propagate across the chromospheric surface and trigger flares in other
sun spot regions.
Alfven waves, which appear to be the dominant
wave form involved, change only the geometry of the field lines. This
effect also indicates that the initiation of solar flares definitely
depends on geometrical relationships as do the properties of space-time
and gravitational fields.
Magnetic field line merging has also
been used to explain the interaction of the solar wind (and associated
fields) with the Earth's magnetic fields at the magnetopause and the
generation of magnetic substorms which often are triggered by solar
flairs.
The magnetic fields line merging process is also an essential part of the field resonance "propulsion" concept.
summit |An academic study carried out by researchers in the US and
Germany has concluded that big-tech elites are completely different to
all other people on the planet, and can be placed in their own class.
“Our research contributes to closing a research gap in societies with rising inequalities,” note the authors of the study from two German universities and the Ralph Bunche Institute for International Studies in New York.
The research
centres around analysing language used in close to 50,000 tweets and
other online statements by 100 of the richest tech-elites as listed by
Forbes.
The researchers conclude that big-tech elites such as Mark Zuckerberg and Bill Gates
display a ‘meritocratic’ worldview, meaning they do not see wealth as a
source of their influence or success, but rather believe their innate
abilities and more altruistic beliefs have enabled them to achieve
power.
“We find that the 100 richest members of the tech world reveal
distinctive attitudes that set them apart both from the general
population and from other wealthy elites,” the study states.
The researchers noted that the study had limitations, ironically
owing to the fact that they were not able to access language used by all
the top 100 tech-elites because Twitter is banned in China.
The Twitter accounts they were able to access could also be managed
by PR professionals and are obviously public projections of how the tech
elites want to be thought of by the public at large, therefore the
language used may be ‘strategic’.
Nevertheless, the findings go some way to explaining why big-tech elites are so inclined to censor and de-platform those who hold world views at odds with their own.
The emergence of a new tech elite in Silicon Valley and beyond raises
questions about the economic reach, political influence, and social
importance of this group. How do these inordinately influential people
think about the world and about our common future? In this paper, we
test a) whether members of the tech elite share a common, meritocratic
view of the world, b) whether they have a “mission” for the future, and
c) how they view democracy as a political system. Our data set consists
of information about the 100 richest people in the tech world, according
to Forbes, and rests on their published pronouncements on Twitter, as
well as on their statements on the websites of their philanthropic
endeavors. Automated “bag-of-words” text and sentiment analyses reveal
that the tech elite has a more meritocratic view of the world than the
general US Twitter-using population. The tech elite also frequently
promise to “make the world a better place,” but they do not differ from
other extremely wealthy people in this respect. However, their
relationship to democracy is contradictory. Based on these results, we
conclude that the tech elite may be thought of as a “class for itself”
in Marx’s sense—a social group that shares particular views of the
world, which in this case means meritocratic, missionary, and
inconsistent democratic ideology.
tomluongo | I feel a lot like Amos right now finally realizing I’m walking
through a post-civilizational landscape where everything looks normal
but it isn’t. In his case violent Communists from the fringe of the
solar system dropped asteroids on Earth.
For him this was a step-function change. But for many in our world
the changes happening aren’t quite so profound yet. The lights are
still on, there’s still food in a lot of our fridges.
It looks from where I’m sitting, the markets haven’t woken up to
these changes yet. Because of the size and scope of the changes, and
just how much of their valuation is a reflection of the false
information being fed into them by stupid AI algorithms, the speed at
which this realization is happening is far slower than we want to admit.
Normalcy bias is real. Markets never want to believe that cooler
heads won’t prevail, because they always have before. But what happens
when someone drops a rock from space on us, metaphorically?
If you’re a fan of The Expanse (and if you aren’t you should be) you’ll be familiar with the term The Churn. The Churn is the controlling idea for Amos Burton, whose only defining ethos is survival.
Simply put, The Churn is that moment when, “the rules of the game change.” Which game?
Amos: The only game. Survival. When the jungle tears itself down and builds itself into something new. Guys
like you and me, we end up dead. Doesn’t really mean anything. Or, if
we happen to live through it, well that doesn’t mean anything either.
Embedded in Amos’ idea of The Churn, however, is that while
the rules change society itself keeps on keeping on. So many people
right now are trying to analyze the political situation in terms of The Churn, the normal ebb and flow of who has the upper hand in the power struggle.
voxeu | It is a well-documented fact that top-income growth has been
particularly stark in English-speaking countries, with incomes of the
top 1% and 0.1% rising sharply over recent decades (Atkinson et al.
