Counterpunch | Beals isn’t the only candidate for NY-19’s Democratic nomination with
ties to the Iraq War and the intelligence establishment. Patrick Ryan,
who served two tours in Iraq as an intelligence officer after graduating
from West Point, is also running in the primary against Beals.
“Seven years ago, Ryan, then working at a firm called
Berico Technologies, compiled a plan to create a real-time surveillance
operation of left-wing groups and labor unions… The pitch, a joint
venture with a now-defunct company called HBGary Federal and the Peter
Thiel-backed company Palantir Technologies, however, crumbled in 2011
after it was exposed in a series of news reports.
Years later, Ryan pivoted to a startup called Dataminr, a data
analytics company that provided social media monitoring solutions for
law enforcement clients. Dataminr, which received financial support from
the CIA’s venture capital arm, produced real-time updates about
activists for law enforcement. For example, according to documents
obtained by the American Civil Liberties Union of California and
reported by The Intercept for the first time, Dataminr helped track
social media posts relating to Black Lives Matter.”
Interestingly, Ryan has gone the traditional fundraising route, and
is orders of magnitude more flush with cash than Beals ($900,000 as of
the end of 2017 versus Beals’ $174,000). In a sense, these are two very
similar, odious candidates following two divergent campaign models
utilizing different elements of the Democratic Party machine.
Ryan is backed by right-wing elements of the Democratic Party, as evidenced by his receiving support from the New Democrat Coalition PAC,
a conservative, pro-business element of the party. In contrast, Beals
doesn’t have such overt institutional support, and is instead handled by
a Clinton surrogate who actively discourages large-scale fundraising as
part of his strategy to build up his candidate as the true voice of the
grassroots.
As such, Beals is attempting to craft an image as a progressive who
stands in contrast to the Blue Dog conservatism of Ryan. What can you
call this farce? It is the primary equivalent of professional wrestling.
A rigged game.
Beals and Ryan represent a disturbing trend taking place across the
country: intelligence insiders and military officers running as
Democrats in an election year that expects to see triumphs for Democrats
in reaction to the Trump shit show.
The World Socialist Website’s Patrick Martin has compiled a rather exhaustive list of other candidates who fall into this trend as well, including, but not limited to:
ROTFLMBAO..., Broke, busted. and cain't be trusted Joy Reed has now been cast as the face of progressive "evolution". Lil'Pookie and the whole and entire MSDNC rainbow coalition was out in force this morning in mock indignation to very mildly toast the ultimate hypocrisy and flagrant lying of Comcast's star #NeverTrump interrogator.
(scared to death of what's past that signpost up ahead under President Mike Pence - so - good, old fashioned Guyanese disgust with degeneracy doesn't hold a candle to the formalized de jure clampdown to come if the Deep State prevails in its attempted coup on Trump)
Mr. Rodger, who killed six people
in Isla Vista, Calif., in 2014, recorded YouTube videos raging against
“spoiled, stuck-up” women he called “sluts” who sexually rejected him.
And before Mr. Rodger, there was George Sodini, who killed three women
in a Pennsylvania gym in 2009. He left behind an online diary complaining that women ignored him and that he hadn’t had sex in years.
Despite
a great deal of evidence that connects the dots between these mass
killers and radical misogynist groups, we still largely refer to the
attackers as “lone wolves” — a mistake that ignores the preventable way
these men’s fear and anger are deliberately cultivated and fed online.
Here’s
the term we should all use instead: misogynist terrorism. Until we
grapple with the disdain for women that drives these mass murderers, and
the way that the killers are increasingly radicalized on the internet,
there will be no stopping future tragedies.
Over
the past decade, anti-women communities on the internet — ranging from
“men’s rights” forums and incels to “pickup artists” — have grown
exponentially. While these movements differ in small ways, what they
have in common is an organized hatred of women; the animus is so
pronounced that the hate-watch group Southern Poverty Law Center tracks their actions.
The
other dangerous idea that connects these men is their shared belief
that women — good-looking women, in particular — owe them sexual
attention. The incel community that Mr. Minassian paid homage to, for
example, was banned from Reddit last year because, among other issues, some adherents advocated rape as a means to end their celibacy.
nursingclio | Genetic counseling, as the previous two posts in this series
suggested, has a lot to offer for navigating the tricky decisions things
like prenatal testing and preimplantation genetic diagnosis raise.
Well, in this post I’d like to make things a little more complicated. Enter the sheer messiness of history.
I still believe genetic counseling is the best approach we have right
now for helping prospective parents with hard choices, but it has a
complicated — and not so distant — past that continues to shape
counselors’ ways of interacting with clients and their decisions.
A LITTLE REVIEW
In the first post
I shared a little bit of the history of genetic counseling in the
United States and gave some examples of how, today, it can help
prospective parents understand why they’re being tested and what those
tests might mean. The second post
discussed the history of blame and disability more broadly and
introduced the fact that ideas about what disability means have changed
over time — often significantly.
I’ve argued that genetic counseling has the potential to address
feelings of blame, guilt, and confusion in the face of genetic testing
results. Further, it can help answer questions like: What will life
actually be like for parents and their children? What do genetic tests
say and what don’t they say? What are the options after having a test?
My optimism about genetic counseling, evident in these two posts, is
tempered by the fact that it has a complex and challenging past with
origins in eugenics ideology that have influenced the way counseling is
provided today. In a sense what I’m suggesting is that genetic
counseling still has a lot of issues that need to be talked about and
worked on, but that it’s way better than nothing.
Lets take a look at what I mean about how eugenic ideas shaped genetic counseling.
EUGENIC BEGINNINGS
Most of the first genetic counselors in the 1940s, 1950s, and 1960s
were human geneticists, but the origins of human genetics lay in
eugenics. Early genetic counselors identified self-proclaimed
eugenicists like Charles Davenport, founder of the Eugenics Record
Office at Cold Spring Harbor — one of the nation’s leading eugenics
institutions between 1910 and the 1930s — as some of the first human
geneticists in the United States. And four of the first five presidents
of the American Society of Human Genetics, founded in 1948, were also
board members of the American Eugenics Society.[1]
Human geneticists tried to distance themselves from aspects of the
traditional eugenics movement, particularly its racial prejudices and
some of its scientific methods, but were still concerned about the
eugenic effects of their work. They worried about what effect their
counseling might have on the population as a whole.
gizmodo | Imagine a scenario, perhaps a few years from now, in which Canada
decides to release thousands of mosquitoes genetically modified to fight
the spread of a devastating mosquito-borne illness. While Canada has
deemed these lab-made mosquitoes ethical, legal and safe for both humans
and the environment, the US has not. Months later, by accident and
circumstance, the engineered skeeters show up across the border. The
laws of one land, suddenly, have become the rule of another.
If
modern science can can defy the boundaries of borders, who exactly
should be charged with deciding what science to unleash upon the world?
A
version of this hypothetical scenario is already unfolding in the UK.
Last year, the British government gave scientists the green light to
genetically engineer human embryos. But in the US and most other
nations, this possibility is still both illegal and morally fraught.
Opponents to the practice argue that it risks opening up a Pandora’s Box
of designer babies and genetically engineered super-humans. Even many more neutral voices argue that the technology demands further scrutiny.
And
yet, the UK, at the vanguard of genetic engineering human beings, has
already opened that box. In 2015, the British government approved the
use of a controversial gene-editing technology to stop devastating
mitochondrial diseases from being passed on from mothers to their future
children. And last February, the UK granted the first license in the
world to edit healthy human embryos for research. Recently, a Newsweek headline asked whether the scientists of this small island nation are in fact deciding the fate of all of humanity. It is a pretty good question.
This alarming ethical conundrum has not escaped the notice of global governments. A National Intelligence Council report
released this month concluded that “genome editing and human
enhancement” are “likely to pose some of the most contentious values
questions in the coming decades.” Advancements in these arenas, the
report said, “will affect relations between states.”
Dr. Calhoun was a researcher at the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH).
In his most famous experiment, four breeding pairs of mice were moved
into a mouse utopia. There were unlimited supplies of food, water and
bedding. The area was disease free, the temperature perfectly
controlled, and the researchers even cleaned the place monthly. As close
to heaven as a mouse could get. All that they lacked was infinite space. There was, however, room for 3,000 mice.
Mice, for those who are unaware,
are actually quite social creatures in the right conditions. They take
on group roles, mark out territories, and develop hierarchies if their
environment allows. It is this behavior that Calhoun wished to affect,
and study. He described the experiment in terms of four “eras”,
summarized here.
Days 0-100: The era called “Strive”. During which the mice were getting used to the new world, territories were established.
Days 100-315: The “Exploit”
period. The population doubled every 60 or so days. Normal social
behavior was noted here, and the population took full advantage of its
unlimited resources.
Days 315-600: The “Equilibrium”
period. It was here that the social roles of mice began to break down.
Mice born during this period found they lacked space to mark out
territories in, and random acts of violence among the mice began to
occur. Many males simply gave up on trying to find females. These males
retreated into their bedding and rarely ventured out. Simply eating,
sleeping, and grooming. Calhoun dubbed these narcissistic loners “The Beautiful Ones”. They also tended to be rather stupid.
Days 600-800: The “Die”
phase. The population, which maxed-out at 2,200, began to decline. No
surviving births took place after day 600, and the colony ultimately
died out. Individuals removed from the colony and placed in similar
units continued to demonstrate erratic behavior and also failed to
reproduce. The mice were remarkably violent at this time, for little
reason.
A formula was written to explain what happened to the
mice, how the population continued to crash even after conditions began
to improve again. Calhoun felt there were truly two deaths for the
mice: the first death was a spiritual one, leading to the
decline into chaos and madness. After that event, no recovery was
possible for the mice. The second was physical, and inevitable after the
first.
Counterpunch | It feels as if world events are in overdrive, and sometimes it’s hard
to escape the thought that that there is no longer much point in trying
to analyse, or make sense of, a trajectory increasingly out of control.
I see little evidence that those of us in the segment of the world
political spectrum likely to read these words need much persuasion — nor
that those who consider us dupes of the Evil Vladimir, or apologists
for what was once called the “Yellow Peril”, could ever have any
inclination to even glance at the arguments and sentiments of those they
consider so utterly deluded.
In fact, the plethora of information (both truth and lies), and the
amazing communicative possibilities most of us now have at our disposal,
have brought with them a world in which no one is very often persuaded
of anything: for every fact we present, they have access to an official
or cleverly crafted lie with convincing-looking documentation that
demonstrates our ostensible mendacity and subversion.