2011, Blanchet et al. 2019). Some scholars have argued that the shared
economic and political institutions of these countries, such as lower
top marginal tax rates and light touch regulation, have incentivised
rent-seeking behaviour among their top earners (Piketty et al. 2011,
Bivens and Mishel 2013). In addition, technical changes may have created
‘winner-takes-all’ markets where a few workers earn most of the
returns. Recent technological innovations may thus have contributed to
the rise of top incomes (Rosen 1981, Kaplan and Rauh 2013, Koenig 2020).
Another characteristic feature of Anglo-Saxon countries is their
popularity as a destination for high-skilled migrants, particularly the
cities that serve as global services hubs such as London and New York
(Kerr et al. 2016, Kerr and Kerr 2018, Roarch et al. 2019). Anecdotal
evidence suggests that the rich and famous are internationally mobile
and favour these destinations, but this evidence is based on a few
highly visible cases. So far, we know little about the magnitude of
these effects and the extent to which migration-induced selection
effects could drive different trends in income inequality across
countries and periods.
In a new paper (Advani et al. 2020), we combine top-income records
from UK tax records with new information about migrant status to analyse
the link. Tax records have been instrumental in recent research on top
incomes. These data provide improved coverage of the highest incomes
(reviewed in Atkinson et al. 2011); however, the data include minimal
information on demographic characteristics. As a result, it has been
difficult for researchers to distinguish native workers from migrant
workers at the top of the income distribution, or to assess the impact
of migration between countries on income dynamics. We derive information
on migrant status from the structure of Social Security numbers
assigned to migrant workers on arrival.
Our findings suggest that migrants are highly represented at the top
of the income distribution. The public debate primarily focuses on
low-income migrants; however, migrants make up a higher proportion of
earners at the very top of the income distribution. Among low-income
groups, about one in six people are immigrants. In contrast, among the
top percentile of the income distribution, one in four people are
immigrants and at higher fractiles, every third person is an immigrant. A
lack of data has created a perception that migration is mainly a
low-income phenomenon, but these new data show that the economy relies
most heavily on immigrants for extremely highly paid positions.
The inflow of high-income migrants can also help in understanding
recent trends in top incomes. In the UK, an inflow of high-income
finance workers can account for much of the observed rise in top-income
shares over the past two decades. Immigrants make up more than a quarter
of the top percentiles’ income share, up from 18% in 1997. Over these
two decades, the importance of migrants thus increased by 50%, which
accounts for about 85% of the rise in top income over this period
(Figure 1a).
The impact of migration is even starker at higher income levels.
Among the top 0.1% and 0.01% top, migrants make up roughly a third of UK
top incomes (Figure 1a). This pattern aligns closely with the observed
expansion of the wage distribution at the top. Incomes in the very top
fractiles of the income distribution have grown the fastest in recent
decades, pulling away even from the rapidly growing incomes in the lower
end of the top 1%. The data suggest that differential migration rates
can rationalise this ‘fractal inequality’. The inflow of migrants into
the top 0.01% was nearly twice as large as the comparable inflow into
the top 1% over the past two decades. Hence, differential migration
rates may have increased the gap between the incomes of the top 1% and
the top 0.1% (Figure 1b).
futurism | It’s not every day that we come across a paper that attempts to redefine reality.
But in a provocative preprint uploaded to arXiv
this summer, a physics professor at the University of Minnesota Duluth
named Vitaly Vanchurin attempts to reframe reality in a particularly
eye-opening way — suggesting that we’re living inside a massive neural
network that governs everything around us. In other words, he wrote in
the paper, it’s a “possibility that the entire universe on its most
fundamental level is a neural network.”
For years, physicists have attempted to reconcile
quantum mechanics and general relativity. The first posits that time is
universal and absolute, while the latter argues that time is relative,
linked to the fabric of space-time.
In his paper, Vanchurin argues
that artificial neural networks can “exhibit approximate behaviors” of
both universal theories. Since quantum mechanics “is a remarkably
successful paradigm for modeling physical phenomena on a wide range of
scales,” he writes, “it is widely believed that on the most fundamental
level the entire universe is governed by the rules of quantum mechanics
and even gravity should somehow emerge from it.”
“We are not just
saying that the artificial neural networks can be useful for analyzing
physical systems or for discovering physical laws, we are saying that
this is how the world around us actually works,” reads the paper’s
discussion. “With this respect it could be considered as a proposal for
the theory of everything, and as such it should be easy to prove it
wrong.”
The concept is so bold that most physicists and machine learning
experts we reached out to declined to comment on the record, citing
skepticism about the paper’s conclusions. But in a Q&A with
Futurism, Vanchurin leaned into the controversy — and told us more about
his idea.
Futurism: Your paper argues that the
universe might fundamentally be a neural network. How would you explain
your reasoning to someone who didn’t know very much about neural
networks or physics?
Vitaly Vanchurin: There are two ways to answer your question.