What pre-internet thinker – is it possible that bygone age ended only
20 years ago for most of us? — would have ever thought that a
technological world in which every voice can be heard worldwide would
solidify, rather than threaten, the role of propaganda in public life?
or that near-universal access to technology enabling impressively
thorough research, at incredible speed, would be one of the major
factors in eliminating political consensus and rendering nearly obsolete
the recognition of facts as such?
Well, perhaps there are brilliant minds out there who foresaw it all.
But consider me dumbfounded. While there is a range of similarities
between our world today and those described by Orwell and Huxley in
their famous novels of future horror, there are other aspects that
render this a different universe altogether, and one that continues to
shock me.
Assuming that it WERE in fact possible to persuade people who accept
their governments’ colossal lies and distortions that those same lies
are in fact exactly that – lies — one would be required to acquaint most
of them with the most basic facts of recent history. For remarkably,
almost unbelievably, in a world where all of us have limitless
information and history at our fingertips, most people know nothing
about recent history – and the vast majority is not even curious about
it.
‘Most White Americans, as a general statement, think they are better
than the rest of the world. And most Americans have scant knowledge
about the rest of the world. So the belief in cultural (and moral)
superiority is based on what? The answer is not simple, but as a general
sort of response, this trust in “our” superiority is built on violence.
On an ability to be effectively violent. Most British, too, think they
are superior to those “wogs” south of their emerald isle. But since the
setting of the sun on Empire, “officially”, the British hold to both a
sense of superiority and a deep panic-inducing sense of inferiority — at
least to their American cousins. They are still better than those
fucking cheese eating frogs or the krauts or whoever, but they accept
that the U.S. is the sort of heavyweight champ of the moment. Meanwhile,
the tragic and criminal fire at Grenfell Towers in London elicited a
public discourse that perfectly reflected the class inequality of the
UK, but also reflected, again, the colonialist mentality of the ruling
party and their constituency … But that is exactly it. The colonial
template is one etched in acid in the collective imagination of the
West. At least the English-speaking West. Expendable natives…which is
what Jim Mattis sees everywhere that he dumps depleted uranium and Willy
Pete. It is what Madeleine Albright saw in Iraq or Hillary Clinton in
Libya or Barack Obama in Sudan, Yemen, and…well… four or five other
countries. It is what most U.S. police departments see in neighborhoods
ravaged by poverty. As in those old Tarzan films, when the sound of
drums is heard, the pith helmeted white man notes…”the natives are
restless tonight”. When one discusses Syria, the most acute topic this
week, remember that for Mad Dog and Boss Trump, or for the loopy John
Bolton, these are just natives in need of pacification. Giving money to
ISIS or Daesh, or whoever, as a cynical expression of colonial
realpolitik, is nothing out of the ordinary. It is what the UK and US
have done for a long while. It’s Ramar of the Jungle handing out beads
to the *natives*.’ (John Steppling, “The Sleep of Civilization”)
medicalnewstoday | The potentially catastrophic consequences of an exponentially growing
global population is a favorite subject for writers of dystopian
fiction.
The most recent example, Utopia - a forthcoming David Fincher-directed series for HBO
- won critical acclaim in its original incarnation on UK television for
its depiction of a conspiracy-laden modern world where the real threat
to public health is not Ebola or other headline-friendly communicable viruses, but overpopulation.
Fears over the ever-expanding number of human bodies on our planet are
not new and have been debated by researchers and policy makers for
decades, if not centuries. However, recent research by University of Washington demographer Prof. Adrian Raftery
- using modern statistical modeling and the latest data on population,
fertility and mortality - has found that previous projections on
population growth may have been conservative.
"Our new projections are probabilistic, and we find that there will
probably be between 9.6 and 12.3 billion people in 2100," Prof. Raftery
told Medical News Today. "This projection is based on a
statistical model that uses all available past data on fertility and
mortality from all countries in a systematic way, unlike previous
projections that were based on expert assumptions."
Prof. Raftery's figure places up to an additional 5 billion people more
on the Earth by 2100 than have been previously calculated.
A key finding of the study is that the fertility rate in Africa is
declining much more slowly than has been previously estimated, which
Prof. Raftery tells us "has major long-term implications for
population."
rantt |Last month, the Southern Poverty Law Center for the first time added two male supremacy groups to its hate group watch list, noting in their announcement
that “the vilification of women by these groups makes them no different
than other groups that demean entire populations, such as the LGBT
community, Muslims or Jews, based on their inherent characteristics.”
The
decision to officially track the actions of two groups espousing male
supremacy ideology comes at a time in which fringe and extremist groups
have become increasingly emboldened through many factors, such astheir
unprecedented access to key political leaders. And it also comes at a
time when these groups are affecting tangible, real-world damage—to
women, to marginalized people, to media, and to the overarching
landscape of American politics.
The
rise and embrace of male supremacy groups has yielded violence and
provably damaging anti-woman White House policies. But perhaps most
terrifying of all, groups that operate on the premise of white male
victimhood, of the equation of female empowerment and diversity to
anti-male persecution, are spreading the message that marginalized
voices are a threat to free speech that must be expunged. This ideology
of invalidating modern feminist speech is most recognizable in that
innocuous term, “political correctness” — the idea that basic demands
for respect and recognition are somehow far from basic, and rather, an
oppressive overreach; that speech in opposition to misogynistic, hateful
speech is somehow not free speech, but rather, the hate speech that it
responds to is.
The
very concept of political correctness, espoused by the same thinkers
who founded male supremacy activism, is meant to trivialize oppression,
and through that trivialization, silence, rewrite history, and make
marginalized groups vulnerable to political attacks.
CounterPunch | You may not recognize names like Amy Cuddy, Kristina Durante, or Brian
Wansink but if you listen to NPR, watch TED talks, or read popular
online news sites or local and national outlets such as the New York
Times, you have probably stumbled across their work. They are among a
growing number of academics who have produced one or more exciting,
novel, too-amazing-to-be-true research studies that have caught the
attention of the media and have been widely disseminated through
American culture to the point that we may have internalized their
findings as fact. Yet their work has since been debunked, shown to be
unscientific and irreproducible. It is all part of what has been dubbed
the “replication crisis” in science. Since replication is one of the
basic tenets of science, failure to reproduce the results of a study
(especially after several attempts) indicates a lack of support for the
original findings. How does this happen time and time again, and what
does it say about science and the news media?
Case 1 – Amy Cuddy
Amy Cuddy’s famous study on how an assertive “power pose” could
elevate testosterone levels and increase a person’s confidence and
risk-taking was published in the prestigious Psychological Science,
one of the top journals in that field. Then a professor in the Harvard
Business School, Cuddy went on to give the second most-popular TED talk
ever, sign a book deal, and travel around the world commanding huge fees
on the lecture circuit based on the general theme of her study. In the
meantime, other skeptical researchers Joe Simmons and Uri Simonsohn questioned the veracity of her claims and Eva Ranehill and collegues failed to replicate the results of the study. One of Cuddy’s co-authors, Dana Carney, has since withdrawn her support of the study, saying “I do not believe the effects are real.” But Cuddy, having voluntarily left her academic position, still stands by her work.
In truth, not only is the power pose study a replication failure, it
is a failure of peer review. No one needs a particularly specialized
expertise to see some of the problems with the study. One glance at the methods section of the paper
and you see the sample size of 42, hardly sufficient or statistically
powerful. In addition, like in many studies, specific subjective proxies
were used to indicate a much more general, supposedly objective,
finding. Here, risk taking was measured by participants’ willingness to
perform a certain gambling task. Yet one’s interest in gambling is not
necessarily directly proportional to one’s interest in other risky
activities. Further, participants’ levels of confidence were
self-reported on a scale of 1-5. Self-reporting is always error prone,
because your level of “2” may not be equivalent to my level of “2.” And
yet, all of these subjective measurements are treated as concrete
quantifiable data. Finally, the study assumed no cultural differences;
demonstrations of power or confidence might not be viewed as beneficial
and positive as they are assumed to be in the American culture.
You can see how the reliability of the study deteriorates under
scrutiny. But no study is perfect. One of the biggest problems with this
study and many similar ones is not just how unreliable the results are,
but that the results are treated as generalizable to everyone
everywhere. If Cuddy had defined the results as provisional and
contingent upon certain assumptions, and circumstances, then her
research might have been more defendable, but instead she presented her
shoddy science as universal immutable fact. This practice appears to be
too widespread.
medium | This Red Scare reboot keeps getting stranger and stranger.
In a recent discussion with Infowars‘
Alex Jones, Luis Elizondo of To The Stars Academy spoke about new video
footage of UFO phenomena recently released by the Pentagon, and says
the three videos that have been released so far comprise just a small
fraction of the strange and compelling evidence that he has accessed
personally.
“These
are just three videos now that have come out that everybody’s looking
at,” Elizondo said as Jones downed an entire pitcher of CAVEMAN True
Alpha Bone Broth Formula™ without pausing to breathe or breaking eye
contact with the camera. “But there is far more compelling evidence that
I was privy to that — you know, I think you’re looking at the tip of
the iceberg.”
“It
could be anything, so I wouldn’t rule anything out, and that’s why I
think we need to look at it,” Elizondo added. “I mean it could be
Russian. It could be Chinese. It could be little green men from Mars. We
don’t know what the hell it is.”
Oh wait, sorry, I got mixed up. That wasn’t Infowars, it was CNN.
The
mass media propaganda machine is very busy. It’s got wars to
manufacture consent for, it’s got Russia to lie about, it’s got a CIA-packed
midterm election to sell as healthy democracy, it’s got end-stage
ecocidal neoliberalism to disguise as freedom and sanity, and it’s got a
corporatist oligarchy to dress up as a constitutional representative
republic. How is it finding the time to talk about space aliens so much
all of a sudden?
thesaker | Assuming mankind finds a way not to destroy itself in the near future
and assuming that there will still be historians in the 22nd or 23rd
centuries, I bet you that they will look at the AngloZionist Empire and
see the four following characteristics as some of its core features:
lies, willful ignorance, hypocrisy, and hysterics. To illustrate my
point I will use the recent “Skripal nerve-gas assassination” story as it really encompasses all of these characteristics.
I won’t even bother debunking the official nonsense here as others
have done a very good job of pointing out the idiocy of the official
narrative. If you are truly capable of believing that “Putin” (that is
the current collective designator for the Evil Empire of Mordor
currently threatening all of western civilization) would order the
murder of a man whom a Russian military court sentenced to only 13 years
in jail (as opposed to life or death) and who was subsequently released
as part of a swap with the USA, you can stop reading right now and go
back to watching TV. I personally have neither the energy nor the
inclination to even discuss such a self-evidently absurd theory. No,
what I do want to do is use this story as a perfect illustration of the
kind of society we now all live in looked at from a moral point of view.