The
first way is to start with a precise model of neural networks and then
to study the behavior of the network in the limit of a large number of
neurons. What I have shown is that equations of quantum mechanics
describe pretty well the behavior of the system near equilibrium and
equations of classical mechanics describes pretty well how the system
further away from the equilibrium. Coincidence? May be, but as far as we
know quantum and classical mechanics is exactly how the physical world
works.
The second way is to start from physics. We know that quantum
mechanics works pretty well on small scales and general relativity works
pretty well on large scales, but so far we were not able to reconcile
the two theories in a unified framework. This is known as the problem of
quantum gravity. Clearly, we are missing something big, but to make
matters worse we do not even know how to handle observers. This is known
as the measurement problem in context of quantum mechanics and the
measure problem in context of cosmology.
Then one might argue that
there are not two, but three phenomena that need to be unified: quantum
mechanics, general relativity and observers. 99% of physicists would
tell you that quantum mechanics is the main one and everything else
should somehow emerge from it, but nobody knows exactly how that can be
done. In this paper I consider another possibility that a microscopic
neural network is the fundamental structure and everything else, i.e.
quantum mechanics, general relativity and macroscopic observers, emerges
from it.
The
lava tubes beneath the surface of the moon have also remained largely
intact due to low gravity. Any collapsed lava tubes on the moon are
likely due to asteroid impacts, the researchers said. And those
skylights could actually provide access to the tubes.
These lava tubes could help shelter astronauts, as well as provide new information about the moon and Mars.
"The
existence of stable huge voids below the Moon subsurface, potentially
accessible through skylights, could change the paradigm on how we
approach planetary exploration in terms of mission design, planetary
human outposts and scientific research," said Pozzobon and Franceso
Sauro, study author and professor in the department of biological,
geological and environmental sciences at the University of Bologna.
"Accessing
these caves and (analyzing) this type of subsurface environment will
present new technological challenges but also could provide unexpected
scientific discoveries."
For astronauts exploring the harsh environments and fluctuating
temperatures of the moon and Mars, the lava tubes could provide natural
shelter from radiation, impacts by micrometeorites and unstable
temperatures.
Micrometeorites pose a danger not only
to astronauts, but the habitats and life support equipment they'll need
on the moon and Mars. The caves could be used to live in and store
equipment.
It's even possible that the tubes could provide access to water ice reservoirs, the researchers said.
"But the challenges in order to access these caves and sustain human activity are nonetheless massive," the researchers said.
Forbes | Lava tubes on the moon and Mars may be large enough to fit city
center-sized groups of astronauts living on these other worlds, a new
study finds.
Lava tubes are an underground tunnel that happens due to the flow of
molten rock during a volcanic explosion. We get lava tubes on Earth as
well, but the ones on the moon and Mars are likely much larger —
allowing huge communities of people to work, live and explore on other
worlds.
A typical tube on Earth will be roughly 30 feet to 100 feet (10 to 30
meters) in diameter. But one on Mars could be the height of the Empire
State Building, with a diameter 10 times that of Earth. If that sounds
big, consider the moon, where its even lower gravity produces a tube up
to 1000 times larger than Earth’s — much taller than the massive Burj
Khalifa tower in Dubai.
It’s an exciting find because these small, cramped spaces on Earth
would instead open up into vast caverns of space on other worlds. Rather
than imagining future astronauts working shoulder to shoulder all the
time, these space explorers could easily stroll through otherworldly
boulevards, all sheltered from deadly outside radiation (and in the case
of Mars, fierce dust storms).
"These [lava tubes] represent ideal gateways or windows for subsurface
exploration,” said study lead author Francesco Sauro in a statement.
While we’ve known about these lava tubes for a while, the new study
shows just how large they are — able to contain the same space as the
city center of Padua, Italy in at least one case, Sauro said.
A Foundation of Joy
-
Two years and I've lost count of how many times my eye has been operated
on, either beating the fuck out of the tumor, or reattaching that slippery
eel ...
April Three
-
4/3
43
When 1 = A and 26 = Z
March = 43
What day?
4 to the power of 3 is 64
64th day is March 5
My birthday
March also has 5 letters.
4 x 3 = 12
...
Return of the Magi
-
Lately, the Holy Spirit is in the air. Emotional energy is swirling out of
the earth.I can feel it bubbling up, effervescing and evaporating around
us, s...
New Travels
-
Haven’t published on the Blog in quite a while. I at least part have been
immersed in the area of writing books. My focus is on Science Fiction an
Historic...
Covid-19 Preys Upon The Elderly And The Obese
-
sciencemag | This spring, after days of flulike symptoms and fever, a man
arrived at the emergency room at the University of Vermont Medical Center.
He ...