I realize that we live in a largely value-free society where moral
norms have been replaced by ideological orthodoxy, but that is just one
more reason for me to write about what is taking place precisely
focusing on the moral dimensions of current events.
I see a direct cause and effect relationship between
the denial of moral reality and the denial of physical reality. I can’t
prove that, of course, but here is my thesis: Almost from day one, the
early western civilization began by, shall we say, taking liberties with
the truth, which it could bend, adapt, massage and repackage to serve
the ideological agenda of the day. It was not quite the full-blown and
unapologetic relativism of the 19th century yet, but it was an important
first step. With “principles” such as the end justifies the means and
the wholesale violation of the Ten Commandants all “for the greater
glory of God” the western civilization got cozy with the idea that there
was no real, objective truth, only the subjective perception or even
representation each person might have thereof. Fast forward another 10
centuries or so and we end up with the modern “Gayropa” (as Europe is
now often referred to in Russia): not only has God been declared ‘dead’
and all notions of right and wrong dismissed as “cultural”, but even
objective reality has now been rendered contingent upon political
expediency and ideological imperatives.
I went on to quote George Orwell by reminding how he defined “doublethink” in his book 1984:
“To know and not to know, to be conscious of complete
truthfulness while telling carefully constructed lies, to hold
simultaneously two opinions which canceled out, knowing them to be
contradictory and believing in both of them, to use logic against logic, to repudiate morality while laying claim to it
(…) To tell deliberate lies while genuinely believing in them, to
forget any fact that has become inconvenient, and then, when it becomes
necessary again, to draw it back from oblivion for just as long as it is
needed, to deny the existenceof objective reality“
and I concluded by saying that “The necessary corollary from this state of mind is that only appearances matter, not reality”.
This is exactly what we are observing; not only in the silly Skripal
nerve-gas assassination story but also in all the rest of the
Russophobic nonsense produced by the AngloZionist propaganda machine
including the “Litvinenko polonium murder” and the “Yushchenko dioxin poisoning“.
The fact that neither nerve-gas, nor polonium nor dioxin are in any way
effective murder weapons does not matter in the least: a simple
drive-by shooting, street-stabbing or, better, any “accident” is both
easier to arrange and impossible to trace. Fancy assassination methods
are used when access to the target is very hard or impossible (as was
the case with Ibn al-Khattab, whose assassination the Russians were more than happy to take credit for; this might also have been the case with the death of Yasser Arafat).
But the best way of murdering somebody is to simply make the body
disappear, making any subsequent investigation almost impossible.
Finally, you can always subcontract the assassination to somebody else
like, for example, when the CIA tried and failed, to murderGrand Ayatollah Mohammad Hussain Fadlallah
by subcontracting his bombing to its local “Christian” allies, killing
over 80 innocent people in the process. There is plenty of common crime
in the UK and to get somebody to rob and stab Skripal would have
probably been the easiest version. That’s assuming that the Russians had
any reason to want him dead, which they self-evidently didn’t.
But here is the important thing: every single criminal or
intelligence specialist in the West understands all of the above. But
that does not stop the Ziomedia from publishing articles like this one “A Brief History of Attempted Russian Assassinations by Poison” which also lists people poisoned by Russians
vanityfair |When I first came out to L.A. [in 1968], my friend [photographer]
Joel Bernstein found an old book in a flea market that said: Ask
anyone in America where the craziest people live and they’ll tell you
California. Ask anyone in California where the craziest people live
and they’ll say Los Angeles. Ask anyone in Los Angeles where the
craziest people live and they’ll tell you Hollywood. Ask anyone in
Hollywood where the craziest people live and they’ll say Laurel
Canyon. And ask anyone in Laurel Canyon where the craziest people live
and they’ll say Lookout Mountain. So I bought a house on Lookout
Mountain. —Joni Mitchell
jaysanalysis | It seems more and more as if we are living in a bad B movie, replete
with cheesy set pieces and a Casio keyboard score – and the reason for
that is because we are. We have focused on Hollywood and propaganda
often at JaysAnalysis, but we have not looked at the music industry,
aside from brief mentions and a few shows. When it comes to the score
for that B movie we all live in, the best analysis I’ve read in a good
while is none other than recently deceased Dave McGowan’s excellent
work, Weird Scenes Inside the Canyon: Laurel Canyon, Covert Ops & the Dark Heart of the Hippie Dream. I also have the honor of Amazon classing my book, Esoteric Hollywood,
with McGowan’s, in the “readers also purchased” section. I get emails
on daily basis requesting book recommendations (which is much harder to
choose than you’d expect), so I think for the spirit of my site, no
better book could be suggested for a reading list than Weird Scenes (aside from my own book, of course).
McGowan’s thesis is simple: The 1960s counter-culture movement was
not what it appeared to be. In a purple haze of pot smoke, free love,
booze and LSD tabs, the fog of the 60s is believed by most baby-boomers
to be a genuine (monstrous for faux conservatives) reaction
against the system. From student protests to politically active
musicians, the anti-war, anti-establishment ethos of the 60s was, so the
story goes, a natural, organic reaction to a hawkish, greedy corporate
demon, embodied in “the man,” opposed by all those revolutionaries who
love freedom, expressing themselves in the “arts.” After reading
McGowan’s analysis (a self-confessed fan of this era), it would appear
the mainstream view is only slightly correct – some artists were
political and genuinely anti-establishment, but the big names, and the
movements as a whole, were promoted and directed by design, for
large-scale social engineering.
McGowan begins his argumentation by pointing to Jim Morrison’s
father, Navy Admiral George Stephen Morrison, who played a central role
in the Gulf of Tonkin’s false flag event. Morrison, curiously, avoided
this association, stating his parents were dead, adding fuel to his
mythical narrative of having no musical training and supposedly becoming
a musical shaman following ghostly encounters and hallucinogenic trips.
While some of that may have been the case (such as the trips and
witchcraft initiation, for example, as shown in Oliver Stone’s The Doors),
the real story is likely much closer to McGowan’s analysis – Morrison
was promoted and made into an icon by the system because of these high
level connections. However, being well-connected was not the only
explanation – the establishment had a specific motive of derailing any
legitimate anti-war activism or artwork, as well as moving the culture
into a more degenerate state for social engineering.
strategic-culture |Although
AFRICOM is mandated to conduct “stability operations,” there is
evidence that the command has engaged in fomenting military coups in
Africa. In 2009, a group of Guinean army officers who attempted to
assassinate Guinea's President, Captain Moussa Dadis Camara, were
operating under orders of US Special Forces assigned to the US Africa
Command (AFRICOM) and French military intelligence personnel. Camara,
himself, seized power in a December 2008 coup in following the death of
Guinea's President Lansana Conte.
Camara
had apparently signed a deal with China for that nation to take over
bauxite mining contracts from US and French companies with the promise
that China would refine bauxite into aluminum by building a factory in
Guinea. The Americans and French previously exported raw bauxite to
smelters abroad. The offer of the Chinese to smelter bauxite in Guinea,
with the promise of well-paying jobs for the impoverished nation, was
too much for France and the United States and a "hit" was ordered on
Camara, using assets in the Guinean military trained by AFRICOM in
Guinea, Germany, and the United States.
The
National Security Agency, America’s top signals intelligence
(SIGINT)-gathering agency, has invested hundreds of millions of dollars
in training intercept operators in a number of languages, including
those spoken in Africa. AFRICOM has operated a redundant and dual
linguist training program, mirroring the NSA program. AFRICOM has spent
millions needlessly duplicating the NSA in training speakers and to be
fluent in Bemba, Bete, Ebira, Fon, Gogo, Kalenjin, Kamba, Luba-Katanga,
Mbundu/Umbundu, Nyanja, Sango, Sukuma, Tsonga/Tonga, Amharic, Dinka,
Somali, Tigrinya, and Swahili. This is just one of many examples by
which AFRICOM has served as a complete waste of money in duplicative
efforts undertaken by other government agencies and elements.
The
June 4, 2017 strangling death in Bamako, Mali of US Army Green Beret
Staff Sgt. Logan Melgar by two US Navy SEALs, all deployed under
AFRICOM’s direction, was linked to Melgar’s discovery that the two Navy
personnel were pocketing official funds used by AFRICOM to pay off
informants in the West African country. The fraud was yet another
example of the culture of malfeasance present among AFRICOM’s ranks.
zeroanthropology | The “views” of the university are a mercantile
fiction, a falsehood designed to mislead the public and to caress donors
and politicians, the kinds of individuals who are apparently empty and
infantile enough to believe that the winning arguments are those that
are advanced in the absence of criticism. What if we taught our students
that the best way to learn is to ignore whatever they do not like to
hear? That is indeed what is being pushed, ironically under the signs of
“tolerance” and “inclusion,” the usual neoliberal claptrap. Thus we
witness the university turned into a mere echo chamber for the
comfortable, a safe space for moneyed elites to flatter themselves,
creating a virtual world of unrivalled ideological purity, contrived
harmony, and eternal hegemony.
Finally, messages from university administrators
along the lines of “this does not represent the views of the
university,” might serve an additional function, but I am just
speculating. This might be a polite way of telling rabid members of the
public to lay off. We heard you, yes it’s all quite disconcerting, and
here is our little statement, now move along. Had universities with
their bloated administrations and overt political leanings not wished to
enhance their public profiles and represent themselves as quasi-media
outlets, they would spare themselves such unnecessary exercises. In the
end, pronouncements about “the views of the university” end up
multiplying the damage to the university, both as a self-inflicted
wounds within the university, and as a sign of intellectual cowardice in
the face of bullies. A university administration that engages in such
conduct has failed its first and most basic function: to administer
university resources in order to facilitate teaching and learning.
thehill | Conservative commentator Bill Kristol rips Fox News's Tucker Carlson
in a new interview, saying his show could be "close now to racism" or
"ethnonationalism."
"I mean, it is close now to racism, white — I
mean, I don't know if it's racism exactly — but ethnonationalism of
some kind, let's call it. A combination of dumbing down, as you said
earlier, and stirring people's emotions in a very unhealthy way,"
Kristol told CNBC's John Harwood in the interview published on Thursday.
Back from Israel, where you see "that inner freedom, that simple dignity" of "people who remember their heritage & are loyal to their fate."
Carlson recently questioned the
widespread outrage over Trump's reported comments referring to Haiti,
El Salvador and African nations as "shithole countries."
"So, if
you say Norway is a better place to live and Haiti is kind of a hole,
well anyone who’s been to those countries or has lived in them would
agree. But we’re jumping up and down, ‘Oh, you can’t say that.’ Why
can’t you say that?" Carlson asked.
theintercept | In his farewell address, President Barack Obama had some practical
advice for those frustrated by his successor. “If you’re disappointed by
your elected officials, grab a clipboard, get some signatures, and run
for office yourself,” Obama implored.
Yet across the country, the DCCC, its allied groups, or leaders
within the Democratic Party are working hard against some of these new
candidates for Congress, publicly backing their more established
opponents, according to interviews with more than 50 candidates, party
operatives, and members of Congress. Winning the support of Washington
heavyweights, including the DCCC — implicit or explicit — is critical
for endorsements back home and a boost to fundraising. In general, it
can give a candidate a tremendous advantage over opponents in a
Democratic primary.
In district after district, the national party is throwing its weight
behind candidates who are out of step with the national mood. The DCCC —
known as “the D-trip” in Washington — has officially named 18
candidates as part of its “Red to Blue” program. (A D-trip spokesperson
cautioned that a red-to-blue designation is not an official endorsement,
but functions that way in practice. Program designees get exclusive
financial and strategy resources from the party.) In many of those
districts, there is at least one progressive challenger the party is
working to elbow aside, some more viable than others.
Outside of those
18, the party is coalescing in less formal ways around a chosen
candidate — such as in the case of Pennsylvania’s Hartman — even if the
DCCC itself is not publicly endorsing.
It’s happening despite a very real shift going on inside the party’s
establishment, as it increasingly recognizes the value of small-dollar
donors and grassroots networks. “In assessing the strength of candidates
for Congress this cycle, we have put a greater premium on their
grassroots engagement and local support, recognizing the power and
energy of our allies on the ground,” said DCCC Communications Director
Meredith Kelly. “A deep and early connection to people in the district
is always essential to winning, but it’s more important than ever at
this moment in our history.” The committee, meanwhile, has made major investments in grassroots organizing, field work and candidate training, which also represents a genuine change.
But change is hard, and it isn’t happening fast enough for candidates
like King. So a constellation of outside progressive groups — some new
to this cycle, some legacies of the last decade’s growth in online
organizing — are stepping in, seeing explosive fundraising gains while the Democratic National Committee falls further and further behind.
The time between now and July, by which most states will have held
primaries, will be among the most important six months for the future of
the Democratic Party, as the contests will decide what kind of party
heads into the midterms in November 2018. The outcome will also shape
the Democratic strategy for 2020, which in turn will shape the party’s
agenda when and if it does reclaim power.
“We are proud to work with women, veterans, local job creators, and
first-time candidates in their runs for Congress, whose records of
service to our country and communities are being recognized – first and
foremost – in the districts they aim to serve,” Kelly said.
(CNN)
Author and foreign policy analyst Max Boot feels President Donald Trump
is making him feel like a “foreigner” in his own country.
“He’s making me feel like an outsider, a Russian, a Jew, an immigrant,” Boot told CNN’s Fareed Zakaria.
“Anything
but kind of a normal mainstream American, because of the way that he is
dividing us and balkanizing us and seems to be catering to this white
nationalist agenda.” …
Boot
said it was “especially chilling” to hear people like Steve Bannon and
Steve Miller trying to change the character of the country by “saying
we’re not a nation of immigrants.”
And now from Foreign Policy, Mr. Invade-the-World/Invite-the-World himself, Max Boot, announced that Trump’s election has opened his eyes to White Privilege:
I used to be a smart-alecky conservative who scoffed at “political correctness.” The Trump era has opened my eyes.
BY MAX BOOT | DECEMBER 27, 2017, 1:55 PM
Max
Boot is the Jeane J. Kirkpatrick senior fellow for national security
studies at the Council on Foreign Relations. His forthcoming book is
“The Road Not Taken: Edward Lansdale and the American Tragedy in
Vietnam.”
In
college — this was in the late 1980s and early 1990s at the University
of California, Berkeley — I used to be one of those smart-alecky young
conservatives who would scoff at the notion of “white male privilege”
and claim that anyone propagating such concepts was guilty of “political
correctness.” As a Jewish refugee from the Soviet Union, I felt it was
ridiculous to expect me to atone for the sins of slavery and
segregation, to say nothing of the household drudgery and workplace
discrimination suffered by women. I wasn’t racist or sexist. (Or so I
thought.) I hadn’t discriminated against anyone. (Or so I thought.) My
ancestors were not slave owners or lynchers; they were more likely
victims of the pogroms.
I
saw America as a land of opportunity, not a bastion of racism or
sexism. I didn’t even think that I was a “white” person — the catchall
category that has been extended to include everyone from a Mayflower
descendant to a recently arrived illegal immigrant from Ireland….
That
last sentence is just bizarre: if you are claiming that “white” is a
“catchall category” that has been “extended” to “include everyone” … and
then as your examples of apparent polar opposites you come up with a
Mayflower WASP and an Irishman … huh? What is going on in Max Boot’s
head?
Blockchain is the digital and decentralized ledger that records all transactions. Every time someone buys digital coins on a decentralized exchange, sells coins, transfers coins, or buys a good or service with virtual coins, a ledger records that transaction, often in an encrypted fashion, to protect it from cybercriminals. These transactions are also recorded and processed without a third-party provider, which is usually a bank.
Why was blockchain invented?
The main reason we even have this cryptocurrency and blockchain revolution is as a result of the perceived shortcomings of the traditional banking system. What shortcomings, you ask? For example, when transferring money to overseas markets, a payment could be delayed for days while a bank verifies it. Many would argue that financial institutions shouldn't tie up cross-border payments and funds for such an extensive amount of time.
Likewise, banks almost always serve as an intermediary of currency transactions, thus taking their cut in the process. Blockchain developers want the ability to process payments without a need for this middleman.
What are its prime advantages over current networks?
So, what does blockchain technology bring to the table
that current payment networks don't? For starters, and as noted, it's
decentralized. That's a fancy way of saying that there's no central hub
where transaction data is stored. Instead, servers and hard drives all
over the world hold bits and pieces of these blocks of data. This is
done for two purposes. First, it ensures that no one party can gain
control over a cryptocurrency and blockchain. Also, it keeps
cybercriminals from being able to hold a digital currency "hostage"
should they gain access to transaction data.
Second, removing the middleman from the equation and working around
the traditional banking system should allow for smaller transaction
fees. What's unclear is if lower fees would mean cheaper fees for the
consumer, or just bigger profits for businesses deploying blockchain
technology.
Third, and maybe most important, blockchain offers the potential to
process transactions considerably faster. Whereas banks are often closed
on the weekend, and operate during traditional hours, validation of
transactions on a blockchain occur 24 hours a day, seven days a week.
Some blockchain developers have suggested that their networks can
validate transactions in a few seconds, or perhaps instantly. That would
be a big improvement over the current wait time for cross-border
payments.
ibankcoin | Crypto currency Bitconnect (BCC) plunged from $321 to a tad over $35
today, a drop of more than 86% after regulators from state authorities
issued cease and desist letters for unauthorized sale of securities.
That’s right. Just because your shit is on the blockchain, that doesn’t
mean you get to solicit your fucking Ponzi scheme to people in America.
State regulators will have something to say about that.
Via the company’s website, as per the reasons for shutting down.
The reason for halt of lending and exchange platform has many reasons as follow:
The continuous bad press has made community members uneasy and created a lack of confidence in the platform.
We have received two Cease and Desist letters, one from the Texas State
Securities Board, and one from the North Carolina Secretary of State
Securities Division. These actions have become a hindrance for the legal
continuation of the platform.
Outside forces have performed DDos attacks on platform several times
and have made it clear that these will continue. These interruptions in
service have made the platform unstable and have created more panic
inside the community.
Price action.
What did Bitconnect do? They quite literally ran a Ponzi scheme. Look
at one of their brochures, promising investors 40% returns, PER MONTH.
Via Tech Crunch:
Many in the cryptocurrency community have openly accused
Bitconnnect of running a Ponzi scheme, including Ethereum founder
Vitalik Buterin.
The platform was powered by a token called BCC (not to be confused
with BCH, or Bitcoin Cash), which is essentially useless now that the
trading platform has shut down. In the last The token has plummeted more
than 80% to about $37, down from over $200 just a few hours ago.
If you aren’t familiar with the platform, Bitconnect was an
anonymously-run site where users could loan their cryptocurrency to the
company in exchange for outsized returns depending on how long the loan
was for. For example, a $10,000 loan for 180 days would purportedly give
you ~40% returns each month, with a .20% daily bonus.
Bitconnect also had a thriving multi-level referral feature, which
also made it somewhat akin to a pyramid scheme with thousands of social
media users trying to drive signups using their referral code.
The platform said it generated returns for users using Bitconnnect’s
trading bot and “volatility trading software”, which usually averaged
around 1% per day.
Of course profiting from market fluctuations and volatility is a
legitimate trading strategy, and one used by many hedge funds and
institutional traders. But Bitconnect’s promise (and payment) of
outsized and guaranteed returns led many to believe it was a ponzi
scheme that was paying out existing loan interest with newly pledged
loans.
The requirement of having BCC to participate in the lending program
led to a natural spike in demand (and price) of BCC. In less than a year
the currency went from being worth less than a dollar (with a market
cap in the millions) to a all-time high of ~$430.00 with a market cap
above $2.6B.
Lenders into the Bitconnect Exchange have revealed the company is
closing out accounts, issuing BCC in exchange for their dollars — which
is causing the price to plummet.
Bitconnect is officially closing up. They sent me
33 BCC for my $11k+ in loans. Worth $6600 and dropping by the second.
Their exchange is down so the only option is to send the BCC to an
external exchange.
Kitty, I Farted
-
Hello Loves
In France, ChatGPT is phonetically similar to *Chat, Je pete, *which means
female cat (kitty), I farted. New programs are worrying over jobs ...
April Three
-
4/3
43
When 1 = A and 26 = Z
March = 43
What day?
4 to the power of 3 is 64
64th day is March 5
My birthday
March also has 5 letters.
4 x 3 = 12
...
Return of the Magi
-
Lately, the Holy Spirit is in the air. Emotional energy is swirling out of
the earth.I can feel it bubbling up, effervescing and evaporating around
us, s...
New Travels
-
Haven’t published on the Blog in quite a while. I at least part have been
immersed in the area of writing books. My focus is on Science Fiction an
Historic...
Covid-19 Preys Upon The Elderly And The Obese
-
sciencemag | This spring, after days of flulike symptoms and fever, a man
arrived at the emergency room at the University of Vermont Medical Center.
He ...